Analysis of Vehicle Breakdown Frequency: A Case Study of New South Wales, Australia
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Study Area and Data Description
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Description
3. Methodology
4. Results
5. Discussion
5.1. Temporal Variables
5.2. Exposure Variables
5.3. Socioeconomic Variables
5.4. Heavy Vehicles
5.5. Weather Variables
5.6. Holidays and Other Variables
5.7. Insignificant and Correlated Variables Not Considered in the Final Model
6. Suggestions to Reduce Breakdowns
7. Conclusions and Future Work
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Nair, D.J.; Gilles, F.; Chand, S.; Saxena, N.; Dixit, V. Characterizing multicity urban traffic conditions using crowdsourced data. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0212845. [Google Scholar]
- Skabardonis, A.; Varaiya, P.; Petty, K.F. Measuring Recurrent and Nonrecurrent Traffic Congestion. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2003, 1856, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, X.; Ding, C.; Luan, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. Prioritizing Influential Factors for Freeway Incident Clearance Time Prediction Using the Gradient Boosting Decision Trees Method. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2017, 18, 2303–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neudorff, L.G.; Randall, J.; Reiss, R.A.; Gordon, R.L. Freeway Management and Operations Handbook; United States Federal Highway Administration, Office of Transportation: Washington, DC, USA, 2003.
- Yin, Y.; Lam, W.H.; Ieda, H. New technology and the modeling of risk-taking behavior in congested road networks. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2004, 12, 171–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, Y.; Ieda, H. Assessing Performance Reliability of Road Networks Under Nonrecurrent Congestion. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2001, 1771, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Palma, A.; Rochat, D. Understanding individual travel decisions: Results from a commuters survey in Geneva. Transportation 1999, 26, 263–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chand, S.; Aouad, G.; Dixit, V.V. Long-Range Dependence of Traffic Flow and Speed of a Motorway: Dynamics and Correlation with Historical Incidents. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2017, 2616, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, H.; van Lint, H.; van Zuylen, H. The effects of traffic accidents on travel time reliability. In Proceedings of the 2008 11th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Beijing, China, 12–15 October 2008; pp. 79–84. [Google Scholar]
- Park, H.; Haghani, A.; Samuel, S.; Knodler, M.A. Real-time prediction and avoidance of secondary crashes under unexpected traffic congestion. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2018, 112, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, H.; Haghani, A. Real-time prediction of secondary incident occurrences using vehicle probe data. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2016, 70, 69–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranney, T.A. Driver Distraction: A Review of the Current State-of-Knowledge; National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA): Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
- Khattak, A.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H. Incident management integration tool: Dynamically predicting incident durations, secondary incident occurrence and incident delays. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 2012, 6, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afrin, T.; Yodo, N. A Survey of Road Traffic Congestion Measures towards a Sustainable and Resilient Transportation System. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Black, W.R. Sustainable Transportation: Problems and Solutions; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Haque, M.; Chin, H.C.; Debnath, A.K. Sustainable, safe, smart—three key elements of Singapore’s evolving transport policies. Transp. Policy 2013, 27, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mannering, F.L.; Bhat, C.R. Analytic methods in accident research: Methodological frontier and future directions. Anal. Methods Accid. Res. 2014, 1, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pande, A.; Chand, S.; Saxena, N.; Dixit, V.; Loy, J.; Wolshon, B.; Kent, J.D. A preliminary investigation of the relationships between historical crash and naturalistic driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2017, 101, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chand, S.; Dixit, V.V. Application of Fractal theory for crash rate prediction: Insights from random parameters and latent class tobit models. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2018, 112, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milton, J.C.; Shankar, V.N.; Mannering, F.L. Highway accident severities and the mixed logit model: An exploratory empirical analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2008, 40, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Kaabi, A.; Dissanayake, D.; Bird, R. Response Time of Highway Traffic Accidents in Abu Dhabi. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2012, 2278, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, L.; Bao, X.; Wu, H.; Wu, W. A Study on Correlation of Traffic Accident Tendency with Driver Characters Using In-Depth Traffic Accident Data. J. Adv. Transp. 2020, 2020, 9084245. Available online: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jat/2020/9084245/ (accessed on 1 October 2020). [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Toshniwal, D. A data mining approach to characterize road accident locations. J. Mod. Transp. 2016, 24, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, X.; Lord, D.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, Y. Predicting motor vehicle crashes using Support Vector Machine models. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2008, 40, 1611–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munyazikwiye, B.B.; Karimi, H.R.; Robbersmyr, K.G. Fuzzy logic approach to predict vehicle crash severity from acceleration data. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Fuzzy Theory and Its Applications (iFUZZY), Yilan, Taiwan, 18–20 November 2015; pp. 44–49. [Google Scholar]
- Delen, D.; Sharda, R.; Bessonov, M. Identifying significant predictors of injury severity in traffic accidents using a series of artificial neural networks. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2006, 38, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Comi, A.; Persia, L.; Nuzzolo, A.; Polimeni, A. Exploring temporal and spatial structure of urban road accidents: Some empirical evidences from Rome. In Data Analytics: Paving the Way to Sustainable Urban Mobility; Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Nathanail, E.G., Karakikes, I.D., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 147–155. [Google Scholar]
- Yannis, G.; Antoniou, C.; Papadimitriou, E. Autoregressive nonlinear time-series modeling of traffic fatalities in Europe. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2011, 3, 113–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, Q.; Weng, J. A Genetic algorithm approach to assessing work zone casualty risk. Saf. Sci. 2011, 49, 1283–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prato, C.G.; Bekhor, S.; Galtzur, A.; Mahalel, D.; Prashker, J. Exploring the potential of data mining techniques for the analysis of accident patterns. In Proceedings of the 12th WCTR Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, 11–15 July 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, W.; Chen, H.; Bell, M.C. Vehicle Breakdown Duration Modelling. J. Transp. Stat. 2005, 8, 75–84. [Google Scholar]
- Hojati, A.T.; Ferreira, L.; Charles, P.; bin Kabit, M.R. Analysing freeway traffic-incident duration using an Australian data set. Road Transp. Res. J. Aust. New Zealand Res. Pract. 2012, 21, 19. [Google Scholar]
- Transport for New South Wales. NSW Road Fatalities Report; Centre for Road Safety, Transport for New South Wales (TfNSW): Sydney, Australia, 2020.
- Transport for New South Wales Household Travel Survey Report: Sydney 2012/13; Bureau of Transport Statistics, Transport for New South Wales (TfNSW): Sydney, Australia, 2014.
- ABS. Survey of Motor Vehicle Use, Australia; Australian Bureau of Statistics: Australian Capital Territory, Australia, 2017.
- New South Wales Government. NSW Spatial Data Catalogue. 2015. Available online: https://sdi.nsw.gov.au/nswsdi/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid=%7B10377F94-15B6-4F6D-8608-FEBCC59E373D%7D (accessed on 28 July 2020).
- Transport for New South Wales. NSW Road Network. 2020. Available online: https://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/node/4888 (accessed on 27 July 2020).
- Moylan, E.K.M.; Chand, S.; Waller, T. Framework for Estimating the Impact of Camera-Based Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technology on Incident Duration. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2018, 2672, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, D.; Guldmann, J.-M.; Choi, C. Factors Contributing to the Relationship between Driving Mileage and Crash Frequency of Older Drivers. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Truong, L.T.; Kieu, L.-M.; Vu, T.A. Spatiotemporal and random parameter panel data models of traffic crash fatalities in Vietnam. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2016, 94, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, E.; Tarko, A.P. Modeling safety of highway work zones with random parameters and random effects models. Anal. Methods Accid. Res. 2014, 1, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noland, R.B.; Quddus, M.A. Analysis of Pedestrian and Bicycle Casualties with Regional Panel Data. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2004, 1897, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lord, D.; Mannering, F. The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2010, 44, 291–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Coruh, E.; Bilgic, A.; Tortum, A. Accident analysis with aggregated data: The random parameters negative binomial panel count data model. Anal. Methods Accid. Res. 2015, 7, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.; Li, C.; Miwa, T.; Morikawa, T. An Exploration of Factors Affecting Drivers’ Daily Fuel Consumption Efficiencies Considering Multi-Level Random Effects. Sustainability 2019, 11, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, P.; Huang, H. Modeling crash spatial heterogeneity: Random parameter versus geographically weighting. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2015, 75, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shugan, S.M. Editorial: Errors in the Variables, Unobserved Heterogeneity, and Other Ways of Hiding Statistical Error. Mark. Sci. 2006, 25, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Washington, S.P.; Karlaftis, M.G.; Mannering, F. Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis; CRC press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Bhowmik, T.; Yasmin, S.; Eluru, N. A multilevel generalized ordered probit fractional split model for analyzing vehicle speed. Anal. Methods Accid. Res. 2019, 21, 13–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- STATA. Multilevel Generalized Linear Models|Stata. 2020. Available online: https://www.stata.com/features/overview/multilevel-generalized-linear-models/ (accessed on 28 July 2020).
- Hausman, J.; Hall, B.; Griliches, Z. Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship. Econometrica 1984, 52, 909–938. [Google Scholar]
- Chin, H.C.; Quddus, M.A. Applying the random effect negative binomial model to examine traffic accident occurrence at signalized intersections. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2003, 35, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shankar, V.N.; Albin, R.B.; Milton, J.C.; Mannering, F. Evaluating Median Crossover Likelihoods with Clustered Accident Counts: An Empirical Inquiry Using the Random Effects Negative Binomial Model. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1998, 1635, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.; Hu, J.; Tang, J.; Guo, Z. Crash prediction based on random effect negative binomial model considering data heterogeneity. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2020, 547, 123858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gujarati, D.N. Basic Econometrics; Tata McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- RAC. Breakdown Britain; Royal Automobile Club: Walsall, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- AAA. Fact Sheet-Preventive Maintenance; American Automobile Institution: Heathrow, FL, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Prytz, R.; Nowaczyk, S.; Rögnvaldsson, T.; Byttner, S. Analysis of Truck Compressor Failures Based on Logged Vehicle Data. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Data Mining, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 22–25 July 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Dixit, V.V.; Gayah, V.V.; Radwan, E. Comparison of Driver Behavior by Time of Day and Wet Pavement Conditions. J. Transp. Eng. 2012, 138, 1023–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Variable | Freq. | Mean | Std. Dev. | Min. | Max. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dependent variable: Frequency of breakdowns | Monthly | 60 | 81 | 0 | 416 |
Exposure variables | |||||
Logarithm of population density (per sq. km.) | TI * | 4.70 | 2.88 | −1.04 | 8.5 |
Total registered vehicles (in 10,000) | Yearly | 17.81 | 5.74 | 8.17 | 34.81 |
Socioeconomic variables | |||||
Income (in 10,000 AUD) | TI | 4.45 | 0.58 | 3.46 | 5.74 |
Percentage of income earners | TI | 51.18 | 4.47 | 43.00 | 59.00 |
Percentage of managers and professionals | TI | 35.26 | 9.25 | 23.30 | 57.50 |
Percentage of families with children aged less than 15 years | TI | 47.54 | 4.81 | 35.05 | 57.41 |
Percentage of young adults (aged 19–29) | TI | 13.39 | 3.35 | 8.00 | 25.00 |
Percentage of people born overseas | TI | 28.06 | 14.31 | 11.80 | 52.40 |
Percentage of people who speak language other than English at home | TI | 18.06 | 17.66 | 2.20 | 59.10 |
Vehicle characteristics | |||||
Percentage of vehicles aged less than 5 years | Yearly | 24.99 | 4.52 | 17.00 | 38.91 |
Percentage of vehicles aged between 5 and 10 years | Yearly | 28.60 | 2.48 | 24.14 | 34.88 |
Percentage of vehicles aged greater than 5 years | Yearly | 46.40 | 6.44 | 33.23 | 57.50 |
Percentage of heavy vehicles | Yearly | 3.50 | 1.58 | 1.01 | 7.27 |
Percentage of vehicles operated by petrol | Yearly | 80.81 | 7.40 | 64.29 | 91.25 |
Percentage of vehicles operated by diesel | Yearly | 17.15 | 7.40 | 7.20 | 35.38 |
Percentage of vehicles operated by Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) | Yearly | 2.02 | 0.80 | 1.11 | 4.22 |
Weather variables | |||||
Average temperature (°C) | Monthly | 17.63 | 4.65 | 5.65 | 27.95 |
Average rainfall (cm) | Monthly | 7.64 | 3.14 | 1.95 | 16.47 |
Driver licenses | |||||
Percentage of drivers with learners’ licenses | Quarterly | 5.22 | 1.41 | 3.46 | 9.32 |
Percentage of drivers with P1 licenses | Quarterly | 2.92 | 0.57 | 1.92 | 4.30 |
Percentage of drivers with P2 licenses | Quarterly | 5.24 | 1.13 | 3.64 | 8.91 |
Percentage of drivers with unrestricted licenses | Quarterly | 86.62 | 2.74 | 79.77 | 89.98 |
Other variables | |||||
Number of school holidays | Monthly | 4 | 5 | 0 | 18 |
Number of public holidays | Monthly | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Variable | Coefficient | Std. Err. | z | Elasticity (% Change) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Year 2012 | Fixed | - | - | - |
Year 2013 | 0.167 | 0.016 | 10.41 | - |
Year 2014 | 0.131 | 0.020 | 6.67 | - |
Year 2015 | 0.157 | 0.024 | 6.57 | - |
Year 2016 | 0.218 | 0.031 | 7.02 | - |
Logarithm of population density (per sq. km.) | 0.191 | 0.045 | 4.26 | 1.33 |
Total registered vehicles (in 10,000) | 0.068 | 0.012 | 5.65 | 1.40 |
Average temperature (°C) | 0.009 | 0.001 | 6.35 | 0.17 |
Average rainfall (cm) | −0.017 | 0.003 | −6.25 | −0.14 |
Percentage of managers and professionals | 0.051 | 0.010 | 5.18 | 2.17 |
Percentage of families with children aged less than 15 years | −0.062 | 0.016 | −3.81 | −2.87 |
Percentage of heavy vehicles | 0.083 | 0.028 | 3.01 | 0.24 |
Percentage of drivers with unrestricted licenses | −0.074 | 0.027 | −2.75 | −6.21 |
Number of school holidays | −0.007 | 0.001 | −6.09 | −0.70 * |
Number of public holidays | 0.016 | 0.007 | 2.29 | 1.60 * |
Intercept | 8.611 | 2.737 | 3.15 | - |
Parameter, a | 5.241 | 1.578 | ||
Parameter, b | 4.137 | 1.288 | ||
Log-likelihood | −5150 | |||
Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) | 10,333 | |||
Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) | 10,424 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chand, S.; Moylan, E.; Waller, S.T.; Dixit, V. Analysis of Vehicle Breakdown Frequency: A Case Study of New South Wales, Australia. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198244
Chand S, Moylan E, Waller ST, Dixit V. Analysis of Vehicle Breakdown Frequency: A Case Study of New South Wales, Australia. Sustainability. 2020; 12(19):8244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198244
Chicago/Turabian StyleChand, Sai, Emily Moylan, S. Travis Waller, and Vinayak Dixit. 2020. "Analysis of Vehicle Breakdown Frequency: A Case Study of New South Wales, Australia" Sustainability 12, no. 19: 8244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198244
APA StyleChand, S., Moylan, E., Waller, S. T., & Dixit, V. (2020). Analysis of Vehicle Breakdown Frequency: A Case Study of New South Wales, Australia. Sustainability, 12(19), 8244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198244