Next Article in Journal
A Causal Model of the Sustainable Use of Resources: A Case Study on a Woodworking Process
Next Article in Special Issue
Melatonin as Master Regulator in Plant Growth, Development and Stress Alleviator for Sustainable Agricultural Production: Current Status and Future Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Water Scarcity and Wastewater Reuse in Crop Irrigation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Field Performance of Allelopathic Bacteria for Biological Weed Control in Wheat: Innovative, Sustainable and Eco-Friendly Approach for Enhanced Crop Production
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review on Practical Application and Potentials of Phytohormone-Producing Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria for Inducing Heavy Metal Tolerance in Crops

1
Department of Soil Science, University College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan
2
Pesticide Quality Control Laboratory Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan
3
National Engineering Laboratory for Improving Quality of Arable Land, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
4
College of Life Sciences, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China
5
Department of Plant Pathology, University College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan
6
Soil and Environmental Biotechnology Division, National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad 44000, Pakistan
7
Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
First two authors contributed equally to this work.
Sustainability 2020, 12(21), 9056; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219056
Submission received: 29 September 2020 / Revised: 23 October 2020 / Accepted: 27 October 2020 / Published: 30 October 2020

Abstract

:
Water scarcity and high input costs have compelled farmers to use untreated wastewater and industrial effluents to increase profitability of their farms. Normally, these effluents improve crop productivity by serving as carbon source for microbes, providing nutrients to plants and microbes, and improving soil physicochemical and biological properties. They, however, may also contain significant concentrations of potential heavy metals, the main inorganic pollutants affecting plant systems, in addition to soil deterioration. The continuous use of untreated industrial wastes and agrochemicals may lead to accumulation of phytotoxic concentration of heavy metals in soils. Phytotoxic concentration of heavy metals in soils has been reported in Pakistan along the road sides and around metropolitan areas, which may cause its higher accumulation in edible plant parts. A number of bacterial that can induce heavy metal tolerance in plants due to their ability to produce phytohormones strains have been reported. Inoculation of crop plants with these microbes can help to improve their growth and productivity under normal, as well as stressed, conditions. This review reports the recent developments in heavy metal pollution as one of the major inorganic sources, the response of plants to these contaminants, and heavy metal stress mitigation strategies. We have also summarized the exogenous application of phytohormones and, more importantly, the use of phytohormone-producing, heavy metal-tolerant rhizobacteria as one of the recent tools to deal with heavy metal contamination and improvement in productivity of agricultural systems.

1. Introduction

Climate change is among the leading factors affecting water availability. Water scarcity for irrigation is a result of drought spells, depletion of surface and ground water resources, and shifting of fresh water for domestic and industrial use [1]. The use of untreated wastewater has been widely accepted by the farmers in Pakistan due to easy availability around metropolitan areas and in peri-urban areas. The use of industrial wastewater and sewage is gaining popularity due to the provision of dissolved plant nutrients and organic matter, which improves soil biological properties and its physical quality [2]. Urbanization and industrialization caused a significant reduction in productive lands for agriculture, which challenged scientists to develop strategies for meeting food requirements through existing sources. In the current scenario, the increase in cultivation area seems difficult, so strategies are required to improve the crop productivity per unit area. The use of agrochemicals and intensive cultivation may result in deterioration of land resources and environmental quality.
Environmental pollution is one of the major problems all over the globe, particularly in metropolitan areas and industrial cities. The problem is more severe in developing countries, including Pakistan, due to unplanned disposal of untreated sewage water, industrial effluents, farms wastes, and application of agrochemicals. Normally, these wastes and agrochemicals improve crop productivity by serving as a carbon source for microbes, providing nutrients to plants and microbes, and improving soil physicochemical and biological properties. They, however, may also contain significant concentrations of potential heavy metals, including nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), and chromium (Cr), etc., [3]. Globally, soil pollution with heavy metals is increasingly dominant along with agricultural and economic intensification, which, in return, poses serious damages to the soil health and productivity [4]. In Pakistan, the use of industrial effluents, untreated sewage water, agrochemicals, and farm wastes is the major source of organic and inorganic pollutants in soils.
Heavy metals are among the main inorganic pollutants that also affect plant systems, in addition to soil deterioration. These heavy metals may pose toxic or beneficial effects on soil microbes, depending upon bioavailability and nature [5], along with climatic factors. Some heavy metals, including Ni, Mn, and Zn, serve as micronutrients and are required for physiological processes in microbes. They are required in enzyme activity and stabilization of molecules [6]. Others, including Pb, As, mercury (Hg), silver (Ag), Cd, and gold (Au), are not required for body functioning [6]. A few heavy metals, such as Zn and Ni, can be toxic when present in heavy concentrations only. The continuous use of untreated industrial wastes and agrochemicals may lead to accumulation of phytotoxic concentration of heavy metals in soils [7]. These metals, when taken up by plants, become a part of food chain and affect humans and animals. The phytotoxic concentrations of these heavy metals may adversely affect the entire environment, including plants, soil, animals, and human beings [8].
Cadmium is one of the most toxic heavy metals for soil, plants, animals, and human beings [9]. The main source of Cd in soils is anthropogenic activities. Cadmium compounds are more soluble than other heavy metals, which favors its bioavailability, absorption, and accumulation in plant systems. Cadmium can easily be translocated to aerial parts so Cd-induced phytotoxicity has widely been reported in literature [10,11,12]. Cadmium-induced negative impacts on plants include physiological, morphological, biochemical, and molecular changes in plants [13]. It can also induce oxidative stress that can cause inhibition of seed germination, water and ionic imbalance, a decrease in photosynthesis, cellular organelles and cell membrane disintegration, and a decrease in protein synthesis that leads to decreased crop productivity [14]. Cadmium also affects soil biology and microbial activity, thus disturbing microbial community structure and functioning.
Phytotoxic concentration of Cd (5.8 to 6.11 mg kg−1) in soils has been reported in Pakistan along the road sides [15], which may cause its higher accumulation in edible plant parts, as reported in paddies (0.116 to 0.370 mg ka−1) by Nawaz et al. [16] in areas around Faisalabad. Lead and Cr are also widely spread in top layers of soils, as they are aerially deposited from smoke of vehicles [9]. Other sources include mining, industries, and agrochemicals. Variable soil lead concentration (10 to 293 mg kg−1) has been reported in agricultural soils [17]. Potentially hazardous levels of Cr (VI) have also been reported in soil samples around residential colonies, industries, and recreational sites [18].
Cadmium is promptly absorbed and accumulated in plant tissues due to its high solubility, which makes it highly toxic to plants, leading to disruption of the entire plant’s metabolic functions [19]. Plants responds to Cd stress by synthesizing stress-related proteins and signaling molecules. Plant roots release a number of chelating compounds, which include low molecular weight organic acids, nicotianamine, and phytosiderophores [20]. These compounds may affect the heavy metals uptake by plants. Studies on functional genomics report complex regulatory networks, which are associated with Cd stress in plants [19]. Nutrient management is also one of the possible responses of plants to Cd stress [21]. Similarly, chromium (Cr) is a toxic trace element for the plants growing in Cr-contaminated soils. Its higher concentration causes deterioration of certain metabolic, physiological, and biochemical attributes, resulting in stunted growth and development of plants [3]. Accumulation of Cr in higher quantities results in generation of reactive oxygen species that causes damages to the cell structure, and hence disturbs the normal metabolism of the plants [22]. Higher concentrations of Cr are found in areas having tanning industries and slaughter houses, where the effluent often contains Cr concentrations in toxic levels [3].
Lead (Pb), on the other hand, makes its way into the soil through industrial activities and is found in higher amounts in areas near public societies, industrial set-ups, roads, and highways [23]. Higher concentrations of Pb in plant bodies cause certain morpho-physiological damages and results in poor growth and development and hence limits crop production [24]. Intake of food contaminated with Pb is associated with development of chronic diseases in humans, leading to failure of human organs [25].
Heavy metal contamination of soils is a complex process and a number of conventional physicochemical methods are being used to remediate the metal-contaminated soils, which are costly, less efficient, and are not suitable for large-scale application [26]. Moreover, financial and technical implications have made soil remediation a difficult task to be achieved in the current era [27].
Use of phytohormone-producing heavy metal tolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can be used as an alternate strategy to decontaminate heavy metal-polluted soils, which is a more efficient, inexpensive, sustainable, and ecofriendly approach [28]. The PGPR produce phytohormones, in addition to several other growth-promoting traits, can reduce the heavy metal toxicity and improve crop growth under heavy metal polluted soil conditions [29,30,31]. Phytohormone-producing Cd-tolerant PGPR can be effective to induce resistance against heavy metal toxicity in crop plants. Scientists have reported a number of Cd, Pb, Ni, As, Zn, Cu, Fe, and Cr-tolerant PGPR strains belonging to different genera such as Ochrobactrum [32], Bradyrhizobium [33], Chryseobacterium [34], Klebsiella [35], Serratia [36], Bacillus spp. [37], Ralstonia [38], Exiguobacterium [39], Stenotrophomonas, Morganella and Providencia [40], Enterobacter [11,41], Leifsonia [42], Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJn [31], Burkholderia cepacia [43] Pseudomonas fluorescens [44], and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [45]. These strains have been well documented to have multifarious plant growth-promoting traits, in additions to phytohormone producing ability, and thus can be used to develop biofertilizer for inducing heavy metal stress tolerance in crop plants. This review provides an overview on the current status of application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to confer resistance against heavy metals in plants as a most feasible alternate strategy. Special attention has been given to the potentials of exogenous application of phytohormones, especially the phytohormones producing plant growth and promoting rhizobacteria in remediation of metal polluted soils and healthier crop production.

2. Heavy Metals as Inorganic Pollutants

Environmental pollution is one of the most serious problems faced by mankind over the globe. It is more severe around big cities and metropolitan areas, particularly in developing countries like Pakistan. The agricultural use of untreated wastewater and sewage sludge from industries, use of agrochemicals, and automobiles are among the main sources of environmental pollution. These effluents may contain a number of organic and inorganic pollutants, including heavy metals. The toxicity or beneficial effect of heavy metals on plants and microbes be beneficial or harmful for microbes, depending upon the nature and bioavailability of metals. For example, heavy metals like Mg, Zn, Co, Mn, Cr, Cu, Fe, and Ni are considered to be the essential elements for microorganisms due to their involvement in a number of physiological processes [46]. These may be part of enzyme complexes, act as stabilizing molecules, or play direct role in redox reactions [7]. Some others, such as Ag, Al, Hg, Au, Pb, Sb, and As, do not have a biological role in microbial metabolic processes [7]. The higher concentrations of these heavy metals can be toxic to microbes due to complexation with body parts. Moreover, some of the essential heavy metals, such as Ni and Zn, can be toxic to microbial bodies when present in higher concentrations.
Untreated wastewater contains a number of organic and inorganic pollutants, including heavy metals such as Pb and Cd [47]. Long-term use of wastewater incorporates contaminants such as heavy metals and salts in agricultural soils, making them unfit for crops and microorganisms [3,48] Previous studies have reported that sewage water application resulted in increased accumulation of Cr, Pb, and Cd, which caused a deterioration in the quality of vegetables [49]. The phytotoxic concentration of heavy metals in soils may result in accumulation of these metals in crops and vegetables to thus enter into food web [7,50]. It has been reported that irrigation of vegetables with untreated industrial effluents caused the higher accumulation of Ar, Ni, Co, Pb, and Cd in the edible portions of vegetables, which may pose potential health problems.
Heavy metals have been recognized by the environmentalists as the major inorganic pollutants due to their toxic nature. Heavy metal contamination of foods has been reported as a major threat to human health, as these metals have more potential to transfer into food chains [51]. Heavy metals are naturally occurring in normal water and soils, however, many of them are toxic even in very lower concentrations [52]. For example, metals such as As, Co, Cr, Hg, Ni, Pb, and Cd are highly toxic, even in very minute quantities. Anthropogenic activities, such as mining, automobiles, agrochemicals, and discharge of untreated industrial effluents, are the major cause of heavy metal accumulation in our environmental compartments [50,53].
The accumulation of heavy metals in soft tissues of the body make them more toxic as they cannot be metabolized by the normal physiological processes. Soils have been considered as the major sink for heavy metal accumulation as a result of the aforementioned anthropogenic activities. Mostly, heavy metals are nondegradable and do not undergo any chemical or microbial degradation so they can persist in the environment for longer periods once being released into the environment [54,55]. The presence of heavy metals in the environment as pollutants is a serious issue that is destroying the environment. They are more harmful than organic pollutants, as most of the organic pollutants are biodegradable. The degradation rate of organic pollutants can, however, be decreased due to the presence of heavy metals, thus they in fact double the environmental pollution problems [56].

3. Plant Response to Heavy Metal Stress

The bioaccumulation of higher concentrations of heavy metals as pollutants in the environment has become one of the major threats for living organisms. The toxic levels of heavy metals may interact with important biomolecules in the cell, including DNA and protein, leading to excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Serious physiological, metabolic, and morphological anomalies thus occur in plants, ranging from chlorosis of leaves, to protein degradation and lipid peroxidation [57].
In response to heavy metal stress, plants have developed a number of defensive mechanisms at physical and molecular levels. The morphological structures, such as formation of trichomes, thick cuticles, and cell walls are among the physiological barriers that have been studied to be evolved in plants in response to heavy metal stress [58]. For example, trichomes either have the ability to secrete secondary metabolites that cope with harmful effects of metals or serve as primary storage sites for heavy metals to detoxify them [59]. In some cases, however, heavy metals overcome the biophysical barriers to enter into plant tissues and cells. Once these metal ions enter into plant tissues and cells, several defensive mechanisms are initiated in plants to attenuate and nullify the heavy metal toxicity.
Plants, for instance, produce several biomolecules at the cellular level to cope with heavy metal toxicity. A number of organic compounds, such as metallothioneins, phytochelatins, glutathione, mugineic acids, and putrescine, or protons, phenolic compounds, heat shock proteins, and flavonoids are produced as defensive mechanisms. Some specific amino acids and hormones, like jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, and ethylene, are also produced in response to metal stress [60,61,62].
A failure of the above-mentioned strategies results in the imbalance of the cellular redox systems that induces the production of ROS. In such situations, plants develop antioxidant defense mechanisms to cope with free radicals’ toxicity. Thus, enzymatic antioxidants like catalase, (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), glutathione reductase (GR), and superoxide dismutase (SOD), and nonenzymatic antioxidants, like tocopherols, proline, alkaloids, carotenoids, glutathione (GSH), and ascorbate (AsA), along with phenolic compounds, such as lignin, tannins, and flavonoids, are produced that have the ability to act as scavengers of free radicals in crop plants that suffer different stresses [63,64,65,66,67].
Metal complexation and removal at intra and intercellular level by formation of metallothioneins (MTs) or phytochelatins (PCs) and production of polysaccharides and organic acids have also been studied in plants [61,68,69]. Plants detoxify heavy metals by producing low molecular weight PCs using the enzyme phytochelatin synthase (PCS). These PCs have high affinity to heavy metals when present at toxic concentrations [70]. Different species of microorganisms and animals produce PCs as a pathway for heavy metal detoxification and homeostasis [71]. Literature has reported that plants produce PCs in response to different abiotic stresses, including heavy metal stress, herbicides, and excess of UV-B, heat stress, and salinity stress [72]. Thus, production of PCs can be used as biomarkers for early detection of heavy metal stress in crop plants [73]. The Cd2+ ions have been identified as strong inducers of PCs in red spruce [74]. The PCs can be produced and accumulated both in roots and aerial parts, however, studies suggest that they are first produced in roots. For example, in sunflowers, Cd stress induced two times more PCs in roots than leaves [75]. In another study, Heiss et al. [76] reported that prolonged Cd stress in Brassica juncea produced three times more PCs in leaves than roots. The study thus led to the identification of PCS genes in Brassica juncea. Metallothioneins are small cysteine-rich, low molecular weight metal-binding proteins or polypeptides that are produced in a number of organisms, including microorganisms and plants [77]. The MTs show strong affinity with heavy metals such as As, Cd, Zn, and Cu [78]. In plants, the MTs nullify the toxicity of heavy metals through metal transport adjustment, homeostasis of intracellular metal ions, and cellular sequestration of heavy metals [79].
Certain plant species have developed mechanisms for nonenzymatic synthesis of organic compounds such as proline (Pro). These metabolites help plants to detoxify metals, thus strengthening mechanisms of intracellular antioxidant enzymes. For example, Gohari et al. [80] reported increased accumulation of Pro in roots of Brassica napus L. in response to Pb2 + stress. The production of plant hormones in response to external stimuli such as heavy metal stress is also a well-established mechanism in plants. These hormones, also called phytohormones, are organic compounds that coordinate plant physiological processes, thus regulating their growth and development. These phytohormones perform functions at the site of production or work at some other place after their transport [81,82].
Among phytohormones, abscisic acid (ABA), indole acetic acid (IAA), ethylene, salicylic acid (SA), gibberellins (GA), jasmonates, and brassinosteroids (BRs) have been well studied to be produced under different abiotic stresses, including heavy metal stress. Ethylene, for instance, is a stress hormone that regulates the senescence in plants, and thus modifies/limits the plant growth under abiotic stress. It has been well documented as a stress tolerance inducer in plants [83]. It is a well-established fact that SA alleviates heavy metal toxicity in plants [84]. The BRs modulate antioxidative defense systems in plants against abiotic stresses [85]. Jasmonates, the multifunctional hormones, have also been reported to be produced in plants under abiotic stresses [86]. Boron is an essential metal but its higher concentration can be toxic for crop plants. For instance, boron application at the rate of 5 mmol L−1 and 12.5 mmol L−1 negatively affected the growth and photosynthetic activity of potato cultivars. The ABA and IAA contents were also significantly increased in both potato cultivars grown under boron stress [87]. Zinc (Zn) application at lower levels increased GA3 contents, while its higher concentration decreased the GA3 level in germinating chickpea seeds [88]. Cytokinins (CKs) modulate plant development and stress conditions altered the endogenous level of CKs, which shows the involvement of CKs in stress tolerance induction in crop plants [89]. The CK production and transport from roots to upper parts decreases through heavy metal stress. The CKs have antagonistic interactions with ABA, therefore the increased production of ABA under heavy metal stress decreases the production of CKs [90].
Abscisic acid has a direct role in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Brien and Benkova [89], for example, observed a rapid increase in endogenous level of ABA in response to environmental stresses. The higher levels of ABA, in turn, activated the specific signaling pathways and modulated the gene expression level in plants. Exposure to heavy metals such as As, Cu, Hg, and Cd induced the overexpression of ABA biosynthetic genes, leading to an increase in endogenous ABA levels in crop plants [91,92].
Indole acetic acid is a multifunctional hormone that is equally effective under normal, as well as stressed, conditions [93]. Increased production of IAA under heavy metal stress has been observed. It was noted that heavy metal stress increased the level of IAA and decreased plant growth that might be due to heavy metal-induced hormonal imbalance [94].
The symbiotic association between higher plants and arbuscular fungi can also effectively immobilize heavy metals, thus reducing their uptake by host plants [95,96]. During such associations, the fungal counterparts bind the metals to the cell wall of their hyphae and also excrete molecules, thus inducing antioxidant defense mechanisms in crop plants. Exploitation of these mechanisms and production of aforementioned biomolecules in response to heavy metal stress depends on plant species, the genotype, and the level of metal tolerance of these crop plants [97]. Although plants have developed mechanisms to deal with heavy metal toxicity, the production of these metabolites divert the normal metabolic processes to defensive ones, thus compromising the yield potentials. It is, therefore, the need of the hour to find ways and means for mitigating the negative impacts of heavy metal stress on crop plants, thus improving the productivity of cropping systems.

4. Heavy Metal Stress Mitigation Strategies

Heavy metals are among the most dangerous pollutants for environment and human population over the globe. These have become more dangerous than pesticides and other well-known inorganic pollutants such as sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide [98]. According to recent opinion, heavy metals may surpass solid and nuclear wastes in terms of their toxicity to the environment [99]. Heavy metals also impart indirect cell toxicity by producing excess reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can inhibit antioxidative systems by inducing oxidative stress. To withstand metal stress and metal toxicity, plants use certain defense mechanisms, such as activation of various antioxidant enzyme systems, binding of heavy metals to phytochelatins/metallothioneins, metal sequestration into vacuoles, and reduction in heavy metal uptake [100]. Certain plants have developed strong antioxidative systems, and thus can better adapt to heavy metal stress [101].
Different physicochemical strategies are being used to decontaminate the heavy metal-contaminated sites. These techniques include physicochemical extraction (washing of soil), in situ fixation by changing the metal structure through chemicals, metal stabilization, and excavation [91]. Physicochemical techniques adversely affect soil physicochemical and biological properties, leading to secondary pollution in soils as reported by Ali et al. [102]. Due to these hazards, as well as high cost and less efficiency of these strategies [103], scientists are trying to find out cost-effective, eco-friendly, and reproducible solutions to remediate heavy metal contaminated soils.
Environmentalists and biological scientists are working together to develop potential alternative strategies to deal with heavy metal toxicity. Heavy metal contamination of agricultural soils is a serious environmental issue. Plants cope with heavy metal stress by modulating their metabolic processes through production of phytohormones. In recent years, the exogenous application has been well recognized as an alternative technology to deal with heavy metal toxicity in agricultural soils. Certain soil microbes can tolerate higher concentrations of heavy metals and also have the ability to produce phytohormones, so application of phytohormone-producing heavy metal-tolerant PGPR can be a promising approach to tackle the serious issue of heavy metal toxicity in agricultural systems.

4.1. Exogenous Application of Phytohormones

Exogenous application of phytohormones is considered as an eco-friendly and cost-effective approach to deal with heavy metal toxicity in crop plants. Phytohormones regulate plant metabolic processes, thus helping them survive under biotic and abiotic stresses [104]. Exogenously applied phytohormones can mitigate heavy metal toxicity by enhancing the efficacy of antioxidative enzyme systems through reduction in lipid peroxidation and ROS levels in plants. For instance, salicylic acid, ethylene, and brassinosteroids have been reported to enhance photosynthesis in plants grown under heavy metal stress by reducing the ROS level and lipid peroxidation through improvement in antioxidative enzyme systems [105].
Brassinosteroids, a comparatively new class of hormones, have been recognized to induce Cu stress tolerance in mustard by Sharma and Bhardwaj [106]. They exogenously applied brassinosteroids to seven-day old seedlings of Brassica juncea under Cu stress and reported significant improvement in emergence of shoots as compared to control. The brassinosteroid application also reduced the uptake and accumulation of Cu in plants grown under Cu stress. In another study, Choudhary et al. [107] reported the improvement in shoot and root growth, and a decrease in Cu toxicity to Raphanus raphanistrum subsp. Sativus plants by application of epibrassinolide under Cu stress. They also observed the change in ABA, IAA, and polyamine concentration in radish plants and improvement in antioxidative enzyme systems of radish seedlings subjected to copper stress. Recently, Yadav et al. [108] reported that exogenously applied castasterone helped to improve the antioxidative defense system of Brassica juncea L. plants under Cu stress by modifying the amino acid metabolism and ascorbate glutathione cycle.
Similarly, Alam et al. [109] studied the effectiveness of 28-homobrassinolide application under nickel stress in Brassica juncea. They analyzed leaves of 40-day old mustard plants and reported the improvement in plant growth, chlorophyll contents, and photosynthesis in mustard plants grown under Ni stress. The phytohormone application also improved the activities of the antioxidative enzyme system, which is evident by the increase in activities of glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, carbonic anhydrase, and nitrate reductase. Thus, exogenous application of phytohormones reduced the Ni toxicity in mustard plants.
Cadmium is also one of the most toxic heavy metal pollutants in soils that enters into soil systems through anthropogenic activities. Janeczko et al. [110] studied the effect of 24-epibrassinolide on 14-day old seedlings of rapeseed under Cd stress. The results showed that phytohormone application decreased the Cd toxicity by recovering damage to photosystem two and improving efficiency of photosynthetic electron transport. In another study, Rady, [111] reported the improvement in growth, yield, Cd content, and antioxidative defense system of Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants by 24-epibrassinolide application under Cd stress. Similarly, improvement in plant growth, the antioxidant system, and photosynthesis of Cicer arietinum was observed by exogenous application of 28-homobrassinolide under Cd stress by Hassan et al. [112].
Recently, Jan et al. [113] studied the combined effect of silicon and 24-epibrassinolide on Pisum sativum L. under Cd stress. They reported that combined application of silicon and 24-epibrassinolide modulated the negative effect of Cd by stabilizing the leaf RWC, photosynthetic efficiency, and gas exchange parameters of plants grown under Cd toxicity. They also observed that combined application of phytohormone and silicon was effective in glyoxalase I (GlyI) accumulation and maintenance of the antioxidative defense system. Similarly, Kaur et al. [114] reported that combined application of citric acid and castasterone restored the photosynthetic parameters in Brassica juncea L. under Cd stress. They observed significant improvement in anthocyanin and flavonoid content in leaves of 30-day old mustard plants. The combined use of citric acid and castasterone also increased the activity of chalcone synthase and phytoene synthase genes of mustard plants under Cd stress.
The combined use of salicylic acid and 24-epibrassinolide reduced the Pb toxicity in 10-day old seedlings of Brassica juncea L. plants [115]. They reported that the use of salicylic acid and 24-epibrassinolide in combination improved the growth and photosynthetic pigments of mustard seedlings under Pb stress by regulating the antioxidative defense system. A significant improvement in tocopherol, ascorbic acid glutathione content was also observed. In another study, improvement in growth and pigment contents in root, shoot, and leaves of 30, 60, and 90 old Pb-stressed mustard plants was observed by the combined application of salicylic acid and 24-epibrassinolide [116]. They also reported the improvement in phenolic compounds in Brassica juncea L. under Pb stress.
Cytokinins (CKs) are a group of plant hormones that have a major role in plant growth and development, however, they are also involved in plant stress responses [117]. Tassi et al. [118], for example, studied the effect of CK-based plant growth regulators on assisted phytoextraction of Zn and Pb in heavy metal-contaminated soil of a gas plant site. They analyzed the roots, stem, and leaves of 49-day old Helianthus annuus L. plants and reported that CKs stimulated the cell division and root initiation, and thus improved biomass production and positively assisted in phytoextraction of heavy metals. The CKs also increased the transpiration of plants growing under Pb and Zn-stressed conditions. In another study, Piotrowska-Niczyporuk et al. [119] studied the effect of exogenous application of CKs on the growth and metabolism of green microalga under Cu, Pb, and Cd stress. They reported that phytohormones inhibited the heavy metal absorption and increased the primary metabolite level in Chlorella vulgaris L. under multimetal stressed conditions. They also reported the positive role of CKs on the algal growth, antioxidant enzyme systems, and ability of algae to adapt to metal-contaminated conditions in aquatic environments. Similarly, Cassina et al. [120] reported the increased transpiration rate and plant biomass of Alyssum murale Waldst. & Kit by cytokinin application under Ni stress.
Auxins play a role in plant developmental processes, as well as environmental stress responses. They have been well documented to be involved in heavy metal stress tolerance induction in crop plants [92,121,122]. Auxins have been reported to improve Pb and Zn phytoextraction ability, and root and shoot growth of Helianthus annuus L. [123]. Similarly, Hadi et al. [124] reported that combined use of IAA and GA3 increased the plant growth and Pb uptake and translocation ability of Zea mays L. In another study, improvement in phytoextraction ability and plant growth of Panicum virgatum L. has been reported by combined application of auxin and citric acid under Pb toxicity [125]. Similarly, Bashri and Prasad (2015) [126] reported the improved antioxidant activity and ascorbate-glutathione cycle in Trigonella foenumgraecum L. plants under Cd stress. They also observed that IAA improved the growth and chlorophyll a content of Trigonella foenumgraecum L. under Cd stress. Exogenous application of IAA increased the growth of Brassica juncea plants under As stress. This can be attributed to hormonally induced miRNAs expression that regulated the As response under exogenous application of IAA. It was shown to improve growth of plants under HM (As) stress [127].
Gibberellins play an important role in plant developmental processes and positively influence heavy metal stress responses [106]. Gangwar et al. [128], for example, reported that exogenous gibberellic acid application improved antioxidative enzyme systems and upregulated the nitrogen assimilation enzymes in Pisum sativum (L.) seedlings under Cr toxicity. In another study, Zhu et al. [129] reported that gibberellic acid alleviated the Cd toxicity by decreasing nitric oxide and Cd content accumulation, as well as stimulating the expression of Cd2+ uptake-related gene-IRT1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Hadi et al. [130] reported that GA3, in combination with synthetic chelator, improved phytoremediation of Cd-contaminated soil and increased the growth and biomass of Parthenium hysterophorus under Cd stress. In another study, upregulation of Fe translocation and transport was observed in rice by gibberellins application under Fe deficiency [131].
The exogenously applied methyl jasmonate effectively reduced the negative effect of Cd stress in seedlings of Capsicum frutescens [132]. They reported the activation of antioxidative defense mechanisms in plants in response to exogenous application of methyl jasmonate. Exogenous application of MeJA modulated the GR, SOD, and CAT activity, along with improvement in glutathione pools in O. sativa under Cd toxicity [133]. The exogenously applied MeJA also reduced transpiration and photosynthetic damage, controlled stomatal aperture, and maintained endogenous levels of JA by reducing the Cd uptake.
Salicylic acid has been well documented to alleviate metal toxicity in crop plants. For example, Belkhadi et al. [134] studied the effects of exogenously applied salicylic acid on leaf lipid contents Linum usitatissimum L. under Cd toxicity. They reported that SA application raised the MDA level, total lipids and linoleic content, and chlorophyll contents in Linum usitatissimum L., thus improving tolerance to Cd toxicity. In another study, Kazemi et al. [135] reported the improvement in antioxidative enzyme system along with decrease in H2O2, lipid peroxidation level, and proline contents in Brassica napus L. through exogenously applied SA in combination with nitric oxide. Similarly, Xu et al. [136,137] reported the Cd-tolerance induction in peanut plants (Arachis hypogaea) through combined application of SA and nitric oxide. They reported the improvement in plant growth, photosynthetic activity, chlorophyll contents, and mineral nutrition in peanut plants under cd stress. The SA application also stimulated antioxidant enzyme activities and increased the nonenzymatic antioxidants contents.
Recently, Kohli et al. [138,139] reported that combined application of SA and 24-epibrassinolide mitigated the Pb toxicity in Brassica juncea L. by changing the level of various metabolites. They observed improvement in relative water content and the heavy metal tolerance index by combined application of SA and 24-epibrassinolide. A significant decrease in polyphenol contents, thiol level, and metal uptake was also observed. They also reported the upregulation of GR, CAT, POD, SOD, and GST 1 genes by combined application of SA and 24-epibrassinolide. Similarly, improvement in antioxidative defense system and nonenzymatic osmolytes content was also observed [140].
Salicylic acid alleviated the cadmium-induced oxidative damage in Brassica juncea L. plants [86]. The researchers reported that Cd stress reduced the growth, physiology, photosynthesis rate, and relative water contents in mustard plants. They also observed significant increase in electrolyte leakage, lipid peroxidation, and proline contents due to Cd-induced oxidative stress. The SA application, however, showed a marked decrease in these parameters under Cd stress. Salicylic acid also mitigated the Cd-induced growth inhibition of Brassica juncea L. plants. The Cd stress also increased the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as GR, CAT, APX, and SOD, however activities of these enzymes were reduced by exogenous application of SA. Similarly, alleviation of mercury toxicity in roots of Medicago sativa has been reported by the exogenous application of SA [141]. These researchers reported a significant improvement in plant growth parameters due to application of SA under mercury stress and correlated this improvement with prevention of oxidative stress Medicago sativa plants. The alleviation of Cd toxicity in soybean seedlings has also been reported due to application of SA [142].
Ethylene is a stress hormone and is produced in plants in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Khan and Khan [143] observed that exogenous application of ethylene can improve photosynthetic activity of crop plants by reducing the negative effects of Ni and Zn in mustard. They reported the improvement in antioxidant metabolic processes, nitrogen use efficiency, and PS II activity. In another study, Khan et al. [144] reported the alleviation of Cd stress in mustard plants by ethylene in the presence of sulfur. They reported the decrease in superoxide and H2O2 accumulation and improvement in glutathione, cysteine, and methionine contents in mustard plants by ethylene application under Cd toxicity.

4.2. Phytohormone Producing Microbes

Rhizosphere serves as a niche for diverse groups or microorganisms due to the presence of root exudates, which serve as a nutrient source for proliferating microorganisms [145,146]. Rhizosphere microbes serve as a natural source of phytohormones. These microbes have the ability to produce compatible solutes, antifungal compounds, and soil enzymes, along with production of auxins, CKs, gibberellins, and ABA. Although very small amounts of phytohormones are produced by soil microbes, they are very crucial for plant metabolic processes [20,147,148]. Phytohormone-producing soil microbes can stimulate developmental processes in plants and can induce tolerance in plants against a number of biotic and abiotic stresses [148,149], which is one of the several plant growth-promoting mechanisms of microbes residing in the rhizosphere and plant tissues [150]. Phytohormone-producing microbes alter the endogenous production of plant hormones [151], thus changing the root morphology and inducing tolerance in plants against heavy metal stress [152].
Heavy metals can affect the microbial phytohormone production ability positively or negatively. For instance, Carlos et al. [153] studied the effect of Mn, Ni, Pb, As, Cu, and Cd on the IAA-producing ability of ten bacterial strains belonging to the genera Escherichia, Klebsiella, Serratia, and Enterobacter. They reported that Cu, Pb, and As positively affected the IAA-producing ability of bacterial strains Serratia K120, Enterobacter K131, Enterobacter N9, and Escherichia N16. The IAA production ability of all tested bacterial strains, except Klebsiella Mc173, was negatively affected by Mn, Ni, and Cd. Interestingly, positive correlation was observed between IAA production ability and ACC deaminase ability of Serratia K120 under heavy metal stress, which in turn helped bacterium to improve growth of Helianthus annuus, thus regarded as a potential candidate for use in phytoremediation purposes. Similarly, Seneviratne et al. [154] reported that Pb and Ni application in pure culture reduced the bacterial growth and IAA production ability of Bradyrhizobium japonicum, while Cu stress caused a nonsignificant decrease in bacterial growth with a slight increase in IAA production. In another study, phytohormone-producing bacterial strains have been reported to accumulate more heavy metals and showed more growth under metal-contaminated liquid media [155].
Diversity of microorganisms can produce phytohormones [156]. For example, Egamberdieva et al. [157] reported phytohormone-producing bacteria belonging to the genera Arthrobacter, Brevibacillus, Bacillus, Enterobacter, Mycobacterium, Cellulosimicrobium, Ochrobactrum, Paenibacillus, Pseudomonas, Pseudoxanthomonas, and Rhizobium. Similarly, Sorty et al. [151] isolated phytohormone-producing stress tolerant microorganisms from Psoralea corylifolia L. These microbes were identified as members of the genera Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, Pantoea, Bacillus, Rhizobium, Sinorhizobium, and Acinetobacter. Mishra et al. [158] reported that Pseudomonas spp. and Ochrobactrum spp. can produce IAA and have great potential for plant growth promotion. Similarly, GA and ABA production by rhizosphere microflora have been well documented in previous studies [159,160].
Seed inoculation with phytohormone-producing microorganisms can induce stress tolerance in plants [161]. For example, Singh et al. [162] presented a comprehensive study on role of microbial inoculation and phytohormones in modulating defense systems in plants. They reported that the number of microorganisms viz. Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Bacillus cereus, Rhizobium phaseoli, Pseudomonas putida, Trichoderma spp., Paenibacillus polymyxa, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Bacillus subtilis Rhizobium spp., Rhodospirillum rubrum, Pantoea agglomerans, and Azotobacter spp. have the ability to synthesize phytohormones.

5. Applications of Phytohormone-Producing Bacteria for Inducing Heavy Metal Stress Tolerance in Plants

Inoculation with beneficial soil microorganisms is emerging as one of the most promising approaches for crop production in modern agrosystems. Studies suggest that plant–soil–microbe interactions can be harnessed to acclimatize plants with metal-polluted environments, and thus can be explored to induce metal tolerance in crop plants [28]. Soil microorganisms can be effective to improve plant growth under heavy metal stress as they have developed different mechanisms (Figure 1) to survive in the presence of heavy metals [163]. They can consume waste by converting complex waste materials into simple/nontoxic compounds and can transform heavy metals into less toxic forms. Soil microbes can also change heavy metal bioavailability by acidification, precipitation, and chelation by producing phytohormones or lowering the soil pH through production of organic acids [164].
Use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) for improving crop productivity under heavy metal stress is an emerging technology that performs dual functions. For example, Román-Ponce et al. [165] isolated and screened 60 bacterial strains from the rhizospheres of two plant species, Spharealcea angustifolia and Prosopis laevigata, growing in heavy metal-contaminated soil. They tested selected PGPR strains and reported that Curtobacterium sp. NM1R1 and Microbacterium sp. CE3R2 were able to tolerate high levels of Cu, Zn, Pb, and As, and were positive for IAA production. They observed that these strains significantly improved the germination and root growth of Brassica nigra under heavy metal stress, and hence, regarded these as potential candidates for bioremediation purposes and improving plant growth under heavy metal stress.
Inoculation with phytohormone-producing bacterial strains viz. Variovorax sp. (Va), Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf) and Bacteroidetes bacterium (Ba), separately and in combination, improved the growth of B. napus in alluvial soil contaminated with Zn and Cd [166]. The single inoculation of bacterial strains significantly improved the potassium concentration in leaves and chlorophyll contents of B. napus plants under metal stress. The combined inoculation with Variovorax sp. (Va), Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf), and Bacteroidetes bacterium (Ba), however, was most promising in improving the physiological parameters of B. napus plants and decreased the concentration of metals in plant roots, possibly through extraction and stabilization of metals. They reported that the tested strains can effectively be used to improve growth of B. napus under metal-contaminated soils that can also help to remediate metal-contaminated soils [166]. Similarly, Sheng et al. [167] reported the improvement in germination and reduction in toxic effects of heavy metals following the growth of Brassica in metal-contaminated/degraded land under the application of metal-tolerant bacteria. In another study, Bacillus sp. RJ16 and Pseudomonas sp. RJ10 promoted the root growth of rapeseed plants growing under toxic concentrations of Cd [168]. Inoculation with rhizobacterial strains, however, also reported to decrease the phytoextraction efficiency of Salix spp. growing under Cd-contaminated soil conditions [169]. Siderophore-producing, heavy metal-tolerant rhizobacterial strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been reported to improve plant growth with reduced uptake of Cd in pumpkin and mustard plants under Cd toxicity [170].
Siderophore-producing, heavy metal-tolerant PGPR can accelerate bioavailability and accumulation of nutrients in plants, thus helping to reduce the deleterious effects of heavy metals on plants as shown in (Table 1). It has been reported that IAA-producing, heavy metal-tolerant rhizobacterial strains Microbacterium sp. 3ZP2, Achromobacter sp. 1AP2 and Rhodococcus erythropolis EC 34 enhanced the biomass of Trifolium repens in the soil spiked with Zn and Cd [171]. They attributed this improvement with the IAA producing ability of bacterial strains, along with their characteristics to produce siderophore and ACC deaminase activity. The strains Arthrobacter sp. EC 10 and Microbacterium sp. 3ZP2 also improved the bioavailable metal concentration in clover rhizosphere, which have thus have been reported as potential phytoremediation agents.
Seneviratne et al. [154] studied the effect of Ni, Pb, and Cu on bacterial growth, IAA production ability, and growth promotion of lettuce seedlings. They reported that IAA-producing bacterial strain B. japonicum was effective in improving the root and shoot growth of lettuce seedlings under heavy metal stress. In another study, inoculation with phytohormone-producing, metal-tolerant bacterial strains Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas moraviensis decreased the toxic effects of heavy metals on wheat growth under saline sodic soil conditions [172,173,174].

6. Conclusions and Future Prospects

Heavy metals are among the most dangerous potential inorganic pollutants, which can enter into food chain through contamination of soil water and air. The problem is more severe around the metropolitan areas and big cities with heavy industries. Production of phytohormones by plants has been reported as a tool to cope with abiotic stresses. However, all plants do not have equal potential to produce phytohormones. Exogenous application of phytohormones to crop plants with low indigenous potential to produce these metabolites has been well documented to reduce the effect of stresses especially heavy metal stress. Literature has reported the potential of exogenous application of microbially produced phytohormones as an efficient tool to increase the stress tolerance of plants. The approach has also been reported as a potential practical approach to induce stress tolerance in crop plants under extreme environments. In addition to producing phytohormones such as cytokinins, auxins, SA, gibberellins, and ABA, these microbes can also improve plant growth by different direct and indirect mechanisms. Thus, microbes have the potential to modify the endogenous hormone production of plants, leading to changes in metabolic processes in plant tissues. These microbes have the potential to be used as preventers of damaging effects of heavy metal stress. The use of phytohormone-producing microbes under heavy metal stress is among the sustainable approaches for crop production under changing environments.
Further studies are needed to characterize the beneficial soil microbes with potential to produce phytohormones for inducing heavy metal stress tolerance in specific crop plants. Soil–plant–microbe interactions should also be studied to evaluate the effectiveness of these microbes with varying physico-chemical properties under different environments. Specific studies are also required to explore the mechanisms associated with production of different metabolites, and their synergistic and antagonistic interactions with host plants. Genetic studies are also needed to investigate the best time to identify the receptors for expression of specific genes of host plants after microbial inoculation, as well as changes in the genetics of associated microbes. Strategies should be devised to improve the plant–microbe interactions using molecular genetics, bioinformatics, and modeling tools to improve crop productivity as well as soil and environmental health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.N. and A.M.; software, M.A.; validation, M.A., X.W., and M.A.E.-E.; formal analysis, F.N. and M.A.E.-E.; resources, M.J.; data curation, A.H.; writing—original draft preparation, F.N. and A.M.; writing—review and editing, Q.S., M.I., M.J., and M.A.E.-E.; visualization, M.A.; supervision, M.A. and A.H.; funding acquisition, A.M. and X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Authors are highly thankful to Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur for providing space and facilities to work. Authors highly acknowledge the Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences for providing Research Assistant Fellowship.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ensink, J.H.J.; Simmons, R.W.; Van der Hoek, W. Wastewater use in Pakistan: The case of Haroonabad and Faisalabad. In Wastewater Use in Irrigated Agriculture Confronting the Livelihood and Environmental Realities; Scott, C.A., Faruqui, N.I., Raschid, L., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2004; pp. 91–99. [Google Scholar]
  2. Nauman, M.; Khalid, S.K. Heavy metals contamination of soils in response to wastewater irrigation in Rawalpindi region. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 2010, 47, 215–224. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bashir, M.A.; Naveed, M.; Ahmad, Z.; Gao, B.; Mustafa, A.; Núñez-Delgado, A. Combined application of biochar and sulfur regulated growth, physiological, antioxidant responses and Cr removal capacity of maize (Zea mays L.) in tannery polluted soils. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 259, 110051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhou, J.; Du, B.; Liu, H.; Cui, H.; Zhang, W.; Fan, X.; Zhou, J. The bioavailability and contribution of the newly deposited heavy metals (copper and lead) from atmosphere to rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 384, 121285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ayangbenro, A.S.; Babalola, O.O. A new strategy for heavy metal polluted environments: A review of microbial biosorbents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bruins, M.R.; Kapil, S.; Oehme, F.W. Microbial resistance to metals in the environment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2000, 45, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kamran, M.; Malik, Z.; Parveen, A.; Huang, L.; Riaz, M.; Bashir, S.; Mustafa, A.; Abbasi, G.H.; Xue, B.; Ali, U. Ameliorative effects of biochar on rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) growth and heavy metal immobilization in soil irrigated with untreated wastewater. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 39, 266–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mapanda, F.; Mangwayana, E.N.; Nyamangara, J.; Giller, K.E. The effect of long term irrigation using waste water on heavy metal content of soil under vegetables in Harare, Zimbabwe. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 107, 151–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Farid, G.; Sarwar, N.; Saifullah, A.A.; Ghafoor, A. Heavy metals (Cd, Ni and Pb) contamination of soils, plants and waters in Madina town of Faisalabad metropolitan and preparation of GIS based maps. ACST 2015, 4, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wan, Y.; Luo, S.; Chen, J.; Xiao, X.; Chen, L.; Zeng, G.; Liu, C.; He, Y. Effect of endophyte-infection on growth parameters and cd-induced phytotoxicity of Cd-hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. Chemosphere 2012, 89, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saeed, Z.; Naveed, M.; Imran, M.; Bashir, M.A.; Sattar, A.; Mustafa, A.; Hussain, A.; Xu, M. Combined use of Enterobacter sp. MN17 and zeolite reverts the adverse effects of cadmium on growth, physiology and antioxidant activity of Brassica napus. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0213016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Sabir, A.; Naveed, M.; Bashir, M.A.; Hussain, A.; Mustafa, A.; Zahir, Z.A.; Kamran, M.; Ditta, A.; Núñez-Delgado, A.; Saeed, Q.; et al. Cadmium mediated phytotoxic impacts in Brassica napus: Managing growth, physiological and oxidative disturbances through combined use of biochar and Enterobacter sp. MN17. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 265, 110522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Naveed, M.; Mustafa, A.; Majeed, S.; Naseem, Z.; Saeed, Q.; Khan, A.; Nawaz, A.; Baig, K.S.; Chen, J.T. Enhancing Cadmium Tolerance and Pea Plant Health through Enterobacter sp. MN17 Inoculation Together with Biochar and Gravel Sand. Plants 2020, 9, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Tran, T.A.; Popova, L.P. Functions and toxicity of cadmium in plants: Recent advances and future prospects. Turk. J. Bot. 2013, 37, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  15. Faiz, Y.; Tufail, M.; Javed, M.T.; Chauhadry, M.; Siddique, N. Road dust pollution of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn along Islamabad expressway, Pakistan. Microchem. J. 2009, 92, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nawaz, A.; Khurshid, K.; Arif, M.S.; Ranjha, A.M. Accumulation of heavy metals in soil and rice plants (Oryza sativa L) irrigated with industrial effluents. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2006, 8, 391–393. [Google Scholar]
  17. Karishna, A.K.; Govil, P.K. Heavy metal distribution and contamination in soils of Thane-Belapur industrial development area, Mumbai, Western India. Environ. Geol. 2005, 47, 1054–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fagliano, J.A.; Savrin, J.; Udasin, I.; Gochfeld, M. Community exposure and medical screening near chromium waste sites in New Jersey. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 1997, 26, S13–S22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. DalCorso, G.; Farinati, S.; Furini, A. Regulatory networks of cadmium stress in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5, 663–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ali, M.A.; Naveed, M.; Mustafa, A.; Abbas, A. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Rhizosphere Microbiome. In Probiotics and Plant Health; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 253–290. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Cadmium stress tolerance in crop plants: Probing the role of sulfur. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ghani, A. Effect of chromium toxicity on growth, chlorophyll and some mineral nutrients of Brassica juncea L. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. 2011, 2, 9–15. [Google Scholar]
  23. Eick, M.J.; Peak, J.D.; Brady, P.V.; Pesek, J.D. Kinetics of lead adsorption/desorption on goethite: Residence time effect. Soil Sci. 1999, 164, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Salam, A.; Bashir, S.; Khan, I.; Hussain, Q.; Gao, R.; Hu, H. Biochar induced Pb and Cu immobilization, Phytoavailability attenuation in Chinese cabbage, and improved biochemical properties in naturally co-contaminated soil. J. Soils Sediments 2019, 19, 2381–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hou, D.; Ding, Z.; Li, G.; Wu, L.; Hu, P.; Guo, G.; Wang, X.; Ma, Y.; O’Connor, D.; Wang, X. A sustainability assessment framework for agricultural land remediation in China. Land Degrad. Dev. 2017, 29, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Quartacci, M.F.; Argilla, A.; Baker, A.J.M.; Navari-Izzo, F. Phytoextraction of metals from a multiply contaminated soil by Indian mustard. Chemosphere 2006, 63, 918–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Barcelo, J.; Poschenrieder, C. Phytoremediation: Principles and perspectives. Contrib. Sci. 2003, 2, 333–344. [Google Scholar]
  28. Tiwari, S.; Lata, C. Heavy metal stress, signaling, and tolerance due to plant-associated microbes: An overview. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pramanik, K.; Mitra, S.; Sarkar, A.; Soren, T.; Maiti, T.K. Characterization of cadmium-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae MCC 3091 promoted rice seedling growth by alleviating phytotoxicity of cadmium. Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 24419–24437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ahmad, M.; Naseer, I.; Hussain, A.; Zahid, M.M.; Mustafa, A.; Hilger, T.H.; Ahmad, Z.Z.; Minggang, X. Appraising Endophyte–Plant Symbiosis for Improved Growth, Nodulation, Nitrogen Fixation and Abiotic Stress Tolerance: An Experimental Investigation with Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Agronomy 2019, 9, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Naveed, M.; Mustafa, A.; Azhar, S.Q.T.A.; Kamran, M.; Ahmad, Z.Z.; Núñez-Delgado, A. Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN and tree twigs derived biochar together retrieved Pb-induced growth, physiological and biochemical disturbances by minimizing its uptake and translocation in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 257, 109974. [Google Scholar]
  32. Pandey, S.; Ghosh, P.K.; Ghosh, S.; De, T.K.; Maiti, T.K. Role of heavy metal resistant Ochrobactrum sp. and Bacillus spp. strains in bioremediation of a rice cultivar and their PGPR like activities. J. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guo, J.; Chi, J. Effect of Cd-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobium on plant growth and Cd uptake by Lolium multiflorum lam. and Glycine max (L.) merr. in Cd-contaminated soil. Plant Soil. 2014, 375, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Moreira, H.; Marques, A.P.G.C.; Franco, A.R.; Rangel, A.O.; Castro, P.M. Phytomanagement of Cd-contaminated soils using maize (Zea mays L.) assisted by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 9742–9753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ahmad, I.; Akhtar, M.J.; Zahir, Z.A.; Naveed, M.; Mitter, B.; Sessitsch, A. Cadmium-tolerant bacteria induce metal stress tolerance in cereals. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 11054–11065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cocozza, C.; Trupiano, D.; Lustrato, G.; Alfano, G.; Vitullo, D.; Falasca, A.; Lomaglio, T.; De Felice, V.; Lima, G.; Ranalli, G.; et al. Challenging synergistic activity of poplar-bacteria association for the Cd phytostabilization. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 19546–19561. [Google Scholar]
  37. Singh, R.; Pathak, B.; Fulekar, M.H. Characterization of PGP traits by heavy metals tolerant Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus safensis strain isolated from rhizospheric zone of weed (Phyllanthus urinaria) and its efficiency in Cd and Pb removal. IJCMAS 2015, 4, 954–975. [Google Scholar]
  38. Prapagdee, B.; Khonsue, N. Bacterial-assisted cadmium phytoremediation by Ocimum gratissimum L. in polluted agricultural soil: A field trial experiment. Int. J. Environ. 2015, 12, 3843–3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Pandey, N.; Bhatt, R. Role of soil associated Exiguobacterium in reducing arsenic toxicity and promoting plant growth in Vigna radiata. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2016, 75, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kartik, V.P.; Jinal, H.N.; Amaresan, N. Characterization of cadmium-resistant bacteria for its potential in promoting plant growth and cadmium accumulation in Sesbania bispinosa root. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2016, 18, 1061–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Chen, Y.; Chao, Y.; Li, Y.; Lin, Q.; Bai, J.; Tang, L.; Wang, S.; Ying, R.; Qiu, R. Survival strategies of the plant-associated bacterium Enterobacter sp. strain EG16 under cadmium stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 1734–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Ahmad, I.; Akhtar, M.J.; Asghar, H.N.; Ghafoor, U.; Shahid, M. Differential effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on maize growth and cadmium uptake. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2016, 35, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, W.C.; Ye, Z.H.; Wong, M.H. Metal mobilization and production of short-chain organic acids by rhizosphere bacteria associated with a Cd/Zn hyperaccumulating plant Sedum alfredii. Plant Soil 2010, 326, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hoberg, E.; Marschner, P.; Lieberei, R. Organic acid exudation and pH changes by Gordonia sp. and Pseudomonas fluorescens grown with P adsorbed to goethite. J. Microbiol. Res. 2005, 160, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Venkatesh, N.M.; Vedaraman, N. Remediation of soil contaminated with copper using rhamnolipids produced from Pseudomonas aeruginosa MTCC 2297 using waste frying rice bran oil. Ann. Microbiol. 2012, 62, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ashraf, S.; Naveed, M.; Afzal, M.; Seleiman, M.F.; Al-Suhaibani, N.A.; Zahir, Z.A.; Mustafa, A.; Refay, Y.; Alhammad, B.A.; Ashraf, S.; et al. Unveiling the potential of novel macrophytes for the treatment of tannery effluent in vertical flow pilot constructed wetlands. Water 2020, 2, 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Rasheed, H.; Jaleel, F.; Nisar, M.F. Analyzing the status of heavy metals in irrigation water in suburban areas of Bahawalpur city, Pakistan. AEJAES 2014, 14, 732–738. [Google Scholar]
  48. Musa, J.J.; Ode, O.G.; Anijofor, S.C.; Adewumi, J.K. Quality evaluation of household wastewater for irrigation. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 2011, 15, 431–437. [Google Scholar]
  49. Iqbal, H.H.; Taseer, R.; Anwar, S.; Mumtaz, M.; Qadir, A.; Shahid, N. Human health risk assessment: Heavy metal contamination of vegetables in Bahawalpur, Pakistan. Bull. Environ. Stud. 2016, 1, 10–17. [Google Scholar]
  50. Salomons, W.; Forstner, U.; Mader, P. Heavy Metals: Problems and Solutions; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  51. Boyd, R.S. Heavy metal pollutants and chemical ecology: Exploring new frontiers. J. Chem. Ecol. 2010, 36, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Herawati, N.; Suzuki, S.; Hayashi, K.; Rivai, I.F.; Koyoma, H. Cadmium, copper and zinc levels in rice and soil of Japan, Indonesia and China by soil type. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2000, 64, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. He, Z.L.; Yang, X.E.; Stoffella, P.J. Trace elements in agro ecosystems and impacts on the environment. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2005, 19, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Athar, M.; Vohora, S.B. Heavy Metals and Environment; New Age International Limited: New Delhi, India, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  55. Lepp, N.W. Effect of Heavy Metal Pollution on Plants: Metals in the Environment; Pollution Monitoring Series; Applied Science Publishers, Department of Biology: Liverpool, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  56. Masindi, V.; Muedi, K.L. Environmental Contamination by Heavy Metals. In Heavy Metals; El-Din, H., Saleh, M., Aglan, R.F., Eds.; Intech Open: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Emamverdian, A.; Ding, Y.; Mokhberdoran, F.; Xie, Y. Heavy metal stress and some mechanisms of plant defense response. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 756120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hall, J.L. Cellular mechanisms for heavy metal detoxification and tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hauser, M.T. Molecular basis of natural variation and environmental control of trichome patterning. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Sharma, S.S.; Dietz, K.J. The significance of amino acids and amino acid-derived molecules in plant responses and adaptation to heavy metal stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 711–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Dalvi, A.A.; Bhalerao, S.A. Response of plants towards heavy metal toxicity: An overview of avoidance, tolerance and uptake mechanism. Ann. Plant Sci. 2013, 2, 362–368. [Google Scholar]
  62. Viehweger, K. How plants cope with heavy metals. Bot. Stud. 2014, 55, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. El-Esawi, M.A.; Germaine, K.; Bourke, P.; Malone, R. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of Brassica oleracea in Ireland. C. R. Biol. 2016, 339, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Vwioko, E.; Adinkwu, O.; El-Esawi, M.A. Comparative Physiological, Biochemical and Genetic Responses to Prolonged Waterlogging Stress in Okra and Maize Given Exogenous Ethylene Priming. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. El-Esawi, M.A.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Ali, H.M.; Alayafi, A.A.; Witczak, J.; Ahmad, M. Analysis of Genetic Variation and Enhancement of Salt Tolerance in French Pea (Pisum Sativum, L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. El-Esawi, M.A.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Ali, H.M.; Ahmad, M. Overexpression of AtWRKY30 Transcription Factor Enhances Heat and Drought Stress Tolerance in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genes 2019, 10, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. El-Esawi, M.A. Genetic diversity and evolution of Brassica genetic resources: From morphology to novel genomic technologies—A review. Plant Genet. Resour. 2017, 15, 388–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. John, R.; Ahmad, P.; Gadgil, K.; Sharma, S. Heavy metal toxicity: Effect on plant growth, biochemical parameters and metal accumulation by Brassica juncea L. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2009, 3, 65–76. [Google Scholar]
  69. Hameed, A.; Rasool, S.; Azooz, M.M.; Hossain, M.A.; Ahanger, M.A.; Ahmad, P. Heavy Metal Stress: Plant Responses and Signaling. In Plant Metal Interaction: Emerging Remediation Techniques; Ahmad, P., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 557–583. [Google Scholar]
  70. Chen, L.; Guo, Y.; Yang, L.; Wang, Q. Synergistic defensive mechanism of phytochelatins and antioxidative enzymes in Brassica chinensis L. against Cd stress. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2008, 53, 1503–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bundy, J.G.; Kille, P.; Liebeke, M.; Spurgeon, D.J. Metallothioneins may not be enough-the role of phytochelatins in invertebrate metal detoxification. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 885–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Zagorchev, L.; Seal, C.E.; Kranner, I.; Odjakova, M. A central role for thiols in plant tolerance to abiotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 7405–7432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Saba, H.; Jyoti, P.; Neha, S. Mycorrhizae and phytochelators as remedy in heavy metal contaminated land remediation. Int. J. Environ. Sci. 2013, 2, 74–78. [Google Scholar]
  74. Thangavel, P.; Long, S.; Minocha, R. Changes in phytochelatins and their biosynthetic intermediates in red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) cell suspension cultures under cadmium and zinc stress. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2007, 88, 201–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yurekli, F.; Kucukbay, Z. Synthesis of phytochelatins in Helianthus annuus is enhanced by cadmium nitrate. Acta Bot Croat. 2003, 62, 21–25. [Google Scholar]
  76. Heiss, S.; Wachter, A.; Bogs, J.; Cobbett, C.; Rausch, T. Phytochelatin synthase (PCS) protein is induced in Brassica juncea leaves after prolonged Cd exposure. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 1833–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Du, J.; Yang, J.L.; Li, C.H. Advances in metallotionein studies in forest trees. Plant Omics 2012, 5, 46–51. [Google Scholar]
  78. Yang, Z.; Chu, C. Towards Understanding Plant Response to Heavy Metal Stress. In Abiotic Stress in Plants-Mechanisms and Adaptations; InTech: Shanghai, China, 2011; pp. 59–78. [Google Scholar]
  79. Leszczyszyn, O.I.; Imam, H.T.; Blindauer, C.A. Diversity and distribution of plant metallothioneins: A review of structure, properties and functions. METAJS 2013, 5, 1146–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gohari, M.; Habib-Zadeh, A.R.; Khayat, M. Assessing the intensity of tolerance to lead and its effect on amount of protein and proline in root and aerial parts of two varieties of rape seed (Brassica napus L.). JBASR 2012, 2, 935–938. [Google Scholar]
  81. Peleg, Z.; Blumwald, E. Hormone balance and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Saharan, B.S.; Nehra, V. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: A critical review. LSMR 2011, 21, 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  83. Arshad, M.; Frankenberger, W.T.J. Ethylene: Agricultural Sources and Applications; Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  84. Ahmad, P.; Nabi, G.; Ashraf, M. Cadmium-induced oxidative damage in mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. & Coss.] plants can be alleviated by salicylic acid. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2011, 77, 36–44. [Google Scholar]
  85. Vardhini, B.V.; Anjum, N.A. Brassinosteroids make plant life easier under abiotic stresses mainly by modulating major components of antioxidant defense system. Front. Environ. Sci. 2015, 2, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Dar, T.A.; Uddin, M.; Khan, M.M.A.; Hakeem, K.R.; Jaleel, H. Jasmonates counter plant stress: A review. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 115, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ayvaz, M.; Koyuncu, M.; Guven, A.; Fagerstedt, K.V. Does boron affect hormone levels of barley cultivars? Eurasia J. Biosci. 2012, 6, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Atici, O.; Agar, G.; Battal, P. Changes in phytohormone contents in chickpea seeds germinating under lead or zinc stress. Biol. Plant 2005, 49, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Brien, J.A.O.; Benkova, E. Cytokinin cross-talking during biotic and abiotic stress responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Pospisilova, J. Participation of phytohormones in the stomatal regulation of gas exchange during water stress. Biol. Plant 2003, 46, 491–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hollenbach, B.; Schreiber, L.; Hartung, W.; Dietz, K.J. Cadmium leads to stimulated expression of the lipid transfer protein genes in barley: Implications for the involvement of lipid transfer proteins in wax assembly. Planta 1997, 203, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Bücker-Neto, L.; Paiva, A.L.S.; Machado, R.D.; Arenhart, R.A.; Margis-Pinheiro, M. Interactions between plant hormones and HMs responses. Genet. Mol. 2017, 40, 373–386. [Google Scholar]
  93. Kazan, K. Auxin and the integration of environmental signals into plant root development. Ann. Bot. 2013, 112, 1655–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Fahad, S.; Hussain, S.; Bano, A.; Saud, S.; Hassan, S.; Shan, D.; Khan, F.A.; Khan, F.; Chen, Y.T.; Wu, C.; et al. Potential role of phytohormones and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in abiotic stresses: Consequences for changing environment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 4907–4921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Upadhyaya, H.; Panda, S.K.; Bhattacharjee, M.K.; Dutta, S. Role of arbuscular mycorrhiza in heavy metal tolerance in plants: Prospects for phytoremediation. J. Phytol. 2010, 2, 16–27. [Google Scholar]
  96. Aloui, A.; Recorbet, G.; Robert, F.; Schoefs, B.; Bertrand, M.; Henry, C.; Gianinazzi-Pearson, V.; Dumas-Gaudot, E.; Aschi-Smiti, S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis elicits shoot proteome changes that are modified during cadmium stress alleviation in Medicago truncatula. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Solanki, R.; Dhankhar, R. Biochemical changes and adaptive strategies of plants under heavy metal stress. Biologia 2011, 66, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chen, T.M.; Gokhale, J.; Shofer, S.; Kuschner, W.G. Outdoor air pollution: Nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and carbon monoxide health effects. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2007, 333, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lajayer, A.B.; Ghorbanpour, M.; Nikabadi, S. HMs in contaminated environment: Destiny of secondary metabolite biosynthesis, oxidative status and phytoextraction in medicinal plants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 145, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Shahid, M.; Khalid, S.; Abbas, G.; Shahid, N.; Nadeem, M.; Sabir, M.; Aslam, M.; Dumat, C. Heavy Metal Stress and Crop Productivity. In Crop Production and Global Environmental Issues; Hakeem, K.R., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; 1025p. [Google Scholar]
  101. Choudhury, F.K.; Rivero, R.M.; Blumwald, E.; Mittler, R. Reactive oxygen species, abiotic stress and stress combination. Plant J. 2017, 90, 856–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Bradl, H.; Xenidis, A. Remediation techniques. Interface Sci. Technol. 2005, 6, 165–261. [Google Scholar]
  103. Ali, H.; Khan, E.; Sajad, M.A. Phytoremediation of heavy metals—Concepts and applications. Chemosphere 2013, 91, 869–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Schnoor, J. Phytoremediation; Technology Evaluation Report TE-98-01; Groundwater Remediation Technologies Analysis Center: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  105. Bashar, K.K.; Tareq, M.Z.; Amin, M.R.; Honi, U.; Tahjib-Ul-Arif, M.; Sadat, M.A.; Hossen, Q.M.M. Phytohormone-mediated stomatal response, escape and quiescence strategies in plants under flooding stress. Agronomy 2019, 9, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Sytar, O.; Kumari, P.; Yadav, S.; Brestic, M.; Rastogi, A. Phytohormone priming: Regulator for heavy metal stress in plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Sharma, P.; Bhardwaj, R. Effects of 24-epibrassino- lide on growth and metal uptake in Brassica juncea L. under copper metal stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2007, 29, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Choudhary, S.P.; Bhardwaj, R.; Gupta, B.D.; Dutt, P.; Gupta, R.K.; Biondi, S.; Kanwar, M. Epibrassinolide induces changes in indole-3-acetic acid, abscisic acid and polyamine concentrations and enhances anti-oxidant potential of radish seedlings under copper stress. Plant Physiol. 2010, 140, 280–296. [Google Scholar]
  109. Yadav, P.; Kaur, R.; Kanwar, M.K.; Sharma, A.; Verma, V.; Sirhindi, G.; Bhardwaj, R. Castasterone confers copper stress tolerance by regulating anti-oxidant enzyme responses, anti-oxidants, and amino acid balance in B. juncea seedlings. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 147, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Alam, M.M.; Hayat, S.; Ali, B.; Ahmad, A. Effect of 28-homobrassinolide treatment on nickel toxicity in Brassica juncea. Photosynthetica 2007, 45, 139–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Janeczko, A.; Kościelniak, J.; Pilipowicz, M.; Lukaszewska, S. Protection of winter rape photosystem 2 by 24-Epibrassinolide under cadmium stress. Photosynthetica 2005, 43, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Rady, M.M. Effect of 24-epibrassinolide on growth, yield, anti-oxidant system and cadmium content of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants under salinity and cadmium stress. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 129, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hasan, S.A.; Hayat, S.; Ali, B.; Ahmad, A. 28-Homo-brassinolide protects chickpea (Cicer arietinum) from cadmium toxicity by stimulating anti-oxidants. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 151, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Jan, S.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wijaya, L.; Alam, P.; Siddique, K.H.; Ahmad, P. Interactive effect of 24-epibrassinolide and silicon alleviates cadmium stress via the modulation of anti-oxidant defense and glyoxalase systems and macronutrient content in Pisum sativum L. seedlings. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kaur, R.; Yadav, P.; Sharma, A.; Kumar, T.A.; Kumar, V.; Kaur, K.S.; Bhardwaj, R. Castasterone and citric acid treatment restores photosynthetic attributes in Brassica juncea L. under Cd(II) toxicity. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 145, 466–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Kohli, S.K.; Handa, N.; Sharma, A.; Gautam, V.; Arora, S.; Bhardwaj, R.; Wijaya, L.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, P. Interaction of 24-epibrassinolide and salicylic acid regulates pigment contents, anti-oxidative defense responses, and gene expression in Brassica juncea L. seedlings under Pb stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 15159–15173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kohli, S.K.; Handa, N.; Sharma, A.; Kumar, V.; Kaur, P.; Bhardwaj, R. Synergistic effect of 24-epibrassinolide and salicylic acid on photosynthetic efficiency and gene expression in Brassica juncea L. under Pb stress. Turk. J. Biol. 2017, 41, 943–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Pavlu, J.; Novak, J.; Koukalova, V.; Luklova, M.; Brzobohaty, B.; Cerny, M. Cytokinin at the crossroads of abiotic stress signalling pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Tassi, E.; Pouget, J.; Petruzzelli, G.; Barbafieri, M. The effects of exogenous plant growth regulators in the phytoextraction of HMs. Chemosphere 2008, 71, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Piotrowska-Niczyporuk, A.; Bajguz, A.; Zambrzycka, E.; Godlewska-Żyłkiewicz, B. Phytohormones as regulators of HM biosorption and toxicity in green alga Chlorella vulgaris (Chlorophyceae). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 52, 52–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Cassina, L.; Tassi, E.; Morelli, E.; Giorgetti, L.; Remorini, D.; Chaney, R.L.; Barbafieri, M. Exogenous cytokinin treatments of an NI Hyper-Accumulator, Alyssum murale, grown in a serpentine soil: Implications for phytoextraction. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2011, 13, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Jalmi, S.K.; Bhagat, P.K.; Verma, D.; Noryang, S.; Tayyeba, S.; Singh, K.; Sharma, D.; Sinha, A.K. Traversing the links between heavy metal stress and plant signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ghori, N.H.; Ghori, T.; Hayat, M.Q.; Imadi, S.R.; Gul, A.; Altay, V.; Ozturk, M. Heavy metal stress and responses in plants. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 1807–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Fassler, E.; Evangelou, M.W.; Robinson, B.H.; Schulin, R. Effects of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) on sunflower growth and HM uptake in combination with ethylene diamine disuccinic acid (EDDS). Chemosphere 2010, 80, 901–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Hadi, F.; Bano, A.; Fuller, M.P. The improved phytoextraction of lead (Pb) and the growth of maize (Zea mays L.): The role of plant growth regulators (GA3 and IAA) and EDTA alone and in combinations. Chemosphere 2010, 80, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Aderholt, M.; Vogelien, D.L.; Koether, M.; Greipsson, S. Phytoextraction of contaminated urban soils by Panicum virgatum L. enhanced with application of a plant growth regulator (BAP) and citric acid. Chemosphere 2017, 175, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Bashri, G.; Prasad, S.M. Indole acetic acid modulates changes in growth, chlorophyll a fluorescence and anti-oxidant potential of Trigonella foenumgraecum L. grown under cadmium stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015, 37, 1745–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Srivastava, S.; Verma, P.C.; Chaudhary, V.; Singh, N.; Abhilash, P.C.; Kumar, K.V.; Sharma, N.; Singh, N. Inoculation of arsenic-resistant Staphylococcus arlettae on growth and arsenic uptake in Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. Var. R-46. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 262, 1039–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Gangwar, S.; Singh, V.P.; Srivastava, P.K.; Maurya, J.N. Modification of chromium (VI) phytotoxicity by exogenous gibberellic acid application in Pisum sativum (L.) seedlings. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2011, 33, 1385–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhu, X.F.; Jiang, T.; Wang, Z.W.; Lei, G.J.; Shi, Y.Z.; Li, G.X.; Zheng, S.J. Gibberellic acid alleviates cadmium toxicity by reducing nitric oxide accumulation and expression of IRT1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 239–240, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hadi, F.; Ali, N.; Ahmad, A. Enhanced phytoremediation of cadmium-contaminated soil by Parthenium hysterophorus plant: Effect of gibberellic acid (Ga3) and synthetic chelator, alone and in combinations. Bioremediat. J. 2014, 18, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wang, B.; Wei, H.; Xue, Z.; Zhang, W.H. Gibberellins regulate iron deficiency-response by influencing iron transport and translocation in rice seedlings (Oryza sativa). Ann. Bot. 2017, 119, 945–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Yan, Z.; Chen, J.; Li, X. Methyl jasmonate as modulator of Cd toxicity in Capsicum frutescens var. fasciculatum seedlings. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 98, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Per, T.S.; Khan, M.I.R.; Anjum, N.A.; Masood, A.; Hussain, S.J.; Khan, N.A. Jasmonates in plants under abiotic stresses: Crosstalk with other phytohormones matters. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 145, 104–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Belkhadi, A.; Hediji, H.; Abbes, Z.; Nouairi, I.; Barhoumi, Z.; Zarrouk, M.; Chaïbi, W.; Djebali, W. Effects of exogenous salicylic acid pre-treatment on cadmium toxicity and leaf lipid content in Linum usitatissimum L. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2010, 73, 1004–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Kazemi, N.; Khavari-Nejad, R.A.; Fahimi, H.; Saadatmand, S.; Nejad-Sattari, T. Effects of exogenous salicylic acid and nitric oxide on lipid peroxidation and anti-oxidant enzyme activities in leaves of Brassica napus L. under nickel stress. Sci. Hortic. 2010, 126, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Xu, L.L.; Fan, Z.Y.; Dong, Y.J.; Kong, J.; Bai, X.Y. Effects of exogenous salicylic acid and nitric oxide on physiological characteristics of two peanut cultivars under cadmium stress. Biol. Plant 2015, 59, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Xu, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Zhou, G. Response and adaptation of photosynthesis, respiration, and anti-oxidant systems to elevated CO2 with environmental stress in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Kohli, S.K.; Handa, N.; Sharma, A.; Gautam, V.; Arora, S.; Bhardwaj, R.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wijaya, L.; Ahmad, P. Combined effect of 24-epibrassinolide and salicylic acid mitigates lead (Pb) toxicity by modulating various metabolites in Brassica juncea L. seedlings. Protoplasma 2018, 255, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Kohli, K.S.; Handa, N.; Bali, S.; Arora, S.; Sharma, A.; Kaur, R.; Bhardwaj, R. Modulation of anti-oxidative defense expression and osmolyte content by co-application of 24-epibrassinolide and salicylic acid in Pb exposed Indian mustard plants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 147, 382–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Zhou, Z.S.; Guo, K.; Elbaz, A.A.; Yang, Z.M. Salicylic acid alleviates mercury toxicity by preventing oxidative stress in roots of Medicago sativa. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 65, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Drazic, G.; Mihailovic, N. Modification of cadmium toxicity in soybean seedlings by salicylic acid. Plant Sci. 2005, 168, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Khan, M.I.R.; Khan, N.A. Ethylene reverses photosynthetic inhibition by nickel and zinc in mustard through changes in PS II activity, photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency, and anti-oxidant metabolism. Protoplasma 2014, 251, 1007–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Khan, N.A.; Asgher, M.; Per, T.S.; Masood, A.; Fatma, M.; Khan, M.I. Ethylene potentiates sulfur-mediated reversal of cadmium inhibited photosynthetic responses in mustard. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Mendes, R.; Garbeva, P.; Raaijmakers, J.M. The rhizosphere microbiome: Significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 634–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Hashem, A.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Al-Huqail, A.A.; Wirth, S.; Egamberdieva, D. The interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and endophytic bacteria enhances plant growth of Acacia gerrardii under salt stress. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Egamberdieva, D.; Wirth, S.J.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Hashem, A. Phytohormones and beneficial microbes: Essential components for plants to balance stress and fitness. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Mustafa, A.; Naveed, M.; Saeed, Q.; Ashraf, M.N.; Hussain, A.; Abbas, T.; Kamran, M.; Minggang, X. Application Potentials of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria and Fungi as an Alternative to Conventional Weed Control Methods. In Crop Production; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  149. Cho, S.T.; Chang, H.H.; Egamberdieva, D.; Kamilova, F.; Lugtenberg, B.; Kuo, C.H. Genome Analysis of Pseudomonas fluorescens PCL1751: A rhizobacterium that controls root diseases and alleviates salt stress for its plant host. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0140231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Etesami, H.; Alikhani, H.A.; Hosseini, H.M. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production trait, a useful screening to select endophytic and rhizosphere competent bacteria for rice growth promoting agents. MethodsX 2015, 2, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Sorty, A.M.; Meena, K.K.; Choudhary, K.; Bitla, U.M.; Minhas, P.S.; Krishnani, K.K. Effect of plant growth promoting bacteria associated with halophytic weed (Psoralea corylifolia L.) on germination and seedling growth of wheat under saline conditions. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016, 180, 872–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Ashraf, M.A.; Hussain, I.; Rasheed, R.; Iqbal, M.; Riaz, M.; Arif, M.S. Advances in microbe-assisted reclamation of heavy metal contaminated soils over the last decade: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 198, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Carlos, M.H.J.; Stefani, P.V.Y.; Janette, A.M.; Melani, M.S.S.; Gabriela, P.O. Assessing the effects of heavy metals in ACC deaminase and IAA production on plant growth-promoting bacteria. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 188, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Seneviratne, M.; Gunaratne, S.; Bandara, T.; Weerasundara, L.; Rajakaruna, N.; Seneviratne, G.; Vithanage, M. Plant growh promotion by Bradyrhizobium japonicum under heavy metal stress. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2016, 105, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Hrynkiewicz, K.; Zloch, M.; Kowalkowski, T.; Baum, C.; Niedojadlo, K.; Buszewski, B. Strain-specific bioaccumulation and intracellular distribution of Cd+2 in bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere, ectomycorrhizae, and fruitbodies of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 3055–3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  156. Sgroy, V.; Cassán, F.; Masciarelli, O.; Del Papa, M.F.; Lagares, A.; Luna, V. Isolation and characterization of endophytic plant growth-promoting (PGPB) or stress homeostasis-regulating (PSHB) bacteria associated to the halophyte Prosopis strombulifera. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 85, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Egamberdieva, D.; Wirth, S.; Behrendt, U.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Berg, G. Biochar treatment resulted in a combined effect on soybean growth promotion and a shift in plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Mishra, J.; Singh, R.; Arora, N.K. Alleviation of heavy metal stress in plants and remediation of soil by rhizosphere microorganisms. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Janzen, R.A.; Rood, S.B.; Dormaar, J.F.; McGill, W.B. Azospirillum brasilense produces gibberellin in pure culture and on chemically-defined medium in co-culture on straw. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1992, 24, 1061–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Gutierrez-Manero, F.G.; Ramos-Solano, B.; Probanza, A.; Mehouachi, J.; Tadeo, F.R.; Talon, M. The plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus licheniformis produce high amounts of physiologically active gibberellins. Physiol. Plant. 2001, 111, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Kumar, A.; Patel, J.S.; Meena, V.S.; Ramteke, P.W. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Strategies to improve abiotic stresses under sustainable agriculture. J. Plant Nutr. 2019, 42, 1402–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Singh, V.; Maharshi, A.; Singh, D.P.; Upadhyay, R.S.; Sarma, B.K.; Singh, H.B. Role of Microbial Seed Priming and Microbial Phytohormone in Modulating Growth Promotion and Defense Responses in Plants. In Advances in Seed Priming; Rakshit, A., Singh, H., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 115–126. [Google Scholar]
  163. Mustapha, M.U.; Halimoon, N. Screening and isolation of heavy metal tolerant bacteria in industrial effluent. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2015, 30, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Mishra, S.K.; Khan, M.H.; Misra, S.; Dixit, V.K.; Khare, P.; Srivastava, S.; Chauhan, P.S. Characterisation of Pseudomonas spp. and Ochrobactrum sp. isolated from volcanic soil. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017, 110, 253–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Román-Ponce, B.; Reza-Vázquez, D.M.; Gutiérrez-Paredes, S.; María de Jesús, D.E.; Maldonado-Hernández, J.; Bahena-Osorio, Y.; Estrada-de los Santose, P.; Wang, T.; Vásquez-Murrieta, M.S. Plant growth-promoting traits in rhizobacteria of heavy metal-resistant plants and their effects on Brassica nigra seed germination. Pedosphere 2017, 27, 511–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Dąbrowska, G.; Hrynkiewicz, K.; Trejgell, A.; Baum, C. The effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on the phytoextraction of Cd and Zn by Brassica napus L. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2017, 19, 597–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Sheng, X.F.; Xia, J.J. Improvement of rape (Brassica napus) plant growth and cadmium uptake by cadmium-resistant bacteria. Chemosphere 2006, 64, 1036–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Weyens, N.; Beckers, B.; Schellingen, K.; Ceulemans, R.; Croes, S.; Janssen, J.; Haenen, S.; Witters, N.; Vangronsveld, J. Plant-associated bacteria and their role in the success or failure of metal phytoextraction projects: First observations of a field-related experiment. Microb. Biotechnol. 2013, 6, 288–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Sinha, S.; Mukherjee, S.K. Cadmium-induced siderophore production by a high Cd resistant bacteria strain relieved Cd-toxicity in plants through root colonization. Curr. Microbiol. 2008, 56, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Pereira, S.I.A.; Barbosa, L.; Castro, P.M.L. Rhizobacteria isolated from a metal-polluted area enhance plant growth in zinc and cadmium-contaminated soil. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 12, 2127–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Hassan, T.U.; Bano, A.; Naz, I. Alleviation of heavy metals toxicity by the application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and effects on wheat grown in saline sodic field. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2017, 19, 522–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Fatima, H.E.; Ahmed, A. Micro-remediation of chromium contaminated soils. Peer J. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Wang, X.; Fan, J.; Xing, Y.; Xu, G.; Wang, H.; Deng, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Li, P.; Li, Z. The Effects of Mulch and Nitrogen Fertilizer on the Soil Environment of Crop Plants. In Advances in Agronomy; Sparks, D.L., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  174. Wang, X.; Wang, G.; Guo, T.T.; Xing, Y.; Mo, F.; Wang, H.; Fan, J.; Zhang, F. Effects of plastic mulch and nitrogen fertilizer on the soil microbial community, enzymatic activity, and yield performance in a dryland maize cropping system. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Khan, W.U.; Ahmad, S.R.; Yasin, N.A.; Ali, A.; Ahmad, A.; Akram, W. Application of Bacillus megaterium MCR-8 improved phytoextraction and stress alleviation of nickel in Vinca rosea. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2017, 19, 813–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Hansda, A.; Kumar, V.; Anshumali. Cu-resistant Kocuria sp. CRB15: A potential PGPR isolated from the dry tailing of Rakha copper mine. 3 Biotech 2017, 7, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  177. Gontia-Mishra, I.; Sapre, S.; Sharma, A.; Tiwari, S. Alleviation of mercury toxicity in wheat by the interaction of mercury-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2016, 35, 1000–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Arora, K.; Sharma, S.; Monti, A. Bio-remediation of Pb and Cd polluted soils by switch grass: A case study in India. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2016, 18, 704–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Ma, Y.; Oliviera, R.S.; Nai, F.; Rajkumar, M.; Luo, Y.; Rocha, I.; Freitas, H. The hyperaccumulator Sedum plumbizincicola harbors metal-resistant endophytic bacteria that improve its phytoextraction capacity in multi-metal contaminated soil. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 156, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  180. Adediran, G.A.; Ngwenya, B.T.; Mosselmans, J.F.W.; Heal, K.V.; Harvie, B.A. Mechanism behind bacteria induced plant growth promotion and Zn accumulation in Brassica juncea. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 283, 490–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Chen, L.; Luo, S.; Li, X.; Wan, Y.; Chen, J.; Liu, C. Interaction of Cd hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. and functional endophyte Pseudomonas sp. Lk9 on soil heavy metals uptake. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 68, 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. He, H.; Ye, Z.; Yang, D.; Yan, J.; Xiao, L.; Zhong, T.; Yuan, M.; Cai, X.; Fang, Z.; Jing, Y. Characterization of endophytic Rahnella sp. JN6 from Polygonum pubescens and its potential in promoting growth and Cd, Pb, Zn uptake by Brassica napus. Chemosphere 2013, 90, 1960–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Srivastava, S.; Srivastava, A.K.; Suprasanna, P.; D’Souza, S.F. Identification and profiling of arsenic stress-induced microRNAs in Brassica juncea. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  184. Ma, Y.; Rajkumar, M.; Fritas, H. Inoculation of plant growth promoting bacterium Achromobacter xylosoxidans strain Ax10 for the improvement of copper phytoextraction by Brassica juncea. J. Environ. Manag. 2008, 90, 831–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Mechanisms used by phytohormone-producing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to improve crop productivity under heavy metal toxicity.
Figure 1. Mechanisms used by phytohormone-producing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to improve crop productivity under heavy metal toxicity.
Sustainability 12 09056 g001
Table 1. Application and potentials of phytohormone producing bacterial strains for improving plant growth under heavy metal stress.
Table 1. Application and potentials of phytohormone producing bacterial strains for improving plant growth under heavy metal stress.
Bacterial StrainsPlant Growth Promoting TraitsPlantsHeavy MetalsEffects on Plants and Metal UptakeReference
Enterobacter sp.IAA production, Cd tolerance, siderophore productionPeaCdInoculation retrieved metal-induced growth disturbance by minimizing metal uptake in mung bean[13]
Increase in growth parameters and xanthophyll, carotenoid, and chlorophyll content
Bacillus sp.Auxins production, phosphate solubilizationLens culinarisCrInoculation reduced the negative effects of Cr on plants, improved plant growth parameters [175]
Bacillus megaterium MCR−8IAA production, siderophore production, ACC deaminase activity, phosphate solubilization, Cd tolerance abilityVinca rosea L.NiInoculation improved plant growth, proline contents and total soluble protein under Ni amended media[176]
Enhanced the activity of antioxidant enzymes, i.e., APX, CAT, SOD, and POD under Ni stress
Increased the Ni phytoextraction from soil
Kocuria sp. CRB15IAA production, NH3 production, phosphate solubilization, tolerance to Cu stressBrassica nigraCuImproved root and shoot growth of Brassica nigra[177]
Decrease in toxic effect of Cu on plants
Klebsiella pneumoniae MCC 3091IAA production, siderophore production, ACC deaminase activity, phosphate solubilization, Cd tolerance abilityOryza sativaCdSignificant improvement in seed germination and root and shoot growth under Cd stress [29]
Improved the antioxidant SOD, MDA, and CAT activity
Significantly improved the chlorophyll contents, total protein, total sugar, proline, α-amylase, and protease activity
Reduced the ethylene production Cd uptake in rice seedlings
Klebsiella pneumoniae (HG 3);IAA production, siderophore production, NH3 production, exopolysaccharides secretion, ACC deaminase activity, phosphate solubilization, K and Zn solubilization, Hg-stress toleranceTriticum aestivumHgInoculation significantly improved the relative water contents and root and shoot growth of wheat plants [178]
Enterobacter ludwigii (HG 2)Malondialdehyde content, electrolyte leakage, and proline contents were also improved under mercury stress
AzospirillumIAA production, tolerance to Pb and Cd, phosphate solubilizationPanicum virgatumCd, PbInoculation increased the surface area, number of branches, root length, and root and shoot biomass[179]
Neutralized the soil pH
Prevented the Pb and Cd translocation to aerial parts
Bacillus, Klebsiella, Leifsonia and EnterobacterAuxin production, Cd-stress tolerance, phosphate solubilization, oxidase and catalase activity, EPS-productionZea maysCdSignificant increase in shoot and root growth, dry biomass under Cd-stress[42]
Inoculation significantly increased the membrane permeability and relative water contents in maize leaves
Helped in Cd extraction and stabilization
Pseudomonas putida (ATCC 39213)IAA production, ACC deaminase activityEruca sativaCdInoculation was more effective in improving root and shoot growth and chlorophyll contents at lower levels, while efficiency decreased at higher [7]
level, also lowered the proline contents in leaves
Inoculation increased the Cd uptake by E. sativa plants
Achromobacter sp. E4L5, Bacillus sp. E4S1, Bacillus sp. E1S2, Bacillus pumilus E2S2 and Stenotrophomonas sp. E1LIAA production, ACC deaminase activity, siderophore production, phosphorus solubilization, tolerance to heavy metalsSedum plumbizincicolaZn, Cd, PbHeavy metal-tolerant bacterial strains effectively colonized the roots of S. plumbizincicola plants in multimetal contaminated soils. [180]
Inoculation effectively improved the root and shoot growth and dry biomass of plants.
Increase in water-extractable Cd and Zn concentration in soil.
Enhanced the phytoextraction ability of S. plumbizincicola plants.
Rhizobium leguminosarumIAA production, siderophore production, phosphorus solubilizationBrassica junceaZnInoculation improved plant growth and Zn accumulation in Brassica juncea[181]
Zinc stored in the roots as Zn cysteine and Zn phytate
Induced metal resistance in plants through chelation of Zn
Pseudomonas sp. LK9Ability to produce low molecular weight organic acids, siderophore and biosurfactantsSolanum nigrumCu, Zn, CdInoculation improved the root and shoot growth and plant biomass of Solanum nigrum L.[182]
Significantly improved the Cu, Zn, and Cd uptake in aerial parts
Enhanced the P and Fe bioavailability in soil
Inoculation improved the bioavailability of Cu, Zn, and Cd in soil
Rahnella sp. JN6IAA production, ACC deaminase activity, phosphorus solubilization, tolerance to heavy metalsBrassica napusZn, Pb, CdInoculation significantly improved the plant growth and dry weights of roots and shoots[183]
Improved the uptake and accumulation of Zn, Pb, and Cd in roots and shoots
Effectively colonized the tissue interior of rape plants
Staphylococcus arlettaeIAA production, ACC deaminase activity, siderophore productionBrassica junceaAsInoculation with S. arlettae improved the growth and As uptake of Brassica juncea (L.)[184]
Significantly improved the plant biomass, chlorophyll, and protein contents in plants
Helped in phytostabilization of As by accumulating metal in roots
Achromobacter xylosoxidans strain Ax10IAA production, ACC deaminase activity, phosphorus solubilization, tolerance to heavy metalsBrassica junceaCuInoculation with A. xylosoxidans significantly improved the root and shoot growth and fresh and dry weight of B. juncea plants under Cu stress[184]
Improved the Cu uptake by plants and effectively sequestered the metal from soil
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nazli, F.; Mustafa, A.; Ahmad, M.; Hussain, A.; Jamil, M.; Wang, X.; Shakeel, Q.; Imtiaz, M.; El-Esawi, M.A. A Review on Practical Application and Potentials of Phytohormone-Producing Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria for Inducing Heavy Metal Tolerance in Crops. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9056. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219056

AMA Style

Nazli F, Mustafa A, Ahmad M, Hussain A, Jamil M, Wang X, Shakeel Q, Imtiaz M, El-Esawi MA. A Review on Practical Application and Potentials of Phytohormone-Producing Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria for Inducing Heavy Metal Tolerance in Crops. Sustainability. 2020; 12(21):9056. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nazli, Farheen, Adnan Mustafa, Maqshoof Ahmad, Azhar Hussain, Moazzam Jamil, Xiukang Wang, Qaiser Shakeel, Muhammad Imtiaz, and Mohamed A. El-Esawi. 2020. "A Review on Practical Application and Potentials of Phytohormone-Producing Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria for Inducing Heavy Metal Tolerance in Crops" Sustainability 12, no. 21: 9056. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219056

APA Style

Nazli, F., Mustafa, A., Ahmad, M., Hussain, A., Jamil, M., Wang, X., Shakeel, Q., Imtiaz, M., & El-Esawi, M. A. (2020). A Review on Practical Application and Potentials of Phytohormone-Producing Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria for Inducing Heavy Metal Tolerance in Crops. Sustainability, 12(21), 9056. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219056

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop