Next Article in Journal
Municipal Forest Program Management in the United States of America: A Systematic Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Stability of C:N:P Stoichiometry in the Plant–Soil Continuum along Age Classes in Natural Pinus tabuliformis Carr. Forests of the Eastern Loess Plateau, China
Previous Article in Journal
Forest Bioeconomy from the Perspectives of Different EU Countries and Its Potential for Measuring Sustainability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Herbaceous Plant Roots on the Soil Shear Strength of the Collapsing Walls of Benggang in Southeast China
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Extracellular Enzyme Activity and Stoichiometry Reveal Nutrient Dynamics during Microbially-Mediated Plant Residue Transformation

Forests 2023, 14(1), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010034
by Chunhui Liu 1, Jingyi Ma 1,2, Tingting Qu 1, Zhijing Xue 1,*, Xiaoyun Li 1, Qin Chen 3, Ning Wang 1, Zhengchao Zhou 1 and Shaoshan An 4
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Forests 2023, 14(1), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010034
Submission received: 27 November 2022 / Revised: 19 December 2022 / Accepted: 21 December 2022 / Published: 24 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Disturbances on Forest Soil Biochemistry)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Minor revisions are required for the publication of this manuscript entitled “Extracellular enzyme activity and stoichiometry reveal nutrient dynamics during microbially-mediated plant residue transformation.”. This study is interesting but some minor corrections are required for publication.

1.     Use abbreviated form in abstract not short form.

2.     Please improve the introduction section. Include some recent information in introduction section related to the soil enzymes like FDA, alkaline phosphatase etc. Authors may consider these works: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02448-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05351-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02329-8

3.     Line 104 material and methods not Material and Methods. Please correct.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

My comments are about the keywords: please replace “soil microbial biomass carbon” with “soil microbial biomass” alone. Line 42: the differences between ex vivo and in vivo is unclear, please add more details. Line 96: replace “hypothesizes” with “hypothesis” and also, why limit microbial metabolism? Lines 104-110: this is part of the template, please delete it. Line 143: Did you use Walkley-Black or Springer-Klee method for SOC determination? Statistical analyses: How many samples did you collect? How many field and lab replicates did you perform the analysis on? Please report this information.

Some relevant references should be added as follow: 10.3390/f9120766, 10.1007/s11104-022-05676-y, 10.3390/f7080181, 10.1007/s10533-009-9404-y.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop