Influence of Business Commitment to Sustainability, Perceived Value Fit, and Gender in Job Seekers’ Pursuit Intentions: A Cross-Country Moderated Mediation Analysis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework
2.1. The Human Resource Function and Business Sustainability
2.2. Hypotheses Development
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Data
3.2. Design
3.3. Measures
4. Analysis and Results
4.1. Study 1: Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Moderated Mediation Analysis
4.1.1. Reliability and Validity: Confirmatory Factor Analysis
4.1.2. Testing of Hypothesis: Moderated Mediation Analysis
4.2. Study 2. Hierarchical Regression Analysis: Cross-Country Perspective of the Individual Effects of Business Commitment to Sustainability
4.3. Results Summary
5. Discussion
6. Limitations and Future Research Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Huber, R.; Hirsch, B. Behavioral Effects of Sustainability-Oriented Incentive Systems. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2017, 26, 163–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turban, D.B.; Greening, D.W. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Acad. Manag. J. 1997, 40, 658–672. [Google Scholar]
- Lis, B. The relevance of corporate social responsibility for a sustainable human resource management: An analysis of organizational attractiveness as a determinant in employees’ selection of a (potential) employer. Manag. Rev. 2012, 123, 279–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tirabeni, L.; De Bernardi, P.; Forliano, C.; Franco, M. How can organisations and business models lead to a more sustainable society? A framework from a systematic review of the industry 4.0. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jones, D.A.; Willness, C.R.; Madey, S. Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Acad. Manag. J. 2014, 57, 383–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carballo-Penela, A. Enhancing social sustainability at a business level: Organizational attractiveness is higher when organizations show responsibility towards employees. Bus. Strategy Dev. 2019, 2, 372–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saifulina, N. Understanding the Drivers of Employee’s Voluntary Pro-Environmental Behavior at Work: An Analysis of Organizational and Individual Factors in the Banking Sector; Universidade de Santiago de Compostela: Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Greening, D.W.; Turban, D.B. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Bus. Soc. 2000, 39, 254–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Highhouse, S.; Lievens, F.; Sinar, E.F. Measuring attraction to organizations. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 2003, 63, 986–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aiman-Smith, L.; Bauer, T.N.; Cable, D.M. Are you attracted? Do you intend to pursue? A recruiting policy-capturing study. J. Bus. Psychol. 2001, 16, 219–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gully, S.M.; Phillips, J.M.; Castellano, W.G.; Han, K.; Kim, A. A Mediated Moderation Model of Recruiting Socially and Environmentally Responsible Job Applicants. Pers. Psychol. 2013, 66, 935–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rynes, S.L.; Lawler, J. A policy-capturing investigation of the role of expectancies in decisions to pursue job alternatives. J. Appl. Psychol. 1983, 68, 620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rupp, D.E.; Shao, R.; Thornton, M.A.; Skarlicki, D.P. Applicants’ and employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: The moderating effects of first-party justice perceptions and moral identity. Pers. Psychol. 2013, 66, 895–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobbs, R.; Lund, S.; Madgavkar, A. Talent tensions ahead: A CEO briefing. McKinsey Q. 2012, 4, 92–102. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, D.A.; Willness, C.R.; Heller, K.W. Illuminating the signals job seekers receive from an employer’s community involvement and environmental sustainability practices: Insights into why most job seekers are attracted, others are indifferent, and a few are repelled. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Jones, D.A.; Rupp, D.E. Social responsibility in and of organizations: The psychology of corporate social responsibility among organizational members. In Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology, 2nd ed.; Andersons, N., Ones, D.S., Sinangil, H.K., Viswesvaran, C., Eds.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Casper, W.J.; Buffardi, L.C. Work-life benefits and job pursuit intentions: The role of anticipated organizational support. J. Vocat. Behav. 2004, 65, 391–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Gowan, M.A. Corporate social responsibility, applicants’ individual traits, and organizational attraction: A person–organization fit perspective. J. Bus. Psychol. 2012, 27, 345–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avery, D.R.; Volpone, S.D.; Stewart, R.W.; Luksyte, A.; Hernandez, M.; McKay, P.F.; Hebl, M.M.R. Examining the draw of diversity: How diversity climate perceptions affect job-pursuit intentions. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2013, 52, 175–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, D.A.; Newman, A.; Shao, R.; Cooke, F.L. Advances in Employee-Focused Micro-Level Research on Corporate Social Responsibility: Situating New Contributions within the Current State of the Literature. J. Bus. Ethics 2018, 157, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fagerlind, T.; Stefanicki, M.; Feldmann, A.; Korhonen, J. The Distribution of Sustainable Decision-Making in Multinational Manufacturing Enterprises. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rodríguez-Sánchez, J.-L.; González-Torres, T.; Montero-Navarro, A.; Gallego-Losada, R. Investing Time and Resources for Work–Life Balance: The Effect on Talent Retention. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rodrigues, L.C.A.; Coelho, F.J.; Sousa, C.M.P. Control mechanisms and goal orientations: Evidence from frontline service employees. Eur. J. Mark. 2015, 49, 350–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sousa, C.M.P.; Coelho, F.; Guillamon-Saorin, E. Personal Values, Autonomy, and Self-efficacy: Evidence from frontline service employees. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 2012, 20, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huselid, M.A. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Acad. Manag. J. 1995, 38, 635–672. [Google Scholar]
- Lepak, D.P.; Liao, H.; Chung, Y.; Harden, E.E. A conceptual review of human resource management systems in strategic human resource management research. Res. Pers. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2006, 25, 217–271. [Google Scholar]
- Jackson, S.E.; Schuler, R.S.; Jiang, K. An aspirational framework for strategic human resource management. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2014, 8, 1–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wright, P.M.; Gardner, T.M.; Moynihan, L.M.; Allen, M.R. The relationship between HR practices and firm performance: Examining causal order. Pers. Psychol. 2005, 58, 409–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez-Sánchez, J.-L.; Mora-Valentín, E.-M.; Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M. Human resource management in merger and acquisition planning. J. Organ. Chang. Manag. 2019, 33, 16–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, S.E.; Renwick, D.W.S.; Jabbour, C.J.C.; Muller-Camen, M. State-of-the-art and future directions for green human resource management: Introduction to the special issue. Ger. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2011, 25, 99–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ehnert, I.; Harry, W.; Zink, K.J. Sustainability and Human Resource Management: Developing Sustainable Business Organizations; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Spence, M. Job market signaling. In Uncertainty in Economics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1978; pp. 281–306. [Google Scholar]
- Breaugh, J.A.; Starke, M. Research on employee recruitment: So many studies, so many remaining questions. J. Manag. 2000, 26, 405–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rynes, S.L.; Bretz, R.D., Jr.; Gerhart, B. The importance of recruitment in job choice: A different way of looking. Pers. Psychol. 1991, 44, 487–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Breaugh, J.A. Employee recruitment: Current knowledge and important areas for future research. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2008, 18, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behrend, T.S.; Baker, B.A.; Thompson, L.F. Effects of pro-environmental recruiting messages: The role of organizational reputation. J. Bus. Psychol. 2009, 24, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kristof, A.L. Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Pers. Psychol. 1996, 49, 1–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, B. The people make the place. Pers. Psychol. 1987, 40, 437–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatman, J.A. Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1989, 14, 333–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hoffman, B.J.; Woehr, D.J. A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. J. Vocat. Behav. 2006, 68, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Judge, T.A.; Cable, D.M. Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organization attraction. Pers. Psychol. 1997, 50, 359–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Setó-Pamies, D. The relationship between women directors and corporate social responsibility. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2015, 22, 334–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eagly, A.H.; Carli, L.L. Finding gender advantage and disadvantage: Systematic research integration is the solution. Leadersh. Q. 2003, 14, 851–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mesmer-Magnus, J.R.; Viswesvaran, C. How family-friendly work environments affect work/family conflict: A meta-analytic examination. J. Labor Res. 2006, 27, 555–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, S.; Huse, M. The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 2010, 18, 136–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brundtland, G.H.; Environment, W.C.N. Development. In Our Common Future; Oxford University Press Oxford: Oxford, UK, 1987; Volume 383. [Google Scholar]
- Park, S.; Choi, S.; Kim, E. The relationships between socio-demographic variables and concerns about environmental sustainability. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2012, 19, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wehrmeyer, W.; McNeil, M. Activists, pragmatists, technophiles and tree-huggers? Gender differences in employees’ environmental attitudes. J. Bus. Ethics 2000, 28, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preacher, K.J.; Rucker, D.D.; Hayes, A.F. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar. Behav. Res. 2007, 42, 185–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofstede, G.; Bond, M.H. Hofstede’s culture dimensions: An independent validation using Rokeach’s value survey. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 1984, 15, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofstede, G. Geert Hofstede Cultural Dimensions. 2009. Available online: http://www.geert-hofstede.com/hofstede_mexico.shtml (accessed on 8 February 2007).
- Mukazhanova, K. A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Leadership Choices: Commonalities and Differences among Female Leaders in the United States, Kazakhstan and Sweden; University of Oregon: Eugene, OR, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, J.; Jiuhua Zhu, C. Effects of socially responsible human resource management on employee organizational commitment. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2011, 22, 3020–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cable, D.M.; Judge, T.A. Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1996, 67, 294–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hayes, A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Gerbing, D.W.; Anderson, J.C. An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment. J. Mark. Res. 1988, 25, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vandenberg, R.J.; Lance, C.E. A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research. Organ. Res. Methods 2000, 3, 4–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988, 16, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, J.C.; Gerbing, D.W. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychol. Bull. 1988, 103, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kenny, D.A.; Kashy, D.A.; Bolger, N. Data analysis in social psychology. Handb. Soc. Psychol. 1998, 1, 233–265. [Google Scholar]
- Dawson, J.F. Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. J. Bus. Psychol. 2014, 29, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gross-Gołacka, E.; Kusterka-Jefmańska, M.; Jefmański, B. Can Elements of Intellectual Capital Improve Business Sustainability?—The Perspective of Managers of SMEs in Poland. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- US News. Best Country Report. Available online: https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/overall-rankings (accessed on 13 March 2020).
- Martins, L.L.; Parsons, C.K. Effects of gender diversity management on perceptions of organizational attractiveness: The role of individual differences in attitudes and beliefs. J. Appl. Psychol. 2007, 92, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mauno, S.; Kinnunen, U.; Feldt, T. Work-family culture and job satisfaction: Does gender and parenting status alter the relationship? Community Work Fam. 2012, 15, 101–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, C. Doing what comes naturally? Women and environment in development. World Dev. 1993, 21, 1947–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerci, M.; Radaelli, G.; Siletti, E.; Cirella, S.; Shani, A.B.R. The impact of human resource management practices and corporate sustainability on organizational ethical climates: An employee perspective. J. Bus. Ethics 2015, 126, 325–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wayne, J.H.; Casper, W.J. Why does firm reputation in human resource policies influence college students? The mechanisms underlying job pursuit intentions. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2012, 51, 121–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
SFL | |
---|---|
P-V FIT (CR = 0.884; AVE = 0.793; CA = 0.881) | |
My values “match” or fit in this organization | 0.910 |
My values match those of current employees in organization | 0.870 |
JPI (CR = 0.866; AVE = 0.617; CA = 0.863) | |
I would accept a job offer from this company | 0.771 |
I would make this company one of my first choices as an employer | 0.837 |
I would exert a great deal of effort to work for this company | 0.798 |
I would recommend this company to a friend looking for a job | 0.733 |
MODEL FIT SUMMARY | |
Chi-square = 27.893, df = 12 (CMIN/DF = 2.324) CFI = 0.984; IFI = 0.984; TLI = 0.972 RMSEA = 0.071 |
CONSTRUCT | 1 | 2 | 3 |
---|---|---|---|
1. SUSTAIN | 1.000 | ||
2. P-V FIT | 0.410 | 0.890 | |
3. JPI | 0.495 | 0.782 | 0.786 |
Model 1. JPI | Model 2. P-V FIT | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VARIABLES | β | SE | p | LLCI | ULCI | β | SE | p | LLCI | ULCI |
CONSTANT | 1.894 **** | 0.144 | 0.000 | 1.612 | 2.177 | 3.068 **** | 0.088 | 0.000 | 2.895 | 3.242 |
SUSTAIN | 0.282 **** | 0.055 | 0.000 | 0.174 | 0.390 | 0.498 **** | 0.073 | 0.000 | 0.354 | 0.643 |
P-V FIT | 0.544 **** | 0.043 | 0.000 | 0.460 | 0.628 | - | - | - | - | - |
GENDER | −0.211 ns | 0.180 | 0.243 | −0.566 | 0.144 | |||||
SUSTAIN x GENDER | −0.282 * | 0.149 | 0.059 | −0.575 | 0.012 | |||||
MODEL SUMMARY | R2 | F | p | R2 | F | p | ||||
0.518 | 140.63 | 0.000 | 0.163 | 16.92 | 0.000 |
Moderator (Gender) | Effect | SE | p | LLCI | ULCI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 (MALE) | 0.669 **** | 0.115 | 0.000 | 0.443 | 0.894 |
1 (FEMALE) | 0.387 **** | 0.095 | 0.000 | 0.199 | 0.574 |
TEST OF UNCONDITIONAL INTERACTION | Δ R2 | F | p | ||
INTERACTION | 0.012 | 3.578 | 0.059 |
Moderator (Gender) | Effect | BSE | LLCI | ULCI |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 (MALE) | 0.364 * | 0.057 | 0.252 | 0.481 |
1 (FEMALE) | 0.210 * | 0.058 | 0.100 | 0.325 |
INDEX OF MODERATED MEDIATION | Index | BSE | BLLCI | BULCI |
P-V FIT (MEDIATOR) | −0.153 * | 0.078 | −0.311 | −0.003 |
Sample | Total (n = 265) | Spain (n = 121) | Kazakhstan (n = 113) | Germany (n = 31) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MODEL: STEP 1 | β | SE | β | SE | β | SE | β | SE |
CONSTANT | 6.197 **** | 0.734 | 4.547 *** | 1.422 | 6.879 **** | 1.428 | 3.717 * | 2.023 |
AGE | −0.125 **** | 0.035 | −0.060 ns | 0.065 | −0.146 ** | 0.064 | −0.043 ns | 0.090 |
EXPER | 0.008 * | 0.004 | 0.019 * | 0.010 | 0.012 ns | 0.008 | 0.002 ns | 0.007 |
SUMMARY | R2 | F | R2 | F | R2 | F | R2 | F |
0.049 **** | 6.757 | 0.030 ns | 1.850 | 0.046 * | 2.645 | 0.011 ns | 0.149 | |
MODEL: STEP 2 | β | SE | β | SE | β | SE | β | SE |
CONSTANT | 3.930 **** | 0.683 | 2.800 ** | 1.126 | 4.555 **** | 1.173 | 2.594 ns | 2.028 |
AGE | −0.092 *** | 0.031 | −0.065 ns | 0.050 | −0.091 ns | 0.056 | −0.058 ns | 0.085 |
EXPER | 0.004 ns | 0.004 | 0.016 ** | 0.008 | 0.012 * | 0.007 | −0.001 ns | 0.007 |
CEWE | 1.081 **** | 0.152 | 1.314 **** | 0.204 | 1.281 **** | 0.224 | −0.181 ns | 0.491 |
CFE | 0.300 ** | 0.149 | 0.136 ns | 0.191 | 0.243 ns | 0.216 | 0.624 ns | 0.459 |
ISW | 0.569 **** | 0.149 | 0.642 **** | 0.190 | 0.459 ** | 0.217 | 0.634 ns | 0.498 |
WLB | 0.435 *** | 0.150 | 0.884 **** | 0.193 | −0.098 ns | 0.216 | 0.775 ns | 0.456 |
WAM | 0.331 ** | 0.149 | 0.449 ** | 0.188 | −0.053 ns | 0.217 | 0.880 * | 0.467 |
HS | 0.620 **** | 0.149 | 0.841 **** | 0.190 | 0.540 ** | 0.217 | 0.388 ns | 0.493 |
SUMMARY | R2 | F | R2 | F | R2 | F | R2 | F |
0.304 **** | 13.999 | 0.474 **** | 12.657 | 0.327 **** | 6.304 | 0.367 ns | 1.598 | |
Δ R2 | Δ F | Δ R2 | Δ F | Δ R2 | Δ F | Δ R2 | Δ F | |
0.255 **** | 15.657 | 0.444 **** | 15.743 | 0.281 **** | 7.225 | 0.357 * | 2.069 |
Proposed Hypothesis | Result |
---|---|
Hypothesis 1: SUSTAIN → JPI | SUPPORTED |
Hypothesis 2: SUSTAIN → P-V FIT → JPI | SUPPORTED |
Hypothesis 3: SUSTAIN (x GENDER) → P-V FIT | NOT SUPPORTED |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Carballo-Penela, A.; Ruzo-Sanmartín, E.; Sousa, C.M.P. Influence of Business Commitment to Sustainability, Perceived Value Fit, and Gender in Job Seekers’ Pursuit Intentions: A Cross-Country Moderated Mediation Analysis. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4395. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114395
Carballo-Penela A, Ruzo-Sanmartín E, Sousa CMP. Influence of Business Commitment to Sustainability, Perceived Value Fit, and Gender in Job Seekers’ Pursuit Intentions: A Cross-Country Moderated Mediation Analysis. Sustainability. 2020; 12(11):4395. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114395
Chicago/Turabian StyleCarballo-Penela, Adolfo, Emilio Ruzo-Sanmartín, and Carlos M. P. Sousa. 2020. "Influence of Business Commitment to Sustainability, Perceived Value Fit, and Gender in Job Seekers’ Pursuit Intentions: A Cross-Country Moderated Mediation Analysis" Sustainability 12, no. 11: 4395. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114395
APA StyleCarballo-Penela, A., Ruzo-Sanmartín, E., & Sousa, C. M. P. (2020). Influence of Business Commitment to Sustainability, Perceived Value Fit, and Gender in Job Seekers’ Pursuit Intentions: A Cross-Country Moderated Mediation Analysis. Sustainability, 12(11), 4395. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114395