Next Article in Journal
Differences in Public Perceptions of Recovery in Different Urban Forests Based on Birdsong
Previous Article in Journal
Unique Geoclimatic Factors and Topography-Shaped Pollen Flow of Pinus yunnanensis var. tenuifolia Wild Populations in the Dry–Hot River Basin in China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phenological Response of an Evergreen Broadleaf Tree, Quercus acuta, to Meteorological Variability: Evaluation of the Performance of Time Series Models

Ecological Observation Team, National Institute of Ecology, Seocheon 33657, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2024, 15(12), 2216; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122216
Submission received: 29 October 2024 / Revised: 12 December 2024 / Accepted: 13 December 2024 / Published: 16 December 2024

Abstract

:
Phenological events are key indicators for the assessment of climate change impacts on ecosystems. Most previous studies have focused on identifying the timing of phenological events, such as flowering, leaf-out, leaf-fall, etc. In this study, we explored the characteristics of the green chromatic coordinate (GCC) values of the evergreen broadleaf tree (Quercus acuta Thunb.), which is a widely used index that serves as a proxy for the seasonal and physiological responses of trees. Additionally, we estimated their relationship with meteorological variables using time series models, including time series decomposition and a seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average with exogenous regressors (SARIMAX). Our results showed that the GCC values and the meteorological variables, which were collected at daily intervals, exhibited a strong autocorrelation and seasonality. This suggests that time series analysis methods are more suitable than ordinary least squares (OLS) regression methods for the fulfillment of statistical assumptions. The time series analysis results highlighted a strong association between precipitation and GCC variation in evergreen broadleaf trees, particularly during the dry season. These results improve our understanding of the response of plant phenology to climate change.

1. Introduction

The importance of plant phenological events in the context of climate change is undeniable [1], particularly in regions with distinct seasonality, as phenological mismatches can have severe consequences for agriculture and ecosystems [2]. It is well known that the timing of biological events is strongly controlled by meteorological variations. A previous study reported that the flowering timing of 90% of 243 studied plants was significantly related to temperature [3], and other researchers also argued that temperature is one of the most important factors for plant phenology [4,5]. However, few studies have assessed the importance of multiple meteorological factors such as temperature, precipitation, and solar radiation on plant phenological responses.
Traditional plant phenologic observations, including flowering, leaf-out, leaf-falling, etc., have been recorded by repeated visual observations. Capturing the exact date of key events is relatively labor-intensive and costly. Recently, repeated photography taken with ground-based cameras has been used to document changes in phenological variation. Specifically, the calculated RGB (red, green, and blue) bands can be manipulated in numerous ways to detect patterns and classify objects. RGB images can be captured inexpensively and effectively estimate percent plant cover and biomass [6], and the phenocams can serve as a bridge between satellite remote sensing and field observation methods in plant phenology research [7,8]. The interpretation of time series RGB bands can be improved by incorporating meteorological data collected alongside them [9], and time series statistical models can help identify phenological triggers hidden within these datasets.
Time series data consists of sequential observations taken at equally spaced intervals. Time series analysis is based on the fundamental assumption that past patterns will continue to repeat in the future [10]. The most commonly used method for time series analysis is an autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA). This time series model is frequently applied in various fields such as meteorology, epidemiology, limnology, etc. [11,12,13,14], but it is seldom applied in the terrestrial ecological field [15]. In particular, ground-based phenology datasets have rarely been analyzed with time series statistical methods.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the applicability of ground-based digital photography and time series analysis as tools for estimating relationships between tree phenological responses and meteorological factors. The first specific objective is to demonstrate the utility of time series models for ground-based phenocam datasets. The second specific objective is to identify which meteorological variables, namely temperature, precipitation, and solar radiation, have an influence on the GCC variability of evergreen broad-leaved forests.

2. Data and Methods

2.1. Study Site and Data Collection

Mt. Sangwang is part of Wando-gun, Jeolla province (34.3° N, 126.6° E) (Figure 1). Mt. Sangwang is located southeast of the Korean Peninsula and belongs to the humid subtropical climate zone (Cfa) according to the Köppen climate classification. Our study site supports one of the largest evergreen broadleaf forests in the Korean Peninsula. Dominant tree species are Quercus acuta Thunb., Castanopsis sieboldii (Makino) Hatus., and Quercus glauca Thunb. Its annual average temperature is 13.6°C and the annual average precipitation was nearly 1310 mm over the study period. It has more than 60% of its precipitation during the summer (monsoon season), and winter and spring suffer from drought (Figure 2). Our site is located 240 m above sea level.
The phenocam used in this study was positioned to capture the southwest-facing canopy of a Quercus acuta forest from the ecological research tower of the National Institute of Forest Science (34°21′32.6″ N, 126°40′22.4″ E). The camera, a Nikon D5600 DSLR, was connected to a modem for remote data transmission, and a plastic housing was used to protect the camera and other electronic equipment from harsh environmental conditions. To obtain optimal daily green chromatic coordinate (GCC) values for phenological analysis, we selected one image per day throughout the study period from September 2017 to August 2023. Typically, to avoid shadows and minimize light scatter, this was taken between 12:00 and 13:00. Regions of interest (ROI) were defined for the evergreen broadleaf tree, Q. acuta, as described by [16,17]. The distance from the camera to the ROI is 8 m. The vegetation index of the GCC was calculated by extracting the relative brightness of the red, green, and blue color channels (RGB), a process which is widely used to identify phenological phase changes [18,19].
G C C = D N G D N R + D N G + D N B
where DN is the digital number and R, G, and B denote the red, green, and blue channels. The GCC value acts as a proxy for understanding tree physiological processes, including chlorophyll content, photosynthetic activity, and carbon assimilation. These processes were performed using the R package ‘phenopix’ [20].
The daily meteorological data was provided by the weather station of the Korea Meteorological Administration [21]. Meteorological factors included mean temperature (Tmean), maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), range temperature (Trange), mean humidity (Hmean), maximum humidity (Hmax), minimum humidity (Hmin), precipitation (precip), and solar radiation (radiation) (Table 1). The meteorological observation station was located 4.4 km away from the phenocam observation site. (Figure 1).

2.2. Statistical Analysis

To estimate the relative importance of meteorological variables on the greenness of evergreen broad-leaved forests, we applied several time series analysis methods. Before statistical analysis, the gap-filling process was carried out based on the spline interpolation method (cubic spline) due to missing 23% of the GCC values [22]. We chose the cubic spline interpolation method because this method is generally more robust for unequally spaced points compared to many other interpolation methods [23]. Missing values are primarily caused by mechanical failures in data collection or storage. We also standardized all the collected variables (Z-Score normalization) to compare these variables on the same scale. To examine the characteristics of the data, the Ljung–Box test was used to assess autocorrelation, and the ADF test was conducted to evaluate stationarity in our datasets [24].
As time series data have many underlying patterns, it is necessary to split the time series data into trend, season, and residual components using seasonal-trend decomposition using LOESS (STL) [25]. After decomposing the time series data, we extracted the trend component to compare the distance between the GCC index and meteorological variables using the dynamic time warping (DTW) method [26]. By focusing on the underlying trends rather than short-term fluctuations or noise, the trend component distance helps explore how two different time series evolve together over a long-term period [27].
The basic time series models, ARIMA models, can be divided into autoregressive (AR) and moving average (MA) terms, which are defined as ARIMA (p, d, q), where p and q are the orders of AR and MA models, respectively, and d represents the degree of series integration (differencing) [28,29]. The SARIMA model can analyze seasonal lags by incorporating seasonal parameters (P, D, Q)S. Additionally, the SARIMAX model can incorporate exogenous variables to reflect the structural changes of the analyzed process. Its general equation can be defined as
Y t = c + φ 1 Y t 1 + + φ p Y t p + θ 1 ϵ t 1 + + θ q ϵ t q + φ a Y t s Y t s m + β X t + ε ( t )
where Y ( t ) is the value of the time series at time t , c is the constant term, φ 1 to φ p represent the autoregressive parameters, θ 1 to θ q represent the moving average parameters, β X t represents the exogenous variables at time t and β is a vector of coefficients for those variables, ε ( t ) is the error term at time t , s is the seasonal period, and m is the number of seasonal periods.
Our SARIMAX model incorporates meteorological factors as exogenous variables to estimate the effects of environmental variables on the GCC variations. Owing to computation expenses and to minimize the effects of outliers, the weekly mean time series values were used for the SARIMAX model. In this model, the periodicity parameter S was set to 52 weeks (1 year). The procedure for defining the structure of SARIMAX was as follows: (1) Multicollinearity was investigated before entering the exogenous variables into the SARIMAX model. (2) An augmented Dickey–Fuller test (ADF) was performed to verify the stationary and the periodical terms were estimated using the autocorrelation function (ACF) and partial ACF (PACF) diagrams of GCC data. (3) The parameters p, P, q, and Q range from 0 to 4, and the parameters d and D range from 0 to 1 and were constructed to fit the time series of the GCC, and then the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) value was selected considering the optimal SARIMAX model. (4) Forecast accuracy was evaluated using the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percent error (MAPE). We considered the lower values of these statistics to be better for forecasting accuracy. (5) The selected optimal model was diagnosed with the Ljung–Box test for the independence of residuals, and the Jarque–Bera test for the normal distribution of residuals. All time series analyses were performed using the “statsmodels” package in Python 3.6.3. [30].

3. Results

3.1. Time Series Data Decomposition

The summary statistics for the daily GCC values and meteorological factors, as well as the results of the Ljung–Box test and the ADF test, are described in Table 1. The mean GCC value was 0.38 ± 0.02 and was highly autocorrelated over time (p < 0.001) according to the results of the Ljung–Box test. The Ljung–Box test also showed significant autocorrelation in all meteorological factors. The ADF test showed that the temperature variables (Tmean, Tmax, Tmin) were statistically non-stationary.
To explore the time series data in more detail, the GCC time series was decomposed into three components: trend, seasonal, and residual (Figure 3). The trend component had the lowest value in early 2022 and gradually increased. The seasonal component showed a distinct seasonal periodicity of the GCC, typically peaking annually in summer.
This study calculated paired dynamic time warping (DTW) distances to compare the similarity of time series datasets (Figure 4). Although the observed GCC time series had higher similarities with temperature variables, the trend component, with seasonal and random variations removed to reveal the underlying long-term pattern, showed greater similarity to humidity and precipitation variables than temperature (Figure A1).

3.2. SARIMAX

To estimate the relationship between weekly GCC values and meteorological factors, the SARIMAX time series model was developed. The time series GCC data was tested for stationary by an augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) test. The test statistics confirmed the stationary after the first difference (−10.86, p < 0.001). The best-fitted SARIMAX model developed for the GCC was selected: SARIMA (0, 1, 1) (0, 1, 1)52 with four meteorological exogenous variables (AIC = −65.8, BIC = −42.2) (Table 2).
Our SARIMAX model includes the moving average term (lag 1), especially the seasonal moving average term (52-week moving average), which significantly accounted for seasonal variations of the GCC time series. To identify the importance of meteorological factors, we chose Tmax, Hmax, solar radiation, and precipitation as the optimal exogenous variables considering multicollinearity. Among the meteorological variables, Tmax had the highest positive feature importance, with a weight coefficient of 0.095, but it also had a larger standard error (SE) compared to other exogenous variables. Precipitation was the next important exogenous factor with a weight coefficient of 0.062 and a significant positive confidence interval. However, solar radiation and Hmax were not relevant to the prediction of the GCC within a 95% confidence interval.
Figure 5 displays observed and predicted values for visualization of the performance of our SARIMAX (0, 1, 1)(0, 1, 1)52 model. This model was evaluated based on its RMSE and MAPE. When comparing the model performance with and without exogenous factors, the model with exogenous factors shows a slightly better fit to the observed data. The SARIMAX model with exogenous factor has the RMSE value of 0.246, suggesting that the model’s predictions are 0.246 units away from the actual values on average. Model performance was validated using an independent test dataset to ensure robustness. The plot demonstrates that the model’s predicted values closely align with the observed values, providing evidence of its accuracy.
To interpret the results of our model for the GCC, the diagnostic residual plots for the model were generated (Figure A2). Our model showed randomly scattered residuals, indicating that this model correctly captured the underlying patterns in the data. In addition, the normality of the residuals of our model was revealed by a histogram and a Q-Q plot. Finally, the correlogram of our model’s residuals shows no significant correlation at any lag, indicating the removal of any autocorrelation from the data. The developed SARIMAX model was tested for independence and normal distribution of the residuals using the Ljung–Box test (p = 0.95) and the Jarque–Bera test (p = 0.07), which showed the adequacy of the fit of the estimated model.

4. Discussion

This study explored the effects of meteorological factors on the GCC value of Q. acuta using time series analysis. Daily or weekly changes in the GCC and meteorological variables are recorded as a sequence of data points over an interval time, meaning that past values can influence future ones due to trends, seasonality, or cyclical patterns in the data [27]. These temporal dependencies should be considered in these time series datasets for the validity of the model [31]. Other researchers have emphasized the importance of time series analysis in the ecological field [15]. However, these methods are rarely applied to terrestrial ecology, particularly to ground-based phenocam datasets.
Most of the GCC value was focused on identifying the seasonal key events, such as the start of season (SOS), end of season (EOS), and peak of season (POS). The timing of these events is a vital mechanism for maintaining species coexistence, since plants are the base of the food chain [32]. Furthermore, it can determine how ecosystems respond to the impact of climate change [33], but it takes at least 10 or 20 years to identify the effect of climate on the tree’s phenological response because these seasonal patterns occur once a year. Additionally, the change of the GCC for the evergreen tree is vague, so detecting seasonal key events is more difficult in the evergreen tree compared to the deciduous tree.
To overcome these weaknesses, we applied a time series statistical method to identify the effect of meteorological factors on GCC variations of the evergreen tree. Time series statistical methods, such as ARIMA, SARIMA, SARIMAX, etc., are commonly applied to analyze or predict meteorological variables due to their data properties [34]. The satellite remote sensing dataset is also frequently explored by time series methods. For example, the ARIMA model was conducted to predict the vegetation health index and to estimate the relation with meteorological variables [35], and to evaluate the danger of forest fires for past and future climatic periods [36]. However, time series methods have not been applied to ground-based phenocam data. The Ljung–Box test and the ACF plots showed strong autocorrelation in the GCC index and meteorological factors, indicating that ordinary least squares (OLS) regression is not suitable, as it could result in unreliable statistical inferences and spurious relationships. However, numerous previous phenocam studies have conducted data analyses using ordinary least squares regression methods [37,38,39]. Our SARIMAX model demonstrated excellent predictions of GCC values and good diagnostic results using phenology data from September 2017 to August 2023. This study demonstrates that time series statistical methods are a valuable approach for analyzing ground-based phenocam data.
When comparing the long-term trends of GCC values with meteorological variables, the time series trends of humidity and precipitation showed greater similarity to GCC variations than those of temperature and solar radiation. Specifically, precipitation at our study site from October 2021 to February 2022 was only 55 mm, just 24% of the average rainfall. During the same period, the GCC values of Q. acuta were also significantly low. Our SARIMAX model also confirmed the relevance of precipitation for the GCC fluctuation. Precipitation was the only statistically significant exogenous variable, suggesting that variability in precipitation may have a greater impact on the phenological variability of Q. acuta than temperature. A previous study also suggested that variation of precipitation is a critical driver in phenological shifts in drylands [40]. Prolonged drought can affect groundwater availability, potentially triggering an unavoidable physiological response in trees or even leading to tree mortality [41]. The results of satellite-derived monitoring also show that the interannual variation in annual rainfall distribution influenced the length of the growing season [42]. Deep soil water can offer a relatively stable water source for trees, but the shallow soil causes water to drain quickly after rainfall at our site [43]. Consequently, prolonged droughts lasting several months can put significant stress on the trees. In particular, evergreen broad-leaved trees may be more sensitive to drought than deciduous broad-leaved trees during winter and early spring, as they continue to lose water through transpiration via their stomata [44,45], even in the drought season on the Korean Peninsula.
While our study provided statistical evidence of the impact of drought on the GCC value of Q. acuta, a limitation is that it did not establish a causal relationship between precipitation and GCC variation. To better understand the effects of meteorological variables on the phenological responses of trees, it is crucial to measure physiological indicators such as sap flow, photosynthetic rate, and osmotic potential. Our study site is situated at the boundary between the temperate and warm–temperate climate zones, where evergreen broad-leaved trees must adapt to low temperatures and drought during the winter season. At our site, Q. acuta may prioritize accumulating soluble carbohydrates, amino acids, and water-soluble proteins in their cells to regulate osmosis over enhancing photosynthesis. Investigating the combined effects of low temperatures and drought could be an important research topic. Additionally, monitoring soil moisture contents, which is directly influenced by precipitation, is crucial for estimating causal relationships.

5. Conclusions

In order to clarify the influence of meteorological variables on the phenological variation in the evergreen broad-leaved forests, we used ground-based digital photographic images and analyzed the collected data by means of time series methods. The results showed strong autocorrelation and seasonality in the GCC value collected at daily intervals. This means that unreliable statistical inferences and spurious relationships can be made using the ordinary least squares (OLS) regression method. It is crucial to carefully examine the characteristics of the data and to use appropriate statistical models to satisfy basic statistical assumptions. We recommend using time series analysis on phenocam data sets that are highly autocorrelated and seasonal. Our time series analysis highlighted the influence of dry season precipitation on the GCC variation of evergreen broad-leaved trees on the Korean Peninsula. Our results help to understand how plant phenology responds to climate change and improve the accuracy of phenological modeling.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.P. and H.L.; methodology, J.P.; software, M.H. and J.P.; validation, J.P. and M.H.; formal analysis, J.P.; investigation, J.P.; resources, M.H.; data curation, J.P. and M.H.; writing—original draft preparation, J.P. and M.H.; writing—review and editing, J.P.; visualization, J.P.; supervision, J.P. and H.L.; project administration, J.P. and H.L.; funding acquisition, J.P. and H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institute of Ecology (grant no. No. NIE-B-2024-02).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. The variability of the trends in the GCC and nine meteorological factors. The trend components have been estimated after decomposing the individual time series data using the seasonal-trend decomposition with LOESS (STL).
Figure A1. The variability of the trends in the GCC and nine meteorological factors. The trend components have been estimated after decomposing the individual time series data using the seasonal-trend decomposition with LOESS (STL).
Forests 15 02216 g0a1
Figure A2. The diagnostic plot for the residuals of our model. The residuals are the difference between the predictions of the model one step ahead and the actual values of the time series. (a) The standardized residual. (b) Residual distribution, the orange line (KDE) shows a smoothed version of this histogram and the green line shows a normal distribution. (c) The Q-Q plot compares the distribution of the residuals with the normal distribution. (d) The correlogram plot is the autocorrelation function of the residuals. A total of 95% of the correlations should be insignificant for lags greater than zero (within the blue shading).
Figure A2. The diagnostic plot for the residuals of our model. The residuals are the difference between the predictions of the model one step ahead and the actual values of the time series. (a) The standardized residual. (b) Residual distribution, the orange line (KDE) shows a smoothed version of this histogram and the green line shows a normal distribution. (c) The Q-Q plot compares the distribution of the residuals with the normal distribution. (d) The correlogram plot is the autocorrelation function of the residuals. A total of 95% of the correlations should be insignificant for lags greater than zero (within the blue shading).
Forests 15 02216 g0a2

References

  1. Morisette, J.T.; Richardson, A.D.; Knapp, A.K.; Fisher, J.I.; Graham, E.A.; Abatzoglou, J.; Wilson, B.E.; Breshears, D.D.; Henebry, G.M.; Hanes, J.M.; et al. Tracking the rhythm of the seasons in the face of global change: Phenological research in the 21st century. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Beard, K.H.; Kelsey, K.C.; Leffler, A.J.; Welker, J.M. The Missing Angle: Ecosystem Consequences of Phenological Mismatch. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2019, 34, 885–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fitter, A.H.; Fitter, R.S.R.; Harris, I.T.B.; Williamson, M.H. Relationships between first flowering date and temperature in the flora of a locality in central England. Funct. Ecol. 1995, 1, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sparks, T.H.; Jeffree, E.P.; Jeffree, C.E. An examination of the relationship between flowering times and temperature at the national scale using long-term phenological records from the UK. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2000, 44, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Menzel, A.; Sparks, T.H.; Estrella, N.; Koch, E.; Aasa, A.; Ahas, R.; Alm-Kübler, K.; Bissolli, P.; Braslavská, O.G.; Briede, A.; et al. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob. Change Biol. 2006, 12, 969–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Luscier, J.D.; Thompson, W.L.; Wilson, J.M.; Gorham, B.E.; Dragut, L.D. Using digital photographs and object-based image analysis to estimate percent ground cover in vegetation plots. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2006, 4, 408–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Browning, D.; Karl, J.; Morin, D.; Richardson, A.; Tweedie, C. Phenocams Bridge the Gap between Field and Satellite Observations in an Arid Grassland Ecosystem. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Klosterman, S.T.; Hufkens, K.; Gray, J.M.; Melaas, E.; Sonnentag, O.; Lavine, I.; Mitchell, L.; Norman, R.; Friedl, M.A.; Richardson, A.D. Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery. Biogeosciences 2014, 11, 4305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Crimmins, M.A.; Crimmins, T.M. Monitoring Plant Phenology Using Digital Repeat Photography. Environ. Manag. 2008, 41, 949–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Raman, R.K.; Mohanty, S.K.; Bhatta, K.S.; Karna, S.K.; Sahoo, A.K.; Mohanty, B.P.; Das, B.K. Time series forecasting model for fisheries in Chilika lagoon (a Ramsar site, 1981), Odisha, India: A case study. Wetlands Ecol. Manag. 2018, 26, 677–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bai, L.; Lu, K.; Dong, Y.; Wang, X.; Gong, Y.; Xia, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, L.; Yan, S.; Tang, Z.; et al. Predicting monthly hospital outpatient visits based on meteorological environmental factors using the ARIMA model. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. He, J.; Wei, X.; Yin, W.; Wang, Y.; Qian, Q.; Sun, H.; Xu, Y.; Magalhaes, R.J.S.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, W. Forecasting Scrub Typhus Cases in Eight High-Risk Counties in China: Evaluation of Time-Series Model Performance. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 9, 783864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mulla, S.; Pande, C.B.; Singh, S.K. Times Series Forecasting of Monthly Rainfall using Seasonal Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average with EXogenous Variables (SARIMAX) Model. Water Resour. Manag. 2024, 38, 1825–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guo, Y.; Lai, X.; Gan, M. Cyanobacterial biomass prediction in a shallow lake using the time series SARIMAX models. Ecol. Inf. 2023, 78, 102292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Boero, F.; Kraberg, A.C.; Krause, G.; Wiltshire, K.H. Time is an affliction: Why ecology cannot be as predictive as physics and why it needs time series. J. Sea Res. 2015, 101, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Richardson, A.D.; Braswell, B.H.; Hollinger, D.Y.; Jenkins, J.P.; Ollinger, S.V. Near-surface remote sensing of spatial and temporal variation in canopy phenology. Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19, 1417–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Alberton, B.; Almeida, J.; Helm, R.; Torres, R.D.S.; Menzel, A.; Morellato, L.P.C. Using phenological cameras to track the green up in a cerrado savanna and its on-the-ground validation. Ecol. Inf. 2014, 19, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Richardson, A.D.; Jenkins, J.P.; Braswell, B.H.; Hollinger, D.Y.; Ollinger, S.V.; Smith, M.L. Use of digital webcam images to track spring green-up in a deciduous broadleaf forest. Oecologia 2007, 152, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Toomey, M.; Friedl, M.A.; Frolking, S.; Hufkens, K.; Klosterman, S.; Sonnentag, O.; Baldocchi, D.D.; Bernacchi, C.J.; Biraud, S.C.; Bohrer, G.; et al. Greenness indices from digital cameras predict the timing and seasonal dynamics of canopy-scale photosynthesis. Ecol. Appl. 2015, 25, 99–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Filippa, G.; Cremonese, E.; Migliavacca, M.; Galvagno, M.; Forkel, M.; Wingate, L.; Tomelleri, E.; di Cella, U.M.; Richardson, A.D. Phenopix: AR package for image-based vegetation phenology. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2016, 220, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA). Available online: https://www.weather.go.kr (accessed on 2 August 2024).
  22. De Boor, C. A Practical Guide to Splines, revised ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kvasov, B.I. Methods of Shape-Preserving Spline Approximation; World Scientific: Singapore, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chatfield, C.; Xing, H. The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction with, R; Chapman and hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cleveland, R.B.; Cleveland, W.S.; McRae, J.E.; Terpenning, I. STL: A seasonal-trend decomposition. J. Off. Stat. 1990, 6, 3–73. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bankó, Z.; Abonyi, J. Correlation based dynamic time warping of multivariate time series. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 17, 12814–12823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brockwell, P.J.; Davis, R.A. (Eds.) Introduction to Time Series and Forecasting; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yin, R. Forecasting short-term timber prices with univariate ARIMA models. South. J. Appl. For. 1999, 23, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Banaś, J.; Utnik-Banaś, K. Evaluating a seasonal autoregressive moving average model with an exogenous variable for short-term timber price forecasting. For. Policy Econ. 2021, 131, 102564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Seabold, S.; Perktold, J. Statsmodels: Econometric and Statistical Modeling with Python. SciPy 2010, 7, 92–96. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mo, H.H.; Cho, K.; Shin, K.I. A Review of Time Series Analysis for Environmental and Ecological Data. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 2016, 34, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jorge, C.; Silva, J.M.N.; Boavida-Portugal, J.; Soares, C.; Cerasoli, S. Using Digital Photography to Track Understory Phenology in Mediterranean Cork Oak Woodlands. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kramer, K.; Leinonen, I.; Loustau, D. The importance of phenology for the evaluation of impact of climate change on growth of boreal, temperate and Mediterranean forests ecosystems: An overview. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2000, 44, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kaur, J.; Parmar, K.S.; Singh, S. Autoregressive models in environmental forecasting time series: A theoretical and application review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 19617–19641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vilanova, R.S.; Delgado, R.C.; da Silva Abel, E.L.; Teodoro, P.E.; Silva Junior, C.A.; Wanderley, H.S.; Capristo-Silva, G.F. Past and future assessment of vegetation activity for the state of Amazonas-Brazil. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2020, 17, 100278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jesus, C.S.L.D.; Delgado, R.C.; Wanderley, H.S.; Teodoro, P.E.; Pereira, M.G.; Lima, M.; Silva Junior, C.A.D. Fire risk associated with landscape changes, climatic events and remote sensing in the Atlantic Forest using ARIMA model. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2022, 26, 100761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yu, L.; Liu, T.; Bu, K.; Yan, F.; Yang, J.; Chang, L.; Zhang, S. Monitoring the long term vegetation phenology change in Northeast China from 1982 to 2015. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Xie, Y.; Civco, D.L.; Silander, J.A. Species-specific spring and autumn leaf phenology captured by time-lapse digital cameras. Ecosphere 2018, 9, e02089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, X.; Zhang, Y. The impact of vegetation phenology changes on the relationship between climate and net primary productivity in Yunnan, China, under global warming. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1248482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Currier, C.M.; Sala, O.E. Precipitation versus temperature as phenology controls in drylands. Ecology 2022, 103, e3793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Piayda, A.; Dubbert, M.; Rebmann, C.; Kolle, O.; e Silva, F.C.; Correia, A.; Pereira, J.S.; Werner, C.; Cuntz, M. Drought impact on carbon and water cycling in a Mediterranean Quercus suber L. woodland during the extreme drought event in 2012. Biogeosciences 2014, 11, 7159–7178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Medeiros, R.; Andrade, J.; Ramos, D.; Moura, M.; Pérez-Marin, A.M.; dos Santos, C.A.; da Silva, B.B.; Cunha, J. Remote Sensing Phenology of the Brazilian Caatinga and Its Environmental Drivers. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Korean Soil Information System (KSIS). Available online: https://soil.rda.go.kr/ (accessed on 20 September 2024).
  44. Chapin, F.S., III; Matson, P.A.; Vitousek, P.M. Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  45. De Souza, B.C.; Carvalho, E.C.D.; Oliveira, R.S.; de Araujo, F.S.; de Lima, A.L.A.; Rodal, M.J.N. Drought response strategies of deciduous and evergreen woody species in a seasonally dry neotropical forest. Oecologia 2020, 194, 221–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Locations of tree phenological monitoring site using phenocam and weather station on Mt. Sangwang. Right picture is the phenocam image with regions of interest (ROI: red polygon).
Figure 1. Locations of tree phenological monitoring site using phenocam and weather station on Mt. Sangwang. Right picture is the phenocam image with regions of interest (ROI: red polygon).
Forests 15 02216 g001
Figure 2. Temperature and precipitation over the study period. The vertical bar is the total monthly precipitation and each point is the mean monthly temperature. The vertical grey lines are the standard deviation of the temperature.
Figure 2. Temperature and precipitation over the study period. The vertical bar is the total monthly precipitation and each point is the mean monthly temperature. The vertical grey lines are the standard deviation of the temperature.
Forests 15 02216 g002
Figure 3. Decomposition of GCC time series value. (A) presents the observed time series of GCC. (BD) depict the decomposed components: the trend component, seasonal component, and residual, respectively.
Figure 3. Decomposition of GCC time series value. (A) presents the observed time series of GCC. (BD) depict the decomposed components: the trend component, seasonal component, and residual, respectively.
Forests 15 02216 g003
Figure 4. Heat map of the paired dynamic time warping (DTW) distance matrix for the observed GCC time series (A) and the trend component of the GCC (B). A lower DTW distance between the two time series variables indicates a greater similarity in their temporal changes.
Figure 4. Heat map of the paired dynamic time warping (DTW) distance matrix for the observed GCC time series (A) and the trend component of the GCC (B). A lower DTW distance between the two time series variables indicates a greater similarity in their temporal changes.
Forests 15 02216 g004
Figure 5. Observed data and predicted model for the GCC from September 2017 to August 2023 using SARIMAX model with exogenous factors. The grey shade area represents the 95% confidence interval.
Figure 5. Observed data and predicted model for the GCC from September 2017 to August 2023 using SARIMAX model with exogenous factors. The grey shade area represents the 95% confidence interval.
Forests 15 02216 g005
Table 1. Summary statistics of the daily observed variables during the sampling period from September 2017 to August 2023.
Table 1. Summary statistics of the daily observed variables during the sampling period from September 2017 to August 2023.
Variables (Unit)MeanStdMinMaxLjung–Box TestADF Test
Statisticsp-ValueStatisticsp-Value
GCC0.380.0220.330.4647,0400.000−3.800.003
Tmean (°C)13.698.38−8.0828.548,0940.000−2.050.265
Tmax (°C)16.758.08−5.4732.646,2270.000−2.510.113
Tmin (°C)11.058.82−11.426.448,8730.000−2.540.105
Trange (°C)5.701.960.3614.054920.000−4.860.000
Hmean (%)75.414.328.910010,5330.000−3.830.003
Hmax (%)92.09.863810042780.000−4.730.000
Hmin (%)57.118.21310010,9750.000−3.600.006
Precipitation (mm)3.5913.30165.51240.001−38.910.000
Solar radiation (MJ/m2)14.677.280.9130.673100.000−4.490.000
Table 2. The best fitted SARIMAX (0, 1, 1) (0, 1, 1)52 model parameter’s estimate and their significance for the GCC on Mt. Sangwang.
Table 2. The best fitted SARIMAX (0, 1, 1) (0, 1, 1)52 model parameter’s estimate and their significance for the GCC on Mt. Sangwang.
Model ParameterEstimateSEProb > |Z|Confidence Interval
0.0250.975
Tmax0.0950.0560.091−0.0150.205
Hmax0.0390.0240.096−0.0070.086
Solar radiation0.0410.0270.135−0.0130.094
Precipitation0.0620.0240.0090.0150.108
Moving average, lag 1−0.1600.0520.002−0.262−0.058
Seasonal moving average, seasonal lag 1−0.5800.0930.000−0.763−0.397
Model   variance   ( σ 2 ) 0.0370.0040.0000.0300.044
AIC = −65.8, BIC = −42.2, Ljung–Box (Prob (Q) = 0.95), Jarque–Bera (Prob (JB) = 0.07)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, J.; Hong, M.; Lee, H. Phenological Response of an Evergreen Broadleaf Tree, Quercus acuta, to Meteorological Variability: Evaluation of the Performance of Time Series Models. Forests 2024, 15, 2216. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122216

AMA Style

Park J, Hong M, Lee H. Phenological Response of an Evergreen Broadleaf Tree, Quercus acuta, to Meteorological Variability: Evaluation of the Performance of Time Series Models. Forests. 2024; 15(12):2216. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122216

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Jeongsoo, Minki Hong, and Hyohyemi Lee. 2024. "Phenological Response of an Evergreen Broadleaf Tree, Quercus acuta, to Meteorological Variability: Evaluation of the Performance of Time Series Models" Forests 15, no. 12: 2216. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122216

APA Style

Park, J., Hong, M., & Lee, H. (2024). Phenological Response of an Evergreen Broadleaf Tree, Quercus acuta, to Meteorological Variability: Evaluation of the Performance of Time Series Models. Forests, 15(12), 2216. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122216

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop