Next Article in Journal
Drivers of Plant Invasion in Stream Restoration
Next Article in Special Issue
The Gradient Variation of Location Distribution, Cross-Section Area, and Mechanical Properties of Moso Bamboo Vascular Bundles along the Radial Direction
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Canopy Nitrogen Addition and Understory Vegetation Removal on Nitrogen Transformations in a Subtropical Forest
Previous Article in Special Issue
Highly Mechanical Strength, Flexible and Stretchable Wood-Based Elastomers without Chemical Cross-Linking
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Deterioration Degree of Archaeological Wood from Luoyang Canal No. 1 Ancient Ship

1
Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2
College of Furnishing and Industrial Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Str. Longpan No.159, Nanjing 210037, China
3
Advanced Analysis and Testing Center, Nanjing Forestry University, Str. Longpan No.159, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2024, 15(6), 963; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15060963
Submission received: 30 April 2024 / Revised: 18 May 2024 / Accepted: 29 May 2024 / Published: 31 May 2024

Abstract

:
This study provides a detailed investigation of archaeological wood samples from the Luoyang Canal No. 1 site, focusing on wood species identification, physical properties, mechanical property analyses, and morphological examination. The identified wood species, belonging to the Ulmus genus, exhibited a 43% decline in compressive strength in waterlogged environments. Further, the wood exhibited increased moisture content, higher porosity, reduced basic density, and elevated shrinkage rates, indicating a mild level of degradation. X-ray diffraction was employed for the observation of cellulose structure, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) demonstrated significant removal of cellulose and hemicellulose components. These findings emphasize the importance of understanding wood degradation mechanisms to evaluate structural integrity and durability in guiding the development of effective preservation strategies for archaeological wood artifacts. Continued research and conservation are crucial to deepen our knowledge of wood deterioration processes and enhance the implementation of preservation techniques.

1. Introduction

Wood is an important natural material and was one of the earliest substances utilized by humans [1,2,3]. Numerous wooden objects discovered during archaeological excavations embody the cultural legacy of past generations, possessing substantial scientific, historical, and artistic importance [4]. Burial environments are usually wet or aquatic, which results in all of the pores of wood remains, including vessels, fibers, and micro capillaries, being entirely filled with water [5,6]. These archaeological woods can be extremely fragile due to various deteriorating factors, such as microbial attacks [7,8,9,10,11], temperature, humidity [7,9], oxygen, and chemical pollutants [7,11]. Hence, their preservation is imperative for maintaining the integrity of wooden artifacts [12,13]. Since the mode of wood degradation exhibits significant variability across different archaeological locations [14,15], a comprehensive understanding of the extent of deterioration in archaeological wood is essential for implementing scientific, accurate, and rigorous restoration and preservation plans [16].
Luoyang No. 1 is a wooden merchant ship that was discovered in September 2013 at the bottom of an ancient canal. Carbon-14 analyses of excavated porcelain, iron products, wooden artefacts, and soil confirmed that the shipwreck occurred during the early Qing Dynasty (1644–1902). The ship was uncovered after seven months of excavation and was transferred to the Luoyang Museum for further conservation [17].
This study focuses on the archaeological wood of the Luoyang Canal No. 1 ancient ship, beginning with wood species identification. Using recent healthy wood of identical species as a control group, the assessment of deterioration involved the evaluation of physical characteristics such as maximum moisture content, fundamental density, porosity, and rate of shrinkage. Furthermore, mechanical properties evaluation and chemical characterization techniques were utilized to assess wood degradation. The use of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) allowed for the observation of wood fiber structure and analysis of degradation across its various components. The findings of this research are expected to offer valuable insights for the restoration and conservation of the Luoyang Canal No. 1 ancient ship, while also providing a benchmark for evaluating the extent of degradation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The wood samples gathered from the archaeological site of the Luoyang Canal No. 1 ancient ship were procured and relocated to the museum for further analysis. The samples consisted of more than 20 pieces of wood, varying in length from 12 to 26 cm, characterized by their lightweight, frayed edges, and dry surfaces coated with sediment. Subsequent examination revealed that these specimens were classified as hardwood, exhibiting ring-porous characteristics. According to the excavation staff, the wooden specimens were probably part of the keel of the ancient ship discovered at the Luoyang Canal site. The wood underwent a preservation procedure at the excavation location, which included treatment with a 4% boron-based WP-1 water solution and a PEG composite solution consisting of 7% urea, 21% dimethyl urea, and 10% PEG 4000 [17]. The concentration of the PEG composite solution was incrementally raised until the saturation point of the woods was achieved, with a peak concentration of 40%. Further information on the ancient ship can be found in a prior study [17]. To assess the extent of deterioration in archaeological wood, recent healthy wood from the same species was selected for comparative analysis.

2.2. Microscopic Identification

The methodology employed in this study for determining the species of the archaeological wood primarily adhered to the sectioning protocol delineated in ISO 13061-1 (2014) [18]. Firstly, the archaeological wood was cut into 10 small blocks with dimensions of 5 mm × 5 mm × 10 mm (radial × tangential × longitudinal), which were subsequently boiled in distilled water until they sank. After cooling, the blocks were sliced using a Leica manual rotary microtome (Histo Core Biocutr, Ernst Leitz Company, Witzler, Hesse, Germany) to produce consistent thin sections (10–20 μm) from tangential, radial, and cross-sectional surfaces. These sections were then treated with a 1.0% safranin solution for 30 min, followed by two rounds of dehydration using 50%, 70%, and 95% ethanol. After the treatment, the samples were extracted with forceps and mounted on glass slides. Subsequently, the prepared archaeological wood specimens were examined for their microstructure using an Axio Scope A1 Zeiss polarizing microscope (Carl Zeiss Company, Jena, Germany) to identify the species, considering the macroscopic features of the wood blocks.

2.3. Physical Properties

The evaluation of physical properties of archaeological wood entailed a comparison of different parameters between the archaeological wood (AW) and recent healthy wood (RHW) of the same species. Each set of AW and RHW samples were prepared as 20 × 20 × 20 mm (radial × tangential × longitudinal) small blocks, with 10 blocks in each group. Surface moisture was removed with a towel every 24 h, and the blocks were promptly weighed (accurately to within 0.001 g). The data were recorded until the mass variance between successive measurements fell below 0.2%, signifying the point at which the wood reached saturation. The specimens were dried to a constant weight in an oven at 103 ± 2 °C, following ISO 13061-1 (2014) [18].
The maximum moisture content (MMC) and basic density (Db) can be calculated as follows [19,20]:
M M C = m m 0 m 0 × 100 %
D b = m 0 a m a x × b m a x × l m a x = m 0 v m a x
where, m and m0 are the masses of water-saturated and dry wood (g); and amax, bmax, and lmax represent radial, tangential, and longitudinal dimensions of the waterlogged wood, respectively (cm).
Porosity (P), the maximum shrinkage rate of wood in three characteristic directions (ShD), and the total volume (ShV) were also calculated according to the formulae [21]:
P = ( 1 m 0 ρ w s × a 0 × b 0 × c 0 ) × 100 %
S h V = V m V 0 V m × 100 %
S h D = l a l b l a × 100 %
where a0, b0, and c0 represent the radial, tangential, and longitudinal dimensions of the dried specimens (in cm), respectively, ρ w s means the density of wood substance (g/cm3), which is generally 1.54 according to Ugolev (1986) [22], and la and lb are the lengths of the waterlogged and dry wood (in cm).
The results of these physical properties were then examined in SAS (version 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) to conduct a comparative study of different wood types through t-tests at a significance level of p = 0.05.

2.4. Mechanical Properties and Morphological Characteristics

Specimens of AW and RHW with dimensions of 20 × 20 × 30 mm (radial × tangential × longitudinal) were prepared for the assessment of mechanical properties, with 15 specimens assigned to each group. A destructive loading test was performed with a Shimadzu universal testing instrument AGS-X (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) following ISO 13061-17 (2017) [23]. The specimens were placed at the center of the spherical movable support of the testing machine, loaded at a uniform speed, and broken within 1 to 5 min. The mean forces of five samples were recorded, and tensile strength was calculated by the formula:
σ 0 = P m a x b t
where σ0 represents the longitudinal compressive strength of the dried specimens (MPa), Pmax is the maximum destructive load (N), and b and t represent the width and thickness of the wood specimens (in mm), respectively.
The microstructure of the AW and RHW specimens was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) Hitachi S-3400N II (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). To enhance the conductivity of the wood samples and obtain clearer images, a gold palladium SEM annular sputtering target 2″ ID × 3″ OD × 0.1 mm Anatech was applied to the surface of the specimens.

2.5. Chemical Properties

For the quantification of holocellulose and acid-insoluble lignin in wood, 500 g each of air-dried AW and RHW samples were ground to 40–60 mesh. Holocellulose and acid-insoluble lignin contents were determined using the TAPPI T204 cm-97 [24] and TAPPI T22 om-02 standards [25].
The crystal structures of the archaeological wood and recent healthy wood were investigated by X-ray diffractometer. Powdered samples that went through a 200 mesh were examined using Ultima IV X-ray diffractometry (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The diffracted intensity of Cu Ka radiation (under a condition of 40 KV and 30 mA) was measured in a 2θ range between 5° and 60° and at a scan speed of 2°/min. The crystallinity index (Crl) was calculated by comparing the intensities of the crystalline and amorphous peaks [26]:
C r l = ( I 002 I a m ) / I 002 × 100 %
where Crl represents the crystallinity of the wood cellulose (%), I002 is the maximum intensity of the diffraction peak of the (002) crystal plane near 2θ = 22°, and Iam stands for the intensity of the diffraction peak in the amorphous region near 2θ = 18°.
To examine the chemical deterioration of the archaeological wood, powdered samples from oven-dried wood were processed into 200 mesh KBr pellets for FT-IR analysis. The infrared spectra of the AW and RHW wood specimens were recorded in KBr tablets on a Bruker ALPHA FT-IR spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), with a resolution of 0.01 cm−1 using the 4000–500 cm−1 spectral range. For spectral processing, the OriginPro 2021 software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA) was used. Five recordings were performed for each analyzed sample, and the average spectrum obtained was used for the evaluation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microscopic Identification

In wood identification, both the macroscopic characteristics and microscopic structures of wood provide important information [27]. In this research, after removing impurities from the surface of the selected samples, the cross-section clearly illustrated vessels and distinct growth rings. The drastic change in vessel size from earlywood to latewood indicates that the archaeological wood was a ring porous hardwood. Additionally, the large ray cells on both radial and tangential sections are prominently visible.
The microscopic image depicted in Figure 1a illustrates that in the earlywood zone of the cross-section, the vessels are elliptical in shape. Most individual vessel pores in the earlywood area are arranged continuously, forming groups of 2–3 pores aligned radially. The latewood vessel pores are small to medium in size, typically forming clusters of 4–10 vessel cells, with some arranged in a wave-like tangential pattern. Certain small vessels exhibit localized overlapping spiral thickenings on their walls. These vessels feature single perforations, either circular or oval, arranged alternately with bordered pits. Axial parenchyma cells are sparsely connected to the vessels, creating tangential bands in the earlywood region. The end walls of parenchyma cells show distinct or indistinct thickening, devoid of crystals but containing gum. Wood fibers exhibit varying thicknesses in their walls, with bordered pits present. Rays are non-storied, typically comprising 2–6 rows and measuring 8–20 cells in height. Ray tissues consist of multiseriate rays, occasionally with uniseriate rays, characterized by circular, oval, and polygonal outlines of ray cells. These cells contain gum, possess thickened end walls, and lack crystals. Based on the macroscopic structure and microscopic features [28,29], in conjunction with the distribution of forest resources and tree species at the excavation site, it has been concluded that the archaeological timber originated from Ulmus parvifolia Jacq.

3.2. Physical Characterization

Typically, waterlogged archaeological wood subjected to microbial attack undergoes varying degrees of cellulose and hemicellulose degradation [30,31]. The hydrophilic small molecules produced during deterioration increase the water absorption capacity of the wood, which explains the much higher MMC and lower density of AW samples compared to the RHW samples. Table 1 presents the maximum moisture content (MMC), basic density (Db), porosity (P), and shrinkage rate (Sh) of AW and RHW specimens for physical characterization. The maximum moisture content of 218.66% in AW is 2.13 times of the 102.61% observed in RHW. Referring to De Jong’s criteria [32,33], archaeological wood with MMC ranging from 135% to 225% should be classified as the first grade of deterioration, which means the AW samples employed in this study are mildly degraded. The comparison reveals that the AW samples exhibit a fundamental density of 0.396 g/cm3 and a porosity of 68.80%, while the RHW samples demonstrate values of 0.765 g/cm3 and 43.89%, respectively. These results suggest a reduction in basic density and porosity resulting from degradation, which considerably weakens the mechanical strength of AW cell walls [34]. The statistical analysis (p < 0.001) further validates notable differences in MMC, basic density, and porosity between AW and RHW samples.
Affected by prolonged deterioration, archaeological wood exhibits weakened cell walls due to the tension resulting from water evaporation and subsequent cell wall contraction [35,36,37,38]. Therefore, shrinkage rates are critical indicators of wood degradation. For the archaeological wood in the current study, the shrinkage rates in the tangential, radial, and longitudinal directions were measured at 8.67%, 8.46%, and 2.23%, respectively, higher than typical values. These results are in line with the volumetric shrinkage displayed, where the AW samples are 1.48 to 2.23 times higher than those of the RHW samples. It is important to stress that these multiples are significantly lower compared to the levels of severely degraded wood documented in prior research [39,40,41]. Consequently, the archaeological wood analyzed in this research should be considered as mildly degraded.

3.3. Mechanical Properties and Morphological Characteristics

Mechanical property assessments play a crucial role in determining the structural integrity and long-term durability of archaeological wood [42]. As illustrated in Figure 2, the compressive strength of the archaeological wood (AW) samples was recorded at 36.12 MPa, a notable decrease compared to the 62.91 MPa found in the modern healthy reference wood (RHW). This decline can be primarily attributed to the deterioration of wood cell walls and the breakdown of the fiber structure [9]. Additionally, the increased presence of pores in the archaeological wood diminishes its ability to withstand pressure, resulting in compromised mechanical properties that render it more susceptible to damage when subjected to external forces.
According to the scanning electron microscope images (Figure 3), the growth rings and vessels are clearly characterized on the cross section. Despite the accumulation of wood fragments within vessels, the cell lumens of the archaeological wood samples retain a relatively intact microscopic morphology. This suggests that the internal tissues have maintained a degree of mechanical strength sufficient to resist collapse during the drying process. The structural characteristics of the wood rays in the radial section remain discernible (the arrows), regardless of a noticeable relaxation in the arrangement of the wood fiber cells. The image of the tangential section reveals clearly identifiable fiber cells and rays, indicating that the level of deterioration in this wood sample has not reached a critically severe stage.

3.4. Chemical Properties

The changes in the physical and mechanical properties of archaeological wood are attributed to alterations in its chemical composition. Table 2 presents the content of holocellulose and acid-insoluble lignin in AW and RHW. For archaeological wood, holocellulose accounts for 48.09% of the composition, which is only 61.78% of that present in the RHW samples. This finding is consistent with previous studies [43,44,45,46], underscoring the importance of holocellulose degradation and the inherent chemical and biological resistance of lignin in the decay mechanisms of archaeological wood.
Diffractometric analysis has been employed to evaluate the crystallinity index (CI) of cellulose, which is the sole crystalline constituent in wood, given that hemicellulose and lignin are completely amorphous.
Figure 4 displays the X-ray diffraction patterns of both the AW and RHW, demonstrating essential similarities in their profiles. In the recent wood spectra, the characteristics peaks at 2θ = 15.2°, 22.2°, 24°, and 30° can be observed, corresponding to crystallographic planes of cellulose [47]. The XRD spectrum of AW presents additional diffraction peaks at 2θ = 21°, 26.7°, and 27.8°, which can be ascribed to crystalline compounds due to waterlogging. Notably, the diffraction intensity of the RHW is marginally higher than that of the AW, suggesting a decline in cellulose content in the AW samples used for analysis. According to the formula outlined in Section 2.5, the cellulose crystallinity of archaeological wood was determined to be 38.21%, which is slightly lower than the 42.46% found in recent healthy wood. These results indicate that the cellulose in the AW had become degraded to some extent [48,49].
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy is an essential technique for assessing the degradation or transformation of wood components, as changes in specific characteristic peaks, including their emergence, disappearance, enhancement, or weakening, indicate alterations in the wood’s chemical composition [50,51,52,53]. Figure 5 represents the FT-IR spectra of the AW and RHW, revealing a fundamental similarity between them. Prominent peaks at 3400 cm−1, 2925 cm−1, 2855 cm−1, and 1025 cm−1 are visualized [54], corresponding to the stretching vibration of hydroxyl (-OH), C-H asymmetrical stretching, C-H symmetrical stretching, and -C-O-C- stretching vibration, respectively.
Significant changes are observed in the spectral comparison between AW and RHW in the range of 1800–1200 cm−1. One of the most striking differences is seen at the peak 1730 cm−1, associated with the C=O stretching of acetyl or carboxylic acid [55]. This peak is nearly absent in the AW spectra, indicating a notable deterioration of cellulose and hemicellulose within the archaeological samples. However, the two characteristic peaks associated with lignin at 1597 cm−1 and 1505 cm−1 in AW remain intact and exhibit slightly higher intensities compared to those in RHW [56]. This feature agrees with the higher relative content of acid-insoluble lignin presented in AW as outlined in Table 2. Furthermore, slight weakening of the peaks at 1370 cm−1 and 1223 cm−1 in the archaeological wood suggests cellulose degradation [57]. Chemical property analyses reveal that the primary mode of degradation in archaeological wood involves the breakdown of cellulose and hemicellulose. Specifically, cellulose undergoes considerable degradation, whereas lignin exhibits relative stability with a slight increase in its proportion.

4. Conclusions

The comprehensive analysis of the physical, mechanical, morphological, and chemical properties of archaeological wood samples, identified as belonging to the Ulmus parvifolia Jacq, has provided valuable insights into the degradation processes and characteristics of the wood. The identification of the tree species underlines the historical significance of Ulmus wood as a crucial material for shipbuilding during the Qing Dynasty. Examination of parameters such as maximum moisture content, basic density, and porosity confirmed mild degradation levels in the wood from the Luoyang Canal No.1 ancient ship. Additionally, detailed chemical property analyses revealed that the degradation of the archaeological wood primarily stemmed from the breakdown of cellulose and hemicellulose, while lignin demonstrated a relatively stable nature. These results not only deepen our comprehension of the wood’s condition, but also provide critical values for the consequent restoration and preservation. They stress the urgent need for conservation strategies to protect this historical artifact for future generations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.Y., X.L. and W.M.; methodology, W.Y. and X.L.; software, W.M. and X.L.; validation, W.Y., X.L. and W.M.; formal analysis, W.Y., X.L. and W.M.; investigation, W.Y., X.L. and W.M.; data curation, W.Y., X.L. and W.M.; writing, original draft preparation, W.Y., X.L. and W.M.; writing, review and editing, W.Y. and X.L.; visualization, W.M.; supervision, X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Nanjing Forestry University Foundation for Basic Research, Grant No. 163104127 and the Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Province, China.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the College of Furnishings and Industrial Design, Nanjing Forestry University for providing the experimental conditions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sun, G.R.; He, Y.R.; Wu, Z.H. Effects of thermal treatment on the dimensional stability and chemical constituents of new and aged camphorwood. BioResources 2022, 17, 4186–4195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Feng, X.; Sheng, Y.; Ge, X.; Wu, Z.; Huang, Q. Evaluation of The Properties of Hybrid Yellow Poplar (Liriodendron Sino-Americanum): A Comparison Study with Yellow Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera). Maderas-Cienc. Y Tecnol. 2021, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Feng, X.; Chen, J.; Yu, S.; Wu, Z.; Huang, Q. Mild Hydrothermal Modification of Beech Wood (Zelkova schneideriana Hand-Mzt): Its Physical, Structural, and Mechanical Properties. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2022, 80, 933–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, X.; Xu, X.; Tu, X.; Ma, W.; Huang, H.; Varodi, A.M. Characteristics of Ancient Ship Wood from Taicang of the Yuan Dynasty. Materials 2023, 16, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Grattan, D.W. Waterlogged Wood. Conserv. Mar. Archaeol. Objects 1987, 1, 55–67. [Google Scholar]
  6. Björdal, C.G. Microbial Degradation of Waterlogged Archaeological Wood. J. Cult. Herit. 2012, 13, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Broda, M.; Hill, C.A. Conservation of Waterlogged Wood—Past, Present and Future Perspectives. Forests 2021, 12, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Majka, J.; Zborowska, M.; Fejfer, M.; Waliszewska, B.; Olek, W. Dimensional Stability and Hygroscopic Properties of PEG Treated Irregularly Degraded Waterlogged Scots Pine Wood. J. Cult. Herit. 2018, 31, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bjurhager, I.; Halonen, H.; Lindfors, E.L.; Iversen, T.; Almkvist, G.; Gamstedt, E.K.; Berglund, L.A. State of Degradation in Archaeological Oak from the 17th Century Vasa Ship: Substantial Strength Loss Correlates with Reduction in (Holo) Cellulose Molecular Weight. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13, 2521–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cao, H.; Gao, X.; Chen, J.; Xi, G.; Yin, Y.; Guo, J. Changes in Moisture Characteristics of Waterlogged Archaeological Wood Owing to Microbial Degradation. Forests 2022, 14, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, R.; Guo, J.; Macchioni, N.; Pizzo, B.; Xi, G.; Tian, X.; Chen, J.; Sun, J.; Jiang, X.; Cao, J.; et al. Characterisation of Waterlogged Archaeological Wood from Nanhai No. 1 Shipwreck by Multidisciplinary Diagnostic Methods. J. Cult. Herit. 2022, 56, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Muyzer, G.; Stams, A.J.M. The Ecology and Biotechnology of Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 441–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kilic, N.; Kiliç, A.G. Analysis of Waterlogged Woods: Example of Yenikapi Shipwreck. Art-Sanat Derg. 2018, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  14. Blanchette, R.A.; Nilsson, T.; Daniel, G.; Abad, A.R. Biological Degradation of Wood. In Archaeological Wood: Properties, Chemistry, and Preservation; Rowell, R.M., Barbour, R.J., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1990; pp. 141–174. [Google Scholar]
  15. Giachi, G.; Capretti, C.; Macchioni, N.; Pizzo, B.; Donato, I.D. A Methodological Approach in the Evaluation of the Efficacy of Treatments for the Dimensional Stabilisation of Waterlogged Archaeological Wood. J. Cult. Herit. 2010, 11, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Broda, M.; Mazela, B.; Krolikowska-Pataraja, K.; Siuda, J. The State of Degradation of Waterlogged Wood from Different Environments. In Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW. Forestry and Wood Technology; Warsaw University of Life Sciences: Warsaw, Poland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu, X.; Ma, W.; Tu, X.; Huang, H.; Varodi, A.M. Study on the Wood Characteristics of the Chinese Ancient Ship Luoyang I. Materials 2023, 6, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. ISO 13061–1:2014; Physical and Mechanical Properties of Wood—Test Methods for Small Clear Wood Specimens—Part 1: Determination of Moisture Content for Physical and Mechanical Tests. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
  19. Hoffmann, P.; Jones, M.A. Structure and Degradation Process for Waterlogged Archaeological Wood. In Archaeological Wood: Properties, Chemistry, and Preservation; Rowell, R.M., Barbour, R.J., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1990; pp. 35–65. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jensen, P.; Gregory, D.J. Selected Physical Parameters to Characterize the State of Preservation of Archaeological Wood: A Practical Guide for Their Determination. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2006, 33, 551–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Varivodina, I.; Kosichenko, N.; Varivodin, V.; Sedliačik, J. Interconnections Among the Rate of Growth, Porosity, and Wood Water Absorption. Wood Res. 2010, 55, 59–66. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ugolev, B.N. Wood Science and Bases of Forest Commodity Science: Textbook for Higher Educational Institutions of Forestry Engineering; MGUL: Moscow, Russia, 1986; p. 351. [Google Scholar]
  23. ISO 13061–17:2017; Physical and Mechanical Properties of Wood—Test Methods for Small Clear Wood Specimens—Part 17: Determination of Ultimate Stress in Compression Parallel to Grain. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
  24. Tappi, T. 204 cm-97, Solvent Extractives of Wood and Pulp; Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry (TAPPI): Atlanta, GA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tappi, T. 222 cm-02, Acid-Insoluble Lignin in Wood and Pulp; Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry (TAPPI): Atlanta, GA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  26. Segal, L.; Creely, J.J.; Martin, A.E., Jr.; Conrad, C.M. An Empirical Method for Estimating the Degree of Crystallinity of Native Cellulose Using the X-ray Diffractometer. Text. Res. J. 1959, 29, 786–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Steele, J.H.; Ifju, G.; Johnson, J.A. Quantitative Characterization of Wood Microstructure. J. Microsc. 1976, 107, 297–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cheng, J.; Yang, J.; Liu, P. Chinese Wood Flora; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang, C.; Yu, C.; Liu, M.; Peter, B. Formation and Influencing Factors of Dew in Sparse Elm Woods and Grassland in a Semi-Arid area. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2017, 37, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, X.; Zhu, L.; Tu, X.; Zhang, C.; Huang, H.; Varodi, A.M. Characteristics of Ancient Shipwreck Wood from Huaguang Jiao No. 1 after Desalination. Materials 2023, 16, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gao, J.; Li, J.; Qiu, J.; Guo, M. Degradation assessment of waterlogged wood at Haimenkou site. Frat. Ed Integrità Strutt. 2014, 8, 495–501. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jong, J. Conservation Techniques for Old Archaeological Wood from Shipwrecks Found in the Netherlands. In Biodeterioration Investigation Techniques; Walters, A.H., Ed.; Applied Science: London, UK, 1977; pp. 295–338. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kennedy, A.; Pennington, E.R. Conservation of Chemically Degraded Waterlogged Wood with Sugars. Stud. Conserv. 2014, 59, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Babiński, L.; Izdebska-Mucha, D.; Waliszewska, B. Evaluation of the State of Preservation of Waterlogged Archaeological Wood Based on Its Physical Properties: Basic Density vs. Wood Substance Density. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2014, 46, 372–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhou, T.; Liu, H. Research Progress of Wood Cell Wall Modification and Functional Improvement: A Review. Materials 2022, 15, 1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yin, Q.; Liu, H. Drying Stress and Strain of Wood: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Zhao, M.; Liu, H. Study on free shrinkage and rheological characteristics of Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis during conventional drying. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2024, 2311827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zheng, J.; Xu, X.; Yang, L. Dewatering characteristics of Juglans mandshurica wood using supercritical carbon dioxide: A comparison with conventional drying. Dry. Technol. 2024, 42, 2324931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lionetto, F.; Quarta, G.; Cataldi, A.; Auriemma, R.; Calcagnile, L.; Frigione, M. Characterization and Dating of Waterlogged Woods from an Ancient Harbor in Italy. J. Cult. Herit. 2014, 15, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Han, Y.; Du, J.; Huang, X.; Ma, K.; Wang, Y.; Guo, P.; Pan, J. Chemical Properties and Microbial Analysis of Waterlogged Archaeological Wood from the Nanhai No. 1 Shipwreck. Forests 2021, 12, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guo, J.; Xiao, L.; Han, L.; Wu, H.; Yang, T.; Wu, S.; Yin, Y. Deterioration of the Cell Wall in Waterlogged Wooden Archaeological Artifacts, 2400 Years Old. IAWA J. 2019, 40, 820–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Emara, M.; Barris, C.; Baena, M.; Torres, L.; Barros, J. Bond behavior of NSM CFRP laminates in concrete under sustained loading. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 177, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pecoraro, E.; Pizzo, B.; Alves, A.; Macchioni, N.; Rodrigues, J.C. Measuring the Chemical Composition of Waterlogged Decayed Wood by Near Infrared Spectroscopy. Microchem. J. 2015, 122, 176–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Passialis, C.N. Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Waterlogged Archaeological Wood. Holzforschung 1997, 51, 111–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xia, Y.; Chen, T.Y.; Wen, J.L.; Zhao, Y.-L.; Qiu, J.; Sun, R.-C. Multi-Analysis of Chemical Transformations of Lignin Macromolecules from Waterlogged Archaeological Wood. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 109, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Colombini, M.P.; Lucejko, J.J.; Modugno, F.; Orlandi, M.; Tolppa, E.L.; Zoia, L. A multi-analytical study of degradation of lignin in archaeological waterlogged wood. Talanta 2009, 80, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Toba, K.; Yamamoto, H.; Yoshida, M. Crystallization of Cellulose Microfibrils in Wood Cell Wall by Repeated Dry-and-Wet Treatment, Using X-Ray Diffraction Technique. Cellulose 2013, 20, 633–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. High, K.E.; Penkman, K.E. A Review of Analytical Methods for Assessing Preservation in Waterlogged Archaeological Wood and Their Application in Practice. Heritage Sci. 2020, 8, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Han, L.; Tian, X.; Keplinger, T.; Zhou, H.; Li, R.; Svedström, K.; Burgert, I.; Yin, Y.; Guo, J. Even Visually Intact Cell Walls in Waterlogged Archaeological Wood Are Chemically Deteriorated and Mechanically Fragile: A Case of a 170 Year-Old Shipwreck. Molecules 2020, 25, 1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Shen, Z. Nanocellulose Based Filtration Membrane in Industrial Waste Water Treatment: A Review. Materials 2021, 14, 5398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Antonelli, F.; Galotta, G.; Sidoti, G.; Zikeli, F.; Nisi, R.; Davidde Petriaggi, B.; Romagnoli, M. Cellulose and lignin nano-scale consolidants for waterlogged archaeological wood. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Liu, X.; Tu, X.; Ma, W.; Zhang, C.; Huang, H.; Varodi, A.M. Consolidation and Dehydration of Waterlogged Archaeological Wood from Site Huaguangjiao No.1. Forests 2022, 13, 1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Christensen, M.; Frosch, M.; Jensen, P.; Schnell, U.; Shashoua, Y.; Nielsen, O.F. Waterlogged Archaeological Wood—Chemical Changes by Conservation and Degradation. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2006, 37, 1171–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhu, X.; Kaal, J.; Traoré, M.; Kuang, Y. Characterization of modern and waterlogged archaeological cypress (Glyptostrobus pensilis) wood: An analytical pyrolysis (Py-GC-MS and THM-GC-MS) and infrared spectroscopy (FTIR-ATR) study of within tree (radial) and decay-induced compositional variations. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2024, 177, 106347. [Google Scholar]
  55. Han, L.; Guo, J.; Tian, X.; Jiang, X.; Yin, Y. Evaluation of PEG and sugars consolidated fragile waterlogged archaeological wood using nanoindentation and ATR-FTIR imaging. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2022, 170, 105390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jiang, J.; Li, J.; Gao, Q. Effect of flame retardant treatment on dimensional stability and thermal degradation of wood. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 75, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Popescu, M.C.; Jones, D.; Krzisnik, D.; Humar, M. Determination of the effectiveness of a combined thermal/chemical wood modification by the use of FTIR spectroscopy and chemometric methods. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1200, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Microscopic images of archaeological wood in cross section (a), radial section (b) and tangential section (c).
Figure 1. Microscopic images of archaeological wood in cross section (a), radial section (b) and tangential section (c).
Forests 15 00963 g001
Figure 2. Comparison between the compressive strength (MPa) of recent healthy wood and archaeological wood samples.
Figure 2. Comparison between the compressive strength (MPa) of recent healthy wood and archaeological wood samples.
Forests 15 00963 g002
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of archaeological wood samples in different sections.
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of archaeological wood samples in different sections.
Forests 15 00963 g003
Figure 4. X-RD spectra of archaeological wood and recent healthy wood.
Figure 4. X-RD spectra of archaeological wood and recent healthy wood.
Forests 15 00963 g004
Figure 5. FT-IR spectra of archaeological wood and recent healthy wood.
Figure 5. FT-IR spectra of archaeological wood and recent healthy wood.
Forests 15 00963 g005
Table 1. Mean values of maximum moisture content (%), basic density (g/cm3), porosity (%), and shrinkage rate (%) of archaeological wood (AW) and recent healthy wood (RHW). p-value less than 0.001 indicates a statistically significant result.
Table 1. Mean values of maximum moisture content (%), basic density (g/cm3), porosity (%), and shrinkage rate (%) of archaeological wood (AW) and recent healthy wood (RHW). p-value less than 0.001 indicates a statistically significant result.
Wood Type →
Parameters ↓
Archaeological WoodRecent Healthy Woodp-Value
Maximum moisture content (%)218.66 ± 7.96 1102.61 ± 8.51<0.001 2
Basic density (g/cm3)0.396 ± 0.0150.765 ± 0.016<0.001
Porosity(%)68.80 ± 1.1843.89 ± 1.26<0.001
Shrinkage
rate (%)
Tangential8.67 ± 0.435.84 ± 0.46<0.001
Radial8.46 ± 0.563.80 ± 0.60<0.001
Longitudinal2.23 ± 0.971.16 ± 0.910.063
Volume17.46 ± 0.9211.44 ± 0.99<0.001
Note: 1 Arithmetic mean of ten values ± standard error; 2 Wood type was used as a factor, p value for the significance analysis via t-test was at the 0.05 level.
Table 2. The content of holocellulose and acid-insoluble lignin in AW and RHW.
Table 2. The content of holocellulose and acid-insoluble lignin in AW and RHW.
Chemical ComponentsArchaeological WoodRecent Healthy Wood
Holocellulose (%)48.09 ± 2.9677.83 ± 3.51
Acid-insoluble lignin (%)39.41 ± 2.1523.12 ± 1.16
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, W.; Ma, W.; Liu, X. Evaluation of Deterioration Degree of Archaeological Wood from Luoyang Canal No. 1 Ancient Ship. Forests 2024, 15, 963. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15060963

AMA Style

Yang W, Ma W, Liu X. Evaluation of Deterioration Degree of Archaeological Wood from Luoyang Canal No. 1 Ancient Ship. Forests. 2024; 15(6):963. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15060963

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Weiwei, Wanrong Ma, and Xinyou Liu. 2024. "Evaluation of Deterioration Degree of Archaeological Wood from Luoyang Canal No. 1 Ancient Ship" Forests 15, no. 6: 963. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15060963

APA Style

Yang, W., Ma, W., & Liu, X. (2024). Evaluation of Deterioration Degree of Archaeological Wood from Luoyang Canal No. 1 Ancient Ship. Forests, 15(6), 963. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15060963

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop