Next Article in Journal
Evaluating Sampling Designs for Demersal Fish Communities
Next Article in Special Issue
Latent Drivers of Landscape Transformation in Eastern Europe: Past, Present and Future
Previous Article in Journal
Quantifying the Economic Effects of Biogas Installations for Organic Waste from Agro-Industrial Sector
Previous Article in Special Issue
Agro-Forest Management and Soil Degradation in Mediterranean Environments: Towards a Strategy for Sustainable Land Use in Vineyard and Olive Cropland
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 10
Issue 7
10.3390/su10072584
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clustering or Scattering? The Spatial Distribution of Cropland in a Metropolitan Region, 1960–2010

by
Andrea Colantoni
1,
Ilaria Zambon
1,
Maria Gras
2,
Enrico Maria Mosconi
3,
Alessandra Stefanoni
3 and
Luca Salvati
2,*
1
Department of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, Via San Camillo de Lellis, I-01100 Viterbo, Italy
2
Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Forestry Research Centre, I-52100 Arezzo, Italy
3
Department of Economics, Engineering, Society and Business Organization, Tuscia University, Via del Paradiso 47, I-01100 Viterbo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(7), 2584; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072584
Submission received: 22 May 2018 / Revised: 19 June 2018 / Accepted: 19 July 2018 / Published: 23 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Small-Scale Energy Conversion of Agro-Forestry Residues for Local Benefits and European Competitiveness)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This article presents empirical results of a multivariate analysis run with the aim to identify (apparent and latent) socioeconomic transformations that shape the distribution pattern of cropland in a metropolitan region of southern Europe (Athens, Greece) over a sufficiently long time interval spanning from 1960 to 2010. The study area is representative of monocentric cities expanding in an unregulated fashion and experiencing sequential cycles of economic growth and recession. Percent share of cropland in total municipal area increased moderately over time. A non-linear relationship with the distance from downtown Athens was also observed, indicating that the highest rates of cropland were observed at a distance ranging between 20 and 30 km from the inner city. A multivariate regression was run by decade at each municipality of the study area using 11 predictors with the aim to identify the factors most associated with cropland decline along urban fringes. Distance from downtown Athens, soil and climate quality, population growth rate, and competing land use were the most relevant factors correlated with cropland expansion (or decline) in the study area. Competing land use was particularly important for cropland decline in a first urbanization phase (1960–1980), while population growth rate—and hence an increased human pressure—was positively associated with agricultural areas in a subsequent phase (1990–2010). In these regards, per capita urban land had a non-linear spatial behavior, being correlated negatively with cropland in 1960 and 1970 and positively in 2010, possibly indicating a moderate change from a monocentric model towards a more dispersed metropolitan configuration impacting distribution of agricultural areas. Empirical findings of this study suggest that effective strategies supporting peri-urban agriculture require a comprehensive knowledge of the local socioeconomic context and relevant biophysical conditions—specifically focusing on the dominant soil and climate attributes.

1. Introduction

Rural areas and the related cropping systems play an important role in ecosystem services, improving quality of metropolitan environments [1,2,3,4]. Despite the importance of cropland in peri-urban contexts, a progressive reduction in size, production, and functionality has been observed in representative metropolitan regions because of urban spillover [5,6]. Wildland–urban interfaces are particularly vulnerable to cropland decline and physical degradation because of the increasing anthropogenic pressure [7,8,9]. In Mediterranean Europe, interfaces are particularly rich in animal and plant biodiversity, as well as historical and cultural heritage, being constituted by heterogeneous peri-urban areas with mixed human settlements of different ages and natural-agricultural habitats forming a diversified landscape mosaic [10,11,12]. Reflecting unsustainable use of land, rural-urban migration, abandonment of cropland, and land marginalization, urban expansion is probably the most impacting factor on cropland, determining landscape transformations and fragmentation of non-urban land use types [2,13,14]. Moreover, land use modifications of fringe land may severely impact cropland, resulting in forest, shrubland, and pasture expansion, due to spontaneous or human-driven processes of re-naturalization [15,16]. However, the main socioeconomic forces at the base of landscape transformations and the underlying mechanisms linking local communities with specific environmental characteristics of rural areas are mostly underrepresented in the Mediterranean basin and still need specific investigation covering both socioeconomic and biophysical issues [17,18,19,20].
In such dynamic contexts, identifying relevant factors (and understanding the underlying processes) that drive changes in the use of land is key to sustainable management of fringe land [1,2]. Despite indicators of land take having been extensively developed in recent times [21], only a few studies have analyzed complex interactions between land use and transformations of fringe land driven by urbanization [1,11,13,22,23]. Based on these premises, this article illustrates a comprehensive analysis of cropland distribution over space in a Mediterranean European region (Athens, Greece) from 1960 to 2010. Athens is considered a representative case of (rapidly expanding) Mediterranean cities with a typical monocentric organization and more recent processes of urban sprawl into traditional rural areas [24]. By adopting a multivariate strategy to analyze multi-domain indicators of urban expansion [4], our study identifies clustering or scattering patterns in the spatial distribution of cropland, and the most relevant factors involved in such trends, as a contribution to sustainable land management in expanding metropolitan regions of advanced countries.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The Athens metropolitan region extends approximately 3000 km2 and is administered by 114 municipal authorities: 58 urban municipalities belonging to the conurbation of Athens-Piraeus and 56 rural municipalities (Figure 1). The landform consists primarily of uplands and mountains; lowlands are concentrated mainly in the central area of Athens. The prevailing climate regime in the area is Mediterranean dry, with annual rainfall ranging between 400 mm and 500 mm and annual temperatures averaging 18–19 °C. Nowadays, the area is densely populated (4400 inhabitants/km2). From 1951 to 2011, population density increased by about 2900 inhabitants/km2 with a more balanced settlement distribution over space and the formation of growing poles outside the consolidated city [25]. After World War II, Athens and Piraeus expanded as the main urban poles thanks to the concentration of service activities (Athens) and industrial functions (Piraeus) [4,26]. Since the early 1990s, the Greater Athens area experienced a process of urban de-concentration, with expansion of discontinuous fringe settlements [1,27]. The development of new urban cores was observed [4,8,9,28,29,30] in Messoghia (a region centered in the municipalities of Markopoulo Messoghias, and Spata), which is considered the largest sprawling area in Attica [29], and in the Athens north-east district centered in the municipalities of Maroussi and Kifissià, where urban development driven by the 2004 Olympic Games resulted in extensive soil sealing and an increased rate of land consumption [31].

2.2. Land Use Analysis and Cropland Data

The percent share of cropland in total municipal area, taken as the dependent variable in this study, was derived from aggregate data of (i) a land use census held by the Greek Statistical Institute for the years 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000; and (ii) Urban Atlas (UA) database referring to 2010. According to Salvati et al. [23], the accuracy of the collected data was evaluated by comparison with additional data sources that provide an independent estimate of cropland expansion (or decline) at a fine grained spatial scale in the study area: (i) a soil map produced by the Institute of Geology and Soil Chemistry (Piraeus) delimitating the Athens urban area for 1948; (ii) the LaCoast (LC) project database mapping land use in coastal regions of Europe for 1975 [30]; (iii) Corine Land Cover (CLC) maps referring to 1990 and 2000 [32,33]; (iv) the pan-European GlobCorine map referring to 2009 [34]; and (v) prefecture-level data on cropland derived from the Greek National Census of Agriculture for 1961, 1970, 1980, 1990, 1999, and 2009.

2.3. Territorial Variables

A total of 11 variables describing population dynamics, topography, urban structure, competing land use (i.e., forest), and climate and soil quality were considered additional context variables in this study and were derived from official statistics (various data sources) at the municipal scale (Table 1). According to Salvati and Serra [35], these variables were considered with the aim to provide a comprehensive assessment of the socioeconomic and territorial characteristics of municipalities in the study area, with a possible (direct or indirect) impact on cropland growth or decline. Following a previous study by Tomao et al. [36], these variables were adopted in regression analysis as predictors of the spatial distribution of cropland over a temporal period spanning from the early 1960s to the early 2010s.
Aggregate data on resident populations (municipal scale) were derived from the National Census of Population carried out by the National Statistical Service of Greece (NSSG) at each decade (1961, 1971, 1981, 1991, 2001, and 2011) and were used to calculate per capita built-up area at the same spatial scale (Urb). According to [37], Urb was considered an indicator of urban land-use efficiency. Population growth (annual percent rate) was considered a proxy of urban expansion. Topographic and territorial variables include specific descriptors of landscape and urban structure (average elevation, proximity to the sea coast, municipal area, and distance to key urban nodes such as Athens, Piraeus, Maroussi, and Markopoulo Messoghias). Topographic variables were measured using ArcGIS software (ESRI Inc., Redwoods, CA, USA). Two variables describing quality of soil and climate were also calculated from a specific dataset released by the European Environment Agency [13]. Soil and climate quality were evaluated with the final aim to ascertain the specific contribution to local-scale land suitability to agriculture [38]. Data on forest areas were derived from computation on land use census for the years 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000 and Urban Atlas (UA) map referring to 2010 [36].

2.4. Exploratory Data Analysis

Data analysis was organized in two steps: (i) exploratory analysis, based on univariate and multivariate approaches, with the objective to analyze long-term changes (50 years) in the spatial distribution of cropland in the study area and (ii) regression models, investigating medium-term changes (10 years) in cropland expansion (or decline) and identifying the main forces at the base of such transformations. Descriptive statistics (including average and median, coefficient of variation, maximum value, coefficient of variation, kurtosis, and asymmetry) describing the spatial distribution of the dependent variable in the municipalities belonging to the study area were calculated at the beginning (1960) and the end of the study period (2010). The relationship between the dependent variable and the linear distance from downtown Athens was illustrated using scatterplots at the same two time points and adapting a square goodness-of-fit polynomial curve to the observations (n = 114). A hierarchical clustering (using Ward’s agglomeration rule based on a Euclidean distance matrix) was run for the same time points (1960 and 2010) with the aim to group separately (i) variables and (ii) municipalities of the study area on the basis of their similarity patterns [38], thus allowing for the identification of specific territorial profiles associated with high and low levels of percent share of cropland in total municipal area [39]. Based on descriptive and multivariate techniques, a statistical analysis run on aggregate data at the beginning and the end of a long enough time period—as in the present study—may provide an enhanced interpretation of metropolitan transformations with impact on land use distribution [40].

2.5. Regression Analysis

A multiple linear regression analysis based on ordinary least square estimation was finally performed for each time point (1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010) with Agr as the dependent variable and the 11 predictors reported in Table 1. By using a forward stepwise approach for the selection of un-correlated predictors, this analysis allowed for the identification of changes in the most relevant factors associated with cropland dynamics over time, ranking the individual predictors based on their (direct or indirect) influence on cropland distribution over space and reducing the overall redundancy in the multivariate dataset [35]. All variables were standardized prior to regression analysis. Significant variables were selected fixing F-to-remove and F-to-enter thresholds equal to 3 and 1.5, respectively. Adjusted R2 was calculated separately for each regression to assess the overall goodness-of-fit of each selected model. Moreover, a Fisher-Snedecor F test with p < 0.001 was also run to verify significance against the null hypothesis of a non-significant model. A Durbin-Watson statistic was applied separately to the residuals from the six least squares regressions, testing for serial correlation in the residuals. Values of Durbin-Watson statistics close to 2 (e.g., in the range between 1.5 and 2.5) indicate negligible auto-correlation.

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive Statistics

Descriptive statistics and maps showing the spatio-temporal evolution of the dependent variable (percent share of cropland in total municipal area) are reported in Figure 1 and Table 2, considering municipalities as the elementary spatial domain. Descriptive statistics outline a moderate increase in cropland surface from 1960 to 2010 (from 37% to 39% on average). Median and average values are rather similar and indicate a substantial regularity in the distribution of the dependent variable over time (Table 2), with a spatial variability decreasing between 1960 and 2010. The maximum value of the dependent variable was decreasing slightly (96% in 1960 and 87% in 2010), although the percent share of municipalities with cropland in total municipalities increased from 84% (1960) to 87% (2010).
The spatial distribution of percent share of cropland in total municipal area was mapped in Figure 1, indicating a substantial stability of cropland across the study region. Moderate increases or decreases at a local scale are more likely driven by place-specific socioeconomic factors and/or biophysical conditions. Agricultural areas constituted a buffer to urban expansion, competing with forest land use in more remote places of the metropolitan region. The rural municipalities with the largest cropland surfaces are those situated in traditional agricultural districts such as Megara, Thriasio, Messoghia, and Marathon. Such trends highlight complex transformations of the peri-urban Athens landscape in the last 50 years. The relationship between cropland area and distance from downtown was non-linear, with the highest values observed at a distance ranging between 30 km and 40 km from downtown Athens. The goodness-of-fit of this relationship improved significantly over time, indicating an increased urban-rural polarization at the end of the study period (Figure 2). Only a few municipalities experienced values of the study variable less than 10%, suggesting that cropland is a rather ubiquitous land use not only in rural districts but also in peri-urban marginal areas.

3.2. Hierarchical Clustering

Cluster analysis identified a distinctive similarity pattern for the contextual variables at the beginning and the end of the study period. Cropland clustered together with the distance from all the urban nodes considered in this work (Athens, Piraeus, Maroussi, Markopoulo M.) for 1960, indicating a monocentric structure typically oriented along the urban gradient. Considering 2010 data, cropland clustered together with per capita built-up area and distance from Athens, Piraeus, and Maroussi only. These results suggest a moderate departure from a monocentric structure, outlining instead a more complex spatial interplay between agriculture and low-density settlements that results in a mixed and heterogeneous fringe landscape. Consistently, municipalities in the study area were classified into homogeneous classes (Figure 3) grouping (i) urban municipalities (left side of each graph)—primarily belonging to the Greater Athens area—and (ii) mixed peri-urban and rural municipalities (right side of each graph). Strictly rural municipalities, located over 30 km from downtown Athens and with a share of cropland in total municipal area systematically over 50%, were grouped into a specific class (dashed circle, right side of each graph). Only minor differences in hierarchical clusters were detected for 1960 and 2010.

3.3. Multiple Regression

Forward stepwise multiple regression (Table 3) identified (and ranked the impact of) the most relevant predictors influencing the dependent variable (Agr) at each time point investigated in this work. The model’s goodness-of-fit increased over time, reaching a particularly high adjusted R2 (0.75) for 2010. Cropland area increased with the distance from downtown Athens for the whole time period investigated in this study. However, the impact of this predictor was largely variable over time, being the highest in 1960 and decreasing progressively in the following decades thanks to emerging suburbanization processes. A new increase of the regression coefficients was observed for the early 1990s in parallel with a period of huge urban expansion and a final moderate decrease was observed for the early 2010s. The distance from Piraeus explained some of the additional variance observed in selected models and may indicate the period of maximum consolidation of the monocentric model (1970, 1980). The spatial relationship between forests and cropland was negative and significant only for the first decades under investigation (1960, 1970, 1980). Lower regression coefficients indicate a progressive reduction in land use competition between forests and cropland, because of the huge decline of forests in the study area. Population growth rate was positively associated with cropland since the early 1990s; this result is reflected in fringe landscapes where expanding settlements and cropping systems frequently coexist. Distance from Markopoulo Messoghias was negatively associated with the dependent variable for 1970 and 1980, indicating the period of maximum expansion of cropland in a traditional rural district such as Messoghia. Suburbanization-driven landscape transformations in a period immediately following the 1980s may explain the non-significant impact of this predictor in the following decades. Distance from Maroussi (the modern business district of Athens, expanding with the Olympic Games) was relatively less important and significant only for the 1960 and 2000 models. Climate quality had a role in explaining a high level of cropland at the municipal scale only in specific years (1960, 1990, 2000). Soil quality was associated with a higher level of cropland in the last two decades (2000, 2010). Finally, municipal size was occasionally associated with cropland area, significantly impacting the dependent variable only for 1970 and 1980.

4. Discussion

Our study proposes an integrated analysis of cropland distribution over space and land use changes in a metropolitan region, providing a relevant knowledge base with implications for urban studies, agricultural policy, and regional planning [3,6,10,22,34,41,42,43,44,45]. Specific socioeconomic and biophysical factors influencing cropland distribution have been identified through an original procedure based on multivariate exploratory statistics [2,4]. Despite massive urban expansion, our results showed a moderate (and spatially-heterogeneous) increase in cropland over time, mainly at the expenses of forest areas [46,47,48]. Fringe landscapes became more heterogeneous and mixed, reflecting a latent interplay between low-density settlements and medium-small farms specialized in tree and garden crops [1,14]. Cropland constituted a relevant part of fringe land, and its transformations have a direct impact on the structure of natural-based infrastructures surrounding Athens.
Earlier studies have clearly evidenced how suburbanization has negatively affected the structure of landscapes, reducing the overall environmental quality of the region [13,49]. An increasing polarization in fringe mixed areas and more remote districts was observed during the investigated time period. The monocentric model typical of the study area has influenced markedly the spatial distribution of cropland, evidencing the importance of traditional agricultural systems as a latent urban-forest interface [14,16,50]. At the same time, urban sprawl impacted cropland directly by fragmenting agricultural utilized area and partly disconnecting pristine agricultural-natural districts. Various forms of infrastructure (including the Athens International Airport built-up in the traditional agricultural district of Messoghia) were also important in this process.
As far as factors associated with changes in land use are concerned [51], the results from the multivariate analysis allow for the evaluation of where, when, and how increasing complexity occurred in Athens’ landscape over time. Basically, the distance from downtown Athens remained one of the most relevant predictors of the spatial distribution of cropland in the study area. Considering the spatial legacy of a compact and monocentric urban form—only partly altered by recent suburbanization—Athens is a representative example for other European cities experiencing similar development patterns [14,22].
In these regards, our study clarifies the relationship between land use and the local context [26,52,53], identifying the variables most associated with cropland [54]. The significance of the empirical findings of this study for future land use decisions within the local context (considering current economic, political, and soil/climate trends) lies exactly in this issue. Results of our study confirm that the Athens metropolitan region is sensitive to environmental degradation [8,9,55] because of the progressive urbanization of rural fringe [38]. This suggests the role of multi-scalar sustainable land management policies [56,57,58,59,60,61] in reducing the impact of urban sprawl on cropland [2,13,17,24]. At the same time, a more effective protection of traditional agriculture is required, especially for rural and remote districts [62]. Although the study may represent a good reference either in methodological and results direction for further appraisal of the investigated approach in other European contexts, further studies are required to provide a better understanding of biophysical drivers that are not directly considered in this study, such as wildfires. Moreover, the adopted variables could be integrated with some additional economic indicators, especially related to the regional agriculture system and related market relations. An extensive investigation of methodological limitations and potential sources of error considering the selected indicators and omitted variables is also relevant to advance landscape and regional studies. In this regard, a specific approach based on spatially-explicit models (e.g., considering spatial autocorrelation) is a possible solution for overcoming the implicit problems related with geographical data. Finally, considerable efforts are still needed to design tools capable of guiding decision makers towards the sustainable use of land [63]. Identification and long-term monitoring of urban-cropland interfaces is the basis for a more effective strategy of sustainable land management and planning.

5. Conclusions

In a framework of growing metropolization processes and related land use change that affects Europe, this article allows an original interpretation of land use change, based on understanding the impact of local-scale (socioeconomic and biophysical) contexts on cropland distribution over space in a Mediterranean urban region. The empirical findings of this study contribute towards highlighting two fundamental points in landscape studies: (i) despite huge expansions of residential settlements in rural areas, cropland increased moderately in Athens, demonstrating a strong relevance of agricultural functions compared to other non-urban land uses such as forests (e.g., woodland); (ii) cropland expansion in fringe land may reflect new forms of urban-rural mixes, requiring innovative monitoring approaches, dedicated spatial planning, and specific development policies. The analysis clarifies the multi-faceted (agri-environmental) role of cropland in metropolitan contexts (e.g., providing together ecosystem services, fresh food, and leisure activities). Supporting that role with innovative food policies and regional agricultural market enhancement is imperative in rapidly evolving metropolitan regions.

Author Contributions

M.G., A.C., and E.M.M. identified research questions. A.S. and L.S. analyzed the data. A.C., I.Z., and L.S. wrote the paper.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Duvernoy, I.; Zambon, I.; Sateriano, A.; Salvati, L. Pictures from the other side of the fringe: Urban growth and peri-urban agriculture in a post-industrial city (Toulouse, France). J. Rural Stud. 2018, 57, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pili, S.; Grigoriadis, E.; Carlucci, M.; Clemente, M.; Salvati, L. Towards sustainable growth? A multi-criteria assessment of (changing) urban forms. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 76, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sanesi, G.; Colangelo, G.; Lafortezza, R.; Calvo, E.; Davies, C. Urban green infrastructure and urban forests: A case study of the Metropolitan Area of Milan. Landsc. Res. 2017, 42, 164–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zambon, I.; Benedetti, A.; Ferrara, C.; Salvati, L. Soil Matters? A Multivariate Analysis of Socioeconomic Constraints to Urban Expansion in Mediterranean Europe. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 146, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chas-Amil, M.L.; Touza, J.; García-Martínez, E. Forest fires in the wildland–urban interface: A spatial analysis of forest fragmentation and human impacts. Appl. Geogr. 2013, 43, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zipperer, W.C.; Foresman, T.W.; Walker, S.P.; Daniel, C.T. Ecological consequences of fragmentation and deforestation in an urban landscape: A case study. Urban Ecosyst. 2012, 15, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Carlucci, M.; Grigoriadis, E.; Rontos, K.; Salvati, L. Revisiting a hegemonic concept: Long-term ‘Mediterranean urbanization’ in between city re-polarization and metropolitan decline. Appl. Spat. Anal. Policy 2017, 10, 347–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Munafò, M.; Salvati, L.; Zitti, M. Estimating soil sealing rate at national level—Italy as a case study. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 26, 137–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Salvati, L. Monitoring high-quality soil consumption driven by urban pressure in a growing city (Rome, Italy). Cities 2013, 31, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Antrop, M. Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2004, 67, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Salvati, L.; Zambon, I.; Chelli, F.M.; Serra, P. Do spatial patterns of urbanization and land consumption reflect different socioeconomic contexts in Europe? Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 625, 722–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zambon, I.; Colantoni, A.; Cecchini, M.; Mosconi, E.M. Rethinking sustainability within the viticulture realities integrating economy, landscape and energy. Sustainability 2018, 10, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Colantoni, A.; Grigoriadis, E.; Sateriano, A.; Venanzoni, G.; Salvati, L. Cities as selective land predators? A lesson on urban growth, deregulated planning and sprawl containment. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 545, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Salvati, L.; Gargiulo Morelli, V.; Rontos, K.; Sabbi, A. Latent Exurban Development: City Expansion along the Rural-To-Urban Gradient in Growing and Declining Regions of Southern Europe. Urban Geogr. 2013, 34, 376–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Barbati, A.; Corona, P.; Salvati, L.; Gasparella, L. Natural forest expansion into suburban countryside: Gained ground for a green infrastructure? Urban For. Urban Green. 2013, 12, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Colantoni, A.; Mavrakis, A.; Sorgi, T.; Salvati, L. Towards a ‘polycentric’ landscape? Reconnecting fragments into an integrated network of coastal forests in Rome. Rend. Lincei 2015, 26, 615–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Salvati, L.; Zitti, M.; Ceccarelli, T. Integrating economic and environmental indicators in the assessment of desertification risk: A case study. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2008, 6, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ferrara, A.; Salvati, L.; Sabbi, A.; Colantoni, A. Urbanization, Soil Quality and Rural Areas: Towards a Spatial Mismatch? Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 478, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Serra, P.; Vera, A.; Tulla, A.F.; Salvati, L. Beyond urban-rural dichotomy: Exploring socioeconomic and land-use processes of change in Spain (1991–2011). Appl. Geogr. 2014, 55, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Karamesouti, M.; Detsis, V.; Kounalaki, A.; Vasiliou, P.; Salvati, L.; Kosmas, C. Land-use and land degradation processes affecting soil resources: Evidence from a traditional Mediterranean cropland (Greece). Catena 2015, 132, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hasse, J.E.; Lathrop, R.G. Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl. Appl. Geogr. 2003, 23, 159–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Catalán, B.; Sauri, D.; Serra, P. Urban sprawl in the Mediterranean? Patterns of growth and change in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region 1993–2000. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 85, 174–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cuadrado-Ciuraneta, S.; Durà-Guimerà, A.; Salvati, L. Not only tourism: Unravelling suburbanization, second-home expansion and “rural” sprawl in Catalonia, Spain. Urban Geogr. 2017, 38, 66–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zambon, I.; Serra, P.; Sauri, D.; Carlucci, M.; Salvati, L. Beyond the ‘Mediterranean city’: Socioeconomic disparities and urban sprawl in three Southern European cities. Geogr. Ann. Ser. B Hum. Geogr. 2017, 99, 319–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rontos, K.; Grigoriadis, S.; Sateriano, A.; Syrmali, M.; Vavouras, I.; Salvati, L. Lost in Protest, Found in Segregation: Divided Cities in the Light of the 2015 ‘Oki’ Referendum in Greece. City Cult. Soc. 2016, 7, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chorianopoulos, I.; Pagonis, T.; Koukoulas, S.; Drymoniti, S. Planning, competitiveness and sprawl in the Mediterranean city: The case of Athens. Cities 2010, 27, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chorianopoulos, I.; Tsilimigkas, G.; Koukoulas, S.; Balatsos, T. The shift to competitiveness and a new phase of sprawl in the Mediterranean city: Enterprises guiding growth in Messoghia—Athens. Cities 2014, 39, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Couch, C.; Petschel-Held, G.; Leontidou, L. Urban Sprawl in Europe: Landscapes, Land-Use Change and Policy; Blackwell: London, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  29. Perdigao, V.; Christensen, S. The Lacoast Atlas: Land Cover Changes in European Coastal Zones; Joint Research Centre: Ispra, Italy, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  30. EEA. Urban Sprawl in Europe—The Ignored Challenge; Report No. 10; Joint Research Centre: Ispra, Italy, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  31. Di Feliciantonio, C.; Salvati, L. ‘Southern’ alternatives of urban diffusion: Investigating settlement characteristics and socioeconomic patterns in three Mediterranean regions. Tijdschr. Econ. Soc. Geogr. 2015, 106, 453–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. EEA. Mapping Guide for a European Urban Atlas; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  33. Salvati, L. Exurban Development and Landscape Diversification in a Mediterranean Peri-urban Area. Scott. Geogr. J. 2014, 130, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Carrus, G.; Scopelliti, M.; Lafortezza, R.; Colangelo, G.; Ferrini, F.; Salbitano, F.; Agrimi, M.; Portoghesi, L.; Semenzato, P.; Sanesi, G. Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2015, 134, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Salvati, L.; Serra, P. Estimating rapidity of change in complex urban systems: A multidimensional, local-scale approach. Geogr. Anal. 2016, 48, 132–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tomao, A.; Quatrini, V.; Corona, P.; Ferrara, A.; Lafortezza, R.; Salvati, L. Resilient landscapes in Mediterranean urban areas: Understanding factors influencing forest trends. Environ. Res. 2017, 156, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zitti, M.; Ferrara, C.; Perini, L.; Carlucci, M.; Salvati, L. Long-term Urban Growth and Land-use Efficiency in Southern Europe: Implications for Sustainable Land Management. Sustainability 2015, 7, 3359–3385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Salvati, L.; Gemmiti, R.; Perini, L. Land degradation and the Mediterranean urban areas: An unexplored link with planning? Area 2012, 44, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Salvati, L.; Carlucci, M. The economic and environmental performances of rural districts in Italy: Are competitiveness and sustainability compatible targets? Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70, 2446–2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Salvati, L. Agro-forest landscape and the ‘fringe’ city: A multivariate assessment of land-use changes in a sprawling region and implications for planning. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 490, 715–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Perrin, C.; Nougarèdes, B.; Sini, L.; Branduini, P.; Salvati, L. Governance changes in peri-urban farmland protection following decentralisation: A comparison between Montpellier (France) and Rome (Italy). Land Use Policy 2018, 70, 535–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Moreira, F.; Viedma, O.; Arianoutsou, M.; Curt, T.; Koutsias, N.; Rigolot, F.; Barbati, A.; Corona, P.; Vaz, P.; Xanthopoulos, G.; et al. Landscape wildfire interactions in southern Europe: Implications for landscape management. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 2389–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Radeloff, V.C.; Hammer, R.B.; Stewart, S.I.; Fried, J.S.; Holcomb, S.S.; Mckeefry, J.F. The wildland-urban interface in the United States. Ecol. Appl. 2005, 15, 799–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Arabatzis, G. European Union, Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and the afforestation of agricultural land in Greece. New Medit 2005, 4, 48–54. [Google Scholar]
  45. Dobbs, C.; Kendal, D.; Nitschke, C.R. Multiple ecosystem services and disservices of the urban forest establishing their connections with landscape structure and sociodemographics. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 43, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mather, A.S. Forest transition theory and the reforesting of Scotland. Scott. Geogr. Mag. 2004, 120, 83–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Frenkel, A. The potential effect of national growth-management policy on urban sprawl and the depletion of open spaces and farmland. Land Use Policy 2004, 21, 357–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Koutsias, N.; Martínez-Fernández, J.; Allgöwer, B. Do factors causing wildfires vary in space? Evidence from geographically weighted regression. GISci. Remote Sens. 2010, 47, 221–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zomeni, M.; Tzanopoulos, J.; Pantis, J.D. Historical analysis of landscape change using remote sensing techniques: An explanatory tool for agricultural transformation in Greek rural areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 86, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Novara, A.; Gristina, L.; Sala, G.; Galati, A.; Crescimanno, M.; Cerdà, A.; La Mantia, T. Agricultural land abandonment in Mediterranean environment provides ecosystem services via soil carbon sequestration. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 576, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Colantoni, A.; Delfanti, L.; Recanatesi, F.; Tolli, M.; Lord, R. Land use planning for utilizing biomass residues in Tuscia Romana (central Italy): Preliminary results of a multi criteria analysis to create an agro-energy district. Land Use Policy 2016, 50, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Delfanti, L.; Colantoni, A.; Recanatesi, F.; Bencardino, M.; Sateriano, A.; Zambon, I.; Salvati, L. Solar plants, environmental degradation and local socioeconomic contexts: A case study in a Mediterranean country. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2016, 61, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kelly, C.; Ferrara, A.; Wilson, G.A.; Ripullone, F.; Nolè, A.; Harmer, N.; Salvati, L. Community resilience and land degradation in forest and shrubland socio-ecological systems: Evidence in Gorgoglione, Basilicata, Italy. Land Use Policy 2015, 46, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kosmas, C.; Karamesouti, M.; Kounalaki, K.; Detsis, V.; Vassiliou, P.; Salvati, L. Land degradation and long-term changes in agro-pastoral systems: An empirical analysis of ecological resilience in Asteroussia—Crete (Greece). Catena 2016, 147, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Salvati, L.; Zitti, M. Land degradation in the Mediterranean basin: Linking bio-physical and economic factors into an ecological perspective. Biota—J. Biol. Ecol. 2005, 5, 67–77. [Google Scholar]
  56. Monarca, D.; Colantoni, A.; Cecchini, M.; Longo, L.; Vecchione, L.; Carlini, M.; Manzo, A. Energy characterization and gasification of biomass derived by hazelnut cultivation: Analysis of produced syngas by gas chromatography. Math. Probl. Eng. 2012, 2012, 102914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Monarca, D.; Cecchini, M.; Colantoni, A. Plant for the production of chips and pellet: Technical and economic aspects of a case study in the central Italy. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, Santander, Spain, 20–23 June 2011; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 296–306. [Google Scholar]
  58. Monarca, D.; Cecchini, M.; Guerrieri, M.; Colantoni, A. Conventional and alternative use of biomasses derived by hazelnut cultivation and processing. In Proceedings of the VII International Congress on Hazelnut 845, Viterbo, Italy, 23 June 2008; pp. 627–634. [Google Scholar]
  59. Boubaker, K.; Colantoni, A.; Marucci, A.; Longo, L.; Gambella, F.; Cividino, S.; Cecchini, M. Perspective and potential of CO2: A focus on potentials for renewable energy conversion in the Mediterranean basin. Renew. Energy 2016, 90, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pari, L.; Brambilla, M.; Bisaglia, C.; Del Giudice, A.; Croce, S.; Salerno, M.; Gallucci, F. Poplar wood chip storage: Effect of particle size and breathable covering on drying dynamics and biofuel quality. Biomass Bioenergy 2015, 81, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Carlini, M.; Mosconi, E.M.; Castellucci, S.; Villarini, M.; Colantoni, A. An Economical Evaluation of Anaerobic Digestion Plants Fed with Organic Agro-Industrial Waste. Energies 2017, 10, 1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ceccarelli, T.; Bajocco, S.; Perini, L.; Salvati, L. Urbanisation and Land Take of High Quality Agricultural Soils—Exploring Long-term Land Use Changes and Land Capability in Northern Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2014, 8, 181–192. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kazemzadeh-Zow, A.; Zanganeh Shahraki, S.; Salvati, L.; Neisani Samani, N. A Spatial Zoning Approach to Calibrate and Validate Urban Growth Models. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2017, 31, 763–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sustainability 10 02584 g001 550
Figure 1. Municipal boundaries in the Athens metropolitan region (a), its position in Europe (b), and classification of the Athens region in urban (black and rural (white) municipalities (c); percent share of cropland in total municipal area by year and municipality (1960: (d); 2010: (e)).
Figure 1. Municipal boundaries in the Athens metropolitan region (a), its position in Europe (b), and classification of the Athens region in urban (black and rural (white) municipalities (c); percent share of cropland in total municipal area by year and municipality (1960: (d); 2010: (e)).
Sustainability 10 02584 g001
Sustainability 10 02584 g002 550
Figure 2. The relationship between percent share of cropland in total municipal area and the distance from downtown Athens (a): 1960; (b): 2010).
Figure 2. The relationship between percent share of cropland in total municipal area and the distance from downtown Athens (a): 1960; (b): 2010).
Sustainability 10 02584 g002
Sustainability 10 02584 g003a 550Sustainability 10 02584 g003b 550
Figure 3. Hierarchical clustering of variables (a) and municipalities (b) in the study area ((left): 1960, (right): 2010); dotted circles indicate strictly urban municipalities (c) and mixed peri-urban/rural municipalities (d).
Figure 3. Hierarchical clustering of variables (a) and municipalities (b) in the study area ((left): 1960, (right): 2010); dotted circles indicate strictly urban municipalities (c) and mixed peri-urban/rural municipalities (d).
Sustainability 10 02584 g003aSustainability 10 02584 g003b
Table
Table 1. List of variables considered in the present study (percent share of cropland in total municipal area is the dependent variable in regression models).
Table 1. List of variables considered in the present study (percent share of cropland in total municipal area is the dependent variable in regression models).
AcronymVariableMeasurement UnitSourceTime Interval
AgrShare of cropland in total municipal area%Census of land-use1960–2010
ForShare of forests in total municipal area|||
GroAnnual population growth rate|Census of population1961–2011
AreaMunicipal surface areakm2Territorial statistics1960–2010
UrbPer capita built-up aream2Census of land-use|
EleAverage municipal elevationMCensus of populationOnce per time
SeaProximity to the sea coast0: internal; 1: coastalTerritorial statistics|
dAthDistance from AthensKmOur elaboration|
dPirDistance from Piraeus|||
dMarDistance from Maroussi|||
dMakDistance from Markopoulo M.|||
CqiClimate quality index0–1Europ. Env. Agency|
SqiSoil quality index|||
Table
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of percent share of cropland in total municipal area by year.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of percent share of cropland in total municipal area by year.
Statistic19602010
Average36.938.6
Median35.240.3
Median to average0.961.04
Coefficient of variation0.860.80
Maximum value96.088.6
Municipalities with cropland (%)83.687.0
Asymmetry0.270.09
Kurtosis−1.39−1.47
Table
Table 3. Results of forward stepwise multiple regressions with percent share of cropland in total municipal area as the dependent variable (see Table 1 for acronyms).
Table 3. Results of forward stepwise multiple regressions with percent share of cropland in total municipal area as the dependent variable (see Table 1 for acronyms).
VariableBetaStd. Errort-Statisticp-Level
1960: Adj-R2 = 0.590, F(5,109) = 33.9, p < 0.001; D-W test = 1.87
dAth1.3020.1359.60.000
For−0.4970.071−7.00.000
dMar−0.6030.128−4.70.000
Cqi0.1550.0652.40.018
Urb−0.1280.062−2.10.042
1970: Adj-R2 = 0.594, F(6,108) = 28.8, p < 0.001; D-W test = 1.74
dAth0.4180.1632.60.012
For−0.4670.070−6.70.000
dPir0.5070.1513.40.001
Area0.1570.0722.20.031
dMak−0.1650.075−2.20.030
Urb−0.1340.066−2.00.044
1980: Adj-R2 = 0.546, F(5,109) = 28.4, p < 0.001; D-W test = 1.64
dAth0.3960.1712.30.022
For−0.3740.074−5.10.000
dPir0.4100.1582.60.011
Area0.2190.0762.90.005
dMak−0.1440.078−1.90.050
1990: Adj-R2 = 0.656, F(3,111) = 73.5 p < 0.001, D-W test = 1.92
dAth0.7430.06012.50.000
Gro0.2040.0593.50.001
Cqi0.1360.0562.40.017
2000: Adj-R2 = 0.693, F(5,109) = 52.6, p < 0.001; D-W test = 2.05
dAth0.9800.1168.40.000
Gro0.1550.0602.60.011
Sqi0.1670.0553.10.003
Cqi0.1130.0542.10.041
dMar−0.2260.111−2.00.044
2010: Adj-R2 = 0.749, F(4,110) = 86.0, p < 0.001; D-W test = 2.00
dAth0.5650.0807.10.000
Sqi0.3050.0486.30.000
Gro0.2510.0485.20.000
Urb0.2720.0803.40.001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Colantoni, A.; Zambon, I.; Gras, M.; Mosconi, E.M.; Stefanoni, A.; Salvati, L. Clustering or Scattering? The Spatial Distribution of Cropland in a Metropolitan Region, 1960–2010. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2584. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072584

AMA Style

Colantoni A, Zambon I, Gras M, Mosconi EM, Stefanoni A, Salvati L. Clustering or Scattering? The Spatial Distribution of Cropland in a Metropolitan Region, 1960–2010. Sustainability. 2018; 10(7):2584. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072584

Chicago/Turabian Style

Colantoni, Andrea, Ilaria Zambon, Maria Gras, Enrico Maria Mosconi, Alessandra Stefanoni, and Luca Salvati. 2018. "Clustering or Scattering? The Spatial Distribution of Cropland in a Metropolitan Region, 1960–2010" Sustainability 10, no. 7: 2584. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072584

APA Style

Colantoni, A., Zambon, I., Gras, M., Mosconi, E. M., Stefanoni, A., & Salvati, L. (2018). Clustering or Scattering? The Spatial Distribution of Cropland in a Metropolitan Region, 1960–2010. Sustainability, 10(7), 2584. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072584

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop