Next Article in Journal
Communities’ Livelihood Vulnerability to Climate Variability in Ethiopia
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterizing Stakeholders of Aging-in-Place through Social Network Analysis: A Study of Nanjing, China
Previous Article in Journal
Beyond Gathering the ‘Low-Hanging Fruit’ of Green Technology for Improved Environmental Performance: an Empirical Examination of the Moderating Effects of Proactive Environmental Management and Business Strategies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatial Differences in China’s Population Aging and Influencing Factors: The Perspectives of Spatial Dependence and Spatial Heterogeneity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Population and Workforce Aging on Economic Growth: Case Study of Taiwan

1
Department of Accounting Information, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung 400-439, Taiwan
2
Department of Public Finance and Taxation, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung 400-439, Taiwan
3
Department of Economics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100-116, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(22), 6301; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226301
Submission received: 3 October 2019 / Revised: 30 October 2019 / Accepted: 7 November 2019 / Published: 9 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aging: Healthcare, Inequalities, Challenges and Trends)

Abstract

:
Taiwan’s population is aging at a fast pace, and its aged society is expected to transition into a hyper-aged society within eight years. Population aging has been a matter of international concern; however, there remain differing views about its economic impact. Thus, this study aims to examine the impact of population and workforce aging on Taiwan using quarterly data from 1981–2017. The empirical results demonstrate that an aging workforce has a significantly positive impact on the rate of economic growth. However, the old-age dependency ratio has a significantly negative effect on economic growth. The empirical findings indicate that human capital is essential for total factor productivity (TFP) growth and that workforce and population aging mainly impact productivity through TFP. Accounting for policy factors, increasing the supply of the eldercare workforce and foreign manpower contribute toward countering the negative impact of an aging population on national economic growth. Policies on retirement, pension systems, health care, and human capital accumulation that target the aged population are discussed, accompanied by policy suggestions.

1. Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines an aging society as one where more than 7% of the population is aged 65 years or above, an aged society as one in which this age group accounts for more than 14% of the total population, and a hyper-aged society as one wherein this rate is greater than 20%. Taiwan became an aging society in 1993 (Figure 1), and in April 2018, the Ministry of the Interior officially announced that Taiwan had become an aged society. At the end of March in the same year, those aged 65 years and above accounted for 14.05% of Taiwan’s total population, indicating that one in every seven persons was a senior citizen. According to the Population Projections for R.O.C. (Taiwan): 2016–2061 published by the National Development Council, Taiwan is expected to become a hyper-aged society by 2026.
Taiwan’s population is aging at a fast pace, and its aged society is expected to transition into a hyper-aged society within eight years. According to estimates by the National Development Council, Taiwan’s aging rate is significantly greater than those in Japan (11 years), Canada (14 years), the United States (16 years), France (29 years), Germany (37 years), and the United Kingdom (51 years). South Korea (9 years) reports a similar aging rate (see Table 1).
With rapid demographic changes over the past 20 years, the closely related labor market has also experienced significant changes. With the Taiwanese society experiencing population aging and sub-replacement fertility, the ratio of the youth workforce to total population continues to decline, while that of individuals aged 55 years and above is increasing (see Figure 2). Numerous studies explore the impact of population aging on productivity and economic development. Aiyar et al. [1], for example, find that workforce aging in Europe negatively impacts the economic growth rate. Similarly, Bloom et al. [2] and Maestas et al. [3] suggest that population aging negatively affects economic growth in Asia and the United States. By contrast, Börsch-Supan and Weiss [4] state that while aging employees tend to commit more mistakes, there is no visible decline in their productivity. Likewise, Burtless [5] indicates that aging employees help increase productivity. Prettner [6] notes that whether extended life expectancy negatively impacts economic growth is dependent on the relative value of the death and birth rates. In sum, the literature offers inconsistent conclusions. This study aims to address this inconsistency by investigating the impact of population aging and human resources aging on Taiwan’s economy.
The continued increase in Taiwan’s elderly population has made the government and society aware of the age group’s need for medical care, welfare, and long-term care. In 2008, the Taiwanese government implemented the first generation of the ten-year long-term care plan, and in 2017, it initiated the second generation of the plan, also referred to as Long-Term Care 2.0. The objectives of the policy are to combine public and private resources at all levels and integrate resources for medical care, long-term care, and preventive healthcare to perfect community care systems and mechanisms and create qualitative, affordable, and accessible long-term care services.
This study empirically analyzes 1981–2017 data published by the Taiwanese government (e.g., PC-AXIS database) and related entities including the Department of Household Registration Affairs, Ministry of the Interior; Department of Statistics, Ministry of Health and Welfare; and Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan. The analysis focus on the impact of workforce aging and the population dependency ratio on economic growth, the primary channel through which population and workforce aging impacts economic growth, and the influence of government policies for eldercare and medical expenses on economic growth. The results show that an aging workforce is significantly and positively related to GDP growth rate. A decomposition of the dependency ratio suggests that the old-age dependency ratio has a significantly negative effect, while the youth dependency ratio has no significant effect. Since productivity is an accumulation of different economic factors [7,8], this study decomposes productivity into real capital, human capital, and total factor productivity (TFP). The empirical findings indicate that human capital is essential for total factor productivity (TFP) growth and that an aging workforce and population mainly impact productivity through TFP. In addition, the integration of policy factors into the model shows that increasing the supply of eldercare workforce and foreign manpower contributed to counter the negative impact caused by population aging on national economic growth.
This remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 reviews the literature on population and workforce aging. Section 3 describes the research design, including the data and empirical models used in this study. Section 4 discusses the empirical results and analysis. Section 5 provides concluding remarks.

2. Literature Review

There are several discussions on the ambiguous effect of population aging on productivity and economic growth. Lindh and Malmberg [9] analyze 1950–1990 data for OECD countries and find that workers aged 50–64 years help increase productivity, workforce members aged 65 years and above negatively impact productivity, and the younger workforce has no significant impact on productivity. Aiyar et al.’s [1] cross-country empirical research analyzes the impact of labor force aging on workforce productivity using OECD data for 28 European countries from 1950 to 2014. Their results suggest that an increasing proportion of employees aged 55–64 years significantly reduces total productivity, while the old-age dependency ratio and the young-age dependency ratio have no significant impact. Manabu and Hosoyama [10] indicate that population aging leads to a reduction in the growth rate of the labor force and capital stock (due to the reduction of savings rate). And, the accompanied situation is a downward pressure on the real return to physical capital, and upward pressure on real wage rates. They conclude the demographic shock leads to an increase in tax and pension burdens, decreases net economic welfare, and negatively affects the economic growth rate. Furthermore, they suggest that the government could make adjustments to important elements of pension systems (e.g., raise the saving incentives and saving rate) and could mitigate negative impacts of population aging and improve economic welfare for future generations. Batini et al. [11] suggest that population aging could reduce aggregate growth in the United States, Japan, and other industrial countries; however, it contributes to the economic growth of developing countries as the relative size of their working-age population increases. Bloom et al. [2] analyze the impact of demographic changes on economic growth in Asia from 1960 to 2005. Their results reveal that while the young-age dependency ratio has a significant and positive impact on economic growth, the old-age dependency ratio has a significantly negative effect on short-term economic growth but an insignificantly negative effect on long-term growth. They analyze the various behavioral responses that come with the shift in age structure: an increase in female labor force participation as fertility declines, an increase in savings, and an increase in education. These factors act together and may offset any negative effects of a shift in the age structure; thus, an insignificant effect of rising elderly shares on economic performance has been observed.
Prettner [6] points out that a shift in age structure results in a shift of resources to R&D and consequently fosters per capita output growth. When intertemporal knowledge spillovers are strong, the growth effect would be long-lasting. He proposes that ongoing demographic changes do not necessarily hamper technological progress and, therefore, economic prosperity. Simultaneously decreasing birth and death rates can even lead to an increase in the economic growth rate. Similar insights are provided by Aksoy et al. [12]. They provide empirical evidence of the link between demographic structure and innovation activity. The patent application is positively affected by middle-aged cohorts (working-age cohorts) and negatively by retirees. The innovation activities can serve as a channel, being particularly important for generating reduced long-term output growth due to aging.
From labor supply and human capital accumulation perspectives, Burtless [5] shows that in the United States, the productivity of workers aged 60–74 years is not lower than that of those aged 25–59 years. He concludes that workers with lower productivity exit the workforce at a younger age, while more productive ones remain in the workforce into old age. Lee and Mason [13] also highlight the linkage between human capital investments and economic growth. They propose that as fertility falls in other Asian countries, spending per child will rise, with beneficial effects for future labor productivity and economic growth. To some degree, the population aging effects are reserved as the quality of labor will be substituted for quantity of labor. Börsch-Supan and Weiss [4] examine productivity data for a large-scale car assembly plant in Germany and conclude that employees continue to report increasing productivity until the age of 60 years. In addition, even in environments requiring intensive physical work, the decline in the physical ability of aging workers is compensated for by traits that appear to increase with age, such as the experience and ability to function within a team in high-pressure situations. Bloom et al. [14] indicate that increased longevity—a key driver of population aging—can change life-cycle behavior, leading to a longer working life, higher savings, and more investment in human capital. Benhabib and Spiegel [15] find that human capital positively influences TFP growth. Human capital not only facilitates domestic technological innovation but also speeds up the adoption of foreign technology. In addition, human capital can serve as an agent in attracting physical capital accumulation. Panda [16] indicates the positive externalities associated with college education on TFP growth and provides insights related to the importance of schooling. Lee and Mason [13] also highlight the linkage between human capital investments and economic growth. They propose that as fertility falls in other Asian countries, spending per child will rise, with beneficial effects for future labor productivity and economic growth. To some degree, the quality of labor will be substituted for quantity of labor. Chanda and Panda [17] confirm the positive role of human capital contributing to higher productivity growth.
From the foreign manpower perspectives, Hui and Hashi [18] identify that foreign labor and immigration are major contributions to population and economic growth in Singapore. Harper [19] proposes that immigration has the potential to prevent population decline, maintain the size of the labor force (and thus the support ratio), and slow population aging. There are also the indirect effects of migration on innovation, economic growth, employment, and welfare. Felbermayr et al. [20], Jaumotte et al. [21], Boubtane et al. [22], Borjas [23], Aleksynska and Tritah [24] also point out that immigrants’ human capital can mitigate domestic labor shortage level and positively impact economic growth.
Bloom et al. [14] suggest the important roles played by the policy and institutional environment in determining the economic growth effects of population aging. Aiyar et al. [1] propose that policies, such as increasing effective access to healthcare services, improving vocational training, and boosting innovation activities, can help mitigate the negative productivity impact of an aging workforce. Vogel et al. [25] address three adjustment channels, i.e., investing abroad, endogenous human capital formation, and increasing the retirement age, that can mitigate the detrimental effects of aging. Combining endogenous human capital formation with an increasing retirement age could reduce the welfare loss of population aging.

3. Research Design

3.1. Data and Variable Definitions

This study examines Taiwan quarterly data from 1981 to 2017. Data sources include the PC-AXIS database and other information publicly available on government websites, as well as reports published by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan; Department of Household Registration, Ministry of the Interior; and Department of Statistics, Ministry of Health and Welfare. Table 2 reports the variable definitions and data sources.

3.2. Empirical Model

This study examines the impact of Taiwan’s aging society on its economic growth rate by using the old-age dependency ratio (ODAR) and aging workforce (AgeWorker) as proxies for population and workforce aging. We conduct an empirical regression analysis on time series data for 1981–2017 and employ the ordinary least squares method. Given the annual variance in total population and its potential effects, the analysis uses the national average real GDP per worker as a proxy for economic productivity. In the regression model, ∆lnWGDP is the first-order differential for the natural logarithm of WGDP (the same applies to all other variables). Previous research highlights that healthcare policies could address growing concerns related to an aging society (e.g., [1]). Thus, this analysis adopts the eldercare workforce (Elder_Care) to proxy the policy effect. To observe the mediating effect of policies related to an aging population and workforce, the interaction terms E l d e r _ C a r e · O A D R   and   E l d e r _ C a r e · A g e W o r k e r are included in the model.
Taiwan, as most developed and developing countries, is confronted with the problem of declining fertility rates and an aging population in recent years. This phenomenon means the pool of domestic labor supply growth is shrinking. To address the demographic challenges of an aging population, the Taiwan government relax restrictions and implement immigration and foreign labor policies to attract foreign manpower. Many studies document the impact of immigration and foreign labor on economic growth. (e.g., [18,20,21,23,24]). We adopt the ratio of foreign workers with residency (ForWorker) to capture the foreign manpower effect.
In addition, this study controls for several determinants of economic growth, including the youth dependency ratio (YADR), employment rate (Employ), ratio of workforce with college or higher educational attainment (WHEDU), investment rate (Invest), and previous year ∆lnWGDP (∆lnWGDPt-1). The empirical model is as follows:
Δ ln W G D P t = β 0 + β 1 Δ ln O A D R t + β 2 Δ ln A g e W o r k e r t + β 3 E l d e r _ C a r e t + β 4 E l d e r _ C a r e t × Δ ln O A D R t   + β 5   E l d e r _ C a r e t × Δ ln A g e W o r k e r t     + β 6 F o r W o r k e r t + β 7 F o r W o r k e r t × Δ ln O A D R t   + β 8   F o r W o r k e r t × Δ ln A g e W o r k e r t +   C o n t r o l   v a r i a b l e s t + ε t .

4. Empirical Results and Analysis

4.1. Results of Unit Root Tests

The results of unit root tests are reported in Table 3. We implement the augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) [26], Phillips–Perron (PP) [27], and Kwiatkowski–Phillips–Schmidt–Shin (KPSS) [28] tests. In the level form, the ADF, PP, and KPSS tests all indicate the time series is non-stationary for all the variables except for Invest. We transform variables into first-order differential forms and the results of unit root tests confirm the stationarity at the first differences.

4.2. Descriptive Statistics

Table 4 presents the descriptive statistics for all the variables employed in this research. The mean of the quarterly real GDP per worker (WGDP) is NT $217,345, and it ranges between NT $82,433 and NT $364,239 with a median of NT $221,978. During the sample period, from 1981 to 2017, the quarterly ratio of workers aged 55–64 years and above to the total workforce (AgeWorker) reports a minimum value of 6.61% in the fourth quarter of 2002 and a maximum value of 13.20% in the fourth quarter of 2017. The old-age dependency ratio (OADR) shows an increasing pattern with rising life expectancy, whereas the youth dependency ratio (YADR) indicates a substantially decreasing trend with a declining fertility rate. The ratio of the eldercare workforce demonstrates a continually increasing trend over the research period. Table 3 presents AgeWorker, OADR, YADR, Elder_Care, Employ, WHEDU, Invest, and ForWorker as ratios, and thus, the values are relatively small. The values for the remaining economic variables, that is, WGDP and KW, are relatively large. To reduce the variation in the numerical scale, the analysis employs the natural logarithm for these variables to enhance homogeneity.

4.3. Regression Analysis: Impact of Population and Workforce Aging on GDP

Table 5 reports the results of regressing the aging population and workforce on GDP. In column (1), the significantly positive coefficient for Δ ln A g e W o r k e r indicates that individuals aged 55 years and above in the workforce positively contribute to the GDP growth rate in Taiwan. The negative coefficient for the rate of change in the old-age dependency ratio ( Δ ln OADR) shows that the increasing aging population might slow down economic development.
Life expectancy in Taiwan has been steadily increasing over the decades. The longer the lifespan, the greater the incentive for workers to increase the number of work years. The ratio of workers aged 55–64 years shows an upward trend in recent years. Prior research documents that a continually aging workforce could be detrimental to economic productivity (e.g., [1,2,10,11]). By contrast, our empirical results reveal that workforce aging does not have a negative impact, but a beneficial one, and is consistent with insights of Börsch-Supan and Weiss [4] and Malmberg and Halvarsson [29] indicate that older workforce influence and enhance the ability to learn among both young and prime-age workers. This creates a kind of learning-by-seeing or learning-by-interacting relationship between workers of different age groups and is good for productivity. Börsch-Supan and Weiss [4] show that the average age-productivity profile of individual workers is increasing until age 65. They point out the older worker’ experience is the crucial characteristic that keeps their productivity from falling and suggest that older workers are especially able to grasp difficult situations in vital tasks. Despite the preconceived notions and myths about an elderly workforce, a growing number of management and HR professionals believe older employees positively contribute to an organization’s development goals. According to surveys conducted by Paullin [30] and the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies [31], the most frequently mentioned advantages of having older employees are greater wisdom and maturity, professionalism, work ethics, and loyalty, and reliability; moreover, they are a valuable institutional knowledge resource in training and mentoring the younger workforce. The UK government, for example, implemented the Fuller Working Lives: a partnership approach policy in 2017 to incentivize employers to recruit, retrain, and retain older workers. The government further commits to introducing policies that not only support lifelong learning but also promote social connectedness and reduce loneliness and social isolation for older workers.
The empirical results presented thus far suggest that the aging workforce in Taiwan has a significantly positive impact on economic growth. However, the old-age dependency ratio has a significantly negative effect. According to the Population Projections for R.O.C. (Taiwan): 2016–2061, Taiwan has a constrictive population pyramid characterized by a rapidly declining birth rate and insufficient human resources. While aging workers are still considered to improve productivity, the rapid increase in the old-age dependency ratio will create a social burden. To mitigate the economic issues caused by this phenomenon, the government has implemented related policies. For instance, since the launch of the Senior Citizens Welfare Act in 1980, the government has been implementing welfare and care policies targeted at the elderly. The National Health Insurance (NHI) set up in 1995 covers medical expenses such as elderly care and has helped further improve the quality of healthcare and reduced the burden on families. In 2008, the Cabinet introduced a 10-year program to transform the nation’s long-term care system. This plan has led to the implementation of Taiwan’s first national-level, long-term care network for the elderly. In 2017, the Taiwanese government initiated the second generation of the plan, Long-Term Care 2.0., that greatly expands the scope of services provided by the government to care for the elderly. The changes to eldercare are aimed at easing the burden for more seniors and their families while generating greater efficiencies. Column (2) includes the eldercare workforce ratio (Elder_Care) to proxy the eldercare policy effect. To analyze the effectiveness of this policy implemented to address population aging, the interaction term Δ ln O A D R t × Δ ln E l d e r _ C a r e t is included in the regression model.
The significantly positive coefficient for the interaction term Δ ln O A D R t × Δ ln E l d e r _ C a r e t highlights that the expanding long-term care for the elderly can significantly mitigate the negative impact of a high old-age dependency ratio. Long-Term Care 2.0 implemented in 2017 by the Ministry of Health and Welfare prioritizes eldercare with the objective of expanding and improving existing in-home care services. Traditionally, offspring are expected to care for their elders; however, work schedules and the lack of healthcare knowledge and professional abilities tend to be hindering factors. In-home care can compensate for the dearth of caregivers during the day and offspring’s work schedule, allowing the elderly to live in their own homes instead of unfamiliar environments.
In column (3), we adopt the ratio of foreign workers with residency (ForWorker) to capture the foreign manpower effect. From the significantly positive coefficient on the interaction term Δ ln O A D R t × Δ ln F o r W o r k e r t , we find that introducing immigration and foreign labor force can partially address the negative impact of population aging. Hui and Hashi [18] identify that foreign labor and immigration are major contributions to population and economic growth in Singapore. Harper (2014) proposed that immigration has the potential to prevent population decline, maintain the size of the labor force (and thus the support ratio), and slow population aging. There are also the indirect effects of migration on innovation, economic growth, employment, and welfare. Felbermayr et al. [20], Jaumotte et al. [21], Boubtane et al. [22], Borjas [23], Aleksynska and Tritah [24] also point out that immigrants’ human capital can mitigate domestic labor shortage level and positively impact economic growth.

4.4. Regression Analysis: Channels Through which Population and Workforce Aging Impact GDP

To further explore the various channels through which population and workforce aging impact the real output, an aggregate production function is employed to facilitate the empirical analysis. Hall and Jones [8] incorporate the concept of human capital in the Solow growth model [7] and extend the production function as Y t = K t α ( A t H t ) 1 α ,, where At and Ht denote the TFP index and human capital index in period t. Dividing both sides of the equation by total labor produces y t = k t α ( A t h t ) 1 α , for which the natural logarithm is as follows:
lny t = ( 1 α ) ln A t + α ln k t + ( 1 α ) ln h t .
As shown in equation (2), the real output is a result of accumulations from various channels. The analysis employs the national average real GDP per worker, WGDP, to measure real output, y. A is the TFP index; k measures the average net real capital per worker, KW; and h is average human capital, WHEDU. The domestic population with a tertiary or higher education is used as a proxy for human capital level.
Δ ln C h a n n e l t = γ 0   + γ 1   Δ ln O A D R t +   γ 2 Δ ln A g e W o r k e r t   + γ 4 Δ ln C h a n n e l t 1   + C o n t r o l   v a r i a b l e s t + τ t .  
Since real output is accumulated from various channels, this analysis isolates each channel as a dependent variable to observe the relationship among the individual channel, AgeWorker, and the old-dependency ratio. Table 6 reports the regression results. Column (1) presents the results for WGDP listed in Table 5 and columns (2)–(4) decompose the impact into TFP, net capital per worker (KW), and human capital (WHEDU). In column (2), the coefficient for Δ ln A g e W o r k e r t is significantly positive and, thus, an increase in the aging worker ratio may enhance TFP growth. Aksoy et al. [12] find that innovation activities are positively affected by middle-aged workers, not young workers. The reason might be middle-aged workers have accumulated adequate knowledge, practical experience, and professionalism. Columns (3) and (4) show significantly negative and insignificant coefficients for Δ ln A g e W o r k e r t . This result suggests that the main channel through which aging workers can improve the GDP growth rate is an enhancement in TFP growth. We also find that the ratio of workforce with college or higher education attainment positively related to economic and TFP growth rate. The TFP index is a productivity index that measures the ratio of total output to total factor input. This ratio is based on technological progress, innovation, specialization, and efficiency improvement. Chanda and Panda [17] confirm the positive role of human capital contributing to higher productivity growth. Benhabib and Spiegel [15] point out that human capital positively influences TFP growth through facilitating domestic technological innovation and accelerating the adoption of foreign technology. Panda [16] suggests the importance of education on TFP growth. Lee and Mason [13] also highlight the linkage between human capital investments and economic growth. They propose that declining birth rate might boost the spending per child and have beneficial effects for future labor productivity and economic growth.

5. Conclusions

This research aims to analyze the impact of Taiwan’s aging population and aging workforce on its economic growth. In particular, it examines the impact of an aging workforce and the old-age dependency ratio on the growth rate of GDP. It also identifies the channels through which population aging influences GDP growth rate and explores the effectiveness of related government policies.
The empirical results for 1981–2017 highlight an increasing aging workforce that has significantly and positively impacted productivity. Nevertheless, the increase in the old-age dependency ratio has a significantly negative effect on the GDP growth rate, and this is mainly because of the decline in TFP. Accounting for policy factors, the empirical results suggest that improving healthcare and increasing the supply of the eldercare workforce and foreign manpower contribute toward countering the negative impact of an aging population on national economic growth. While numerous developed and developing countries are facing the challenge of an aging population, Taiwan is aging at a faster rate than Japan, Canada, the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom, among others. The Taiwanese government should, therefore, implement policies to improve the elderly’s long-term care and to properly relax restrictions on foreign manpower. Social welfare support must also become an important aspect of Taiwan’s social security framework. Economic development strategies must be adjusted to the reality of a falling birth rate and an increasing elderly population. In response to its aging human resources, the Taiwanese government should allocate resources to help labor-intensive and low-skilled industries transform into more innovation-oriented and knowledge-intensive ones.
Due to imperfections in the employment policy scheme for elders previously implemented by the government, such as lack of flexible scope of work and no subsidy scheme for the employer, most of the elderly population is still facing a low employment rate today. The government is advised to have a further understanding of the employment issues faced by the elderly population with different educational or skill levels and is also advised to implement policies that will be enforced in employment services and job training for respective elderly populations in the future. If workforce aging is good for productivity growth, policies should be targeted as finding a means to stimulate continued labor-participation among older workers.
Planning of employment policy for the elderly population is advised as follows: first, the government should establish a more comprehensive database for elderly employees in order to draft up proper policy based on such a database. It should be noted that elderly population nowadays might have a relatively low educational level; however, due to the expected significant advances in educational systems in the future, elderly populations of future generations may have better skill-sets and a healthier physical status than the present generation, as such their opinions on elderly employment may differ greatly. Therefore, the policy-making strategy for elderly employment based on the present statistical research shall also include the possible varied conditions of elderly citizens in the future generation. Second, the government should implement supporting measures for postponing retirement, and reduce the age restrictions on the employment of the middle-aged and elderly workforce. In view of the obvious trend of an aging society and retirement at a younger age, the government should modify the laws based on the fiscal scheme and the needs of labor resources. Such laws are aimed to create more beneficial working conditions for the elderly workforce and are expected to encourage the elderly employee to stay in their job position for a longer time. Furthermore, it is advised to expedite the drafting of an employment policy with more flexible conditions, as well as a gradual or staged scheme for retirement of the elderly, to modify relevant labor laws by reducing age restrictions for middle-aged and elderly population, and introduce employment services for elderly citizens whose age is more than 65 years old. Third, an aging society and low birth rate have resulted in a change of demographic structure. Labor resources at ages between 15 to 64 years old have continued to decrease. The labor force participation rate shall be increased for all ranges of working ages in order to mitigate the risk of labor resource shortage in the near future. People who have already retired at a young age or who are middle-aged/elderly retirees but still have sufficient physical capacity, skills, experience, and willingness to return-to-work should be encouraged to enter re-employment. Fourth, middle-aged and elderly employees usually face the problems of age-discrimination, declined physical status, and stereotyping within society. Therefore, the government should implement policies that include the prohibition of age-discrimination, provisions of job stabilization, and re-employment measures for the jobless, so as to raise the participation rate of middle-aged citizens. For the elderly workforce, the government should implement policies such as reducing restrictions through a Regular Contract for elderly citizens of more than 65 years old, subsidizing the employer who hires or re-employs elderly retirees, expanding the subsidy scope for employment facilitation, and establishing a human resource database of retirees. All these measures are expected to enhance re-employment for the elderly population. Fifth, as indicated by Bloom et al. [14], to address the funding gap caused by the intergenerational transfers implicit pension systems is an important policy consideration. Pay-as-you-go pension systems mean that an increasingly small share of working-age people will make transfers to an increasingly large share of the elderly. Policies that can help reduce social burden include adjusting premiums and benefits or making a transition to full funded systems, whereby individuals effectively draw at least part of their pensions from investments made during their time in work. Coping with an aged society will require a concerted effort that includes comprehensive pension restructuring by the government, calculated savings and investment strategies by the aging and elderly, support from the working-age population, and coordinated measures from financial-planning industries. More education is needed on the importance of investment and savings for old age. Finally, improvements in the quality of elder healthcare and related social welfare programs must become an essential aspect of a national social security system. Policymakers should thoroughly review and develop policies that address the changing demographic needs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.-H.H., Y.-J.L., and H.-F.L.; methodology, W.-H.H. and H.-F.L.; software, W.-H.H. and Y.-J.L.; resources, W.-H.H.; writing—original draft preparation, W.-H.H., Y.-J.L., and H.-F.L.; writing—review and editing, W.-H.H., Y.-J.L., and H.-F.L.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We thank “Higher Education Sprout Project” of the National Taichung University of Science and Technology and the Ministry of Education, Taiwan, R.O.C for manuscript editing. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aiyar, S.; Ebeke, C.; Shao, X. The Impact of Workforce Aging on European Productivity; IMF Working Paper No. 16/238; IMF: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloom, D.E.; Canning, D.; Finlay, J.E. Population Aging and Economic Growth in Asia. The Economic Consequences of Demographic Change in East Asia. NBER-EASE 2010, 19, 61–89. [Google Scholar]
  3. Maestas, N.; Mullen, K.J.; Powell, D. The Effect of Population Aging on Economic Growth, the Labor Force and Productivity; NBER Working Paper No. w22452; NBER: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  4. Börsch-Supan, A.; Weiss, M. Productivity and Age: Evidence from Work Teams at the Assembly Line. J. Econ. Ageing 2016, 19, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Burtless, G. The Impact of Population Aging and Delayed Retirement on Workforce Productivity; Center for Retirement Research at Boston College Working Paper No. 2013-11; Center for Retirement Research, Boston College: Newton, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  6. Prettner, K. Population Aging and Endogenous Economic Growth. J. Popul. Econ. 2013, 26, 811–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Solow, R.M. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Q. J. Econ. 1956, 70, 65–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hall, R.E.; Jones, C.I. Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker than Others? Q. J. Econ. 1999, 114, 83–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lindh, T.; Malmberg, B. Age Structure Effects and Growth in the OECD, 1950–1990. J. Popul. Econ. 1999, 12, 431–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Manabu, S.; Hosoyama, H. Economic Implications of An Aging Population: The Case of Five Asian Economies; ESRI Discussion paper series 117; Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI): Dublin, Ireland, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  11. Batini, N.; Callen, T.; McKibbin, W.J. The Global Impact of Demographic Change; IMF Working Paper 06/9; IMF: Washington, DC, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  12. Aksoy, Y.; Basso, H.S.; Smith, R.P.; Grasl, T. Demographic Structure and Macroeconomic Trends. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 2019, 11, 193–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Lee, R.; Mason, A. Fertility, human capital, and economic growth over the demographic transition. Eur. J. Popul. 2010, 26, 159–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bloom, D.E.; Canning, D.; Fink, G. Implications of population ageing for economic growth. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy. 2010, 26, 583–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Benhabib, J.; Spiegel, M.M. The role of human capital in economic development evidence from aggregate cross-country data. J. Mon. Econ. 1994, 34, 143–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Panda, B. Schooling and productivity growth: Evidence from a dual growth accounting application to U.S. states. J. Prod. Anal. 2017, 48, 193–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chanda, A.; Panda, B. Productivity Growth in Goods and Services Across the Heterogeneous States of America. Econ. Inq. 2016, 54, 1021–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hui, W.T.; Hashmi, A.R. Foreign labor and economic growth policy options for Singapore. Singap. Econ. Rev. 2007, 52, 53–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Harper, S. Economic and social implications of aging societies. Science 2014, 346, 587–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Felbermayr, G.J.; Hiller, S.; Sala, D. Does immigration boost per capita income? Econ. Lett. 2010, 107, 177–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Jaumotte, F.; Koloskova, K.; Saxena, S.C. Impact of Migration on Income Levels in Advanced Economies; IMF Spillover Notes, No. 8; IMF: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  22. Boubtane, E.; Dumont, J.C.; Rault, C. Immigration and economic growth in the OECD countries, 1986–2006. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 2016, 68, 340–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Borjas, G.J. Immigration and Economic Growth; NBER Working Paper No. w25836; National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  24. Aleksynska, M.; Tritah, A. The heterogeneity of immigrants, host countries’ income and productivity: A channel accounting approach. Econ. Inq. 2015, 53, 150–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vogel, E.; Ludwig, A.; Börsch-Supan, A. Aging and Pension Reform: Extending the Retirement Age and Human Capital Formation. J. Pension Econ. Financ. 2017, 16, 81–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Said, E.; Dickey, D.A. Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive Moving Average Models of Unknown Order. Biometrika 1984, 71, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Phillips, P.C.B.; Perron, P. Testing for unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 1988, 75, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kwiatkowski, D.; Phillips, P.; Schmidt, P.; Shin, Y. Testing the null hypothesis of stationary against the alternative of a unit root. J. Econmet. 1992, 54, 159–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Malmberg, B.; Lindh, T.; Halvarsson, M. Productivity consequences of workforce ageing: Stagnation or horndal effect? Popul. Dev. Rev. 2008, 34, 238–256. [Google Scholar]
  30. Paullin, C. The Aging Workforce: Leveraging the Talents of Mature Employees. Effective Practice Guidelines Series; SHRM: Alexandria, VA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  31. Transamerica Institute. A Compendium of Findings about American Employers-15th Annual Transamerica Retirement Survey; The TCRS: Nashville, TN, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Run chart of age groups as a percentage of Taiwan’s total population. Source: National Statistics, Republic of China (Taiwan), website: www.stat.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=4.
Figure 1. Run chart of age groups as a percentage of Taiwan’s total population. Source: National Statistics, Republic of China (Taiwan), website: www.stat.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=4.
Sustainability 11 06301 g001
Figure 2. Run chart of the workforce for various age groups as a percentage of the total workforce. Source: Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, website: www.dgbas.gov.tw/.
Figure 2. Run chart of the workforce for various age groups as a percentage of the total workforce. Source: Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, website: www.dgbas.gov.tw/.
Sustainability 11 06301 g002
Table 1. Time trend for global population aging.
Table 1. Time trend for global population aging.
CountryPopulation Aged 65 and Above (% of Total)
7%10%14%20%
Taiwan1993200620182026
Japan1970198419942005
South Korea1999200720172026
Singapore1999201220182026
China2000201620252035
France1864194319902019
Germany1932195119712008
United Kingdom1929194619752026
United States1942197220132029
Canada1945198420102024
Source: World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, United Nations (2017).
Table 2. Variable Definitions.
Table 2. Variable Definitions.
Variable Definition & Source
WGDPGross Domestic Product (GDP) per worker
Unit: NT$/person
Source: Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan
AgeWorkerRatio of workers aged 55–64 years to total workforce in Taiwan
Unit: %
Source: Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan
OADR YADROld-age dependency ratio: population aged 65 years and above divided by population aged 15–64 years
Youth dependency ratio: population aged 0–14 years divided by the population aged 15–64 years
Unit: %
Source: Department of Household Registration of the Ministry of the Interior
TFPTotal factor productivity index
Unit: 2001 as base period, 100 as base period index
Source: Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan
KWNet capital per worker: net capital divided by employed population
Unit: NT$/person
Source: Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan
WHEDURatio of workforce with college or higher education to total workforce
Unit: %
Source: Department of Statistics of the Ministry of the Interior
InvestRatio of gross investment to GDP
Unit: %
Source: Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan
Elder_CareNumber of workers served in elderly long-term care, nursing, and caring institutions divided by total nursing staff
Unit: %
Source: Department of Statistics, Ministry of Health and Welfare
EmployEmployment rate: ratio of employed population to working age (15–64 years) population
Unit: %
Source: Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan
ForWorkerRatio of foreign workers with residency to total workforce
Unit: %
Source: National Immigration Agency, Ministry of Interior
Table 3. Results of augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF), Phillips–Perron (PP), and Kwiatkowski–Phillips–Schmidt–Shin (KPSS) unit root tests.
Table 3. Results of augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF), Phillips–Perron (PP), and Kwiatkowski–Phillips–Schmidt–Shin (KPSS) unit root tests.
VariableLevelsFirst-Differences
ADFPPKPSSADFPPKPSS
WGDP−0.890−0.7131.053 ***−6.043 ***−6.043 ***0.313
AgeWorker−1.902−2.1530.917 ***−6.554 ***−5.696 ***0.706
OADR−0.907−0.8681.233 ***−3.012 **−2.641 *0.695
Elder_Care−1.133−1.2041.104 ***−4.178 ***−5.530 ***0.572
YADR−1.106−1.5020.871 ***−4.253 ***−4.277 ***0.641
Employ−2.451−2.0260.948 ***−7.037 ***−6.625 ***0.250
TFP−1.045−1.0571.146 ***−5.938 ***−6.219 ***0.636
KW−1.454−1.6930.939 ***−3.836 ***−4.762 ***0.578
WHEDU−1.601−1.8211.360 ***−4.577 ***−4.974 ***0.629
Invest−5.728 ***−5.619 ***0.254
ForWorker−1.327−1.4770.903 ***−3.219 ***−3.874 ***0.223
Note: a. See Table 1 for the variable definitions. b. All variables are in natural logarithm forms. c. ***, **, and *, indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% level respectively. d. For the ADF and PP tests, Ho = Variable is non-stationary. For the KPSS test, Ho = Variable is stationary.
Table 4. Descriptive statistics.
Table 4. Descriptive statistics.
VariableUnitMeanMedianStd. Dev.MinMax
WGDPNT$217,345221,97887,85182,433364,239
AgeWorker%8.858.561.746.6113.20
OADR%13.4713.882.716.9018.89
Elder_Care%13.2314.853.584.6616.86
YADR%26.9825.308.2417.9849.45
Employ%58.5958.450.9456.9261.52
TFPindex97.42100.009.4679.99109.49
KWNT$417,499380,774175,920194,856726,844
WHEDU%38.4539.148.4224.9050.20
Invest%24.5324.612.8119.9130.40
ForWorker%3.463.220.981.675.73
Note: See Table 1 for the variable definitions.
Table 5. Impact of population and workforce aging on GDP.
Table 5. Impact of population and workforce aging on GDP.
Δ ln W G D P t
Variable (1)(2)(3)
Intercept0.213
(0.556)
0.195
(1.520)
0.226
(1.038)
Δ ln O A D R t −3.670 **
(−2.121)
−3.014 **
(−2.785)
−2.882 *
(−1.740)
Δ ln A g e W o r k e r t 1.053 *
(1.684)
1.269 **
(2.464)
0.946 *
(1.951)
Δ ln E l d e r _ C a r e t 0.481
(1.250)
0.576
(0.893)
Δ ln O A D R t × Δ ln E l d e r _ C a r e t 1.122 **
(2.403)
0.801 *
(1.665)
Δ ln A g e W o r k e r t × Δ ln E l d e r _ C a r e t 0.097
(0.862)
−0.732
(−1.025)
Δ ln Y A D R t −0.852
(−1.046)
−0.152
(−1.313)
−1.207 *
(−1.895)
Δ ln E m p l o y t −1.391 *
(−1.799)
−1.006 **
(−2.245)
−1.212 *
(−1.775)
Δ lnW H E D U t 1.528 **
(2.340)
1.331 **
(2.375)
0.822 *
(1.940)
Δ ln O A D R t × Δ lnW H E D U t 0.288
(1.203)
Δ ln A g e W o r k e r t × Δ lnW H E D U t 0.567
(0.239)
Δ ln F o r W o r k e r t 0.436
(0.584)
0.449
(1.631)
1.003
(1.050)
Δ ln O A D R t × Δ ln F o r W o r k e r t 1.263 **
(2.195)
Δ ln A g e W o r k e r t × Δ ln F o r W o r k e r t 0.916
(0.998)
Δ ln I n v e s t t 1.065 **
(2.087)
0.884 *
(1.879)
1.141
(1.549)
Δ ln W G D P t 1 −0.429 **
(−2.340)
−0.228 *
(−1.795)
−0.274 **
(−2.208)
Year DummyControlledControlledControlled
Observations148148148
Adj. R-Squared0.4610.5220.643
Note: a. See Table 1 for the variable definitions. b. ***, **, and *, indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% level (two-sided), respectively. c. t-values are presented in the parentheses.
Table 6. Channels through which population and workforce aging impact GDP.
Table 6. Channels through which population and workforce aging impact GDP.
Variable Δ ln C h a n n e l t
Δ ln W G D P t Δ ln T F P t Δ ln K W t Δ ln W H E D U t
(1)(2)(3)(4)
Intercept0.213
(0.556)
0.115
(0.332)
0.262 ***
(3.009)
0.500 ***
(2.869)
Δ ln O A D R t −3.670 **
(−2.121)
−1.681 *
(−1.827)
−0.233 **
(−2.018)
−1.612 **
(−2.147)
Δ ln A g e W o r k e r t 1.053 *
(1.684)
0.564 *
(1.713)
−0.146 *
(−1.673)
0.276
(0.381)
Δ ln Y A D R t −0.852
(−1.046)
−0.455 *
(−1.740)
1.219 **
(2.138)
1.541 *
(1.775)
Δ ln E m p l o y t −1.391 *
(−1.799)
−1.006 *
(−1.851)
−1.927
(−1.002)
0.898
(0.203)
Δ lnW H E D U t 1.528 **
(2.340)
0.976 **
(2.290)
2.532
(0.042)
Δ ln I n v e s t t 1.065 **
(2.087)
0.883 *
(1.667)
0.549 ***
(2.927)
0.019
(0.051)
Δ ln F o r W o r k e r t 0.436
(0.584)
0.352
(0.406)
1.108 *
(1.776)
0.317
(1.202)
Δ ln C h a n n e l t 1 −0.429 **
(−2.340)
−1.203 **
(−2.312)
0.135 *
(1.751)
1.158 ***
(4.443)
Observations1483737148
Adj. R-squared0.4610.2400.6350.187
Note: a. See Table 1 for the variable definitions. b. ***, **, and *, indicate significance at 1%, 5%, and 10% levels (two-sided), respectively. c. t-values are presented in the parentheses. d. The observations decrease because only data for the annual indexes of TFP and annual KW are made available by the government.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, W.-H.; Lin, Y.-J.; Lee, H.-F. Impact of Population and Workforce Aging on Economic Growth: Case Study of Taiwan. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226301

AMA Style

Huang W-H, Lin Y-J, Lee H-F. Impact of Population and Workforce Aging on Economic Growth: Case Study of Taiwan. Sustainability. 2019; 11(22):6301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226301

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Wen-Hsin, Yen-Ju Lin, and Hsien-Feng Lee. 2019. "Impact of Population and Workforce Aging on Economic Growth: Case Study of Taiwan" Sustainability 11, no. 22: 6301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226301

APA Style

Huang, W. -H., Lin, Y. -J., & Lee, H. -F. (2019). Impact of Population and Workforce Aging on Economic Growth: Case Study of Taiwan. Sustainability, 11(22), 6301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226301

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop