Next Article in Journal
Development of a Versatile Nanostructured Lipid Carrier (NLC) Using Design of Experiments (DoE)—Part II: Incorporation and Stability of Butamben with Different Surfactants
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Cyclodextrin-Based Mono and Dual Encapsulated Powders by Spray Drying for Successful Preservation of Everlasting Flower Extract
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceutics
Volume 16
Issue 7
10.3390/pharmaceutics16070862
pharmaceutics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Histological Assessment of Respiratory Tract and Liver of BALB/c Mice Nebulized with Tocilizumab

by
Paloma Jimena de Andres
1,
Sergio Ferreiro
2,
Angela Flores
3,
Almudena Garcia
3 and
Cesar Henriquez-Camacho
4,5,*
1
Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria de la, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2
Unidad de Veterinaria, Radiodiagnóstico y Cirugía Experimental del, Centro de Apoyo Tecnológico de la, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud de la, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcon, Spain
3
Servicio de Farmacia del Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, 28993 Mostoles, Spain
4
Servicio de Medicina Interna del Hospital Universitario de Móstoles, 28935 Mostoles, Spain
5
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcon, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2024, 16(7), 862; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16070862
Submission received: 25 May 2024 / Revised: 12 June 2024 / Accepted: 25 June 2024 / Published: 27 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Pharmacy and Formulation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pulmonary drug delivery offers a minimally invasive and efficient method for treating lung conditions, leveraging the lungs’ extensive surface area and blood flow for rapid drug absorption. Nebulized therapies aim to deliver drugs directly to the lung tissue. This study investigates the histological impact of nebulized tocilizumab—a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-6, traditionally administered intravenously for rheumatoid arthritis and severe COVID-19—on a murine model. Thirty BALB/c mice were nebulized with tocilizumab (10 mg, 5 mg, and 2.5 mg) and six controls were nebulized with saline solution. They were euthanized 48 h later, and their organs (lungs, nasal mucosa, and liver) were analyzed by a microscopic histological evaluation. The results indicate that all the mice survived the 48 h post-nebulization period without systemic compromise. The macroscopic examination showed no abnormalities, and the histopathological analysis revealed greater lung vascular changes in the control group than in the nebulized animals, which is attributable to the euthanasia with carbon dioxide. Additionally, increased alveolar macrophages were observed in the nebulized groups compared to controls. No significant histological changes were observed in the liver, indicating the safety of nebulized tocilizumab. In conclusion, these findings suggest the potential of nebulized tocilizumab for treating pulmonary inflammation, warranting further research to establish its efficacy and safety in clinical settings.

1. Introduction

Pulmonary drug delivery is gaining increasing attention as a minimally invasive and appealing approach to treat numerous medical conditions, particularly those affecting the lungs [1]. Due to the extensive surface area of and abundant blood flow in the lungs, drugs are absorbed more rapidly, leading to enhanced therapeutic effectiveness and a reduced occurrence of side effects [2]. Nebulized lung therapies have been tested in different settings with the purpose of directly reaching the lung tissue to avoid the side effects that occur when systemic treatments, i.e., antibiotics, immunosuppressive drugs, antifungal, etc., are used [3].
Tocilizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks the interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor [4]. It is approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic juvenile arthritis [5,6,7]. Tocilizumab has also been used in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and resulting in severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) [8]. Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is the most severe complication in patients with severe COVID-19, and inflammatory complications have been associated with a cytokine release syndrome with high mortality [9,10]. For patients with elevated inflammatory markers and pro-inflammatory cytokines, intravenous corticosteroids, baricitinib, and tocilizumab have been used extensively in moderate/severe COVID-19 cases because of its mortality benefit [11,12,13]. The heightened risk of overwhelming infections (bacterial, fungal, and parasitic) is a potential adverse effect of anti-inflammatory treatments [14,15,16]. Minimizing systemic exposure and secondary side effects are critical.
The only route of tocilizumab administration that has been tested in clinical trials for use in humans is intravenous. Apart from inhaled interferon beta-1a [17] and corticosteroids, which have demonstrated positive effects in reducing hospital admissions, mortality rates, and resolving all initial symptoms [18], nebulized treatments for COVID-19 or other inflammatory lung diseases have not undergone testing. Even when intravenous drugs (steroids or tocilizumab) are used during a cytokine storm, some patients develop Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) with severe lung damage and, consequently, require Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission for ventilatory assistance [19]. It is necessary to identify new formulations or different approaches to minimize lung damage and sequelae in different scenarios with lung inflammation.
There are no animal models demonstrating the effects of nebulized tocilizumab. The utilization of nebulized monoclonal antibodies targeting interleukin in pulmonary inflammatory ailments lacks empirical data, though numerous inhaled antibodies are currently undergoing initial clinical trials for managing SARS-CoV-2 infection and asthma/COPD [20].
The objective of this study was to observe the histological changes in the respiratory tract and liver of a murine model following treatment with nebulized tocilizumab (liquid formulation developed for intravenous delivery). To that end, a histological study of various organs, including the nasal mucosa, trachea, lungs, and liver, was conducted on the nebulized mice exposed to different doses of tocilizumab.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

BALB/c mice (9 weeks old) were kept in the animal facility at 20–24 °C, 45–55% humidity, and a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle with food and tap water ad libitum. They were housed in clean-air, viral- and antigen-free facilities with restricted access in the Veterinary Unit at Rey Juan Carlos University. The mice were allowed to acclimate for one week prior to use, and they were used in accordance with an approved protocol. This study was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Rey Juan Carlos University (PROEX 171.4/21).
The animals were “whole body” exposed to nebulized tocilizumab or a vehicle (saline) only. During nebulization, the animals were placed in a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) chamber (Emka technologies SAS) of 396 cm3 with a filter on the top, which was linked to a 17 cm long, nontoxic, corrugated PVC tube, which was attached to the nebulizer (Intersurgical 1453015), with 4 liters per minute of oxygen as the air-jet nebulizer. To avoid contamination of the control group, their nebulization was performed on separate days (Figure 1). The experimental dose determination was reached after a pilot test that included three different doses per mouse (10 mg, 5 mg, and 2.5 mg) of a 20 mg/mL concentration of tocilizumab (Roamctera-Roche Pharma), with sufficient time for complete solution nebulization (mean of 15–20 min). The nebulization was stopped when no solution was observed in the cap of the nebulizer. A control group (3 males and 3 females) exposed to saline (5 mL 0.9% NaCl) and three study groups (5 males and 5 females) were established as follows:
  • Control group: 6 control mice exposed to saline (5 mL of saline solution, 0.9% NaCl);
  • Group 1: 10 mice exposed to nebulized tocilizumab (2.5 mg in a volume of 5 mL completed with saline) and euthanized after 48 h;
  • Group 2: 10 mice exposed to nebulized tocilizumab (5 mg; 5 mL final volume) and euthanized after 48 h;
  • Group 3: 10 mice exposed to nebulized tocilizumab (10 mg; 5 mL final volume) and euthanized after 48 h.
Mortality was assessed at 24 and 48 h. If the mice did not die within this time frame, they were euthanized with carbon dioxide (CO2), and the organs (lungs, nasal mucosa, and liver) were fixed in 4% buffered paraformaldehyde solution and submitted to a veterinary pathologist (PJdA) who was blinded to the treatment group assignment. The organs were paraffin-embedded, and a single 5 µm section from each sample was acquired and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) for microscopic histological evaluation.

2.2. Histopathological Evaluation

The stained slides were evaluated in order to describe the histopathological characteristics. The histological changes evaluated in the respiratory tract were as follows: vacuolization of the epithelial cells, presence of bronchiole detritus, increased height of the bronchiolar epithelium, perivascular infiltration, intra-alveolar macrophage infiltration, thickening of the alveolar septa, observation of intra-alveolar fibrin, intra-alveolar edema, congestion, hemorrhage, and platelet aggregation. The histopathological changes evaluated in the liver samples were the presence of hepatocyte degeneration/necrosis, perivascular inflammation, and focal parenchymatous inflammation.
Each of these changes was semiquantitatively categorized as follows: 0 (absence), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe). In addition, a total score for the changes observed in the respiratory tract and liver was established for each animal. Each animal was then categorized based on the histopathological changes observed, and three categories were established as follows: 0 (no histological changes), 1 (score between 1 and 3), 2 (score between 4 and 6), and 3 (score higher than 6).

2.3. Statistical Study

The analyses were performed using SPSS 19, and a conventional p < 0.05 level was used to define statistical significance.
For the statistical analysis, four groups of animals were compared as follows: the control, group 1, group 2, and group 3. All the histopathological changes were categorical variables with four categories each: absence, mild, moderate, and severe. Similarly, the animal scoring was a categorical variable with four categories: 0, 1, 2, and 3. A Pearson chi-squared statistical analysis was used to test the association among the different categorical variables within the groups.

3. Results

All the animals survived for 48 h after nebulization. No signs of systemic compromise were reported prior to euthanasia.
Macroscopically, the trachea, nasal mucosa, and liver of all the groups appeared normal at the time of euthanasia. A similar degree of vascular changes (congestion or hemorrhage) in the lungs was observed in some animals from both the control and experimental groups. The hepatic tissue was macroscopically normal in all the animals in this study.
Microscopically, the organs of the control group animals presented with no signs of inflammation or necrosis, and with normal histological architecture (Figure 2). Mostly mild vascular changes (congestion, edema, and hemorrhage) were observed in the lungs of the animals from all four groups. More animals with lung hemorrhages were found in the control group (83.4%) than in the other groups (40% in group 1, 30% in group 2, and 10% in group 3) (p = 0.016). Likewise, a higher percentage of animals with intra-alveolar edema was observed in the control group (50%) compared to the other groups (0% in group 1, 0% in group 2, and 10% in group 3) (p = 0.008). The lungs from experimental groups 1, 2, and 3 showed mostly mild histopathological alterations, including slight perivascular inflammatory cell infiltration, mild interstitial edema, mild thickening of the alveolar septa, and scant vacuoles in the epithelium (Figure 3).
None of these evaluations were statistically different than those for the control group (Table 1). However, more macrophages in the alveoli were found in the nebulized mice (group 1, 60%; group 2, 100%; and group 3, 70%) compared to the control group (0%) (p < 0.001). No focal tracheal necrosis, change in the height of the bronchiolar epithelium, cell degeneration, or exfoliation were observed.
No histological changes were found in the livers of the animals nebulized with tocilizumab (Figure 4). Lastly, no statistical differences were found for the animal total score among all the groups (p = 0.251) (Table 2).

4. Discussion

Pulmonary drug delivery has emerged as a promising approach for treating a variety of respiratory conditions due to its ability to target the lungs directly, offering rapid drug absorption and potentially minimizing systemic side effects. This study explores the novel use of nebulized tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the IL-6 receptor, which has been widely used intravenously for conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic juvenile arthritis, and severe COVID-19 [7,8]. The severe complications of COVID-19, notably ARDS, often involve a cytokine release syndrome characterized by elevated levels of IL-6, among other markers [9]. Consequently, systemic anti-inflammatory treatments like corticosteroids and tocilizumab have been employed to manage these conditions, albeit with the risk of severe infections as side effects [11].
To date, tocilizumab has only been administered intravenously in clinical settings for COVID-19, with nebulized treatments being largely unexplored, except for inhaled interferon beta-1a and corticosteroids, which have shown efficacy at reducing hospital admissions and mortality in COVID-19 patients [17,18]. Nebulization of bronchodilators is necessary in some COPD/asthma patients with COVID-19, with maximal protection for patient and health workers [21,22,23]. Despite the potential benefits, there is a lack of empirical data on the use of nebulized monoclonal antibodies for treating pulmonary inflammatory diseases. This study aimed to fill this gap by assessing the histopathological changes in the respiratory tract and liver of mice exposed to nebulized tocilizumab.
The results demonstrate that all the mice survived the 48 h post-nebulization period without any signs of systemic compromise. The macroscopic examination revealed no abnormalities in the trachea, nasal mucosa, or liver across all the groups. Interestingly, the control group exhibited a higher incidence of lung hemorrhages and intra-alveolar edema compared to the experimental groups. This suggests that nebulization itself did not exacerbate these conditions. Pulmonary hemorrhage is a common finding in animals euthanized with CO2 [24]. Furthermore, it has been observed that the degree of pulmonary hemorrhage that develops depends on the conditions of CO2 euthanasia, which seems to have influenced this result [24,25].
The histopathological analysis showed mild vascular changes in and inflammation of the lungs across all the groups, with no significant differences between the control and experimental groups regarding most histological alterations. However, the presence of alveolar macrophages was significantly higher in the nebulized groups compared to the controls. Alveolar macrophages and bronchial/alveolar epithelial cells are the primary cells responsible for the handling of airborne particles in the lungs. Consequently, they produce pro-inflammatory mediators that can trigger both local inflammatory responses in the lungs and systemic inflammatory responses [26,27]. Alveolar macrophages play a pivotal role in the clearance and processing of inhaled environmental microparticles in both the airways and alveolar spaces. The primary function of these cells is to maintain clear air spaces by phagocytosing foreign materials. While processing the engulfed material, alveolar macrophages also function as antigen-presenting cells, thereby activating the adaptive immune response. These innate and adaptive immune responses are mutually interdependent, placing alveolar macrophages at the nexus of the two immune pathways [28]. Thus, this finding indicates an immunomodulatory effect of nebulized tocilizumab, potentially enhancing macrophage activity in the alveolar spaces, which could be beneficial in managing lung inflammation.
Importantly, no histological changes were observed in the livers of the nebulized mice, suggesting that tocilizumab did not induce hepatotoxicity when administered via this route. The absence of tracheal necrosis, bronchiolar epithelial changes, or significant cell degeneration in the nebulized groups further supports the safety of this administration method.
Tocilizumab is a 145 kDa lyophilized protein that is diluted into a liquid hydrophilic formulation. Consequently, it can be employed in mesh (aerosol) or jet (liquid droplet) nebulizing systems for inhalation. Tocilizumab is not a small molecule, as are some of the nebulized compounds that are commonly used in clinical practice (e.g., salbutamol (239.31 Da), budesonide (430.5 Da), and ipratropium bromide with 421.4 Da). Nevertheless, some large molecules, including cyclosporine (1202.6 Da), amphotericin B (924 Da), and colistin (1155.4 Da), have demonstrated clinical efficacy [29,30,31]. Given the observed changes in the nebulized mice, it appears that nebulization was an effective method for delivering the molecule.
Previous studies utilizing nebulized neutralizing antibodies in mice have demonstrated some benefits against viral and bacterial infection [32,33,34]. No antibodies against any interleukin have been tested previously; thus, this represents the inaugural experiment for studying the effects of a nebulized monoclonal antibody in mice based on an intravenous formulation. It was unnecessary to develop a novel formulation for this study, which provides in vivo evidence that cost-effective doses can be employed as nebulized agents to deliver drugs to the lung.
Despite these promising findings, this study’s limitations must be acknowledged. The short observation period (48 h) limits the understanding of the long-term effects and potential delayed toxicities. Additionally, this study was conducted in a controlled environment with specific dosages that may not directly translate to human applications. It is also important to consider that multiple factors are involved during nebulization, including molecular size, solubility, aggregation, temperature, effective clinical doses, and interface exposure. These factors have been discussed in detail in the literature [35,36,37]. Further research involving longer observation periods, varied dosages, and clinical trials in humans will be essential to fully establish the safety and efficacy of nebulized tocilizumab.
This study provides new insights for a better understanding of the effects of nebulized tocilizumab in the respiratory tract and liver of mice. Future studies using models of inflammatory lung diseases are necessary to establish the definitive role of nebulized monoclonal antibodies in the control of local lung inflammation.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study provides preliminary evidence supporting the feasibility and safety of nebulized tocilizumab for treating pulmonary inflammation. The findings suggest that nebulization can deliver tocilizumab effectively to the lungs without causing significant systemic or local adverse effects. This opens the possibility for further exploration and potential clinical applications in managing inflammatory lung diseases, including those caused by infections like COVID-19.

Author Contributions

C.H.-C., S.F. and P.J.d.A. contributed to the conceptualization, methodology, data analysis, and writing of the draft. P.J.d.A. performed for the histopathology study. A.F. and A.G. provided pharmacology assistance. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by ROCHE Pharma, 110049/001 Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, and Rey Juan Carlos Hospital. They had no role in this study’s design, data analysis, or the publishing process.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The experimental animals were handled in accordance with protocol PROEX 171.4/21, approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Rey Juan Carlos University. The use of animals was necessary to demonstrate the toxicity of nebulized tocilizumab (never used before). As mentioned in the Method Section, BALB/c mice (9 weeks old) were kept in the animal facility at 20–24 °C, 45–55% humidity, and with a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle with food and tap water ad libitum, with environmental enrichment, and housed in clean-air and viral- and antigen-free facilities with restricted access in the Veterinary Unit at Rey Juan Carlos University. The mice were allowed to acclimate for one week prior to use. The authors declare adherence to the ARRIVE guidelines.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset used and analyzed in the current study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Raquel Barba, Paola Brandi and David Sancho for scientific support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of this study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Thakur, A.K.; Chellappan, D.K.; Dua, K.; Mehta, M.; Satija, S.; Singh, I. Patented therapeutic drug delivery strategies for targeting pulmonary diseases. Expert. Opin. Ther. Pat. 2020, 30, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lalan, M.; Tandel, H.; Lalani, R.; Patel, V.; Misra, A. Inhalation Drug Therapy: Emerging Trends in Nasal and Pulmonary Drug Delivery. In Novel Drug Delivery Technologies; Misra, A., Shahiwala, A., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 291–333. ISBN 9789811336416. [Google Scholar]
  3. Newman, S.P. Delivering drugs to the lungs: The history of repurposing in the treatment of respiratory diseases. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 133, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mihara, M.; Nishimoto, N.; Ohsugi, Y. The therapy of autoimmune diseases by anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody. Expert. Opin. Biol. Ther. 2005, 5, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. De Benedetti, F.; Brunner, H.I.; Ruperto, N.; Kenwright, A.; Wright, S.; Calvo, I.; Cuttica, R.; Ravelli, A.; Schneider, R.; Woo, P.; et al. Randomized trial of tocilizumab in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 2385–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Teitsma, X.M.; Marijnissen, A.K.A.; Bijlsma, J.W.J.; Lafeber, F.P.J.; Jacobs, J.W.G. Tocilizumab as monotherapy or combination therapy for treating active rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety reported in randomized controlled trials. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2016, 18, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Singh, J.A.; Beg, S.; Lopez-Olivo, M.A. Tocilizumab for rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010, 7, CD008331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vela, D.; Vela-Gaxha, Z.; Rexhepi, M.; Olloni, R.; Hyseni, V.; Nallbani, R. Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab versus standard care/placebo in patients with COVID-19; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2022, 88, 1955–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, J.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020, 395, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Leisman, D.E.; Ronner, L.; Pinotti, R.; Taylor, M.D.; Sinha, P.; Calfee, C.S.; Hirayama, A.V.; Mastroiani, F.; Turtle, C.J.; Harhay, M.O.; et al. Cytokine elevation in severe and critical COVID-19: A rapid systematic review, meta-analysis, and comparison with other inflammatory syndromes. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 1233–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Recovery Collaborative Group; Horby, P.; Lim, W.S.; Emberson, J.R.; Mafham, M.; Bell, J.L.; Linsell, L.; Staplin, N.; Brightling, C.; Ustianowski, A.; et al. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Recovery Collaborative Group. Baricitinib in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): A randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial and updated meta-analysis. Lancet 2022, 400, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Amstutz, A.; Speich, B.; Mentré, F.; Rueegg, C.S.; Belhadi, D.; Assoumou, L.; Burdet, C.; Murthy, S.; Dodd, L.E.; Wang, Y.; et al. Effects of remdesivir in patients hospitalised with COVID-19: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir. Med. 2023, 11, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, S.-F.; Ying-Jung Wu, A.; Shin-Jung Lee, S.; Huang, Y.-S.; Lee, C.-Y.; Yang, T.-L.; Wang, H.-W.; Chen, H.J.; Chen, Y.C.; Ho, T.-S.; et al. COVID-19 associated mold infections: Review of COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis and mucormycosis. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2022, 56, 442–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Markovskaya, Y.; Gavioli, E.M.; Cusumano, J.A.; Glatt, A.E. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Secondary bacterial infections and the impact on antimicrobial resistance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Antimicrob. Steward. Heal. Epidemiol. 2022, 2, e114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jenks, N.P.; Driscoll, B.; Locke, T. Strongyloidiasis Hyperinfection Syndrome in COVID-19 Positive Migrants Treated with Corticosteroids. J. Immigr. Minor. Health 2022, 24, 1431–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Monk, P.D.; Marsden, R.J.; Tear, V.J.; Brookes, J.; Batten, T.N.; Mankowski, M.; Gabbay, F.J.; Davies, D.E.; Holgate, S.T.; Ho, L.-P.; et al. Safety and efficacy of inhaled nebulised interferon beta-1a (SNG001) for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 2021, 9, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Griesel, M.; Wagner, C.; Mikolajewska, A.; Stegemann, M.; Fichtner, F.; Metzendorf, M.-I.; Nair, A.A.; Daniel, J.; Fischer, A.-L.; Skoetz, N. Inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2022, 3, CD015125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Selickman, J.; Vrettou, C.S.; Mentzelopoulos, S.D.; Marini, J.J. COVID-19-Related ARDS: Key Mechanistic Features and Treatments. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 4896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pitiot, A.; Heuzé-Vourc’h, N.; Sécher, T. Alternative Routes of Administration for Therapeutic Antibodies-State of the Art. Antibodies 2022, 11, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Thibon, C.; Vecellio, L.; Dubus, J.-C.; Kabamba, B.; Reychler, G. Nebulization and COVID-19: Is the risk of spread actual? Respir. Med. 2022, 197, 106854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chilkoti, G.T.; Gondode, P.G.; Tiwari, S.S. MDI or nebulization in moderate to severe COVID-19 disease with COPD: Which one is better? Ain-Shams J. Anesthesiol. 2021, 13, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sethi, S.; Barjaktarevic, I.Z.; Tashkin, D.P. The use of nebulized pharmacotherapies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ther. Adv. Respir. Dis. 2020, 14, 1753466620954366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Renne, R.; Brix, A.; Harkema, J.; Herbert, R.; Kittel, B.; Lewis, D.; March, T.; Nagano, K.; Pino, M.; Rittinghausen, S.; et al. Proliferative and nonproliferative lesions of the rat and mouse respiratory tract. Toxicol. Pathol. 2009, 37, 5S–73S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fisher, S.; Burgess, W.L.; Hines, K.D.; Mason, G.L.; Owiny, J.R. Interstrain Differences in CO2-Induced Pulmonary Hemorrhage in Mice. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 2016, 55, 811–815. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. van Eeden, S.F.; Yeung, A.; Quinlam, K.; Hogg, J.C. Systemic response to ambient particulate matter: Relevance to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2005, 2, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Li, X.Y.; Gilmour, P.S.; Donaldson, K.; MacNee, W. Free radical activity and pro-inflammatory effects of particulate air pollution (PM10) in vivo and in vitro. Thorax 1996, 51, 1216–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Miyata, R.; van Eeden, S.F. The innate and adaptive immune response induced by alveolar macrophages exposed to ambient particulate matter. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2011, 257, 209–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Blot, F.; Tavakoli, R.; Sellam, S.; Epardeau, B.; Faurisson, F.; Bernard, N.; Becquemin, M.H.; Frachon, I.; Stern, M.; Pocidalo, J.J. Nebulized cyclosporine for prevention of acute pulmonary allograft rejection in the rat: Pharmacokinetic and histologic study. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 1995, 14, 1162–1172. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Cui, N.; Zhao, J. Application and evaluation of topical amphotericin B for the treatment of respiratory fungal infections. BMC Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Buendía, J.A.; Guerrero Patiño, D.; Zuluaga Salazar, A.F. Efficacy of adjunctive inhaled colistin and tobramycin for ventilator-associated pneumonia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulm. Med. 2024, 24, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Leyva-Grado, V.H.; Tan, G.S.; Leon, P.E.; Yondola, M.; Palese, P. Direct administration in the respiratory tract improves efficacy of broadly neutralizing anti-influenza virus monoclonal antibodies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 4162–4172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sécher, T.; Dalonneau, E.; Ferreira, M.; Parent, C.; Azzopardi, N.; Paintaud, G.; Si-Tahar, M.; Heuzé-Vourc’h, N. In a murine model of acute lung infection, airway administration of a therapeutic antibody confers greater protection than parenteral administration. J. Control Release 2019, 303, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Larios Mora, A.; Detalle, L.; Gallup, J.M.; Van Geelen, A.; Stohr, T.; Duprez, L.; Ackermann, M.R. Delivery of ALX-0171 by inhalation greatly reduces respiratory syncytial virus disease in newborn lambs. MAbs 2018, 10, 778–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hertel, S.P.; Winter, G.; Friess, W. Protein stability in pulmonary drug delivery via nebulization. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015, 93, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bodier-Montagutelli, E.; Respaud, R.; Perret, G.; Baptista, L.; Duquenne, P.; Heuzé-Vourc’h, N.; Vecellio, L. Protein stability during nebulization: Mind the collection step! Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2020, 152, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mayor, A.; Thibert, B.; Huille, S.; Respaud, R.; Audat, H.; Heuzé-Vourc’h, N. Inhaled antibodies: Formulations require specific development to overcome instability due to nebulization. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2021, 11, 1625–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceutics 16 00862 g001
Figure 1. Nebulization of tocilizumab (200 mg/mL) using a polymethyl methacrylate chamber (Emka technologies SAS).
Figure 1. Nebulization of tocilizumab (200 mg/mL) using a polymethyl methacrylate chamber (Emka technologies SAS).
Pharmaceutics 16 00862 g001
Pharmaceutics 16 00862 g002
Figure 2. Normal histological architecture in organs from mice nebulized with saline (control group). (A) Lung, original magnification (OM) ×10. (B) Liver, OM ×20.
Figure 2. Normal histological architecture in organs from mice nebulized with saline (control group). (A) Lung, original magnification (OM) ×10. (B) Liver, OM ×20.
Pharmaceutics 16 00862 g002
Pharmaceutics 16 00862 g003
Figure 3. Histopathological alterations observed in lungs of animals treated with nebulized tocilizumab. (A) Group 3 shows slight perivascular inflammatory cells infiltration, OM ×20. (B) Group 1 shows slight perivascular inflammatory cells infiltration, OM ×40. (C) Group 2 shows mild interstitial edema, OM ×40. (D) Group 1 shows mild thickening of alveolar septa, OM ×40. (E) Group 2 shows vacuole in the epithelium, OM ×40. (F) Group 3 shows macrophages in the intra-alveoli, OM ×40.
Figure 3. Histopathological alterations observed in lungs of animals treated with nebulized tocilizumab. (A) Group 3 shows slight perivascular inflammatory cells infiltration, OM ×20. (B) Group 1 shows slight perivascular inflammatory cells infiltration, OM ×40. (C) Group 2 shows mild interstitial edema, OM ×40. (D) Group 1 shows mild thickening of alveolar septa, OM ×40. (E) Group 2 shows vacuole in the epithelium, OM ×40. (F) Group 3 shows macrophages in the intra-alveoli, OM ×40.
Pharmaceutics 16 00862 g003
Pharmaceutics 16 00862 g004
Figure 4. Normal liver histological architecture in animals treated with nebulized tocilizumab. (A) Group 1, OM ×10. (B) Group 2, OM ×10. (C) Group 3. (D) Control group, OM ×40.
Figure 4. Normal liver histological architecture in animals treated with nebulized tocilizumab. (A) Group 1, OM ×10. (B) Group 2, OM ×10. (C) Group 3. (D) Control group, OM ×40.
Pharmaceutics 16 00862 g004
Table 1. Histopathological changes observed in the respiratory tracts of the animals in this study (control: nebulized with saline; group 1: nebulized with 2.5 mg of tocilizumab; group 2: nebulized with 5 mg of tocilizumab; group 3: nebulized with 10 mg of tocilizumab).
Table 1. Histopathological changes observed in the respiratory tracts of the animals in this study (control: nebulized with saline; group 1: nebulized with 2.5 mg of tocilizumab; group 2: nebulized with 5 mg of tocilizumab; group 3: nebulized with 10 mg of tocilizumab).
Histological ChangesDegreeControl
(N = 6)		Group 1
(N = 10)		Group 2
(N = 10)		Group 3
(N = 10)		p Value *
Vacuole on
epithelial cells		Absence6 (100%)9 (90%)8 (80%)9 (90%)0.665
Mild01 (10%)2 (20%)1 (10%)
Moderate0000
Severe0000
Bronchiole detritusAbsence2 (33.3%)9 (90%)10 (100%)9 (90%)0.004
Mild4 (66.6%)1 (10%)01 (10%)
Moderate0000
Severe0000
Perivascular
infiltration		Absence6 (100%)9 (90%)8 (80%)8 (80%)0.633
Mild01 (10%)2 (20%)2 (20%)
Moderate0000
Severe0000
Intra-alveolar
macrophage
infiltration		Absence6 (100%)4 (40%)03 (30%)<0.001
Mild06 (60%)10 (100%)7 (70%)
Moderate0000
Severe00000
Thickening of
alveolar septa		Absence1 (16.6%)5 (50%)3 (30%)3 (30%)0.337
Mild4 (66.6%)5 (50%)7 (70%)7 (70%)
Moderate1 (16.6%)000
Severe0000
Intra-alveolar
fibrin		Absence3 (50%)8 (80%)5 (50%)6 (60%)0.505
Mild3 (50%)2 (20%)5 (50%)4 (40%)
Moderate0000
Severe0000
Intra-alveolar
edema		Absence3 (50%)10 (100%)10 (100%)9 (90%)0.008
Mild3 (50%)001 (10%)
Moderate0000
Severe0000
Vascular congestionAbsence1 (16.6%)2 (20%)01 (10%)0.452
Mild3 (50%)5 (50%)5 (50%)8 (80%)
Moderate2 (33.3%)3 (30%)5 (50%)1 (1%)
Severe0000
HemorrhagesAbsence1 (16.6%)6 (60%)7 (70%)9 (90%)0.016
Mild5 (83.4%)2 (20%)3 (30%)1 (10%)
Moderate02 (20%)00
Severe0000
Platelet aggregationAbsence4 (66.6%)5 (50%)7 (70%)3 (30%)0.288
Mild2 (33.3%)5 (50%)3 (30%)7 (70%)
Moderate0000
Severe0000
* Numbers in bold denote statistically significant differences.
Table 2. Scoring categories for the animals in this study (control: nebulized with saline; group 1: nebulized with 2.5 mg of tocilizumab; group 2: nebulized with 5 mg of tocilizumab; group 3: nebulized with 10 mg of tocilizumab).
Table 2. Scoring categories for the animals in this study (control: nebulized with saline; group 1: nebulized with 2.5 mg of tocilizumab; group 2: nebulized with 5 mg of tocilizumab; group 3: nebulized with 10 mg of tocilizumab).
Category *Control (N = 6)Group 1 (N = 10)Group 2 (N = 10)Group 3 (N = 10)p Value
000000.251
13 (50%)9 (90%)8 (80%)6 (60%)
23 (50%)1 (10%)2 (20%)4 (40%)
30000
* Categories stablished according to the total score for each animal: 0 (no histological changes), 1 (scoring between 1 and 3), 2 (scoring between 4 and 6), and 3 (scoring higher than 6).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Andres, P.J.; Ferreiro, S.; Flores, A.; Garcia, A.; Henriquez-Camacho, C. Histological Assessment of Respiratory Tract and Liver of BALB/c Mice Nebulized with Tocilizumab. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 862. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16070862

AMA Style

de Andres PJ, Ferreiro S, Flores A, Garcia A, Henriquez-Camacho C. Histological Assessment of Respiratory Tract and Liver of BALB/c Mice Nebulized with Tocilizumab. Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(7):862. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16070862

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Andres, Paloma Jimena, Sergio Ferreiro, Angela Flores, Almudena Garcia, and Cesar Henriquez-Camacho. 2024. "Histological Assessment of Respiratory Tract and Liver of BALB/c Mice Nebulized with Tocilizumab" Pharmaceutics 16, no. 7: 862. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16070862

APA Style

de Andres, P. J., Ferreiro, S., Flores, A., Garcia, A., & Henriquez-Camacho, C. (2024). Histological Assessment of Respiratory Tract and Liver of BALB/c Mice Nebulized with Tocilizumab. Pharmaceutics, 16(7), 862. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16070862

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop