1. Introduction
Ovarian cancer, known as the “silent killer”, has the highest mortality rate of all gynecological tumors [
1], and over 90% of ovarian cancers are epithelial carcinomas [
2]. More than 60% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed in the late stages, due to the lack of clinical manifestations in the early stages [
3,
4]. Ovarian cancer originates from the ovarian surface epithelial cells or the fallopian tube secretory epithelial cells and malignant cells can spread directly to the peritoneum, resulting in metastasis and poor treatment outcomes [
5]. Improvements in ovarian cancer treatments are urgently needed. Current research is focused on accurately targeting cancer cells and enhancing the efficacy of therapeutic drugs while reducing side effects. Chemotherapy remains the most important treatment modality for ovarian cancer. At present, the first-line chemotherapy drug for ovarian cancer is platinum plus paclitaxel, but due to the resistance and high recurrence rate of platinum plus paclitaxel, many patients cannot receive effective treatment [
6]. Perhaps choosing different types of chemotherapy and chemotherapy administration methods can improve treatment efficacy and reduce patient recurrence and mortality rates [
7]. However, many chemotherapy drugs have poor molecular water solubility, short circulating half-life, and severe cytotoxicity to healthy organs, which limits their clinical application.
SN38 (7-ethyl-10-hydroxythectothecin) is an active metabolite of irinotecan (CPT-11) and a derivative of camptothecin obtained through chemical structure modification. It has a strong anti-tumor effect and high anti-tumor activity [
8]. The biological activity of SN38 is 100–1000 times that of irinotecan for some tumor cell lines [
9]. However, due to the relatively high hydrophobicity and instability at physiological pH, clinical use of SN38 is limited currently [
10]. Recently, a variety of drug delivery strategies have been developed to overcome the shortcomings of SN38. Many attempts have been made to develop intravenous or oral preparations of SN38 with better anti-tumor effects. Liposomes are small spherical vesicles derived from naturally occurring non-toxic phospholipids and are biodegradable nanosystems, which have been extensively utilized as drug delivery systems. Onivyde (Irinotecan liposome injection), a pioneer in the development of liposomes loaded with camptothecin and its derivatives, is used to treat patients with tumors. Although SN38-based chemotherapy improved the efficacy of ovarian cancer treatment, drug resistance develops in cancer cells and serious side effects occur. To overcome the inherent limitations of single chemotherapy drugs, chemotherapy has been combined with phototherapy induced by photosensitizers as a practical clinical cancer treatment platform.
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) combined with chemotherapy is an emerging field of chemical phototherapy that has emerged as a promising strategy to improve the efficacy of chemotherapy drugs in the treatment of cancer cells [
11]. PDT can efficiently convert near-infrared light (NIR) into heat and produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), causing damage to intracellular components and leading to cell death. In addition, PDT generates heat in the near-infrared, thereby enhancing the efficiency of chemotherapy drug uptake by increasing the permeability of cancer cell membranes [
11]. Indocyanine green (IR820) is a clinical infrared fluorescent dye that efficiently absorbs laser light for photothermal and PDT. IR820 is non-toxic until exposed to laser irradiation. The limitations of IR820 include rapid clearance (blood half-life of 2–4 min) and low cellular uptake. These limitations restrict the diagnostic and treatment applications of IR820. Enhancing the intracellular release of chemotherapeutic drugs during the PDT process is essential to amplifying the synergistic therapeutic effects of chemo-photodynamic therapy.
Due to the different specific markers expressed on the surface of tumor cells and normal cells, peptides and antibody ligands that can bind to tumor specific markers are combined with nanocarriers to deliver anti-tumor drugs, achieving tumor specific drug delivery [
10]. The active targeting moieties specifically bind to the target molecules on the surface of the drug or its carrier, enabling the drug to be targeted to specific tissues or organs, achieving active targeting. Active targeting strategy can avoid the role of mononuclear phagocytosis system and maximize drug accumulation at the target site, thereby improving the anti-tumor efficacy of drugs [
12]. The follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR), characterized by a G protein-coupled receptor structure comprising seven transmembrane domains, is located on the cell surfaces of reproductive organs such as the ovaries, testes, and other related tissues [
13,
14]. The follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is a heterodimeric glycoprotein composed of non-covalently bound α and β subunits [
15]. The α subunit is encoded by a single gene shared by FSH, the luteinizing hormone (LH), the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH). The β subunit is specific to FSH. The association of FSH β with the FSHR in the cell membrane affects target cells, such as granulosa cells and Sertoli cells. FSHβ 33–53 and FSHβ 81–95 peptides promote paclitaxel-loaded NP entry into the FSH receptor (FSHR)-positive ovarian tissue to achieve excellent anti-tumor effects [
16]. Thus, targeting therapy mediated by FSHR has a high potential for ovarian cancer treatment [
13,
15].
We developed an ovarian cancer-targeting drug delivery system based on the FSHβ (33–53) peptide. The lipophilic chemotherapeutic drug SN38 and the photosensitizer IR820 were loaded into the phospholipid bilayer of the liposomes. IR820 converts NIR into heat and produces ROS. It not only causes damage to intracellular components, leading to cell death, but also enhances the sensitivity of tumors to chemotherapy drugs. These effects induce the release and uptake of chemotherapy drugs and increase sensitivity to chemotherapy drugs in ovarian cancer cells, as illustrated in
Figure 1. Chemotherapy and phototherapy act synergistically, and this dual-delivery liposome may be a promising strategy for tumor treatment.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
SN38 was procured from Dalian Meilun Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Dalian, China). The FSH β (FSH) peptide (YTRDLVYKDPARPKIQKTCTF) was custom-synthesized by Nanjing TGpeptide Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). New indocyanine green (IR820) and Coumarin-6 (98%) were obtained from J&K Scientific Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). DSPE-PEG2000, DSPE-PEG2000-Mal, 2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC), and cholesterol were purchased from AVT (Shanghai, China) Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) was obtained from Dojindo Laboratories (Kumamoto, Japan). The Fluorescein Isothiocyanate (FITC)-Annexin V/Propidium Iodide (PI) apoptosis detection kit was acquired from Beyotime Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The ROS Detection Kit was purchased from Enzo Life Sciences Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The Calcineurin-AM/PI Staining Kit and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) were purchased from Solarbio Life Sciences Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The 1,1-dioctadecyltetramethyl indotricarbocyanine iodide (DIR) was obtained from Biotium Inc. (Hayward, CA, USA). Chloroform and methanol (HPLC grade) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St Louis, MO, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from GIBCO LLC. (Grand Island, NY, USA). RPMI 1640 medium, DMEM medium, and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).
2.2. Cells and Animals
High FSHR-expressing mouse A2780 cells and low FSHR-expressing HepG2 and C26 cells were purchased from the Department of Pathology at Peking Union Medical College Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology. A2780 cells and C26 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% FBS at 37 °C and 5% CO2. HepG2 cells were cultured in DMEM media with 10% FBS at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere. All experiments were performed in cells at the logarithmic growth stage.
Female BALB/c Nude mice (initial weight 18–20 g) were sourced from Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) and were cared for under suitable conditions. All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the guidelines established and approved by the Laboratory Animal Ethics Committee of the Institute of Materia Medica in the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College.
2.3. DSPE-PEG2000-FSH Synthesis and Characterization
The synthesis of DSPE-PEG
2000-FSH was based on the method by Hong et al. [
16] with slight modifications. The FSH-Cys cysteine residue was coupled to DSPE-PEG
2000-MAL to make DSPE-PEG
2000-FSH. FSH-Cys and DSPE-PEG
2000-MAL (molar ratio 1:1) were dissolved in a HEPES buffer at pH 8.0, and nitrogen was stirred at room temperature for 48 h. The reaction was conducted in dialysis bags in water. The unreacted FSH peptide was removed by aeration in water through a dialysis bag (MWCO: 2500) for 48 h. The final product was obtained by freeze-drying. The synthesis of DSPE-PEG
2000-FSH was validated through
1H-NMR (400 MHz, Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) (4800 Plus, Applied Biosystems Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).
2.4. Liposome Preparation with or without FSH Peptide Modification
SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH liposomes were prepared by thin-film hydration method. After dissolving DOPC, cholesterol, DSPE-PEG2000, DSPE-PEG2000-FSH, SN38, and IR820 in chloroform, the organic solvents were removed by rotary evaporation at 37 °C. The lipid membranes were hydrated with deionized water under spinning for 30 min. The whole mixture was sonicated at 65 W for 10 min with 2 s of sonication and 2 s of a break in an ice bath using an ultrasonic cell pulverizer (Scientz 950E; Ningbo Scientz Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Ningbo, China). The unbound SN38 and IR820 were removed by filtration through a 0.22 μm nitrocellulose membrane. Samples were stored at 4 °C. Blank-Lipo, SN38-Lipo@FSH, IR820-Lipo@FSH, and SN38/IR820-Lipo (without FSH peptide) were prepared using the same method.
2.5. Characterization of the Liposomes
The average particle size, polydispersity index, and zeta potential of SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH were measured using dynamic light scattering (DLS) and electrophoretic light scattering (Zetasizer Nano ZS90, Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). The structure and morphology were examined using transmission electron microscopy (JEM-1400PLUS, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The SN38 and IR820 concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Agilent 1200 infinity; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and UV-VIS spectrophotometry (TU-1810, Pulse Analyzer General Instrument Ltd., Beijing, China), respectively. The detection wavelength of SN38 was 265 nm, and methanol:water (70:30) was used as the mobile phase. Free SN38 and IR820 were separated from the liposomes using minicolumn centrifugation [
17]. The entrapment efficiency (EE%) was calculated as follows:
To determine the stability of SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH, the prepared solution was stored at 4 °C for 7 days in PBS or PBS containing 50% of serum. The color, transparency, particle size, zeta potential, and PDI of SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH were recorded during the days.
The in vitro release of drugs from SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH in a simulated physiological environment was evaluated using dialysis. SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH solution (0.5 mL) was placed in a dialysis bag (MW: 10 kDa; MYM Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Hyderabad, India), and the dialysis bag was immersed in 10 mL of PBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.5% (v/v) Tween 80. The dialysis solution was stirred at 100 rpm for 72 h at 37 °C, and 0.5 mL aliquots were removed at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h. The aliquot volume was replaced with fresh medium. The SN38 and IR820 concentrations in the samples were determined using HPLC and UV-VIS spectrophotometry, respectively. The cumulative release of SN38 and IR820 over time was calculated.
2.6. Interaction of SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH with FSHR In Vitro
Since ovarian cancer cells are highly expressed with FSHR, we investigated the interaction between the FSH target peptide in SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH and the FSHR on the surface of A2780 ovarian cancer cells. SN38/IR820-Lipo and SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH were introduced to A2780 cells and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h to assess their binding to the FSHR. Following incubation, cells were rinsed with PBS and lysed using lysis buffer. The cell lysates were incubated for 30 min at 4 °C and then centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000×
g. Subsequently, the protein lysates were separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with AC-TIN (GB12001, Servicebio, Beijing, China) and FSHR antibodies (1:1000; 2808s, Cell Signaling, Shanghai, China). Following washing, the membranes were incubated with goat anti-rat IgG antibody for 1 h, and observed using a chemiluminescence (ImageQuant LAS 4000 mini, Fuji, Japan) [
7,
9,
10,
11,
18].
2.7. Cellular Uptake Analysis
As a drug delivery system, the efficiency of liposome internalization by target cells is crucial [
19]. Cou-6, a fluorescent probe and laser dye, was used to track liposome uptake [
20]. Cou-6-labeled liposomes with or without FSH modifications (Cou-6-Lipo and Cou-6-Lipo@FSH) were prepared. A2780 cells, HepG2 cells, and C26 cells (1.5 × 10
5 cells/well) were seeded on circular glass slides in 12-well plates. After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, the cells were treated with free Cou-6, Cou-6-Lipo, or Cou-6-Lipo@FSH (Cou-6, 5 µg/mL) for 4 h. After washing three times with the cold PBS buffer, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Cells were stained with DAPI to visualize the cell nuclei. Finally, cells were imaged with a confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss LSM 710; Carl Zeiss Microscope, Jena, Germany).
The uptake efficiencies of Free Cou-6, Cou-6-Lipo, and Cou-6-Lipo@FSH in A2780 cells were quantified using a flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). A2780 cells were seeded in 12-well plates (1.5 × 105 cells/well). After 24 h, the cells were exposed to free Cou-6, Cou-6-Lipo, or Cou-6-Lipo@FSH (Cou-6, 1 µg/mL) in a serum-free culture medium at 37 °C for 4 h. Subsequently, cells were washed with PBS, and the fluorescence intensity of the cells was measured using flow cytometry.
2.8. ROS Generation
To measure ROS production, A2780 cells (1.5 × 105 cells/well) were seeded into 12-well plates and cultured for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. After washing three times with cold PBS, the cells were treated with Blank-Lipo, SN38-Lipo@FSH, IR820-Lipo@FSH, SN38/IR820-Lipo, SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH (SN38: 1 µg/mL; IR820: 1 µg/mL), or physiological saline (control) for 4 h. The cells were treated with 1 mL of the ROS detection probe DCFH-DA (25 μM) and incubated for 10 min. The photic group was exposed to 5 min of 808 nm laser irradiation (0.5 W/cm2). Cells were treated following the kit instructions, and the fluorescence resulting from ROS production was observed using an inverted fluorescence microscope (CKX41, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
2.9. Cell Apoptosis Assay
Cell apoptosis was qualitatively evaluated using Calcein-AM/PI staining. A2780 cells were seeded into 12-well plates and incubated for 24 h. Cells were treated with Blank-Lipo, SN38-Lipo@FSH, IR820-Lipo@FSH, SN38/IR820-Lipo, or SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH (SN38 and IR820 both 1 μg/mL) diluted in fresh culture medium. After 4 h of treatment, the cells were irradiated for 3 min (808 nm, 0.5 W/cm2). After 24 h, Calcein-AM/PI live/dead cell staining was performed and photographed.
The apoptosis rate of A2780 cells was quantified using an Annexin V-FITC/PI apoptosis detection kit. A2780 cells (1.5 × 105 cells/well) were inoculated in 6-well plates and cultured for 24 h. Cells were treated as previously described, and irradiated for 3 min using an 808 nm laser (0.5 W/cm2). After 24 h, the cells were treated with 0.25% EDTA-free trypsin. Annexin V-FITC/PI apoptosis detection was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were immediately analyzed using flow cytometry.
2.10. Wound Healing Assay
The migratory capacity of tumor cells following treatment with various liposomes was assessed. A2780 cells were seeded in 12-well plates and cultured until a monolayer was formed. After the scratch, the cells were treated with free Blank-Lipo, SN38-Lipo@FSH, IR820-Lipo@FSH (Laser +), SN38/IR820-Lipo (Laser +), or SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH (Laser +) (with both SN38 and IR820 at 0.2 μg/mL). Fresh medium was used as a control. After 24 h, migration of cells in the wound was observed using an inverted microscope. (Olympus, Hamburg, Germany).
2.11. Cell Viability Assay
The cytotoxic effects of the blank vectors on A2780 cells were measured using the CCK-8 assay. A2780 cells (4 × 103 cells/well) were seeded in a 96-well plates. After 24 h, the cells were treated with 0.001–50 μg/mL Blank-Lipo in fresh media for 24 or 48 h. After replacing the micelle with CCK-8 solution, the cells were incubated for 3 h at 37 °C. The optical density was measured at 450 nm using a Synergy H1 Microplate Reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). Cells treated with culture media only were used as the control. Each group consisted of three parallel samples.
The inhibitory effects of Free SN38, SN38-Lipo@FSH, Free IR820, IR820-Lipo@FSH, SN38/IR820-Lipo and SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH on A2780 cell proliferation were determined using the CCK-8 assay. A2780 cells (4 × 10
3 cells/well) were seeded into 96-well plates. After 24 h, cells were treated with Free SN38, SN38-Lipo@FSH, Free IR820, IR820-Lipo@FSH, SN38/IR820-Lipo and SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH (SN38: 1 µg/mL; IR820: 1 µg/mL), then the photic group was exposed to 5 min of 808 nm laser irradiation (0.5 W/cm
2). The control group was included in the analysis. Cells were irradiated with an 808 nm laser (0.5 W/cm
2) for 3 min per well, and the cells were incubated at 37 °C for another 24 or 48 h. CCK-8 reagent was added to each well, and the optical density was measured at 450 nm. Cell viability (%) was calculated as follows:
2.12. In Vivo Imaging
BALB/c Nude mice were injected in the right flank with 200 μL of A2780 cells (1 × 108 cells/mL). Mice were randomly divided into three groups (n = 3/group) when the tumor volumes reached 100 mm3. Free DIR, DIR-loaded liposomes (DIR-Lipo), or DIR-loaded liposomes with FSH (DIR-Lipo@FSH) were injected intravenously at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg of DIR. Mice were anesthetized and imaged 1, 4, 8, and 24 h after injection (Caliper Life Sciences Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA). Hearts, livers, spleens, lungs, kidneys, and tumor tissues were collected from the mice 24 h after injection, and analyzed using Living Image software (Version 4.3.1; Caliper Life Sciences Inc.).
2.13. In Vivo US-Induced ROS Generation
To evaluate US-induced ROS generation at the tumor sites, the tumor-bearing BALB/c nude mice (n = 3/group) were intravenously injected with PBS, Free IR820, SN38/IR820-Lipo, and SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH (IR820 dose of 10 mg/kg). After 24 h, the mice were anesthetized with chloralic hydras and injected with 50 µg DCFH-DA intra-tumorally. After 10 min, the tumor sites of the mice were irradiated (808 nm, 0.5 W/cm2) for 10 min and then, the mice were sacrificed. The collected tumors were flash frozen and observed by CLSM.
2.14. Anti-Tumor Efficacy and Safety Assessment
The tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided into six groups (n = 4/group). Blank-Lipo, SN38-Lipo@FSH, IR820-Lipo@FSH, SN38/IR820-Lipo, SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH (SN38, 10 mg/kg; IR820, 10 mg/kg), or saline (negative control) were injected intravenously. All animals were given the drug via the tail vein every 4 days for a total of 5 doses. Mice in the SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH group were subjected to 808 nm laser irradiation (0.5 W/cm2) for 10 min on the second day after the injection. The irradiation treatment was repeated once every three days for a total of five treatments. Body weights and tumor dimensions (measured with a caliper) were recorded after each treatment.
Three days after the final treatment, mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation after blood collection from the orbital sinus. The main organs were taken for HE staining, and the tumor tissues were taken for HE and TUNEL testing to examine the cellular apoptosis in the tumor tissues. Lung tissues were fixed in Bouin’s solution for 24 h and immersed in 50% ethanol for 2 h to detect tumor lung metastases. Blood samples were collected to measure blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, aspartate transaminase, and alanine transaminase levels.
2.15. Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as the means ± standard deviations. GraphPad Prism software 8.0.2 was used for data analysis. Groups were compared using two-tailed Student’s t-tests or one-way analysis of variance. Differences between groups were considered statistically significant at * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
4. Discussion
Ovarian cancer is a highly malignant epithelial cell tumor that lacks typical clinical manifestations. Therefore, by the time of diagnosis, the tumor has reached a level that is difficult to treat, bringing enormous life and psychological pressure to patients. In this study, SN38 and IR820 were co-loaded into liposomes and surface modified with FSH peptides with an ovarian cancer active targeting function, resulting in ovarian cancer active targeting. After intravenous injection through the tail vein, the liposome circulates in the blood and selectively targets the site of ovarian cancer tumors, providing more precise therapeutic effects and minimizing side effects on other tissues.
SN38 is an active metabolite of the first-line drug irinotecan, with strong anti-tumor effects. However, due to the limited water solubility, unstable properties, drug resistance, and adverse reactions of SN38, its widespread clinical application is limited [
22]. Nano-delivery system can increase the solubility of SN38, reduce its toxic side effects on normal tissues, and improve anti-tumor efficacy. In addition, combining PDT with chemotherapy to improve the sensitivity and anti-tumor efficacy of chemotherapy drugs is a promising application strategy [
23]. Therefore, in this study, we simultaneously encapsulated SN38 and IR820 in liposomes to enhance the anti-tumor activity of these two drugs and effectively deliver them to the tumor tissues.
The ability of liposomes to accurately reach the tumor site and successfully release drugs is the key to exert its cytotoxic effect. DSPE-PEG
2000 is a safe and widely used phospholipid polymer in the field of drug delivery, with biocompatibility, biodegradability, and amphiphilicity [
24]. DSPE-PEG
2000-FSH fabricated liposomes can target ovarian cancer cells overexpressed with FSHR receptors. This strategy increases cellular uptake of the drugs, reduces damage to normal cells, and achieves more effective and precise treatment. The experimental results showed that compared with non-targeted liposome, FSH-modified liposome exhibited enhanced cellular uptake and reduced systemic side effects. After PDT irradiation, IR820 produces ROS, enhancing the sensitivity of tumors to chemotherapy drugs, thereby promoting tumor cell apoptosis and improving anti-tumor efficacy. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH significantly inhibits the growth of A2780 ovarian cancer cells. H&E and TUNEL experimental results of tumor tissue showed that SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH group efficiently induced cell apoptosis and necrosis. Importantly, there is no significant damage to other organs, indicating SN38/IR820-Lipo@FSH is expected to become a safe and effective new type of anti-ovarian cancer treatment.