Next Article in Journal
Cannabis- and Substance-Related Carcinogenesis in Europe: A Lagged Causal Inferential Panel Regression Study
Previous Article in Journal
Deposition, Dietary Exposure and Human Health Risks of Heavy Metals in Mechanically Milled Maize Flours in Mbarara City, Uganda
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Pregnancy—Between Sensitivity and Resistance to Antimycotics

by
Nicoleta-Maricica Maftei
1,2,*,
Manuela Arbune
3,4,
Costinela Valerica Georgescu
1,5,
Alina Mihaela Elisei
1,
Alina Viorica Iancu
6,7,* and
Alin Laurentiu Tatu
3,8,9
1
Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Research Centre in the Medical-Pharmaceutical Field, University “Dunărea de Jos”, 800010 Galati, Romania
2
Medical Laboratory Department, “Sfântul Ioan” Children’s Emergency Hospital, 800487 Galați, Romania
3
Clinical Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University “Dunărea de Jos”, 800010 Galati, Romania
4
Infectious Diseases Department, Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases “Sf. Cuvioasa Parascheva”, 800179 Galati, Romania
5
Department of Public Health, Clinical Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology “Buna Vestire“, 800151 Galati, Romania
6
Medical Laboratory Department, Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases “Sf. Cuvioasa Parascheva”, 800179 Galati, Romania
7
Department of Morphological and Functional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University “Dunărea de Jos”, 800010 Galati, Romania
8
Research Center in the Field of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, ReFORM-UDJ, 800010 Galati, Romania
9
Dermatology Department, Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases “Sf. Cuvioasa Parascheva”, 800179 Galati, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Xenobiot. 2023, 13(3), 312-322; https://doi.org/10.3390/jox13030023
Submission received: 17 March 2023 / Revised: 6 June 2023 / Accepted: 1 July 2023 / Published: 5 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Drug Therapeutics)

Abstract

:
Vulvovaginitis with Candida spp. is the most common infection in women and the rate is increased during pregnancy. Antifungal prescription in pregnant women continues to present challenges and the decision must balance the risk of fetal toxicity with the benefits to the fetus and mother. Starting from the idea that clotrimazole is the most recommended antifungal in candidal vaginitis in pregnancy, we tested the sensitivity of different species of Candida spp. to other azoles, polyenes, and antimetabolites. This retrospective study (January to June 2019) assessed 663 pregnant women hospitalized for various pregnancy-related symptoms in which samples of phage secretion were taken. The laboratory results confirmed 21% of cases, indicating 140 positive mycologic samples. In this study, vaginal candidiasis was mostly related to the first trimester of pregnancy (53.57%,) and less related in the last trimester (17.14%). Candida albicans was the most frequent isolated strain in this study, accounting for 118 cases, followed by 16 strains of Candida glabrata and 6 cases of Candida krusei. The highest sensitivity for C. albicans was found in azoles, mostly in miconazole (93.2%), while C. krusei was completely resistant to polyene with low sensitivity in antimetabolites and even in some azoles, such as fluconazole. In our study, higher resistance rates to flucytosine were found, with C. glabrata and C. krusei exhibiting greater resistance than C. albicans.

1. Introduction

Pregnancy enhances vulnerability to infections, although it is considered to be a physiological state, and increases the rate of spontaneous abortions, congenital malformations, fetal toxicity, and premature births. Candida spp. are the most common fungal infections during pregnancy, with an increased rate of 30% compared with 20% in nonpregnant women [1,2].
Most of the infections are recorded in the first trimester of pregnancy, which brings forward the risk of the occurrence of antimycotic teratogenic effects and imposes the usage of minimum effective doses of antimycotics during this key fetal development period [3].
New antifungal drugs have been developed in the last decade. However, there is a lack of complete clarity in terms of the optimum antifungal regimens and doses during pregnancy, especially considering the changes in body composition and variations in maternal pharmacokinetics [4].
The major antifungal classes are azoles, polyenes, antimetabolites, and echinocandins, each with distinct acting mechanisms. According to the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA), these antifungal drugs are classified into five groups that are related to the risks in pregnancy (Table 1).
Azole drugs alter the fungal membrane’s structure and permeability by blocking 14-demethylase activity and the selective inhibition of cytochrome P450-dependent lanosterol 14α-demethylase in the pathway of ergosterol synthesis. Ergosterol biosynthesis inhibitors such as the allylamines (naftifine, terbinafine) interfere with ergosterol synthesis by inhibiting the enzyme involved in the first ergosterol synthesis stages, namely squalene epoxidase (Figure 1).
This inhibition leads to the accumulation of large quantities of squalene and a reduction in the quantity of ergosterol, leading to permeability disorders, the fragmentation of parietal cell structures, and, in the end, the death of the fungal cell [6]. Ketoconazole is obtained by chemical synthesis with the active substance cis-1-acetyl-4/4-2-2,4-dichlorophenol-2-1-H-imidazole-1-yl-metyl-1,3-dioxolan-4yl-methoxy-nilpiperazine. Fluconazole contains two triazole structures (2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1,3-bis(1H-1,2,4-triazole-1-yl) propan-2-ol) and is the most used antifungal agent [6].
Polyene drugs, including amphotericin B and nystatin, bind to the cellular membrane, causing modifications to the fungal membrane’s structure and permeability through selective ergosterol binding. Adding sodium deoxycholate (D-AMB) to the amphotericin B formula allows for parenteral administration. The toxicity profile of polyenes has been improved by nanotechnology, as liposomal nystatin has been developed by being embedded into liposomes structures of dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine and dimyristoyl phosphatidylglycerol [6].
Glucan synthesis inhibitors such as caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin impair the synthesis of 1,3-beta-D-glucan, a substance that is required in the composition of the fungal cellular wall. Glucan fibers, together with chitin, are organized into a firm reticular structure that provides cellular shape and strength, both of which are parameters that are involved in essential cell functions such as osmosis, growth, and division [6].
Antimetabolites represented by small molecules like the DNA matrix cause the incorrect synthesis of DNA molecules (flucytosine). Chemically speaking, 5-flucytosine is a fluoridated pyrimidine. The action mechanism of this antifungal is different from the other antifungals, with the fungal cell being taken over and transformed by a deamination process into 5-fluorouracil, a compound that replaces the uracil within the fungal RNA. It also inhibits thymidylate synthase by 5 fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate, an essential enzyme in RNA synthesis [6]. This study aimed at establishing the sensitivity and resistance of various Candida strains to antimycotics because clotrimazole is the most recommended antifungal in candidal vaginitis in pregnancy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling The Cases

From January to June of 2019, 663 pregnant women were admitted to the “Buna Vestire” Clinical Obstetrics-Gynaecology Hospital of Galati with a clinical presumptive diagnosis of genital candidiasis; however, following laboratory analyses, only 140 women were finally diagnosed with a clinical diagnosis of genital candidiasis. The laboratory results confirmed 21% of cases to have positive mycologic samples after being statistically analyzed. Sampling was conducted following the best practices outlined in standards and codes, and all protection measures for both patients and medical staff were complied with.

2.2. Laboratory Works

Candida strains were isolated from patients presenting clinical symptoms of vaginal infections. The samples were collected aseptically at the slit lamp. Cotton swabs (sterile) were gently smeared around the vaginal region and quickly transferred to Sabouraud dextrose broth with a pH of 5.6 that contained 4% dextrose and 1% peptone in distilled watercombined with 5.0 mg of chloramphenicol. The culture tubes thus prepared were incubated at 37 °C (24–48 h).
The reference standard strains were C. albicans and C. parapsilopsis, which were used to emphasize various strains. Microscopic examination was conducted using 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) according to the method described in [7].

2.3. Mycologic Culture

Cultivation was undertaken on a chloramphenicol-free agar dextrose Sabouraud culture environment, which inhibits the multiplication of contaminated bacteria and allows for the good development of yeasts. On culture environments, medical yeasts develop within 48–72 h of incubation. The incubation temperature after seeding was 36–37 °C. Because the bacterial contamination might compromise the species identification stage, Gram-stained smears were made after obtaining the first culture, which were then examined with an inverted microscope. In order to obtain a pure culture, replication may be performed in order to eliminate other bacteria.
In order to determine the species and obtain the antifungigram, the Candifast kit was used. For testing, the antimycotics amphotericin and nystatin were used from the class of azoles, econazole, fluconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole, and polyenes, as well as flucytosine from the antimetabolites class.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The sensitivity and resistance of various Candida strains to antifungal drugs was retrospectively analyzed by statistical methods using the statistical software SPSS 24.0. The Fisher test and the Relative Risk (RR) indicator were used with a confidence interval (IC95%), and we present the p-values generated by this test.

3. Results

Vulvovaginitis with Candida spp. is the most common infection in women and the rate is increased during pregnancy. Antifungal prescription in pregnant women continues to present challenges, and the decision must balance the risks of fetal toxicity with the benefits to fetus and mother.
In our study, vaginal candidiasis was mostly related to the first trimester of pregnancy (53.57%,) and was less common in the last trimester (17.14%) (Figure 2).
C. albicans was the most frequent isolated strain in our study, accounting for 118 cases, followed by 16 strains of C. glabrata and 6 cases of C. krusei (Figure 3).
The highest sensitivity for C. albicans was found in azoles, mostly in miconazole (93.2%), while polyenes and antimetabolites showed much lower sensitivity (Table 2).
The estimated risk of Candida albicans was neither significantly higher in patients with polyene resistance (RR = 1.06; IC95%: 0.86–1.31; p = 0.691) nor a protection factor in those sensitive to polyenes (RR = 1.09; IC95%: 0.80–1.48; p = 0.691).
Compared with the azoles treatment, the resistance to amphotericin induced a significantly higher estimated risk of Candida albicans:
-
Risk was nine times higher compared to miconazole resistance (RR = 9.0; IC95%: 4.54–17.18; p = 0.001);
-
Risk was more than seven times higher compared with resistance to fluconazole (RR = 7.20; IC95%: 3.91–13.30; p = 0.001);
-
Risk was four times higher compared with resistance to ketoconazole (RR = 4.0; IC95%: 2.55–6.27; p = 0.001);
-
Risk was three times higher compared with resistance to econazole (RR = 3.0; IC95%: 2.04–4.41; p = 0.001).
C. krusei was completely resistant to polyene with low sensitivity in antimetabolites and even in some azoles, such as fluconazole. Although resistance to miconazole is higher than in C. albicans, this drug has the best potency based on sensitivity in over 80% of the strains, including C. krusei (Figure 4 and Figure 5).
Compared with the azoles treatment, resistance to nystatin induced a significantly higher risk of infection with Candida albicans:
-
Risk was 8.5 times higher compared with resistance to ketoconazole (RR = 8.50; IC95%: 4.28–16.90; p = 0.001);
-
Risk was approximately seven times higher compared with the resistance to fluconazole (RR = 6.80; IC95%: 3.68–12.60; p = 0.001);
-
Risk was 3.78 times higher compared with resistance to miconazole (RR = 3.78; IC95%: 2.40–5.94; p = 0.001);
-
Risk was approximately three times higher compared with resistance to econazole (RR = 2.83; IC95%: 1.92–4.18; p = 0.001).
From the azoles, resistance to econazole induced a significantly higher risk towards miconazole (RR = 3.0; IC95%: 1.41–6.40; p = 0.004) or fluconazole (RR = 2.40; IC95%: 1.20–4.80; p = 0.016).
Sensitivity to azoles, compared with the sensitivity to polyenes (RR = 0.47; IC95%: 0.40–0.55; p = 0.001) or antimetabolites (RR = 0.28; IC95%: 0.20–0.38; p = 0.001), represents a protection factor in the positivation of Candida albicans strains.
Compared with resistance to azoles, the estimated risk of Candida albicans was significantly higher in patients resistant to antimetabolites (RR = 3.60; IC95%: 2.65–4.90; p = 0.001).
Compared with treatment with azoles, the resistance to polyenes (RR = 2.40; IC95%: 1.49–3.85; p = 0.003) or antimetabolites (RR = 2.10; IC95%: 1.26–3.49; p = 0.01) induced a two times higher estimated risk of Candida glabrata.
Sensitivity to azoles compared with sensitivity to polyenes (RR = 0.42; IC95%: 0.26–0.67; p = 0.003) or antimetabolites (RR = 0.48; IC95%: 0.29–0.79; p = 0.01) represents a protection factor in the positivation of the Candida glabrata strains.
Compared with the azoles treatment, resistance to antimetabolites induced a two times higher risk of Candida krusei (RR = 2.0; IC95%: 1.43–2.79; p = 0.004).
Sensitivity to azoles, compared with sensitivity to polyenes (RR = 0.63; IC95%: 0.44–0.91; p = 0.036) or antimetabolites (RR = 0.50; IC95%: 0.35–0.70; p = 0.004), represents a protection factor in the positivation of the Candida krusei strains.
In our study, higher resistance rates to flucytosine were found in C. glabrata and C. krusei than in C. albicans.

4. Discussion

The resistance to antifungal drugs is increasing. The choice of the right antifungal regiment for vaginal candidiasis in pregnant women must consider the general antibiotic stewardship principles, as well as drug sensitivity and resistance data related to fungal resistance tests. Nevertheless, these tests are time-consuming and waiting for results it is not always possible, requiring a first-line regimen based on local antifungal resistance data.
Candida spp. infection is often asymptomatic during pregnancy. Despite the absence of clinical symptoms, vaginal colonization has been associated with clinical events such as premature birth [8,9] and, in rare cases, intra-amniotic infection [10]. Numerous studies have described an association between maternal vaginal colonization and the subsequent colonization of the newborn [10,11]. Candida spp. represent a major risk factor for systemic infections in newborns and are associated with increased mortality [2,12]. Women who were colonized with Candida spp. in the second trimester of pregnancy had higher premature birth rates and lower fetal birth weight compared with colonization in the first trimester of pregnancy [13,14,15]. Thus, the antifungal prescription must consider the fetal risk of teratogenic effects and the usage of minimum effective doses [5].
Other conditions related to pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during pregnancy, such as increased cardiac flow, intestinal blood flow, gastric pH, and serum albumin concentration, were considered for antifungal management. Furthermore, the changes in renal filtration and elimination, together with the changes in kidney receptor sensitivity, either increasing (2A6, 2C9, 2D6, 3A4) or decreasing (1A2, 2C19), highlight the kidney clearance of antifungal drugs [16,17,18].
Although clotrimazole is the most recommended antifungal in candidal vaginitis in pregnancy, miconazole is the preferred antifungal drug, whatever the species of vaginal candidiasis. Although miconazole is categorized in class C for pregnancy risk, the topical vaginal formulations used in clinical practice during the first trimester did not prove to have harmful effects [19].
Conversely, nystatin and amphotericin have the lowest sensitivity for all species and should not be recommended, even though they are categorized in class A and B for pregnancy risk.
The molecular mechanisms of resistance to antifungal antibiotics are yet to be well known for C. albicans strains, but the presence of merging strains is increasing in clinical practice and specific resistance patterns are developing (Table 3).
Azole resistance involves the epigenetic variety phenomenon, which is the transitory expression of certain genes related to temporary resistance or sensitivity in certain Candida strains. The punctiform mutations within the cytochrome P450-dependent 14α-sterol demethylase (P450DM lanosterol demethylase) enzyme inhibit azole binding but not the enzyme substrate, thus decreasing antifungal sensitivity [21].
The super expression of the cytochrome P450-dependent 14α-sterol demethylase enzyme, due to the increase in the number of copies of the target enzyme, could bring forward increases in the minimum inhibiting concentrations of antifungal drugs [22].
Biofilm formation and intracellular persistence are the characteristics of C. glabrata which allow it to develop antifungal resistance [23,24]. For various inflammatory and infectious diseases, drugs have an increased effect when they are based on molecules in liposomal form [25].
The complete resistance of C. krusei to fluconazole is demonstrative of why these mechanisms are not yet clarified [20,24]. It is assumed that the resistance to amphotericin B is developed due to mutations and the selection of resistant clones within a population, as phenotypic differences are noticed between strains that are sensitive and resistant to amphotericin. As ergosterol is the target of amphotericin B, the sterol content within the membrane is modified and structural alterations occur [24].
All six strains of C. krusei in our study were resistant to polyene. Particularly, the polyene resistance of C. glabrata is not well documented in the scientific literature, owing to the replacement of polyene-binding sterols and consecutive intracellular camouflage [23].
Resistance to 5-flucytosine is frequent and occurs mainly, in the case of monotherapy, through genetic mutations related to DNA repair, RNA, and protein metabolism [26].
Besides the specific resistance mechanisms of the antifungal class, the cross-resistance of some mechanisms was extensively developed in various antifungal agents, and sensitivity differences in antifungal drugs are expected from one strain to another [27]. The rate of infection depends on the virulence of the bacteria, the resistance factors of the host, and the regional anatomy [28]. A better understanding of the epidemiological context can be complex, but complete clinical examination and laboratory tests are important for diagnosis [29,30,31] in different hospital units because they could help clinicians to correlate the clinical manifestations of infection.

5. Conclusions

The present study retrospectively evaluated the sensitivity of Candida spp. isolated in vulvovaginitis during pregnancy. Antifungal prescriptions must account for variations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during pregnancy. The spread of antifungal resistance limits the use of some therapeutic regimens and requires careful mycologic diagnosis. Most vaginal candidiasis in pregnancy is diagnosed in the first trimester. C. albicans is the main species identified in vaginal samples, while emerging species such as C. glabrata and C. krusei are also found. According to local mycologic data, topical miconazole could be recommended as a first-line antifungal treatment for vaginal candidiasis, although the complexity of resistance mechanisms in Candida spp. requires individual decisions to be made.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.-M.M. and A.V.I.; methodology, N.-M.M. and A.V.I.; software, M.A. and A.M.E.; validation, N.-M.M. and A.V.I.; formal analysis, M.A., C.V.G. and A.L.T.; investigation, N.-M.M. and A.V.I.; resources, M.A., C.V.G. and A.L.T.; data curation, A.M.E.; writing—original draft preparation, N.-M.M. and A.V.I.; writing—review and editing, M.A., C.V.G. and A.L.T.; visualization; supervision, M.A., C.V.G. and A.L.T.; project administration, C.V.G. and A.L.T.; funding acquisition, M.A. and A.M.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the research staff of “Dunărea de Jos” University, Galați, Romania, for financial support towards publishing our study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hamad, M.; Kazandji, N.; Awadallah, S.; Allam, H. Prevalence, and epidemiological characteristics of vaginal candidiasis in the UAE. Mycoses 2014, 57, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ghaddar, N.; El Roz, A.; Ghssein, G.; Ibrahim, J.N. Emergence of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis among Lebanese Pregnant Women: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Species Distribution. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 2019, 5016810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Hui, I.; Bianchi, D.W. Prenatal pharmacotherapy for fetal anomalies: A 2011 update. Prenat. Diagn. 2011, 31, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pilmis, B.; Jullien, V.; Sobel, J.; Lecuit, M.; Lortholary, O.; Charlier, C. Antifungal drugs during pregnancy: An updated review. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mani Chandrika, K.V.S.; Sharma, S. Promising antifungal agents: A minireview. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2020, 28, 115398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Corneli, O.; Calin, M. Antifungal Antibiotics: Classification, Mechanisms of Action and Resistance Mechanisms, Medichub Media. 2016. Available online: https://www.medichub.ro/reviste/infectio-ro/antibiotice-antifungice (accessed on 20 February 2023).
  7. Gow, N.A.R.; Netea, M.G. Medical mycology and fungal immunology: New research perspectives addressing a major world health challenge. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2016, 371, 20150462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Sanguinetti, M.; Posteraro, B. New approaches for antifungal susceptibility testing. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2017, 23, 931–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bar-Oz, B.; Moretti, M.E.; Bishai, R.; Mareels, G.; Van Tittelboom, T.; Verspeelt, J.; Koren, G. Pregnancy outcome after in utero exposure to itraconazole: A prospective cohort study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000, 183, 617–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Briggs, F.R.; Yaffe, S.J. Drugs in Pregnancy: A Reference Guide to Fetal and Neonatal Risk, 6th ed.; Briggs, G.G., Yaffe, J., Eds.; Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  11. Daniel, S.; Rotem, R.; Koren, G.; Lunenfeld, E.; Levy, A. Vaginal antimycotics and the risk for spontaneous abortions. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 218, 601.e1–601.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hebert, M.F.; Ma, X.; Naraharisetti, S.B.; Krudys, K.M.; Umans, J.G.; Hankins, G.D.V.; Caritis, S.N.; Miodovnik, M.; Mattison, D.R.; Unadkat, J.D.; et al. Are we optimizing gestational diabetes treatment with glyburide? The pharmacologic basis for better clinical practice. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 85, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Holzer, I.; Farr, A.; Kiss, H.; Hagmann, M.; Petricevic, L. The colonization. with Candida species is more harmful in the second trimester of pregnancy. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2017, 295, 891–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Mendling, W.; Brasch, J. Guideline vulvovaginal candidosis (2010) of the german society for gynecology and obstetrics, the working group for infections and infectimmunology in gynecology and obstetrics, the german society of dermatology, the board of german dermatologists and the. Mycoses 2012, 55, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mølgaard-Nielsen, D.; Svanström, H.; Melbye, M.; Hviid, A.; Pasternak, B. Association Between Use of Oral Fluconazole During Pregnancy and Risk of Spontaneous Abortion and Stillbirth. JAMA 2016, 315, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Rotem, R.; Fishman, B.; Daniel, S.; Koren, G.; Lunenfeld, E.; Levy, A. Risk of major congenital malformations following first-trimester exposure to vaginal azoles used for treating vulvovaginal candidiasis: A population-based retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2018, 125, 1550–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Sima, R.; Mohammad, A.; Afsaneh, T.; Behrashi, M.; Mousavie, G. Vaginal Candidiasis Complications on Pregnant Women. Jundishapur. J. Microbiol. 2014, 7, e10078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tracy, T.S.; Venkataramanan, R.; Glover, D.D.; Caritis, S.N. Temporal changes in drug metabolism (CYP1A2, CYP2D6 and CYP3A activity) during pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 192, 633–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Soong, D.; Einarson, A. Vaginal yeast infections during pregnancy. Can. Fam. Physician 2009, 55, 255–256. [Google Scholar]
  20. Whaley, S.G.; Berkow, E.L.; Rybak, J.M.; Nishimoto, A.T.; Barker, K.S.; Rogers, P.D. Azole Antifungal Resistance in Candida albicans and Emerging Non-albicans Candida Species. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lepesheva, G.I.; Waterman, M.R. Sterol 14alpha-demethylase cytochrome P450 (CYP51), a P450 in all biological kingdoms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1770, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Benhamou, R.I.; Bibi, M.; Steinbuch, K.B.; Engel, H.; Levin, M.; Roichman, Y.; Berman, J.; Fridman, M. Real-Time Imaging of the Azole Class of Antifungal Drugs in Live Candida Cellsx. ACS Chem. Biol. 2017, 12, 1769–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rodrigues, C.F.; Rodrigues, M.E.; Silva, S.; Henriques, M. Candida glabrata Biofilms: How Far Have We Come? J. Fungi 2017, 3, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Berman, J.; Krysan, D.J. Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tatu, A.L.; Nwabudike, L.C. The Treatment Options of Male Genital Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus Short Title for a Running Head: Treatments of Genital Lichen Sclerosus. In Proceedings of the 14th National Congress of Urogynecology and the National Conference of the Romanian Association for the Study of Pain, Thessaloniki, Greece, 27–30 June 2017; pp. 262–264. [Google Scholar]
  26. Costa, C.; Ponte, A.; Pais, P.; Santos, R.; Cavalheiro, M.; Yaguchi, T.; Chibana, H.; Teixeira, M. New Mechanisms of Flucytosine Resistance in C. glabrata Unveiled by a Chemogenomics Analysis in S. cerevisiae. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Revie, N.M.; Iyer, K.R.; Robbins, N.; Cowen, L.E. Antifungal drug resistance: Evolution, mechanisms and impact. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2018, 45, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hilițanu, L.N.; Mititelu-Tarțău, L.; Popa, G.E.; Buca, B.R.; Pavel, L.L.; Pelin, A.M.; Meca, A.D.; Bogdan, M.; Pricop, D.A. The Analysis of Chitosan-Coated Nanovesicles Containing Erythromycin-Characterization and Biocompatibility in Mice. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pelin, A.M.; Gavat, C.C.; Balan, G.; Georgescu, C.V. Pharmacological Principles Used in Patient Monitoring with Type 2 Diabetes. Rev. Chim. 2017, 68, 378–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pelin, A.M.; Mătăsaru, S. Metabolic syndrome in obese children and adolescents. Rev. Med. Chir. Soc. Med. Nat. Iasi 2012, 116, 957–961. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Meca, A.D.; Mititelu-Tarțău, L.; Bogdan, M.; Dijmarescu, L.A.; Pelin, A.M.; Foia, L.G. Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Pulmonary Rehabilitation: From Novel Pharmacotherapeutic Approaches to Management of Post-Tuberculosis Sequelae. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Azole mechanism of antifungal action. Source: https://www.pharmacologicalsciences.us/pharmaceutical-chemistry/mechanism-of-action.html (accessed on 12 February 2023).
Figure 1. Azole mechanism of antifungal action. Source: https://www.pharmacologicalsciences.us/pharmaceutical-chemistry/mechanism-of-action.html (accessed on 12 February 2023).
Jox 13 00023 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of vaginal candidiasis according to the stage of pregnancy.
Figure 2. Distribution of vaginal candidiasis according to the stage of pregnancy.
Jox 13 00023 g002
Figure 3. The frequency of different Candida spp.
Figure 3. The frequency of different Candida spp.
Jox 13 00023 g003
Figure 4. The antifungigram profile of C. krusei strains.
Figure 4. The antifungigram profile of C. krusei strains.
Jox 13 00023 g004
Figure 5. The antifungigram profile of C. glabrata strains.
Figure 5. The antifungigram profile of C. glabrata strains.
Jox 13 00023 g005
Table 1. Classification of antifungal drugs by their risk in pregnancy [5].
Table 1. Classification of antifungal drugs by their risk in pregnancy [5].
RiskDescriptionAntifungal ClassDrugs
AThe possibility of fetal harm appears remote in the first trimester because controlled studies of women have not demonstrated any risk to the fetus.PolyenesNystatin
BEither there have been no controlled studies on pregnant women and animal studies did not indicate a risk to the fetus,
or animal studies have indicated fetal risks but the controlled studies did not demonstrate a risk.
Polyenes
Squalene
epoxidase
inhibitors
Amphotericin B Terbinafine
Clotrimazole
CEither there are no available reports of studies on women or animals, or animal studies have indicated a fetal risk and there have been no controlled studies of women.Azoles
Echinocandins
Antimetabolites
Miscellaneous
Fluconazole low-dose regimen
Itraconazole
Posaconazole
Caspofungin
Micafungin
Anidulafungin
Flucytosine
Griseofulvine
Miconazole
DPositive evidence of fetal risk has been reported in the literature; even so, there can be some situations in which the benefits can outweigh the risk (e.g., life-threatening or serious diseases in which other drugs are ineffective or carry a greater risk).AzolesFluconazole high-dose regimen
Voriconazole
XAccording to studies on animals or humans, or on the basis of human experience, there is definitely a fetal risk, and
the risk clearly outweighs anything that may benefit pregnant women.
Table 2. Distribution of candidiasis cases depending on the sensitivity to antibiotic treatment.
Table 2. Distribution of candidiasis cases depending on the sensitivity to antibiotic treatment.
Candida albicansCandida kruseiCandida glabrata
SRSRSR
Amphotericin47 (39.0%)72 (61.0%)0 (0%)6 (100%)2 (12.5%)14 (87.5%)
Nystatin50 (42.4%)68 (57.6%)0 (0%)6 (100%)8 (50%)8 (50%)
Econazole94 (79.7%)24 (20.3%)3 (50%)3 (50%)12 (75%)4 (25%)
Fluconazole108 (91.5%)10 (8.5%)2 (33.3%)4 (66.7%)0 (0%)16 (100%)
Ketoconazole100 (87.4%)18 (15.3%)4 (66.7%)2 (33.3%)10 (62.5%)6 (37.5%)
Miconazole110 (93.2%)8 (6.8%)5 (83.3%)1 (16.7%)14 (87.5%)2 (12.5%)
Flucytosine64 (54.3%)54 (45.7%)1 (16.7%)5 (83.3%)2 (12.5%)14 (87.5%)
S = sensitive; R = resistant.
Table 3. The resistance mechanisms developed in Candida spp. [20].
Table 3. The resistance mechanisms developed in Candida spp. [20].
Resistance MechanismCandida albicansCandida glabrataCandida krusei
Altered sterol composition/Erg inactivationYesNoNo
Exogenous sterol uptakeNoYesNo
Increase ABC transporter expressionYesYesYes
Increase MFS transporter expressionYesNoNo
Low fluconazole–Erg 11 affinityNoNoYes
Increased Erg 11 expressionYesNoNo
AneuploidyYesYesYes
Erg11 mutationsYesNoNo
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maftei, N.-M.; Arbune, M.; Georgescu, C.V.; Elisei, A.M.; Iancu, A.V.; Tatu, A.L. Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Pregnancy—Between Sensitivity and Resistance to Antimycotics. J. Xenobiot. 2023, 13, 312-322. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox13030023

AMA Style

Maftei N-M, Arbune M, Georgescu CV, Elisei AM, Iancu AV, Tatu AL. Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Pregnancy—Between Sensitivity and Resistance to Antimycotics. Journal of Xenobiotics. 2023; 13(3):312-322. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox13030023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maftei, Nicoleta-Maricica, Manuela Arbune, Costinela Valerica Georgescu, Alina Mihaela Elisei, Alina Viorica Iancu, and Alin Laurentiu Tatu. 2023. "Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Pregnancy—Between Sensitivity and Resistance to Antimycotics" Journal of Xenobiotics 13, no. 3: 312-322. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox13030023

APA Style

Maftei, N. -M., Arbune, M., Georgescu, C. V., Elisei, A. M., Iancu, A. V., & Tatu, A. L. (2023). Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Pregnancy—Between Sensitivity and Resistance to Antimycotics. Journal of Xenobiotics, 13(3), 312-322. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox13030023

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop