Motives and Role of Religiosity towards Consumer Purchase Behavior in Western Imported Food Products
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- To investigate factors affecting Muslim consumer’s purchase behavior in western imported food products in Pakistan.
- To identify the relationships that exist between each of these factors and western imported food products purchase behavior.
- To determine the moderation of demographic profile on a relationship between contributory factors and consumer’s purchase behavior.
Integration of Theory of Planned Behavior
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses Development
2.1. Product Attributes
2.2. Price
2.3. Promotion
2.4. Personality
2.5. Lifestyle
2.6. Family (Subjective Norms)
2.7. Social Class
2.8. Self-Concept
2.9. Brand Trust
2.10. Religiosity
2.11. Purchase Intention
3. Materials and Methods
Measurement Scaling for Constructs and Items
4. Results and Discussions
4.1. Factor Loading and Path Analysis
4.2. Structural Model
4.3. Validity and Reliability
4.4. Outcomes of Hypothesized Relationships
4.5. Moderation Results
5. Conclusions
6. Practical Implications
7. Theoretical Contribution
8. Limitations and Areas of Further Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Forghani, M.H.; Kazemi, A.; Ranjbarian, B. Religion, peculiar beliefs and luxury cars’ consumer behavior in Iran. J. Islam. Mark. 2019, 10, 673–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarwala, R.; Mishra, P.; Singh, R. Religiosity and consumer behavior: A summarizing review. J. Manag. Spiritual. Relig. 2019, 16, 32–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, Y.; Paulraj, A.; Shin, J. Religion or religiosity: Which is the culprit for consumer switching behavior? J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2013, 25, 262–280. [Google Scholar]
- Shukor, S.A.; Jamal, A. Developing scales for measuring religiosity in the context of consumer research. Middle-East. J. Sci. Res. 2013, 13, 69–74. [Google Scholar]
- Quoquab, F.; Pahlevan, J.; Ramayah, T.M. Factors affecting consumers’ intention to purchase a counterfeit product: An empirical study in the Malaysian market. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2017, 29, 837–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swimberghe, K.; Flurry, L.A.; Parker, J.M. Consumer religiosity: Consequences for consumer activism in the United States. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 103, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asri, N.M.; Aziz, A.A. Halal Dietary Supplement Products in Malaysia. In Management of Shari’ah Compliant Businesses; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 133–138. [Google Scholar]
- Hackett, C.; Lipka, M. The demographic factors that make Islam the world’s fastest-growing major religious group. (The Religious and Ethnic Future of Europe). Scr. Inst. Donneriani Abo. 2018, 28, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hackett, C.; Connor, P.; Stonawski, M.; Skirbekk, V. The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections, 2010–2050; Pew Research Center: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Al Harethi, A.R.S. The Role of The Islamic Economy in Rationalizing Consumer Behavior. J. Islam. Bus. Econ. Rev. 2019, 2, 13–17. [Google Scholar]
- Zahid, M.M.; Ali, B.; Ahmad, M.S.; Thurasamy, R.; Amin, N. Factors Affecting Purchase Intention and Social Media Publicity of Green Products: The Mediating Role of Concern for Consequences. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2018, 25, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayat, N.; Hussain, A.; Yousaf, H. Food demand in Pakistan: Analysis and projections. South Asia Econ. J. 2016, 17, 94–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramli, A.M.; Mirza, A.A.I. The Theory of Consumer Behavior: Conventional vs Islamic. In Proceedings of the 2nd Islamic Conference (iECONS2007); Faculty of Economics and Muamalat, Islamic Science University of Malaysia: Nilai, Malaysia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Mathras, D.; Cohen, A.; Mandel, N.; Mick, D.G. The effects of religion on consumer behavior: A conceptual framework and research agenda. J. Consum. Psychol. 2016, 26, 298–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalek, A.A.; Sharifah, H.S.; Hairunnisa, M.I. A study on the factors influencing young Muslims’ behavioral intention in consuming halal food in Malaysia. J. Syariah 2015, 23, 79–102. [Google Scholar]
- Bornemann, T.; Schöler, L.; Homburg, C. In the eye of the beholder? The effect of product appearance on shareholder value. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2015, 32, 704–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chamhuri, N.; Batt, P.J. Consumer perceptions of food quality in Malaysia. Br. Food J. 2015, 117, 1168–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kazmi, S.A.Z.; Naarananoja, M.; Kytola, J. Harnessing new product development processes through strategic thinking initiatives. Int. J. Strateg. Decis. Sci. 2015, 6, 28–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazmi, S.A.Z.; Naaranoja, M.; Kytola, J.; Kantola, J. Effective Corporate Communication: A Solution to Foster New Product Idea Generation Dynamics. In Advances in Human Factors, Business Management, Training, and Education; Springer: Cham, Gremany, 2017; pp. 1033–1045. [Google Scholar]
- Shah, S.A.M.; Amjad, S. Investigating moral ideology, ethical beliefs, and moral intensity among consumers of Pakistan. Asian J. Bus. Ethics 2017, 6, 153–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousaf, S.; Malik, M.S. Evaluating the influences of religiosity and product involvement level on the consumers. J. Islam. Mark. 2013, 4, 163–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan Ismail, W.R.; Othman, M.; Rahman, R.A.; Kamarulzaman, N.H.; Ab Rahman, S.B. “Is sharing really caring?” The impact of eWoM on halal tolerance among Malay Muslim consumers. J. Islam. Mark. 2019, 10, 394–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini, S.M.P.; Mirzaei, M.; Iranmanesh, M. Determinants of Muslims’ willingness to pay for halal-certified food. J. Islam. Mark. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souiden, N.; Jabeur, Y. The impact of Islamic beliefs on consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions of life insurance. Int. J. Bank Mark. 2015, 33, 423–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, S.; Ullah, H.; Akbar, M.; Akhtar, W.; Zahid, H. Determinants of Consumer Intentions to Purchase Energy-Saving Household Products in Pakistan. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Euro Monitor. Packaged Food in Australia 2018. 2018. Available online: https://www.euromonitor.com/packaged-food-in-australia/report (accessed on 20 September 2019).
- Khan, S.N.; Mohsin, M. The power of emotional value: Exploring the effects of values on green product consumer choice behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 150, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, S.; Danish, M.; Khuwaja, F.M.; Sajjad, M.S.; Zahid, H. The Intention to Adopt Green IT Products in Pakistan: Driven by the Modified Theory of Consumption Values. Environments 2019, 6, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Donald, B.; Glasmeier, A.; Gray, M.; Lobao, L. Austerity in the City: Economic Crisis and Urban Service Decline? Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 2014, 7, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armitage, C.J.; Conner, M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 2001, 40, 471–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Robinson, R.; Smith, C. Psychosocial and demographic variables associated with consumer intention to purchase sustainably produced foods as defined by the Midwest Food Alliance. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2002, 34, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arvola, A.; Vassallo, M.; Dean, M.; Lampila, P.; Saba, A.; Lahteenmaki, L.; Shepherd, R. Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: The role of affective and moral attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Appetite 2008, 50, 443–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, R.; Pathak, G.S. Young consumers’ intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 135, 732–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, R.; Pathak, G.S. Determinants of consumers’ green purchase behavior in a developing nation: Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 134, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montano, D.E.; Kasprzyk, D. Theory of Reasoned Action, Theory of Planned Behavior, and the Integrated Behavioral Model. Chapter 6 Health Behavior. In Theory, Research, and Practice Book, 5th ed.; Karen, G., Barbara, R., Viswanath, K., Eds.; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2015; pp. 95–124. [Google Scholar]
- Glock, C.; Stark, R. The New Denominationalism. Rev. Relig. Res. 1965, 7, 8–17. [Google Scholar]
- Shamsher, R. Relationship between Store Characteristics and Store Loyalty: An Explorative Study. Int. J. Econ. Empir. Res. 2014, 2, 431–442. [Google Scholar]
- Jamal, A.; Goode, M. Consumers, and brands: A study of the impact of self-image congruence on brand preference and satisfaction. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2001, 19, 482–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torjusen, H.; Lieblein, G.; Wandel, M.; Francis, C.A. Food system orientation and quality perception among consumers and producers of organic food in Hedmark County, Norway. Food Qual. Prefer. 2001, 12, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahm, M.J.; Samonte, A.V.; Shows, A.R. Organic foods: Do eco-friendly attitudes predict eco-friendly behaviors? J. Am. Coll. Health 2009, 58, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.S.; Chang, C.H. Enhance green purchase intentions: The roles of green perceived value, green perceived risk, and green trust. Manag. Decis. 2012, 50, 502–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knight, B.A. Towards Inclusion of Students with Special Educational Needs in the Regular Classroom. SfL-NASEN 1999, 14, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotler, P.; Keller, K.L. Marketing Management Global, 14th ed.; Pearson Education Limited: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Kotler, P. Marketing Management; Asia and North America Edition; Pearson Prentice Hall: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, Y.; Nasreen, R.; Mishra, V. Impact of Consumer-Centric Marketing-Mix on Purchase Behavior of Non-Core Food Items: An Empirical Study of Urban Subsistence Marketplace. Asian J. Manag. Sci. 2017, 6, 28–41. [Google Scholar]
- Song, B.L.; Safari, M.; Mansori, S. The marketing stimuli factors influencing consumers’ attitudes to purchase organic food. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2016, 11, 109–119. [Google Scholar]
- Chryssochoidis, G.; Krystallis, A.; Perreas, P. Ethnocentric-beliefs and country-of-origin (COO) effect—Impact of country, product and product attributes on Greek consumers’ evaluation of food products. Eur. J. Mark. 2007, 41, 1518–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Banerjee, S. Influence of consumer personality, brand personality, and corporate personality on brand preference: An empirical investigation of the interaction effect. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2016, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, A.; Tseng, C.H.; Chu, M.Y. Value creation from a food traceability system based on a hierarchical model of consumer personality traits. Br. Food J. 2013, 115, 1361–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolton, R.N.; Parasuraman, A.; Hoefnagels, A.; Kabadayi, S.; Gruber, T.; Loureiro, Y.K.; Solent, D. Understanding Generation Y and their use of Social Media: A Review and Research Agenda. J. Serv. Manag. 2013, 24, 245–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Goddard, A.; Morrow, D. Assessing the impact of motivational interviewing via co-active life coaching on engagement in physical activity. Int. J. Evid.-Based Coach. Mentor. 2015, 13, 101–121. [Google Scholar]
- Ahaiwe, E.; Onwumere, J.; Agodi, J. Analysis of determinants of Brand Preference for Cosmetics in Abia State, Nigeria. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2015, 3, 244–250. [Google Scholar]
- Qing, P.; Lobo, A.; Chongguang, L. The impact of lifestyle and ethnocentrism on consumers’ purchase intentions of fresh fruit in China. J. Consum. Mark. 2012, 29, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lassoued, R.; Hobbs, J. Consumer confidence in credence attributes: The role of brand trust. Food Policy 2015, 52, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szakály, Z.; Szente, V.; Kövér, G.; Polereczki, Z.; Szigeti, O. The influence of lifestyle on health behavior and preference for functional foods. Appetite 2012, 58, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Swidi, A.K.; Behjati, S.; Shahzad, A. Antecedents of Online Purchasing Intention among MBA Students: The Case of University Utara Malaysia Using the Partial Least Squares Approach. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2012, 7, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yazdanpanah, M.; Forouzani, M. Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Predict Iranian Students’ Intention to Purchase Organic Food. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 107, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kautonen, T.; van Gelderen, M.W.; Fink, M. Behavior Robustness of the Theory of Planned in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2015, 39, 655–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Armstrong, E.A.; Hamilton, L.T.; Armstrong, E.M.; Seeley, J.L. “Good Girls”: Gender, Social Class, and Slut Discourse on Campus. Soc. Psychol. Q. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rani, P. Factors influencing consumer behaviour. Int. J. Curr. Res. Acad. Rev. 2014, 2, 52–61. [Google Scholar]
- Durmaz, Y.; Taşdemir, A.A. Theoretical Approach to the Methods Introduction to International Markets. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2014, 5, 47–54. [Google Scholar]
- Majabadi, H.A.; Solhi, M.; Montazeri, A.; Shojaeizadeh, D.; Nejat, S.; Farahani, F.K.; Djazayeri, A. Factors Influencing Fast-Food Consumption Among Adolescents in Tehran: A Qualitative Study. Iran. Red Crescent Med. J. 2016, 18, e23890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gonzalez-Jimenez, H. The self-concept life cycle and brand perceptions: An interdisciplinary perspective. AMS Rev. 2017, 7, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sung, Y.; Choi, S.M. The influence of self-construal on self-brand congruity in the United States and Korea. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 2012, 43, 151–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J. Universals and specifics of math self-concept, math self-efficacy, and math anxiety across 41 PISA 2003 participating countries. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2009, 19, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuškej, U.; Golob, U.; Podnar, K. The role of consumer-brand identification in building brand relationships. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoonsopon, D. The Moderating Effects of Self-Brand Concept and Reference Group on Consumer Innovativeness Toward Purchase Intention. In Marketing Challenges in a Turbulent Business Environment. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science; Groza, M., Ragland, C., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Gremany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, W.; Lee, K. Sharing, liking, commenting, and distressed? The pathway between Facebook interaction and psychological distress. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2013, 16, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, J.; Tong, X. Brand personality, consumer satisfaction, and loyalty: A perspective from denim jeans brands. Fam. Consum. Sci. Res. J. 2016, 44, 427–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Drescher, J.; Cohen-Kettenis, P.; Winter, S. Minding the body: Situating gender identity diagnoses in the ICD-11. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 2012, 24, 568–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaharudin, M.R.; Pani, J.J.; Mansor, S.W.; Elias, S.J. Purchase Intention of Organic Food in Kedah, Malaysia; A Religious Overview. Int. J. Mark. Stud. 2010, 2, 96–103. [Google Scholar]
- Chaudhry, S.; Razzaque, M.A. Religious Commitment and Muslim Consumers: A Model. to Study the Consumer Decision Making Process. In Proceedings of the 2010 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science; Deeter-Schmelz, D., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Gremany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Rakrachakarn, V.; Moschis, G.P.; Ong, F.S.; Shannon, R. Materialism and life satisfaction: The role of religion. J. Relig. Health 2015, 54, 413–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vitell, S.J. The role of religiosity in business and consumer ethics: A review of the literature. J. Bus. Ethics 2009, 90, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hannah, S.T.; Avolio, B.J.; May, D.R. Moral Maturation and Moral Conation: A Capacity Approach to Explaining Moral Thoughts and Action. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2011, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vassallo, M.; Scalvedi, M.L.; Saba, A. Investigating psychosocial determinants in influencing sustainable food consumption in Italy. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2016, 40, 422–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, S.; Paladino, A. Eating clean and green? Investigating consumer motivations towards the purchase of organic food. Australas. Mark. J. 2010, 18, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wee, C.S.; Ariff, M.S.B.M.; Zakuan, N.; Tajudin, M.N.M. Consumers perception, purchase intention and actual purchase behavior of organic food products. Rev. Integr. Bus. Econ. Res. 2014, 3, 378–397. [Google Scholar]
- Peter, J.P.; Olson, J.C. Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy, 8th ed.; McGraw-Hill, International Edition: Singapore, 2008; p. 400. [Google Scholar]
- Krystallis, A.; Fotopoulos, C.; Zotos, Y. Organic Consumers’ Profile and Their Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Selected Organic Food Products in Greece. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2006, 19, 81–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gobo, G. Upside down. Reinventing research design. Chapter 5. In Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection; Flick, U., Ed.; Sage: London, UK, 2018; pp. 65–83. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.; Risher, J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, R.R.; Streimikiene, D.; Berchtold, G.; Vveinhardt, J.; Channar, Z.A.; Soomro, R.H. Effectiveness of Online Digital Media Advertising as A Strategic Tool for Building Brand Sustainability: Evidence from FMCGs and Services Sectors of Pakistan. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed.; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, R.R.; Vveinhardt, J.; Štreimikiene, D. The direct and indirect impact of Pharmaceutical industry in Economic expansion and Job creation: Evidence from Bootstrapping and Normal theory methods. Amfiteatru Econ. 2018, 20, 454–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatfield, C. Introduction to Multivariate Analysis; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Hoelter, J.W. The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociol. Methods Res. 1983, 11, 325–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kline, T.J.B.; Sulsky, L.M.; Rever-Moriyama, S.D. Common method variance and specification errors: A practical approach to detection. J. Psychol. 2000, 134, 401–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 39, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lian, S.B.; Yoong, L.C. Assessing the Young Consumers’ Motives and Purchase Behavior for Organic Food: An Empirical Evidence from a Developing Nation. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2019, 9, 69–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasution, M.D.T.P.; Rossanty, Y. Country of origin as a moderator of a halal label and purchase behaviour. J. Bus. Retail Manag. Res. 2018, 12, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tomić, M.; Alfnes, F. Effect of Normative and Affective Aspects on Willingness to Pay for Domestic Food Products—A Multiple Price List Experiment. J. Food Prod. Mark. 2018, 24, 681–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.V.; Nguyen, N.; Nguyen, B.K.; Lobo, A.; Vu, P.A. Organic food purchases in an emerging market: The influence of consumers’ personal factors and green marketing practices of food stores. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tsang, M.M.; Ho, S.C.; Lian, T.P. Consumer attitudes toward mobile advertising: an empirical study. Int. J. Elec. Com. 2004, 8, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, L.; Jiang, H.; Deng, H.; Zhang, T. The influence of the diffusion of food safety information through social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: An empirical study in China. Data Technol. Appl. 2019, 53, 230–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flavián, C.; Guinaliu, M.; Torres, E. The influence of corporate image on consumer trust: A comparative analysis in traditional versus internet banking. Internet Res. 2005, 15, 447–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, P.; Joshi, R. Purchase intention of “Halal” brands in India: The mediating effect of attitude. J. Islam. Mark. 2018, 9, 683–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirgy, M.J. Self-congruity theory in consumer behavior: A little history. J. Glob. Sch. Mark. Sci. 2018, 28, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoonsopon, D.; Puriwat, W. The effect of reference groups on purchase intention: Evidence in distinct types of shoppers and product involvement. Australas. Mark. J. 2016, 24, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Item | Characteristic | No. of Respondents | Percentage Response |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 542 | 58 |
Female | 385 | 41 | |
Age | 18–24 | 541 | 58 |
25–35 | 313 | 34 | |
36–45 | 55 | 05 | |
46–55 | 17 | 18 | |
55+ | 03 | 01 | |
Level of education | Primary | 02 | 01 |
Secondary or high school | 54 | 05 | |
Diploma/vocational education and training | 11 | 11 | |
Undergraduate (Bachelor) | 308 | 33 | |
Postgraduate (Masters) | 530 | 57 | |
PhD | 19 | 02 | |
Others | 03 | 01 | |
Per month income in Pak rupees | Less than 40,000 | 10 | 01 |
40,001–64,000 PKR | 448 | 48 | |
64,001–150,000 PKR | 327 | 35 | |
150,001–250,000 PKR | 81 | 08 | |
250,001+ PKR | 61 | 07 | |
Marital status | Single | 659 | 71 |
Married | 256 | 27 | |
Divorced | 06 | 01 | |
Others | 06 | 01 | |
Employment status | Full time | 395 | 42 |
Part-time | 81 | 08 | |
Self employed | 55 | 06 | |
Unemployed | 396 | 42 | |
City | Karachi | 393 | 42 |
Hyderabad | 41 | 04 | |
Larkana | 37 | 04 | |
Lahore | 282 | 30 | |
Islamabad | 30 | 03 | |
Quetta | 23 | 02 | |
Faisalabad | 73 | 08 | |
Peshawar | 48 | 05 |
Component | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
Product attribute | 0.620 | |||||||||||
Product attribute | 0.712 | |||||||||||
Product attribute | 0.656 | |||||||||||
Price | 0.504 | |||||||||||
Price | 0.595 | |||||||||||
Price | 0.500 | |||||||||||
Promotion | 0.862 | |||||||||||
Promotion | 0.912 | |||||||||||
Promotion | 0.833 | |||||||||||
Promotion | 0.616 | |||||||||||
Lifestyle | 0.608 | |||||||||||
Lifestyle | 0.889 | |||||||||||
Lifestyle | 0.866 | |||||||||||
Personality | 0.806 | |||||||||||
Personality | 0.910 | |||||||||||
Personality | 0.922 | |||||||||||
Personality | 0.884 | |||||||||||
Family | 0.828 | |||||||||||
Family | 0.889 | |||||||||||
Family | 0.866 | |||||||||||
Social-class | 0.535 | |||||||||||
Social-class | 0.706 | |||||||||||
Social-class | 0.630 | |||||||||||
Social-class | 0.529 | |||||||||||
Self-concept | 0.747 | |||||||||||
Self-concept | 0.891 | |||||||||||
Self-concept | 0.760 | |||||||||||
Brand trust | 0.705 | |||||||||||
Brand trust | 0.782 | |||||||||||
Brand trust | 0.701 | |||||||||||
Religiosity | 0.845 | |||||||||||
Religiosity | 0.798 | |||||||||||
Religiosity | 0.648 | |||||||||||
Religiosity | 0.592 | |||||||||||
PI | 0.550 | |||||||||||
PI | 0.774 | |||||||||||
PI | 0.801 | |||||||||||
PB | 0.738 | |||||||||||
PB | 0.846 | |||||||||||
PB | 0.773 |
KMO Measure of Sampling Adequacy | 0.905 | |
---|---|---|
Bartlett’s test of sphericity | Approx. Chi-square | 20295.022 |
Df | 1035 | |
Sig. | 0.000 |
Component | Eigenvalues | ||
---|---|---|---|
Total | % of Variance | Cumulative % | |
1 | 11.594 | 21.47 | 21.47 |
2 | 5.573 | 10.319 | 31.789 |
3 | 3.389 | 6.275 | 38.064 |
4 | 2.11 | 3.908 | 41.972 |
5 | 1.849 | 3.424 | 45.396 |
6 | 1.792 | 3.319 | 48.716 |
7 | 1.682 | 3.115 | 51.83 |
8 | 1.491 | 2.761 | 54.592 |
9 | 1.368 | 2.534 | 57.126 |
10 | 1.168 | 2.163 | 59.289 |
11 | 1.089 | 2.017 | 61.306 |
12 | 1.021 | 1.89 | 63.196 |
Indices | Reported Value | Recommended Value |
---|---|---|
Chi-square/DF ratio (CMIN/DF) | 1.984 | <3 |
GFI | 0.932 | 0.90 |
AGFI | 0.920 | 0.90 |
NFI | 0.921 | 0.90 |
IFI | 0.959 | 0.90 |
TLI | 0.954 | 0.90 |
CFI | 0.959 | 0.90 |
RMSEA | 0.033 | <0.08 |
ECVI | 1.759 (Default model) | Default model should report the smallest value |
1.771 (Saturated model) | ||
18.964 (Independence model) | ||
HOELTER | 527 at 0.01 level | >200 at 0.01 level |
Scales | Variable | Factor Loading | AVE | Composite Reliability | Cronbach’s ɑ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product attribute | Product attribute | 0.681 | 0.555 | 0.788 | 0.711 |
Product attribute | 0.807 | ||||
Product attribute | 0.741 | ||||
Price | Price | 0.704 | 0.500 | 0.749 | 0.715 |
Price | 0.664 | ||||
Price | 0.751 | ||||
Promotion | Promotion | 0.794 | 0.689 | 0.898 | 0.834 |
Promotion | 0.802 | ||||
Promotion | 0.844 | ||||
Promotion | 0.879 | ||||
Lifestyle | Lifestyle | 0.927 | 0.750 | 0.900 | 0.784 |
Lifestyle | 0.839 | ||||
Lifestyle | 0.828 | ||||
Personality | Personality | 0.794 | 0.679 | 0.894 | 0.897 |
Personality | 0.841 | ||||
Personality | 0.843 | ||||
Personality | 0.817 | ||||
Family | Family | 0.802 | 0.500 | 0.855 | 0.786 |
Family | 0.793 | ||||
Family | 0.847 | ||||
Social class | Social class | 0.702 | 0.584 | 0.849 | 0.840 |
Social class | 0.693 | ||||
Social class | 0.744 | ||||
Social class | 0.692 | ||||
Self-concept | Self-concept | 0.711 | 0.515 | 0.761 | 0.737 |
Self-concept | 0.722 | ||||
Self-concept | 0.720 | ||||
Brand trust | Brand trust | 0.772 | 0.620 | 0.830 | 0.870 |
Brand trust | 0.752 | ||||
Brand trust | 0.836 | ||||
Religiosity | Religiosity | 0.591 | 0.552 | 0.737 | 0.731 |
Religiosity | 0.618 | ||||
Religiosity | 0.738 | ||||
Religiosity | 0.616 | ||||
PI | Purchase intention | 0.705 | 0.500 | 0.723 | 0.766 |
PI | 0.687 | ||||
PI | 0.655 | ||||
PB | Purchase behavior | 0.831 | 0.631 | 0.837 | 0.825 |
PB | 0.720 | ||||
PB | 0.831 |
Component | PA | PRC | PROMO | PER | LIFE | FAM | SC | SELF | BT | REL | PI | PB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product attribute | 0.745 | |||||||||||
Price | 0.442 | 0.707 | ||||||||||
Promotion | 0.218 | 0.220 | 0.830 | |||||||||
Personality | 0.076 | 0.236 | 0.303 | 0.866 | ||||||||
Lifestyle | 0.240 | 0.134 | 0.171 | 0.054 | 0.824 | |||||||
Family | 0.182 | 0.200 | 0.348 | 0.422 | 0.098 | 0.707 | ||||||
Social class | 0.094 | 0.206 | 0.348 | 0.661 | 0.058 | 0.501 | 0.764 | |||||
Self-concept | 0.395 | 0.292 | 0.125 | 0.095 | 0.282 | 0.099 | 0.142 | 0.718 | ||||
Brand trust | 0.500 | 0.403 | 0.129 | 0.199 | 0.206 | 0.173 | 0.213 | 0.417 | 0.787 | |||
Religiosity | 0.135 | −0.029 | 0.163 | −0.055 | 0.270 | 0.125 | −0.038 | 0.099 | −0.007 | 0.743 | ||
Purchase intention | 0.496 | 0.453 | 0.192 | 0.205 | 0.310 | 0.229 | 0.232 | 0.424 | 0.564 | 0.084 | 0.707 | |
Purchase behavior | 0.471 | 0.427 | 0.164 | 0.179 | 0.291 | 0.190 | 0.195 | 0.387 | 0.568 | 0.102 | 0.704 | 0.794 |
Hypothesis | Estimates | p-Value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Ha1 | Supported | Product attribute -> PI | 0.217 | <0.001 *** |
Ha2 | Supported | Price -> PI | 0.204 | <0.001 *** |
Ha3 | Not Supported | Promotion -> PI | 0.012 | 0.704 |
Ha4 | Supported | Personality -> PI | 0.108 | 0.001 *** |
Ha5 | Not Supported | Lifestyle -> PI | −0.018 | 0.745 |
Ha6 | Not Supported | Family -> PI | −0.015 | 0.699 |
Ha7 | Not Supported | Social class -> PI | 0.097 | 0.127 |
Ha8 | Supported | Self-concept -> PI | 0.066 | 0.091 * |
Ha9 | Supported | Brand trust -> PI | 0.466 | <0.001 *** |
Ha10 | Supported | Religiosity -> PI | 0.135 | <0.001 *** |
Ha11 | Supported | PI-> purchase behavior | 0.91 | <0.001 *** |
Model | B | Std. Error | T | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|
(Constant) | 0.807 | 0.075 | 10.775 | <0.001 |
PI | 0.772 | 0.021 | 36.072 | <0.001 |
Dummy variable indicating that INCOME = 3.0 (“64,001–150,000”). | 0.079 | 0.035 | 2.257 | 0.024 |
Model | t | Sig. | |
---|---|---|---|
(Constant) | 0.812 | 9.615 | <0.001 |
PI | 0.771 | 31.772 | <0.001 |
Dummy variable indicating that INCOME = 3.0 (“64,001–150,000”) | 0.058 | 0.318 | 0.751 |
PI_×_Income_3 | 0.006 | 0.121 | 0.903 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bukhari, F.; Hussain, S.; Ahmed, R.R.; Streimikiene, D.; Soomro, R.H.; Channar, Z.A. Motives and Role of Religiosity towards Consumer Purchase Behavior in Western Imported Food Products. Sustainability 2020, 12, 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010356
Bukhari F, Hussain S, Ahmed RR, Streimikiene D, Soomro RH, Channar ZA. Motives and Role of Religiosity towards Consumer Purchase Behavior in Western Imported Food Products. Sustainability. 2020; 12(1):356. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010356
Chicago/Turabian StyleBukhari, Faheem, Saima Hussain, Rizwan Raheem Ahmed, Dalia Streimikiene, Riaz Hussain Soomro, and Zahid Ali Channar. 2020. "Motives and Role of Religiosity towards Consumer Purchase Behavior in Western Imported Food Products" Sustainability 12, no. 1: 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010356
APA StyleBukhari, F., Hussain, S., Ahmed, R. R., Streimikiene, D., Soomro, R. H., & Channar, Z. A. (2020). Motives and Role of Religiosity towards Consumer Purchase Behavior in Western Imported Food Products. Sustainability, 12(1), 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010356