Erratum: Urso, G., et al. Resilience and Sectoral Composition Change of Italian Inner Areas in Response to the Great Recession. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2679

The authors would like to make the following corrections to the published paper [1]. The changes are as follows:

(1) Replacing the descriptions:

Figure 2, presented above, can help us distinguish areas as pro-trend vs anti-trend in this way:

• If a municipality grows more than the nation in growing sectors at the national level (Area $E{C}_i^{+}$), and declines in declining sectors at the national level (Area $E{C}_i^{-}$’) then it is “pro-trend”.
• Oppositely, if most of the excess of change lines are in the Areas $E{C}_i^{+}$’ and $E{C}_i^{-}$, municipalities are defined as “anti-trend”.

with

Figure 2, presented above, can help us distinguish areas as pro-trend vs anti-trend in this way:

-

If a municipality grows more than the nation in growing sectors at the national level (Area $E{C}_i^{+}$), and declines in declining sectors at the national level (Area $E{C}_i^{-}$’) then it is “pro-trend”.

-

Oppositely, if most of the excess of change lines are in the Areas $E{C}_i^{+}$’ and $E{C}_i^{-}$, municipalities are defined as “anti-trend”.

The authors and the Editorial Office would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes. The changes do not affect the scientific results. The manuscript will be updated and the original will remain online on the article webpage.