Next Article in Journal
Alteration of Bending Properties of Wood Due to Ammonia Treatment and Additional Densification
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Spatial Boreal Forest Harvesting Practices on Efficiency through a Benchmarking Approach in Eastern Canada
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) Cultivation on Soil Nitrogen Fractions and Mineralization

1
State Key Lab of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 71 East-Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, China
2
College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Qian Z.Z. and Sun X. contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.
Forests 2021, 12(8), 1109; https://doi.org/10.3390/f12081109
Submission received: 27 July 2021 / Revised: 10 August 2021 / Accepted: 17 August 2021 / Published: 19 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Ecology and Management)

Abstract

:
The mineralization of soil organic nitrogen (N) is the key process in the cycling of N in terrestrial ecosystems. Land-use change to bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) cultivation that later entails organic material mulching combined with chemical fertilizer application will inevitably influence soil N mineralization (Nmin) and availability dynamics. However, the soil Nmin rates associated with various N fractions of P. praecox in response to land-use change and mulching are not well understood. The present study aimed to understand the effects of land-use change to P. praecox bamboo cultivation and organic material mulching on soil Nmin and availability. Soil properties and organic N fractions were measured in a P. praecox field planted on former paddy fields, a mulched P. praecox field, and a rice (Oryza sativa L.) field. Soil Nmin was determined using a batch incubation method, with mathematical models used to predict soil Nmin kinetics and potential. The conversion from a paddy field to P. praecox plantation decreased the soil pH, soil total N, and soil organic matter (SOM) content significantly (p < 0.05); the mulching method induced further soil acidification. The mulching treatment significantly augmented the SOM content by 7.08% compared with the no-mulching treatment (p < 0.05), but it decreased soil hydrolyzable N and increased the nonhydrolyzable N (NHN) content. Both the Nmin rate and cumulative mineralized N were lowest in the mulched bamboo field. The kinetics of Nmin was best described by the ‘two-pool model’ and ‘special model’. The Pearson’s correlation analysis and the Mantel test suggested soil pH was the dominant factor controlling the soil cumulative mineralized N and mineralization potential in the bamboo fields. These findings could help us better understand the N cycling and N availability under mulching conditions for shifts in land use, and provide a scientific basis for the sustainable management of bamboo plantations.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen (N) is a limiting factor for the growth and development of plants as well as a robust indicator of soil fertility [1,2]. In terrestrial ecosystems, N mainly exists in organic forms in which its availability is restricted by its chemical composition and structure [3]. Soil organic N can be divided into hydrolyzable N (THN) and nonhydrolyzable N (NHN) components via a chemical extraction method; the forms of THN include ammonium N (AN), amino acid N (AAN), amino sugar N (ASN), and unknown hydrolyzable N (UHN) [4,5]. Because of its rapid turnover and high proportion in soil N, the AAN is considered an important indicator of N cycling and the state of organic matter degradation [6,7]. Accordingly, soil N fractionation is a widely accepted method for identifying the potential bioavailability of nitrogen [8]. Although some THNs can be directly absorbed by plants or assimilated by microorganisms, most soil organic N must first be converted into nitrate N (NO3-N) and ammonium N (NH4+-N) by mineralization before it can be absorbed and utilized by plants [9]. Furthermore, this mineralization process can also affect the dynamics of soil N leaching and its gaseous losses [10]. Thus, N mineralization (Nmin) rates can better convey changes in soil quality and ecosystem functions [11].
Soil Nmin is strongly influenced by various abiotic factors, such as temperature, moisture, pH, and fertility levels [12,13,14]. Moisture and temperature are two well-known major factors controlling Nmin; moreover, Neina [15] reported that Nmin mainly occurs at a pH of 6.5–8. Nitrification is quite sensitive to soil pH values; generally, raising the soil pH can increase the amount of soluble soil organic matter (SOM), which provides C and N substrates for microbes, thereby increasing both microbial diversity and soil enzyme activity [16,17]. Yet, it was also reported that nitrification can occur rapidly within the pH range of 4.5–5.2 [18]. Both the amount and forms of SOM can also have substantial impacts upon Nmin, especially the labile C and N pools, given the positive correlation between the mineralization potential and SOM content [19]. Ros [20] concluded that Nmin is primarily related to the size of SOM and extractable organic matter fractions, whereas those variables corresponding to soil texture and organic matter quality are deemed less important. However earlier, Bechtold and Naiman [21] found that Nmin was maximal in fine-textured soil samples under long-term laboratory incubation, and went on to suggest that particle size influenced the N content and its mineralization. Thus, it is not a single factor that determines Nmin, but rather a variety of factors capable of exerting interactive effects upon Nmin dynamics. In addition to the local environment and soil factors, soil Nmin can vary considerably among locations due to their cultivated plant species and management practices [22]. In particular, land-use changes involving the planting of different species often entail a combination of different forms of management. In this respect, the sudden and heavy input of organic manure and fertilizers (N fertilizer) is especially relevant, as it can seriously affect the amount and the cycling of soil N.
Paddy rice production is one of the traditional land-use systems in South China due to the high population [23], but the increase of the rice yield has inhibited the price of the rice. Therefore, in the last few decades, with the goal of improving the local economy, increasingly more agricultural land in South China is undergoing conversion to Phyllostachys praecox bamboo plantations [24]. Since its shoots are edible by humans, P. praecox is a favored species, and because of its high economic returns, P. praecox plantations are now extensively cultivated in southern China [25]. Intensive management techniques for its cultivation there include organic material mulching, heavy fertilization, and the application of organic manure, all of which are commonly used to increase soil temperatures in winter so as to stimulate the early emergence of bamboo shoots and obtain a premium price when the market supply is low [26]. As reported by other researchers, mulching can foster soil organic matter accumulation and lead to soil acidification, as well as bamboo recession [27,28,29]. In general, the high content of SOM ought to increase the soil Nmin [30], but a low pH could reduce the potential N mineralization rate [31]. Accordingly, the soil Nmin potential of P. praecox plantations can be complicated under conditions of mulching applications, making it hard to predict, especially since it has not yet be robustly elucidated.
Mineralization of soil organic N in bamboo soils is the key process underpinning N nutrition. When land-use change is followed with organic mulching materials combined with chemical fertilizer application, this is apt to influence soil N availability. However, despite the prevalence of bamboo plantations worldwide, how the soil organic N fraction and Nmin rates of P. praecox fields have responded to land-use changes and mulching remain poorly understood. Here we hypothesized that land-use change could significantly change the soil N forms and Nmin of bamboo-cultivated soil. At the same time, the organic material mulching technique would further reduce soil N availability because of severe soil acidification. Therefore, the objectives of this study were: (1) to investigate the effects of bamboo plantation establishment and its organic material mulching on the soil N fraction and Nmin rate; (2) to evaluate the soil N availability potential by using kinetic models of Nmin; (3) to explore the joint, comprehensive impacts of soil organic matter and soil pH upon Nmin. The empirical determination of the soil organic N fraction and Nmin rate advances our understanding of the effects of mulching on N-use efficiency and N cycling in plantation settings. Moreover, it could provide a timely reference for moving closer to the sustainable production of P. praecox in practice.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The soil samples were collected from the Lin’an District of Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China (30°17′17″ N, 119°32′44″ E). The study area is within a subtropical monsoon climate zone, and has an annual precipitation of 1420 mm and an annual average temperature of 15.9 °C. The soil texture is medium loam and the soil type is classified as Anthrosols according to the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization).
An area of about 4 km2 was selected for this study. Due to economic and historical reasons, some of the paddy fields were converted to P. praecox stands in recent years and these two different land-use systems (paddy fields and Phyllostachys praecox plantations) were distributed randomly in this area. P. praecox plantations shared the same soil texture with paddy fields before the conversion of the rice fields into bamboo plantations.

2.2. Experimental Design and Organic Mulching Technique

Our study contained two P. praecox plantations including a mulching treatment (mulched in 2015 and 2017, PM) and a nonmulching treatment (PNM); in this area, the two P. praecox plantations were planted on fields no longer used for rice paddy farming since 2010. The bamboo culm density of the PM and PNM was 1.51 stems m2 and 1.31 stems m2, respectively; the mean diameter at breast height of the P. praecox bamboo in the PM and PNM was 4.67 cm and 3.65 cm, respectively. The still-farmed paddy field (PS) was randomly chosen as a control. Within each treatment, three plots (each 200 m2) were established for sampling. For the paddy field, the fertilization rate was 375 kg N ha−1 year−1 and the rice was harvested in early November of each year. For the P. praecox plantation without mulching, its fertilization rate was 150 kg N ha−1 year−1. For the P. praecox plantation with mulching, an organic material mulching technique was applied. In brief, this mulching involved placing 10–15 cm of rice straw (42.18% organic carbon (OC), 0.78% total N (TN)) on the soil surface, then adding 10–15 cm of rice husks (35.86% OC, 0.47% TN) to form a thick mulch. The yearly application amount of these mulching materials was equivalent to 40 Mg ha−1 of rice straw and 55 Mg ha−1 of rice husk. In the present study, the mulching period started in December and terminated in March of the next year. After March, the mulching materials were removed as much as possible. A high fertilization rate, comprising 1125 kg ha−1 of urea and 2250 kg ha−1 of complex fertilizer (N–P–K: 16–16–16), was applied every year prior to mulching.

2.3. Soil Sampling and Sample Assay

All the soil samples were collected in November 2018. The soil (0–20 cm depth) was collected from five randomly selected locations within each plot and combined to form a composite sample. These nine soil samples were air-dried, ground, and sieved for their later analysis. Soil pH was measured in 1:2.5 (w/v) distilled deionized water by a FE28-Standard pH meter (METTLER TOLEDO Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China); SOM was determined by the heating digestion method with 5% K2Cr2O7 and H2SO4 [32]. Soil TN was determined by the Kjeldahl method; soil NH4+-N and NO3-N were each extracted by 2 M KCL and respectively quantified by indophenol blue colorimetry and dual wavelength colorimetry [33]. The soil basic properties of the three sites are summarized in Table 1.

2.4. Incubation Experiment and Measurement of Soil Nitrogen Mineralization

An aerobic incubation method with intermittent leaching was used to determine N mineralization (Nmin) [34]. Briefly, a layer of glass wool was first placed at the bottom of a 50-mL cylinder vial, then quartz sand (15 g) was added on top of it, and another layer of glass wool placed on that sand, above which a homogeneous mixed sample of air-dried soil (15 g) and quartz sand (20 g) filled the cylinder vial; atop it, a layer of glass wool and quartz sand (15 g) were added to prevent the soil sample from splashing. Both the glass wool and quartz sand were pretreated with acid. The soil samples (n = 3) were adjusted to 60% of field water capacity [35], sealed, and incubated at 35 °C in an LRH-80 incubator (Juchuang Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China). At days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, and 56, the soil samples were leached with 100 mL of 0.01 M CaCl2; this was done four times, followed with 20 mL of a nutrient solution devoid of N (0.002 M CaSO4·2H2O; 0.002 M MgSO4; 0.005 M Ca(H2PO4)2·H2O; 0.0025 M K2SO4). After the leaching, the excess water was removed under 8 kPa negative pressure; all the leachate was collected for the determination of NH4+-N and NO3-N.

2.5. Soil Organic Nitrogen Fractionation

Forms of soil organic N were identified from the hydrolysate prepared by refluxing the soil with 6 M HCl in a 120 °C oil bath, for 12 h [36]. The different soil organic N fractionations were measured according to Wang et al. [37]. Total hydrolyzable N (THN) was determined by steam distillation with 10 M NaOH after the Kjeldahl digestion of the acid hydrolysate. Nonhydrolyzable N (NHN) was calculated as follows:
  NHN = Total   N THN
Hydrolyzable ammonium N (AN) was measured by steam distillation with 3.5% (w/v) MgO. Amino sugar N (ASN) was calculated as the difference between the AN value and that obtained from steam distillation of the hydrolysate with a phosphate–borate buffer at pH = 11.2. Amino acid N (AAN) was also determined by steam distillation. This was with an aliquot of the hydrolysate with a phosphate–borate buffer and 5 M NaOH, after heating the 0.5 M NaOH at 100 °C to decompose the hexosamines and remove NH3-N; with ninhydrin powder added to convert the amino-N to NH3-N. The amount of unknown hydrolyzable N (UHN) was calculated as follows:
  UHN = THN ( AN   +   ASN   +   AAN )

2.6. Models of Nitrogen Mineralization Kinetics

Four models may be used to fit Nmin kinetics according to Li et al. [38]. There is the effective accumulated temperature model:
  Y = k ( ( T T 0 ) D ) n
where, Y is the cumulative amount of N mineralized (mg N kg−1), T0 is set to 15 °C [39], T is the incubation temperature, D is the incubation time in days, while k and n are the mineralization constants.
The single first-order exponential model (‘one-pool model’) has this form:
N t = N 0 ( 1 e k 0 t )
where, Nt is the cumulative amount of N mineralized over time t (mg N kg−1), N0 denotes the potentially mineralizable N, while k0 is the first-order rate coefficient [34].
The double first-order exponential model (‘two-pool model’) has this form:
N t = N a ( 1 e k a t ) + N r ( 1 e k r t )
where, Na and ka represent the N potential and the first-order rate coefficient of the readily available fraction, respectively; the Nr and kr are the corresponding N potential and the first-order rate coefficient of the resistant matter fraction, respectively [40].
Finally, the mixed first- and zero-order model (‘special model’) has this form:
N t = N a 0   ( 1 e k a 0 t ) + C r t
where, Cr is the constant decomposition rate of the resistant matter fraction, while both Na0 and ka0 terms are the same as those defined for the two-pool model just above [41].

2.7. Data Analysis

The data were calculated and plotted using Origin 2019 software (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA). Each response variable was subjected to a one-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) using IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA); differences between the three site treatments were evaluated by Duncan’s multiple range test at a significance level of 0.05. Before the statistical analysis, the obtained data was validated and fitted for normal distribution. Using nonlinear regression, the mineralization parameters were estimated from the cumulative amounts of extracted NH4+ and NO3 over the incubation time, this was done separately for all four models. The linear correlation between two variables was determined by Pearson’s r coefficient. A 999-permutation Mantel test was used to test the relationships among soil properties and soil cumulative mineralized N, and performed using the “Vegan” packages in R v 4.0.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

3. Results

3.1. Basic Soil Properties of Bamboo Plantations

As Table 1 shows, the pH of the surface layer soil (0–20 cm) in the PS was decreased significantly after initial conversion to the P. praecox bamboo plantation (p < 0.05), and the mulching significantly decreased the pH of PNM by 15.79% (p < 0.05). Similarly, the SOM content decreased significantly after conversion from paddy field to bamboo plantation (p < 0.05), but the mulching significantly increased the SOM content of PNM by 7.08% (p < 0.05). The TN content ranged from 2.08 to 2.59 g kg−1 among all three treatment sites, being significantly higher in the PS than the two established bamboo plantations (p < 0.05). Although the NO3-N and NH4+-N contents were increased after mulching, the highest content of NO3-N and NH4+-N was observed in the PM, not the PNM treatment. In addition, NH4+-N accounted for the majority of mineralized N at PS, while the mineralized N was dominated by NO3-N at the two P. praecox plantations. The C/N ratio ranged from 9.53 to 10.20 among the three treatments.

3.2. Soil Organic Nitrogen Fractions

The soil THN of PS, PNM, and PM site treatments accounted for 74.90%, 75.72%, and 75.11% of the TN content, respectively. The THN content ranged from 1564 to 1940 mg kg−1 (Figure 1), and it was significantly higher in the PS than P. praecox soils (p < 0.05). With mulching applied, the soil THN content decreased whereas the soil NHN content increased, but no significant difference was detected between PNM and PM (p > 0.05). The AAN content ranged from 532.1 to 819.6 mg kg−1 among the three site treatments. With conversion of the paddy field to a P. praecox bamboo plantation, the soil’s AAN content and proportion decreased significantly (p < 0.05), but then slightly increased with mulching applied (Figure 2B); however, the proportion of THN consisting of AAN was similar between PNM and PM (Figure 2A). After establishing the P. praecox plantations, their AN and ASN proportions of THN had both increased significantly (p < 0.05), but the AN and ASN contents did not differ significantly between the bamboo plantations. For the UHN content, its ranking was PS > PNM > PM. Across the site treatments, the content of the organic N fractions had this general ranking: AAN (532–820 mg kg−1) > AN (434–480 mg kg−1) ≈ UHN (457–498 mg kg−1) > ASN (147–171 mg kg−1).

3.3. Soil Nitrogen Mineralization

As Figure 3 shows, the total amount of N mineralized during the 56-day incubation varied significantly among the different treatments (p < 0.05), being greatest in PS at 191.1 mg kg−1, while the mineralized N of PNM and PM amounted to 128.8 and 95.48 mg kg−1, respectively. Similarly, the soil Nmin rate decreased significantly after converting the paddy field to a P. praecox bamboo plantation (p < 0.05), being significantly reduced by mulching as well (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the process of Nmin mainly happened during the first 2 weeks and declined with time, and by day 21 of the incubation period a higher mineralization rate characterized the PNM. Across all treatments, the mineralized N of the first 2 weeks (N14) ranged from 52.51 to 138.0 mg kg−1 and the ratio of N14 to Nt (total mineralized N) during the incubation period fell by 49.76%–72.25% (Table 2). The cumulative mineralized N was mainly dominated by NH4+-N, in that it accounted for 85.47%, 72.78%, and 75.87% of the total mineralized N in PS, PNM, and PM, respectively.

3.4. Model Fitting of N Mineralization Kinetics

As seen in Figure 4, the effective accumulated temperature, one-pool, two-pool, and special models, all provided a very good fit to the data according to their R2 (R2-values: 0.989–1.000), and their estimated model parameters are listed in Table 3. In the effective accumulated temperature model, the k value (i.e., the mineralization capacity) of the paddy field significantly exceeded that of either P. praecox plantation, which matched the trend in the variation of cumulative Nmin. In the one-pool model, the N0 value surpassed its Nt (Table 2) in the PNM and PM, but not in the PS treatment, and the trend in the variation of N0 (i.e., potentially mineralizable N) was on par with Nt among all the treatments; the k0 values ranged from 0.044 to 0.1 d−1. In the two-pool model, the value of Na (i.e., N potential of the readily available fraction) was significantly higher than that of Nr (i.e., N potential of the resistant matter fraction). In the special model, the Na0 values ranged almost threefold, from 50.44 to 146.1 mg kg−1, and their pattern resembled that found for Na in the two-pool model; indeed, the special model gave a similarly good fit to empirical data as the two-pool model.

3.5. Relationship between N Mineralization Kinetics Parameters with Soil Properties

The obtained correlation coefficients between the Nmin kinetics parameters and SOM, soil TN, NH4+-N, NO3-N, and organic N fractions are shown in Table 4. Significant correlations emerged between the cumulative mineralized N and most of the indicators assessed. In particular, the N0, Na, and Na0 were correlated with many indicators, while relatively few indicators were significantly correlated with the mineralization potential parameters Nr and Cr, and the rate constants (k0, ka, kr, ka0). Soil pH, SOM, TN, THN, and AAN were each significantly and positively correlated with Nt and the mineralization potential, whereas they were poorly correlated with the mineralization potential parameters Nr and Cr of the resistant matter fraction. Both NH4+-N and NO3-N had significant negative correlations with Nt and the mineralization potential; by contrast, ASN, AN, and NHN had relatively little influence on the soil Nmin parameter.
As revealed by the Mantel test (Table 5), the soil pH value, SOM, soil AAN content, TN, NH4+-N, and NO3-N content exerted a significant impact on soil cumulative mineralized N, wherein TN (r = 0.9839, p = 0.001), NH4+-N (r = 0.9720, p = 0.001), and the pH value (r = 0.9549, p = 0.001) were the primary drivers.

4. Discussion

It is well known that land-use changes as well as forest management practices can greatly alter the properties of soil [11,42]. Our results suggest the conversion from paddy field to P. praecox bamboo plantation could decrease soil pH considerably, which is consistent with findings reported by Holubík et al. [43]. In addition, the mulching practice further induced soil acidification, likely due to the heavy application of chemical fertilizer and phenolic acids excreted from the decomposition of organic materials in the mulch [28]. It is widely accepted now that land-use change can markedly change SOM content in soils [44]. Our results showed that mulching can increase the SOM in a bamboo plantation, an outcome largely driven by the direct input from organic materials [45]. Nevertheless, the mulched bamboo plantation showed less SOM than the paddy field. This result could be explained in two ways. First, the soil organic carbon (SOC) of bamboo stands with mulching mostly exists in unstable forms that are not conducive to preservation [46,47]. Second, the waterlogging condition in a paddy field generally promotes the preservation and fixation of SOC [48]. The decline of TN in soils of the bamboo without mulching mainly arose from the reduction in fertilization and rapid growth of P. praecox. We found that NH4+-N made up most of the mineralized N present in rice paddy soil, which could have resulted from waterlogging that inhibited bacterial nitrification activities, thereby preventing NH3 volatilization and NO3-N denitrification losses. This would have created an environment suitable for soil organic Nmin, enabling the accumulation of NH4+-N [49]. In stark contrast, the higher proportion of NO3-N present in both P. praecox plantations might be linked to their high N fertilization input and better ventilation [50,51].
Adding organic material can change soil environmental conditions and increase the N inputs into soil [52], for which the N forms and fractions are important factors affecting the overall N availability in soils [53]. In this context, the THN is often classified as labile soil organic N while the NHN is considered as stable organic N [54]; our study revealed the sensitivity of labile fractions of soil to land-use change (from a paddy field to a bamboo plantation). The AAN accounted for 25.64%–31.66% of the TN among different site treatments, a result consistent with Stevenson [55], who found AAN comprised approximately 20%–30% of the soil TN. Free amino acids can be absorbed by plants and assimilated directly by soil microorganisms [56,57], so mulching had a negligible impact on the AAN content. However, AN and ASN are more labile than the other two fractions of hydrolyzable soil N, and both play vital roles in the mineralization process [58,59]. Mulching led to a marked improvement in the AN and ASN contents, but still, the stable fractions accumulated to a higher level than did the labile N fraction in the mulched bamboo plantation (Figure 1). A plausible reason for why that happened, is that the mineralization rate of NHN was too low, which would have driven an accumulation in soil. Furthermore, the low soil pH of P. praecox likely augmented the soil exchangeable aluminum (Al) and organic complexed Al, which would have contributed to the accumulation of stable organic N [60]. In general, increasing the soil organic N content will necessarily influence aspects of soil N cycling to some extent, namely the mineralization rate [61]. However, due to the higher accumulation of NHN, the effects of mulching on Nmin could be rather complicated.
Soil organic N is ammonified by soil microbes into NH4+-N, followed by its nitrification. The ensuing NO3-N is more mobile than labile organic N forms such as AAN, which can easily diffuse into the rhizosphere and is available for plant uptake [62,63]. Accordingly, soil Nmin is the main index of the N supply capacity of soil. Nonetheless, the application of organic materials in excessive amounts onto soil could strongly affect its N cycling dynamics [64,65]. In our study, the paddy field had a significantly higher mineralization rate and mineralized amount than did the two bamboo plantations. Perhaps this was because the paddy field had a more suitable pH—since the optimum soil pH for ammonification reportedly ranges from about pH 6.0 to 8.0 [66], and the highest TN content was also observed in the paddy field, according to the Mantel test, so TN, NH4+-N and pH were the key factors influencing the soil cumulative mineralized N (Table 5). The lowest ratio of Nt/TN was observed in the PM (Table 2), which indicated the organic material mulching diminished the capacity for soil mineralization, for which Nt and pH were evidently positively correlated (Table 4). Moreover, soil pH plays a key role in modulating the relative abundance and diversity of belowground bacterial communities [67]. Chen et al. [68] reported that soil bacterial diversity and soil urease activity decreased after multiple times of mulching of a P. praecox plantation, and they went on to predict a lower functional diversity of soil bacterial microbiomes related to the cycling of amino acids and carbohydrates after long-term mulching. Therefore, we believe mulching slightly increased the labile soil organic N, but because the diversity of soil microorganisms was reduced, the stable organic N pool increased, resulting in the low Nmin of P. praecox plantations (Figure 3). Our study highlights that soil Nmin is restricted by soil pH. Under low pH conditions, the enhancement from fertilization and organic matter fails to increase the soil Nmin capacity and this could reduce the N-use efficiency.
It is widely accepted that Nmin reactions generally follow first-order kinetics [69]. According to the k value (the mineralization capacity, Table 3), the effective cumulated temperature model yielded a sound prediction for the paddy field, but neither the k nor n value can be used to directly calculate the potential of Nmin [38]. Although both k and n values did show good correlations with soil properties and organic N fractions, the effective cumulated temperature model seemed ill suited for the P. praecox plantation. In the fitted one-pool model, the value for the mineralization potential N0 was significantly correlated with the soil properties and THN, which may convey the maximal potential of soil Nmin. Yet the N0 value was about 96.33% of the experimental data (Nt), and over time the N0 value should surpass the observed mineral N. Our results agree with Li et al. [70], who suggested the one-pool model was not suitable for predicting the mineralization potential of rice paddy soil. In earlier work, Serna and Pomares [71] developed the parameter N0 × k0 to convey the soil N supply capacity; here, the N0 × k0 values of PS, PNM, and PM respectively were 18.48, 6.01, 5.34, and 5.55 mg kg−1 d−1, hence, these can better indicate the N supply capacity of the different site treatments. Based on their goodness-of-fit (R2 values) the two-pool and special models outperformed the other two models. Crucially, the two-pool model and special model each divide the soil mineralizable organic N into two realistic parts: the readily available N pools and resistant-matter (i.e., slowly decomposing) N pools [72]. In the two-pool model the mineralization capacity and rate of the two types of N pools are different, and, unlike the two-pool model, in the special model the mineralization amount of slowly decomposing N pools is linearly correlated with the incubation time. Based on our results for the fitted two-pool model, the size of readily available N pools across the three site treatments was significantly lower than that of their slowly decomposing N pools, which suggested the latter had a greater impact on the total mineralization potential. However, Nr featured the worst correlations with soil properties and organic N fractions. Our results support the recent findings of Zhang et al. [73], who argued the special model’s Na0 parameter could be used as an index to evaluate the soil N supply capacity. Both ka0 and Cr were also weakly correlated with soil properties and organic N fractions in the special model. To sum up, all four models gave respectable fits to the data, but the kinetics of Nmin were described more accurately by the two-pool model or special model.
Confirming our hypothesis, the conversion from paddy field to P. praecox bamboo plantation can lead to soil acidification and reductions in soil nutrients, the THN and NHN contents, and soil N mineralization as well. The practice of mulching further lowered the soil pH and raised the NHN content, which inhibited both the rate and capacity of soil Nmin. Hence, a suitable pH seems to be crucial for sustaining the long-term soil N supply in bamboo plantations and bamboo management.
In this study, we are aware of the limitation between the laboratory incubation for N mineralization and an in situ incubation for Nmin. Furthermore, the risk of N leaching is substantial given the heavy on-site fertilization, low soil TN and high soil NO3-N content under the mulched P. praecox bamboo plantation. This aspect deserves further attention, and we recommend that future in situ research investigate soil N transformations under mulching conditions to mitigate that potential environmental risk.

5. Conclusions

Our results indicated the conversion from rice paddy field to P. praecox plantation could significantly decrease the soil’s pH value, as well as its TN and SOM content. Land-use change significantly decreased the THN and NHN, and later mulching reduced the THN yet increased the NHN content. The cumulative mineralized N and Nmin rate ranked as follows: PS > PNM > PM. Further, Nmin mainly occurred within the initial 2 weeks of incubation and then declined over time. The mineralized N was dominated primarily by NH4+-N rather than NO3-N. Although all four kinetics models could be fitted well to the experimental data of Nmin, the two-pool and special models best described its kinetics. Our works revealed that soil pH value, SOM, TN, THN, and AAN were all significantly positively correlated with the cumulative mineralized N and mineralization potential, but vice versa for NH4+-N and NO3-N. Besides, the Mantel test suggested that TN, NH4+-N, and the pH value were the primary drivers of cumulative mineralized N. Taken together, we may infer that soil pH exerted the greatest impact on soil Nmin in the mulched bamboo plantation. These findings could foster a better understanding of N cycling and N availability under land-use change and mulching conditions, and contribute to developing a scientific basis for the sustainable management of P. praecox plantations not only in China but perhaps elsewhere, too.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.S. and S.Z.; methodology, X.S. and J.G.; software, Z.Q. and J.G.; validation, X.S. and Z.Q.; formal analysis, S.Z. and Z.Q.; investigation, X.S. and S.Z.; resources, S.Z.; data curation, Z.Q.; writing—Original draft preparation, Z.Q.; writing—Review and editing, X.S., S.Z. and Z.Q.; visualization, Z.Q. and J.G.; supervision, S.Z.; project administration, S.Z.; funding acquisition, S.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We thank the National Key R & D Project of China (2016FEE001111), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41671296), and the National Key R & D Program of China (2016FYE0112700) for financial supports.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Li, M.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, Q.; Cheng, X. Consequences of afforestation for soil nitrogen dynamics in central China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 183, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shan, Z.; Yin, Z.; Yang, H.; Zuo, C.; Zhu, T. Long-Term cultivation of fruit plantations decreases mineralization and nitrification rates in calcareous soil in the Karst Region in Southwestern China. Forests 2020, 11, 1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schulten, H.R.; Schnitzer, M. The chemistry of soil organic nitrogen: A review. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1997, 26, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bremner, J.M. Inorganic forms of nitrogen. In Methods of Soil Analysis; Black, C.A., Ed.; American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 1965; pp. 1179–1237. [Google Scholar]
  5. Stevenson, F.J. Organic Forms of Soil Nitrogen; Nitrogen in Agricultural Soils: Madison, WI, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  6. Burdige, D.J.; Martens, C.S. Biogeochemical cycling in an organic-rich coastal marine basin: 10. The role of amino acids in sedimentary carbon and nitrogen cycling. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1988, 52, 1571–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jones, D.L.; Kielland, K. Soil amino acid turnover dominates the nitrogen flux in permafrost-dominated taiga forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2002, 34, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, Y.C.; Shen, Q.R.; Ran, W. Content and distribution of forms of organic N in soil and particle size fractions after long-term fertilization. Chemosphere 2003, 50, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, J.; Zhuang, S.; Zhu, Z. Soil organic nitrogen composition and mineralization of paddy soils in a cultivation chronosequence in china. J. Soil Sediment. 2017, 17, 1588–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, R.; El-Naggar, A.; Li, Y.; Cai, Y.; Chang, S.X. Converting rice husk to biochar reduces bamboo soil N2O emissions under different forms and rates of nitrogen additions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 28777–28788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Haghverdi, K.; Kooch, Y. Soil carbon and nitrogen fractions in response to land use/cover changes. Acta Oecol. 2020, 109, 103659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Veresoglou, S.D.; Sen, R.; Mamolos, A.P.; Veresoglou, D.S. Plant species identity and arbuscular mycorrhizal status modulate potential nitrification rates in nitrogen-limited grassland soils. J. Ecol. 2011, 99, 1339–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guntiñas, M.E.; Leirós, M.C.; Trasar-Cepeda, C.; Gil-Sotres, F. Effects of moisture and temperature on net soil nitrogen mineralization: A laboratory study. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2012, 48, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fu, H.; Duan, Y.H.; Zhu, P.; Gao, H.J.; Xu, M.G.; Yang, X.M. Potential N mineralization and availability to maize in black soils in response to soil fertility improvement in Northeast China. J. Soil Sediment. 2021, 21, 905–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Neina, D. The role of soil pH in plant nutrition and soil remediation. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2019, 2019, 5794869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Curtin, D.; Campbell, C.A.; Jalil, A. Effects of acidity on mineralization: pH-dependence of organic matter mineralization in weakly acidic soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1998, 30, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Feyissa, A.; Yang, F.; Wu, J.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, D.; Cheng, X. Soil nitrogen dynamics at a regional scale along a precipitation gradient in secondary grassland of China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 781, 146736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zebarth, B.J.; Forge, T.A.; Goyer, C.; Brin, L.D. Effect of soil acidification on nitrification in soil. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2015, 95, 359363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cookson, W.R.; Abaye, D.A.; Marschner, P.; Murphy, D.V.; Stockdale, E.A.; Goulding, K.W.T. The contribution of soil organic matter fractions to carbon and nitrogen mineralization and microbial community size and structure. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2005, 37, 1726–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ros, G.H. Predicting soil N mineralization using organic matter fractions and soil properties: A re-analysis of literature data. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 45, 132–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bechtold, J.S.; Naiman, R.J. Soil texture and nitrogen mineralization potential across a riparian toposequence in a semi-arid savanna. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 1325–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ollivier, J.; Töwe, S.; Bannert, A.; Hai, B.; Kastl, E.M.; Meyer, A.; Su, M.X.; Kleineidam, K.; Schloter, M. Nitrogen turnover in soil and global change. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2011, 78, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Zhang, T.; Li, Y.; Chang, S.X.; Jiang, P.; Zhou, G.; Zhang, J.; Liu, J. Responses of seasonal and diurnal soil CO2 effluxes to land-use change from paddy fields to Lei bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) stands. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 77, 856–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, J.S.; Jiang, P.K.; Chang, S.X.; Xu, Q.F.; Lin, Y. Dissolved soil organic carbon and nitrogen were affected by conversion of native forests to plantations in subtropical China. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2010, 90, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, H.; Qian, Z.; Zhuang, S. Effects of soil temperature, water content, species, and fertilization on soil respiration in bamboo forest in subtropical China. Forests 2019, 11, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Qian, Z.Z.; Zhuang, S.Y.; Gui, R.Y.; Tang, L.Z. Effect of soil aeration treatment on the physiological and biochemical characteristics of Phyllostachys praecox under the organic material mulching. Plant Soil 2021, 459, 357–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jiang, P.K.; Xu, Q.F.; Xu, Z.H.; Cao, Z.H. Seasonal changes in soil labile organic carbon pools within a Phyllostachys praecox stand under high rate fertilization and winter mulch in subtropical China. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2006, 236, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jiang, P.; Ye, Z.; Xu, Q. Effect of mulching on soil chemical properties and enzyme activities in bamboo plantation of Phyllostachy praecox. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan Anal. 2002, 33, 3135–3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gui, R.; Sun, X.; Zhuang, S. Soil acidification in Phyllostachys praecox f. preveynalis cultivation with intensive management. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan Anal. 2013, 44, 3235–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Silgram, M.; Shepherd, M. The effects of cultivation on soil nitrogen mineralization. Adv. Agron. 1999, 65, 267–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shi, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Xu, Z.; He, C.; Sheng, L.; Liu, H.Y.; Wang, Z. Shift in nitrogen transformation in peatland soil by nitrogen inputs. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 764, 142924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Walkley, A.; Black, I.A. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934, 37, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lu, R.K. Analytical Methods for Soil and Agro-Chemistry; China Agricultural Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 1999. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  34. Stanford, G.; Smith, S.L. Nitrogen mineralization potentials of soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 1972, 36, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, Z.; Li, Y.; Chang, S.X.; Xu, Q.; Li, Y.; Ma, Z.; Qin, H.; Cai, Y. Linking enhanced soil nitrogen mineralization to increased fungal decomposition capacity with Moso bamboo invasion of broadleaf forests. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 771, 144779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Stevenson, F.J. Nitrogen-organic forms. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3 Chemical Methods; Bigham, J.M., Ed.; Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 1996; pp. 1185–1200. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, S.; Jiao, L.; Jin, X.; Niu, D. Characteristics of organic nitrogen fractions in sediments of the shallow lakes in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River area in China. Water Environ. J. 2012, 26, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, H.; Han, Y.; Cai, Z. Nitrogen mineralization in paddy soils of the Taihu Region of China under anaerobic conditions: Dynamics and model fitting. Geoderma 2003, 115, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhu, Z.L. Nitrogen mineralization and prediction of nitrogen availability of Taihu region. Acta Pedol. Sin. 1982, 21, 29–36. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  40. Richter, J.; Nuske, A.; Boehmer, U.; Wehrmann, J. Simulation of nitrogen mineralization and transport in Loess-Parabrownearthes: Plot experiments. Plant Soil 1980, 54, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lindemann, W.C.; Connell, G.; Urquart, N.S. Previous sludge addition effect on nitrogen mineralization in freshly amends soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1988, 52, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Song, Y.; Yao, Y.F.; Qin, X.; Wei, X.R.; Jia, X.X.; Shao, M.G. Response of carbon and nitrogen to afforestation from 0 to 5 m depth on two semiarid cropland soils with contrasting inorganic carbon concentrations. Geoderma 2020, 357, 113940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Holubík, O.; Podrázský, V.; Vopravil, J.; Khel, T.; Remeš, J. Effect of agricultural lands afforestation and tree species composition on the soil reaction, total organic carbon and nitrogen content in the uppermost mineral soil profile. Soil Water Res. 2014, 9, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Don, A.; Schumacher, J.; Freibauer, A. Impact of tropical land-use change on soil organic carbon stocks—A meta analysis. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2011, 17, 1658–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Zhang, Y.; Jiang, P.; Li, Y.; Wu, J.; Xu, K.; Hill, S.; Wang, H. Chemistry of decomposing mulching materials and the effect on soil carbon dynamics under a Phyllostachys praecox bamboo stand. J. Soil Sediment. 2013, 13, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, Y.; Jiang, P.; Chang, S.X.; Wu, J.; Lin, L. Organic mulch and fertilization affect soil carbon pools and forms under intensively managed bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) forests in southeast China. J. Soil Sediment. 2010, 10, 739–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, T.; Li, Y.; Chang, S.X.; Jiang, P.; Zhou, G.; Liu, J.; Lin, L. Converting paddy fields to Lei bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) stands affected soil nutrient concentrations, labile organic carbon pools, and organic carbon chemical compositions. Plant Soil 2013, 367, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pan, G.; Li, L.; Wu, L.; Zhang, X. Storage and sequestration potential of topsoil organic carbon in China’s paddy soils. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2003, 10, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, S.; Ai, S.; He, H. Soil’s nitrogen mineralization processes under continuously waterlogged incubation conditions. Acta Univ. Agric. Boreali-Occident. 1999, 27, 1–5. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  50. Cameron, K.C.; Di, H.J.; Moir, J.L. Nitrogen losses from the soil/plant system: A review. Ann. Appl. Boil. 2013, 162, 145–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, Q.; Qi, L.; Hu, X.; Zhang, Y. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on nitrification and denitrification in Phyllostachys edulis forests. J. Nanjing For. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2017, 41, 82–88. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kader, M.A.; Senge, M.; Mojid, M.A.; Ito, K. Recent advances in mulching materials and methods for modifying soil environment. Soil Tillage Res. 2017, 168, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, Q.C.; Wang, G.H.; Xie, W.X. Soil organic N forms and N supply as affected by fertilization under intensive rice cropping system. Pedosphere 2006, 16, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rovira, P.; Vallejo, V.R. Labile and recalcitrant pools of carbon and nitrogen in organic matter decomposing at different depths in soil: An acid hydrolysis approach. Geoderma 2002, 107, 109–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Stevenson, F.J. Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  56. Geisseler, D.; Horwath, W.R.; Joergensen, R.G.; Ludwig, B. Pathways of nitrogen utilization by soil microorganisms—A review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 2058–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Farzadfar, S.; Knight, J.D.; Congreves, K.A. Soil organic nitrogen: An overlooked but potentially significant contribution to crop nutrition. Plant Soil 2021, 462, 7–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mulvaney, R.; Khan, S.; Hoeft, R.; Brown, H. A soil organic nitrogen fraction that reduces the need for nitrogen fertilization. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2001, 65, 1164–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, L.; Li, S. Nitrogen mineralization from animal manures and its relation to organic N fractions. J. Integr. Agric. 2014, 13, 2040–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wu, S.; Suo, Y.; Liang, G.; Zheng, Z.; Xu, Z.; Lu, S. Soil acidification and buffering capacity of bamboo plantation soils under intensive cultivation management. Chin. J. Soil Sci. 2012, 43, 1120–1125. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  61. Yan, E.R.; Wang, X.H.; Huang, J.J.; Li, G.Y.; Zhou, W. Decline of soil nitrogen mineralization and nitrification during forest conversion of evergreen broad-leaved forest to plantations in the subtropical area of Eastern China. Biogeochemistry 2008, 89, 239–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Miller, A.J.; Cramer, M.D. Root nitrogen acquisition and assimilation. Plant Soil 2005, 274, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jämtgård, S.; Näsholm, T.; Huss-Danell, K. Characteristics of amino acid uptake in barley. Plant Soil 2008, 302, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Aulakh, M.S.; Doran, J.W.; Walters, D.T.; Mosier, A.R.; Francis, D.D. Crop residue type and placement effects on denitrification and mineralization. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1991, 55, 1020–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Baggs, E.M.; Rees, R.M.; Smith, K.A.; Vinten, A.J.A. Nitrous oxide emission from soils after incorporating crop residues. Soil Use Manag. 2000, 16, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Aciego Pietri, J.C.; Brookes, P.C. Nitrogen mineralisation along a pH gradient of a silty loam UK soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rousk, J.; Bååth, E.; Brookes, P.C.; Lauber, C.L.; Lozupone, C.; Caporaso, J.G.; Knight, R.; Fierer, N. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J. 2010, 4, 1340–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Chen, J.; Wu, Q.; Li, S.; Ge, J.; Liang, C.; Qin, H.; Xu, Q.; Fuhrmann, J.J. Diversity and function of soil bacterial communities in response to long-term intensive management in a subtropical bamboo forest. Geoderma 2019, 354, 113894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rasouli-Sadaghiani, M.H.; Moradi, N. Effect of poultry, cattle, sheep manures and sewage sludge on N mineralisation. Chem. Ecol. 2014, 30, 666–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, H.; Han, Y.; Roelcke, M.; Cai, Z. Net nitrogen mineralization in typical paddy soils of the Taihu Region of China under aerobic conditions: Dynamics and model fitting. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2008, 88, 719731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Serna, M.D.; Pomares, F. Nitrogen mineralization of sludge-amended soil. Bioresour. Technol. 1992, 39, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Nendel, C.; Reuter, S. Kinetics of net nitrogen mineralisation from soil-applied grape residues. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2007, 79, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhang, Y.; Xu, W.; Duan, P.; Cong, Y.; An, T.; Yu, N.; Zou, H.; Dang, X.; An, J.; Fan, Q.; et al. Evaluation and simulation of nitrogen mineralization of paddy soils in Mollisols area of Northeast China under waterlogged incubation. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The content of total hydrolyzable N and nonhydrolyzable N in soils for the paddy field, P. plantation without mulching and P. plantation with mulching sites. PS, rice paddy soil; PNM, Phyllostachys praecox plantation without mulching; PM, P. praecox plantation with mulching. Bars are the mean ± standard error (n = 3). Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test at the 0.05 level.
Figure 1. The content of total hydrolyzable N and nonhydrolyzable N in soils for the paddy field, P. plantation without mulching and P. plantation with mulching sites. PS, rice paddy soil; PNM, Phyllostachys praecox plantation without mulching; PM, P. praecox plantation with mulching. Bars are the mean ± standard error (n = 3). Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test at the 0.05 level.
Forests 12 01109 g001
Figure 2. The proportion (A) and content (B) of different organic nitrogen fractions for the paddy field, P. plantation without mulching and P. plantation with mulching sites. PS, rice paddy soil; PNM, Phyllostachys praecox plantation without mulching; PM, P. praecox plantation with mulching. Bars are the mean ± standard error (n = 3). Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test at the 0.05 level.
Figure 2. The proportion (A) and content (B) of different organic nitrogen fractions for the paddy field, P. plantation without mulching and P. plantation with mulching sites. PS, rice paddy soil; PNM, Phyllostachys praecox plantation without mulching; PM, P. praecox plantation with mulching. Bars are the mean ± standard error (n = 3). Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test at the 0.05 level.
Forests 12 01109 g002
Figure 3. The cumulative nitrogen mineralization (A) and mineralization rate (B) for the paddy field, P. plantation without mulching and P. plantation with mulching sites. PS, rice paddy soil; PNM, Phyllostachys praecox plantation without mulching; PM, P. praecox plantation with mulching. Bars are the mean ± standard error (n = 3).
Figure 3. The cumulative nitrogen mineralization (A) and mineralization rate (B) for the paddy field, P. plantation without mulching and P. plantation with mulching sites. PS, rice paddy soil; PNM, Phyllostachys praecox plantation without mulching; PM, P. praecox plantation with mulching. Bars are the mean ± standard error (n = 3).
Forests 12 01109 g003
Figure 4. The cumulative nitrogen mineralization for the paddy field, P. plantation without mulching and P. plantation with mulching sites. PS, rice paddy soil; PNM, Phyllostachys praecox plantation without mulching; PM, P. praecox plantation with mulching. Bars are the mean ± standard error (n = 3).
Figure 4. The cumulative nitrogen mineralization for the paddy field, P. plantation without mulching and P. plantation with mulching sites. PS, rice paddy soil; PNM, Phyllostachys praecox plantation without mulching; PM, P. praecox plantation with mulching. Bars are the mean ± standard error (n = 3).
Forests 12 01109 g004
Table 1. Basic chemical properties of soils at the paddy field, P. plantation without mulching and P. plantation with mulching sites.
Table 1. Basic chemical properties of soils at the paddy field, P. plantation without mulching and P. plantation with mulching sites.
Site TreatmentpHSOM
g kg−1
TN
g kg−1
NO3-N
mg kg−1
NH4+-N
mg kg−1
C/N
Ratio
PS6.54 ± 0.18 a43.26 ± 3.47 a2.59 ± 0.11 a6.18 ± 1.78 c8.67 ± 0.51 c9.69 ± 0.78 ab
PNM4.75 ± 0.11 b34.16 ± 0.54 c2.08 ± 0.04 b23.85 ± 1.56 b12.72 ± 1.26 b9.53 ± 0.15 b
PM4.00 ± 0.04 c36.58 ± 0.52 b2.08 ± 0.12 b43.32 ± 3.37 a20.22 ± 1.11 a10.20 ± 0.15 a
PS, paddy soil; PNM, Phyllostachys praecox plantation without mulching; PM, P. praecox plantation with mulching. SOM, soil organic matter; TN, soil total nitrogen; NH4+-N, ammonium N; NO3-N, nitrate N. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences among the treatments.
Table 2. The N mineralization for the paddy field, P. plantation without mulching and P. plantation with mulching sites.
Table 2. The N mineralization for the paddy field, P. plantation without mulching and P. plantation with mulching sites.
Treatment14 Days56 DaysN14 Nt−1N14 TN−1Nt TN−1
NH4+-NNO3-NN14NH4+-NNO3-NNt
mg kg−1mg kg−1mg kg−1mg kg−1mg kg−1mg kg−1%%%
PS117.03 ± 3.20 a21.00 ± 2.18 a138.04 ± 3.51 a163.30 ± 7.09 a27.76 ± 2.24 ab191.06 ± 9.10 a72.255.337.38
PNM43.79 ± 0.84 b20.30 ± 5.04 a64.09 ± 4.65 b93.73 ± 1.97 b35.06 ± 8.19 a128.79 ± 7.89 b49.763.086.19
PM38.90 ± 0.97 b13.61 ± 1.64 b52.51 ± 1.48 b72.44 ± 1.97 c23.04 ± 2.61 b95.48 ± 4.10 c55.002.524.59
N14, the cumulative nitrogen mineralization at the 14th day of incubation; Nt, the cumulative nitrogen mineralization at the end of the incubation period. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences among the treatments.
Table 3. Estimated parameters of four different models and their goodness-of-fit (R2) obtained from nonlinear regressions.
Table 3. Estimated parameters of four different models and their goodness-of-fit (R2) obtained from nonlinear regressions.
Model NameParameterUnitPSPNMPM
Effective cumulated temperature modelR2 0.9910.9960.998
k 28.013.4684.421
n 0.2780.5170.439
One-pool modelR2 0.9910.9960.989
N0mg kg−1184.4137.595.76
k0d−10.1000.0440.056
Two-pool modelR2 0.9991.0000.999
Na + Nrmg kg−1197.7255.3124.3
Namg kg−179.9761.0131.05
kad−10.2650.0950.213
Nrmg kg−1117.7194.293.22
krd−10.0490.0080.021
Special modelR2 0.9981.0000.999
Na0mg kg−1146.172.9450.44
ka0d−10.1480.0850.131
Crmg kg−1 d−10.8211.0060.808
PS, rice paddy soil; PNM, Phyllostachys praecox plantation without mulching; PM, P. praecox plantation with mulching.
Table 4. Pearson correlations between the mineral-N, parameters in the fitted models, and soil properties.
Table 4. Pearson correlations between the mineral-N, parameters in the fitted models, and soil properties.
Soil PropertiesNtknN0k0NakaNrkrNa0ka0Cr
SOM0.713 **0.757 **−0.764 **0.603 **0.765 **0.485 *0.658 ** 0.770 **0.685 **0.639 **
TN0.798 **0.863 **−0.843 **0.729 **0.858 **0.625 **0.658 ** 0.847 **0.810 **0.629 **−0.409 *
NH4+-N−0.722 **0.637 **0.463 *−0.798 **−0.539 **−0.753 **−0.144 −0.475 *−0.725 **
NO3-N−0.677 **−0.671 **0.541 **−0.755 **−0.597 **−0.680 **−0.288 −0.553 **−0.716 **
pH0.906 **0.946 **−0.819 **0.968 **0.884 **0.912 **0.446 * 0.823 **0.984 **
AAN0.744 **0.832 **−0.806 **0.714 **0.825 **0.624 **0.609 ** 0.810 **0.789 **0.578 **−0.407 *
ASN −0.467 * −0.436 *
AN 0.458 *0.568 ** 0.477 *−0.413 *
UHN0.440 *0.475 * 0.609 ** 0.617 ** 0.561 **
NHN0.449 *
THN0.718 **0.860 **−0.827 **0.747 **0.849 **0.653 **0.619 ** 0.831 **0.819 **0.587 **0.393
SOM, soil organic matter; TN, soil total nitrogen; NH4+-N, ammonium N; NO3-N, nitrate N; THN, hydrolyzable N; AN, ammonium N; AAN, amino acid N; ASN, amino sugar N; UHN, unknown hydrolyzable N; NHN, nonhydrolyzable N. The * and ** denote significance at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. The blanks in the form indicate there is no significant correlation between the two parameters.
Table 5. Significance tests of the relationship between soil properties and soil cumulative mineralized N based on the Mantel test.
Table 5. Significance tests of the relationship between soil properties and soil cumulative mineralized N based on the Mantel test.
rp
SOM0.52190.011
TN0.98390.001
NH4+-N0.97200.001
NO3-N0.83380.002
pH0.95490.001
AN−0.19610.889
AAN0.61230.004
ASN0.00550.392
UHN0.17370.140
NHN0.25060.061
SOM, soil organic matter; TN, soil total nitrogen; NH4+-N, ammonium N; NO3-N, nitrate N; AN, ammonium N; AAN, amino acid N; ASN, amino sugar N; UHN, unknown hydrolyzable N; NHN, nonhydrolyzable N.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qian, Z.; Sun, X.; Gao, J.; Zhuang, S. Effects of Bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) Cultivation on Soil Nitrogen Fractions and Mineralization. Forests 2021, 12, 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12081109

AMA Style

Qian Z, Sun X, Gao J, Zhuang S. Effects of Bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) Cultivation on Soil Nitrogen Fractions and Mineralization. Forests. 2021; 12(8):1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12081109

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qian, Zhuangzhuang, Xiao Sun, Jianshuang Gao, and Shunyao Zhuang. 2021. "Effects of Bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) Cultivation on Soil Nitrogen Fractions and Mineralization" Forests 12, no. 8: 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12081109

APA Style

Qian, Z., Sun, X., Gao, J., & Zhuang, S. (2021). Effects of Bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) Cultivation on Soil Nitrogen Fractions and Mineralization. Forests, 12(8), 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12081109

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop