The Efforts towards and Challenges of Greece’s Post-Lignite Era: The Case of Megalopolis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. The Delignitisation Roller Coaster in Greece: An Old Car and a Steep Slope Ahead
3. Methodological Approach
- Step 1—Selection of Key Pillars: The Greek Government’s post-lignite master plan for the areas of Western Macedonia and Megalopolis provides the overall transition process for the phasing out of lignite 38. The plan is based on three main principles: (a) employment protection; (b) compensation of the socioeconomic impact of the transition; and (c) energy self-sufficiency of lignite areas and the country at large. In Megalopolis, the main focus is to attract productive investments and create sustainable jobs that will cover those lost by phasing out lignite. The just transition will open a new chapter to Megalopolis and will create new opportunities for the economy and the society, especially under the following pillars, according to the master plan:
- Clean energy: Emphasis is placed on the construction of photovoltaic parks, with expressed interest in the construction of ~0.5 GW units.
- Smart agricultural production: Development of intelligent livestock and animal feed units, aiming at the further development of the livestock capacity of the area. Development of smart agricultural units for the production of exportable products, with emphasis on alternative forms of cultivation (e.g., hydroponics), as they are more environmentally friendly while at the same time they create jobs with increased added value.
- Sustainable tourism: Original theme park of adventure, entertainment, and education with interest from an international entertainment company.
- Other (e.g., industry, technology, and education): Creation of a model pharmaceutical industry, with the aim of restarting the heavy industry in the Peloponnese; public investment, business parks, etc.
- Step 2—Desktop Analysis: The above-mentioned pillars for fair development and fair transition in Megalopolis are further analysed, based on desktop analysis. Specific data and pieces of information about the environmental, economic, and social state of Megalopolis, as well as the potential opportunities and barriers for realising a just transition away from fossil fuels, have been identified.
- Step 3—Stakeholders’ Identification: More than 18 experts and stakeholders (e.g., policy makers, financial institutions, project developers, and civil society) from the municipality of Megalopolis and the regional unit of Arcadia have been identified.
- Step 4—SWOT Analysis (first version): Following structured interviews with the experts and stakeholders, a first version of the SWOT analysis has been prepared. The aim is to identify and address the structural economic changes that should take place during the decarbonisation process. The main categories of the SWOT analysis are the following [45]:
- Strengths: The available resources and capacities of Megalopolis which can be used to achieve its objectives for fair development and fair transition.
- Weaknesses: Limitations, defects, and disadvantages in Megalopolis that will hinder the achieving of its goals. Similarly, to strengths, these are directly linked to the present situation, related to environment and organisation.
- Opportunities: Favourable factors or overlooked trends in Megalopolis that would facilitate the decarbonisation process and enhance the position of efficient energy consumption management and low-carbon energy technologies. These are triggered by the external factors which stem from society, markets, and policies.
- Threats: Any unfavourable situations and reactions to the process of phasing out coal that are potentially damaging to its strategy. This includes the barriers, constraints, or any external circumstances that may cause problems, difficulties, and delays.
- Step 5—Stakeholders’ Engagement: The preliminary outputs from the SWOT analysis were discussed during a teleconference with the experts and stakeholders. Therefore, discussions with experts in the field and stakeholders were important to intensify and enhance the initial SWOT analysis, validate the results, as well as identify solutions that are expected to have a significant contribution towards Megalopolis’ just energy transition.
- Step 6—SWOT Analysis (final version): Based on feedback from stakeholders’ engagement, the final table of SWOT analysis has been developed for Megalopolis.
4. Results
4.1. Strengths
4.1.1. All Pillars
4.1.2. Clean Energy
4.1.3. Smart Agricultural Production
4.1.4. Sustainable Tourism
4.1.5. Other
4.2. Weaknesses
4.2.1. All Pillars
4.2.2. Clean Energy
4.2.3. Smart Agricultural Production
4.2.4. Sustainable Tourism
4.2.5. Other
4.3. Opportunities
4.3.1. All Pillars
4.3.2. Clean Energy
4.3.3. Smart Agricultural Production
4.3.4. Sustainable Tourism
4.3.5. Other
4.4. Threats
4.4.1. All Pillars
4.4.2. Clean Energy
4.4.3. Smart Agricultural Production
4.4.4. Sustainable Tourism
4.4.5. Other
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Herring, S.C.; Christidis, N.; Hoell, A.; Hoerling, M.P.; Stott, P.A. Explaining extreme events of 2018 from a climate perspective. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2020, 101, S1–S128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Seneviratne, S.I.; Nicholls, N.; Easterling, D.; Goodess, C.M.; Kanae, S.; Kossin, J.; Luo, Y.; Marengo, J.; McInnes, K.; Rahimi, M.; et al. Changes in climate extremes and their impacts on the naturalphysical environment. In Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation; Field, C.B., Barros, V., Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Dokken, D.J., Ebi, K.L., Mastrandrea, M.D., Mach, K.J., Plattner, G.-K., Allen, S.K., et al., Eds.; A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 109–230. [Google Scholar]
- IPCC—Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. In Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 °C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty; Masson-Delmotte, V.P., Zhai, H.O., Pörtner, D., Roberts, J., Skea, P.R., Shukla, A., Pirani, W., Moufouma-Okia, C., Péan, R., Pidcock, S., et al., Eds.; World Meteorological Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018; p. 32. [Google Scholar]
- Michas, S.; Stavrakas, V.; Spyridaki, N.A.; Flamos, A. Identifying Research Priorities for the further development and deployment of Solar Photovoltaics. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 2019, 38, 276–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- IEA—International Energy Agency. Global Energy Review 2020; IEA: Paris, France, 2020; Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2020 (accessed on 10 November 2020).
- Bai, M.; Impraim, R.; Coates, T.; Flesch, T.; Trouvé, R.; van Grinsven, H.; Cao, Y.; Hill, J.; Chen, D. Lignite effects on NH3, N2O, CO2 and CH4 emissions during composting of manure. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ryberg, M.W.; Owsianiak, M.; Laurent, A.; Hauschild, M.Z. Power generation from chemically cleaned coals: Do environmental benefits of firing cleaner coal outweigh environmental burden of cleaning. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 2435–2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kapetaki, Z.; Ruiz Castello, P.; Armani, R.; Bodis, K.; Fahl, F.; Gonzalez Aparicio, I.; Jaeger-Waldau, A.; Lebedeva, N.; Pinedo Pascua, I.; Scarlat, N.; et al. Clean Energy Technologies in Coal Regions; Kapetaki, Z., Ed.; EUR 29895 EN; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Stanley, M.C.; Strongman, J.E.; Perks, R.B.; Nguyen, H.; Cunningham, W.; Schmillen, A.D.; Mccormick, M.S. Managing Coal Mine Closure: Achieving a Just Transition for All; World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- TRACER. Best Practice Report on Labour Markets, Social Issues and Tourism. Available online: https://tracer-h2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/D2.4_TRACER_Deliverable_final.pdf (accessed on 25 August 2020).
- Henry, F.; Valletta, R. Do extended unemployment benefits lengthen un-employment spells? Evidence from recent cycles in the U.S. labor market. J. Hum. Resour. 2015, 50, 873–909. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, X.; Ho, P. Is mining harmful or beneficial? A survey of local community perspectives in China. Extr. Ind. Soc. 2019, 6, 584–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bec, A.; Moyle, B.D.; McLennan, C.J. Drilling into community perceptions of coal seam gas in Roma, Australia. Extr. Ind. Soc. 2016, 3, 716–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Karasmanaki, E.; Ioannou, K.; Katsaounis, K.; Tsantopoulos, G. The attitude of the local community towards investments in lignite before transitioning to the post-lignite era: The case of Western Macedonia, Greece. Resour. Policy 2020, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stognief, N.; Walk, P.; Schöttker, O.; Oei, P.-Y. Economic Resilience of German Lignite Regions in Transition. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nikas, A.; Neofytou, H.; Karamaneas, A.; Koasidis, K.; Psarras, J. Sustainable and socially just transition to a post-lignite era in Greece: A multi-level perspective. Energy Sour. Part B Econ. Plan. Policy 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geels, F.W. Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions. Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory Cult. Soc. 2014, 31, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pavloudakis, F.; Roumpos, C.; Karlopoulos, E.; Koukouzas, N. Sustainable Rehabilitation of Surface Coal Mining Areas: The Case of Greek Lignite Mines. Energies 2020, 13, 3995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rentier, G.; Lelieveldt, H.; Kramer, G.J. Varieties of coal-fired power phase-out across Europe. Energy Policy 2019, 132, 620–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EURACOAL—European Association for Coal and Lignite. Annual Report 2019. European Association for Coal and Lignite, 2020. Available online: https://euracoal2.org/download/Public-Archive/Library/Annual-Reports/EURACOAL-Annual-Report-2019-rev03-WEB.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2020).
- Neofytou, H.; Nikas, A.; Doukas, H. Sustainable energy transition readiness: A multicriteria assessment index. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EURACOAL—European Association for Coal and Lignite. Eurostat Complete Energy Balances. Available online: https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do (accessed on 4 November 2020).
- Enerdata. Coal and Lignite Production. 2020. Available online: https://yearbook.enerdata.net/coal-lignite/coal-world-consumption-data.html (accessed on 4 October 2020).
- Koasidis, K.; Nikas, A.; Neofytou, H.; Karamaneas, A.; Gambhir, A.; Wachsmuth, J.; Doukas, H. The UK and German low-carbon industry transitions from a sectoral innovation and system failures perspective. Energies 2020, 13, 4994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antosiewicz, M.; Nikas, A.; Szpor, A.; Witajewski-Baltvilks, J.; Doukas, H. Pathways for the transition of the Polish power sector and associated risks. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2020, 35, 271–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agora Energiewende & Sandabag. The European Power Sector in 2019. Available online: https://www.agora-energiewende.de/en/publications/the-european-power-sector-in-2019/ (accessed on 24 September 2020).
- European Commission. Energy Union Package—Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank: A Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy; COM (2015) 80 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. The European Green Deal; COM (2019) 640 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing the Just Transition Fund; COM (2020) 22 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Kavouridis, K. Lignite industry in Greece within a world context: Mining, energy supply and environment. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 1257–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vlassopoulos, C. Persistent lignite dependency: The Greek energy sector under pressure. Energy Policy 2020, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- TRACER. Report on the Current Role of Coal Mining and Related Policies in the TRACER Target Regions. 2019. Available online: https://tracer-h2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/TRACER-D3.1_Report_final.pdf (accessed on 2 December 2020).
- The World Bank. A Road Map for a Managed Transition of Coal-Dependent Regions in Western Macedonia; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- IPTO—Independent Power Transmission Operator. Monthly Energy Report—2020. Available online: https://www.admie.gr/agora/enimerotika-deltia/miniaia-deltia-energeias (accessed on 5 December 2020).
- Roumpos, C.; Pavloudakis, F.; Liakoura, A.; Nalmpanti, D.; Arampatzis, K. Utilisation of lignite resources within the context of a changing electricity generation mix. In Proceedings of the 10th Jubilee International Brown Coal Mining Congress: “Brown Coal Today and in the Future”, Bełchatów, Poland, 16–18 April 2018; pp. 355–365. [Google Scholar]
- European Centra Bank. The implications of fiscal measures to address climate change. ECB Econ. Bull. 2020, 2. Available online: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/economic-bulletin/html/eb202002.en.html#toc19 (accessed on 16 December 2020).
- Stamtsis, G.; Doukas, H. Cooperation or localization in european capacity markets? A coalitional game over graph approach. Energies 2018, 11, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Government Committee SDAM. Just Transition Development Plan of Lignite Areas. 2020. Available online: https://www.sdam.gr/sites/default/files/consultation/Master_Plan_Public_Consultation_ENG.pdf (accessed on 6 October 2020).
- Hellenic Republic. National Energy and Climate Plan, Athens, Greece. 2019. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/el_final_necp_main_en.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2020).
- Spyridi, D.; Vlachokostas, C.; Michailidou, A.; Sioutas, C.; Moussiopoulos, N. Strategic planning for climate change mitigation and adaptation: The case of Greece. Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strateg. Manag. 2015, 7, 272–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stavrakas, V.; Papadelis, S.; Flamos, A. An agent-based model to simulate technology adoption quantifying behavioural uncertainty of consumers. Appl. Energy 2019, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michas, S.; Stavrakas, V.; Papadelis, S.; Flamos, A. A transdisciplinary modeling framework for the participatory design of dynamic adaptive policy pathways. Energy Policy 2020, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabaldón-Estevan, D.; Peñalvo-López, E.; Alfonso Solar, D. The Spanish Turn against Renewable Energy Development. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- IPTO—Independent Power Transmission Operator. Monthly Energy Reports—October 2020. Available online: www.admie.gr/sites/default/files/attached-files/type-file/2020/11/Energy_Report_202010_v1.pdf (accessed on 9 December 2020).
- DeCarb. Reference Case Study and SWOT Analysis Identifying the Most Advantageous Growth Areas in Relation to the Existing Workforce and Territorial Specificities in Order to Create Alternative to Coal-Driven Activities; Final Report; DeCarb—Supporting the Clean Energy Transition of Coal-Intensive EU Regions: Stara Zagora, Bulgaria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Hellenic Statistical Authority. Demographic and Social Characteristics of the Resident Population of Greece According to the 2011 Population-Housing Census Revision of 20/3/2014; Hellenic Statistical Authority: Piraeus, Greece, 2014.
- IPTO—Independent Power Transmission Operator. Monthly Energy Reports—December 2018. Available online: https://www.admie.gr/sites/default/files/attached-files/type-file/2020/04/Energy_Report_201812_v1.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2020).
- Greek Mining Enterprises Association. Lignite. 2020. Available online: https://www.sme.gr/ (accessed on 5 September 2020).
- Nikas, A.; Stavrakas, V.; Arsenopoulos, A.; Doukas, H.; Antosiewicz, M.; Witajewski-Baltvilks, J.; Flamos, A. Barriers to and consequences of a solar-based energy transition in Greece. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 2020, 35, 383–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Government Committee SDAM. Just Transition Development Plan—Current Situation and Prospects for Areas in Energy Transition in Greece. 2020. Available online: https://www.sdam.gr/sites/default/files/consultation/Current_situation_and_prospects_for_areas_in_energy_transition_in_Greece_EN.pdf (accessed on 2 December 2020).
- Barrett, J. “Worker Transition & Global Climate Change,” Pew Center on Global Climate Change. December 2001. Available online: https://www.c2es.org/document/worker-transition-global-climate-change/ (accessed on 16 December 2020).
- IDDRI. “Implementing Coal Transitions: Insights from Case Studies of Major Coal-Consuming Economies”. A Summary Report of the Coal Transitions Project. 2018. Available online: https://www.iddri.org/sites/default/files/PDF/Publications/Catalogue%20Iddri/Rapport/201809-Synthesis%20Report%20Iddri-COALTRANSITIONS-def.pdf (accessed on 16 December 2020).
- Alves Dias, P.; Kanellopoulos, K.; Medarac, H.; Kapetaki, Z.; Miranda Barbosa, E.; Shortall, R.; Czako, V.; Telsnig, T.; Vazquez Hernandez, C.; Lacal Arantegui, R.; et al. EU Coal Regions: Opportunities and Challenges Ahead; EUR 29292 EN; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- WWF Hellas. Roadmap of Post-Lignite Transition for the Western Macedonia. 2016. Available online: https://regionsbeyondcoal.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Roadmap_PostLignite_EN_FINAL-1.pdf (accessed on 5 September 2020).
- HEAL—Health and Environment Alliance. HEAL Briefing: Lignite Coal—Health Effects and Recommendations from the Health Sector. 2018. Available online: https://www.env-health.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/HEAL-Lignite-Briefing-en_web.pdf (accessed on 5 September 2020).
- Europe Beyond Coal Database. Available online: https://beyond-coal.eu/database/ (accessed on 9 December 2020).
- DeCarb. Needs Analysis Report on Environmental Restitution and Land Restoration in DeCarb Regions. Available online: https://www.interregeurope.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/tx_tevprojects/library/file_1580819578.pdf (accessed on 9 December 2020).
- European Commission. Statistical Factsheet Greece; DG Agri: Brussels, Belgium, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- National Bank of Greece. Unlocking the Potential of Greek Agro-Food Industry. 2015. Available online: https://www.nbg.gr/greek/the-group/press-office/e-spot/reports/Documents/Sectoral%20Report_Agriculture%202015.pdf (accessed on 2 September 2020).
- Deloitte. Value of Connectivity—Economic and Social Benefits of Expanding Internet Access. 2014. Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ie/Documents/TechnologyMediaCommunications/2014_uk_tmt_value_of_connectivity_deloitte_ireland.pdf (accessed on 9 December 2020).
- Ovezikoglou, P.; Aidonis, D.; Achillas, C.; Vlachokostas, C.; Bochtis, D. Sustainability Assessment of Investments Based on a Multiple Criteria Methodological Framework. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomson, H.; Bouzarovski, S. Addressing Energy Poverty in the European Union: European State of Play and Action; EU Energy Poverty Observatory (EPOV): Brussels, Belgium, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Spyridaki, N.A.; Stavrakas, V.; Dendramis, Y.; Flamos, A. Understanding technology ownership to reveal adoption trends for energy efficiency measures in the Greek residential sector. Energy Policy 2020, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anagnostopoulos, P.; Spyridaki, N.-A.; Flamos, A. A “New-Deal” for the Development of Photovoltaic Investments in Greece? A Parametric Techno-Economic Assessment. Energies 2017, 10, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arsenopoulos, A.; Marinakis, V.; Koasidis, K.; Stavrakaki, A.; Psarras, J. Assessing Resilience to Energy Poverty in Europe through a Multi-Criteria Analysis Framework. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Union. Directive (EU) 2019/944 on Common Rules for the Internal Market for Electricity and Amending Directive 2012/27/EU; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- European Union. Directive (EU) 2018/2001 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Vlachokostas, C. Smart buildings need smart consumers: The meet-in-the middle approach towards sustainable management of energy sources. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 2020, 39, 648–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marinakis, V. Big data for energy management and energy-efficient buildings. Energies 2020, 13, 1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- REScoop MECISE. Mobilising European Citizens to Invest in Sustainable Energy, Clean Energy for All Europeans, Final Results Oriented Report; REScoop MECISE: Berchem, Belgium, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Clean Energy for All Europeans; COM (2016) 860 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- European Union. Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council; Official Journal of the European Union (L 328/1); European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- ENEFIRST. Defining and Contextualizing the E1st Principle; Deliverable D2.1 Funded by the H2020 Programme; ENEFIRST: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Stavrakas, V.; Flamos, A. A modular high-resolution demand-side management model to quantify benefits of demand-flexibility in the residential sector. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Card, D.; Kluve, J.; Weber, A. What Works? A Meta Analysis of Recent Active Labor Market Program Evaluations; National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 21431; National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rose, C.D.; Chilvers, J. Agriculture 4.0: Broadening Responsible Innovation in an Era of Smart Farming. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2018, 2, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pierpaolia, E.; Carlia, G.; Pignattia, E.; Canavari, M. Drivers of precision agriculture technologies adoption: A literature review. Proc. Technol. 2013, 8, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Climate-Smart Agriculture Sourcebook. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Official Site. 2013. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/i3325e/i3325e.pdf (accessed on 4 December 2020).
- Vlachokostas, C. Closing the loop between energy production and waste management: A conceptual approach towards sustainable development. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC). GSTC Criteria Overview. Available online: https://www.gstcouncil.org/gstc-criteria/ (accessed on 3 December 2020).
- Hellenic Statistical Authority. Mean Yearly Unemployment Rate by NUTS3 Area; Hellenic Statistical Authority: Piraeus, Greece, 2020.
- Doukas, H.; Nikas, A.; Stamtsis, G.; Tsipouridis, I. The green versus green trap and away forward. Energies 2020, 13, 5473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sunlu, U. Environmental impacts of tourism. In Local Resources and Global Trades: Environments and Agriculture in the Mediterranean Region; Camarda, D., Grassini, L., Eds.; CIHEAM: Bari, Italy, 2003; pp. 263–270. [Google Scholar]
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2028 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Decommissioning | Amyntaio 1 & 2 | Kardia 3 & 4 | Agios Dimitrios 1–4 | Megalopoli 4 | Ptolemaida 5 |
−0.55 GW | −0.56 GW | −1.1 GW | −0.26 GW | −0.61 GW | |
(closed) | Megalopoli 3 | Meliti 1 | (conversion for use with different fuel) | ||
−0.25 GW | −0.29 GW | ||||
Agios Dimitrios 5 | |||||
−0.34 GW | |||||
Commissioning | Ptolemaida 5 | ||||
+0.61 GW |
Pillars | Strengths of Megalopolis | Weaknesses of Megalopolis | Opportunities of Megalopolis | Threats to Megalopolis |
---|---|---|---|---|
All pillars |
|
|
|
|
Clean energy |
|
|
|
|
Smart agricultural production |
|
|
|
|
Sustainable tourism |
|
|
|
|
Other (e.g., industry, technology and education) |
|
|
|
|
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Marinakis, V.; Flamos, A.; Stamtsis, G.; Georgizas, I.; Maniatis, Y.; Doukas, H. The Efforts towards and Challenges of Greece’s Post-Lignite Era: The Case of Megalopolis. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410575
Marinakis V, Flamos A, Stamtsis G, Georgizas I, Maniatis Y, Doukas H. The Efforts towards and Challenges of Greece’s Post-Lignite Era: The Case of Megalopolis. Sustainability. 2020; 12(24):10575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410575
Chicago/Turabian StyleMarinakis, Vangelis, Alexandros Flamos, Giorgos Stamtsis, Ioannis Georgizas, Yannis Maniatis, and Haris Doukas. 2020. "The Efforts towards and Challenges of Greece’s Post-Lignite Era: The Case of Megalopolis" Sustainability 12, no. 24: 10575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410575
APA StyleMarinakis, V., Flamos, A., Stamtsis, G., Georgizas, I., Maniatis, Y., & Doukas, H. (2020). The Efforts towards and Challenges of Greece’s Post-Lignite Era: The Case of Megalopolis. Sustainability, 12(24), 10575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410575