Are Residents Willing to Pay for Electric Cars? An Evolutionary Game Analysis of Electric Vehicle Promotion in Macao
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Dynamic Evolutionary Game
2.2. Frontiers of Electric Vehicle Development
2.3. Macao Electric Vehicle Purchasing Behavior
3. Methodology
3.1. Stakeholders and Underlying Assumptions
3.2. Model Construction
3.3. Expected Return Function Construction
3.4. Stabilization Strategies Based on System Evolution
4. System Simulation Case Analysis
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hossain, M.S.; Kumar, L.; Islam, M.M.; Selvaraj, J. A Comprehensive Review on the Integration of Electric Vehicles for Sustainable Development. J. Adv. Transp. 2022, 2022, 3868388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iflah, A.; Ahmad, A. Electric Vehicles for Environmental Sustainability. In Smart Technologies for Energy and Environmental Sustainability; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 131–145. [Google Scholar]
- Ning, W.; Pan, H.; Zheng, W. Assessment of the Incentives on Electric Vehicle Promotion in China. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2017, 101, 177–189. [Google Scholar]
- Alimujiang, A.; Jiang, P. Synergy and co-benefits of reducing CO2 and air pollutant emissions by promoting electric vehicles—A case of Shanghai. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2020, 55, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajanovic, A.; Haas, R. Dissemination of electric vehicles in urban areas: Major factors for success. Energy 2016, 115, 1451–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerssen-Gondelach, S.J.; Faaij, A.P. Performance of batteries for electric vehicles on short and longer term. J. Power Sources 2012, 212, 111–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanguesa, J.A.; Torres-Sanz, V.; Garrido, P.; Martinez, F.J.; Marquez-Barja, J.M. A Review on Electric Vehicles: Technologies and Challenges. Smart Cities 2021, 4, 372–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghadikolaei, M.A.; Wong, P.K.; Cheung, C.S.; Zhao, J.; Ning, Z.; Yung, K.-F.; Wong, H.C.; Gali, N.K. Why Is the World Not yet Ready to Use Alternative Fuel Vehicles? Heliyon 2021, 7, e07527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mwangi, J.K.; Lee, W.-J.; Chang, Y.-C.; Chen, C.-Y.; Wang, L.-C. An overview: Energy saving and pollution reduction by using green fuel blends in diesel engines. Appl. Energy 2015, 159, 214–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, I.K.W.; Liu, Y.; Sun, X.; Zhang, H.; Xu, W. Factors Influencing the Behavioural Intention towards Full Electric Vehicles: An Empirical Study in Macau. Sustainability 2015, 7, 12564–12585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lau, Y.; Wu, Y.A.; Yan, M.W. Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructures in the Greater Bay Area of China: Progress, Challenges and Efforts. Front. Future Transp. 2022, 3, 893583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coffman, M.; Bernstein, P.; Wee, S. Electric vehicles revisited: A review of factors that affect adoption. Transp. Rev. 2016, 37, 79–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishna, G. Understanding and identifying barriers to electric vehicle adoption through thematic analysis. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2021, 10, 100364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Featherman, M.; Jia, S.; Califf, C.B.; Hajli, N. The impact of new technologies on consumers beliefs: Reducing the perceived risks of electric vehicle adoption. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 169, 120847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muratori, M.; Alexander, M.; Arent, D.; Bazilian, M.; Cazzola, P.; Dede, E.M.; Farrell, J.; Gearhart, C.; Greene, D.; Jenn, A.; et al. The rise of electric vehicles—2020 status and future expectations. Prog. Energy 2021, 3, 022002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rietmann, N.; Lieven, T. How policy measures succeeded to promote electric mobility—Worldwide review and outlook. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 206, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, J.; Chen, X.; Qiu, R.; Hou, S. Electric vehicle industry sustainable development with a stakeholder engagement system. Technol. Soc. 2021, 67, 101771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muhammad, I.; Ahmad, M. Relating Consumers’ Information and Willingness to Buy Electric Vehicles: Does Personality Matter? Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2021, 100, 103049. [Google Scholar]
- Sierzchula, W.; Bakker, S.; Maat, K.; van Wee, B. The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy 2014, 68, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zikai, Z.; Sheng, N.; Zhao, D.; Cai, K.; Yang, G.; Song, Q. Are Residents More Willing to Buy and Pay for Electric Vehicles under the “Carbon Neutrality”? Energy Rep. 2023, 9, 510–521. [Google Scholar]
- Lampo, A.; Silva, S.C.; Duarte, P. The role of environmental concern and technology show-off on electric vehicles adoption: The case of Macau. Int. J. Emerg. Mark. 2023, 5, 8809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Xu, S.; He, Z.; Li, C.; Meng, X. Factors Influencing Adoption Intention for Electric Vehicles under a Subsidy Deduction: From Different City-Level Perspectives. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riechert, S.E.; Hammerstein, P. Game Theory in the Ecological Context. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1983, 14, 377–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hodgson, G.M.; Stoelhorst, J.W. Introduction to the special issue on the future of institutional and evolutionary economics. J. Institutional Econ. 2014, 10, 513–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michael, R.; Sterman, J.D. Evolutionary Economics and System Dynamics. Evol. Concepts Contemp. Econ. 1994, 34, 61–89. [Google Scholar]
- Callegari, B.; Feder, C. The long-term economic effects of pandemics: Toward an evolutionary approach. Ind. Corp. Chang. 2021, 31, 715–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandholm, W.H. Evolutionary Game Theory. In Complex Social and Behavioral Systems: Game Theory and Agent-Based Models; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Holling, C.S. Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems. Ecosystems 2001, 4, 390–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soares, J.; Pinto, T.; Lezama, F.; Morais, H. Survey on Complex Optimization and Simulation for the New Power Systems Paradigm. Complexity 2018, 2018, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perera, A.T.D.; Kamalaruban, P. Applications of Reinforcement Learning in Energy Systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 137, 110618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalid, A.; Anwar, A. Pro-environment consumer behaviour and electric vehicle adoptions: A comparative regional meta-analysis. Appl. Econ. 2024, 1, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, J.; Zheng, X. Do consumers try to solve the air pollution problem themselves? the effects of air pollution on purchase of hybrid and electric cars. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2024, 220, 850–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aravindan, K.L.; Izzat, M.A.; Ramayah, T.; Chen, T.S.; Choong, Y.V.; Annamalah, S.; Ilhavenil, N.; Bin Ahmad, A. Determinants of Electric Car Patronage Intention. Int. J. Technol. 2023, 14, 1393–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, G.; Yang, S. A comparative study of motivations driving EV purchases in different-tier Chinese cities. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2024, 126, 103993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramadani, V.; Armutcu, B.; Reshidi, N.; Tan, A.; Ince, E. Antecedents of electric vehicle purchasing behaviors: Evidence from Türkiye. Bus. Ethic-Environ. Responsib. 2024, 2, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scarlat, G.; Rosenzweig, S.; Rubin, O. Which Energy Labels Should We Use to Expedite the Transition to Electric Vehicles? Front. Environ. Sci. 2024, 12, 1354677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stekelberg, J.; Vance, T. The effect of transferable tax benefits on consumer intent to purchase an electric vehicle. Energy Policy 2024, 186, 113936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.-X.; Chee, W.M.; Bin Jantan, A.H.; Xia, Y.-H.; Xue, H.; Ye, M.-J.; Zhang, Q.; Wong, P.P.W.; Gong, Y.; Wang, L. Impact of perceived value in virtual brand communities on purchase intention of domestic electric vehicles. Acta Psychol. 2024, 248, 104371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soodan, V.; Saha, S. Applying an Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour to Predict Indian Customer’s E-Vehicle Purchase Intention. Int. J. Appl. Manag. Sci. 2023, 15, 258–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; Furuoka, F.; Rasiah, R.A.; Shen, E. Consumers’ Purchase Intention toward Electric Vehicles from the Perspective of Perceived Green Value: An Empirical Survey from China. World Electr. Veh. J. 2024, 15, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qadir, S.A.; Ahmad, F.; Al-Wahedi, A.M.A.B.; Iqbal, A.; Ali, A. Navigating the Complex Realities of Electric Vehicle Adoption: A Comprehensive Study of Government Strategies, Policies, and Incentives. Energy Strategy Rev. 2024, 53, 101379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razi, F.; Dincer, I. A review of the current state, challenges, opportunities and future directions for implementation of sustainable electric vehicle infrastructure in Canada. J. Energy Storage 2022, 56, 106048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghorbani, A.; Fartash, K. Challenges of Smart Grid Technology Deployment in Developing Countries: Case Study of Iran. In Handbook of Smart Energy Systems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 2551–2572. [Google Scholar]
- Broadbent, G.H.; Metternicht, G.I.; Wiedmann, T.O. Increasing Electric Vehicle Uptake by Updating Public Policies to Shift Attitudes and Perceptions: Case Study of New Zealand. Energies 2021, 14, 2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, Q.; Fu, H.; Yan, J.; Li, Z. How does energy utilization affect rural sustainability development in traditional villages? Re-examination from the coupling coordination degree of atmosphere-ecology-socioeconomics system. J. Affect. Disord. 2024, 257, 111541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, C.; Qian, Y.; Song, X.; Xie, M.; Duan, H.; Shen, P.; Qiao, Q. Are Electric Vehicles Really the Optimal Option for the Transportation Sector in China to Approach Pollution Reduction and Carbon Neutrality Goals? J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 356, 120648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leurent, F.; Windisch, E. Triggering the development of electric mobility: A review of public policies. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2011, 3, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onat, N.C. How to Compare Sustainability Impacts of Alternative Fuel Vehicles? Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2022, 102, 103129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hidrue, M.K.; Parsons, G.R.; Kempton, W.; Gardner, M.P. Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resour. Energy Econ. 2011, 33, 686–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Long, R.; Chen, H.; Geng, J. A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 78, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, S.-C.; Xu, J.-H.; Fan, Y. Willingness to pay and preferences for alternative incentives to EV purchase subsidies: An empirical study in China. Energy Econ. 2019, 81, 197–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shepherd, S.; Bonsall, P.; Harrison, G. Factors affecting future demand for electric vehicles: A model based study. Transp. Policy 2012, 20, 62–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harvey, L.D.D. Rethinking Electric Vehicle Subsidies, Rediscovering Energy Efficiency. Energy Policy 2020, 146, 111760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, F.; Walls, W.; Zheng, X.; Li, G. Evaluating environmental benefits from driving electric vehicles: The case of Shanghai, China. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2023, 119, 103749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Bai, X.; Shang, J. Is Subsidized Electric Vehicles Adoption Sustainable: Consumers’ Perceptions and Motivation toward Incentive Policies, Environmental Benefits, and Risks. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 192, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, S.-C.; Fan, Y.; Feng, L. An evaluation of government incentives for new energy vehicles in China focusing on vehicle purchasing restrictions. Energy Policy 2017, 110, 609–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madina, C.; Zamora, I.; Zabala, E. Methodology for assessing electric vehicle charging infrastructure business models. Energy Policy 2015, 89, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R.R.; Alok, K. Adoption of electric vehicle: A literature review and prospects for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 253, 119911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahzad, K.; Cheema, I.I. Low-carbon technologies in automotive industry and decarbonizing transport. J. Power Sources 2024, 591, 233888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Oliveira, M.S.; Steffen, V.; Trojan, F. Systematic Literature Review on Electric Vehicles and Multicriteria Decision Making: Trends, Rankings, and Future Perspectives. J. Intell. Manag. Decis. 2024, 3, 22–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kautish, P.; Lavuri, R.; Roubaud, D.; Grebinevych, O. Electric vehicles’ choice behaviour: An emerging market scenario. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 354, 120250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Franke, T.; Krems, J.F. Understanding Charging Behaviour of Electric Vehicle Users. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2013, 21, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Encarnação, S.; Santos, F.P.; Santos, F.C.; Blass, V.; Pacheco, J.M.; Portugali, J. Paths to the Adoption of Electric Vehicles: An Evolutionary Game Theoretical Approach. Transp. Res. Part B-Methodol. 2018, 113, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinha, P.; Paul, K.; Deb, S.; Sachan, S. Comprehensive Review Based on the Impact of Integrating Electric Vehicle and Renewable Energy Sources to the Grid. Energies 2023, 16, 2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saputra, Y.M.; Nguyen, D.N.; Hoang, D.T.; Vu, T.X.; Dutkiewicz, E.; Chatzinotas, S. Federated Learning Meets Contract Theory: Economic-Efficiency Framework for Electric Vehicle Networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020, 21, 2803–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; Chen, C.; Beshiwork, B.A.; Lin, B. Developing a low-carbon hybrid of ammonia fuel cell and internal combustion engine for carbon neutrality. Appl. Energy Combust. Sci. 2023, 16, 100214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balaji, V.; Anthony, X.M. Development of high entropy alloys (HEAs): Current trends. Heliyon 2024, 10, e26464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rapson, D.S.; Muehlegger, E. The Economics of Electric Vehicles. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2023, 17, 274–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leurent, F.; Windisch, E. Benefits and Costs of Electric Vehicles for the Public Finances: An Integrated Valuation Model Based on Input–Output Analysis, with Application to France. Res. Transp. Econ. 2015, 50, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Bao, H.; Zhang, S.; Xiang, Y. A SEM–Neural Network Approach to Predict Customers’ Intention to Purchase Battery Electric Vehicles in China’s Zhejiang Province. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peters, A.; Dütschke, E. How do Consumers Perceive Electric Vehicles? A Comparison of German Consumer Groups. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2014, 16, 359–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morrissey, P.; Weldon, P.; O’mahony, M. Future standard and fast charging infrastructure planning: An analysis of electric vehicle charging behaviour. Energy Policy 2016, 89, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, R.; Fan, R.; Wang, D.; Yao, Q. Effects of multiple incentives on electric vehicle charging infrastructure deployment in China: An evolutionary analysis in complex network. Energy 2023, 264, 125747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Higueras-Castillo, E.; Guillén, A.; Herrera, L.-J.; Liébana-Cabanillas, F. Adoption of Electric Vehicles: Which Factors Are Really Important? Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2021, 15, 799–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Margaret, T. Consumer Behavior and the Plug-in Electric Vehicle Purchase Decision Process: A Research Synthesis. eScholarship: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, F.; Molin, E.; Timmermans, H.; van Wee, B. Consumer preferences for business models in electric vehicle adoption. Transp. Policy 2018, 73, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moradi, A.; Vagnoni, E. A Multi-Level Perspective Analysis of Urban Mobility System Dynamics: What Are the Future Transition Pathways? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2018, 126, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munthe, K.; Simanihuruk, P.; Sitinjak, C.; Ober, J.; Kochmańska, A. Optimization of Financial Management for Enhancing the Electric Vehicle Market in Medan, Indonesia. Manag. Syst. Prod. Eng. 2024, 32, 212–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukherjee, I.; Coban, M.K.; Bali, A.S. Policy capacities and effective policy design: A review. Policy Sci. 2021, 54, 243–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panagiotis, D. Corporate Social Responsibility: Stakeholder Theory, and Conceptual Framework. In Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance; Taylor & Francis: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 13–30. [Google Scholar]
Parameters | Meaning |
---|---|
CH | The costs associated with the active residents’ purchase of electric vehicles are significant. |
Cz | Further maintenance costs are required after the residents have purchased an electric vehicle. |
IH | Subsequent comprehensive benefits available to the residents from the active purchase of electric vehicles. |
R | The residents receive financial subsidies from the government for actively purchasing electric vehicles. |
K | There is a financial cost to the government in choosing to promote actively. |
M | The government actively promotes access to the representational benefits associated with managing the environment. The government is actively promoting the purchase of electric vehicles for the residents. |
IL | The residents can reap the benefits of cost savings when choosing a passive electric vehicle purchasing strategy. |
S1 | The residents bear fuel costs for the negative purchase of electric vehicles. |
S2 | The residents’ purchases of electric vehicles will bear the loss of maintenance costs due to technological obsolescence. |
S3 | The potential environmental costs of damaging residents’ purchases of electric vehicles are significant. |
S4 | The cost of the energy transition can negatively impact residents’ purchases of electric vehicles. |
GZ | The government bears the cost of residents’ impacts on society due to the residents’ negative purchase of electric vehicles. |
CL | The impact of negative purchasing by the residents on residents’ energy safety is significant. |
H | The government gains local economic development at the expense of the environment. |
L | When the government is passive, problems arise under the residents’ passive purchasing strategy, causing damage to society. |
Revenue Matrix | Macao Residents (P) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Active Participation | Passive Participation | ||
(y) | (1 − y) | ||
Macao Government (G) | Active promote (x) | IH + R − CH − Cz; M − K − R | IL − S1 − S2 − S3 − S4; S1 − K − GZ |
Negative promote (1 − x) | IH − CH − Cz; − L | IL − CL; H − Gz |
Balance Point | Eigenvalue | Determinant | Trace |
---|---|---|---|
, | |||
, | |||
, | |||
, |
Balance Point | Determinant Symbol | Tracer Symbol | Results | Evolutionary Chart |
---|---|---|---|---|
ESS | ||||
Saddle Point | ||||
Saddle Point | ||||
Point of Instability |
Balance Point | Determinant Symbol | Tracer Symbol | Results | Evolutionary Chart |
---|---|---|---|---|
ESS | ||||
Point of Instability | ||||
Saddle Point | ||||
Saddle Point |
Balance Point | Determinant Symbol | Tracer Symbol | Results | Evolutionary Chart |
---|---|---|---|---|
ESS | ||||
Saddle Point | ||||
Point of Instability | ||||
Saddle Point |
Balance Point | Determinant Symbol | Tracer Symbol | Results | Evolutionary Chart |
---|---|---|---|---|
+ | − | ESS | ||
+ | + | Point of Instability | ||
+ | + | Point of Instability | ||
+ | − | ESS | ||
− | 0 | Saddle Point |
Balance Point | Determinant Symbol | Tracer Symbol | Results | Evolutionary Chart |
---|---|---|---|---|
− | ± | Saddle Point | ||
− | ± | Saddle Point | ||
− | ± | Saddle Point | ||
− | ± | Saddle Point |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Cai, R.; Li, L.; Lei, W. Are Residents Willing to Pay for Electric Cars? An Evolutionary Game Analysis of Electric Vehicle Promotion in Macao. World Electr. Veh. J. 2024, 15, 371. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15080371
Cai R, Li L, Lei W. Are Residents Willing to Pay for Electric Cars? An Evolutionary Game Analysis of Electric Vehicle Promotion in Macao. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2024; 15(8):371. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15080371
Chicago/Turabian StyleCai, Rongjiang, Lue Li, and Wenchang Lei. 2024. "Are Residents Willing to Pay for Electric Cars? An Evolutionary Game Analysis of Electric Vehicle Promotion in Macao" World Electric Vehicle Journal 15, no. 8: 371. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15080371
APA StyleCai, R., Li, L., & Lei, W. (2024). Are Residents Willing to Pay for Electric Cars? An Evolutionary Game Analysis of Electric Vehicle Promotion in Macao. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15(8), 371. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15080371