Traceability System for Improved Utilization of Solid Biofuel from Agricultural Prunings
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (i)
- One step up-one step down flow model: In this case, some information is filtered at each stage, allowing only limited information to follow the product to the next stage.
- (ii)
- Aggregated information flow model: In this case, no information filtering is applied and aggregated information follows the product to the end point. The first option of the information flow model was applied in this study, because some information can be considered optional and be handled only by producers of biomass products.
- (a)
- Smart Box: this is a sensor unit that measures some parameters of biomass like relative humidity, temperature, and geographic positions;
- (b)
- On-board control unit: this enables the user to perform route planning and monitor the recordings made by the smart box;
- (c)
- Information platform: this is a centralized platform for performing documentation and data sharing, as well as facilitating biomass trading and management of pruning supply chain and traceability; and
- (d)
- Central control unit: this serves as an interface linking the Information platform and On-board control unit and serves as a point of administration for the whole biomass logistics system [6].
2. Defining Characteristics of Traceability System
2.1. Factors for Determining the Traceability System
- The label should have company’s name and contact information
- It should use terms that can describe the material under consideration
- It must be visible on the packaging
- Label design must be sync with label material
- The label must have a reference so that the control body can certify the product
- The color, font size, and style of lettering should be determined
- Label size can be determined depending on whether the both sides (front and back) or a single label or multiple labels can be used or not
- The label should have an appropriate shape that can draw attention e.g., rectangle, square, circle, or oval shapes can be used
- The label should have barcodes
2.2. Role and Responsibilities of Actors in the Pruning Biomass Supply Chain
2.3. Assigning Product Delivery Identification Number
- (i)
- Farmer (raw material producer): Farmer is represented by F followed by the country code and a label number (three ciphers e.g., 001, 002, etc.) assigned to a specific farmer. For example, a farmer in France with label number 268, will be identified as FFRA268.
- (ii)
- Processor (solid biofuel producer, e.g., storage stage): Processor is represented by P followed by the country code and label number assigned to it. For example, a processor in Germany with label number 157 will be identified as PDEU157. In general, for convenience, storage sites are considered under this category, whether there is further processing or not at the storage level.
- (iii)
- Distributor: Distributor (or trader) is represented by D followed by the country code and label number. For example, a distributor in Germany assigned label number 257 can be identified as DDEU257.
- (iv)
- Consumer: Consumer (end user) is represented by C followed by the country code and label number. For example, a consumer in Spain with label number 020 can be identified as CESP020.
2.4. Traceability Information Flow
2.5. Information on the Label
2.6. Parameters to Be Traced
3. Inspection
- (i)
- The first inspection could be conducted at the initial stage, when a biomass producer is interested in participating in the pruning biomass trading for energy production.
- (ii)
- Inspection shall be done at defined time intervals (e.g., once in two years).
- (iii)
- Unexpected inspection can be conducted upon demand if complaints have been received regarding the quality of product and/or process in producing and supplying pruning biomass for energy production.
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- EUROSTAT. Renewable Energy Statistics. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Renewable_energy_statistics (accessed on 8 January 2018).
- Torquati, B.; Marino, D.; Venanzi, S.; Porceddu, P.; Chiorri, M. Using tree crop pruning residues for energy purposes: A spatial analysis and an evaluation of the economic and environmental sustainability. Biomass Bioenergy 2016, 95, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blennow, K.; Persson, E.; Lindner, M.; Faias, S.P.; Hanewinkel, M. Forest owner motivations and attitudes towards supplying biomass for energy in Europe. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 67, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iakovou, E.; Karagiannidis, A.; Vlachos, D.; Toka, A.; Malamakis, A. Waste biomass-to-energy supply chain management: A critical synthesis. Waste Manag. 2010, 30, 1860–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sustainability Criteria and Certification Systems for Biomass Production. Biomass Technology Group (BTG), Project Report, Project Number 1386, The Netherlands. 2008. Available online: http://www.compete-bioafrica.net/sustainability/sustainability_criteria_and_certification_systems.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2015).
- Gebresenbet, G.; Bosona, T.; Olsson, S.-O.; Garcia, D. Smart System for the optimization of logistics performance of the pruning biomass value chain. Unpublished work. 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Spugnoli, P.; Dainelli, R.; D’Avino, L.; Mazzoncini, M.; Lazzeri, L. Sustainability of sunflower cultivation for biodiesel production in Tuscany within the EU Renewable Energy Directive. Biosyst. Eng. 2012, 112, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dabbene, F.; Gay, P.; Tortia, C. Traceability issues in food supply chain management: A review. Biosyst. Eng. 2013, 120, 65–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosona, T.; Gebresenbet, G. Food traceability as an integral part of logistics management in food and agricultural supply chain. Food Control 2013, 33, 32–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Produce Traceability Initiative Best Practices for Formatting Case Labels. Available online: http://www.producetraceability.org/documents/Best_Practices_Case_Label-_010312_FINAL.pdf (accessed on 6 December 2017).
- The Council of European Union. COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No. 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the Protection of Geographical Indications and Designations of Origin for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs. 2006. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32006R0510 (accessed on 20 July 2015).
- Folinas, D.; Manikas, I.; Manos, B. Traceability data management for food chains. Br. Food J. 2006, 108, 622–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DENSO ADC. QR Code Essentials. 2011. Available online: http://www.nacs.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=D1FpVAvvJuo%3D&tabid=1426&mid=4802 (accessed on 28 August 2015).
- Azuara, G.; Tornos, J.L.; Salazar, J.L. Improving RFID traceability systems with verifiable quality. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2012, 112, 340–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelepouris, T.; Pramatari, K.; Doukidis, G. RFID-enabled traceability in the food supply chain. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2007, 107, 183–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caja, G.; Carne, S.; Salama, A.A.K.; Ait-Saidi, A.; Rojas-Olivares, M.A.; Rovai, M.; Capote, J.; Castro, N.; Arguello, A.; Ayadi, M.; et al. State-of-the-art of electronic identification techniques and applications in goats. Small Rumin. Res. 2014, 121, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-Garcia, L.; Lunadei, L.; Barreiro, P.; Robla, J.I. A Review of Wireless Sensor Technologies and Applications in Agriculture and Food Industry: State of the Art and Current Trends. Sensors 2009, 9, 4728–4750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Van Dam, J.; Junginger, M.; Faaij, A.; Jürgens, I.; Best, G.; Fritsche, U. Overview of recent developments in sustainable biomass certification. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32, 749–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CIRCE and SLU. Description of the Biomass Specifications for the Value Chain. Project Report. 2013. Available online: file:///C:/Users/bosona/Downloads/EuroPruning_D2.1_Description%20of%20the%20biomass%20specifications%20for%20the%20value%20chain%20(1).pdf (accessed on 12 September 2017).
- Biomasud. Handbook for the Quality Label of Domestic Solid Biofuels. 2012. Biomasud Project SOE/P2/E414. Available online: http://www.infocalidad.net/wp-content/uploads/130909_Manual_Sello_Biomasud.pdf (accessed on 8 January 2018).
- EN 14961-1: New European Pellets Standard. Available online: http://www.biointernational.ru/sites/default/files/Alakangas_Pellet_standard_EN14961-1.pdf (accessed on 8 January 2018).
- EN 15234-1:2011: Solid Biofuels. Fuel Quality Assurance. Available online: https://shop.bsigroup.com/ProductDetail/?pid=000000000030219010 (accessed on 29 December 2017).
- EN 14961-1: 2010—Solid Biofuels. Fuel Specifications and Classes, General Requirements. Available online: https://shop.bsigroup.com/SearchResults/?q=EN+14961-1%3a2010 (accessed on 29 December 2017).
- ISCC (2011): System Basics for the Certification of Sustainable Biomass and Bioenergy, ISCC 201 System Basics. Available online: https://www.iscc-system.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/ISCC_DE_201_System-Basics.pdf (accessed on 29 December 2017).
- Official Website of EuroPruning Project. Available online: http://www.europruning.eu/web/data/category.aspx?id=smartlogistics (accessed on 28 December 2017).
- Bioenergy 2020. Proposal of a Product-Label for Small Scale Biomass Furnaces. 2013. Available online: http://www.bioenergy2020.eu/files/publications/pdf/2010-09_Proposal_of_a_Label_for_small_scale_Biomass_Frunaces.pdf (accessed on 28 October 2013).
- Intelligent Energy Europe. Enhancing the Implementation of Quality and Sustainability Standards and Certification Schemes for Solid Biofuels (EIE/11/218). Solid Standards Project, Deliverable 2.1d, Wood Chip Module. 2011. Available online: file:///C:/Users/bosona/Downloads/intelligent_energy_europe_-_enhancing_the_implementation_of_quality_and_sustainability_standards_and_certification _schemes_for_solid_biofuels_-_2014-07-17.pdf (accessed on 7 December 2017).
- Country Code, ISO 3166-1 Alpha-3. Available online: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/tradekb/Print50347.aspx (accessed on 7 December 2017).
- EuroPruning Application Website. Available online: http://europruning.mobitron.se/public/en (accessed on 25 November 2017).
- Cavicchi, B.; Palmieri, S.; Odaldi, M. The Influence of Local Governance: Effects on the Sustainability of Bioenergy Innovation. Sustainability 2017, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EuroPruning Project Report on Logistics Chain and Knowledge Gaps of Biomass. SLU. 2016. Deliverable D5.1. Available online: http://www.europruning.eu/web/data/category.aspx?id=smartlogistics (accessed on 30 December 2017).
Character | Description |
---|---|
System | EuroPruning traceability system |
Label name | EuroPruning Label |
Objective of labeling | It is intended to create a label for pruning biomass feedstock capable of ensuring the traceability of pruning quality parameters and guaranteeing to the final user and/or logistic operator that the biomass is in good condition according to defined requirements within the scope of this TS. |
Scope | This document explains the procedures and contents of the new label which is designed within this project framework. It is based on the biomass quality requirements described in Section 2.6. These quality parameters are identified based on objectives of the project and standards describing solid fuel quality parameters such as new European standards EN 14961-1, EN15234:1-2011, and EN14961-1:2010 [21,22,23]. This labeling system does not include the sustainability parameters such as greenhouse gas emission (GHG) and energy use in relation to the pruning biomass supply chain. |
Production rules | Major production and processing rules concerning the pruning biomass under consideration should be identified (for instance whether products are from irrigated farm or not, whether it is processed in the form of bales or chips, and the recommended sizes of bales and chips). |
Designation of origin and product source | Country or area of origin is one of the pieces of information required in a traceability system. The name of farm and country, geographical location, and associated trade contract should be known, as well as the source of product (e.g., wood from vineyards). This identification is based on classification according to standard EN14961-1:2010 [23]. |
Product character | Some key characters of the product have to be included e.g., dimensions of bale (bale size), particle size distribution of chips, and ash content. |
Traceability technology | A quick response (QR) code is implemented in this TS. This traceability system is part of a smart logistics tool developed to optimize the logistics of the whole supply chain management of the pruning biomass supply chain. This smart tool uses a scanner of QR codes and other parts such as a General Packet Radio service [GPRS] wireless system and a unique website-based application platform [6] for the continuity of information flow. The actors (e.g., farmer) who sell their products register all required product quality information via the platform, which generates the QR code, and prints the label with the QR code before the product is loaded for delivery. The QR codes will be scanned (by the transporter) using a scanner integrated in the smart logistics tool which has to be installed on the truck. |
Labeling rules | A paper-based label of a rectangular shape with a length of 150 mm–200 mm and a width of 100 mm–120 mm has been implemented according to recommended rules under Section 2.5. |
Label data elements | Some information to be included in the biomass label: source of biomass (farm name), type of the biomass (e.g., tree pruining, crop residues), seasonal efficiency (continuity of supply), moisture content, ash content, date of harvest, and volumetric density. In this TS, these data elements are included but not indicated on the label. The information is recorded and regenerated via the QR code printed on the label. The company name, QR code, lot number, and unique label code (assigned to the actor) are the key data elements indicated on the label (see Section 2.5). |
Logistics Chain Stage | Pruning Stage | Collection of Pruning | Transport from Farm to the Storage | Storage Stage | Transport from Storage to End User |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank R | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
Activities in labeling system | Documenting data required for traceability (e.g., pruning data, pictures) | Documenting traceable data required at harvesting stage (e.g., bales or chips characteristics); assigning lot number; printing the label and labeling the product | Label reading (scanning); recording traceable data using the smart logistics tool; quality and quantity control | Receiving information regarding new product; quality control; preparing the label and labeling the product. | Label reading; recording data during transport; information transfer; quality control |
Label Element | Description |
---|---|
Shape | Rectangular shape: length of 150 mm–200 mm; width of 100 mm–120 mm |
Lot number | Times New Roman with minimum font size of 20 |
Label code | Times New Roman with minimum font size of 20 |
Company name | Times New Roman with minimum and maximum font sizes of 20 and 26, respectively |
Information | Raw Material Producer | Solid Biofuel Producer | Solid Biofuel Trader | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Normative information (always to be stated) | ||||
Declaration of origin and source | Supplier (label code 1, name, contact information) | X | X | X |
Country/city of origin (country, farm name and location) | X | X | X | |
Contract number | X | X | X | |
Lot number | X | X | X | |
Quantity (tons) | X | X | X | |
Origin and source according to classification from standard EN14961-1:2010 1.1.1 Whole trees without roots (and variety name) 1.1.7 Segregated wood from vineyards and fruit orchards (and variety name) 1.1.8 Blends and mixtures (variety names and share of each as % and/or farm names (source) and share %) | X | X | X | |
Traded form (chips, logs, branches, hog fuel, bale (round/cuboid)) | X | X | ||
Particle size distribution * | X | X | ||
Bale dimension * | X | X | ||
Moisture content (w-%, ar) | X | X | ||
Ash content (w-%, db) | X | X | ||
Density of bale (kg/m3, ar) | X | X | X | |
Bulk density of chips (kg/m3, ar) | X | X | ||
Chemically treated material (YES/NO) | X | X | X | |
Informative information | ||||
Picture | X | X | X | |
Crop characteristics: age, irrigation regime | X | |||
Time from pruning to wood collection (days) | X | |||
Storage stage: Time (days) Piled (dimensions)/spread in small heaps Covered/uncovered Material moved with mechanical means (YES/NO) | X X X X | X X X X | X X X X | |
Contamination with impurities (soil, plastic, metals) (YES/NO) | X | X | X | |
Calorific value (MJ/kg, ar) * | X | X |
Parameter | Class | Recommended Characterstics |
---|---|---|
Particle size distribution of chips | P45A | More than 75% of material between 8 and 45 mm |
Bale size | D1 | 1.2 m diameter, 1.2 m length |
Moisture content | M35 | Moisture content ≤35 w-% ar |
Ash content | A3 | Ash content ≤3 w-% db |
Class | Main Fraction (at Least 75%) mm | Fine Fraction (<3.15 mm), w-% | Coarse Fraction |
---|---|---|---|
P16A P16B | 3.15 ≤ P ≤ 16 mm 3.15 ≤ P ≤ 16 mm | ≤12% ≤12% | ≤3% > 16 mm and all <31.5 mm ≤3% > 45 mm and all <120 mm |
P45A P45B | 8 ≤ P ≤ 45 mm 8 ≤ P ≤ 45 mm | ≤8% ≤8% | ≤6% > 63 mm, max 3.5% > 100 mm, all <120 mm ≤6% > 63 mm, max 3.5% > 100 mm, all <350 mm |
P63 | 8 ≤ P ≤ 63 mm | ≤6% | ≤6% > 100 mm and all <350 mm |
P100 | 16 ≤ P ≤ 100 mm | ≤4% | ≤6% > 200 mm and all <350 mm |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bosona, T.; Gebresenbet, G.; Olsson, S.-O. Traceability System for Improved Utilization of Solid Biofuel from Agricultural Prunings. Sustainability 2018, 10, 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020258
Bosona T, Gebresenbet G, Olsson S-O. Traceability System for Improved Utilization of Solid Biofuel from Agricultural Prunings. Sustainability. 2018; 10(2):258. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020258
Chicago/Turabian StyleBosona, Techane, Girma Gebresenbet, and Sven-Olof Olsson. 2018. "Traceability System for Improved Utilization of Solid Biofuel from Agricultural Prunings" Sustainability 10, no. 2: 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020258
APA StyleBosona, T., Gebresenbet, G., & Olsson, S. -O. (2018). Traceability System for Improved Utilization of Solid Biofuel from Agricultural Prunings. Sustainability, 10(2), 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020258