Next Article in Journal
Burning Potential of Fire Refuges in the Boreal Mixedwood Forest
Previous Article in Journal
Can Retention Harvest Maintain Natural Structural Complexity? A Comparison of Post-Harvest and Post-Fire Residual Patches in Boreal Forest
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 7
Issue 10
10.3390/f7100244
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of 40 and 80 Years of Conifer Regrowth on Soil Microbial Activities and Community Structure in Subtropical Low Mountain Forests

by
Ed-Haun Chang
1,
Tsai-Huei Chen
2,
Guang-long Tian
3,
Chun-Kai Hsu
2 and
Chih-Yu Chiu
4,*
1
Mackay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management, Beitou, Taipei 112, Taiwan
2
Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Taipei 10066, Taiwan
3
Environmental Monitoring and Research Division, Monitoring and Research Department, Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago, IL 60804, USA
4
Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Nangang, Taipei 11529, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2016, 7(10), 244; https://doi.org/10.3390/f7100244
Submission received: 5 September 2016 / Revised: 17 October 2016 / Accepted: 18 October 2016 / Published: 21 October 2016
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The effects of long-term reforestation on soil microbial communities and biomass are poorly understood. This study was conducted on two coniferous plantations: Cunninghamia konishii Hayata, planted 40 years ago (CONIF-40), and Calocedrus formosana (Florin) Florin, planted 80 years ago (CONIF-80). An adjacent natural broadleaf forest (BROAD-Nat) was used as a control. We determined microbial biomass C and N contents, enzyme activities, and community composition (via phospholipid fatty acid [PLFA] assessment). Both microbial biomass and PLFA content were higher in the summer than in the winter and differed among the forests in summer only. Total PLFA, total bacterial, gram-positive bacterial, gram-negative bacterial, and vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal contents followed the same pattern. Total fungal content and the ratios of fungi to bacteria and of gram-positive to gram-negative bacteria were highest in CONIF-40, with no difference between the other forests. Principal component analysis of PLFA contents revealed that CONIF-40 communities were distinct from those of CONIF-80 and BROAD-Nat. Our results suggest that vegetation replacement during reforestation exerts a prolonged impact on the soil microbial community. The understory broadleaf shrubs and trees established after coniferous plantation reforestation may balance out the effects of coniferous litter, contributing to bacterial recovery.

1. Introduction

The management of forest ecosystems, such as harvesting, burning, deforestation, and reforestation, results not only in quantitative and qualitative changes in soil C and N contents but also in eventual changes in the microbial community [1,2]. Tree type is a primary factor affecting the microbial community structure in forest soils as it controls the input of substrate type to soil [3] and soil chemical properties, such as the C content, C/N ratio, and pH [4]. Reforestation with exotic and mostly single species at original natural forest sites has changed the soil microbial community in subtropical areas [5,6]. Ushio et al. [7] indicated that tree species had a direct impact on the soil microbial community in tropical montane forests. Likewise, these authors suggested that coniferous forest soils exhibited higher ratios of gram-positive (G+) to gram-negative (G−) bacteria and fungi to bacteria than did broadleaf forests.
After reforestation, the microbial community structure evolves over time to approach that in native forest soils. Using phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA) analysis, Moore-Kucera and Dick [8] found that soil total PLFA, as well as total bacteria and fungi were lower in an 8-year-old replanted forest than in old-growth forests. However, those in a 25-year-old replanted site were similar to those of an old-growth forest. Considerable research has been conducted to assess the response of the soil microbial community under secondary forests in temperate regions [9]. PLFA has been used to estimate changes in the soil microbial community after forest management [10]. Comparatively less attention has been paid to this subject in subtropical forests, where higher temperatures and precipitation may elicit a different response from the soil microbial community under secondary forests [11,12]. Furthermore, little information is available on the extent to which microbial communities differ between native forests and 50 to 100-year-old reforested areas.
Many studies have reported that coniferous and broadleaf tree species exert strong influences on soil microbial communities [7,13]. However, a recent study by Wang et al. [14] showed that differences in bacterial community structure between coniferous and broadleaf forests disappeared due to changes in soil properties. In an attempt to promote the economical production of timber, reforested conifers replaced several native broadleaf hardwood forests decades ago in a low- to high-elevation subtropical montane region in central Taiwan. Our previous study suggested that disturbances during forest conversion influence the soil bacterial community, eliciting differences among three forest ecosystems in the same climate [15]. The results of Lin et al. [15] also revealed that soil bacterial community diversity in 40-year-old coniferous forest was greater than that in 80-year-old coniferous forest, which was in turn greater than that in natural broadleaf forest, reflecting a trend of disturbance.
We hypothesized that the soil microbial community of secondary forests would establish a similar structure to that of a natural system of a different vegetation type after a sufficient period of time. We therefore compared the soil microbial community structure in a 40-year-old and an 80-year-old secondary coniferous forest with that of a native broadleaf forest. We used PLFA analysis to provide quantitative data on the structure of microbial communities [16,17] and evaluated similarities in community structure across the different forest types. We found that while soil microbial communities differed between native broadleaf forests and 40-year-old coniferous forests, such differences were reduced between native broadleaf and 80-year-old coniferous forests. The understory broadleaf shrubs and trees established after the long-term reforestation of coniferous plantations may contribute to the recovery of bacteria in these secondary forests.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description

This study was conducted at the Lienhuachi Experimental Forest in a subtropical low mountain area in central Taiwan (23°54′ N, 120°54′ E). The elevation ranges from 600 to 950 m above sea level, with a mean annual precipitation of 2200 mm and a mean annual temperature of 20.8 °C. Soils are moderately well drained and classified as Typic Dystrudept (U.S. Soil Taxonomy). As one of the few remaining low-elevation, natural, undisturbed forests in central Taiwan, the site is part of a long-term ecological study covering 461 ha of a low-altitude forest ecosystem, including 261 ha belonging to evergreen natural broadleaf hardwood forest dominated by Fagaceae and Lauraceae species. Coniferous plantations established 80 and 40 years ago with Calocedrus formosana (Florin) Florin and Cunninghamia konishii Hayata, respectively, replaced approximately 50% of the native forests on this study site.
The study included the two coniferous plantations, i.e. the 40-year-old C. konishii plantation (CONIF-40) and the 80-year-old C. formosana plantation (CONIF-80), as well as a natural broadleaf forest (BROAD-Nat) as the control. The CONIF-80 and CONIF-40 plantations, which were established by reforestation with coniferous trees after the native forest was cleared, encompass 5 and 100 ha, respectively. The BROAD-Nat forest exhibits a high diversity of plant species and an even species composition dominated by tree species in the families Lauraceae and Fagaceae. BROAD-Nat trees exhibit a mean height of 10–18 m, a density of 1450 stems/ha, and a diameter at breast height (DBH) of 10–30 cm (Table 1). Several hardwood tree species in the BROAD-Nat forest form a canopy structure with multiple layers.
In the CONIF-80 forest, C. formosana is the major species, with a mean height of 27 m, a density of 275 stems/ha, and a DBH of 48 cm. With a space of 6 m × 6 m, the forest has an open canopy allowing sunshine to pass through. Regrowth of broadleaf trees, including Randia cochinchinensis (Lour.) Merr., Schefflera octophylla (Lour.) Harm, and Prunus phaeosticta (Hance) Maxim., forms the second layer of the canopy, with a mean height of 10 m and a density of 1850 stems/ha. Although the density of broadleaf regrowth trees in CONIF-80 is quite high, broadleaf trees make up much less of the canopy than do conifers.
In the CONIF-40 plantation, C. lanceolata grows to a mean height of 15.8 m, a density of 900 stems/ha, and a mean stand basal area of 36.0 m2/ha. This plantation also consists of regrowth of broadleaf trees, such as Styrax formosana Matsum. and S. octophylla, to a height of 10–12 m and a density of 260 stems/ha. The density of broadleaf tree regrowth in the CONIF-40 plantation is lower than that in the CONIF-80 plantation and therefore, there is not a multiple-canopy structure in the CONIF-40 plantation as there is in the CONIF-80 plantation and BROAD-Nat (Figure 1).

2.2. Soil Sampling and Analysis

Five plots (50 m × 50 m each) were established in each forest site for collection of soil samples. Three soil core samples were collected in each plot to create a composite sample. The soil samples were collected in February 2011 during the winter (dry) season and in August 2011 during the summer (wet) season at a depth of 0–10 cm using a soil auger that was 8 cm in diameter. Roots and litter were manually removed before samples were sieved through a 2-mm sieve. The samples were maintained at 4 °C in the dark. Several subsamples were air-dried and ground in order to analyze their physicochemical properties, such as total organic C and total N. Subsamples of fresh soil were also freeze-dried at −20 °C immediately after field sampling for PLFA analysis. Additional subsamples were weighed and oven-dried at 105 °C to determine moisture content in order to provide an oven-dried basis for comparison of analytical results. Soil organic C (Corg) and total N (Ntot) contents were determined using a Fisons NA1500 elemental analyzer (ThermoQuest Italia, Milan, Italy). Soil pH values of air-dried soil were measured using a combination glass electrode (soil:water ratio 1:2.5; [18]).

2.3. Biochemical Assays

The microbial biomass of each soil sample was determined using the chloroform fumigation extraction method [19]. Organic C retrieved through K2SO4 extraction was measured using a total organic carbon analyzer (Model 1010, OI Analytical, College Station, TX, USA) and converted to microbial biomass C (Cmic) assuming a conversion factor of 2.22 [20]. The microbial biomass N (Nmic) content was calculated from the ninhydrin-reactive N released from the biomass and determined colorimetrically at 560 nm [21].
Urease (EC 3.5.1.5) activity was determined as described in Kandeler and Gerber [22]. Phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.2) activity was determined using the method of Tabatabai and Bremner [23]. Cellulase (EC 3.2.1.4) and xylanase (EC 3.2.1.8) activities were determined using the method of Schinner and von Mersi [24].
PLFA extraction and analysis was performed using the methods described by Frostegard et al. [25]. Lipids were extracted using a single-phase mixture of the chloroform-methanol-citrate system. Phospholipids were then divided into neutral, glycol-, and phospholipids using a solid-phase extraction column and eluting with chloroform, acetone, and methanol, respectively. Next, phospholipids underwent methylation to form fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs). The FAMEs were analyzed using capillary gas chromatography (GC) and flame ionization detection with the Thermo Fisher TRACE chromatography system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). GC was performed according to the method of Chang et al. [26]. The fatty acid nomenclature was established according to Frostegard et al. [25]. The position of double bond is defined by symbol ω from the methyl end of the molecule. The prefix c refers to cis configuration. Iso and anteiso branching are designated by the prefix i or a, respectively. The prefix cy refers to cyclopropane fatty acids. The fatty acids i15:0, a15:0, 15:0, i16:0, 16:1ω7c, 17:0, i17:0, cy17:0, 18:1ω7c, and cy19:0 were categorized as being derived from bacteria: i15:0, a15:0, i16:0, and i17:0 from G+ bacteria; 16:1ω7c, cy17:0, 18:1ω7c, and cy19:0 from G− bacteria; and 10Me18:0 from actinomycetes. The fatty acid 18:2ω6c was categorized as being derived from fungi, and 16:1ω5c was categorized as being derived from vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi [16,27].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Two-way analysis of variance was used to assess vegetation-type and seasonal effects. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to determine the similarities between succession and native systems according to fatty acid concentration (mole %). Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to assess correlations between microbial parameters and soil properties. Statistical analyses were considered significant at p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Chemical and Physical Properties of Soils

Soil moisture was higher in the summer than in the winter (Table 2) because winters are dry in this area. The CONIF-40 forest contained the highest soil moisture content in the summer. The soil organic C and total N contents were highest in the CONIF-40 forest, with no significant differences between the CONIF-80 and BROAD-Nat forests. All soils were strongly acidic.

3.2. Soil Microbial Biomass

Soil Cmic and Nmic contents were significantly higher in the summer than in the winter. Soil Cmic and Nmic contents did not differ significantly among the three forests in the winter. During the summer, both soil Cmic and Nmic contents were higher in the BROAD-Nat forest than in the CONIF-40 and CONIF-80 forests. Ratios of Cmic/Corg and Nmic/Ntot were significantly different among the different forest soils, being higher in the BROAD-Nat forest than in the CONIF-40 and CONIF-80 forests (Table 2).

3.3. Soil Enzyme Activities

Soil xylanase, phosphatase, and urease activities were significantly affected by forest type and season. Summer soil cellulase, xylanase, and phosphatase activities were significantly higher in the CONIF-40 forest than in the BROAD-Nat forest (Table 3), with no significant difference between the CONIF-80 and BROAD-Nat forests. Soil enzyme activities in the winter did not differ among forest types, except for a lower xylanase activity in the CONIF-80 forest. Additionally, enzymatic activities were higher in the summer than in winter, except for xylanase.

3.4. Microbial Community Structure

Phospholipid acid biomarkers were significantly affected by forest type and season. In the summer, the total soil PLFA content as well as contents of bacteria, VAM fungi, actinomycetes, and G+ and G− bacteria were significantly lower in CONIF-40 and CONIF-80 samples than in BROAD-Nat samples (Table 4). Ratios of fungi to bacteria and of G+ to G− bacteria were also higher in CONIF-40 forest than in BROAD-Nat forest. Contents of total soil PLFA, bacteria, fungi, VAM fungi, actinomycetes, G+ bacteria, and G− bacteria were all lower in the winter than in the summer for all forest types, and values did not significantly differ among the three forests in the winter. However, as in summer, the ratio of fungi to bacteria was higher in the CONIF-40 forest than in the BROAD-Nat forest in the winter, while this ratio was similar between the CONIF-80 and BROAD-Nat forests during both seasons. The ratio of soil G+ to G− bacteria was higher in the winter than in the summer.
The PCA based on PLFA soil microbial communities in the summer indicated that the first principal component (PC1) and second principal component (PC2) accounted for 62% of the forest soil variation. The high loadings in PC1 included G+ bacteria (i15:0, a15:0, i16:0, and 10Me16:0; positive loadings) and G− bacteria (18:1ω7c and cy19:0; negative loadings) (Figure 2). The high loading in PC2 was a result of the actinomycetes (10Me17:0; positive loading). The majority of the variability was due to the differences between the CONIF-40 forest samples and those of CONIF-80 and BROAD-Nat forest. In this study, PC1 explains 43% of variability, and separates the CONIF-40 samples (positive loadings) from the CONIF-80 and BROAD-Nat samples (negative loadings). The PC2, which explains 19% of the variability, separates the samples CONIF-80 (negative loadings) from BROAD-Nat (positive loadings) (Figure 3). The CONIF-80 forest differed from the BROAD-Nat forest; however, this difference was smaller than that between CONIF-80 and CONIF-40. In winter, differences in the PLFA profiles of the three forest types were not as clear (Figure 4).

3.5. Correlations

Soil cellulase and phosphatase activities were positively correlated with Corg content (p < 0.05; Table 5). The total PLFA and G+ bacterial contents as well as soil enzyme activities, except xylanase, were positively correlated with soil Ntot content. Additionally, total PLFA content was positively correlated with Cmic content, while xylanase activity was negatively correlated with Cmic content. PLFA marker content, excluding fungal markers, was positively correlated with the Cmic/Corg ratio and soil moisture.

4. Discussion

Previous studies involving soil organic matter characterization using 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) at the same study site showed greater recalcitrant tannin and polyphenol contents in coniferous plantations (C. konishii and C. formosana) than in BROAD-Nat forest [28]. The resistance of coniferous litter to decomposition may contribute to the accumulation of C and N in soil. However, a decrease in the quality of organic matter input after the replacement of the native broadleaf vegetation with a pure coniferous plantation led to reductions in microbial C and N biomasses (Table 2). Swift et al. [29] showed that litter with a high C/N ratio, such as in coniferous forests, was a poor substrate for microbial growth. Both the Cmic and Nmic contents were high in the summer, low in the winter, and positively correlated with soil moisture (Table 5). Cool temperatures combined with low rainfall were responsible for the low microbial biomass in winter. Liu et al. [30] reported that the lack of water and low temperatures in winter reduced the microbial biomass in a tropical forest in China.
Several studies have shown that enzyme activities depend on the quality of organic matter [31,32]. Thus, differences in enzyme activities among forest types may have been due to differences in organic matter quality. The leaf litter in native broadleaf forests contains fewer components that are resistant to decomposition, leading to a faster decomposition rate than that of conifer litter [33]. The cellulase activity was positively correlated with the soil organic matter content and negatively correlated with pH (Table 5), in agreement with the results of Safari and Sharifi [34].
Community-level PLFA profiles are useful for detecting soil microbial community responses to various land uses or disturbances in ecosystems [35,36]. The litter derived from coniferous forests decomposes slowly; therefore, coniferous forests may provide fewer labile compounds than the native broadleaf forest. The G− bacterial content has been reported to increase with higher substrate availability [37,38]. Additionally, Kelly et al. [39] reported faster growth of G− compared to that of G+ bacteria in fertile environments. Not surprisingly, the G− bacterial content in our study was lower in coniferous soil than in broadleaf soil. G+ bacteria may be able to adapt to inferior conditions more effectively than G− bacteria, resulting in higher G+/G− ratios. The clearing of native forests and the conversion to coniferous species leads to environmental stress, which may explain the higher G+/G− ratio in CONIF-40 soil compared with that in BROAD-Nat soil. Likewise, Ushio et al. [7,40] reported a higher G+/G− ratio in coniferous soils than in hardwood soils. Similarities in soil G+/G− ratios between CONIF-80 and BROAD-Nat forests, however, confirm our hypothesis that the microbial community structure can be restored with long-term succession despite the use of a different vegetation type through the development of an understory. Ample litter from broadleaf tree regrowth in the CONIF-80 forest may have reduced differences in litter quality between CONIF-80 and BROAD-Nat forests. Seasonally, the higher G+/G− ratio in the winter than in the summer is also due to the greater adaption of G+ bacteria to unfavorable conditions. Generally, G− bacteria are more sensitive to changes in soil moisture [41]. Schimel et al. [42] indicated that drought-tolerant microbes, such as G+ bacteria, are inherently protected from low moisture during drought stress.
The ratio of fungi to bacteria increased in coniferous forest soils after the conversion from BROAD-Nat forest (Table 4). Several studies have shown that the microbial community structure responds to soil fertility, with fertile soils favoring bacteria while less fertile soils favor fungi [43,44]. High availability of labile C, for which bacteria are more competitive than fungi, may restrain fungal growth in natural broadleaf forest soil [33]. Greater concentrations of tannins in coniferous forests may also contribute to a higher ratio of fungi to bacteria, as fungi have a higher tannin tolerance [40]. Additionally, fungi can use recalcitrant compounds as C sources [45]. Ushio et al. [7] found the ratio of fungi to bacteria to be significantly higher in coniferous compared to broadleaf soils in tropical mountain areas. In this study, the higher soil fungal content in CONIF-40 than in the BROAD-Nat forest and the similarities in the soil fungal contents between CONIF-80 and the BROAD-Nat forest suggest an evolution of the microbial community that coincides with forest clearing, reforestation, and aging of secondary forest. Thus, forest clearing and reforestation with coniferous species changes the microbial community by increasing soil fungi and decreasing soil bacteria, resulting in a high ratio of fungi to bacteria in the soil. The ratio of soil fungi to bacteria, however, returns to levels similar to that of the native forest system with the long-term (~80 years) growth of secondary forest. Understory broadleaf shrubs and trees that gradually become established over time eventually contribute sufficient litter to balance out the effects of the coniferous litter, favoring the recovery of bacteria.
The 16:1ω5 PLFA peak is an indicator of VAM fungi [46]. The highest soil VAM fungal content was observed in the BROAD-Nat forest in the summer, suggesting that broadleaf plants support mycorrhizal fungi [47]. Priha et al. [48] and Djukic et al. [49] also found higher contents of 16:1ω5 PLFA peak in broadleaf- than in conifer-dominated forest soils. However, one should be careful in using 16:1ω5 PLFA peak as the marker for AM fungi. Olsson [50] indicated this PLFA peak could be also found in some bacteria. Priha et al. [51] noted the 16:1ω5 PLFA peak content may respond to changes in the soil available C. Thus, the high 16:1ω5 content in the BROAD-Nat forest may be due to the high labile soil C in the broadleaf forest.
The PCA of the PLFA content clearly differentiated between the CONIF-40 forest soil and the other two forest soils, largely due to the PC1 axis. The bacterial biomarkers contributed the most to the PC1 score, suggesting that bacterial content is an important factor in determining the microbial community structure of forests in this ecosystem. Our results indicate that the soil microbial community under the CONIF-40 forest was still in a successional phase, while the soil microbial community under the CONIF-80 forest more reached that of the BROAD-Nat forest.

5. Conclusions

Soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities remain lower in secondary coniferous forests than in a natural broadleaf forest even after several decades of vegetation replacement. However, 80 years of growth of a secondary conifer forest led to a soil microbial community structure similar to that under the natural broadleaf forest. We found that the soil microbial community changes along with the growth of coniferous forest in a subtropical region. The conversion of broadleaf to coniferous forests leads to increased ratios of fungi to bacteria and of G+ to G− bacteria. Following the long-term aging of the coniferous plantation, however, bacterial and G− bacterial contents increased, returning the soil microbial community to lower ratios of fungi to bacteria and of G+ to G− bacteria and restoring values similar to those in the native broadleaf forest. The understory broadleaf shrubs and trees established after the reforestation of coniferous plantations may balance out the effects of the coniferous litter, contributing to the recovery of bacteria. Such a mechanism may improve soil restoration after reforestation in subtropical areas.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 104-2621-B-001-005) and by Academia Sinica.

Author Contributions

E.-H.C., T.-H.C., and C.-Y.C. conceived and designed the experiments; E.-H.C. performed the experiments; E.-H.C. and G.T. analyzed the data; C.-K.H. contributed plant inventory; E.-H.C. wrote the original draft; G.T. and C.-Y.C. reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Iovieno, P.; Alfani, A.; Baath, E. Soil microbial community structure and biomass as affected by Pinus pinea plantation in two Mediterranean areas. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2010, 45, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chodak, M.; Niklińska, M. The effect of different tree species on the chemical and microbial properties of the reclaimed mine soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2010, 46, 555–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Samonil, P.; Král, K.; Hort, L. The role of tree uprooting in soil formation: A critical literature review. Geoderma 2010, 157, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Banning, N.C.; Gleeson, D.B.; Grigg, A.H.; Grant, C.D.; Andersen, G.L.; Brodie, E.L.; Murphy, D.V. Soil microbial community successional patterns during forest ecosystem restoration. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 7, 6158–6164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zheng, H.; Ouyang, Z.Y.; Wang, X.K.; Fang, Z.G.; Zhao, T.Q.; Miao, H. Effects of regenerating forest cover on soil microbial communities: A case study in hilly red soil region, Southern China. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 217, 244–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cao, Y.S.; Fu, S.L.; Zou, X.M.; Cao, H.L.; Shao, Y.H.; Zhou, L.X. Soil microbial community composition under Eucalyptus plantations of different age in subtropical China. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2010, 46, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ushio, M.; Wagai, R.; Balser, T.C.; Kitayama, K. Variations in the soil microbial community composition of tropical montane forest ecosystem: Does tree species matter? Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 2699–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Moore-Kucera, J.; Dick, R.P. PLFA profiling of microbial community structure and seasonal shifts in soils of a Douglas-fir chronosequence. Microb. Ecol. 2008, 55, 500–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lou, X.; Cui, X.Y. The study of soil microbial diversity in temperate forest secondary succession process. Chin. J. Soil Sci. 2011, 3, 010. [Google Scholar]
  10. Overby, S.T.; Hart, S.C. Short-term belowground responses to thinning and burning treatments in southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forest of the USA. Forest 2016, 7, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chan, O.C.; Yang, X.; Fu, Y.; Feng, Z.; Sha, L.; Casper, P.; Zou, X. 16S rRNA gene analyses of bacterial community structures in the soils of evergreen broad-leaved forests in south-west China. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2006, 58, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lin, Y.T.; Whitman, W.B.; Coleman, D.C.; Chiu, C.Y. Molecular characterization of soil bacterial community in a perhumid, low mountain forest. Microbe. Environ. 2011, 26, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Weand, M.P.; Arthur, M.A.; Lovett, G.M.; McCulley, R.L.; Weathers, K.C. Effects of tree species and N additions on forest floor microbial communities and extracellular enzyme activities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 2161–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, W.; Shao, Y.; Zou, X.; Liu, T.; Zhou, L.; Wan, S.; Rao, X.; Li, Z.; et al. Invariant community structure of soil bacteria in subtropical coniferous and broadleaved forests. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lin, Y.T.; Jangid, K.; Whitman, W.B.; Coleman, D.C.; Chiu, C.Y. Change in bacterial community structure in response to disturbance of natural hardwood and secondary coniferous forest soils in central Taiwan. Microb. Ecol. 2011, 61, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zelles, L. Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides in the characterization of microbial communities in soil: A review. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1999, 29, 111–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Farrell, M.; Griffith, G.W.; Hobbs, P.J.; Perkins, W.T.; Jones, D.L. Microbial diversity and activity are increased by compost amendment of metal-contaminated soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 71, 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. McLean, E.O. Soil pH and lime requirement. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties; Page, A.L., Ed.; American society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 1982; pp. 199–224. [Google Scholar]
  19. Vance, E.D.; Brookes, P.C.; Jenkinson, D.S. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1987, 19, 703–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, J.; Joergensen, R.G.; Pommerening, B.; Chaussod, R.; Brookes, P.C. Measurement of soil microbial biomass C by fumigation-extraction-an automated procedure. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1990, 22, 1167–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Amato, M.; Ladd, J.N. Assay for microbial biomass based on ninhydrin-reactive nitrogen in extracts of fumigated soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1988, 20, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kandeler, E.; Gerber, H. Short-term assay of soil urease activity using colorimetric determination of ammonium. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1988, 8, 199–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tabatabai, M.A.; Bremner, J.M. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1969, 1, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Schinner, F.; Von Mersi, W. Xylanase-, CM-cellulase- and invertase activity in soil: An improved method. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1990, 22, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Frostegard, A.; Tunlid, A.; Baath, E. Phospholipid fatty acid composition, biomass, and activity of microbial communities from two soil types exposed to different heavy metals. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993, 59, 3605–3617. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Chang, E.H.; Chen, C.T.; Chen, T.H.; Chiu, C.Y. Soil microbial communities and activities in sand dunes of subtropical coastal forests. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2011, 49, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zogg, G.P.; Zak, D.R.; Ringleberg, D.B.; MacDonald, N.W.; Pregitzer, K.S.; White, D.C. Compositional and functional shifts in microbial communities due to soil warming. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1997, 61, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jien, S.H.; Chen, T.H.; Chiu, C.Y. Effects of afforestation on soil organic matter characteristics under subtropical forests with low elevation. J. For. Res. 2011, 16, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Swift, M.J.; Heal, O.W.; Anderson, J.M. Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems; Blackwell Scientific: Oxford, UK, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu, L.; Gundersen, P.; Zhang, T.; Mo, J.M. Effects of phosphorus addition on soil microbial biomass and community composition in three forest types in tropical China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 44, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nannipieri, P.; Muccini, L.; Ciardi, C. Microbial biomass and enzyme activities: Production and persistence. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1983, 15, 679–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Badiane, N.N.Y.; Chotte, J.L.; Pate, E.; Masse, D.; Rouland, C. Use of soil enzyme activities to monitor soil quality in natural and improved fallows in semi-arid tropical regions. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2001, 18, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, Y.S.; Guo, J.F.; Chen, G.S.; Xie, J.S.; Cai, L.P.; Lin, P. Litterfall, nutrient return, and leaf-litter decomposition in four plantations compared with a natural forest in subtropical China. Ann. For. Sci. 2004, 61, 465–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Safari, S.A.A.; Sharifi, Z. Factors affecting cellulase activity in some soils in Hamadan Province, Iran. Iran J. Agric. Sci. 2006, 37, 645–652. [Google Scholar]
  35. MacKenzie, M.D.; Quideau, S.A. Microbial community structure and nutrient availability in oil sands reclaimed boreal soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2010, 44, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kytöviita, M.M.; Pietikäinen, A.; Fritze, H. Soil microbial and plant responses to the absence of plant cover and monoculturing in low arctic meadows. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2011, 48, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zelles, L.; Bai, Q.Y.; Beck, T.; Beese, F. Signature fatty acids in phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides as indicators of microbial biomass and community structure in agricultural soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1992, 24, 317–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bossio, D.A.; Scow, K.M.; Gunapala, N.; Graham, K.J. Determinants of soil microbial communities: Effects of agricultural management, season, and soil type on phospholipid fatty acid profiles. Microb. Ecol. 1998, 36, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kelly, J.J.; Favila, E.; Hundal, L.S.; Marlin, J.C. Assessment of soil microbial communities in surface applied mixtures of Illinois River sediments and biosolids. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2007, 36, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ushio, M.; Kitayama, K.; Balser, T.C. Tree species-mediated spatial patchiness of the composition of microbial community and physicochemical properties in the topsoils of a tropical montane forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 1588–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wilkinson, S.C.; Anderson, J.M.; Scardelis, S.P.; Tisiafouli, M.; Taylor, A.; Wolters, V. PLFA profiles of microbial communities in decomposing conifer litters subject to moisture stress. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2002, 34, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Schimel, J.P.; Balser, T.C.; Wallenstein, M. Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. Ecology 2007, 86, 1386–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Grayston, S.J.; Campbell, C.D.; Bardgett, R.D.; Mawdsley, J.L.; Clegg, C.D.; Ritz, K.; Griffiths, B.S.; Rodwell, J.S.; Edwards, S.J.; Davies, W.J.; et al. Assessing shifts in microbial community structure across a range of grasslands of differing management intensity using CLPP, PLFA and community DNA techniques. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2004, 25, 63–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Grayston, S.J.; Prescott, C.E. Microbial communities in forest floors under four tree species in coastal British Columbia. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2005, 37, 1157–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Scalbert, A. Antimicrobial properties of tannins. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 3875–3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Olsson, P.A.; Baath, E.; Jakobsen, I.; Soderstrom, B. The use of phospholipid and neutral lipid fatty acids to estimate biomass of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil. Mycol. Res. 1995, 99, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kourtev, P.S.; Ehrenfeld, J.G.; Haggblom, M. Experimental analysis of the effect of exotic and native plant species on the structure and function of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2003, 35, 895–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Priha, O.; Grayston, S.J.; Hiukka, R.; Pennanen, T.; Smolander, A. Microbial community structure and characteristics of the organic matter in soils under Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, and Betula pendula at two forest sites. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2001, 33, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Djukic, I.; Zehetner, F.; Mentler, A.; Gerzabek, M.H. Microbial community composition and activity in different Alpine vegetation zones. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Olsson, P.A. Signature fatty acids provide tools for determination of the distribution and interactions of mycorrhizal fungi in soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1999, 29, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Priha, O.; Grayston, S.J.; Pennanen, T.; Smolander, A. Microbial activities related to C and N cycling and microbial community structure in the rhizospheres of Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula pendula seedlings in an organic and mineral soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1999, 30, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Forests 07 00244 g001 550
Figure 1. Photographs of (a) natural broadleaf (BROAD-Nat), (b) 80-year-old coniferous (CONIF-80), and (c) 40-year-old coniferous (CONIF-40) forests at the study site.
Figure 1. Photographs of (a) natural broadleaf (BROAD-Nat), (b) 80-year-old coniferous (CONIF-80), and (c) 40-year-old coniferous (CONIF-40) forests at the study site.
Forests 07 00244 g001
Forests 07 00244 g002 550
Figure 2. Corresponding loading values from the principal component (PC) analysis of the mole % microbial phospholipid fatty acid content in soil samples from three forest types in summer.
Figure 2. Corresponding loading values from the principal component (PC) analysis of the mole % microbial phospholipid fatty acid content in soil samples from three forest types in summer.
Forests 07 00244 g002
Forests 07 00244 g003 550
Figure 3. Plots of the two first principal components (PCs) from the principal component analysis of the mole % microbial phospholipid fatty acid content in soil samples from three forest types in summer.
Figure 3. Plots of the two first principal components (PCs) from the principal component analysis of the mole % microbial phospholipid fatty acid content in soil samples from three forest types in summer.
Forests 07 00244 g003
Forests 07 00244 g004 550
Figure 4. Plots of the two first principal components (PCs) from the principal component analysis of the mole % microbial phospholipid fatty acid content in soil samples from three forest types in winter.
Figure 4. Plots of the two first principal components (PCs) from the principal component analysis of the mole % microbial phospholipid fatty acid content in soil samples from three forest types in winter.
Forests 07 00244 g004
Table
Table 1. Indices of natural broadleaf forest (BROAD-Nat), 80-year-old Calocedrus (CONIF-80) plantation, and 40-year-old Cunninghamia (CONIF-40) plantation at Lienhuachi Experimental Forest.
Table 1. Indices of natural broadleaf forest (BROAD-Nat), 80-year-old Calocedrus (CONIF-80) plantation, and 40-year-old Cunninghamia (CONIF-40) plantation at Lienhuachi Experimental Forest.
Forest typeSpeciesDensity (stems∙ha−1)Plant Height (m)Average DBH 1 (cm)Average Basal Area (m2∙ha−1)Wood Volume (m3∙ha−1)
BROAD-NatCryptocarya chinensis (Hance) Hemsl.25010.915.17.8977.28
Litsea acuminatae (Blume) Kurata17512.514.74.7441.85
Prunus phaeosticta (Hance) Maxim.17513.216.74.6436.20
Lithocarpus amygdalifolius (Skan) Hayata10017.518.53.8433.20
Schefflera octophylla (Lour.) Harms10013.516.82.5616.45
Cinnamomum subavenium Miq. 17513.110.52.4418.44
Cyclobalanopsis pachyloma (O. Seem.) Schott.7510.720.32.4419.17
Styrax suberifolia Hook. & Arn.7516.317.21.9816.44
Pasania harlandii (Hance) Oerst.2516.031.11.9013.75
Machilus zuihoensis Hayata5018.020.41.8516.20
Others2509.59.11.929.35
Total1450 36.20298.3
CONIF-80Calocedrus formosana (Florin) Florin27526.648.051.44644.9
Randia cochinchinensis (Lour.) Merr6258.66.21.957.80
Schefflera octophylla (Lour.) Harms5758.76.21.797.24
Prunus phaeosticta (Hance) Maxim.27510.27.51.265.96
Others3758.05.91.154.39
Total2125 57.59670.3
CONIF-40Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook.90015.821.436.01289.6
Styrax formosana Matsum8010.610.70.794.14
Schefflera octophylla (Lour.) Harms4012.515.10.754.53
Others14012.010.61.628.75
Total1160 39.17307.0
1 DBH: diameter at breast height.
Table
Table 2. Soil chemical and physical properties and microbial biomass in 40-year-old (CONIF-40) and 80-year-old (CONIF-80) coniferous plantations and a natural broadleaf forest (BROAD-Nat) in two seasons.
Table 2. Soil chemical and physical properties and microbial biomass in 40-year-old (CONIF-40) and 80-year-old (CONIF-80) coniferous plantations and a natural broadleaf forest (BROAD-Nat) in two seasons.
Season Forest TypeSoil Moisture (%)pHCorg 1 (%)Ntot (%)Cmic (mg∙kg−1)Nmic (mg∙kg−1)Cmic/Corg (%)Nmic/Ntot (%)
SummerBROAD-Nat27.6 a 23.78 b3.45 b0.29 ab1668 a140 a4.83 a4.82 b
CONIF-8023.1 b3.74 b3.23 bc0.24 bc1314 b94.5 c4.21 a3.93 c
CONIF-4029.2 a3.62 c4.45 a0.31 a1229 b116 b2.82 b3.74 c
WinterBROAD-Nat19.3 c3.87 a2.62 c0.22 c763 c119 b2.92 b5.40 a
CONIF-8021.9 c3.87 a3.31 bc0.25 bc748 c121 ab2.28 c4.84 b
CONIF-4027.3 a3.75 b3.79 b0.29 ab812 c117 b2.16 c3.98 c
ANOVA results 3
Forest type**********************
Sample season******ns****ns******
Forest × season***nsns*******nsns
1 Corg: soil organic C, Ntot: soil total N, Cmic: microbial biomass C, Nmic: microbial biomass N; 2 Values in each column followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different at p < 0.05, based on Duncan’s multiple test; 3 * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns: not significant.
Table
Table 3. Soil enzymatic activities in 40-year-old (CONIF-40) and 80-year-old (CONIF-80) coniferous forest plantations and a natural broadleaf forest (BROAD-Nat) in two seasons.
Table 3. Soil enzymatic activities in 40-year-old (CONIF-40) and 80-year-old (CONIF-80) coniferous forest plantations and a natural broadleaf forest (BROAD-Nat) in two seasons.
SeasonForest TypeCellulase (µg glucose g−1∙h−1)Xylanase (µg glucose g−1∙h−1)Urease (mmol NH4+-N g−1∙h−1)Acid Phosphatase (µg nitrophenol g−1∙h−1)
SummerBROAD-Nat31.7 c 165.8 d10.6 a569 b
CONIF-8063.8 bc70.8 cd11.9 a628 b
CONIF-40126 a109 ab9.47 ab850 a
WinterBROAD-Nat 36.7 bc116 a5.83 b338 c
CONIF-8046.7 bc92.1 bc9.84 ab318 c
CONIF-4076.2 b118 a6.45 b361 c
ANOVA results
Forest type****ns
Sample Seasonns********
Forest × seasonnsnsNsns
1 Values in each column followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different at p < 0.05, based on Duncan’s multiple test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns: not significant.
Table
Table 4. Contents of phospholipid acid biomarkers (nmol∙g−1 soil) and biomarker content ratios in 40-year-old (CONIF-40) and 80-year-old (CONIF-80) coniferous forest plantations and a natural broadleaf forest (BROAD-Nat) in two seasons.
Table 4. Contents of phospholipid acid biomarkers (nmol∙g−1 soil) and biomarker content ratios in 40-year-old (CONIF-40) and 80-year-old (CONIF-80) coniferous forest plantations and a natural broadleaf forest (BROAD-Nat) in two seasons.
SeasonForest TypeTotal PLFA 1BacteriaFungiVAM FungiActino-mycetesG+G−G+/G−Fungi/ Bacteria
SummerBROAD-Nat115 a 250.4 a1.92 a2.59 a3.53 a23.4 a34.1 a0.69 c0.038 b
CONIF-8080.7 b34.5 b1.63 a1.68 b1.99 b16.6 b23.4 b0.71 c0.047 ab
CONIF-4071.5 bc29.8 b1.59 a1.38 b1.80 b17.0 b16.4 c1.16 b0.052 a
WinterBROAD-Nat50.7 d12.5 c0.270 b0.611 c0.781 c6.92 d5.24 d1.32 ab0.021 c
CONIF-8058.7 d17.4 c0.420 b0.650 c0.790 c9.80 c7.14 d1.37 ab0.024 c
CONIF-4064.1 d18.4 c0.701 b0.705 c0.777 c10.7 c7.02 d1.53 a0.038 b
ANOVA results 3
Forest type**ns**************
Sampling season***************************
Forest × season****ns************nsns
1 PLFA: phospholipid fatty acids, VAM: vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal, G+: gram-positive bacteria, G−: gram-negative bacteria; 2 Values in each column followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different at p < 0.05, based on Duncan’s multiple test; 3 * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns: not significant.
Table
Table 5. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between soil properties and microbial variables.
Table 5. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between soil properties and microbial variables.
Soil PropertiesCellulaseXylanaseUreasePhosphataseTotal PLFAG+G−G+/G− FungiVAM FungiFungi/ Bacteria
C0.643 ***0.2920.3660.454 *0.3200.3760.177−0.0500.1320.1860.159
N0.476 **0.1180.406 *0.394 *0.464 *0.498 **0.325−0.0500.1320.3390.206
Cmic−0.039−0.606 ***0.503 **0.619 ***0.895 ***0.917 ***0.964 ***−0.902 ***−0.651 ***0.952 ***0.888 ***
Cmic/Corg−0.365−0.753 **0.2680.3630.711 ***0.711 ***0.843 ***−0.884 ***−0.672 ***0.821 ***0.776 ***
Cmic/Nmic0.112−0.584 **0.459 *0.676 ***0.665 ***0.743 ***0.819 ***−0.889 ***0.670 ***0.779 ***0.919 ***
pH−0.678 ***−0.148−0.273−0.682 ***−0.419 *−0.513 **−0.381 *0.2470.202−0.389 *−0.492 **
Moisture0.428 *−0.0390.2910.529 **0.637 ***0.680 **0.529 **−0.252−0.0230.556 **0.440 *
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, E.-H.; Chen, T.-H.; Tian, G.-l.; Hsu, C.-K.; Chiu, C.-Y. Effect of 40 and 80 Years of Conifer Regrowth on Soil Microbial Activities and Community Structure in Subtropical Low Mountain Forests. Forests 2016, 7, 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7100244

AMA Style

Chang E-H, Chen T-H, Tian G-l, Hsu C-K, Chiu C-Y. Effect of 40 and 80 Years of Conifer Regrowth on Soil Microbial Activities and Community Structure in Subtropical Low Mountain Forests. Forests. 2016; 7(10):244. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7100244

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Ed-Haun, Tsai-Huei Chen, Guang-long Tian, Chun-Kai Hsu, and Chih-Yu Chiu. 2016. "Effect of 40 and 80 Years of Conifer Regrowth on Soil Microbial Activities and Community Structure in Subtropical Low Mountain Forests" Forests 7, no. 10: 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7100244

APA Style

Chang, E. -H., Chen, T. -H., Tian, G. -l., Hsu, C. -K., & Chiu, C. -Y. (2016). Effect of 40 and 80 Years of Conifer Regrowth on Soil Microbial Activities and Community Structure in Subtropical Low Mountain Forests. Forests, 7(10), 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7100244

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop