The Role of Mobile Application Acceptance in Shaping E-Customer Service
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- To investigate the effects of mobile app acceptance on e-commerce service delivery;
- To explore factors contributing to the increasing use of mobile app acceptance in e-commerce;
- To investigate the way mobile app acceptance is shaping e-customer service.
2. Literature Review
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
4.1. Quantitative Result
4.2. Qualitative Results
4.2.1. Effects of Mobile App Acceptance on E-Commerce Service Delivery
Participant 5: “Mobile app acceptance is more convenient which contribute to the outstanding customer experience when purchasing products on e-commerce platforms.”
Participant 2: “There is improved service delivery from online retailers. The improved service delivery is attributed to the easiness to access quality products, high responsive rate, and convenience.”
4.2.2. Factors Contributing to Increased Mobile App Acceptance in E-Commerce
Participant 2: “Most customers are embracing mobile app acceptance because of the convenience in accessing the products and service offered by online retailers.”
Participant 3: “The increasing adoption of the mobile app is associated with the perceived ease of use and faster execution of transactions.”
4.2.3. Ways Mobile App Acceptance Is Shaping Customer Service
Participant 5: “Online retailers have improved service delivery to customers such as faster response to inquiries and quick order placement.”
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pantano, E.; Servidio, R. Modeling innovative points of sales through virtual and immersive technologies. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2012, 19, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodhani, A. Shops offer e-tail experience. Eng. Technol. 2012, 7, 46–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pantano, E.; Di Pietro, L. Understanding Consumer’s Acceptance of Technology-Based Innovations in Retailing. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2012, 7, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pantano, E.; Viassone, M. Demand-pull and technology push perspective in technology-based innovations for the points of sale: The retailer’s evaluation. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2014, 2, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.G. Electronic commerce: A study on benefits and challenges in an emerging economy. Glob. J. Manag. Bus. Res. 2016, 8, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
- Shahriari, S.; Shahriari, M.; Gheiji, S. E-commerce and it impacts on global trend and market. Int. J. Res. Granthaalayah 2015, 3, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeLima, R.; Budi, H.; Andriyanto, N.; Wibowo, A. Development of Purchasing Module for Agriculture E-Commerce using Dynamic System Development Model. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2018, 9, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Išoraitė, M.; Miniotienė, N. Electronic Commerce: Theory and Practice. Integr. J. Bus. Econ. 2018, 2, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basarir-Ozel, B.; Mardikyan, S. Factors affecting E-commerce Adoption: A case of Turkey. Int. J. Manag. Sci. Inf. Technol. 2017, 23, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Khrais, L.T. Role of Artificial Intelligence in Shaping Consumer Demand in E-Commerce. Futur. Internet 2020, 12, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Algharabat, R.S.; Rana, N.P. Social Commerce in Emerging Markets and its Impact on Online Community Engagement. Inf. Syst. Front. 2020, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Yao, T.; Li, M.; Wang, X. How does social support promote consumers’ engagement in the social commerce community? The mediating effect of consumer involvement. Inf. Process. Manag. 2020, 57, 102272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alalwan, A.A.; Algharabat, R.S.; Baabdullah, A.M.; Rana, N.P.; Qasem, Z.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Examining the impact of mobile interactivity on customer engagement in the context of mobile shopping. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2020, 33, 627–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Al-Tit, A.A. E-commerce Drivers and Barriers and Their Impact on E-customer Loyalty in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMES). Versl. Teor. Prakt. 2020, 21, 146–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Regnault, A.; International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL); Mixed Methods Special Interest Group (SIG); Willgoss, T.; Barbic, S. Towards the use of mixed methods inquiry as best practice in health outcomes research. J. Patient Rep. Outcomes 2018, 2, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Timans, R.; Wouters, P.; Heilbron, J. Mixed methods research: What it is and what it could be. Theory Soc. 2019, 48, 193–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brierley, J.A. The role of a pragmatist paradigm when adopting mixed methods in behavioral accounting research. Int. J. Behav. Account. Financ. 2017, 6, 140–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ames, H.; Claire, G.; Simon, L. Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: A worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication. BMC Med Res. Methodol. 2019, 19, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, D.P. Sampling Methods in Research Design Headache. J. Head Face Pain 2020, 60, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eyisi, D. The Usefulness of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Researching Problem-Solving Ability in Science Education Curriculum. J. Educ. Pract. 2016, 7, 91–100. [Google Scholar]
- Nowell, L.S.; Norris, J.M.; White, D.E.; Moules, N.J. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2017, 16, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Model | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Regression | 10.936 | 4 | 2.734 | 30.419 | 0 |
Residual | 9.437 | 105 | 0.09 | ||
Total | 20.373 | 109 |
Model | t | df | Sig. (2-tailed) | Mean Difference | 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||||
I prefer using mobile applications when purchasing products and services because of convenience? | 45.539 | 109 | 0.000 | 4.227 | 4.04 | 4.41 |
I prefer using a mobile application when purchasing products and services because it is simple to use | 46.535 | 109 | 0.000 | 4.009 | 3.84 | 4.18 |
Do mobile app acceptance positively influence e-customer service? | 44.923 | 109 | 0.000 | 4.055 | 3.88 | 4.23 |
Do mobile app acceptance increase customer experience and engagement? | 65.316 | 109 | 0.000 | 4.255 | 4.13 | 4.38 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Khrais, L.T.; Alghamdi, A.M. The Role of Mobile Application Acceptance in Shaping E-Customer Service. Future Internet 2021, 13, 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13030077
Khrais LT, Alghamdi AM. The Role of Mobile Application Acceptance in Shaping E-Customer Service. Future Internet. 2021; 13(3):77. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13030077
Chicago/Turabian StyleKhrais, Laith T., and Abdullah M. Alghamdi. 2021. "The Role of Mobile Application Acceptance in Shaping E-Customer Service" Future Internet 13, no. 3: 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13030077
APA StyleKhrais, L. T., & Alghamdi, A. M. (2021). The Role of Mobile Application Acceptance in Shaping E-Customer Service. Future Internet, 13(3), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13030077