Practical Analysis of BIM Tasks for Modular Construction Projects in South Korea
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
- Sample size is small. What statistical method is used for sampling? How is it determined that 22 is enough?
- Using mean and especially standard deviation is not correct with ordinal data.
- Inclusiveness and exclusiveness of tasks and activities could be elaborated.
- The logic of BIM UI should be explained.
- Possibly some non-parametric tests could be used to highlight the important results (e.g. in Table 5)
Author Response
We are very grateful for your opinions. I have faithfully reflected your opinions in the manuscript. Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
- the relation the authors want to start between BIM and the modular construction is weak. cause BIM is a methodology that helps improve the different phases of any project. so the tools exist and any tools could be applied without being assigned to a specific construction method such as the modular method
- the list could be expanded or even shrank according to top the BIM manger and the job description
- I would rather prefer as a BIM user to know what template /software more involved in this methodology
Author Response
We are very grateful for your opinions. I have faithfully reflected your opinions in the manuscript. Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
The paper is well-structured and written.
My minor revisions are:
- line 196. The references Lee and Sheeare are cited in the text in a wrong way according to journal template.
- Literature review section should be placed as main heading before the others sub-sections
- Result and Discussion should be listed in the manuscript as separate heading sections
Author Response
We are very grateful for your opinions. I have faithfully reflected your opinions in the manuscript. Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
I believe further revision, especially in the methodology section, can improve the paper.
Author Response
We have supplemented the methodology according to your opinion. First, for a clear description of the methodology, " 2. Research methodology" was newly distinguished, and supplementary explanations for the procedure and Figure 2 were added. Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf