The Threats of North Korea’s Missile and Visitors’ International Conference Choice Behavior
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Conceptual Background
2.1. Value-Based Adoption Model
2.2. International Conference: Motivations and Participations
3. Hypotheses Development
3.1. Benefits
3.1.1. Technological Support
3.1.2. Program Usefulness
3.1.3. Destination Enjoyment
3.2. Sacrifices
3.2.1. Perceived Cost
3.2.2. Perceived Threat
3.3. Perceived Value and Revisit Intention
3.4. Exposure to North Korean News
4. Methodology
4.1. Participants
4.2. Measures
4.3. Analytical Method
5. Data Analysis and Results
5.1. Data Cleaning and Sample Profile
5.2. Nonresponse Bias
5.3. Reliability and Validity of Instruments
5.4. Common Method Bias
5.5. Hypothesis Testing
6. Discussion and Implications
6.1. Discussions
6.2. Implications and Limitations
7. Conclusions
- This study classifies the motivations and constraints in the concept of benefit and sacrifice, including the perceived value of conference participation as the participant’s overall perception of the conference based on the evaluation of the benefits and sacrifices of attending.
- The target participants of this study are of non-Korean origin, as we aim to figure out the perceptions toward South Korea as a destination under the limited information given via media and subjective interpretation through visiting experience.
- The findings indicate that technological support, program usefulness, and perceived threats are predictors of perceived value while destination enjoyment and perceived cost have no significant effect on perceived value.
- However, perceived value is influenced by media exposure of North Korea missile threats and the perceived value has significant influence on revisit intention.
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Rittichainuwat, B.N.; Beck, J.A.; Lalopa, J. Understanding motivations, inhibitors, and facilitators of association members in attending international conferences. J. Conv. Exhibit. Manag. 2001, 3, 45–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwag, D.H.; Lee, B.C. Research trend analysis of event and convention research by network analysis. Event Conv. Res. 2019, 33, 47–65. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, H.W.; Chan, H.C.; Gupta, S. Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation. Decis. Support. Syst. 2007, 43, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eggert, A.; Ulaga, W. Customer perceived value: a substitute for satisfaction in business markets? J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2002, 17, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, W.; Malek, K. Understanding the relationship among motivation to attend, satisfaction, and loyalty of medical convention attendees. J. Conv. Event Tour. 2017, 18, 282–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prebensen, N.K.; Woo, E.; Chen, J.S.; Uysal, M. Motivation and involvement as antecedents of the perceived value of the destination experience. J. Travel Res. 2012, 52, 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Tourism Organization. AM Reports, Volume seven—Global Report on the Meetings Industry; UNWTO: Madrid, Spain, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, S.S.; Chon, K.; Chung, K.Y. Convention industry in South Korea: an economic impact analysis. Tour. Manag. 2003, 24, 533–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oppermann, M.; Chon, K.S. Convention participation decision making process. Ann. Tour. Res. 1997, 24, 78–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allameh, S.M.; Khazaei Pool, J.; Jaberi, A.; Salehzadeh, R.; Asadi, H. Factors influencing sport tourists’ revisit intentions: The role and effect of destination image, perceived quality, perceived value and satisfaction. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2015, 27, 191–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buhalis, D.; Amaranggana, A. Smart tourism destinations enhancing tourism experience through personalisation of services. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2015; pp. 3773–3789. [Google Scholar]
- Ngamsom, B.; Beck, J. A pilot study of motivations, inhibitors, and facilitators of association members in attending international conferences. J. Conv. Exhibit. Manag. 2000, 2, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanford, S.; Montgomery, R.; Nelson, K.B. Factors that influence attendance, satisfaction, and loyalty for conventions. J. Conv. Event Tour. 2012, 13, 290–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsuo, T.; Iwamoto, H. Analysis of motivation of convention participants and proposal of attendance management system. In Proceedings of the 2017 18th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD), Kanazawa, Japan, 26–28 June 2017; pp. 6216–6226. [Google Scholar]
- Dragin-Jensen, C.; Schnittka, O.; Feddersen, A.; Kottemann, P.; Rezvani, Z. They come from near and far: The impact of spatial distance to event location on event attendance motivations. Scand. J. Hosp. Tour. 2018, 18, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teas, R.K.; Agarwal, S. The effects of extrinsic product cues on consumers’ perceptions of quality, sacrifice, and value. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2000, 28, 278–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, T.C.; Wu, S.; Hsu, J.S.C.; Chou, Y.C. The integration of value-based adoption and expectation–confirmation models: An example of IPTV continuance intention. Decis. Support. Syst. 2012, 54, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Park, S.; Sun, M.R.; Lee, J.H. A study of smart beacon-based meeting, incentive trip, convention, exhibition and event (MICE) services using big data. Proced. Comput. Sci. 2016, 91, 761–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, S.; Lehto, X.Y.; Park, J. Travelers’ intent to use mobile technologies as a function of effort and performance expectancy. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2009, 18, 765–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.; Park, A.; Chung, N.; Lee, K.J. A near field communication adoption and its impact on Expo visitors’ behavior. Int. J. Info. Manag. 2016, 36, 1328–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S. To tweet or not to tweet: An exploratory study of meeting professionals’ attitudes toward applying social media for meeting sessions. J. Conv. Event Tour. 2011, 12, 271–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, N.; Kim, H.; Lee, P. The relationship between NFC quality, satisfaction and behavioral intention in exhibition industry: Moderating effect of gender and perceived crowding. Int. J. Tour. Manag. Sci. 2018, 33, 215–238. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S.S.; Lee, C.H. An exploratory study of convention specific social media usage by attendees: Motivations and effect of generations on choice of convention information source and intention to use mobile application. J. Conv. Event Tour. 2014, 15, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva-Pedroza, D.; Marin-Calero, R.; Ramirez-Gonzalez, G. NFC Evaluation in the Development of Mobile Applications for MICE in Tourism. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.C. Examining the level of sophistication and success of destination marketing systems: impacts of organizational factors. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2008, 24, 81–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baloglu, S.; Love, C. Association meeting planners’ perceptions and intentions for five major US convention cities: the structured and unstructured images. Tour. Manag. 2004, 26, 743–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Comas, M.; Moscardo, G. Understanding and their conference decision-making progresses. J. Conv. Event Tour. 2005, 7, 117–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, C.D.; Goo, J.; Nam, K.; Yoo, C.W. Smart tourism technologies in travel planning: The role of exploration and exploitation. Info. Manag. 2017, 54, 757–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davidson, R.; Alford, P.; Seaton, T. The use of information and communications technology by the European meetings, incentives, conferences, and exhibitions (MICE) sectors. J. Conv. Exhibit. Manag. 2002, 4, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lau, C.K.; Milne, S.; Johnston, C.S. MICE, ICT and local economic development: The case of Te Kahurangi, New Zealand. J. Conv. Event Tour. 2005, 7, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mistilis, N.; Dwyer, L. Information technology and service standards in MICE tourism. J. Conv. Exhibit. Manag. 2000, 2, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Park, S.; Fesenmaier, D.R. The role of smartphones in mediating the touristic experience. J. Travel Res. 2012, 51, 371–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Garrison, G. Investigating mobile wireless technology adoption: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Info. Syst. Front. 2009, 11, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lagerkvist, A. Travels in third space: Experiential suspense in media space: The case of America (Un) known. Euro. J. Commun. 2008, 23, 343–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Severt, D.; Wang, Y.; Chen, P.J.; Breiter, D. Examining the motivation, perceived performance, and behavioral intentions of convention attendees: Evidence from a regional conference. Tour. Manag. 2007, 28, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mair, J.; Thompson, K. The UK association conference attendance decision-making process. Tour. Manag. 2009, 30, 400–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jago, L.K.; Deery, M. Relationships and factors influencing convention decision-making. J. Conv. Event Tour. 2005, 7, 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonmez, S.F.; Graefe, A.R. Determining future travel behavior from past travel experience and perception of risk and safety. J. Travel Res. 1998, 37, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fjelstul, J.; Severt, K.; Breiter, D. Building association attendance: Differences between chapter, regional, and annual meetings from the perception of the association members. Event Manag. 2010, 14, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, J.J.E.; Chon, K. Factors affecting convention participation decision-making: Developing a measurement scale. J. Travel Res. 2008, 47, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramirez, D.; Laing, J.; Mair, J. Exploring intentions to attend a convention: a gender perspective. Event Manag. 2013, 17, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preuss, H.; Alfs, C. Signaling through the 2008 Beijing Olympics: Using mega sport events to change the perception and image of the host. Euro. Sport Manag. Q. 2011, 11, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, J.J.E. Development of the convention industry in Korea. J. Conv. Event Tour. 2005, 6, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huo, Y. Meeting Planners’ Perception on Convention Destination Attributes: Empirical Evidence from Six Major Asian Convention Cities. J. Bus. Inq. 2018, 13, 74–84. [Google Scholar]
- Esses, V.M.; Medianu, S.; Lawson, A.S. Uncertainty, threat, and the role of the media in promoting the dehumanization of immigrants and refugees. J. Soc. Issues. 2013, 69, 518–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S. Audience involvement and film tourism experiences: Emotional places, emotional experiences. Tour. Manag. 2012, 33, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehto, X.; Douglas, A.C.; Park, J. Mediating the effects of natural disasters on travel intention. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2008, 23, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chew, E.Y.T.; Jahari, S.A. Destination image as a mediator between perceived risks and revisit intention: A case of post-disaster Japan. Tour. Manag. 2014, 40, 382–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, J.; Robertson, N.; Shaw, M. An investigation of perceived value and consumable goods. Asia Pac. Adv. Consum. Res. 2001, 4, 350–354. [Google Scholar]
- Law, R.; Qi, S.; Buhalis, D. Progress in tourism management: A review of website evaluation in tourism research. Tour. Manag. 2010, 31, 297–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grant, Y.N.; Weaver, P.A. The meeting selection process: A demographic profile of attendees clustered by criteria utilized in selecting meetings. Hosp. Res. J. 1996, 20, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Go, F.; Zhang, W. Applying importance-performance analysis to Beijing as an international meeting destination. J. Travel Res. 1997, 35, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roehl, W.S.; Fesenmaier, D.R. Risk perceptions and pleasure travel: An exploratory analysis. J. Travel Res. 1992, 30, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jennings, G.; Weiler, B. Mediating meaning: Perspectives on brokering quality tourist experiences. In Quality Tourism Experiences; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2006; pp. 75–96. [Google Scholar]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; Organ, D.W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Manag. 1986, 12, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Crouch, G.I.; del Chiappa, G.; Perdue, R.R. International convention tourism: A choice modelling experiment of host city competition. Tour. Manag. 2019, 71, 530–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mair, J.; Lockstone-Binney, L.; Whitelaw, P.A. The motives and barriers of association conference attendance: Evidence from an Australasian tourism and hospitality academic conference. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2018, 34, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandža Bajs, I. Tourist perceived value, relationship to satisfaction, and behavioral intentions: The example of the Croatian tourist destination Dubrovnik. J. Travel Res. 2015, 54, 122–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaudhuri, A.; Holbrook, M.B. The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. J. Mark. 2001, 65, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Author | Motivation Factors |
---|---|
Grant and Weaver (1996) | Benefits: Program Usefulness, Destination Enjoyment |
Oppermann and Chon (1997) | Benefits: Program Usefulness, Destination Enjoyment |
Ngamsom and Beck (2000) | Benefits: Program Usefulness, Destination Enjoyment Sacrifice: Perceived Cost |
Rittichainuwat, Beck, and Lalopa (2001) | Benefits: Program Usefulness, Destination Enjoyment Sacrifice: Perceived Cost, Perceived Threat |
Severt, Wang, Chen, and Breiter (2007) | Benefits: Program Usefulness, Destination Enjoyment Sacrifice: Perceived Cost |
Zhang, Leung, and Qu (2007) | Benefits: Program Usefulness, Destination Enjoyment Sacrifice: Perceived Cost |
Yoo and Chon (2008) | Benefits: Program Usefulness, Destination Enjoyment Sacrifice: Perceived Cost, Perceived Threat |
Mair and Thompson (2009) | Benefits: Program Usefulness, Destination Enjoyment Sacrifice: Perceived Cost, Perceived Threat |
Fjelstul, Severt, and Breiter (2010) | Benefits: Program Usefulness, Destination Enjoyment Sacrifice: Perceived Cost |
Tanford, Montgomery, and Nelson (2012) | Benefits: Program Usefulness, Destination Enjoyment Sacrifice: Perceived Cost |
Dragin-Jensen, Schnittka, Feddersen, Kottemann, and Rezvani (2018) | Benefits: Program Usefulness, Destination Enjoyment Sacrifice: Perceived Cost |
Construct | Operational Definition | Reference |
---|---|---|
Technological Support | Effectiveness of information technology related service which provided via website and mobile application | Law, Qi and Buhalis (2010) |
Program Usefulness | Conference participants’ overall perceptions towards conference program’s professionalism and expertise | Grant and Weaver (1996) |
Destination Enjoyment | Conference participants’ enjoyment and delight felt while being in the destination | Go and Zhang (1997) |
Perceived Cost | An individual’s perception of cost caused from geographic distance | Ngamsom and Beck (2000) |
Perceived Threat, | An individual’s perception of insecurity and danger due to destination’s political risk | Roehl and Fesenmaier (1992) Sönmez and Graefe (1998) |
Perceived Value | An individual’s perception of value regarding achieving initial purpose of participating | Kim et al. (2007) |
Media Exposure of North Korea News | The intensity of media exposure regarding North Korea missile threats | Jennings and Weiler (2006) |
Measure | Items | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | |||
Female | 57 | 29.7 | |
Male | 135 | 70.3 | |
Age | |||
20–29 | 66 | 34.4 | |
30–39 | 66 | 34.4 | |
40–49 | 31 | 16.1 | |
50–59 | 19 | 9.9 | |
Above 60 | 10 | 5.2 | |
Job | |||
Graduate student | 89 | 46.4 | |
Professor | 93 | 48.4 | |
Others | 10 | 5.2 | |
No. of time to visit Seoul | |||
First time | 148 | 77.1 | |
Second time | 22 | 11.5 | |
Third time | 10 | 5.2 | |
More | 12 | 6.3 | |
Nationality | |||
Asia | 23 | 12 | |
America | 32 | 16.7 | |
Europe | 62 | 32.3 | |
Others | 75 | 39 | |
N = 192 | (%) 100.0 |
Constructs | Items | Factor Loading | CR | AVE | Cronbach’s α |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Technological Support-Usefulness | The website/app of this conference enables me to search useful information faster | 0.882 | 0.919 | 0.791 | 0.904 |
The website/app of this conference enables me to find useful information in time | 0.916 | ||||
The website/app of this conference enhances my effectiveness searching useful information | 0.858 | ||||
Technological Support-Ease of Use | The website/app of this conference is easy to use | 0.897 | 0.862 | 0.676 | 0.848 |
The website/app of this conference is easy to become skillful at using it | 0.814 | ||||
My interaction with the website/app of this conference is clear and understandable | 0.852 | ||||
Program Usefulness | Attending this conference helps me to enhance my knowledge | 0.829 | 0.889 | 0.730 | 0.815 |
Attending this conference helps me to do my academic job better | 0.847 | ||||
I find this conference useful for my personal or professional achievement | 0.740 | ||||
Destination Enjoyment | Seoul has wonderful tourist attractions | 0.862 | 0.914 | 0.782 | 0.895 |
Visiting Seoul is fun and exciting | 0.826 | ||||
I expect Seoul to be an enjoyable place to visit | 0.842 | ||||
Perceived Cost | I think the distance to this conference location is too far | 0.906 | 0.821 | 0.615 | 0.823 |
I think the travel time to get to this conference location takes too long | 0.889 | ||||
I think the expense for traveling Seoul is too high | 0.740 | ||||
Perceived Threats | Because of North Korea, traveling to Seoul should be avoided | 0.904 | 0.903 | 0.757 | 0.913 |
Traveling to Seoul is risky due to confrontation over Korea peninsular | 0.895 | ||||
I think I cannot enjoy my trip to Seoul due to North Korea | 0.905 | ||||
Perceived Value | Attending this conference is a good idea | 0.836 | 0.896 | 0.743 | 0.831 |
I think my decision to attend this conference is the right decision | 0.727 | ||||
Attending this conference is a pleasant experience | 0.830 | ||||
Revisit Intention | If I get the chance to travel, I intend to revisit this destination, Seoul. | 0.856 | 0.925 | 0.805 | 0.905 |
When I go on travelling, the probability that I revisit Seoul is high | 0.843 | ||||
I would positively recommend Seoul to other people | 0.796 | ||||
Media Exposure of North Korea News | I see news about North Korean missile issue via traditional media (TV, newspaper, magazine). | 0.771 | 0.751 | 0.507 | 0.847 |
I see news about North Korean missile issue via internet (including social media). | 0.792 | ||||
I pay much attention to the news about North Korean missile lately | 0.809 |
TSU | TSE | PU | DE | PC | PT | PV | RI | ME | Mean | S.D. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSU | 0.889 | 3.498 | 0.841 | ||||||||
TSE | 0.314 | 0.822 | 3.630 | 0.833 | |||||||
PU | 0.247 | 0.224 | 0.885 | 4.130 | 0.653 | ||||||
DE | 0.159 | 0.104 | 0.396 | 0.884 | 3.854 | 0.808 | |||||
PC | 0.065 | 0.069 | 0.102 | 0.035 | 0.784 | 2.147 | 0.722 | ||||
PT | 0.142 | 0.046 | 0.038 | 0.042 | 0.040 | 0.870 | 2.495 | 0.986 | |||
PV | 0.336 | 0.0173 | 0.383 | 0.056 | 0.051 | 0.063 | 0.862 | 3.870 | 0.639 | ||
RI | 0.113 | 0.201 | 0.445 | 0.492 | 0.040 | 0.082 | 0.037 | 0.897 | 3.846 | 0.799 | |
ME | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.000 | 0.006 | 0.004 | 0.048 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.713 | 3.971 | 0.733 |
H. | Paths | Estimates (t-Value) | Results |
---|---|---|---|
H1 | Technological Support → Perceived Value | 0.277 (2.942) | Supported |
H2 | Program Usefulness → Perceived Value | 0.475 (4.469) | Supported |
H3 | Destination Enjoyment → Perceived Value | 0.074 (0.989) | Not supported |
H4 | Program Cost → Perceived Value | −0.002 (−0.024) | Not supported |
H5 | Program Threats → Perceived Value | −0.160 (−2.274) | Supported |
H6 | Perceived Value → Revisit Intention | 0.218 (2.624) | Supported |
H7-1 | Media Exposure of North Korea → Program Threats | 0.198 (2.251) | Supported |
H7-2 | Media Exposure of North Korea → Perceived Value | 0.157 (1.935) | Not supported |
H7-3 | Media Exposure of North Korea → Revisit Intention | 0.120 (1.392) | Not supported |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lee, P.; Koo, C.; Chung, N. The Threats of North Korea’s Missile and Visitors’ International Conference Choice Behavior. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5097. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185097
Lee P, Koo C, Chung N. The Threats of North Korea’s Missile and Visitors’ International Conference Choice Behavior. Sustainability. 2019; 11(18):5097. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185097
Chicago/Turabian StyleLee, Pam, Chulmo Koo, and Namho Chung. 2019. "The Threats of North Korea’s Missile and Visitors’ International Conference Choice Behavior" Sustainability 11, no. 18: 5097. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185097
APA StyleLee, P., Koo, C., & Chung, N. (2019). The Threats of North Korea’s Missile and Visitors’ International Conference Choice Behavior. Sustainability, 11(18), 5097. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185097