Comparing Strengths and Weaknesses of Three Approaches in Estimating Social Demands for Local Forest Ecosystem Services in South Korea
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Areas
2.2. AHP Analysis Based on Interviews and Survey Data of Local Residents
2.3. Sentiment Analysis Based on Web Crawling
2.4. Spatial Analysis Based on Floating Population
3. Results
3.1. AHP Analysis
3.2. Sentiment Analysis
3.2.1. Word Cloud
3.2.2. Sentiment Analysis Mapping
3.3. Floating Population Analysis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Costanza, R.; d’Arge, R.; De Groot, R.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Groot, R.S.; Wilson, M.A.; Boumans, R.M. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41, 393–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Maes, J.; Paracchini, M.L.; Zulian, G.; Dunbar, M.B.; Alkemade, R. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in europe. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 155, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, G. The relationship between social values for ecosystem services and global land cover: An empirical analysis. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 5, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sikor, T.; Martin, A.; Fisher, J.; He, J. Toward an empirical analysis of justice in ecosystem governance. Conserv. Lett. 2014, 7, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jo, J.; Roh, T.; Hwang, J.; Lee, K.; Lee, C. Factors and paths affecting payment for forest ecosystem service: Evidence from voluntary forest carbon market in South Korea. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, O.S.; Newell, J.P. The ‘geographic emission benchmark’ model: A baseline approach to measuring emissions associated with deforestation and degradation. J. Land Use Sci. 2015, 10, 466–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, O.S. An assessment of deforestation models for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD). Trans. GIS 2010, 14, 631–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burkhard, B.; Kroll, F.; Nedkov, S.; Müller, F. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol. Ind. 2012, 21, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jo, J.; Choi, M.; Kim, O.S.; Lee, K.; Lee, C. Mapping the supply of local forest ecosystem services: Based on delphi and land use scoring method. J. Assoc. Korean Geogr. 2020, 295–312. (In Korean) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastian, O.; Syrbe, R.U.; Rosenberg, M.; Rahe, D.; Grunewald, K. The five pillar EPPS framework for quantifying, mapping and managing ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 4, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haines-Young, R. The Links between Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010; pp. 110–139. [Google Scholar]
- Wolff, S.; Schulp, C.J.E.; Verburg, P.H. Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives. Ecol. Ind. 2015, 55, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schröter, M.; van der Zanden, E.H.; van Oudenhoven, A.P.E.; Remme, R.P.; Serna-Chavez, H.M.; de Groot, R.S.; Opdam, P. Ecosystem services as a contested concept: A synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Conserv. Lett. 2014, 7, 514–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martín-López, B.; Iniesta-Arandia, I.; García-Llorente, M.; Palomo, I.; Casado-Arzuaga, I.; Amo, D.G.D.; Gómez-Baggethun, E.; Oteros-Rozas, E.; Palacios-Agundez, I.; Willaarts, B.; et al. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Plieninger, T.; Dijks, S.; Oteros-rozas, E.; Bieling, C. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 2013, 33, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Casado-Arzuaga, I.; Madariaga, I.; Onaindia, M. Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the bilbao metropolitan greenbelt. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 129, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, H.; Fan, W.; Wang, X.; Lu, N.; Dong, X.; Zhao, Y.; Ya, X.; Zhao, Y. Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment: A review. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 25, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reed, P.; Brown, G. Values suitability analysis: A methodology for identifying and integrating public perceptions of ecosystem values in forest planning. J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 2003, 46, 643–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rathore, S.; Kumar, P.; Loia, V.; Jeong, Y.; Park, J.H. Social network security: Issues, challenges, threats, and solutions. Inf. Sci. 2017, 421, 43–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoshimura, N.; Hiura, T. Demand and supply of cultural ecosystem services: Use of geotagged photos to map the aesthetic value of landscapes in hokkaido. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 24, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, D.; Jeong, H.; Park, S.; Han, E.; Kim, H.; Yun, I. Study on the methodology for extracting information from SNS using a sentiment analysis. J. Korea Inst. Intell. Trans. Syst. 2017, 16, 141–155. (In Korean) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakshi, R.K.; Kaur, N.; Kaur, R.; Kaur, G. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), New Delhi, India, 16–18 March 2016; pp. 452–455. [Google Scholar]
- Oke, A.; Osobajo, O.; Obi, L.; Omotayo, T. Rethinking and optimising post-consumer packaging waste: A sentiment analysis of consumers’ perceptions towards the introduction of a deposit refund scheme in Scotland. Waste Manag. 2020, 118, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loaiza, J.P.V.; Pérez-Torres, A.; Contreras, K.M.D. Semantic icons: A sentiment analysis as a contribution to sustainable tourism. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yun, H.; Choi, E. A study on sentiment analysis of media and SNS response to national policy: Focusing on policy of child allowance, childbirth grant. J. Digit. Converg. 2019, 17, 195–200. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y. Using twitter sentiment analysis as a means of measuring housing satisfaction. Korean Soc. Cadastre 2017, 33, 1–21. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
- Liu, B. Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining; Morgan & Claypool Publishers: San Rafael, CA, USA, 2012; pp. 1–184. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.; Park, H.; Kim, I.; Kwon, H. Issue difference of ecosystem service demand and supply through text mining analysis: Case study of shiheung using complaints and urban planning materials. J. Korean Soc. Rural. Plan. 2018, 24, 63–71. (In Korean) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baró, F.; Palomo, I.; Zulian, G.; Vizcaino, P.; Haase, D.; Gómez-Baggethun, E. Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: A case study in the barcelona metropolitan region. Land Use Policy 2016, 57, 405–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ala-Hulkko, T.; Kotavaara, O.; Alahuhta, J.; Hjort, J. Mapping supply and demand of a provisioning ecosystem service across europe. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 103, 520–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunford, R.; Harrison, P.; Smith, A.; Dick, J.; Barton, D.N.; Martin-Lopez, B.; Kelemen, E.; Jacobs, S.; Saarikoski, H.; Turkelboom, F.; et al. Integrating Methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 29, 499–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saaty, T.L. An exposition of the ahp in reply to the paper “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process”. Manag. Sci. 1990, 36, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurttila, M.; Pesonen, M.; Kangas, J.; Kajanus, M. Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (ahp) in swot analysis—A hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. For. Policy Ecol. 2000, 1, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veisi, H.; Liaghati, H.; Alipour, A. Developing an ethics-based approach to indicators of sustainable agriculture using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Ecol. Ind. 2016, 60, 644–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elavarasan, R.M.; Leoponraj, S.; Vishnupriyan, J.; Dheeraj, A.; Sundar, G.G. Multi-criteria decision analysis for user satisfaction-induced demand-side load management for an institutional building. Renew. Energy 2021, 170, 1396–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, P.; Mehlawat, M.; Aggarwal, U.; Charles, V. An integrated ahp-dea multi-objective optimization model for sustainable transportation in mining industry. Resour. Policy 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, N.; Vrat, P. An evaluation of alternative business excellence models using AHP. J. Adv. Manag. Res. 2019, 17, 305–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang-Hwan, J.; So-Hee, P.; JaChoon, K.; Taewoo, R.; Lim, E.M.; Yeo-Chang, Y. Preferences for Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Forests in South Korea. For. Sci. Technol. 2020, 16, 86–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saaty, T.L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process; RWS publications: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, M.; Liu, B. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Seattle, WA, USA, 22–25 August 2004; pp. 168–177. [Google Scholar]
- Curtis, A.; Felix, C.; Mitchell, S.; Ajayakumar, J.; Kerndt, P.R. Contextualizing overdoses in Los Angeles’s skid row between 2014 and 2016 by leveraging the spatial knowledge of the marginalized as a resource. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 2018, 108, 1521–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Curtis, A.; Squires, R.; Rouzier, V.; Pape, J.W.; Ajayakumar, J.; Bempah, S.; Taifur Alam, M.; Alam, M.; Rashid, M.H.; Ali, A. Micro-space complexity and context in the space-time variation in enteric disease risk for three informal settlements of port au prince, haiti. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Curtis, A.; Curtis, J.W.; Ajayakumar, J.; Jefferis, E.; Mitchell, S. Same space—Different perspectives: Comparative analysis of geographic context through sketch maps and spatial video geonarratives. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2019, 33, 1224–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajayakumar, J.; Curtis, A.; Smith, S.; Curtis, J. The use of geonarratives to add context to fine scale geospatial research. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bempah, S.; Curtis, A.; Awandare, G.; Ajayakumar, J. Appreciating the complexity of localized malaria risk in ghana: Spatial data challenges and solutions. Health Place 2020, 64, 102382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhi-Ying, H.; Yeo-Chang, Y. Beijing resident’s preferences of ecosystem services of urban forests. Forests 2021, 12, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jo, J.; Roh, T.; Shin, S.; Youn, Y. Sustainable assets and strategies affecting the forestry household income: Empirical evidence from south korea. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Score | Standard for Words |
---|---|
2 | Happiness, Best, I want to come visit again, Excellent, Enjoyable, I miss it already, Beautiful, Recommend, Well-done, Cheerful, Comfortable, Exciting, Well-made, Clean, etc. |
1 | Feel relieved, Seems good, Was good but, Satisfied, etc. |
0 | Not bad, Nothing great, Just right, Good for one visit, Just about OK, etc. (Included also no opinions or assessments) |
−1 | Annoying, Disappointing, Plain, Tiring, etc. |
−2 | Uncomfortable, Dirty, Unpleasant, Regrettable, Nothing to see, Boring, etc. |
Non-Timber Forest Product | Timber | Water Resource | Erosion Prevention | Water Quality Control |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wild greens, Wild ginseng, Arrowroot, Collection & Picking signs, No-collection & Picking signs, Gom-chwi herb mushroom, Pine mushroom, Native plant, Provisions for residents, Cultivation, etc. | - | Drinking water, Dong-gang River, Jangjeon Valley, Residents’ use Drinking water fountain, Artificial waterfall, etc. | - | Clear water, Clear valley, Recycling, Trash, Trash bag, Announcement, etc. |
Carbon Absorption | Air Quality | Recreation and Sightseeing | Education about Nature | Biodiversity Improvement |
No-smoking, Clean nature, Breathing, Clean mountain, Oxygen, Role of trees, Carbon dioxide absorption, Comparison with Seoul air, Forest scent, etc. | Air, Water fog, Breathing, Freshness, Fresh air, Refreshing breeze, Fresh air in the mountains, Comparison with Seoul air, Clean winds blowing from the mountains, Clear sky, Stars, Clean air, Clear view, Crisp air, etc. | Tourism trains, City bus, Parking lot, Valley, Waterfall, Camping ground, Recreation, Scenery, Toilets, Shower room, Experience, Hang-gliding, Paragliding, Boating, Stony path, History, Observatory, Skywalk, Olympics, Recreational forest, Glamping, Railbike, Rides, Rafting, Trekking, etc. | Natural forests, History, Management, Education, Children, Past, Topography, Guidance, Explanation, Instructor, Appearance, Traditional culture, Festivals, Biology, Rural experience, Natural studies, Exhibition, Specimen, Teacher, Exhibition hall, Traditional bridge, Stars, Destruction, Damage, etc. | Butterfly, Native, Plant, Bird, Elk, Owl, Frog, Fish, Egg, Insect, Animal, Fish species, Zooid, Moss, Pulsatilla koreana, Taxus cuspidata, Tree, Pine tree, Mole, Vegetation, Dense, broadleaf tree, etc. |
Classification | Collection Method | Data Type | Application |
---|---|---|---|
AHP | Survey and interview with local residents | Interview content | Used as a basis for validity of AHP survey results |
Survey | Used as a basis for determining the ranking for 10 ES | ||
Sentiment analysis | Blogs and social media | Text | Used for word cloud, interpretation of ES demand through word frequency, and used as the basis for sentiment scores |
Sentiment score per ES | Used as a basis for comparison of demand by each ES category, determining positivity/negativity, and kernel density map weights | ||
Visitors’ coordinates | Used as input data for kernel density maps | ||
Floating population analysis | Statistical Data Center (Statistics Korea, 2020) | Quantity of floating population during weekdays and weekends in March, June, September and December 2020 | Comparison of population density patterns in March, June, September, and December through finding high density areas of floating population and their heatmaps |
Category/ Ecosystem Service | Gariwangsan | Yeoninsan | |
---|---|---|---|
Local Residents | Local Residents | ||
Ecosystem services categories | Rank 1 | Cultural (0.604) | Cultural (0.671) |
Rank 2 | Provisioning (0.247) | Regulating (0.136) | |
Rank 3 | Regulating (0.107) | Provisioning (0.128) | |
Rank 4 | Supporting (0.042) | Supporting (0.065) | |
CI | 0.0975 | 0.0448 | |
Provisioning services | Rank 1 | Water resources supply (0.597) | Non-timber forest products supply (0.742) |
Rank 2 | Non-timber forest products supply (0.344) | Timber supply (0.180) | |
Rank 3 | Timber supply (0.059) | Water resources supply (0.078) | |
CI | 0.0282 | 0.0411 | |
Regulating services | Rank 1 | Water quality regulation (0.594) | Air quality improvement (0.445) |
Rank 2 | Erosion control (0.257) | Water quality regulation (0.391) | |
Rank 3 | Carbon absorption (0.104) | Erosion control (0.119) | |
Rank 4 | Air quality improvement (0.046) | Carbon absorption (0.045) | |
CI | 0.0464 | 0.0412 | |
Cultural services | Rank 1 | Recreation and sightseeing (0.863) | Education about nature (0.671) |
Rank 2 | Education about nature (0.137) | Recreation and sightseeing (0.329) | |
CI | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Rank | Positive | Negative |
---|---|---|
1 | Recreation and sightseeing | Recreation and sightseeing |
2 | Air quality improvement | Biodiversity improvement |
3 | Biodiversity improvement | Water quality regulation |
4 | Water quality regulation | - |
5 | Education about nature | |
6 | Water resource supply | |
7 | Non-timber forest product supply | |
8 | Carbon absorption | |
9 | Timber supply | |
10 | Erosion control |
Rank | Positive | Negative |
---|---|---|
1 | Recreation and sightseeing | Recreation and sightseeing |
2 | Air quality improvement | Biodiversity improvement |
3 | Biodiversity improvement | Water quality regulation |
4 | Water quality regulation | - |
5 | Education about nature | |
6 | Water resource supply | |
7 | Non-timber forest product supply | |
8 | Carbon absorption | |
9 | Timber supply | |
10 | Erosion control |
Month | Gariwangsan | Yeoninsan |
---|---|---|
March | 665,165 | 4,591,984 |
June | 735,763 | 6,750,972 |
September | 714,015 | 6,184,203 |
December | 762,142 | 7,008,791 |
Evaluation Index | AHP | Sentiment Analysis | Floating Population |
---|---|---|---|
Possibility of evaluating individual ES demand | High | Average | Low |
Identifying the absolute amount of demand | Low | Average | High |
Objectivity in quantifying demand | Average | Average | High |
Estimating spatial change of demand | Average | High | High |
Constraints in time taken to collect data (High: longer time, Low: shorter time) | Low | Average | High |
Target of demand survey | Local residents | Potential tourists | Visitors |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jo, J.-H.; Choi, M.; Lee, C.-B.; Lee, K.-h.; Kim, O.S. Comparing Strengths and Weaknesses of Three Approaches in Estimating Social Demands for Local Forest Ecosystem Services in South Korea. Forests 2021, 12, 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040497
Jo J-H, Choi M, Lee C-B, Lee K-h, Kim OS. Comparing Strengths and Weaknesses of Three Approaches in Estimating Social Demands for Local Forest Ecosystem Services in South Korea. Forests. 2021; 12(4):497. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040497
Chicago/Turabian StyleJo, Jang-Hwan, Moongi Choi, Chang-Bae Lee, Kyeong-hak Lee, and Oh Seok Kim. 2021. "Comparing Strengths and Weaknesses of Three Approaches in Estimating Social Demands for Local Forest Ecosystem Services in South Korea" Forests 12, no. 4: 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040497
APA StyleJo, J. -H., Choi, M., Lee, C. -B., Lee, K. -h., & Kim, O. S. (2021). Comparing Strengths and Weaknesses of Three Approaches in Estimating Social Demands for Local Forest Ecosystem Services in South Korea. Forests, 12(4), 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040497