Next Article in Journal
New Carbon Emissions Allowance Allocation Method Based on Equilibrium Strategy for Carbon Emission Mitigation in the Coal-Fired Power Industry
Previous Article in Journal
The Small World of the Alternative Food Network
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Economical, Sustainable Pathway to Indole-Containing Oxindoles: Iron-Catalyzed 1,6-Conjugate Addition in Glycerol

1
Business School, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310015, China
2
Research Base of Philosophy and Social Science in Hangzhou, Center for Research of CSR and Sustainable Development, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310015, China
3
Faculty of Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(8), 2922; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082922
Submission received: 28 July 2018 / Revised: 9 August 2018 / Accepted: 10 August 2018 / Published: 17 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Chemical Engineering and Technology)

Abstract

:
The search for economical, sustainable and practical pathways in synthetic science would contribute to improving resource efficiency, developing a recycling economy and driving new-type urbanization. Green synthesis has established firm ground providing the right green yardstick for development of a sustainable approach to bioactive high-added value molecules and drug discovery, and further development of sustainable manufacturing processes in the pharmaceutical industry toward a green resource efficient economy. In this study, the combination of FeCl3 and glycerol exhibits a versatile and high catalytic activity in the atom economical 1,6-conjugated addition of para-quinone methides derived from isatins with indoles using the right green yardstick. The sustainable pathway provides the preparation of bioactive indole-containing oxindoles in excellent yields with superior advantages, such as the ready availability, low price and environmentally benign character of iron catalysis, easy product separation, cheap and safe bio-renewable glycerol as a green solvent, and catalytic system recycling under mild conditions.

1. Introduction

Resource efficiency is the maximising of the supply of funds, materials, staff, and other assets in order to function effectively in a sustainable manner, with minimum wasted resource expenses to minimise environmental impact [1]. In today’s environment, the demand for the production of high-quality products with minimum waste and energy demands is a very important challenge to the coordinated development of new urbanization and employment growth via the economic analysis of resource efficiency policies [2,3]. In the field of synthetic science, the concept of sustainability is clearly expressed by the use of low-waste organic transformations to achieve high incorporation of the starting materials into the final product, avoiding the formation of waste by-products, plus the use of catalysts to reduce energy needed [4,5,6]. Atom economy [7] has become one of 12 principles of green synthetic science [8]. Both green synthesis and resource efficiency are two key factors towards a green sustainable economy [9,10]. Thus, developing sustainable and practical pathways will be a long-term concerted and challenging task for scientists. In this regard, the 1,6-conjugated addition reaction catalyzed by Brønsted acids or Lewis acids for new chemical bond formation can provide a variety of bioactive compounds, and has complete atom economy [11]. Thus, the 1,6-conjugated addition reaction is attracting much research interest in academia [12,13,14].
The development of sustainability has led to the resurrection of iron catalysis in synthetic science. Currently, iron catalysis has been recognized as an environmentally friendly methodology in organic synthesis, due to its ready availability, low price and low toxicity, which is of great importance for many practical applications especially in the pharmaceutical industry, the food industry, and cosmetics. Thus, iron-catalyzed reactions have drawn much attention, which reflects an increasing demand for sustainable synthesis [15,16].
Developments in green reaction media with the ultimate goal of solving the environment problem are strongly needed [17]. In this regard, glycerol as a solvent derived from biomass is drawing increasing interest in the scientific community [18,19,20,21,22]. The bio-renewable glycerol is considered as “organic water”. Glycerol behaves like water, but it is better than water because of its high boiling point, lower vapor pressure and also dissolutions of most of the organic compound which are insoluble in water. Furthermore, it is abundant and inexpensive, non-toxic, highly polar, recyclable, biodegradable, immiscible with ether and hydrocarbons (this ability makes it possible remove the reaction products simply through liquid–liquid extraction), and compatible with most inorganic compounds (salts and transition metal complexes) [23].
3,3-Disubstituted oxindoles represent an important family of bioactive and pharmaceutical molecules, and their synthesis has drawn much attention [24,25,26]. In this paper, we report a highly efficient FeCl3 dissolved in glycerol catalyzed 1,6-conjugated addition reaction of para-quinone methides derived from isatins with indoles to afford bioactive indole-containing oxindoles in excellent yields. The superior advantages of the sustainable approach mainly include: (i) the environmentally benign character of iron catalysis; (ii) the first example of 1,6-conjugated addition reaction in glycerol; (iii) oxindoles containing an indolyl unit; (iv) complete atom economy, and easy product separation; (v) a recyclable catalytic system. The current sustainable iron catalysis meets the increasing demand of sustainability, such as energy resources, cheap catalysts, non-toxic reagents and green solvents.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Information

1H NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance), and 13C NMR spectra were measured at 400, 100 MHz spectrometer, respectively. The Supplementary Materials are NMR Spectra for all products. The shifts were reported relative to internal standard tetramethylsilane (TMS, 0 ppm) and referenced to solvent peaks in the NMR solvent (CDCl3 = δ 7.26 ppm; δ 77.16 ppm; d6-DMSO = δ 2.50 ppm; δ 39.52 ppm). Data are reported as: multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, m = multiplet), coupling constant in hertz (Hz) and signal area integration in natural numbers. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) spectra was obtained using EI ionization. Infrared spectra were recorded on an ATR-FTIR spectrometer. HRMS were obtained using EI or ESI ionization. All the reagents used were of analytical grade without further purification. Oxoindole-derived methide derivatives was obtained following the literature [12].

2.2. General Sustainable Procedure for Atom-Economical Synthesis of of 3,3-Disubstituted Oxindoles

As shown in Figure 1, para-Quinone methides derived from isatins 1 (2 mmol) and indoles 2 or pyrrole (2 mmol) were added to a solution of FeCl3 (0.2 mmol) in glycerol (4 mL), and the resulting mixture was stirred at 120 °C under an air atmosphere for 24 h (Table 1, entry 8). Complete consumption of starting materials was observed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC). After cooling, the reaction mixture was extracted with 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (an immiscible solvent, 2 × 4 mL), to separate the product, while the residue (glycerol layer), still containing the catalyst FeCl3 dissolved in the glycerol, was used as such for the recycling experiments. The collected organic phases were concentrated by distillation to recover 2-methyltetrahydrofuran and give the solid crude products 3 after washing with water (10 mL) and drying under a vacuum. The analytically pure products 3 could be obtained by flash silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 4:1 as the eluent). The yield obtained in each experiment is reported in Table 2.

2.3. General Procedure for Catalytic System Recycling

The recyclability of our catalytic system was investigated using the 1,6-conjugated addition reaction of para-quinone methide derived from isatin 1a and indole 2a as a model reaction. To the residue (the retained glycerol layer) obtained as described above, still containing the catalyst FeCl3 dissolved in glycerol, was added 1a (2 mmol) and 2a (2 mmol), and the resulting mixture was stirred at 120 °C under an air atmosphere for 24 h. Complete consumption of starting materials was observed by TLC. After cooling, the reaction mixture was extracted with 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2 × 4 mL), and the collected organic phases were concentrated and gave the crude products 3a after washing with water (10 mL) and drying under vacuum. The analytically pure product 3a was obtained after flash silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 4:1 as the eluent). To the retained glycerol layer, the substrates were again added, and the mixture was stirred under the same conditions described above to provide the desired product 3a after the same work up. This procedure was repeated up to five consecutive times. The yield obtained in each recycling experiment is reported in Table 3.

2.4. Characterization Data of Product 3 Is Listed Below

3-(3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3a) [27], 93% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.88 (s, 1H), 8.12 (s, 1H), 7.28 (s, 2H), 7.25–7.22 (m, 2H), 7.16 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.78 (s, 1H), 5.17 (s, 1H), 1.32 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 180.9, 153.0, 140.2, 136.9, 135.4, 134.9, 130.0, 127.89, 125.9, 125.8, 124.9, 124.6, 122.5, 122.0, 120.9, 119.5, 117.0, 111.3, 110.1, 57.7, 34.5, 30.3; infrared (IR) (film): γ = 3648, 3353, 2956, 2925, 1710, 1618, 1580, 1491, 1436, 1261, 826, 782 cm−1; HRMS (electron impact time of flight (EI-TOF)): calculated (calcd.) for C30H32N2O2 452.2464, found 452.2462.
3-(3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-4′-methyl-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3b), 91% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.73 (s, 1H), 8.08 (s, 1H), 7.20 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.04 (s, 1H), 6.97 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 6.87 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.49 (s, 1H), 5.19 (s, 1H), 1.94 (s, 3H), 1.32 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.0, 140.1, 138.0, 136.0, 127.9, 126.1, 124.8, 122.2, 122.1, 110.3, 109.1, 58.3, 34.5, 30.3, 20.4; IR (film): γ = 3637, 3342, 2956, 2925, 1706, 1618, 1322, 1021, 910, 747, 664 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C31H34N2O2 466.2620, found 466.2621.
3-(3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-5′-methyl-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3c), 93% yield, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.86 (s, 1H), 7.95 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (s, 2H), 7.15–7.07 (m, 2H), 7.05 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (dd, J = 11.0, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 6.84–6.80 (m, 2H), 6.68 (s, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 5.09 (s, 1H), 2.14 (s, 3H), 1.24 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 181.1, 153.0, 140.2, 135.3, 135.2, 135.1, 130.0, 128.5, 127.8, 126.1, 125.8, 125.0, 124.7, 123.6, 122.4, 120.4, 116.4, 110.9, 110.0, 57.7, 34.4, 30.3, 21.5; IR (film): γ = 3637, 2956, 2925, 1706, 1618, 1471, 1157, 910, 747, 695 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C31H34N2O2 466.2623, found 466.2621.
3-(3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-7′-methyl-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3d), 90% yield, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.90 (s, 1H), 8.03 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (s, 2H), 7.16 (ddd, J = 14.8, 13.7, 8.0 Hz, 3H), 6.96 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.92–6.87 (m, 2H), 6.76 (s, 1H), 6.73 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 5.16 (s, 1H), 2.22 (s, 3H), 1.32 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 181.1, 153.0, 140.1, 135.3, 135.2, 135.1, 130.0, 128.5, 127.8, 126.1, 125.8, 125.0, 124.7, 123.6, 122.4, 120.5, 116.4, 110.8, 110.0, 57.7, 34.4, 30.3, 21.5; IR (film): γ = 3537, 3241, 2956, 2925, 1706, 1618, 1471, 1236, 1157, 910, 747 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C31H34N2O2 466.2620, found 466.2621.
6′-Bromo-3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3e), 88% yield, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.69 (s, 1H), 8.24 (s, 1H), 7.38 (s, 1H), 7.21 (s, 2H), 7.19 (dd, J = 7.4, 3.2 Hz, 2H), 7.02–6.96 (m, 2H), 6.89 (dd, J = 8.1, 5.1 Hz, 2H), 6.74 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.18 (s, 1H), 1.31 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.1, 139.9, 137.7, 135.5, 134.6, 129.7, 128.0, 125.6, 125.0, 124.8, 124.7, 122.7, 122.6, 122.3, 117.2, 115.7, 114.1, 110.1, 57.5, 34.4, 30.2; IR (film): γ = 3537, 3441, 2956, 2925, 1706, 1618, 1471, 1322, 1157, 910, 750 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C30H31BrN2O2 530.1569, found 530.1570.
7′-Chloro-3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3f), 89% yield, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.04 (s, 1H), 8.32 (s, 1H), 7.26 (s, 2H), 7.19 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.10 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (dd, J = 14.3, 6.9 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (dd, J = 6.8, 4.2 Hz, 3H), 6.83 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 5.19 (s, 1H), 1.32 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 180.6, 153.1, 140.2, 135.5, 134.5, 134.1, 129.7, 128.0, 127.3, 125.7, 125.1, 124.8, 122.5, 121.5, 120.3, 119.7, 118.4, 116.5, 110.2, 57.6, 34.4, 30.2; IR (film): γ = 3437, 3241, 3056, 2925, 1706, 1618, 1471, 1256, 1157, 910 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C30H31ClN2O2 486.2074, found 486.2075.
3-(3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-5′-methoxy-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3g), 92% yield, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.38 (s, 1H), 8.02 (s, 1H), 7.29 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 7.26 (s, 1H), 7.21 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.36 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.17 (s, 1H), 3.53 (s, 3H), 1.33 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 180.3, 153.5, 152.9, 140.0, 135.4, 134.8, 131.9, 130.0, 127.9, 126.4, 125.9, 124.9, 122.5, 116.9, 112.3, 111.8, 109.8, 102.5, 57.5, 55.4, 34.4, 30.2; IR (film): γ = 3337, 3141, 2956, 2870, 1706, 1618, 1471, 1206, 1157, 910, 750, 624 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C31H34N2O3 482.2569, found 482.2570.
3-(3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-7′-methoxy-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3h), 90% yield, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.18 (s, 1H), 8.59–8.20 (m, 1H), 7.29 (s, 1H), 7.22 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.54 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 5.16 (s, 1H), 3.88 (s, 1H), 1.32 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 181.1, 153.0, 145.9, 140.3, 135.3, 135.1, 135.0, 130.1, 127.8, 127.4, 127.2, 125.8, 125.0, 124.1, 122.4, 119.8, 117.6, 113.7, 110.1, 101.9, 57.7, 55.2, 34.5, 30.3; IR (film): γ = 3537, 3241, 3056, 2925, 2870, 1706, 1618, 1236, 1157, 910, 747, 650 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C31H34N2O3 482.2569, found 482.2568.
3-(3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-methyl-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3i), 89% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.94 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 10.48 (s, 1H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (s, 2H), 7.04–6.97 (m, 2H), 6.92 (dd, J = 11.4, 6.3 Hz, 3H), 6.86 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 2.19 (s, 3H), 1.28 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 179.1, 152.6, 138.8, 138.3, 136.7, 134.7, 131.0, 130.1, 128.0, 125.8, 125.6, 124.7, 124.1, 120.9, 120.2, 118.2, 115.9, 111.5, 109.3, 56.9, 34.5, 30.2, 20.7; IR (film): γ = 3423, 2968, 2254, 1657, 1487, 1435, 1386, 825, 763, 630 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C31H34N2O2 466.2620, found 466.2619.
3-(3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-4′,5-dimethyl-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3j), 87% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.65 (s, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (s, 1H), 6.97 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.92 (s, 1H), 6.76 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.46 (s, 1H), 2.24 (s, 3H), 1.97 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 3H), 1.34 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.0, 138.0, 137.5, 136.0, 131.5, 128.2, 126.9, 124.9, 122.2, 122.1, 109.8, 109.1, 34.6, 30.2, 21.1; IR (film): γ = 3403, 2956, 2925, 1699, 1622, 1464, 1238, 1076, 1016 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C32H36N2O2 480.2777, found 480.2776.
3-(3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-5,5′-dimethyl-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3k), 91% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.81 (s, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (s, 2H), 7.02 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 2H), 6.96 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.72 (dd, J = 5.9, 1.8 Hz, 2H), 5.15 (s, 1H), 2.35 (s, 3H), 2.21 (s, 3H), 1.33 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 181.0, 152.9, 137.7, 137.3, 135.2, 135.0, 131.7, 131.6, 130.2, 128.1, 126.5, 125.0, 124.0, 123.8, 121.2, 120.5, 117.0, 111.1, 109.7, 57.8, 34.5, 30.3, 21.6, 21.2; IR (film): γ = 3627, 3403, 2956, 1701, 1624, 1492, 1390, 1322, 1160, 1096, 1051, 881 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C32H36N2O2 480.2777, found 480.2775.
6′-Bromo-3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-methyl-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3l), 85% yield, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.49 (s, 1H), 8.21 (s, 1H), 7.39 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (s, 2H), 7.03–6.96 (m, 3H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 5.17 (s, 1H), 2.24 (s, 3H), 1.32 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 180.5, 153.0, 137.7, 137.5, 135.4, 134.6, 132.0, 129.9, 128.4, 126.3, 125.1, 124.8, 124.7, 122.7, 122.4, 117.3, 115.6, 114.1, 109.7, 57.6, 34.4, 30.2, 21.2; IR (film): γ = 3437, 3141, 2956, 2925, 1706, 1618, 1471, 1322, 1157, 1021, 910, 747, 644 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C31H34BrN2O2 545.1804, found 545.1805.
7′-Chloro-3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-methyl-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3m), 87% yield, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.61 (s, 1H), 8.28 (s, 1H), 7.27 (s, 2H), 7.11 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 6.95 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.88–6.79 (m, 1H), 5.18 (s, 1H), 2.25 (s, 3H), 1.33 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 180.3, 153.0, 137.6, 135.4, 134.5, 134.1, 131.9, 129.8, 128.4, 127.4, 126.4, 125.1, 124.9, 121.4, 120.3, 119.8, 118.6, 116.4, 109.7, 57.6, 34.4, 30.2, 21.2. IR (film): γ = 3137, 3041, 2956, 2870, 1706, 1618, 1378, 1322, 1157, 910, 744, 603 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C31H34ClN2O2 501.2309, found 501.2308.
4′-Bromo-3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-methyl-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3n), 88% yield, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.57 (s, 1H), 8.40 (s, 1H), 7.92 (s, 1H), 7.17–7.05 (m, 2H), 7.02 (s, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 6.70 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.35 (s, 1H), 5.21 (s, 1H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 1.34 (d, J = 33.0 Hz, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 183.7, 153.1, 138.9, 138.5, 135.9, 135.3, 134.9, 131.0, 130.0, 128.1, 126.4, 125.9, 124.9, 124.7, 122.8, 113.8, 110.7, 110.0, 57.7, 34.6, 30.4, 30.1, 21.2; IR (film): γ = 3537, 3241, 3024, 2956, 2870, 1706, 1471, 1322, 1157, 1021, 910, 747, 644 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C31H34BrN2O2 545.1804, found 545.1805.
5-Chloro-3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-4′-methyl-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3o), 90% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.62 (s, 1H), 8.28 (s, 1H), 7.27 (s, 2H), 7.11 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 6.96 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.89–6.79 (m, 1H), 5.18 (s, 1H), 2.25 (s, 3H), 1.33 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 180.3, 153.0, 137.6, 135.4, 134.5, 134.1, 131.9, 129.8, 128.43, 127.4, 126.4, 125.1, 124.8, 121.4, 120.3, 119.8, 118.6, 116.4, 109.7, 57.6, 34.4, 30.2, 21.2; IR (film): γ = 3403, 2955, 2924, 2254, 1714, 1613, 1472, 1435, 1160, 1007, 763, 630 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C31H34ClN2O2 501.2309, found 501.2308.
6′-Bromo-5-chloro-3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3p), 93% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 11.17 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 10.79 (s, 1H), 7.58 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (dd, J = 8.3, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (s, 2H), 7.03–6.99 (m, 3H), 6.94–6.86 (m, 2H), 1.28 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 178.6, 152.9, 140.1, 138.7, 137.7, 136.4, 130.1, 127.9, 125.9, 125.5, 124.9, 124.4, 123.8, 121.9, 121.3, 115.1, 114.3, 113.9, 111.3, 57.1, 34.5, 30.2; IR (film): γ = 3628, 3345, 2957, 2925, 1711, 1615, 1436, 1375, 1079, 1021, 1007, 808 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C30H30 BrClN2O2 564.1179, found 564.1179.
5-Bromo-3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3q), 87% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 11.02 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 10.77 (s, 1H), 7.43 (dd, J = 8.3, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (s, 2H), 7.08–7.02 (m, 2H), 6.96 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.86–6.79 (m, 2H), 1.28 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 178.7, 152.9, 140.6, 138.6, 137.0, 136.8, 130.6, 130.1, 127.7, 125.3, 24.8, 123.9, 121.1, 119.8, 118.4, 115.0, 113.1, 111.7, 57.1, 34.6, 30.2; IR (film): γ = 3404, 2983, 2356, 1677, 1472, 1359, 1251, 905, 826, 764 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C30H31 BrN2O3 530.1569, found 530.1572.
5-Bromo-3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-4′-methyl-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3r), 88% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.99 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 10.68 (s, 1H), 7.44 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 2H), 6.95 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 3H), 6.63 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.45 (s, 1H), 1.86 (s, 3H), 1.31 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 152.9, 140.4, 138.5, 137.9, 130.6, 127.9, 124.4, 121.3, 121.1, 112.9, 111.9, 109.6, 57.9, 34.6, 30.2; IR (film): γ = 3421, 2924, 2256, 1655, 1472, 1379, 1051, 1005, 826, 764 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C31H33 BrN2O2 544.1725, found 544.1721.
3-(3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-1-methyl-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3s), 92% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.07 (s, 1H), 7.29 (q, J = 7.9 Hz, 3H), 7.25 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.22–7.16 (m, 1H), 7.15–7.05 (m, 1H), 7.02 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (dd, J = 7.6, 4.2 Hz, 2H), 6.91–6.84 (m, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 5.14 (s, 1H), 3.32 (s, 3H), 1.32 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 178.2, 152.9, 143.0, 136.9, 135.2, 134.2, 130.1, 127.9, 125.9, 125.6, 124.9, 124.3, 124.1, 122.5, 121.9, 120.8, 120.7, 119.8, 119.4, 117.5, 111.1, 108.1, 102.5, 57.1, 34.5, 30.2, 26.6; IR (film): γ = 3637, 3301, 2956, 2925, 1706, 1471, 1436, 1237, 1143, 909, 803, 750, 668 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C31H34N2O2 466.2620, found 466.2617.
3-(3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-1-methyl-3,3′-biindolin-2-one (3t), 94% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.07 (s, 1H), 7.29 (q, J = 7.9 Hz, 3H), 7.25 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.22–7.16 (m, 1H), 7.15–7.05 (m, 1H), 7.02 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (dd, J = 7.6, 4.2 Hz, 2H), 6.91–6.84 (m, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 5.14 (s, 1H), 3.32 (s, 3H), 1.32 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 178.2, 152.9, 143.0, 136.9, 135.2, 134.2, 130.1, 127.9, 125.9, 125.6, 124.9, 124.3, 124.1, 122.5, 121.9, 120.8, 120.7, 119.7, 119.4, 117.5, 111.1, 108.1, 102.5, 57.1, 34.4, 30.2, 26.6; IR (film): γ = 3637, 3301, 2956, 1706, 1619, 1471, 1321, 1237, 1143, 909, 803, 750 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C31H34N2O2 466.2620, found 466.2617.
3-(3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-3-(1H-pyrrol-2-yl)indolin-2-one (3u), 94% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.57 (s, 2H), 7.39 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (td, J = 7.7, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (td, J = 7.6, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.95–6.89 (m, 2H), 6.83 (s, 2H), 6.68 (dd, J = 4.3, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 5.91 (dd, J = 5.6, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 5.82 (dd, J = 4.5, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 1.26 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 177.9, 152.8, 141.2, 138.5, 133.7, 132.1, 129.3, 127.8, 125.3, 123.6, 121.6, 118.9, 109.5, 107.3, 106.2, 57.3, 34.4, 30.1; IR (film): γ = 3637, 3201, 2956, 1706, 1645, 1540, 1436, 955, 803, 750, 608 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C26H30 N2O2 402.2707, found 402.2701.
3-(3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-methyl-3-(1H-pyrrol-2-yl)indolin-2-one (3v), 95% yield, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.00 (s, 1H), 8.71 (dd, J = 28.4, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (s, 1H), 7.01 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (s, 2H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.13 (dd, J = 5.2, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.05 (t, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 5.15 (s, 1H), 2.31 (s, 3H), 1.33 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 180.4, 180.4, 153.0, 135.7, 134.0, 132.3, 132.1, 128.4, 126.3, 123.9, 118.6, 109.9, 108.6, 107.7, 57.8, 34.3, 30.2, 21.3. IR (film): γ = 3337, 3141, 3025, 2956, 2870, 1706, 1618, 1471, 1378, 1322, 910, 750, 644 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C27H32N2O2 416.2464, found 416.2464.
3-(3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-methoxy-3-(1H-pyrrol-2-yl)indolin-2-one (3w), 97% yield, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.02 (s, 1H), 8.62 (s, 1H), 6.89 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (s, 2H), 6.84 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (dd, J = 3.9, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.14 (dd, J = 5.9, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 6.08 (t, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 5.14 (s, 1H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 1.32 (s, 18H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 180.2, 155.9, 153.1, 135.7, 135.3, 133.3, 131.9, 128.2, 123.8, 118.7, 112.9, 112.5, 110.5, 108.6, 107.8, 58.1, 55.8, 34.3, 30.2; IR (film): γ = 3037, 3141, 2956, 2925, 2770, 1706, 1618, 1471, 1436, 1378, 1322, 1236, 1157, 1021, 850, 747, 624 cm−1; HRMS (EI-TOF): calcd. for C27H32N2O3 432.2413, found 432.2414.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Sustainable Methodology

To start this work, firstly we investigated the model 1,6-conjugate addition reaction between para-quinone methide derived from isatin (1a) and indole (2a) in glycerol, and screened the reaction conditions. The procedure of the reaction was monitored by TLC and the results are summarized in Table 1. It is noted that 2-methyltetrahydrofuran as a biomass-derived solvent, is an immiscible solvent with glycerol. The desired product 3a can be extracted with 2-methyltetrahydrofuran from the reaction mixture in glycerol at room temperature, because 3a is insoluble in high viscous glycerol at room temperature although it is soluble in low viscous glycerol at high temperature (>100 °C). To optimize the reaction conditions, firstly, we investigated the catalytic effect of diphenyl phosphoric acid on reaction at different temperatures for 24 h, and noted that there was no reaction at 25 °C because of the insolubility of substrate (1a) in high viscous glycerol (Table 1, entry 1). When we increased the reaction temperature from 25 to 60 °C to make the solvent low viscous and improved the solubility of substrate (1a), a rare amount of desired product (3a) was observed on TLC (Table 1, entry 2). A continuous increase of temperature to 80 °C and 120 °C increased the yield of the required product to rare, 60% and 86% respectively (Table 1, entries 3 and 4). When we set the temperature of reaction according to the yield, then we screened the different type of catalyst to identify the best reaction protocol. After further screening the different catalysts like H3PO4, PhCO2H, FeCl3, we found that FeCl3 could be easily dissolved in glycerol and became the best choice of catalysts according to the yield (Table 1, entries 5–7). After the loading of FeCl3 catalyst was investigated, we found that 10 mol% is the best loading of catalyst to give the desired indole-containing oxindole 3a in 93% yield (Table 1, entries 7–9). For comparison, we have studied the catalytic activity of FeCl3 in different conventional volatile organic solvents, such as toluene, xylene and 1,2-dichloroethane under reflux, finding that the efficiency of the 1,6-conjugate addition reaction was remarkably lowered (Table 1, entries 10–12). Thus, the optimized reaction conditions were identified (Table 1, entry 8).
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, our next step was to investigate the scope of substrate with a different type and at different position of substitutions. To our delight, FeCl3 dissolved in glycerol showed near-perfect performance for such an organic transformation and the results are summarized in Table 2. Firstly, we observed that a wide range of indoles with electron-withdrawing or electron-donating groups are suitable nucleophiles to afford the corresponding products with high yields (88–93%, Table 2, entries 1–8). Meanwhile, we also examined the effect of substitution on para-quinone methides derived from isatins, and no obvious electron effect was observed. Various electron-withdrawing or electron-donating groups, such as Me, Cl and Br, could also be successfully employed in the 1,6-conjugate addition reaction to reveal excellent results (85–93%, Table 2, entries 9–18). It is noteworthy that the effect of protecting the group on the reaction protocol was also examined to show that there was no significant effect on the yield of required products when indole or para-quinone methide derived from isatin was protected with N-methylation consecutively (Table 2, entries 19–20).
Furthermore, we then expanded the generality of the FeCl3 dissolved in glycerol catalyzed 1,6-conjugate addition reaction by using new nucleophile pyrrole, and the results obtained are shown in Scheme 1. The different para-quinone methides derived from isatins could react with pyrrole to afford the corresponding product pyrrole-containing oxindoles in excellent yields (94–97%) under the above standard conditions.

3.2. Catalytic System Recycling

The good results prompted us to study the recyclability of the catalytic system in a batch. We developed FeCl3 dissolved in glycerol as a the catalytic system recycling for 1,6-conjugate addition reaction of oxoindole-derived methides and indoles for the construction of 3,3-disubstituted oxindoles. The separation of the products was realized by a simple extraction with 2-methyltetrahydrofuran, which is an immiscible solvent with glycerol, while the retained glycerol layer still contained the catalyst FeCl3. The catalytic system with FeCl3 dissolved in glycerol has some obvious advantages, such as, long life time and high level of reusability. When the reaction between 1a and 2a was completed under the standard reaction conditions, the final product 3a was extracted using 2-methyltetrahydrofuran, and the retained glycerol phase with FeCl3 was reused by just adding the substrates again under the same reaction protocol. As shown in Table 3, we observed that this procedure could be repeated up to 5 times with no loss of catalytic activity, and the desired product 3a was obtained in excellent yield every time, which bears witness to the catalyst’s robustness.

4. Conclusions

A highly efficient and atom-economical synthesis of bioactive indole-containing oxindoles was developed by using a FeCl3 dissolved in glycerol catalyzed 1,6-conjugated addition reaction of para-quinone methides derived from isatins and indoles. Pyrrole was also applicable to afford the corresponding pyrrole-containing oxindoles in excellent yields with this protocol. The desired 3,3-disubstituted oxoindoles could be extracted using the biomass-derived solvent 2-methyltetrahydrofuran and the retained glycerol layer with FeCl3 could be reused up to 5 times with very high efficiency. The superior advantages of the sustainable methodology include the ready availability, low price and environmentally benign character of iron catalysis, easy product separation, and a recyclable catalyst system. The current iron catalysis meets the increasing demand of sustainability, such as energy resources, cheap catalysts, non-toxic reagents and green solvents.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2922/s1, NMR spectra for all products.

Author Contributions

L.T. conceived and directed the project, and analyzed the data; A.R. performed the experiments and the characterizations. Both authors co-wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Social Science Planning Project of Zhejiang Province grant number 16ZJQN052YB.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Zhejiang Social Science Planning Zhi Jiang Youth Project. Financial support from the Social Science Planning Project of Zhejiang Province (Project No. 16ZJQN052YB) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Xu. Lin for assistance with designing the research and analyzing the data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tukker, A.; Giljum, S.; Wood, R. Recent progress in assessment of resource efficiency and environmental impacts embodied in trade: An introduction to this special issue. J. Ind. Ecol. 2018, 22, 489–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vanner, R.; Bicket, M. The role of paradigm analysis in the development of policies for a resource efficient economy. Sustainability 2016, 8, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bicket, M.; Vanner, R. Designing policy mixes for resource efficiency: The role of public acceptability. Sustainability 2016, 8, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Augé, J.; Scherrmann, M.-C. Determination of the global material economy (GME) of synthesis sequences—A green chemistry metric to evaluate the greenness of products. New J. Chem. 2012, 36, 1091–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dunn, P.J. The importance of green chemistry in process research and development. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1452–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Laird, T. Green chemistry is good process chemistry. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2012, 16, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Trost, B.M. The atom economy—A search for synthetic efficiency. Science 1991, 254, 1471–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Tang, S.L.Y.; Smith, R.L.; Poliakoff, M. Principles of green chemistry: Productively. Green Chem. 2005, 7, 761–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wilhelm, R. Sustainable economy—Key factors for sustainable transformations. GAIA Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 2015, 24, 199–200. [Google Scholar]
  10. Anderson, K. The sustainable economy. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2011, 89, 52–62. [Google Scholar]
  11. Silva, E.M.P.; Silva, A.M.S. 1,6-Conjugate addition of nucleophiles to alpha, beta, gamma, delta-diunsaturated systems. Synthesis 2012, 44, 3109–3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Meng, F.; Li, X.; Torker, S.; Shi, Y.; Shen, X.; Hoveyda, A.H. Catalytic enantioselective 1,6-conjugate additions of propargyl and allyl groups. Nature 2016, 537, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Chu, W.-D.; Zhang, L.-F.; Bao, X.; Zhao, X.-H.; Zeng, C.; Du, J.-Y.; Zhang, G.-B.; Wang, F.-X.; Ma, X.-Y.; Fan, C.-A. Asymmetric catalytic 1,6-conjugate addition/aromatization of para-quinone methides: Enantioselective introduction of functionalized diarylmethine stereogenic centers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 9229–9233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, H.; Wang, K.; Man, Y.; Gao, X.; Yang, L.; Ren, Y.; Li, N.; Tang, B.; Zhao, G. Asymmetric intermolecular Rauhut-Currier reaction for the construction of 3,3-disubstituted oxindoles with quaternary stereogenic centers. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 3934–3939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bauer, I.; Knӧlker, H.-J. Iron catalysis in organic synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 3170–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bisz, E.; Szostak, M. Iron-catalyzed C-O bond activation: Opportunity for sustainable catalysis. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 3964–3981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Anastas, P.T.; Warner, J.C. Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gu, Y.; Barrault, J.; Jérôme, F. Glycerol as an efficient promoting medium for organic reactions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 2007–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gu, Y.; Jérôme, F. Glycerol as a sustainable solvent for green chemistry. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 1127–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wolfson, A.; Dlugy, C.; Shotland, Y. Glycerol as a green solvent for high product yields and selectivities. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2007, 5, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tagliapietra, S.; Orio, L.; Palmisano, G.; Penoni, A.; Gravotto, G. Catalysis in glycerol: A survey of recent advances. Chem. Pap. 2015, 69, 1519–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tan, L.; Rahman, A. From technical efficiency to economic efficiency: Development of Aza-Friedel–Crafts reaction using phosphoric acid immobilized in glycerol as a sustainable approach. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vidal, C.; García-Álvarez, J. Glycerol: A biorenewable solvent for base-free Cu(I)-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of azides with terminal and 1-iodoalkynes. Highly efficient transformations and catalyst recycling. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 3515–3521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Riggio, O.; Mannaioni, G.; Ridola, L.; Angeloni, S.; Merli, M.; Carlà, V.; Salvatori, F.M.; Moroni, F. Peripheral and splanchnic indole and oxindole levels in cirrhotic patients: A study on the pathophysiology of hepatic encephalopathy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 105, 1374–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Greig, N.H.; Pei, X.-F.; Soncrant, T.T.; Ingram, D.K.; Brossi, A. Phenserine and ring C hetero-analogues: Drug candidates for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Med. Res. Rev. 1995, 15, 3–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dalpozzo, R. Catalytic asymmetric synthesis of hetero-substituted oxindoles. Org. Chem. Front. 2017, 4, 2063–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rahman, A.; Zhou, Q.; Lin, X. Asymmetric organocatalytic synthesis of chiral 3,3-disubstituted oxindoles via 1,6-conjugate addition reaction. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16, 5301–5309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Synthesis of of 3,3-Disubstituted Oxindoles.
Figure 1. Synthesis of of 3,3-Disubstituted Oxindoles.
Sustainability 10 02922 g001
Scheme 1. 1,6-Conjugate addition reaction with pyrrole.
Scheme 1. 1,6-Conjugate addition reaction with pyrrole.
Sustainability 10 02922 sch001
Table 1. Optimized reaction conditions a.
Table 1. Optimized reaction conditions a.
Sustainability 10 02922 i001
EntryCatalystxTemperature [°C]Isolated Yield [%]
1(PhO)2PO2H1525no reaction
2(PhO)2PO2H1560trace
3(PhO)2PO2H158060
4(PhO)2PO2H1512086
5H3PO4 (85%)15120trace
6PhCO2H1512085
7FeCl31512093
8FeCl31012093
9FeCl3512080
10 bFeCl31011045
11 cFeCl31012050
12 dFeCl3108076
a Reactions were performed with 1 (2 mmol), 2 (2 mmol) and catalyst in glycerol (4 mL) for 24 h; b With toluene (4 mL) as the solvent; c With xylene (4 mL) as the solvent; d With ClCH2CH2Cl (4 mL) as the solvent.
Table 2. Sustainable approach for synthesis of indole-containing oxindoles a.
Table 2. Sustainable approach for synthesis of indole-containing oxindoles a.
Sustainability 10 02922 i002
Entry1R1R22R3R4Product (3)Isolated Yield [%]
11aHH2aHH3a93
21aHH2b4-MeH3b91
31aHH2c5-MeH3c93
41aHH2d7-MeH3d90
51aHH2e6-BrH3e88
61aHH2f7-ClH3f89
71aHH2g5-OMeH3g92
81aHH2h7-OMeH3h90
91bMeH2bHH3i89
101bMeH2b4-MeH3j87
111bMeH2d7-MeH3k91
121bMeH2e6-BrH3l85
131bMeH2f7-ClH3m87
141bMeH2i4-BrH3n88
151cClH2b4-MeH3o90
161cClH2e6-BrH3p93
171dBrH2aHH3q87
181dBrH2b4-MeH3r88
191eHMe2aHH3s92
201fHH2jHMe3t94
a Reactions were performed with 1 (2 mmol), 2 (2 mmol) and FeCl3 (0.2 mmol) in glycerol (4 mL) at 120 °C for 24 h.
Table 3. Study of catalytic system recycling a.
Table 3. Study of catalytic system recycling a.
Sustainability 10 02922 i003
RunCrude Yield (%)Isolated Yield (%)
19793
29995
39894
49893
59994
a Reactions were performed using FeCl3 (0.2 mmol) in glycerol (4 mL) at 120 °C for 24 h, and 2 mmol of 1a and 2a was always employed.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tan, L.; Rahman, A. An Economical, Sustainable Pathway to Indole-Containing Oxindoles: Iron-Catalyzed 1,6-Conjugate Addition in Glycerol. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082922

AMA Style

Tan L, Rahman A. An Economical, Sustainable Pathway to Indole-Containing Oxindoles: Iron-Catalyzed 1,6-Conjugate Addition in Glycerol. Sustainability. 2018; 10(8):2922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082922

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tan, Lan, and Abdul Rahman. 2018. "An Economical, Sustainable Pathway to Indole-Containing Oxindoles: Iron-Catalyzed 1,6-Conjugate Addition in Glycerol" Sustainability 10, no. 8: 2922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082922

APA Style

Tan, L., & Rahman, A. (2018). An Economical, Sustainable Pathway to Indole-Containing Oxindoles: Iron-Catalyzed 1,6-Conjugate Addition in Glycerol. Sustainability, 10(8), 2922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082922

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop