Next Article in Journal
Replication Kinetics and Infectivity of African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) Variants with Different Genotypes or Levels of Virulence in Cell Culture Models of Primary Porcine Macrophages
Previous Article in Journal
Biosynthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Using Garlic Peel Extract and Their Antibacterial Potential
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Microbial-Derived Carotenoids and Their Health Benefits

1
Applied Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Forestry, North Eastern Regional Institute of Science and Technology, Nirjuli 791109, India
2
Department of Botany, University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226007, India
3
College of Life Science & Biotechnology, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microbiol. Res. 2024, 15(3), 1670-1689; https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres15030111
Submission received: 13 May 2024 / Revised: 23 July 2024 / Accepted: 16 August 2024 / Published: 27 August 2024

Abstract

:
Natural carotenoids (CARs) such as β-carotene, astaxanthin, lutein, norbixin, bixin, capsanthin, lycopene, β-Apo-8-carotenal, canthaxanthin, β-apo-8-carotenal-ester, and zeaxanthin are being explored for possible applications in feed, food, cosmeceuticals, and nutraceuticals. Three primary areas of carotenoid research are emerging: (1) encapsulations for improved chemical and physical properties; (2) natural source carotenoid manufacturing; and (3) preclinical, epidemiological, and clinical studies of carotenoids’ potential health benefits. The recent advancements in research on the chemistry and antioxidant activity, marketing strategies, dietary sources, bioavailability, and bioaccessibility, extraction, dietary consumption, encapsulating techniques, and health advantages of carotenoids are all extensively discussed in this review. Carotenoids are pigments found naturally in most fruits and vegetables, algae, plants, and photosynthetic bacteria. Carotenoids cannot be synthesized by humans and must be consumed in the form of food or supplements. There are several roles for carotenoids in human health. Although individual carotenoids may function in different ways, their main action is to act as antioxidants. There are validated techniques for separating and purifying carotenoids, yet, industrial production requires the development of economically viable techniques for larger-scale implementation. Carotenoids have been shown to boost cognitive performance and cardiovascular health, as well as help prevent some types of cancer. Despite evidence for carotenoids’ health benefits, major population-based supplementation trials have yielded conflicting outcomes for several carotenoids. This review includes recent developments in carotenoid metabolism and nutritional and health advantages. It also offers an outlook on future directions in these areas.

1. Introduction

A wide variety of lipid-soluble pigments known as carotenoids are found in red, orange, and yellow colours. A vast range of living organisms, such as bacteria, photosynthetic plants, microalgae, and, to a greater extent, yeasts and fungi, naturally contain them [1]. Certain carotenoids function as photoprotectors and precursors for the manufacture of vitamin A [2,3]. Approximately 700 different chemical compounds with unusual pigments and biological characteristics make up these pigments [4]. Carotenoids are lipophilic isoprenoid molecules with double bonds forming a chromophore that absorbs light, giving them their colouration properties [5]. Carotenoids are sensitive to heat, light, oxygen, and acids as well as processes like oxidation and isomerization, because of these double bonds [6,7,8]. An aggregate of 691 distinct organisms is the source of about 1158 naturally occurring carotenoids [9]. Only a limited number of carotenoids including canthaxanthin, lutein, astaxanthin, β-carotene, and lycopene are currently commercially accessible [2]. The market demand for different carotenoids is rising as a result of the growing number of uses in the animal feed, food processing, pharmaceutical, and cosmetics industries [2,10]. As an alternative to synthetic additives, the synthesis of carotenoids from microorganisms emerged to rival that of carotenoids produced by chemical techniques [11]. As evidenced by the rise in research on microbiological dyes, biotechnology has been viewed as the greatest substitute for the natural pigment market since different microorganisms can synthesise carotenoids [12]. Some benefits of biotechnological production are optimized control of cultivation, reduced production time, and the capacity of microorganisms to use inexpensive substrates [13,14]). Chemical synthesis is frequently used to produce carotenoids for commercial use. On the other hand, excessive amounts of carotenoids that are synthetic may be toxic to human health, and their production creates dangerous waste [15,16]. However, plant-based carotenoids for commercial use are somewhat costly, and their availability is restricted by unpredictable weather and geographic variations [10,17]. About 20 out of 700 carotenoids are detected in human blood and tissues, while approximately 50 are found in the human diet [18]. These include the most significant ones: α-Carotene, β-Carotene, Lycopene (LYC), Zeaxanthin, Lutein, β-Cryptoxanthin, γ-Carotene, α-Cryptoxanthin, Fucoxanthin (Fx), Phytofluene, Neurosporene, and Phytoen [19].
Several economically important carotenoids are currently being produced using microalgal platforms, but carotenoids produced using metabolic pathway engineering of bacteria and fungi are still in the early stages of development. Commercial production of carotenoids has been established using microalgae such as H. pluvialis (Astaxanthin), Dunaliella salina (β-carotene, open pond technology), Chlorella zofingiensis (Canthaxanthin), Botryococcus braunii (Echinenone), Phaeodactylum tricornutum (Fucoxanthin) and Scenedesmus spp. (Lutein) [20]. Carotenoids are currently produced on a large scale using the fungi M. circinelloides (β-carotene), bacterium Gordonia jacobea (canthaxanthin), B. trispora (lycopene, β-carotene), C. glutamicum (C-50 carotenoid Decaprenoxanthin), and yeast X. dendrorhous (astaxanthin, syn. Phaffia rhodozyma) [21]. Fungi such as Neurospora crassa, Fusarium sporotrichioides, the bacteria A. aurantiacum, Halobacterium salinarium, and Paracoccus carotinifaciens are also emerging as prospective sources of carotenoids. Several non-carotenogenic microbes, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Blakeslea trispora, Escherichia coli, and X. dendrorhous have been genetically engineered to produce commercially vital carotenoids like lycopene, β-carotene, canthaxanthin, and astaxanthin. Conversely, natural carotenoids have bioactive qualities that may enhance health, and many of them are found in foods consumed by human beings [22]. Having β-carotene-rich meals lowers the risk of cardiovascular/circulatory disease, the world’s leading cause of mortality. Additionally, meals enriched with β-carotene exhibited protection against esophagus cancer [23]. Numerous studies support many health benefits that a diet high in carotenoids may provide, from depression prevention to protection against various forms of cancer [24]. Consuming carotenoids, like lutein and zeaxanthin, was associated with a lower incidence of eye issues and a decreased risk of breast cancer [25]. Because of its strong antioxidant properties, lycopene consumption has been linked to a lower risk of prostate cancer and heart failure [26]. This review presents updates on a number of the latest emerging microbial carotenoid producers. The commercial uses and methods of producing these microbial carotenoids are also discussed.

2. Structure, Categorization and Synthesis of Natural Carotenoids

2.1. Chemistry and Types of Carotenoids

Carotenoids are lipophilic isoprenoids that are categorized based on their molecular and dietary properties. They belong to the chemical classes of xanthophylls and carotenes. The most well-known class of compounds are called carotenes, which include hydrogen and carbon atoms in their chemical structure. Examples of these include α-, β-, γ-, and δ-carotene, as well as torulene. Torularhodin, astaxanthin, and canthaxanthin are examples of the second class of xanthophylls, which also include hydrogen and carbon in their chemical structures [27,28,29]. Carotenoids are a category of hydrocarbons that are created when isoprene molecules with five carbons join together [3,30]. Differentiated structures of carotenoids can be produced by modifying the basic cyclic structure through dehydrogenation, hydrogenation, cyclization, chain shortening or extension, double bond migration, rearrangement, isomerization, oxidation, or combinations of these reactions [10]. Natural carotenoids are present in a broad variety of microorganisms, including cyanobacteria, microalgae, fungi, heterotrophic bacteria, and archaea, in addition to plant sources like tomatoes and carrots [31].
Isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) and its allylic isoenzyme dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) are the two precursor molecules involved in the biosynthesis of carotenoids. The 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) and/or mevalonate (MVA) pathways produce the IPP and DMAPP. The MVA pathway is used by photosynthetic organisms like microalgae and plants, but the MEP pathway is widely used by most bacteria and fungi. Condensation of three IPP and one DMAPP molecule results in the production of a C-20 geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP) molecule, an immediate precursor of carotenoid biosynthesis. Lycopene, a common intermediate for the biosynthesis of nearly all downstream C-40 carotenoids, is then produced [32]. Carotenoids can also be categorized into C-30, C-40, C-45, and C-50 groups based on how many carbons make up each group in their chemical structures. The carotenoids C-40 are among those that are abundant in bacteria, eukaryotic, and archaea [33].
Bacteria and archaea synthesize the C-30 and C-50 carotenoids. On the other hand, only certain types of bacteria can synthesize C-45 carotenoids, which are made up of nine isoprenoid units [9,34]. Figure 1 shows the chemical structures of the most prevalent carotenoids. The majority of carotenoids also have chirality because their molecules contain chiral centres. Carotenoids have chiral centres in their molecules, which contributes to their unique properties. Astaxanthin and zeaxanthin are examples of chiral carotenoids, containing two chiral centers at 3 and 30 carbons due to hydroxyl groups. These carotenoids have two different enantiomers: 3R,3′R and 3S,3′S, as well as 3R,3′S (optically inactive meso form) [35]. In the bioproduction of carotenoids, substrates consisting of sucrose and glucose were the most commonly reported carbon sources [36]. The type and composition of the substrate directly affect the yield of pigments and, consequently, the cost of biotechnological procedures. According to Marova et al., the optimal circumstances for maximum carotenoid yield include high cell growth rates and carbon source availability [37]. Byproducts and raw materials from food and agro-industries are promising substrates for microorganism growth and carotenoid production due to their high nutrient availability, low acquisition cost, and suitability for industrial biotechnological processes (Table 1). Polyhydroxyalkanoates are regarded as suitable replacements for petroleum-derived polymers due to their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and environmental friendliness. Despite these intriguing characteristics, higher manufacturing costs hindered commercial PHA yield. As a result, there is a need to look for alternate renewable feedstocks that can lower overall PHA costs. To make the procedure more cost-effective, research has been undertaken on PHA production using various affordable substrates such as defatted Chlorella biomass, molasses, waste cooking oil, coffee waste, and sugarcane bagasse [38,39,40]. Carotenoids are biological pigments that have numerous biological benefits, including anticancer and antioxidant characteristics. Several carotenoids were in high demand, with astaxanthin topping the list with a high market value. Astaxanthin is a lipophilic natural pigment that is produced by a variety of Paracoccus species. It has been reported that different members of the genus Paracoccus produce diverse carotenoids. Kumar and Kim proposed the co-production of PHA and other valuable metabolites, which could assist in reducing PHA’s high cost [41,42].
Table 1. Agro-industrial residues studied as substrates for carotene production.
Table 1. Agro-industrial residues studied as substrates for carotene production.
SubstrateSpeciesCarotenoids References
Triticum flour, Pennisetum glaucum seed flourPhaffia rhodozymaAstaxanthin[43]
Camelina sativa meal hydrolysatesRhodosporidium toruloidesTotal carotenoids[44]
Carob pulp syrupRhodosporidium toruloidesTotal carotenoids[45]
Water from rice parboilingSporidiobolus salmonicoloβ-carotene[46]
Ultra-filtered wheyRhodotorula acheniorumβ-carotene[47]
sugar beet pulp hydrolysatesRhodotorula mucilaginosa and Rhodotorula toruloidesTotal carotenoids[48]
MolassesRhodotorula mucilaginosaTorulene, torularhodin and β-carotene[49]
PotatoesRhodotorula mucilaginosaβ-carotene[37]
Sugarcane brothRhodotorula rubraTotal carotenoids[50]
Beetroot molassesRhodotorula glutinisβ-carotene, torulene, torularhodin[51]
Residual effluent from potato starchRhodotorula glutinisTorularhodin, torulene and β-carotene[52]
Fermented radish brineRhodotorula glutinisβ-carotene[53]
Corn extractRhodotorula glutinisβ-carotene, torulene, torularhodin[51]
Figure 1. Carotenoids’ chemical structures [54].
Figure 1. Carotenoids’ chemical structures [54].
Microbiolres 15 00111 g001

2.2. Natural Carotenoids Sources

The primary dietary source of carotenoids in the human diet is colourful fruits and vegetables [55]. Additionally, dietary supplements might raise the intake of carotenoids due to their health-promoting qualities. Nowadays, there are a plethora of dietary supplements based on provitamin A (like β-carotene) and non-provitamin A (like zeaxanthin and lutein for eye health) that are produced and marketed primarily by BASF (Ludwigshafen, Germany), OmniActive (Mumbai, India), DSM (Heerlen, The Netherlands), LycoRed Ltd. (Be’er Sheva, Israel), and Chrysantis Inc. (West Chicago, IL, USA) [56,57]. Plants, photosynthetic bacteria, algae, and certain heterotrophic bacteria and fungi are all natural sources of carotenoids [3]. Animals and humans get carotenoids from food because they cannot synthesize them; however, the carotenoids that are obtained can be modified with metabolic reactions for the synthesis of additional carotenoids or their byproducts. Figure 2 summarises the different roles of dietary carotenoids as exogenous antioxidants in the human body. β-carotene is a dominant carotenoid in carrots [58], capsicum pods, sweet potatoes, and green leafy vegetables [32,59,60]. The most prevalent carotenoids found in green leafy vegetables are β-carotene and lutein, followed by violaxanthin and neoxanthin [58,60]. Lactucaxanthin is a protein found only in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), one of the leafy green vegetables [61,62]. Citrus, persimmon, peach, papaya, and capsicum pods have substantial amounts of β-cryptoxanthin in the diet [63]. For all xanthophylls, esterified forms are primarily present in most fruits (≈50–99% of total xanthophylls) and include neoxanthin, lutein, zeaxanthin, and β-cryptoxanthin [64]. Capsicum pods contain mostly xanthophyll esters such as violaxanthin, lutein, zeaxanthin, and keto carotenoids (capsanthin, capsorubin diester) [64,65].

2.2.1. Microorganism

A number of microorganisms from the families Bacterium, Fungi, and Algae can accumulate various forms of carotenoids as metabolic byproducts within their cells.
The group of carotenoids belonging to non-photosynthetic microorganisms is linked to a generative reaction against photo-oxidative stress brought on by environments that are high in light and oxygen [66]. During the last decades, a large number of research groups have made the biotechnological production of carotenoids their top priority. The fact that over 600 of the 750 naturally occurring carotenoids can come from microbes is just suggestive [67]. Plant-derived pigments are challenging to characterize and standardize due to variations in climate conditions and cultivation. The stability and efficacy of these pigments are limited, especially when exposed to high temperatures, light, and pH changes [68].

2.2.2. Carotenoids Produced by Bacteria

Three types of bacteria are known to produce carotenoids: oxygenic, non-phototrophic, and phototrophic [69]. Photosynthetic oxygenic bacteria gather light using bacteriochlorophyll and other carotenoid pigments. It has been determined that the synthesis of more than one hundred distinct carotenoids is caused by over 50 genera and roughly 130 species of phototrophic anoxygenic bacteria. Cyanobacteria synthesize zeaxanthin, β-carotene, canthaxanthin, echinenone, and other carotenoids, making up the majority of oxidative phototrophic bacteria [70]. Nearly all forms of carotenoids, including C-50, C-45, C-40, and C-30 carotenoids, are produced by bacteria. The C-50 carotenoids decaprenoxanthin and its glycosylated derivatives are produced by the bacteria Corynebacterium glutamicum [71]. Gordonia alkanivorans strain IB generates canthaxanthin, astaxanthin, and lutein [72], while Gordonia terrae TWRH01 primarily produces echinenone [73]. To fulfill the enhanced demand for antioxidative protection, carotenoid production is up-regulated in environments with intense light and aerobic conditions [74]. For instance, Spirulina platensis’s ability to synthesize carotenoids was improved in light with high intensity [75], while Flavobacterium sp. produced zeaxanthin in response to high light [76]. Studies involving alphaproteobacteria, such as Rhodobacter species, demonstrated that light [77] and oxygen are the most important regulating factors. Oxygen has been shown to activate the transcription of the crtI-crtB operon [78]. Several regulatory cascades involving sigma factors manage carotenoid biosynthesis. For example, a cascade of RpoE2-RpoH2 and another of RpoE1-RpoH2 regulate the expression of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase, a crucial enzyme responsible for converting farnesyl pyrophosphate into GGPP [79]. The selection of carbon sources has a major impact on carotenogenesis. Even in the presence of oxygen, glucose, and other fermentable carbohydrates are metabolized by Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous via the glycolytic pathway, which is followed by alcoholic fermentation [80]. Studies show that chemotrophic bacteria, including H. salinarum and Rhodopseudomonas spheroides, generate pigments to protect cells from photodamage [81]. Bacteria such as Halobacterium salinarum and Halococcus morrhuae, which produce orange and red colonies, have been explored for their potential biotechnological use in pigment manufacturing [82]. H. salinarum bacterioruberin is the most prevalent carotenoid [83]. Zeaxanthin is efficiently produced by Flavobacterium sp. which is a marine bacterium [84], whereas Haloferax alexandrinus has the potential to produce canthaxanthin in the industrial sector [85]. Due to their diverse colour tones and reduced media requirements, bacterial carotenoids have become a potentially useful source for industrial usage. Commercial applications of bacterial carotenoids are hampered by their manufacturing cost, which remains significantly higher than that of synthetic sources [86]. Improving the production approach of carotenoids-producing bacteria and discovering novel carotenoids result in higher yields and reduced prices.

2.2.3. Carotenoids Produced by Microalgae

Microalgae strains have been the subject of substantial research and are becoming increasingly popular due to the expanding industrial need for natural alternatives, particularly because, under stressed situations, they synthesize unique carotenoids [87]. The environmental variables that affect the production and composition of carotenoids in algae include salinity and nutrients in the growth medium [88,89]. The following carotenoids can be produced by green microalgae: lutein, β-carotene, α-carotene, violaxanthin, neoxanthin, and others. Chlorella contains 93% lutein, 2.6% α- and β-carotene, 1.3% zeaxanthin, 0.2% xanthophylls, and 0.2% β-cryptoxanthin [90]. Arthrospira (Spirulina), Chlorella, Dunaliella salina, and Aphanizomenon flos-aquae are the primary microalgae that are marketed [91]. Microalgae can yield 3–5% of biomass dry weight or 70% of prominent carotenoids, with minor carotenoids remaining in trace amounts [92]. For example, lutein, astaxanthin, β-cryptoxanthin, and other carotenoids comprise the minor sections, but β-carotene makes up 80% of the total carotenoids synthesized by Arthrospira. Although astaxanthin can make up as much as 3% of the dry weight of Haematococcus pluvialis, [93], Dunaliella salina has a high content of β-carotene, making up nearly 8% of its dry biomass [94]. Spirulina is a bacterial microalga, also known as cyanobacteria, produced in several countries, with China being the main producer. Because of its metabolic products, such as phycocyanin, which is utilized as a food ingredient, it is employed economically. Heterotrophic fermentation reactors with sugars in the absence of light are one potential process configuration for the production of spirulina [95]. In an autotrophic process, bicarbonate and air are combined in Chinese production to make CO2, which is then used to produce Spirulina and Chlorella vulgaris [96]. Microalgae are especially regarded as an efficient cell factory for the production of carotenoids because of their strong potential to accumulate carotenoids under specific stress conditions. However, the naturally sluggish development, low cell yields, risk of bacterial and protozoal contamination, wide cultivation area, and high susceptibility to unfavorable weather conditions limited the production capacity. Therefore, enhancement of the microalgal carotenoid breakdown, culture process optimization, and revolt of extraction methods may require additional research [92,97].

2.2.4. Carotenoids Produced by Yeast

Yeasts are another prominent source of carotenoids in microbiology. According to Sanchez et al. (2013), astaxanthin is mostly formed by the yeast X. dendrorhous, while β-carotene is produced by fungi such as B. trispora and Mucor circinelloides [98]. Other carotenoid-producing yeasts such as Sporobolomyces, Sporidioblous, and Rhodoturula only synthesize torularhodin and torulene [2,99]. Several workers have reported about the production of carotenoids by yeasts like Rhodotorula spp. This yeast, which is extensively found in nature, can biosynthesize particular carotenoids in varying amounts, including β-carotene, torulene, and torularhodin [14,100]. The genus Rhodotorula produces different amounts of carotenoids depending on the medium ingredients and environmental factors. Many studies on astaxanthin production have been reported that use the yeast Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous to develop viable biotechnological procedures. Yeasts are therefore trustworthy microbes for producing carotenoids. Knowledge of metabolic engineering tools is also essential for manipulating the biosynthetic pathway for carotenoid production by yeasts. A potential carotenoid synthesis biosynthetic pathway was reported by Simpson et al. in 1964 [101]. After revising the main pathways for carotenoid biosynthesis by yeasts, Goodwin came to the conclusion that there are three general phases in the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway [102,103].
(1)
HMG-CoA synthase catalyses the conversion of acetyl CoA to 3-hidroxy-3-methyl glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA), which is the first step in the synthesis process. Next, mevalonic acid (MVA), the first precursor of the terpenoid biosynthesis pathway, is produced by the conversion of HMG-CoA. MVA kinase and decarboxylation phosphorylate MVA, resulting in isopentenyl pyrophosphate.
(2)
Prenyl transferase catalyses the isomerization of IPP to dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP), where three IPP molecules are added to create geranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP). The process begins with the condensation of two GGPP molecules to make phytoene, the pathway’s initial C40 carotene. Lycopene is next formed by desaturation of phytoene.
(3)
Lycopene undergoes several reactions that yield various cyclic carotenoids, such as β-carotene, γ-carotene, astaxanthin, torulahodin, and torulene.
Many studies show that utilising by-products as carbon sources can make carotenoid synthesis by yeasts industrially viable [104]. This also reduces environmental issues associated with waste and effluent emissions [105]. Research indicates that Rhodotorula glutinis 22P and Lactobacillus helveticus 12A produced carotenoids at a yield of approximately 8.4 mg/L [106]. Additionally, Phaffia rhodozyma displayed the highest yield of astaxanthin and β-carotene [107]. Many factors influence the synthesis of carotenoids in yeast. Certain red yeasts have β- and γ-carotene predominating at low temperatures, whereas torulene and torulularhodin develop more readily at higher temperatures [108]. The type of carbon and nitrogen sources in yeast has an unpredictable impact on the synthesis of carotenoids [109].

2.2.5. Carotenoids Produced by Fungi

Fungi inherited the ability to synthesise carotenoids from archaea as members of the Archaea-Eukarya lineage [110]. Thus, all fungal phyla contain species that contain carotenoids. Species that generate β-carotene [111,112] and resemble the C40-pathway in the class Halobacteria are common to all fungal groupings [113]. Furthermore, unique changes in β-carotene and its precursors through oxygenation have evolved in fungi. The crtYB fusion gene is characteristic of fungal carotenogenesis [114]. As demonstrated by Sulfolobus solfaticus [115], it originated from the co-transcribed overlapping genes of crtY and crtB in Archaea, where they are arranged in a gene cluster. Fungi have been producing pigments for hundreds of years [116]. Monascus purpureus, an ascomycete, is named after the reddish colour of rice tainted with the fungus [117]. Monascus can produce yellow, orange, or red pigments; the red pigments are more desirable for commercial uses [118]. In a submerged culture containing sugar and molasses, a Czech Republic-based business discovered a red-coloured Penicillium oxalicum [119]. A major barrier to the industrial application of fungi is the potential for co-production of mycotoxin. For instance, Fusarium species, which yield lycopene and β-carotene, have the potential to produce mycotoxins based on their growth conditions. In contrast, Neurospora intermedia pigment production does not result in the concurrent generation of mycotoxins, making it safe for human consumption [120]. The benefits of using fungi as sources include: (1) A wide range of nutrients, such as carbon sources (including potato extracts and maize stalk hydrolysate) and various inorganic and organic nitrogen sources. It complies with the current processing paradigm of high efficiency and environmental preservation. (2) The carotenoid process that fungi create is short-cycle, easily recyclable, and unaffected by climate. Furthermore, with high production efficiency, the fungus may continuously ferment carotenoids. (3) There are several by-products from the fungal fermentation broth, including protein, amino acids, fat, carbohydrates, and others, which can be used and developed further [121].

3. The Biological Activities of Carotenoid

Carotenoids are decisive structural components of the photosynthetic machinery that protect cells from photo-oxidative damage. They also have an ecological role by attracting pollinators and seed dispersers due to their different colours in fruits, flowers, and leaves. Certain carotenoids, such as violaxanthin and neoxanthin, serve as building blocks for the manufacture of the plant hormones strigolactone and abscisic acid (ABA) [122,123]. Provitamin A activity is the capacity of carotenoids to utilise carotene dioxygenase to produce vitamin A (retinal and retinol) [124]. To provide vitamin A activity, any carotenoid with at least one unaltered β-ionone ring can be cleaved down [125]. Provitamin A active carotenoids are β-carotene, α-carotene, γ-carotene, and β-cryptoxanthin. Because β-carotene has two β-ionone rings, it has 100% provitamin A activity, but lycopene has no β-ionone rings, hence it has no provitamin A activity. The biological characteristics of the carotenoid should ultimately be preserved, regardless of the architecture of the industrial facility, as biologically active carotenoids contain a variety of intriguing characteristics and roles that are vital to human health. Carotenoids and foods high in carotenoid content have been linked to several health advantages [126]. The prominent functions among these health benefits are retinoid precursors (such as vitamin A), antioxidant potential and free radical scavenging activity, immune system stimulation, and actions that prevent cancer and sunburn reactions [10]. Furthermore, because carotenoids protect against different reactive oxygen species (ROS), they are being proposed as preventive agents against diseases of the nervous system, the cardiovascular system, and the photosensitive, and neurological systems. The precise mechanisms underlying the bioavailability, absorption, transport, metabolism, and storage of carotenoids, as well as the variables that influence these processes, remain incompletely understood [18,127]. Out of all the known carotenoids, about 50 are precursors of retinoids, like vitamin A, with at least one unsubstituted β-ionone ring and a polyene side chain with at least 11 carbons. Ninety percent of vitamin A in the human body is found in the liver. About 40% of this is immediately utilized, with the remaining 40% being conserved. Thus, after consumption, provitamin A-containing carotenoids are absorbed and transformed in the gut into retinal, which is then transformed into retinol and transferred to the liver for storage [128]. Carotenoids have a wide range of antioxidant activity because they have numerous ways to counteract the effects of ROS. Naguib (2000) found that astaxanthin has stronger antioxidant activity than α-carotene, β-carotene, lutein, and lycopene [129]. Additionally, carotenoids are necessary for the maintenance and functioning of biological processes such as immunity, reproduction, and eyesight [130,131]. For instance, β-carotene enhances immune system performance and aids in the healthy operation of the reproductive system by shielding cells from free radicals [132]. The simultaneous pro-vitamin A and antioxidant properties are attributed to the structure of torulene, β-carotene, torulenehodin, and lycopene [52]. It is key to note, nevertheless, that carotenoids may not always be advantageous to humans. In particular, excessive and extended consumption of carotenoids, such as canthaxanthin, for cutaneous photoprotection (i.e., sunless tanning products) and cosmetic skin colouration can result in macular (eye) crystal deposition, according to reports from Geoffrey and Felix (1991) and Baker (2001) [133,134]. Table 2 lists several international commercial producers of microbial carotenoids along with their products.

4. Identification, Purification and Extraction of Carotenoids

Identification of any biosubstance can be done by physical methods (spectral) and/or chemical. Carotenoids can be identified by their ability to react with particular reactions in ways specific to their various functional groups. The functional groups ether (–O–), hydroxyl (–OH), carbonyl (C=O), ester (–COOR), carboxyl (–COOH), anhydride (–CO)2O, nitrile (–C≡N), nitro (–NO2), amide (–CONH2), nitrozo (–N=O), azo (–N=N–), amine (–NH2), etc., can be identified through a series of procedures and chemical reactions. The primary attribute of carotenoids is their absorption spectrum, which is determined by their chromophore. Determining the absorption spectrum of carotenoids in visible light and various solvents is the most crucial step in the identification process. The absorption characteristics are investigated using TLC or column chromatography. Carotenoids can also be identified chemically via colour reactions, which identify the various functional groups in the pigment molecule. Methods for precisely determining some of the distinctive physical properties of carotenoids (such as NMR spectra, optical spectra, and electric spin resonance spectra) were refined through the advancement of experimental and theoretical physics and its various branches, such as magnetism, nuclear physics, atomic physics, optics, etc. Optical spectra, electric spin, NMR spectra, resonance spectra, and other precisely determined physical properties of carotenoids were made possible by advancements in theoretical and experimental physics and its various branches, such as optics, magnetism, atomic physics, nuclear physics, etc. Physical methods are utilized to study the various physical states of organic molecules in relation to their behaviour towards various physical agents used in the study, such as electromagnetic radiations, beams of elementary particles, magnetic fields, polarized light, etc. The basis of spectral approaches is the way electromagnetic radiation interacts with carotenoid molecules, which can absorb energy at various wavelengths. The majority of studies involving carotenoid extraction and purification were conducted on a laboratory scale [135]. A reliable, simple, and moderate saponification technique was created to quantify the carotenoids in plant material. Using a strongly basic resin, the chlorophylls and esterified fatty acids are selectively removed from the organic phase during the extraction process using acetone. HPLC was used to determine the primary carotenoid concentration of extracts from common plant material before and after the action of basic resin. Organic polar solvents such as acetone, dichloromethane, ethylic alcohol, methylic alcohol, dimethyl sulphoxide, and mixtures of solvents (diethyl ether/ethylic alcohol, hexane/acetone/dichloromethane/methylic alcohol/ethylic alcohol, acetone/methylic alcohol) are used for the extraction of carotenoids from the samples and their solubilization, regardless of the extraction method [136]. The fermentation process is followed by separation and purification methods to recover the pigments, and these usually represent the major production costs. After the extraction methods are set according to the characteristics of the sample, procedures to obtain the pure carotenoid are followed [137]. The technique of TLC is applied in the purification and isolation of carotenoids. When compared to column chromatography, this approach offers a higher degree of purification. The mobile phase, plate elution system, and stationary phase are selected based on the carotenoid’s characteristics [135]. Although the evolution of biotechnology contributed to the optimization of the synthesis of carotenoids, there is still a need for research to improve the process efficiency and commercial gain. Breaking the cell is required to release the intracellular carotenoids and extract their constituent parts [36]. Due to the molecule’s extreme sensitivity when removed from its surroundings, retrieving the extracted chemicals with the least amount of damage becomes difficult at this point [138]. Organic solvents are utilized in carotenoid extraction techniques in order to disperse the substances. Acetone, chloroform, dichloromethane, hexane, cyclohexane, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, benzene, carbon disulfide, diethyl ether, and the recently published Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE) method with carbon dioxide are the most often used solvents. Conventional purification methods include differential extraction, countercurrent extraction, adsorption column chromatography, and differential crystallization [10]. Chromatography techniques, in conjunction with other techniques that enhance selectivity and separation efficiency, were employed in the majority of carotenoid research. Liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is a viable method for the identification and purification of carotenoids [139,140,141]. This method involves comparing the mass spectra with standards or databases. If these are not accessible, the results can be improved by combining the methods of UV-VIS Photodiode Array (PDA) and Diode Array Detectors (DAD) with LC-MS/MS chromatography [142].
Three distinct coloured pigments are produced by Micrococcus bacteria: yellow, green, and red. The primary pigments of Micrococcus roseus have been identified through purification using an HPLC system, and mass spectra have been utilized to ascertain the molecular weight of the samples. Samples were subjected to controlled eluting with 80–100% ethanol at 470 nm using a photodiode detector on a C-18 column. β-carotene was the primary carotenoid found [143]. The pigments of the yeast R. glutinis and the bacteria Micrococcus luteus were purified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with the aid of binary solvents, such as tert-butyl ether and ethyl-methyl ether. The samples were first filtered through a 0.2 µm cellulose filter and the reverse polymer phase C-30 at 10 °C. Using apo-CAR as an internal standard and a PDA, the compounds of interest were found and identified. Important carotenoids, such as cis and trans isomers, might be identified [144]. The composition of the carotenoids in a mutant strain of Paracoccus sp. called TSAO538 was examined using reverse phase HPLC, a Sherisorb ODS2 column, diode detectors, and a solvent that contained equal parts ethyl acetate, acetonitrile, and water. This strain is capable of selectively synthesising canthaxanthin. Kieselgel 60 F254 silica plates were subjected to TLC using diethyl ether, hexane, or ethyl acetate. Redistilled acetone and diethyl ether were used to record the absorption spectra using a UV/VIS spectrophotometer. A mass spectrometry analysis was then carried out [145]. Recombinant enzymes have been employed by researchers to release precursors of carotenoid pigments, which have been detected using Gas Chromatography-Flame Ionisation Detector (GC-FID) and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) and further examined using HPLC-DAD and HPLC-MS [146]. Separation and purification procedures for analysing carotenoids are well known. However, future research should concentrate on developing cheaply scaled-up purifying techniques, as they are critical to industrial production [147].

5. Carotenoids’ Impact on Human Health

Carotenoids are known to be extremely significant substances for human health. Fruits, vegetables, and whole grains contain high levels of antioxidant compounds such as polyphenolic acids, ascorbic acid, carotenoids, and tocopherols which reduce the risk of many chronic diseases such as T2D, neurodegenerative disorders, CVDs, and various types of cancer [148]. Proinflammatory mediators such as circulating proinflammatory cytokines, oxidised phospholipids, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), inflammatory-stimulating prostaglandin E2, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells, and C-reactive protein are generally associated with elevated levels of these chronic diseases. Carotenoids’ antioxidant characteristics allow them to modulate the amounts of these mediators by nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2 or oxidative stress modulation and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-mediated overexpression of antioxidant and cytoprotective Phase II enzymes [149,150,151,152]. Overexposure to oxidative stress promotes bone resorption and inhibits bone formation, increasing the risk of osteoporosis and bone loss. Carotenoids’ antioxidant qualities, however, might contribute to better bone health [153]. Age-related reductions in muscle mass and strength (attributed primarily to a lack of exercise, vitamin D, or dietary protein) were linked to poor physical function and other problems. A diet high in antioxidants, such as carotenoids, could mitigate the age-related loss of muscle and physical function. In the Framingham offspring prospective cohort study among elder participants (average age of 61 years), higher intakes of total carotenoids zeaxanthin/lutein, and lycopene were related to an enhanced annualized change in faster gait speed and grip strength [154]. The zeaxanthin, meso-zeaxanthin, and xanthophylls lutein, accumulate as macular pigment in the fovea and inner plexiform layer of the retina in humans, which protects the retinal membrane against the damaging effects of short-wavelength high-intensity light and enhances visual acuity. Remarkably, it has been demonstrated that low-density lipoproteins and high-density lipoproteins mediate the selective uptake of lutein and zeaxanthin in the human retina. Epidemiological and clinical studies have witnessed the critical role of dietary zeaxanthin/lutein in lowering the risk of age-related macular degeneration [155]. Carotenoids are frequently utilized in cosmetics, primarily for their UV-protective properties. Furthermore, Carotenoids have the potential to improve skin characteristics. According to a comprehensive evaluation of 11 clinical studies, supplementing with astaxanthin at a dose of 3 to 6 mg/d for 2 to 16 weeks enhanced the moisture content, texture, and appearance of wrinkles on the skin [156,157].
Carotenoids protect against oxidative stress and inflammation by quenching singlet oxygen, oxidising, isomerizing, and scavenging free radicals [158,159]. Beyond their antioxidant properties, carotenoids may also directly support the immune system [160], shield skin from UV ray damage [161], and fight against certain types of cancer [162,163] (Figure 3). They can avert a vitamin A deficiency, which is recognized as the necessary substance for fostering development, embryonic development, and visual function. Carotenoids’ subcellular distribution is determined by their lipophilicity; they are concentrated in lipid droplets and other lipophilic compartments, such as membranes [164]. Carotenoids are thought to act as antioxidants to shield membranes. Polar carotenoids also can control membrane fluidity [165,166]. The effectiveness of using carotenoids in the prevention and treatment of several chronic illnesses is well established. long-term illnesses. They have anti-inflammatory qualities and can stimulate an organism’s immune system.
Research has demonstrated that consuming foods high in lycopene may reduce the incidence of atherosclerosis and other cardiovascular conditions [167,168,169]. The potential of lycopene to modify high-density lipoprotein functioning and diminish systemic and high-density lipoprotein-associated inflammation is most likely responsible for these beneficial effects [170]. Additionally, studies have shown that astaxanthin can prevent atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases by lowering oxidative stress and inflammation and improving glucose and lipid metabolism [171]. Providing the body with astaxanthin enables us to efficiently mitigate the adverse consequences arising from the oxidation and breakdown of cellular components. Lycopene may inhibit the release of chemokines and pro-inflammatory cytokines, according to a different study [172]. Carotenoids protect the retina by preventing cataracts and age-related macular degeneration [173,174]. There is concrete proof of lutein and zeaxanthin’s beneficial effects on eye health. In addition to improving visual performance and having good side effects like contrast sensitivity, glare tolerance, and photo-stress recovery, they may lower the incidence of age-related macular eye illnesses. β-Carotene and lutein have been shown to improve cognitive function [175]. Research has also been done on lycopene’s possible benefits for treating neurological illnesses like Alzheimer’s disease [170,176]. Due to its strong antioxidant activity, torularhominos can be employed as a neuroprotective drug against H2O2-induced oxidative stress. It was previously believed that lutein may be associated with the potential regulation of inflammation-related neurodegenerative illnesses [177]. Humans with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease showed protection from lycopene [169]. Carotenoids are being promoted by organizations like the International Carotenoid Society, but more studies and practical science on the health benefits of carotenoids in humans and animals need to be supported by all stakeholders involved.

6. Future Perspective

Carotenoids produced by microorganisms are popular in the commercial market due to their natural origin, vibrant hues, and ease of cultivation with shorter production times. The microorganism’s capacity to break down agro-industrial waste lowers the total cost of carotenoids’ synthesis. Low carotenoid content, safety issues with specific opportunistic infections that produce carotenoids, and consumer acceptance of microbial carotenoids frequently necessitate meticulous testing are further obstacles to microbial carotenoid production. Therefore, for the commercial production of microbial carotenoids, process optimization of the industrial-scale carotenoid production is required. The key elements of the production, extraction, and commercialization stages were covered in this broad review of the state-of-the-art microbial carotenoid technology. It is obvious that naturally occurring carotenoids obtained through biotechnological processes are becoming more and more popular due to their advantageous health effects and (bio)nature, progressively displacing the already used synthetic carotenoids. Thus, there is a lot of room for growth and potential for carotenoids produced by microorganisms in the global food and pharmaceutical industries. However, there are still processing industrial obstacles to be addressed, such as the high cost of the current technologies used to produce and extract carotenoids on an industrial scale or the need to use a lot of non-benign solvents as extract agents. Scientific research advancements have the potential to enhance the quality and value of microbial carotenoids, rendering this domain and market appealing to multiple biotechnological sectors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.K. and M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, C.S.; Writing—review and editing, P.K. and M.K.; supervision, P.K. and M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to their respective authorities, departments, institutions and universities for their support and cooperation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Alcaíno, J.; Baeza, M.; Cifuentes, V. Carotenoid distribution in nature. Carotenoids Nat. Biosynth. Regul. Funct. 2016, 79, 3–33. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cardoso, L.A.; Karp, S.G.; Vendruscolo, F.; Kanno, K.Y.; Zoz, L.I.; Carvalho, J.C. Biotechnological production of carotenoids and their applications in food and pharmaceutical products. Carotenoids 2017, 8, 125–141. [Google Scholar]
  3. Maoka, T. Carotenoids as natural functional pigments. J. Nat. Med. 2020, 74, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stafsnes, M.H.; Josefsen, K.D.; Kildahl-Andersen, G.; Valla, S.; Ellingsen, T.E.; Bruheim, P. Isolation and characterization of marine pigmented bacteria from Norwegian coastal waters and screening for carotenoids with UVA-blue light absorbing properties. J. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Christaki, E.; Bonos, E.; Giannenas, I.; Florou-Paneri, P. Functional properties of carotenoids originating from algae. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Amorim-Carrilho, K.T.; Cepeda, A.; Fente, C.; Regal, P. Review of methods for analysis of carotenoids. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2014, 56, 49–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mata-Gómez, L.C.; Montañez, J.C.; Méndez-Zavala, A.; Aguilar, C.N. Biotechnological production of carotenoids by yeasts: An overview. Microb. Cell Factories 2014, 13, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alexandri, M.; Kachrimanidou, V.; Papapostolou, H.; Papadaki, A.; Kopsahelis, N. Sustainable food systems: The case of functional compounds towards the development of clean label food products. Foods 2022, 11, 2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yabuzaki, J. Carotenoids Database: Structures, chemical fingerprints and distribution among organisms. Database 2017, 2017, bax004. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mezzomo, N.; Ferreira, S.R. Carotenoids functionality, sources, and processing by supercritical technology: A review. J. Chem. 2016, 2016, 3164312. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bhosale, P. Environmental and cultural stimulants in the production of carotenoids from microorganisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 63, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sandmann, G. Carotenoid biosynthesis and biotechnological application. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2001, 385, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, Y.S.; Wu, J.Y. Optimization of cell growth and carotenoid production of Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous through statistical experiment design. Biochem. Eng. J. 2007, 36, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tinoi, J.; Rakariyatham, N.; Deming, R.L. Simplex optimization of carotenoid production by Rhodotorula glutinis using hydrolyzed mung bean waste flour as substrate. Process Biochem. 2005, 40, 2551–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gultekin, F.; Doguc, D.K. Allergic and immunologic reactions to food additives. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2013, 45, 6–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Capelli, B.; Bagchi, D.; Cysewski, G.R. Synthetic astaxanthin is significantly inferior to algal-based astaxanthin as an antioxidant and may not be suitable as a human nutraceutical supplement. Nutrafoods 2013, 12, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brauch, J.E. Underutilized fruits and vegetables as potential novel pigment sources. In Handbook on Natural Pigments in Food and Beverages; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2016; pp. 305–335. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fiedor, J.; Burda, K. Potential role of carotenoids as antioxidants in human health and disease. Nutrients 2014, 6, 466–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hegde, P.S.; Agni, M.B.; Rai, P.; KM, D.G. Impact of carotenoids on gut microbiome: Implications in human health and disease. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2022, 14, 1085–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. McWilliams, A. The Global Market for Carotenoids; FOD025F; BCC Research: Boston, MA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. Singh, O.V. (Ed.) Bio-Pigmentation and Biotechnological Implementations; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hsu, B.Y.; Pu, Y.S.; Inbaraj, B.S.; Chen, B.H. An improved high performance liquid chromatography–diode array detection–mass spectrometry method for determination of carotenoids and their precursors phytoene and phytofluene in human serum. J. Chromatogr. B 2012, 899, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Woodside, J.V.; McGrath, A.J.; Lyner, N.; McKinley, M.C. Carotenoids and health in older people. Maturitas 2015, 80, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Obana, A.; Asaoka, R.; Miura, A.; Nozue, M.; Takayanagi, Y.; Nakamura, M. Improving skin carotenoid levels in young students through brief dietary education using the Veggie Meter. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Eliassen, A.H.; Hendrickson, S.J.; Brinton, L.A.; Buring, J.E.; Campos, H.; Dai, Q.; Dorgan, J.F.; Franke, A.A.; Gao, Y.T.; Goodman, M.T.; et al. Circulating carotenoids and risk of breast cancer: Pooled analysis of eight prospective studies. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2012, 104, 1905–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jampani, C.; Raghavarao, K.S.M.S. Process integration for purification and concentration of red cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) anthocyanins. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 141, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Delgado-Pelayo, R.; Gallardo-Guerrero, L.; Hornero-Méndez, D. Carotenoid composition of strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo L.) fruits. Food Chem. 2016, 199, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cataldo, V.; Arenas, N.; López, J.; Camilo, C.; Agosin, E. Sustainable Production of β-Xanthophylls in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae; ECI Symposium Series; WV, USA, 2018; Available online: https://dc.engconfintl.org/microbial/11 (accessed on 23 July 2024).
  29. Colmán-Martínez, M.; Martínez-Huélamo, M.; Miralles, E.; Estruch, R.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. A new method to simultaneously quantify the antioxidants: Carotenes, xanthophylls, and vitamin A in human plasma. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 9268531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Domonkos, I.; Kis, M.; Gombos, Z.; Ughy, B. Carotenoids, versatile components of oxygenic photosynthesis. Prog. Lipid Res. 2013, 52, 539–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Galasso, C.; Corinaldesi, C.; Sansone, C. Carotenoids from marine organisms: Biological functions and industrial applications. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Saini, R.K.; Keum, Y.S. Microbial platforms to produce commercially vital carotenoids at industrial scale: An updated review of critical issues. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 46, 657–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fernandes, A.S.; do Nascimento, T.C.; Jacob-Lopes, E.; De Rosso, V.V.; Zepka, L.Q. Carotenoids: A brief overview on its structure, biosynthesis, synthesis, and applications. Prog. Carotenoid Res. 2018, 1, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  34. Foong, L.C.; Loh, C.W.L.; Ng, H.S.; Lan, J.C.W. Recent development in the production strategies of microbial carotenoids. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 37, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liaaen-Jensen, S. Basic carotenoid chemistry. Oxidative Stress Dis. 2004, 13, 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  36. Valduga, E.; Tatsch, P.; Vanzo, L.T.; Rauber, F.; Di Luccio, M.; Treichel, H. Assessment of hydrolysis of cheese whey and use of hydrolysate for bioproduction of carotenoids by Sporidiobolus salmonicolor CBS 2636. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 1060–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Marova, I.; Carnecka, M.; Halienova, A.; Certik, M.; Dvorakova, T.; Haronikova, A. Use of several waste substrates for carotenoid-rich yeast biomass production. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 95, S338–S342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sawant, S.S.; Salunke, B.K.; Kim, B.S. Degradation of corn stover by fungal cellulase cocktail for production of polyhydroxyalkanoates by moderate halophile Paracoccus sp. LL1. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 194, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Dalsasso, R.R.; Pavan, F.A.; Bordignon, S.E.; de Aragão, G.M.F.; Poletto, P. Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) production by Cupriavidus necator from sugarcane vinasse and molasses as mixed substrate. Process Biochem. 2019, 85, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khomlaem, C.; Aloui, H.; Oh, W.G.; Kim, B.S. High cell density culture of Paracoccus sp. LL1 in membrane bioreactor for enhanced co-production of polyhydroxyalkanoates and astaxanthin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 192, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Takaichi, S.; Mochimaru, M. Carotenoids and carotenogenesis in cyanobacteria: Unique ketocarotenoids and carotenoid glycosides. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2007, 64, 2607–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kumar, P.; Kim, B.S. Paracoccus sp. strain LL1 as a single cell factory for the conversion of waste cooking oil to polyhydroxyalkanoates and carotenoids. Appl. Food Biotechnol. 2019, 6, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  43. Bhatt, P.C.; Ahmad, M.; Panda, B.P. Enhanced bioaccumulation of astaxanthin in Phaffia rhodozyma by utilising low-cost agro products as fermentation substrate. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2013, 2, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bertacchi, S.; Bettiga, M.; Porro, D.; Branduardi, P. Camelina sativa meal hydrolysate as sustainable biomass for the production of carotenoids by Rhodosporidium toruloides. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2020, 13, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Martins, V.; Dias, C.; Caldeira, J.; Duarte, L.C.; Reis, A.; da Silva, T.L. Carob pulp syrup: A potential Mediterranean carbon source for carotenoids production by Rhodosporidium toruloides NCYC 921. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2018, 3, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Colet, R.; Urnau, L.; Bampi, J.; Zeni, J.; Dias, B.B.; Rodrigues, E.; Jacques, R.A.; Di Luccio, M.; Valduga, E. Use of low-cost agro products as substrate in semi-continuous process to obtain carotenoids by Sporidiobolus salmonicolor. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2017, 11, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nasrabadi, M.R.N.; Razavi, S.H. Optimization of β-carotene production by a mutant of the lactose-positive yeast Rhodotorula acheniorum from whey ultrafiltrate. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 20, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Martins, L.C.; Palma, M.; Angelov, A.; Nevoigt, E.; Liebl, W.; Sá-Correia, I. Complete utilization of the major carbon sources present in sugar beet pulp hydrolysates by the oleaginous red yeasts Rhodotorula toruloides and R. mucilaginosa. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Cheng, Y.T.; Yang, C.F. Using strain Rhodotorula mucilaginosa to produce carotenoids using food wastes. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2016, 61, 270–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bonadio, M.D.P.; Freita, L.A.D.; Mutton, M.J.R. Carotenoid production in sugarcane juice and synthetic media supplemented with nutrients by Rhodotorula rubra l02. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2018, 49, 872–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Buzzini, P.; Martini, A. Production of carotenoids by strains of Rhodotorula glutinis cultured in raw materials of agro-industrial origin. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 71, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kot, A.M.; Błażejak, S.; Kurcz, A.; Gientka, I.; Kieliszek, M. Rhodotorula glutinis—Potential source of lipids, carotenoids, and enzymes for use in industries. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 6103–6117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Malisorn, C.; Suntornsuk, W. Improved β-carotene production of Rhodotorula glutinis in fermented radish brine by continuous cultivation. Biochem. Eng. J. 2009, 43, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, C.; Chen, X.; Too, H.P. Microbial astaxanthin biosynthesis: Recent achievements, challenges, and commercialization outlook. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 5725–5737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Meléndez-Martínez, A.J.; Mandić, A.I.; Bantis, F.; Böhm, V.; Borge, G.I.A.; Brnčić, M.; Bysted, A.; Cano, M.P.; Dias, M.G.; Elgersma, A.; et al. A comprehensive review on carotenoids in foods and feeds: Status quo, applications, patents, and research needs. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 1999–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Mussagy, C.U.; Khan, S.; Kot, A.M. Current developments on the application of microbial carotenoids as an alternative to synthetic pigments. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 62, 6932–6946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Novoveska, L.; Ross, M.E.; Stanley, M.S.; Pradelles, R.; Wasiolek, V.; Sassi, J.F. Microalgal carotenoids: A review of production, current markets, regulations, and future direction. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dias, M.G.; Olmedilla-Alonso, B.; Hornero-Méndez, D.; Mercadante, A.Z.; Osorio, C.; Vargas-Murga, L.; Meléndez-Martínez, A.J. Comprehensive database of carotenoid contents in ibero-american foods. A valuable tool in the context of functional foods and the establishment of recommended intakes of bioactives. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 5055–5107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Saini, R.K.; Keum, Y.S. Carotenoid extraction methods: A review of recent developments. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 90–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Saini, R.K.; Shang, X.M.; Ko, E.Y.; Choi, J.H.; Kim, D.; Keum, Y.S. Characterization of nutritionally important phytoconstituents in minimally processed ready-to-eat baby-leaf vegetables using HPLC-DAD and GC-MS. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2016, 10, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kim, D.E.; Shang, X.; Assefa, A.D.; Keum, Y.S.; Saini, R.K. Metabolite profiling of green, green/red, and red lettuce cultivars: Variation in health beneficial compounds and antioxidant potential. Food Res. Int. 2018, 105, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Saini, R.K.; Moon, S.H.; Gansukh, E.; Keum, Y.S. An efficient one-step scheme for the purification of major xanthophyll carotenoids from lettuce, and assessment of their comparative anticancer potential. Food Chem. 2018, 266, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rowles, J.L., III; Erdman, J.W., Jr. Carotenoids and their role in cancer prevention. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2020, 1865, 158613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mariutti, L.R.; Mercadante, A.Z. Carotenoid esters analysis and occurrence: What do we know so far? Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2018, 648, 36–43. [Google Scholar]
  65. Mohd Hassan, N.; Yusof, N.A.; Yahaya, A.F.; Mohd Rozali, N.N.; Othman, R. Carotenoids of capsicum fruits: Pigment profile and health-promoting functional attributes. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ashokkumar, V.; Flora, G.; Sevanan, M.; Sripriya, R.; Chen, W.H.; Park, J.H.; Kumar, G. Technological advances in the production of carotenoids and their applications–A critical review. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 367, 128215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Demain, A.L.; Sánchez, S. Advancement of biotechnology by genetic modifications. Microb. Carotenoids Methods Protoc. 2018, 1852, 1–43. [Google Scholar]
  68. Gupta, I.; Adin, S.N.; Panda, B.P.; Mujeeb, M. β-Carotene—Production methods, biosynthesis from Phaffia rhodozyma, factors affecting its production during fermentation, pharmacological properties: A review. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2022, 69, 2517–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Schweiggert, R.M.; Carle, R. Carotenoid production by bacteria, microalgae, and fungi. Carotenoids Nutr. Anal. Technol. 2016, 217–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liang, M.H.; Zhu, J.; Jiang, J.G. Carotenoids biosynthesis and cleavage related genes from bacteria to plants. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 2314–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Heider, S.A.; Peters-Wendisch, P.; Netzer, R.; Stafnes, M.; Brautaset, T.; Wendisch, V.F. Production and glucosylation of C 50 and C 40 carotenoids by metabolically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 1223–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Silva, T.P.; Paixao, S.M.; Alves, L. Ability of Gordonia alkanivorans strain 1B for high added value carotenoids production. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 58055–58063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Loh, W.L.C.; Huang, K.C.; Ng, H.S.; Lan, J.C.W. Exploring the fermentation characteristics of a newly isolated marine bacteria strain, Gordonia terrae TWRH01 for carotenoids production. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2020, 130, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sandmann, G. Genes and Pathway Reactions Related to Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Purple Bacteria. Biology 2023, 12, 1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Liu, H.I. Effects of temperature and light intensity on growth rate, physiological and biochemical characteristics of Spirulina platensis. Zhonghua Nongye Yanjiu 1984, 33, 276–291. [Google Scholar]
  76. Arakawa, Y.; Hashimoto, K.; Shibata, A.; Umezu, M. Studies on the biosynthesis of carotenoids by microorganism. II. Effect of Visible Light on the Growth and Carotenoids Production of Flavobacterium sp. TK-70. Hakko Kogaku Kaishi 1977, 55, 319–324. [Google Scholar]
  77. Shneour, E.A. Carotenoid pigment conversion in Rhodopseudomonas spheroides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1962, 62, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Lang, H.P.; Cogdell, R.J.; Gardiner, A.T.; Hunter, C.N. Early steps in carotenoid biosynthesis: Sequences and transcriptional analysis of the crtI and crtB genes of Rhodobacter sphaeroides and overexpression and reactivation of crtI in Escherichia coli and R. sphaeroides. J. Bacteriol. 1994, 176, 3859–3869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Mishra, S.; Singh Chanotiya, C.; Shanker, K.; Kumar Tripathi, A. Characterization of carotenoids and genes encoding their biosynthetic pathways in Azospirillum brasilense. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2021, 368, fnab025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Córdova, P.; Baeza, M.; Cifuentes, V.; Alcaíno, J. Microbiological synthesis of carotenoids: Pathways and regulation. In Progress in Carotenoid Research; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  81. Dundas, I.D.; Larsen, H. The physiological role of the carotenoid pigments of Halobacterium salinarium. Arch. Für Mikrobiol. 1962, 44, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Grant, W.D.; Larsen, H. Extremely halophilic archaeobacteria, order Halobacteriales ord. nov. Bergey’s Man. Syst. Bacteriol. 1989, 3, 2216–2233. [Google Scholar]
  83. Asker, D.; Ohta, Y. Production of canthaxanthin by extremely halophilic bacteria. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 1999, 88, 617–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Masetto, A.; Flores-Cotera, L.B.; Díaz, C.; Langley, E.; Sanchez, S. Application of a complete factorial design for the production of zeaxanthin by Flavobacterium sp. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2001, 92, 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Asker, D.; Awad, T.; Ohta, Y. Lipids of Haloferax alexandrinus strain TMT: An extremely halophilic canthaxanthin-producing archaeon. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2002, 93, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ram, S.; Mitra, M.; Shah, F.; Tirkey, S.R.; Mishra, S. Bacteria as an alternate biofactory for carotenoid production: A review of its applications, opportunities and challenges. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 67, 103867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gateau, H.; Solymosi, K.; Marchand, J.; Schoefs, B. Carotenoids of microalgae used in food industry and medicine. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 1140–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. D’Alessandro, E.B.; Antoniosi Filho, N.R. Concepts and studies on lipid and pigments of microalgae: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 58, 832–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Beihui, L.; Kun, L.Y. In vitro biosynthesis of xanthophylls by cell extractsof a green alga Chlorococcum. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2001, 39, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Inbaraj, B.S.; Chien, J.T.; Chen, B.H. Improved high performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of carotenoids in the microalga Chlorella pyrenoidosa. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1102, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Spolaore, P.; Joannis-Cassan, C.; Duran, E.; Isambert, A. Commercial applications of microalgae. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2006, 101, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Guedes, A.C.; Amaro, H.M.; Malcata, F.X. Microalgae as sources of carotenoids. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 625–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Raposo, M.F.D.J.; Morais, A.M.M.B.D.; Morais, R.M.S.C.D. Carotenoids from marine microalgae: A valuable natural source for the prevention of chronic diseases. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 5128–5155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Morowvat, M.H.; Ghasemi, Y. Culture medium optimization for enhanced β-carotene and biomass production by Dunaliella salina in mixotrophic culture. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2016, 7, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lu, Y.M.; Xiang, W.Z.; Wen, Y.H. Spirulina (Arthrospira) industry in Inner Mongolia of China: Current status and prospects. J. Appl. Phycol. 2011, 23, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Benemann, J.R.; Zhang, X.; Hu, H.; Qin, S. Microalgal industry in China: Challenges and prospects. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Li, X.; Wang, X.; Duan, C.; Yi, S.; Gao, Z.; Xiao, C.; Agathos, S.N.; Wang, G.; Li, J. Biotechnological production of astaxanthin from the microalga Haematococcus pluvialis. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020, 43, 107602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Sanchez, S.; Ruiz, B.; Rodríguez-Sanoja, R.; Flores-Cotera, L.B. Microbial production of carotenoids. In Microbial production of food Ingredients, Enzymes and Nutraceuticals; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2013; pp. 194–233. [Google Scholar]
  99. Kot, A.M.; Błażejak, S.; Gientka, I.; Kieliszek, M.; Bryś, J. Torulene and torularhodin: “new” fungal carotenoids for industry? Microb. Cell Factories 2018, 17, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Perrier, V.; Dubreucq, E.; Galzy, P. Fatty acid and carotenoid composition of Rhodotorula strains. Arch. Microbiol. 1995, 164, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Simpson, K.L.; Nakayama, T.O.M.; Chichester, C.O. Biosynthesis of yeast carotenoids. J. Bacteriol. 1964, 88, 1688–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Goodwin, T.W.; Goodwin, T.W. Biosynthesis of carotenoids. In The Biochemistry of the Carotenoids: Volume I Plants; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1980; pp. 33–76. [Google Scholar]
  103. Fraser, P.D.; Bramley, P.M. The biosynthesis and nutritional uses of carotenoids. Prog. Lipid Res. 2004, 43, 228–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Buzzini, P.; Innocenti, M.; Turchetti, B.; Libkind, D.; van Broock, M.; Mulinacci, N. Carotenoid profiles of yeasts belonging to the genera Rhodotorula, Rhodosporidium, Sporobolomyces, and Sporidiobolus. Can. J. Microbiol. 2007, 53, 1024–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Buzzini, P. Batch and fed-batch carotenoid production by Rhodotorula glutinisDebaryomyces castellii co-cultures in corn syrup. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 90, 843–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Frengova, G.I.; Simova, E.D.; Beshkova, D.M. Effect of temperature changes on the production of yeast pigments co-cultivated with lacto-acid bacteria in whey ultrafiltrate. Biotechnol. Lett. 1995, 17, 1001–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Schroeder, W.A.; Johnson, E.A. Singlet Oxygen and Peroxyl Radicals Regulate Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Phaffia rhodozyma (∗). J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 18374–18379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zoz, L.; Carvalho, J.C.; Soccol, V.T.; Casagrande, T.C.; Cardoso, L. Torularhodin and torulene: Bioproduction, properties and prospective applications in food and cosmetics-a review. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2014, 58, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Braunwald, T.; Schwemmlein, L.; Graeff-Hönninger, S.; French, W.T.; Hernandez, R.; Holmes, W.E.; Claupein, W. Effect of different C/N ratios on carotenoid and lipid production by Rhodotorula glutinis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 6581–6588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Eme, L.; Spang, A.; Lombard, J.; Stairs, C.W.; Ettema, T.J. Archaea and the origin of eukaryotes. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Grnewald, K.; Eckert, M.; Hirschberg, J.; Hagen, C. Phytoene desaturase is localized exclusively in the chloroplast and up-regulated atthe mRNA level during accumulation of secondary carotenoids in Haematococcus pluvialis (Volvocales, Chlorophyceae). Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 1261–1268. [Google Scholar]
  112. Valadon, L.R.G. Carotenoids as additional taxonomic characters in fungi: A review. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1976, 67, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Peck, R.F.; Johnson, E.A.; Krebs, M.P. Identification of a lycopene β-cyclase required for bacteriorhodopsin biogenesis in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarum. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 2889–2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Verdoes, J.C.; Krubasik, P.; Sandmann, G.; Van Ooyen, A.J.J. Isolation and functional characterisation of a novel type of carotenoid biosynthetic gene from Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. Mol. Gen. Genet. MGG 1999, 262, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Hemmi, H.; Ikejiri, S.; Nakayama, T.; Nishino, T. Fusion-type lycopene β-cyclase from a thermoacidophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 305, 586–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Mapari, S.A.; Nielsen, K.F.; Larsen, T.O.; Frisvad, J.C.; Meyer, A.S.; Thrane, U. Exploring fungal biodiversity for the production of water-soluble pigments as potential natural food colorants. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2005, 16, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Dufossé, L. Microbial production of food grade pigments. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 44, 313–321. [Google Scholar]
  118. Mukherjee, G.; Singh, S.K. Purification and characterization of a new red pigment from Monascus purpureus in submerged fermentation. Process Biochem. 2011, 46, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Dufosse, L.; Fouillaud, M.; Caro, Y.; Mapari, S.A.; Sutthiwong, N. Filamentous fungi are large-scale producers of pigments and colorants for the food industry. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 26, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Gmoser, R.; Ferreira, J.A.; Lennartsson, P.R.; Taherzadeh, M.J. Filamentous ascomycetes fungi as a source of natural pigments. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2017, 4, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Liu, C.; Hu, B.; Cheng, Y.; Guo, Y.; Yao, W.; Qian, H. Carotenoids from fungi and microalgae: A review on their recent production, extraction, and developments. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 337, 125398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Matusova, R.; Rani, K.; Verstappen, F.W.; Franssen, M.C.; Beale, M.H.; Bouwmeester, H.J. The strigolactone germination stimulants of the plant-parasitic Striga and Orobanche spp. are derived from the carotenoid pathway. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 920–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Parry, A.D.; Horgan, R. Carotenoids and abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis in higher plants. Physiol. Plant. 1991, 82, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. von Lintig, J.; Vogt, K. Filling the gap in vitamin A research: Molecular identification of an enzyme cleaving β-carotene to retinal. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 11915–11920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Send, R.; Sundholm, D. The role of the β-ionone ring in the photochemical reaction of rhodopsin. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Xavier, A.A.O.; Pérez-Gálvez, A. Carotenoids as a Source of Antioxidants in the Diet. In Carotenoids in Nature: Biosynthesis, Regulation and Function; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 359–375. [Google Scholar]
  127. Domınguez-Bocanegra, A.R.; Legarreta, I.G.; Jeronimo, F.M.; Campocosio, A.T. Influence of environmental and nutritional factors in the production of astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 92, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ambrosio, C.L.B.; Campos, F.A.C.S.; Faro, Z.P.D. Carotenoids as an alternative against hypovitaminosis A. Rev. Nutr. 2006, 19, 233–243. [Google Scholar]
  129. Naguib, Y.M. Antioxidant activities of astaxanthin and related carotenoids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 1150–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Manimala, M.R.A.; Murugesan, R. Characterization of carotenoid pigment production from yeast Sporobolomyces sp. and their application in food products. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2018, 7, 2818–2821. [Google Scholar]
  131. Yamagata, K. Carotenoids regulate endothelial functions and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Carotenoids 2017, 25, 5772. [Google Scholar]
  132. Pratheeba, M.; Umaa, R.K.; Kotteeswaran, R.; Thamaraikannan, H. Extraction and analysis of beta carotenoid from red yeast Rhodotorula glutinis. Int. J. Pharm. Int. Life Sci. 2014, 2, 9–29. [Google Scholar]
  133. Geoffrey, B.A.; Felix, M.B. Canthaxanthin and the eye: A critical ocular toxicologic assessment. J. Toxicol. Cutan. Ocul. Toxicol. 1991, 10, 115–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Baker, R.T. Canthaxanthin in aquafeed applications: Is there any risk? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2001, 12, 240–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Butnariu, M. Methods of analysis (extraction, separation, identification and quantification) of carotenoids from natural products. J. Ecosyst. Ecography 2016, 6, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Altemimi, A.; Lightfoot, D.A.; Kinsel, M.; Watson, D.G. Employing response surface methodology for the optimization of ultrasound assisted extraction of lutein and β-carotene from spinach. Molecules 2015, 20, 6611–6625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Feltl, L.; Pacakova, V.; Stulik, K.; Volka, K. Reliability of carotenoid analyses: A review. Curr. Anal. Chem. 2005, 1, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Pennacchi, M.G.C.; Rodríguez-Fernández, D.E.; Vendruscolo, F.; Maranho, L.T.; Marc, I.; da Costa Cardoso, L.A. A comparison of cell disruption procedures for the recovery of intracellular carotenoids from Sporobolomyces ruberrimus H110. Int. J. Appl. Biol. Pharm. Technol. 2015, 6, 136–143. [Google Scholar]
  139. Oliver, J.; Palou, A. Chromatography determination of carotenoids in foods. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 881, 545–555. [Google Scholar]
  140. Ravanello, M.P.; Ke, D.; Alvarez, J.; Huang, B.; Shewmaker, C.K. Coordinate expression of multiple bacterial carotenoid genes in canola leading to altered carotenoid production. Metab. Eng. 2003, 5, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Weber, R.W.; Anke, H.; Davoli, P. Simple method for the extraction and reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of carotenoid pigments from red yeasts (Basidiomycota, Fungi). J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1145, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Fong, N.; Burgess, M.; Barrow, K.; Glenn, D. Carotenoid accumulation in the psychrotrophic bacterium Arthrobacter agilis in response to thermal and salt stress. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 56, 750–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Jagannadham, M.V.; Rao, V.J.; Shivaji, S. The major carotenoid pigment of a psychrotrophic Micrococcus roseus strain: Purification, structure, and interaction with synthetic membranes. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 7911–7917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Kaiser, P.; Surmann, P.; Vallentin, G.; Fuhrmann, H. A small-scale method for quantitation of carotenoids in bacteria and yeasts. J. Microbiol. Methods 2007, 70, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Tanaka, T.; Ide, T.; Tosoh Corp. Microorganism and Method for Producing Canthaxanthin. U.S. Patent 8,569,014, 29 October 2013. [Google Scholar]
  146. Zelena, K.; Hardebusch, B.; Hülsdau, B.; Berger, R.G.; Zorn, H. Generation of norisoprenoid flavors from carotenoids by fungal peroxidases. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 9951–9955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Gupta, S.K.; Trivedi, D.; Srivastava, S.; Joshi, S.; Halder, N.; Verma, S.D. Lycopene attenuates oxidative stress induced experimental cataract development: An in vitro and in vivo study. Nutrition 2003, 19, 794–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Koklesova, L.; Liskova, A.; Samec, M.; Buhrmann, C.; Samuel, S.M.; Varghese, E.; Ashrafizadeh, M.; Najafi, M.; Shakibaei, M.; Büsselberg, D.; et al. Carotenoids in cancer apoptosis—The road from bench to bedside and back. Cancers 2020, 12, 2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Lim, J.Y.; Wang, X.D. Mechanistic understanding of β-cryptoxanthin and lycopene in cancer prevention in animal models. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2020, 1865, 158652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Kohandel, Z.; Farkhondeh, T.; Aschner, M.; Samarghandian, S. Nrf2 a molecular therapeutic target for Astaxanthin. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 137, 111374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Imran, M.; Ghorat, F.; Ul-Haq, I.; Ur-Rehman, H.; Aslam, F.; Heydari, M.; Shariati, M.A.; Okuskhanova, E.; Yessimbekov, Z.; Thiruvengadam, M.; et al. Lycopene as a natural antioxidant used to prevent human health disorders. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Hajizadeh-Sharafabad, F.; Zahabi, E.S.; Malekahmadi, M.; Zarrin, R.; Alizadeh, M. Carotenoids supplementation and inflammation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 8161–8177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Kan, B.; Guo, D.; Yuan, B.; Vuong, A.M.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, M.; Cheng, H.; Zhao, Q.; Li, B.; Feng, L.; et al. Dietary carotenoid intake and osteoporosis: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2018. Arch. Osteoporos. 2022, 17, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Sahni, S.; Dufour, A.B.; Fielding, R.A.; Newman, A.B.; Kiel, D.P.; Hannan, M.T.; Jacques, P.F. Total carotenoid intake is associated with reduced loss of grip strength and gait speed over time in adults: The Framingham Offspring Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 113, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Arunkumar, R.; Gorusupudi, A.; Bernstein, P.S. The macular carotenoids: A biochemical overview. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2020, 1865, 158617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Ng, Q.X.; De Deyn, M.L.Z.Q.; Loke, W.; Foo, N.X.; Chan, H.W.; Yeo, W.S. Effects of astaxanthin supplementation on skin health: A systematic review of clinical studies. J. Diet. Suppl. 2021, 18, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Hadad, N.; Levy, R. The synergistic anti-inflammatory effects of lycopene, lutein, β-carotene, and carnosic acid combinations via redox-based inhibition of NF-κB signaling. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 53, 1381–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Gori, T.; Münzel, T. Oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction: Therapeutic implications. Ann. Med. 2011, 43, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Knight, J.A. Diseases related to oxygen-derived free radicals. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 1995, 25, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  160. Chew, B.P.; Park, J.S. Carotenoid action on the immune response. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 257S–261S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Stahl, W.; Sies, H. β-Carotene and other carotenoids in protection from sunlight. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 96, 1179S–1184S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Linnewiel-Hermoni, K.; Khanin, M.; Danilenko, M.; Zango, G.; Amosi, Y.; Levy, J.; Sharoni, Y. The anti-cancer effects of carotenoids and other phytonutrients resides in their combined activity. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2015, 572, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. FG Cicero, A.; Colletti, A. Effects of carotenoids on health: Are all the same? Results from clinical trials. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 2422–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Stahl, W.; Sies, H. Bioactivity and protective effects of natural carotenoids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis. 2005, 1740, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Tapiero, H.; Townsend, D.M.; Tew, K.D. The role of carotenoids in the prevention of human pathologies. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2004, 58, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Seel, W.; Baust, D.; Sons, D.; Albers, M.; Etzbach, L.; Fuss, J.; Lipski, A. Carotenoids are used as regulators for membrane fluidity by Staphylococcus xylosus. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Katan, M.B.; Grundy, S.M.; Jones, P.; Law, M.; Miettinen, T.; Paoletti, R.; Participants, S.W. August. Efficacy and safety of plant stanols and sterols in the management of blood cholesterol levels. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; Volume 78, pp. 965–978. [Google Scholar]
  168. Rao, A.V. Lycopene, tomatoes, and the prevention of coronary heart disease. Exp. Biol. Med. 2002, 227, 908–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Rao, A.V.; Rao, L.G. Carotenoids and human health. Pharmacol. Res. 2007, 55, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. McEneny, J.; Wade, L.; Young, I.S.; Masson, L.; Duthie, G.; McGinty, A.; McMaster, C.; Thies, F. Lycopene intervention reduces inflammation and improves HDL functionality in moderately overweight middle-aged individuals. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2013, 24, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Ramesh, C.; Vinithkumar, N.V.; Kirubagaran, R.; Venil, C.K.; Dufossé, L. Multifaceted applications of microbial pigments: Current knowledge, challenges and future directions for public health implications. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Gouranton, E.; Thabuis, C.; Riollet, C.; Malezet-Desmoulins, C.; El Yazidi, C.; Amiot, M.J.; Borel, P.; Landrier, J.F. Lycopene inhibits proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine expression in adipose tissue. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2011, 22, 642–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Sandmann, G. Carotenoids of biotechnological importance. Biotechnol. Isoprenoids 2015, 449–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. SanGiovanni, J.P.; Neuringer, M. The putative role of lutein and zeaxanthin as protective agents against age-related macular degeneration: Promise of molecular genetics for guiding mechanistic and translational research in the field. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 96, 1223S–1233S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Eggersdorfer, M.; Wyss, A. Carotenoids in human nutrition and health. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2018, 652, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Rao, A.V.; Balachandran, B. Role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in neurodegenerative diseases. Nutr. Neurosci. 2002, 5, 291–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Wu, W.; Li, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Liu, X. Lutein suppresses inflammatory responses through Nrf2 activation and NF-κB inactivation in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated BV-2 microglia. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015, 59, 1663–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. A proposed scheme for the role of dietary carotenoids as exogenous antioxidants in the body.
Figure 2. A proposed scheme for the role of dietary carotenoids as exogenous antioxidants in the body.
Microbiolres 15 00111 g002
Figure 3. Carotenoids’ mode of action against chronic diseases.
Figure 3. Carotenoids’ mode of action against chronic diseases.
Microbiolres 15 00111 g003
Table 2. Global commercial manufacturers of carotenoids and related products.
Table 2. Global commercial manufacturers of carotenoids and related products.
CarotenoidMicrobial SourceName of Product/Company NamesIndustrial ApplicationCountry
β-caroteneSpirulinaSpirulina biomass (tablets, powder)/Tianjin Norland Biotech Co., Ltd.Nutrition for animals, dietary supplements, and cosmeticsChina
Blakeslea trisporaLyc-O-Beta, BetaBeads, and BetaCote (tablets and powder)/LycoRed Ltd.Dietary supplement, food, and drinkIsrael
Dunaliella BandawilDunaliella Hard Capsules/Nikken Sohonsha CorporationNutritional supplementJapan
Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis)Hawaiian Spirulina (in tablet and powder form)/Cynotech CorporationDietary supplementUSA
AstaxanthinHaematococcus pluvialisZestlifeTM (soft gels)/Zestlife Ltd.Dietary supplementUnited Kingdom
Haematococcus pluvialisAstalif® (oleoresin)/AlgalifDietary supplements and cosmeticsIceland
Haematococcus pluvialisAstaReal® (oleoresin, powder)/Co., Ltd. Fuji Chemical Industrysupplements, pharmaceuticals, and animal feedJapan
Haematococcus pluvialisAstabio® (oil, powder, water soluble liquids) MC Biotech Sdn BhdSupplementary, medicinal, and cosmetic itemsBrunei
Haematococcus pluvialisAstaFirst (powder)/Wefrst Biotechnology Co., Ltd.Animal nutritionChina
Spirulinano name (powder)/E.I.D. Parry Ltd.Dietary supplementIndia
Haematococcus pluvialisCDX-°1 (powder)/Cardax, Inc.Pharmaceutical and dietary supplement productsUSA
FucoxanthinPhaeodactylum tricornutumFucoVitalTM (powder)/Algatech InternationalDietary supplementIsrael
Laminaria japonica and Undaria pinnatifda HarveyThinOgen® (powder, softgel)/Beijing Gingko GroupDietary supplementsChina
Lutein Chlorella sp. Sun Chlorella Corporation-Japan
Chlorella sp.Maypro Industries Inc-USA
Chlorella sp.Far East Microalgae Ind Co., Ltd.-Taiwan
Chlorella sp.Roquette Klotze GmbH and Co. KG-Germany
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sharma, C.; Kamle, M.; Kumar, P. Microbial-Derived Carotenoids and Their Health Benefits. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 15, 1670-1689. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres15030111

AMA Style

Sharma C, Kamle M, Kumar P. Microbial-Derived Carotenoids and Their Health Benefits. Microbiology Research. 2024; 15(3):1670-1689. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres15030111

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sharma, Chikanshi, Madhu Kamle, and Pradeep Kumar. 2024. "Microbial-Derived Carotenoids and Their Health Benefits" Microbiology Research 15, no. 3: 1670-1689. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres15030111

APA Style

Sharma, C., Kamle, M., & Kumar, P. (2024). Microbial-Derived Carotenoids and Their Health Benefits. Microbiology Research, 15(3), 1670-1689. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres15030111

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop