Next Article in Journal
Irrigation-Yield Production Functions and Irrigation Water Use Efficiency Response of Drought-Tolerant and Non-Drought-Tolerant Maize Hybrids under Different Irrigation Levels, Population Densities, and Environments
Next Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Brand Management of Alimentary Goods
Previous Article in Journal
Investigating Critical Non-Value Adding Activities and Their Resulting Wastes in BIM-Based Project Delivery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spelt Wheat: An Alternative for Sustainable Plant Production at Low N-Levels
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Motives and Role of Religiosity towards Consumer Purchase Behavior in Western Imported Food Products

by
Faheem Bukhari
1,
Saima Hussain
2,*,
Rizwan Raheem Ahmed
3,
Dalia Streimikiene
4,*,
Riaz Hussain Soomro
5 and
Zahid Ali Channar
6
1
Faculty of Business Administration, IQRA University, Defense view Shaheed-e-Millet Road (Ext), Karachi 75500, Pakistan
2
Faculty of Management Sciences, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology, SZABIST 90, Block 5, Clifton Karachi 75600, Pakistan
3
Faculty of Management Sciences, Indus University, Karachi 75300, Pakistan
4
Institute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas 44221, Lithuania
5
Institute of Health Management, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan
6
Department of Business Administration, Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Karachi 74000, Pakistan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(1), 356; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010356
Submission received: 11 November 2019 / Revised: 26 December 2019 / Accepted: 27 December 2019 / Published: 2 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability in Food Consumption and Food Security)

Abstract

:
The undertaken study examines the influence of the marketing mix, consumer attributes, and the role of religiosity towards consumer purchase behavior regarding western imported food products in Pakistan. The study has used the theory of planned behaviors as underpinning foundations for testing factors. In total, 1080 respondents from eight cities in Pakistan—Karachi, Lahore, Islamabad, Quetta, Peshawar, Hyderabad, Larkana, and Faisalabad—were part of this study. Path analysis performed through SEM (structural equation modeling). The result unveiled that product attributes, price, self-concept, brand trust, personality, and religiosity positively correlated with consumer’s purchase intention in a Muslim country. The result of this study will also help potential future candidates for the food industry, especially those aimed at using the Asian consumer market. The penetration of western imported food may also bring convergence where the nation can feel upgraded and privileged. The study also adds to the academic literature on Muslim consumer behavior by combining numerous factors on a single model, grounded in the theory of planned behavior. Limited study has analyzed religiosity and other factors in context with a Muslim majority population. This study is a preliminary effort to understand the Muslim consumer food purchase behavior inadequately investigated by the consumer researcher.

1. Introduction

Religion is documented as an essential factor that profoundly influences consumer buying decisions [1]. Religion may serve to link consumers to a style of life that determines the pattern of consumption. Studies examining the effect or impact of religion on consumer behavior are based on two aspects: religious affiliation and religiosity [2,3]. The religious association mainly explored in comparison with the denominational association or the religious identification of a person (e.g., Catholic, Protestant, and Jewish). Although religiosity (in other words, religious commitment) is a significant construct to identify the effect of ethical behavior on a consumer’s consumption and purchase behavior [4,5].
Islam, as a religion, presents a comprehensive way of life and controls the behavior of Muslim buyers, to achieve satisfaction with this life and hereafter [6]. Religious beliefs (e.g., concerning halal food) are the best guiding principle to identify food consumption choices for Muslims who actively follow religious guidelines as these rules address the Islamic tenets of food consumption [7]. Over the next 40 years, Islam will grow more rapidly than any other dominant faith. If current trends persist, by 2050, there will be nearly as many Muslims as Christians in the world [8]. This rapid increase of the global Muslim population indicates an opportunity for researchers to investigate more about Islam and Muslim consumers’ behavior in various contexts such as food consumption. Investigation of Islamic consumption patterns may add value to the academic literature on consumer behavior [9].
Among Muslim consumers, Islamic rules administer the culture, which assists as a direction in their daily lives. Muslims must spend their money for explicit purposes only such as for general living, education, health, and aiding the poor and those in need. Hence, the concept of moderation is encouraged and Muslims are told to base their usage on strict observance to this practice [10]. The Pakistani population is 97 percent Muslim with different religious beliefs as compared to the western part of the world [11]. In spite of these Islamic guidelines on appropriate food consumption and moderate spending, money spent on western imported food has been increasing in Pakistan [12]. Therefore, it is advantageous to know the consumer perception or motives behind the purchase of western imported food. Especially, as this is an increasing trend as the population grows and the general economy has developed so that there is increased discretional personal spending for the middle and upper classes in Pakistan [12,13].
Pakistani Muslim consumers may have different perceptions about western imported food products (concerning the marketing mix, personal, social, and cultural elements). Their religious commitment indeed expresses the intensity of their faith and is indicated in part through their consumption choices about western imported food products [14]. Hence, it is particularly interesting to investigate the Pakistani Muslim consumer’s motives behind the purchase of western imported food products and the role of religiosity in determining their purchase behavior. The reasons for this behavior have scarcely been studied in prior research and yet there is an opportunity to explore the factors mentioned above for the western imported food products in a Muslim dominated country like Pakistan [15,16,17,18,19]. This research proposes an essential contribution to the field of Muslim consumer’s behavior, and it also adds value to the literature on consumer behavior by employing a model wherein the single conceptual framework tests the elements, based on the theory of planned behavior. Religion is a critical element of Pakistani culture that directly affects the behavior of Pakistani consumers [20].
Furthermore, religion expressively governs cultural and social behaviors in Asian and Middle Eastern societies as compared to western nations. For these reasons, the level of religiosity needs research as an essential factor in shaping Muslim’s purchasing behavior regarding western food items in Pakistan. This area is still under-researched and many studies have suggested exploring the influences of religiosity in defining Muslim consumer’s purchase behavior in these regions in particular [21,22,23,24].
The national religion in Pakistan is Islam, in which 97% of the population is Muslim—numbering 207,774,520 inhabitants [11]. Interestingly, the people of Pakistan spend 42% of their income on food-related items; the total trade and wholesale of 17% consists of food items [11]. Pakistan’s middle and upper class spend money on imported western food items [25,26]. Throughout the first six months of the 2018 fiscal year, Pakistan spent US$312.5 million on the importing of coffee, tea, beverage whiteners, and spices, the second-largest spending category in the food products sector [27]. Pakistan has spent US$908.9 million on the import of animal or vegetable fats and oil products. In this period, the country also spent US$500.9 million on imported oilseeds and ‘oleaginous fruit’, which is the part of a plant used to produce vegetable oil [27]. It can be a fruits (e.g., olive), seeds (e.g., sesame), or nuts (e.g., walnut) [27]. Pakistan is an emerging market for the consumption of imported food items [28]. The market context for the study discussed next with an explanation of its research objectives.
  • To investigate factors affecting Muslim consumer’s purchase behavior in western imported food products in Pakistan.
  • To identify the relationships that exist between each of these factors and western imported food products purchase behavior.
  • To determine the moderation of demographic profile on a relationship between contributory factors and consumer’s purchase behavior.

Integration of Theory of Planned Behavior

The undertaken study employed the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to know the behavior intentions of Muslim consumers of western imported food products. This study is an attempt to comprehend the purchasing intention of food items consumers using the TPB model from a Pakistani perspective. According to Donald et al. [29] and Armitage and Conner [30], the TPB model mainly dominated by attitude, and several psychological new dimensions have studied with the TPB model. Such as in organic food products’ research by Robinson and Smith [31] investigated self-congruity concerning environmental consumerism. Moral obligations are tested for organic food by Arvola et al. [32], Reviews by Armitage and Conner [30] explains that TPB framework accounts for 39–50% variations in intention leading to 27–36% of the difference in a consumer’s behavior. However, Ajzen’s [33] original model assumptions verified by several studies that antecedents potentially correlate with each other [34,35,36]. Hence, the present research has included constructs such as product attributes, price, promotion, brand loyalty, brand trust, customer satisfaction, religiosity, subjective norms, self-concept, personality, lifestyle, and social class besides the TPB factors for evaluating Muslims’ customers’ purchasing aim in the context of western imported food products. This study is an attempt to comprehend the consumers’ purchase behavior employing the TPB framework in the Pakistani Muslim consumer’s context. The element of religiosity is a combination of religious dimensions, which was described in Glock and Stark’s [37] study. Since this study is based on Muslim consumer behavior in the context of western imported food, the combine notion of beliefs, practices, and knowledge about Islam and its linkage with food buying behavior is presented to explain how Muslim consumers take their food-related purchase decisions. New constructs added to TPB in prolific recent literature [34,35,37] specific to various domains. Extensions of the Ajzen [33] model over a few years have proved an improvement in the explanatory power of the framework.
The rest of the paper organized as follows: Section 2 demonstrates the review of literature and hypotheses formulation, Section 3 deals with materials and methods, Section 4 comprises of results, Section 5 deals with discussions, and Section 6 presents the conclusion. Next, the study presents practical applications and followed by theoretical contributions. Lastly, limitations and future research directions have discussed.

2. Literature Review and Hypotheses Development

2.1. Product Attributes

Product attributes are the features of products through which brands recognized and distinguished. In other words, product attributes denoted to be the descriptive aspect of a marketing plan that characterizes the consumer’s evaluative standards when selecting specific goods or services [38]. Product characteristics are discussed in terms of being either intrinsic or extrinsic. Intrinsic product attributes are specific to a product, unchangeable, and comprise features such as form, ingredients, flavor, color, and smell. Extrinsic characteristics are not a crucial part of the physical product such as value, brand name, and country of origin [39]. A study from Norway Torjusen et al. [40] reported that the traditional food quality aspects such as appearance, freshness, and taste, which they named ‘observation traits’, were important to all respondents. Most of the respondents were concerned about aspects related to food production and processing, they chose food with no harmful substances and the least possible additives. According to Dahm, Samonte, and Shows [41], the taste is as equally as an important attribute as quality, followed by price, appearance, and availability [42]. Knight [43] highlights the importance of factors like ‘country of the producer’ and ‘product quality’ and its impact on buying decision making in globally available product classes. The researchers reported that, when the imported goods are of a higher value, customers are willing to pay a higher price. Product attributes play a vital role in this research, which investigates these key attributes’ influence on consumer buying behavior concerning western imported food. These have identified during the qualitative focused interviews as flavor, taste, nutritious value, and healthiness. Understanding these attributes from a consumer’s perspective may assist the manufacturers in developing a refined marketing strategy. Thus, the above information leads to the development of the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 1 (H1):
Product attributes are positively associated with consumer’s buying intention towards western food products.

2.2. Price

Price has always remained a cornerstone for any food item in every society; therefore, pricing strategy always considers segmentation, market condition, trade margins, competitors’ price, and marketing and internal cost [43]. It is directed at distinct consumers alongside competitors [44]. Price is a major factor in determining consumers’ choices. Even though many other factors unrelated to price are important in the literature, the price is the main determinant of the purchase decision for large segments of consumers across many countries [45,46]. Thus, the above information leads to the development of the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 2 (H2):
Price is positively associated with consumer’s buying intention towards western food products.

2.3. Promotion

Marketing communication has a positive and vital impact on consumers’ purchase intentions and companies’ sales volumes. In particular, the advertising plan has an influence on the attitude and the purchase intention towards a brand [46]. Another study by Song, Safari and Mansori [47] reveals the effects of five marketing stimuli, which include marketing communication and promotion of the food items on the perceived value of consumers. Afterward, the effect of this perceived value on the actual purchase decision examined. The results showed a relationship between marketing communication and perceived customer value among organic food consumers of Malaysia. In contrast to the existing literature, findings for the same study revealed no relationship between sales promotion and product perceived value. [43,45]. Hence, the above information leads to the development of the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 3 (H3):
Promotion is positively associated with consumer’s buying intention towards western food products.

2.4. Personality

Marketers accept the buyers experienced brands as a means to comprehend their personalities. We have taken a modified questionnaire in which we used the modified items for the brand personality from the previous study [48]. According to Banerjee [49], both individual and brand personalities have an important influence on brand preference in the consumer’s mind. Consumer Preference implies that at the time of brand choice, consumers give prominence to individual personality and the personality of the chosen brand. In food products, such a relationship has also been found. According to Chang, Tseng, and Chu [50], few consumer traits lead to a positive consumer perception about food traceability, which means food items processing, production, and delivery to the consumers. The researchers used the Big Five Factor model to assess various traits of consumers and a 3M framework of motivation and personality (market, means, and motivation) for analyzing consumer’s perceptions regarding food traceability [47,50]. Among elemental traits, it was found that openness, conscientious and extroverted personalities, combined with actual material and bodily needs, tend to be linked with compound traits such as health consciousness and the need for learning. These compound traits influence situational traits (consumer perceptions of food traceability and the concern for food value) and initiate the intention to purchase. Hence, the above information leads to the development of the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 4 (H4):
Personality is positively associated with consumer’s buying intention towards western food products.

2.5. Lifestyle

The lifestyle to a certain extent defines patterns or trends of consumption. It is observed by looking at individuals’ organization, space and time, leisure activities, working hours, housing, appearance, and other daily activities. In other words, lifestyle is one important variable, which expresses consumer’s choices [51,52]. Ahaiwe et al. [53] reported several factors, which may influence consumers’ buying behavior and their brand preferences for goods and services. Among these are cultural factors, social class, values and beliefs, interests, lifestyle, and personality. These factors jointly referred to as psychographic variables, which play a considerable role in consumers’ preferences for products [54]. In a Chinese study comparing lifestyles and their impact on purchase intentions for domestic and imported food products, three groups identified which each had different behaviors: risk-takers, traditionalists, and experiencers. It was found that risk-takers and traditionalists were associated with purchasing imported fruits [55]. Another study suggests a food-related lifestyle model comprised of five components to explain consumption behavior: quality, methods to shopping, food consumption situation, manner of cooking, and purchasing motives [51,56]. Hence, the above information leads to the development of the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 5 (H5):
Lifestyle is positively associated with consumer’s buying intention towards western food products.

2.6. Family (Subjective Norms)

A subjective norm generally explained as a person’s awareness about what essential others consider the individual should comply with [57]. The association between subjective norms and attitudes towards behavior has been verified and tested. For example, researchers have established the pathway from subjective norms to attitudes towards behavior and found it significant [58]. Within the framework of subjective norms, reference groups somehow affect the values and behavior of others. Reference groups, particularly buyer groups of references—for example, institution and trade, professional institutions, social organizations, friends, family members—influence product selection and the choice of a specific brand. Most purchases influenced by the opinions of the groups of references, which include friends and professional institutions [59]. Parents have an impact on a person’s purchase decision. Moreover, the dominance of the preference of the husband or the wife differs from the product category. Thus, in food items, the wife is predominantly the key decision-maker. However, children also influence at the time of purchasing [60]. Hence, the above information leads to the development of the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 6 (H6):
Family is positively associated with consumer’s buying intention towards western food products.

2.7. Social Class

Social class is used as a basis for market segmentation because members of different classes reflect different consumption patterns [61]. Especially in those countries where class differences exist, social class significantly impacts on consumer decisions [62]. When it comes to consumers’ response to a new product, research indicates differences between the low and high socioeconomic classes. The low socioeconomic class is less likely to purchase a new product or one with new technologies. According to Majabadi et al. [63], there is a class difference in consumer preferences towards food products, prices, and concepts of value. This social class research has been investigated as an important factor to explore if it influences consumer’s purchase behavior. Social class also is shown to connect with patterns of media usage, language patterns, source credibility, and spending behavior [56,62]. Social class is yet another important factor that needs to be studied in the context of food buying behavior. In a country such as Pakistan, with its complex history and deeply rooted perceptions of social class, social class may impact the purchase of western imported food products. Since this study based on the purchase behavior of western imported food in Pakistan, understanding the social classes in this context is a prerequisite. Hence, the above information leads to the development of the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 7 (H7):
Social class is positively associated with consumer’s buying intention towards western food products.

2.8. Self-Concept

The congruence of brand personality and the consumer’s self is a way to create an emotional attachment to the brand and other various brand-related outcomes [64]. Additionally, various research studies have posited a significant relationship between this congruity and a positive brand attitude, positive brand perception, and the intention to buy [65]. Another study also supports the view that consumers prefer those products, which match (somehow) with their self-concept [66]. Self-concept has been identified as playing a mediating role concerning the underdog brand effect and the intention to buy [67]. The research of Hoonsopon [68] also found and used the self-concept as a moderating variable in the relationship between consumer innovativeness and new product purchase intentions. Hence, it concluded that even in new product adoption, consumers have a unique self-concept, and there is a chance the new product will be adopted when it fits with the self-concept of the consumer. Regardless of the rising research regarding self-concept and consumer behavior, there are still areas in the literature, which need further exploration. Earlier researchers have not taken into account the self-concept and its influence on consumer’s buying behavior for the food segment [65,68]. To fill this gap, this study expands on earlier research examining the role of the self-concept in consumer behavior by ascertaining its influence on buying behavior concerning western imported food. In the case of western imported food products, this self-concept is an important factor in the buyer’s purchase decision. This includes the consumer’s attitude and perception, and if both of these are positive towards the product, the consumer may end up finally deciding to purchase the product. Hence, the above information leads to the development of the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 8 (H8):
Self-concept is positively associated with consumer’s buying intentions towards western food products.

2.9. Brand Trust

In the case of food purchase behavior, self-assurance in credence features, and could lead to brand trust. A food-related research study conducted by Chen and Lee [69] reported that brand trust plays an important role. There is an important relationship amid various kinds of trust and consumers’ perceptions of safety concerning food items. The researchers specified two main types of trust: general and specific, specific trust further classified into supplier level, and industry-level trusts. Using the survey method in Beijing, results indicated an affirmative link amid consumer’s brand trust in food producers and retailers with their perceptions of food safety. When marketers aim to increase specific trust, they should address the integrity and ability of producers [70]. Drescher et al. [71] studied Canadian households’ perceptions of processed meat and their levels of trust. The research suggested customers with the highest level of brand trust spend more on processed meat than those with a low level. In the past literature, the importance of brand trust has highlighted along with its impact on creating highly valued relationships between consumers and firms. In this research, the element of brand trust has been added to determine the extent of consumers’ brand trust in western imported food and if this is influencing their purchase behavior. Brand trust is essential for making sure that the consumer makes the purchase. In the case of western imported food products, brand trust is essential for purchase behavior to take place. Once the consumer trusts the brand, he or she is willing to pay higher prices to procure the western imported food product. Henceforth, the above information leads to the development of the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 9 (H9):
Brand trust is positively associated with consumer’s buying intentions towards western food products.

2.10. Religiosity

The religious practices influence the imminence sited on attitudes and factual life towards possessing and consuming goods and services [72]. Religiosity, a central point of any religion, has a close association with consumer behavior. Thus, an exploration of religiosity allows in-depth investigation of consumer behavior [73]. Abundant literature is available regarding the association of religiosity and consumers’ behavior. For example, in a practical study regarding consumers’ intentions and religiosity amongst 602 typically Protestant customers. Rakrachakarn et al. [74] reported the noteworthy inference that religiosity influences numerous aspects of customers’ lifestyles that ultimately reshape the selection behavior. In Vitell’s [75] evaluation of religiosity and consumer behavior, one observation was prominent: that the number of academic studies has been inadequate in clarifying customers’ norms and religious views. This was associated with the arguments of Hannah, Avolio, and May [76] who specified that norms and capabilities of views accounted for 20% of the difference in the behavior explained. Henceforth, the above information leads to the development of the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 10 (H10):
Religiosity is positively associated with consumer’s buying intentions towards western food products.

2.11. Purchase Intention

Numerous factors influence purchase intention such as subjective norms, attitudes, and perceived behavioral control [77]. The consumers of imported food perceive these items as better quality compared to locally produced food brands and this positive attitude has affected their purchase intention [78]. Many previous studies further endorsed that factors such as subjective norms, health consciousness, and brand familiarity somehow influenced the purchase intention [76,78]. The results are consistent with several developed countries’ literature in which perceived value was quite important and had an impact on the food buying behavior and consumers were willing to pay extra to avail the maximum benefits [79]. A perception of better quality was also one of the key aspects of shaping consumers’ purchase intention. Those with a positive mindset concerning western food brands were likely to possess a positive intention to purchase it [80]. A positive attitude thus found to serve as an important stimulus and possibly influenced the consumers’ purchase intention. However, in most of the cases and especially in food buying behavior, it has been noted that purchase intention is a primary indicator and a leading factor towards a final purchase behavior [78,81]. Henceforth, the above information leads to the development of the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 11 (H11):
Purchase intention is positively associated with consumer’s buying behavior towards western food products.
Thus, the conceptual frame of the undertaken study is shown in Figure 1.

3. Materials and Methods

A structured questionnaire has tested the model established in this study. The primary survey conducted in the eight metropolitan cities of Pakistan, Karachi, Lahore, Islamabad, Peshawar, Hyderabad, Faisalabad, Quetta, and Larkana which together cover four regions (Sindh, Punjab, Baluchistan, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa). The main reason for selecting eight metropolitan cities of Pakistan was to ensure the sample represented the key Pakistani urban cities with diversified socio-economic classes and having the awareness and usage of western imported food, guaranteeing the generalizability of the research outcome [82]. The responses were collected online and in-person for the pilot study conducted in Karachi with a sample of 375 respondents. A pilot study has enhanced the precision of the survey instrument. A sample size of 375 deemed appropriate since there were 75 scale items and exploratory factor analysis requires a minimum of 5:1 ratio of respondents to items [83]. To run the factor analysis, a sample size smaller than 100 considered to be “dangerous”, and sample sizes larger than 200 are considered safe for adequate conclusions [84,85]. The final survey administered to 1080 respondents through in-person and online media such as email and social media. The sample size was calculated based on the ratio of 20 respondents per item, which is the prescribed ideal sample size needed to conduct SEM [85,86]. Before inputting the data, the questionnaires checked for any missing data. This initial screening revealed that out of 1080 surveys, 927 filled in. Hence, the response rate was 86 percent. Data normality observed by reviewing residual plots, which appeared to be reasonable, and the skewness and kurtosis values were near zero. Thus, the notion of normality undisrupted.

Measurement Scaling for Constructs and Items

The data is collected from 927 respondents for the undertaken study by using a structured and modified questionnaire. We used adapted measurement scales for constructs and items from the previous literature such as modified items of product attributes are taken from previous studies [38,39,40,41,42,43], modified items for marketing mix such as price and promotion have been taken from the previous literature [43,44,45,46]. However, the adapted items of lifestyle and personality are considered from the previous studies [51,52,53,54,55,56]. The subjective norms of the family items have been modified from previous studies such as Al-Swidi et al. [57] and Kautonen et al. [59]. The adapted items for the social class have been taken from previous studies such as Rani [61], Durmaz and Taşdemir [62], and Majabadi et al. [63]. The modified items of self-concept are taken from previous literature [64,65,66,67,68]. The items for brand trust have taken from previous studies such as Chen and Lee [69] and Drescher et al. [71]. Religiosity is the most important variable in this research, we have taken adapted items from the previous literature [72,73,74,75,76]. We used modified items for purchase intention and purchase behavior constructs from previous studies [77,78,79,80,81].

4. Results and Discussions

The survey forms distributed to 1080 respondents from eight cities of Pakistan, Karachi, Hyderabad, Larkana, Lahore, Islamabad, Faisalabad, Quetta, and Peshawar. A sample of 927 individuals consisting of professionals, university students, and homemakers responded to the survey, which presented a response rate of 86 percent. The main demographic variables included in this study are gender, religious identity, and age, level of education, monthly income, marital status, and employment status. Table 1 exhibits the frequencies and corresponding percentages of each demographic variable.
As Table 1 indicates, of the 927 respondents, 542 were male, and 385 were females. The age group of 18 to 24 was the largest, with over half of the respondents 58 percent. About 48 percent had a monthly income between PKR 40,001–64,000 (equivalent to US$310–497). Concerning academic qualifications, the majority had a postgraduate degree (57 percent). Most were single (71 percent), 42 percent were employed full time, and 42 percent resided in Karachi, followed by Lahore (with 30 percent).

4.1. Factor Loading and Path Analysis

The framework of this research tested in SPSS and AMOS 23.0 version. Analysis of a multi-stage SEM (structural equation modeling) process comprising of measurement and structural model conducted by path analysis [85,86]. Moreover, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) test has explored several factors for this study. Almost forty factors recognized with the commonalities greater than 0.5. Table 2 illustrates the results obtained through factor analysis. Furthermore, the sphericity and KMO tests recognized a significant relationship between the variables to authenticate the operationalization of factor analysis [86,87] as shown in Table 3 and Table 4.

4.2. Structural Model

The goodness of fit indices was fit for the model Chatfield [87] in Table 5.
The reported CMIN/DF (Chi-square (χ2)/df = 1.984 displays a good model fit since the value is less than 3, which is a statistical benchmark. The remaining fit indices also report that the model fits the research data. CFI, IFI, and TLI values are above the minimum threshold level 0.9 indicating a good model fit. AGFI and GFI values are as per the minimum threshold, which is 0.90. The RMSEA value is 0.033 which is <0.08 [88]. Besides, the ECVI indicates the smaller value, which presents that the model crosschecked by utilizing similar cases from the same target group. Lastly, the HOETLER figure of 527 at 0.01 level directed suitable sample suitability for the model; As per Hoelter [89], >200 would specify good sample appropriateness for the model. Hence, the figures deliver sufficient indication to support for a good model fit. Consequently, all the above-stated fit indices were acceptable well the above-suggested criteria.

4.3. Validity and Reliability

Reliabilities, factor loadings, and Average variance extracted (AVE) displayed in Table 6. Besides, the constructs’ validity comprises ‘convergent validity’ and ‘discriminant validity’, and Table 6 has all values equal and above the prescribed threshold of 0.72 to 0.9 [90]. The criterion for convergent and discriminant validity is as per the benchmark suggested by [91] and henceforth established convergent validity, as mentioned in Table 6.
The constructs stated in Table 7 fulfill the criterion of discriminant validity that is the square root of AVE > all possible squared correlations, as suggested by Hair et al. [85].

4.4. Outcomes of Hypothesized Relationships

Table 8 displays all relationships within independent, intervening, and dependent variables. The findings from the quantitative data analysis reveal that product attributes are positively associated with consumer purchase intentions for the sustenance of western imported food products, as exhibited in Table 8. It means that consumers give importance to product features at the time of purchase. The outcome of this hypothesis is also in line with the previous literature, for instance, Lian and Yoong [92] reported that product features such as taste, freshness, and packaging influenced consumers’ attitudes to purchasing food products. It was further endorsed by Wee et al. [79] who found that product safety related to food brands had a significant influence on consumers’ purchasing behavior of imported food products. Further research by Nasution and Rossanty [93] confirmed the long-established view that product labeling had an essential association with consumers’ attitudes to the purchasing behavior of food products.
The second association investigated was between price and consumer purchase intention for western imported food. The quantitative data results illustrate a positive association between western imported food prices and consumer purchase intention. The previous literature has suggested that imported food products had a higher rate compared to local food products [46]. The main reasons offered were that these products perceived to have better overall quality, with quality ingredients, a country of origin, and an established product name [94,95]. Hence, consumers are eager to pay more price for such food brands due to the perception of their superior value [96,97].
The next relationship investigated was between promotion and consumer purchase intention. Results from the quantitative findings indicate that promotion is not associated with consumer purchase intention, which differs from previous literature. Research conducted by Kazmi et al. [19] reported that product communication plays an imperative role in persuading consumers’ attitudes to a product and thus adds brand recall and awareness about the food brands. Effective communication through various channels such as magazines, newspapers, social media, and television thus enhances food brand awareness, sustenance in the market, and purchase intention, particularly among young consumers [97].
The results showed that the impact of lifestyle does not have any effect on consumer’s purchase intention, and showing no association between them. It suggests that Muslim consumer’s lifestyles indirectly connected with the purchase intention in the context of western imported food products in Pakistan. On the contrary, the findings from the past literature revealed that consumers’ health consciousness to food ingredients strongly motivate and influence consumers to engage in purchasing food brands manufactured outside the country. However, the overall quality and taste are also significant contributors to the purchase decision. Hence, elevating western imported food products [95].
The relationship between family and consumer purchase intention explored. Results indicated neither causal relationship nor any positive association between them. It contrasted with Tsang et al. [96] study which found a correlation between subjective norms and consumer food-buying behavior. Moreover, earlier research by Montano and Kasprzyk [36] endorsed the view that subjective criteria impact consumer food purchase behavior. The quantitative results of the current study of an absence of association can be due to different cultural and societal settings.
The construct of social class was also investigated, with no association found with the consumer buying intention for western imported food in Pakistan. This result differs from those of the literature. Durmaz and Taşdemir [62], for instance, reported that this factor had a substantial influence on customer buying behavior as this influence started throughout childhood, and the family shaped it. The researchers further stated that young people from the upper social class were more brands conscious and likely to seek information about the brand before making the final purchase decision as compared to their lower-class counterparts.
Brand trust was also investigated during the quantitative data analysis, indicating an affirmative corroboration between brand trust of organic food and consumer’s intention to purchase. In past research, the construct of brand trust widely discussed, and similar findings revealed. The study conducted by Flavián and Guinaliu [98] reported that the trust element linked with the brand image which reduces the consumers’ risk at the time of purchase. Therefore, a positive brand image leads to brand trust. Hence, the improved brand image of a company leads to positive and confident consumer behavior about that brand’s products related to food. Other research findings have reinforced a positive association between the brand image of a company and a consumer’s brand trust.
The construct of religiosity also tested and it discovered to have a positive association with the intentions of consumers’ buying regarding organic food, which aligned with the past literature. Mathras et al. [14] reported that halal consciousness and product elements have considerably influenced Muslims’ intention to purchase packaged food that is halal produced by Muslim or non-Muslim producers. Quantitative results confirm earlier research that in Muslim consumers, the religiosity behaves like an intervening factor within the different exogenous and endogenous variable [99]. Therefore, religious ethics perform integral in deciding consumer behavior. Religion guides Muslim consumers to take actions as per religious principles [15,22,23]. Thus, the quantitative analysis aligned with the previous literature wherein the connection of religiosity with consumer buying behavior well established.
Self-concept investigated, and results revealed it associated with the consumer purchase intention of western imported food, which aligns with the previous literature. Sirgy [100] reported that consumers preferred those products, which matched (somehow) with their self-concept. Self-concept identified as playing a mediating role concerning the brand effect and the intention to buy. Hoonsopon and Puriwat [101] also confirmed self-concept as a controlling variable for the innovative product purchase intentions.

4.5. Moderation Results

The moderation analysis aimed to establish if gender, income, and city moderate the relationship and impact among independent and mediation, leading to dependent variables. Firstly, gender, income, and city coded as dummy variables. A correlation analysis performed between the dependent variable and dummy coded variables from gender, income, and city to establish which variables might be potential moderators. The only significant correlation obtained between PB and the dummy variable of Income Group 3, i.e., with an income between PKR 64,001-150,000 (r = 0.065, p = 0.047). Therefore, the dummy variable of Income Group 3 shortlisted as a potential moderator variable. First, a regression model (Block 1) fitted to predict PB using PI (purchase intention) and the dummy variable of Income Group 3. The regression model found to be significant (r-square = 0.586). The model coefficients are shown in Table 9; both the main effects of PI and the dummy variable of Income Group 3 were found to be significant.
Next, the interaction between PI and the dummy variable of Income Group 3 added to the Block 1 model, this constituted the Block 2 model. The regression model was found to be significant (r-square = 0.586). The model coefficients shown in Table 10, after adding the interaction term, the main effect of PI was still substantial but the main impact of the dummy variable of Income Group 3 was not significant anymore. It indicates that the dummy variable of Income Group 3 moderates the relationship between PI and PB, but the main effect of PI is also substantial.

5. Conclusions

Pakistan, as a developing country, has shown growth in imported food consumption while experiencing economic growth and stability. Comprehending the Pakistani Muslim consumer means understanding that Pakistan is a Muslim dominated society with 97 percent of its population. This study has examined the consumer motives behind the purchase of western imported food products. Even though prices are on the higher side compared to local food products, western imported food is making inroads into Pakistani food purchasing behavior. The findings concluded that product attributes are positively associated with consumer purchase intentions for the sustenance of western imported food products. The second association demonstrated a positive association between western imported food prices and consumer purchase intention. The study also revealed that promotion is not associated with consumer purchase intention. The results showed that the impact of lifestyle does not have any impact on consumer’s purchase intention, and no association was found between them. It suggests that Muslim consumers’ lifestyles are indirectly connected with the purchase intention in the context of western imported food products in Pakistan. However, the overall quality and taste are also important contributors to the purchase decision. The relationship between family and consumer purchase intention indicated neither causal relationship nor any positive association between them. The construct of social class also investigated, with no association found with the consumer buying intention for western imported food in Pakistan. The researchers further concluded that young people from the upper social class were more brands conscious and likely to seek information about the brand before making the final purchase decision as compared to their lower-class counterparts. The brand trust concluded an affirmative corroboration between brand trust of organic food and consumer’s intention to purchase. Hence, the improved brand image of a company leads to positive and confident consumer behavior about that brand’s products related to food. The construct of religiosity concluded a positive association with the intentions of consumers’ buying regarding organic food. The study provides a holistic picture of cultural understanding, wherein religiosity was one of the central points of discussion to understand Pakistani Muslim consumers’ purchase intentions about western imported food. Thus, it provides a strong empirical contribution to research in the context of a Muslim population in the sub-continent by identifying the factors stated above. From a demographic perspective, this study developed a profile of consumers of western imported food. This overall information adds value to the literature on consumer behavior. This profile can serve as a learning paradigm for future researchers interested in working on consumers’ food purchasing patterns.

6. Practical Implications

The western world always seeks opportunities to export food products to emerging markets. With this strategic export vision, Asian consumer markets present great opportunities for many western food growers and businesses to explore [12]. Hence, this study may facilitate western food producers and exporters to understand Asian consumer behavior in particular western imported food products in Muslim Markets. They may then adjust their current marketing strategy, enabling them to export to such consumer markets. The outcome of this study brings in numerous opportunities for those western marketing practitioners interested in exploring and developing the Asian Muslim majority consumer market. Western food producers may differentiate their product offerings by emphasizing key attributes extracted from this study such as taste, quality, attractive packaging, and ingredients. Having a differentiated product may add a meaningful benefit which may enhance consumers’ quality perception or may decrease the perceived risk associated with the use of western imported food products. The enhancement in product attributes may develop brand trust and justification of premium price charged by these western food producers. Since this research is based on a Muslim majority population country, western producers must consider the element of religiosity at the time of developing their marketing strategy. Incorporating the halal logo or stamp, which displays halal product authentication, is highly important for western imported food producers as this builds trust among Muslim consumers to purchase and consume such food. The findings witnessed a positive association with purchase intention towards western food items. Thus, this validates the importance of religiosity and, in particular, the halal authentication is the most important factor for the prospective consumer.

7. Theoretical Contribution

The theory of planned behavior once again verified as a powerful model for testing consumer purchase intention by combining several factors on a single model [30]. New constructs added in TPB to enhance the explanatory power [32,34,35] in various domains. Thus, the present study has included marketing mix (product, price, and promotion); followed by consumer-related factors such as personality, social class, brand trust, and lifestyle; under the antecedents of attitude for family and friends; the antecedents of subjective norms such as self-concept and religiosity; and the antecedents of behavioral control. These tested concepts, for purchase intentions, are a strong contribution in this area of consumer behavior literature. The researchers have considered the above-stated factors as it plays an imperative role in food purchase intention. Therefore, understanding Muslim consumers’ perception of western imported food products is significant. The undertaken study also provided the existence of religiosity as a dimension of behavioral control. Adding in this way to the stated theory in the Muslim context where religiosity impacts purchasing and, in particular, food buying choices.

8. Limitations and Areas of Further Research

This research mainly restricted to the eight urban metropolitan cities of Pakistan, and this results in a lack of reliability and credibility of the study outcome. In future studies, researchers can work on the number of cities and make a comparison between cities by utilizing the factors addressed in this study. A cross-country comparison among the cities would be a new area of investigation for researchers and an opportunity for marketers to alter their food product categories accordingly. There is a lack of concentration on a specific food category. This study-addressed consumers’ motives behind the purchase of western imported food in general hence generalization to a specific food category is weak. Moving ahead, researchers can choose a specific category, for example, within fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG), a category of milk or any specific food item such as chocolates or biscuits explored. Within this category, a comparison study developed between the local and imported product categories. This research was limited to several consumer participants’ groups such as homemakers, university students, and professionals. Pakistan represents many ethnic cultures by adding more participant ethnic groups in the future with specific race/ethnicity, which may provide a better insightful representation of consumer perception in the respective buying behavior as well as facilitate more reliable comparisons.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.B. and S.H.; Methodology, R.R.A.; Software, R.H.S.; Validation, D.S., R.R.A., and Z.A.C.; Formal analysis, S.H.; Investigation, F.B.; Resources, D.S.; Data curation, R.H.S.; Writing—original draft preparation, F.B.; Writing—review and editing, Z.A.C.; Visualization, D.S.; Supervision, R.R.A.; Project administration, D.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of IQRA University that provided during this project including administrative and technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Forghani, M.H.; Kazemi, A.; Ranjbarian, B. Religion, peculiar beliefs and luxury cars’ consumer behavior in Iran. J. Islam. Mark. 2019, 10, 673–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Agarwala, R.; Mishra, P.; Singh, R. Religiosity and consumer behavior: A summarizing review. J. Manag. Spiritual. Relig. 2019, 16, 32–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Choi, Y.; Paulraj, A.; Shin, J. Religion or religiosity: Which is the culprit for consumer switching behavior? J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2013, 25, 262–280. [Google Scholar]
  4. Shukor, S.A.; Jamal, A. Developing scales for measuring religiosity in the context of consumer research. Middle-East. J. Sci. Res. 2013, 13, 69–74. [Google Scholar]
  5. Quoquab, F.; Pahlevan, J.; Ramayah, T.M. Factors affecting consumers’ intention to purchase a counterfeit product: An empirical study in the Malaysian market. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2017, 29, 837–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Swimberghe, K.; Flurry, L.A.; Parker, J.M. Consumer religiosity: Consequences for consumer activism in the United States. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 103, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Asri, N.M.; Aziz, A.A. Halal Dietary Supplement Products in Malaysia. In Management of Shari’ah Compliant Businesses; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 133–138. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hackett, C.; Lipka, M. The demographic factors that make Islam the world’s fastest-growing major religious group. (The Religious and Ethnic Future of Europe). Scr. Inst. Donneriani Abo. 2018, 28, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hackett, C.; Connor, P.; Stonawski, M.; Skirbekk, V. The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections, 2010–2050; Pew Research Center: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  10. Al Harethi, A.R.S. The Role of The Islamic Economy in Rationalizing Consumer Behavior. J. Islam. Bus. Econ. Rev. 2019, 2, 13–17. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zahid, M.M.; Ali, B.; Ahmad, M.S.; Thurasamy, R.; Amin, N. Factors Affecting Purchase Intention and Social Media Publicity of Green Products: The Mediating Role of Concern for Consequences. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2018, 25, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hayat, N.; Hussain, A.; Yousaf, H. Food demand in Pakistan: Analysis and projections. South Asia Econ. J. 2016, 17, 94–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ramli, A.M.; Mirza, A.A.I. The Theory of Consumer Behavior: Conventional vs Islamic. In Proceedings of the 2nd Islamic Conference (iECONS2007); Faculty of Economics and Muamalat, Islamic Science University of Malaysia: Nilai, Malaysia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mathras, D.; Cohen, A.; Mandel, N.; Mick, D.G. The effects of religion on consumer behavior: A conceptual framework and research agenda. J. Consum. Psychol. 2016, 26, 298–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khalek, A.A.; Sharifah, H.S.; Hairunnisa, M.I. A study on the factors influencing young Muslims’ behavioral intention in consuming halal food in Malaysia. J. Syariah 2015, 23, 79–102. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bornemann, T.; Schöler, L.; Homburg, C. In the eye of the beholder? The effect of product appearance on shareholder value. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2015, 32, 704–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chamhuri, N.; Batt, P.J. Consumer perceptions of food quality in Malaysia. Br. Food J. 2015, 117, 1168–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kazmi, S.A.Z.; Naarananoja, M.; Kytola, J. Harnessing new product development processes through strategic thinking initiatives. Int. J. Strateg. Decis. Sci. 2015, 6, 28–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kazmi, S.A.Z.; Naaranoja, M.; Kytola, J.; Kantola, J. Effective Corporate Communication: A Solution to Foster New Product Idea Generation Dynamics. In Advances in Human Factors, Business Management, Training, and Education; Springer: Cham, Gremany, 2017; pp. 1033–1045. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shah, S.A.M.; Amjad, S. Investigating moral ideology, ethical beliefs, and moral intensity among consumers of Pakistan. Asian J. Bus. Ethics 2017, 6, 153–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yousaf, S.; Malik, M.S. Evaluating the influences of religiosity and product involvement level on the consumers. J. Islam. Mark. 2013, 4, 163–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wan Ismail, W.R.; Othman, M.; Rahman, R.A.; Kamarulzaman, N.H.; Ab Rahman, S.B. “Is sharing really caring?” The impact of eWoM on halal tolerance among Malay Muslim consumers. J. Islam. Mark. 2019, 10, 394–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hosseini, S.M.P.; Mirzaei, M.; Iranmanesh, M. Determinants of Muslims’ willingness to pay for halal-certified food. J. Islam. Mark. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Souiden, N.; Jabeur, Y. The impact of Islamic beliefs on consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions of life insurance. Int. J. Bank Mark. 2015, 33, 423–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ali, S.; Ullah, H.; Akbar, M.; Akhtar, W.; Zahid, H. Determinants of Consumer Intentions to Purchase Energy-Saving Household Products in Pakistan. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Euro Monitor. Packaged Food in Australia 2018. 2018. Available online: https://www.euromonitor.com/packaged-food-in-australia/report (accessed on 20 September 2019).
  27. Khan, S.N.; Mohsin, M. The power of emotional value: Exploring the effects of values on green product consumer choice behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 150, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ali, S.; Danish, M.; Khuwaja, F.M.; Sajjad, M.S.; Zahid, H. The Intention to Adopt Green IT Products in Pakistan: Driven by the Modified Theory of
Consumption Values. Environments 2019, 6, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Donald, B.; Glasmeier, A.; Gray, M.; Lobao, L. Austerity in the City: Economic Crisis and Urban Service Decline? Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 2014, 7, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Armitage, C.J.; Conner, M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 2001, 40, 471–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Robinson, R.; Smith, C. Psychosocial and demographic variables associated with consumer intention to purchase sustainably produced foods as defined by the Midwest Food Alliance. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2002, 34, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Arvola, A.; Vassallo, M.; Dean, M.; Lampila, P.; Saba, A.; Lahteenmaki, L.; Shepherd, R. Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: The role of affective and moral attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Appetite 2008, 50, 443–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yadav, R.; Pathak, G.S. Young consumers’ intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 135, 732–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yadav, R.; Pathak, G.S. Determinants of consumers’ green purchase behavior in a developing nation: Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 134, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Montano, D.E.; Kasprzyk, D. Theory of Reasoned Action, Theory of Planned Behavior, and the Integrated Behavioral Model. Chapter 6 Health Behavior. In Theory, Research, and Practice Book, 5th ed.; Karen, G., Barbara, R., Viswanath, K., Eds.; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2015; pp. 95–124. [Google Scholar]
  37. Glock, C.; Stark, R. The New Denominationalism. Rev. Relig. Res. 1965, 7, 8–17. [Google Scholar]
  38. Shamsher, R. Relationship between Store Characteristics and Store Loyalty: An Explorative Study. Int. J. Econ. Empir. Res. 2014, 2, 431–442. [Google Scholar]
  39. Jamal, A.; Goode, M. Consumers, and brands: A study of the impact of self-image congruence on brand preference and satisfaction. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2001, 19, 482–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Torjusen, H.; Lieblein, G.; Wandel, M.; Francis, C.A. Food system orientation and quality perception among consumers and producers of organic food in Hedmark County, Norway. Food Qual. Prefer. 2001, 12, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dahm, M.J.; Samonte, A.V.; Shows, A.R. Organic foods: Do eco-friendly attitudes predict eco-friendly behaviors? J. Am. Coll. Health 2009, 58, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, Y.S.; Chang, C.H. Enhance green purchase intentions: The roles of green perceived value, green perceived risk, and green trust. Manag. Decis. 2012, 50, 502–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Knight, B.A. Towards Inclusion of Students with Special Educational Needs in the Regular Classroom. SfL-NASEN 1999, 14, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kotler, P.; Keller, K.L. Marketing Management Global, 14th ed.; Pearson Education Limited: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kotler, P. Marketing Management; Asia and North America Edition; Pearson Prentice Hall: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sharma, Y.; Nasreen, R.; Mishra, V. Impact of Consumer-Centric Marketing-Mix on Purchase Behavior of Non-Core Food Items: An Empirical Study of Urban Subsistence Marketplace. Asian J. Manag. Sci. 2017, 6, 28–41. [Google Scholar]
  47. Song, B.L.; Safari, M.; Mansori, S. The marketing stimuli factors influencing consumers’ attitudes to purchase organic food. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2016, 11, 109–119. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chryssochoidis, G.; Krystallis, A.; Perreas, P. Ethnocentric-beliefs and country-of-origin (COO) effect—Impact of country, product and product attributes on Greek consumers’ evaluation of food products. Eur. J. Mark. 2007, 41, 1518–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Banerjee, S. Influence of consumer personality, brand personality, and corporate personality on brand preference: An empirical investigation of the interaction effect. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2016, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chang, A.; Tseng, C.H.; Chu, M.Y. Value creation from a food traceability system based on a hierarchical model of consumer personality traits. Br. Food J. 2013, 115, 1361–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bolton, R.N.; Parasuraman, A.; Hoefnagels, A.; Kabadayi, S.; Gruber, T.; Loureiro, Y.K.; Solent, D. Understanding Generation Y and their use of Social Media: A Review and Research Agenda. J. Serv. Manag. 2013, 24, 245–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Goddard, A.; Morrow, D. Assessing the impact of motivational interviewing via co-active life coaching on engagement in physical activity. Int. J. Evid.-Based Coach. Mentor. 2015, 13, 101–121. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ahaiwe, E.; Onwumere, J.; Agodi, J. Analysis of determinants of Brand Preference for Cosmetics in Abia State, Nigeria. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2015, 3, 244–250. [Google Scholar]
  54. Qing, P.; Lobo, A.; Chongguang, L. The impact of lifestyle and ethnocentrism on consumers’ purchase intentions of fresh fruit in China. J. Consum. Mark. 2012, 29, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lassoued, R.; Hobbs, J. Consumer confidence in credence attributes: The role of brand trust. Food Policy 2015, 52, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Szakály, Z.; Szente, V.; Kövér, G.; Polereczki, Z.; Szigeti, O. The influence of lifestyle on health behavior and preference for functional foods. Appetite 2012, 58, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Al-Swidi, A.K.; Behjati, S.; Shahzad, A. Antecedents of Online Purchasing Intention among MBA Students: The Case of University Utara Malaysia Using the Partial Least Squares Approach. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2012, 7, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Yazdanpanah, M.; Forouzani, M. Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Predict Iranian Students’ Intention to Purchase Organic Food. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 107, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kautonen, T.; van Gelderen, M.W.; Fink, M. Behavior Robustness of the Theory of Planned in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2015, 39, 655–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Armstrong, E.A.; Hamilton, L.T.; Armstrong, E.M.; Seeley, J.L. “Good Girls”: Gender, Social Class, and Slut Discourse on Campus. Soc. Psychol. Q. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Rani, P. Factors influencing consumer behaviour. Int. J. Curr. Res. Acad. Rev. 2014, 2, 52–61. [Google Scholar]
  62. Durmaz, Y.; Taşdemir, A.A. Theoretical Approach to the Methods Introduction to International Markets. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2014, 5, 47–54. [Google Scholar]
  63. Majabadi, H.A.; Solhi, M.; Montazeri, A.; Shojaeizadeh, D.; Nejat, S.; Farahani, F.K.; Djazayeri, A. Factors Influencing Fast-Food Consumption Among Adolescents in Tehran: A Qualitative Study. Iran. Red Crescent Med. J. 2016, 18, e23890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Gonzalez-Jimenez, H. The self-concept life cycle and brand perceptions: An interdisciplinary perspective. AMS Rev. 2017, 7, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Sung, Y.; Choi, S.M. The influence of self-construal on self-brand congruity in the United States and Korea. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 2012, 43, 151–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lee, J. Universals and specifics of math self-concept, math self-efficacy, and math anxiety across 41 PISA 2003 participating countries. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2009, 19, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tuškej, U.; Golob, U.; Podnar, K. The role of consumer-brand identification in building brand relationships. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hoonsopon, D. The Moderating Effects of Self-Brand Concept and Reference Group on Consumer Innovativeness Toward Purchase Intention. In Marketing Challenges in a Turbulent Business Environment. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science; Groza, M., Ragland, C., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Gremany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  69. Chen, W.; Lee, K. Sharing, liking, commenting, and distressed? The pathway between Facebook interaction and psychological distress. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2013, 16, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Su, J.; Tong, X. Brand personality, consumer satisfaction, and loyalty: A perspective from denim jeans brands. Fam. Consum. Sci. Res. J. 2016, 44, 427–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Drescher, J.; Cohen-Kettenis, P.; Winter, S. Minding the body: Situating gender identity diagnoses in the ICD-11. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 2012, 24, 568–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Shaharudin, M.R.; Pani, J.J.; Mansor, S.W.; Elias, S.J. Purchase Intention of Organic Food in Kedah, Malaysia; A Religious Overview. Int. J. Mark. Stud. 2010, 2, 96–103. [Google Scholar]
  73. Chaudhry, S.; Razzaque, M.A. Religious Commitment and Muslim Consumers: A Model. to Study the Consumer Decision Making Process. In Proceedings of the 2010 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science; Deeter-Schmelz, D., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Gremany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  74. Rakrachakarn, V.; Moschis, G.P.; Ong, F.S.; Shannon, R. Materialism and life satisfaction: The role of religion. J. Relig. Health 2015, 54, 413–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Vitell, S.J. The role of religiosity in business and consumer ethics: A review of the literature. J. Bus. Ethics 2009, 90, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hannah, S.T.; Avolio, B.J.; May, D.R. Moral Maturation and Moral Conation: A Capacity Approach to Explaining Moral Thoughts and Action. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2011, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Vassallo, M.; Scalvedi, M.L.; Saba, A. Investigating psychosocial determinants in influencing sustainable food consumption in Italy. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2016, 40, 422–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Smith, S.; Paladino, A. Eating clean and green? Investigating consumer motivations towards the purchase of organic food. Australas. Mark. J. 2010, 18, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wee, C.S.; Ariff, M.S.B.M.; Zakuan, N.; Tajudin, M.N.M. Consumers perception, purchase intention and actual purchase behavior of organic food products. Rev. Integr. Bus. Econ. Res. 2014, 3, 378–397. [Google Scholar]
  80. Peter, J.P.; Olson, J.C. Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy, 8th ed.; McGraw-Hill, International Edition: Singapore, 2008; p. 400. [Google Scholar]
  81. Krystallis, A.; Fotopoulos, C.; Zotos, Y. Organic Consumers’ Profile and Their Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Selected Organic Food Products in Greece. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2006, 19, 81–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gobo, G. Upside down. Reinventing research design. Chapter 5. In Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection; Flick, U., Ed.; Sage: London, UK, 2018; pp. 65–83. [Google Scholar]
  83. Hair, J.; Risher, J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ahmed, R.R.; Streimikiene, D.; Berchtold, G.; Vveinhardt, J.; Channar, Z.A.; Soomro, R.H. Effectiveness of Online Digital Media Advertising as A Strategic Tool for Building Brand Sustainability: Evidence from FMCGs and Services Sectors of Pakistan. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Hair, J.F., Jr.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed.; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  86. Ahmed, R.R.; Vveinhardt, J.; Štreimikiene, D. The direct and indirect impact of Pharmaceutical industry in Economic expansion and Job creation: Evidence from Bootstrapping and Normal theory methods. Amfiteatru Econ. 2018, 20, 454–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Chatfield, C. Introduction to Multivariate Analysis; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  88. Hair, J.F., Jr.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  89. Hoelter, J.W. The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociol. Methods Res. 1983, 11, 325–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kline, T.J.B.; Sulsky, L.M.; Rever-Moriyama, S.D. Common method variance and specification errors: A practical approach to detection. J. Psychol. 2000, 134, 401–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 39, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lian, S.B.; Yoong, L.C. Assessing the Young Consumers’ Motives and Purchase Behavior for Organic Food: An Empirical Evidence from a Developing Nation. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2019, 9, 69–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Nasution, M.D.T.P.; Rossanty, Y. Country of origin as a moderator of a halal label and purchase behaviour. J. Bus. Retail Manag. Res. 2018, 12, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Tomić, M.; Alfnes, F. Effect of Normative and Affective Aspects on Willingness to Pay for Domestic Food Products—A Multiple Price List Experiment. J. Food Prod. Mark. 2018, 24, 681–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Nguyen, H.V.; Nguyen, N.; Nguyen, B.K.; Lobo, A.; Vu, P.A. Organic food purchases in an emerging market: The influence of consumers’ personal factors and green marketing practices of food stores. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Tsang, M.M.; Ho, S.C.; Lian, T.P. Consumer attitudes toward mobile advertising: an empirical study. Int. J. Elec. Com. 2004, 8, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Cui, L.; Jiang, H.; Deng, H.; Zhang, T. The influence of the diffusion of food safety information through social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: An empirical study in China. Data Technol. Appl. 2019, 53, 230–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Flavián, C.; Guinaliu, M.; Torres, E. The influence of corporate image on consumer trust: A comparative analysis in traditional versus internet banking. Internet Res. 2005, 15, 447–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Garg, P.; Joshi, R. Purchase intention of “Halal” brands in India: The mediating effect of attitude. J. Islam. Mark. 2018, 9, 683–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Sirgy, M.J. Self-congruity theory in consumer behavior: A little history. J. Glob. Sch. Mark. Sci. 2018, 28, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hoonsopon, D.; Puriwat, W. The effect of reference groups on purchase intention: Evidence in distinct types of shoppers and product involvement. Australas. Mark. J. 2016, 24, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conceptual framework.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework.
Sustainability 12 00356 g001
Table 1. Demographics.
Table 1. Demographics.
ItemCharacteristicNo. of RespondentsPercentage Response
GenderMale54258
Female38541
Age18–2454158
25–3531334
36–455505
46–551718
55+0301
Level of educationPrimary0201
Secondary or high school5405
Diploma/vocational education and training1111
Undergraduate (Bachelor)30833
Postgraduate (Masters)53057
PhD1902
Others0301
Per month income in Pak rupeesLess than 40,0001001
40,001–64,000 PKR44848
64,001–150,000 PKR32735
150,001–250,000 PKR8108
250,001+ PKR6107
Marital statusSingle65971
Married25627
Divorced0601
Others0601
Employment statusFull time39542
Part-time8108
Self employed5506
Unemployed39642
CityKarachi39342
Hyderabad4104
Larkana3704
Lahore28230
Islamabad3003
Quetta2302
Faisalabad7308
Peshawar4805
Table 2. Component matrix with rotations.
Table 2. Component matrix with rotations.
Component
123456789101112
Product attribute0.620
Product attribute0.712
Product attribute0.656
Price 0.504
Price 0.595
Price 0.500
Promotion 0.862
Promotion 0.912
Promotion 0.833
Promotion 0.616
Lifestyle 0.608
Lifestyle 0.889
Lifestyle 0.866
Personality 0.806
Personality 0.910
Personality 0.922
Personality 0.884
Family 0.828
Family 0.889
Family 0.866
Social-class 0.535
Social-class 0.706
Social-class 0.630
Social-class 0.529
Self-concept 0.747
Self-concept 0.891
Self-concept 0.760
Brand trust 0.705
Brand trust 0.782
Brand trust 0.701
Religiosity 0.845
Religiosity 0.798
Religiosity 0.648
Religiosity 0.592
PI 0.550
PI 0.774
PI 0.801
PB 0.738
PB 0.846
PB 0.773
Table 3. KMO analysis Bartlett’s sphericity test.
Table 3. KMO analysis Bartlett’s sphericity test.
KMO Measure of Sampling Adequacy0.905
Bartlett’s test of sphericityApprox. Chi-square20295.022
Df1035
Sig.0.000
Table 4. Total variances.
Table 4. Total variances.
ComponentEigenvalues
Total% of VarianceCumulative %
111.59421.4721.47
25.57310.31931.789
33.3896.27538.064
42.113.90841.972
51.8493.42445.396
61.7923.31948.716
71.6823.11551.83
81.4912.76154.592
91.3682.53457.126
101.1682.16359.289
111.0892.01761.306
121.0211.8963.196
Table 5. Overall model fit indices.
Table 5. Overall model fit indices.
IndicesReported ValueRecommended Value
Chi-square/DF ratio (CMIN/DF)1.984<3
GFI0.9320.90
AGFI0.9200.90
NFI0.9210.90
IFI0.9590.90
TLI0.9540.90
CFI0.9590.90
RMSEA0.033<0.08
ECVI1.759 (Default model)Default model should report the smallest value
1.771 (Saturated model)
18.964 (Independence model)
HOELTER527 at 0.01 level>200 at 0.01 level
Table 6. Validity and reliability measures.
Table 6. Validity and reliability measures.
ScalesVariableFactor LoadingAVEComposite ReliabilityCronbach’s ɑ
Product attributeProduct attribute0.6810.5550.7880.711
Product attribute0.807
Product attribute0.741
PricePrice0.7040.5000.7490.715
Price0.664
Price0.751
PromotionPromotion0.7940.6890.8980.834
Promotion0.802
Promotion0.844
Promotion0.879
LifestyleLifestyle0.9270.7500.9000.784
Lifestyle0.839
Lifestyle0.828
PersonalityPersonality0.7940.6790.8940.897
Personality0.841
Personality0.843
Personality0.817
FamilyFamily0.8020.5000.8550.786
Family0.793
Family0.847
Social classSocial class0.7020.5840.8490.840
Social class0.693
Social class0.744
Social class0.692
Self-conceptSelf-concept0.7110.5150.7610.737
Self-concept0.722
Self-concept0.720
Brand trust Brand trust0.7720.6200.8300.870
Brand trust0.752
Brand trust0.836
ReligiosityReligiosity0.5910.5520.7370.731
Religiosity0.618
Religiosity0.738
Religiosity0.616
PIPurchase intention0.7050.5000.7230.766
PI0.687
PI0.655
PBPurchase behavior0.8310.6310.8370.825
PB0.720
PB0.831
Table 7. Measurement model discriminant validity measures.
Table 7. Measurement model discriminant validity measures.
ComponentPAPRCPROMOPERLIFEFAMSCSELFBTRELPIPB
Product attribute0.745
Price0.4420.707
Promotion0.2180.2200.830
Personality0.0760.2360.3030.866
Lifestyle0.2400.1340.1710.0540.824
Family0.1820.2000.3480.4220.0980.707
Social class0.0940.2060.3480.6610.0580.5010.764
Self-concept0.3950.2920.1250.0950.2820.0990.1420.718
Brand trust0.5000.4030.1290.1990.2060.1730.2130.4170.787
Religiosity0.135−0.0290.163−0.0550.2700.125−0.0380.099−0.0070.743
Purchase intention0.4960.4530.1920.2050.3100.2290.2320.4240.5640.0840.707
Purchase behavior0.4710.4270.1640.1790.2910.1900.1950.3870.5680.1020.7040.794
Table 8. Standardized regression weights and p-values.
Table 8. Standardized regression weights and p-values.
Hypothesis Estimatesp-Value
Ha1SupportedProduct attribute -> PI0.217<0.001 ***
Ha2SupportedPrice -> PI0.204<0.001 ***
Ha3Not SupportedPromotion -> PI0.0120.704
Ha4SupportedPersonality -> PI0.1080.001 ***
Ha5Not SupportedLifestyle -> PI−0.0180.745
Ha6Not SupportedFamily -> PI−0.0150.699
Ha7Not SupportedSocial class -> PI0.0970.127
Ha8SupportedSelf-concept -> PI0.0660.091 *
Ha9SupportedBrand trust -> PI0.466<0.001 ***
Ha10SupportedReligiosity -> PI0.135<0.001 ***
Ha11SupportedPI-> purchase behavior0.91<0.001 ***
Note: PI = Purchase intention; * Significant at 10% (p < 0.1); *** Significant at 1% (p < 0.01).
Table 9. Block 1 regression model.
Table 9. Block 1 regression model.
ModelBStd. ErrorTSig.
(Constant)0.8070.07510.775<0.001
PI0.7720.02136.072<0.001
Dummy variable indicating that INCOME = 3.0 (“64,001–150,000”).0.0790.0352.2570.024
Table 10. Block 2 regression model.
Table 10. Block 2 regression model.
Model tSig.
(Constant)0.8129.615<0.001
PI0.77131.772<0.001
Dummy variable indicating that INCOME = 3.0 (“64,001–150,000”)0.0580.3180.751
PI_×_Income_30.0060.1210.903

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bukhari, F.; Hussain, S.; Ahmed, R.R.; Streimikiene, D.; Soomro, R.H.; Channar, Z.A. Motives and Role of Religiosity towards Consumer Purchase Behavior in Western Imported Food Products. Sustainability 2020, 12, 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010356

AMA Style

Bukhari F, Hussain S, Ahmed RR, Streimikiene D, Soomro RH, Channar ZA. Motives and Role of Religiosity towards Consumer Purchase Behavior in Western Imported Food Products. Sustainability. 2020; 12(1):356. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010356

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bukhari, Faheem, Saima Hussain, Rizwan Raheem Ahmed, Dalia Streimikiene, Riaz Hussain Soomro, and Zahid Ali Channar. 2020. "Motives and Role of Religiosity towards Consumer Purchase Behavior in Western Imported Food Products" Sustainability 12, no. 1: 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010356

APA Style

Bukhari, F., Hussain, S., Ahmed, R. R., Streimikiene, D., Soomro, R. H., & Channar, Z. A. (2020). Motives and Role of Religiosity towards Consumer Purchase Behavior in Western Imported Food Products. Sustainability, 12(1), 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010356

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop