Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- RQ1: What are the characteristics of scientific literature—authors, journals, sources— related to environmentally sustainable solutions for urban LM deliveries on the e-commerce market?
- RQ2: What are key research areas and trends in the field of environmentally sustainable solutions for urban LM deliveries on the e-commerce market?
- RQ3: What are the literature and research gaps related to environmentally sustainable solutions and tools for urban LM deliveries on the e-commerce market?
2. Literature Background
3. Methodology
- RQ1: What are the characteristics of scientific literature—authors, journals, sources—related to environmentally sustainable solutions of urban LM deliveries on the e-commerce market?
- RQ2: What are key research areas and trends in the field of environmentally sustainable solutions for urban LM deliveries on the e-commerce market?
- RQ3: What are the literature and research gaps related to environmentally sustainable solutions and tools for urban LM deliveries on the e-commerce market?
- The first step was to obtain a set of research papers from the accessed databases based on the selected criteria. Scopus and the Web of Science (WOS) databases were selected, and the list of keywords and their synonyms was created.
- Secondly, the titles and abstracts were read to exclude irrelevant papers, followed by a full-text analysis. As a result of cross-reference, an additional set of articles was added to the analyzed collection.
- In the following step, the bibliographic network visualization was performed using the VOSviewer application, enabling the analysis in terms of collaboration of the authors, graphical distribution, and keyword co-occurrence.
- Furthermore, in the fourth step, the main research topic and the existing environmentally friendly e-commerce last-mile delivery solutions were identified, emerging trends and research gaps were indicated, and opportunities for further research were indicated.
4. Descriptive Analysis
5. Bibliographic Analysis
- Cluster 1: Bektas T., Cherrett T., Friday A., Piotrowska M.;
- Cluster 2: Iwan S., Kijewska K., Thomson R.G.;
- Cluster 3: Allen J., Browne M.;
- Cluster 4: Gatta V.;
- Cluster 5: Macharis C.;
- Cluster 6: Wang X.
- Cluster 1: carbon emission, commerce, delivery, electric vehicles, emissions, freight transportations, green logistics, impact, last-mile delivery, optimization, supply chain, sustainability, transportation, urban area, vehicle-routing problem;
- Cluster 2: behavior, city logistics, deliveries, goods, impacts, management, stakeholders, transport, urban freight transport;
- Cluster 3: e-commerce, electronic commerce, home delivery, last mile, last-mile delivery, supply chain management, urban logistics;
- Cluster 4: crowd logistics, crowdshipping, freight transport, mobility, sustainable development, urban freight, urban transport;
- Cluster 5: cargo bikes, cost efficiency, environmental impacts, vehicles.
6. Discussion and Direction for Further Research
- Crowdshipping within the scope of e-commerce last-mile deliveries
- 2.
- Customer behavior
- 3.
- ICT and smart solutions
- 4.
- Performance assessment
- 5.
- Green vehicles
7. Conclusions and Limitations
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- United Nations. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Cavailhès, J.; Gaigné, C.; Tabuchi, T.; Thisse, J.-F. Trade and the Structure of Cities. J. Urban Econ. 2007, 62, 383–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gevaers, R.; Van de Voorde, E.; Vanelslander, T. Cost Modelling and Simulation of Last-Mile Characteristics in an Innovative B2C Supply Chain Environment with Implications on Urban Areas and Cities. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 125, 398–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zwass, V. E-Commerce. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/technology/e-commerce (accessed on 14 January 2021).
- History of Ecommerce. Available online: https://www.ecommerce-land.com/history_ecommerce.html (accessed on 14 January 2021).
- World Internet Users Statistics and 2020 World Population Stats. Available online: https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm (accessed on 15 January 2021).
- Rotar, A. ECommerce Report 2020 Statista Digital Market Outlook—Market Report. 2019. Available online: https://www.statista.com/study/42335/ecommerce-report/ (accessed on 24 May 2021).
- Ali, F. [Infographic] Ecommerce vs Retail Sales from 2007–2020. Available online: https://www.digitalcommerce360.com/article/e-commerce-sales-retail-sales-ten-year-review/ (accessed on 13 February 2021).
- World Economic Forum. The Future of the Last-Mile Ecosystem; World Economic Forum: Cologny/Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Clement, J. COVID-19 Impact Retail E-Commerce Site Traffic 2020. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1112595/covid-19-impact-retail-e-commerce-site-traffic-global/ (accessed on 13 February 2021).
- Edwards, J.B.; McKinnon, A.C. Shopping Trip or Home Delivery: Which Has the Smaller Carbon Footprint ? Successful Home Delivery Compares Favourably with Conventional. Logist. Transp. Focus 2009, 11, 20–24. [Google Scholar]
- Edwards, J.B.; McKinnon, A.C.; Cullinane, S.L. Comparative Analysis of the Carbon Footprints of Conventional and Online Retailing. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2010, 40, 103–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karakikes, I.; Nathanail, E.; Savrasovs, M. Techniques for Smart Urban Logistics Solutions’ Simulation: A Systematic Review. In Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication. RelStat 2018. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 68, pp. 551–561. [Google Scholar]
- Lagorio, A.; Pinto, R.; Golini, R. Research in Urban Logistics: A Systematic Literature Review. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2016, 46, 908–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evangelista, P.; Santoro, L.; Thomas, A. Environmental Sustainability in Third-Party Logistics Service Providers: A Systematic Literature Review from 2000–2016. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Marchet, G.; Melacini, M.; Perotti, S. Environmental Sustainability in Logistics and Freight Transportation. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2014, 25, 775–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranieri, L.; Digiesi, S.; Silvestri, B.; Roccotelli, M. A Review of Last Mile Logistics Innovations in an Externalities Cost Reduction Vision. Sustainability 2018, 10, 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mangiaracina, R.; Marchet, G.; Perotti, S.; Tumino, A. A Review of the Environmental Implications of B2C E-Commerce: A Logistics Perspective. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2015, 45, 565–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Commission on Environment and Development. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future; World Commission on Environment and Development: Nairobi, Kenia, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Thomsen, C. Sustainability (World Commission on Environment and Development Definition). In Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility; Idowu, S.O., Capaldi, N., Zu, L., Gupta, A., Das, Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 2358–2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aras, G.; Crowther, D. The Durable Corporation; Routledge: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purvis, B.; Mao, Y.; Robinson, D. Three Pillars of Sustainability: In Search of Conceptual Origins. Sustain. Sci. 2019, 14, 681–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- UNEP. Alarming Rise in Global Temperatures. Available online: https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/alarming-rise-global-temperatures (accessed on 13 February 2021).
- Bansal, P. Evolving Sustainably: A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Sustainable Development. Strateg. Manag. J. 2005, 26, 197–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yigitcanlar, T.; Kamruzzaman, M. Planning, Development and Management of Sustainable Cities: A Commentary from the Guest Editors. Sustainability 2015, 7, 14677–14688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, M.; Sun, M.; Bi, D.; Liu, T. Green Logistics Development Decision-Making: Factor Identification and Hierarchical Framework Construction. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 127897–127912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiwapat, N.; Pomsing, C.; Jomthong, P. Last Mile Delivery: Modes, Efficiencies, Sustainability, and Trends. In 2018 3rd IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering (ICITE); IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joong-Kun Cho, J.; Ozment, J.; Sink, H. Logistics Capability, Logistics Outsourcing and Firm Performance in an E-commerce Market. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2008, 38, 336–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalakota, R.; Whinston, A.B. Electronic Commerce: A Manager’s Guide; Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Wakid, S.; Barkley, J.; Skall, M. Object Retrieval and Access Management in Electronic Commerce. IEEE Commun. Mag. 1999, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Global Digital Overview-DataReportal-Global Digital Insights. Available online: https://datareportal.com/global-digital-overview (accessed on 15 January 2021).
- Taniguchi, E.; Thompson, R.G.; Yamada, T. New Opportunities and Challenges for City Logistics. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 12, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McKinnon, A.; Cullinane, S.; Browne, M.; Whiteing, A. (Eds.) Green Logistics. Improving the Environmental Sustainability of Logistics; Kogan Page Ltd.: London, UK; Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Visser, J.; Nemoto, T.; Browne, M. Home Delivery and the Impacts on Urban Freight Transport: A Review. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 125, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dolati Neghabadi, P.; Evrard Samuel, K.; Espinouse, M.-L. Systematic Literature Review on City Logistics: Overview, Classification and Analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 865–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cravioto, J.; Yamasue, E.; Okumura, H.; Ishihara, K.N. Road Transport Externalities in Mexico: Estimates and International Comparisons. Transp. Policy 2013, 30, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiba-Janiak, M. Logistics in the Cities’ Development Strategies; Publishing House of Wrocław University of Economics: Wrocław, Poland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Yuen, K.F.; Wang, X.; Ng, L.T.W.; Wong, Y.D. An Investigation of Customers’ Intention to Use Self-Collection Services for Last-Mile Delivery. Transp. Policy 2018, 66, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morganti, E.; Seidel, S.; Blanquart, C.; Dablanc, L.; Lenz, B. The Impact of E-Commerce on Final Deliveries: Alternative Parcel Delivery Services in France and Germany. Transp. Res. Procedia 2014, 4, 178–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- The Environmental Impact of E-Commerce 2020-Special Sales like Black Friday & Cyber Monday Burden the Environment Due to the Intense Amount of Packaging, Shipping & Delivery-ResearchAndMarkets.com. Available online: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200127005508/en/The-Environmental-Impact-of-E-Commerce-2020---Special-Sales-like-Black-Friday-Cyber-Monday-Burden-the-Environment-Due-to-the-Intense-Amount-of-Packaging-Shipping-Delivery---ResearchAndMarkets.com (accessed on 15 January 2021).
- González-Benito, J.; González-Benito, Ó. The Role of Stakeholder Pressure and Managerial Values in the Implementation of Environmental Logistics Practices. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2006, 44, 1353–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bansal, P.; Roth, K. Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness. Acad. Manag. J. 2000, 43, 717–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mingers, J.; Leydesdorff, L. A Review of Theory and Practice in Scientometrics. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2015, 246, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. Br. J. Manag. 2003, 14, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crossan, M.M.; Apaydin, M. A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J. Manag. Stud. 2010, 47, 1154–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borsatto, J.M.L.S.; Bazani, C.L. Green Innovation and Environmental Regulations: A Systematic Review of International Academic Works. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, R.M.; MacLennan, M.L.F.; Tiago, E.F. Interorganizational Cooperation and Eco-Innovation: A Literature Review. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 2020, 477–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; Mackenzie, S.B.; Bachrach, D.G.; Podsakoff, N.P. The Influence of Management Journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strateg. Manag. J. 2005, 26, 473–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schöder, D.; Ding, F.; Campos, J.K. The Impact of E-Commerce Development on Urban Logistics Sustainability. Open J. Soc. Sci. 2016, 4, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- The Paris Agreement|UNFCCC. Available online: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement (accessed on 15 January 2021).
- Browne, M.; Allen, J.; Nemoto, T.; Patier, D.; Visser, J. Reducing Social and Environmental Impacts of Urban Freight Transport: A Review of Some Major Cities. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 39, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buldeo Rai, H.; Verlinde, S.; Merckx, J.; Macharis, C. Crowd Logistics: An Opportunity for More Sustainable Urban Freight Transport? Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2017, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morganti, E.; Dablanc, L.; Fortin, F. Final Deliveries for Online Shopping: The Deployment of Pickup Point Networks in Urban and Suburban Areas. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2014, 11, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ducret, R. Parcel Deliveries and Urban Logistics: Changes and Challenges in the Courier Express and Parcel Sector in Europe-the French Case. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2014, 11, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schliwa, G.; Armitage, R.; Aziz, S.; Evans, J.; Rhoades, J. Sustainable City Logistics-Making Cargo Cycles Viable for Urban Freight Transport. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2015, 15, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tang, M.; Liao, H.; Wan, Z.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Rosen, M. Ten Years of Sustainability (2009 to 2018): A Bibliometric Overview. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jan van Eck, N.; Waltman, L.; van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L.; van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L.; Jan van Eck, N.; Waltman, L. VOSviewer Manual. Available online: https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.8.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2021).
- van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ros-McDonnell, L.; De-la-Fuente-Aragon, M.V.; Ros-McDonnell, D.; Cardós Carboneras, M. Designing an Environmental Zone in a Mediterranean City to Support City Logistics. Int. J. Prod. Manag. Eng. 2018, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aljohani, K.; Thompson, R. Stakeholder-Based Evaluation of the Most Suitable and Sustainable Delivery Fleet for Freight Consolidation Policies in the Inner-City Area. Sustainability 2018, 11, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oliveira, L.K.; Oliveira, R.L.; Sousa, L.T.; Caliari, I.D.; Nascimento, C.D. Analysis of Accessibility from Collection and Delivery Points: Towards the Sustainability of the e-Commerce Delivery. urbe. Rev. Bras. Gestão Urbana 2019, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Allen, J.; Bektaş, T.; Cherrett, T.; Friday, A.; McLeod, F.; Piecyk, M.; Piotrowska, M.; Austwick, M.Z. Enabling a Freight Traffic Controller for Collaborative Multidrop Urban Logistics. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2017, 2609, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben Rajesh, P.; Rajan, J.A. Sustainable Performance of Cargo Bikes to Improve the Delivery Time Using Traffic Simulation Model. FME Trans. 2020, 48, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aditjandra, P.T.P.T.; Galatioto, F.; Bell, M.C.M.C.; Zunder, T.H.T.H. Evaluating the Impacts of Urban Freight Traffic: Application of Micro-Simulation at a Large Establishment. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 2016, 16, 4–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pilati, F.; Zennaro, I.; Battini, D.; Persona, A. The Sustainable Parcel Delivery (SPD) Problem: Economic and Environmental Considerations for 3PLs. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 71880–71892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaller, M.; Pahwa, A. Evaluating the Environmental Impacts of Online Shopping: A Behavioral and Transportation Approach. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 80, 102223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siikavirta, H.; Punakivi, M.; Kärkkäinen, M.; Linnanen, L. Effects of E-Commerce on Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Case Study of Grocery Home Delivery in Finland. J. Ind. Ecol. 2008, 6, 83–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cullinane, S. From Bricks to Clicks: The Impact of Online Retailing on Transport and the Environment. Transp. Rev. 2009, 29, 759–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aktas, E.; Bloemhof, J.M.; Fransoo, J.C.; Günther, H.-O.; Jammernegg, W. Green Logistics Solutions. Flex. Serv. Manuf. J. 2018, 30, 363–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kin, B.; Ambra, T.; Verlinde, S.; Macharis, C. Tackling Fragmented Last Mile Deliveries to Nanostores by Utilizing Spare Transportation Capacity—A Simulation Study. Sustainability 2018, 10, 653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, S.; Wei, Z.; Huang, A. Location Selection of Urban Distribution Center with a Mathematical Modeling Approach Based on the Total Cost. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 61833–61842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rześny-Cieplińska, J.; Szmelter-Jarosz, A. Assessment of the Crowd Logistics Solutions—the Stakeholders’ Analysis Approach. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Muñoz-Villamizar, A.; Santos, J.; Montoya-Torres, J.R.; Jaca, C. Using OEE to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Urban Freight Transportation Systems: A Case Study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, 197, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paddeu, D.; Aditjandra, P. Shaping Urban Freight Systems via a Participatory Approach to Inform Policy-Making. Sustainability 2020, 12, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bi, K.; Yang, M.; Zhou, X.; Zahid, L.; Zhu, Y.; Sun, Z. Reducing Carbon Emissions from Collaborative Distribution: A Case Study of Urban Express in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 16215–16230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkis, J.; Meade, L.M.; Talluri, S. E-logistics and the Natural Environment. Supply Chain Manag. An Int. J. 2004, 9, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aurambout, J.-P.; Gkoumas, K.; Ciuffo, B. Last Mile Delivery by Drones: An Estimation of Viable Market Potential and Access to Citizens across European Cities. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2019, 11, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Büyüközkan, G.; Mukul, E. Evaluation of Smart City Logistics Solutions with Fuzzy MCDM Methods. Pamukkale Univ. J. Eng. Sci. 2019, 25, 1033–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Paskannaya, T.; Shaban, G. Innovations in Green Logistics in Smart Cities: USA and EU Experience. Mark. Manag. Innov. 2019, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.; Pham, H.T.; Kim, C.; Lee, K. A Study on Emissions from Drayage Trucks in the Port City-Focusing on the Port of Incheon. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lindholm, M. How Local Authority Decision Makers Address Freight Transport in the Urban Area. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 39, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oberhofer, P.; Dieplinger, M. Sustainability in the Transport and Logistics Sector: Lacking Environmental Measures. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2014, 23, 236–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cardenas, I.D.; Dewulf, W.; Vanelslander, T.; Smet, C.; Beckers, J. The E-Commerce Parcel Delivery Market and the Implications of Home B2C Deliveries vs Pick-up Points. Int. J. Transp. Econ. 2017, 44, 235–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, J.; Piecyk, M.; Piotrowska, M.; McLeod, F.; Cherrett, T.; Ghali, K.; Nguyen, T.; Bektas, T.; Bates, O.; Friday, A.; et al. Understanding the Impact of E-Commerce on Last-Mile Light Goods Vehicle Activity in Urban Areas: The Case of London. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2018, 61, 325–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bonilla, D. Urban Vans, e-Commerce and Road Freight Transport. Prod. Plan. Control 2016, 27, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russo, F.; Comi, A. Urban Freight Transport Planning towards Green Goals: Synthetic Environmental Evidence from Tested Results. Sustainability 2016, 8, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Le Pira, M.; Marcucci, E.; Gatta, V.; Ignaccolo, M.; Inturri, G.; Pluchino, A. Towards a Decision-Support Procedure to Foster Stakeholder Involvement and Acceptability of Urban Freight Transport Policies. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2017, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oskarbski, J.; Kaszubowski, D. Applying a Mesoscopic Transport Model to Analyse the Effects of Urban Freight Regulatory Measures on Transport Emissions-An Assessment. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van Duin, R.; Slabbekoorn, M.; Tavasszy, L.; Quak, H. Identifying Dominant Stakeholder Perspectives on Urban Freight Policies: A q-Analyis on Urban Consolidation Centres in the Netherlands. Transport 2018, 33, 867–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kijewska, K.; Jedlinski, M. The Concept of Urban Freight Transport Projects Durability and Its Assessment within the Framework of a Freight Quality Partnership. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fossheim, K.; Andersen, J. Plan for Sustainable Urban Logistics-Comparing between Scandinavian and UK Practices. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2017, 9, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, S.; Xu, J.; Shi, X.; Li, G.; Liu, D. Sustainable Distribution Organization Based on the Supply–Demand Coordination in Large Chinese Cities. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhou, L.; Baldacci, R.; Vigo, D.; Wang, X. A Multi-Depot Two-Echelon Vehicle Routing Problem with Delivery Options Arising in the Last Mile Distribution. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2018, 265, 765–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McDonald, N.; Yuan, Q.; Naumann, R. Urban Freight and Road Safety in the Era of E-Commerce. Traffic Inj. Prev. 2019, 20, 764–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Penazzi, S.; Accorsi, R.; Manzini, R. Planning Low Carbon Urban-Rural Ecosystems: An Integrated Transport Land-Use Model. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 235, 96–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, P.; Song, G.; Chen, D.; Duan, H.; Zhong, R. Characterizing the Generation and Spatial Patterns of Carbon Emissions from Urban Express Delivery Service in China. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2020, 80, 106336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazzarino, M.; Rubini, L. Smart Urban Planning: Evaluating Urban Logistics Performance of Innovative Solutions and Sustainable Policies in the Venice Lagoon—the Results of a Case Study. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Akeb, H.; Moncef, B.; Durand, B. Building a Collaborative Solution in Dense Urban City Settings to Enhance Parcel Delivery: An Effective Crowd Model in Paris. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2018, 119, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gatta, V.; Marcucci, E.; Nigro, M.; Patella, S.; Serafini, S. Public Transport-Based Crowdshipping for Sustainable City Logistics: Assessing Economic and Environmental Impacts. Sustainability 2018, 11, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Binetti, M.; Caggiani, L.; Camporeale, R.; Ottomanelli, M. A Sustainable Crowdsourced Delivery System to Foster Free-Floating Bike-Sharing. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gatta, V.; Marcucci, E.; Nigro, M.; Serafini, S. Sustainable Urban Freight Transport Adopting Public Transport-Based Crowdshipping for B2C Deliveries. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2019, 11, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Szmelter-Jarosz, A.; Rześny-Cieplińska, J. Priorities of Urban Transport System Stakeholders According to Crowd Logistics Solutions in City Areas. A Sustainability Perspective. Sustainability 2019, 12, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dai, Q.; Jia, H.; Liu, Y. Private Vehicle-Based Crowdshipping for Intercity Express Transportation: Feasibility Assessment. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2020, 16, 155014772090820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Iwan, S.; Kijewska, K.; Lemke, J. Analysis of Parcel Lockers’ Efficiency as the Last Mile Delivery Solution-the Results of the Research in Poland. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 12, 644–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- de Oliveira, L.K.; Morganti, E.; Dablanc, L.; de Oliveira, R.L. Analysis of the Potential Demand of Automated Delivery Stations for E-Commerce Deliveries in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Res. Transp. Econ. 2017, 65, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Deutsch, Y.; Golany, B. A Parcel Locker Network as a Solution to the Logistics Last Mile Problem. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnold, F.; Cardenas, I.; Sörensen, K.; Dewulf, W. Simulation of B2C E-Commerce Distribution in Antwerp Using Cargo Bikes and Delivery Points. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2018, 10, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perboli, G.; Rosano, M.; Saint-Guillain, M.; Rizzo, P. Simulation-Optimisation Framework for City Logistics: An Application on Multimodal Last-Mile Delivery. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 2018, 12, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alves, R.; Lima, R.S.; de Sena, D.C.; de Pinho, A.F.; Holguín-Veras, J.; da Silva Lima, R.; Custódio de Sena, D.; Ferreira de Pinho, A.; Holguín-Veras, J. Agent-Based Simulation Model for Evaluating Urban Freight Policy to E-Commerce. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Heshmati, S.; Verstichel, J.; Esprit, E.; Vanden Berghe, G. Alternative E-Commerce Delivery Policies. EURO J. Transp. Logist. 2019, 8, 217–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Wang, Q.; Susilo, Y.O. Assessing the Impacts of Collection-Delivery Points to Individual’s Activity-Travel Patterns: A Greener Last Mile Alternative? Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2019, 121, 84–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Z.; Haasis, H.-D. Integration of Urban Freight Innovations: Sustainable Inner-Urban Intermodal Transportation in the Retail/Postal Industry. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, X.; Wong, Y.D.; Teo, C.C.; Yuen, K.F.; Feng, X. The Four Facets of Self-Collection Service for e-Commerce Delivery: Conceptualisation and Latent Class Analysis of User Segments. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2020, 39, 100896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, S.; Luo, R.; Peng, X. A Probability Guided Evolutionary Algorithm for Multi-Objective Green Express Cabinet Assignment in Urban Last-Mile Logistics. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 3382–3404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regué, R.; Bristow, A.L. Appraising Freight Tram Schemes: A Case Study of Barcelona. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 2013, 13, 56–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faccio, M.; Gamberi, M. New City Logistics Paradigm: From the “Last Mile” to the “Last 50 Miles” Sustainable Distribution. Sustainability 2015, 7, 14873–14894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Taefi, T.T. Viability of Electric Vehicles in Combined Day and Night Delivery: A Total Cost of Ownership Example in Germany. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 2016, 16, 512–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wątróbski, J.; Małecki, K.; Kijewska, K.; Iwan, S.; Karczmarczyk, A.; Thompson, R. Multi-Criteria Analysis of Electric Vans for City Logistics. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Christensen, L.; Klauenberg, J.; Kveiborg, O.; Rudolph, C. Suitability of Commercial Transport for a Shift to Electric Mobility with Denmark and Germany as Use Cases. Res. Transp. Econ. 2017, 64, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Teoh, T.; Kunze, O.; Teo, C.-C.; Wong, Y. Decarbonisation of Urban Freight Transport Using Electric Vehicles and Opportunity Charging. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Morganti, E.; Browne, M. Technical and Operational Obstacles to the Adoption of Electric Vans in France and the UK: An Operator Perspective. Transp. Policy 2018, 63, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Staricco, L.; Vitale Brovarone, E. The Spatial Dimention of Cycle Logistics. TeMA-J. Land Use Mobil. Environ. 2016, 9, 174–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pitera, K.; Pokorny, P.; Kristensen, T.; Bjorgen, A. The Complexity of Planning for Goods Delivery in a Shared Urban Space: A Case Study Involving Cyclists and Trucks. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2017, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Potti, P.; Marinov, M.; Sweeney, E. A Simulation Study on the Potential of Moving Urban Freight by a Cross-City Railway Line. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- de Mello Bandeira, R.A.; Goes, G.V.; Schmitz Gonçalves, D.N.; Márcio de Almeida, D.A.; de Oliveira, C.M. Electric Vehicles in the Last Mile of Urban Freight Transportation: A Sustainability Assessment of Postal Deliveries in Rio de Janeiro-Brazil. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2019, 67, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muñoz-Villamizar, A.; Quintero-Araújo, C.L.; Montoya-Torres, J.R.; Faulin, J. Short- and Mid-Term Evaluation of the Use of Electric Vehicles in Urban Freight Transport Collaborative Networks: A Case Study. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2019, 22, 229–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tsakalidis, A.; Krause, J.; Julea, A.; Peduzzi, E.; Pisoni, E.; Thiel, C. Electric Light Commercial Vehicles: Are They the Sleeping Giant of Electromobility? Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 86, 102421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheth, M.; Butrina, P.; Goodchild, A.; McCormack, E. Measuring Delivery Route Cost Trade-Offs between Electric-Assist Cargo Bicycles and Delivery Trucks in Dense Urban Areas. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2019, 11, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gruber, J.; Narayanan, S. Travel Time Differences between Cargo Cycles and Cars in Commercial Transport Operations. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2019, 2673, 623–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dong, C.; Ma, R.; Yin, Y.; Shi, B.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y. Traffic Conflict Analysis of Motor Vehicles and Nonmotor Vehicles Based on Improved Cellular Automata. Math. Probl. Eng. 2020, 2020, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ouhader, H.; El Kyal, M. Combining Facility Location and Routing Decisions in Sustainable Urban Freight Distribution under Horizontal Collaboration: How Can Shippers Be Benefited? Math. Probl. Eng. 2017, 2017, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cárdenas, I.; Beckers, J.; Vanelslander, T. E-Commerce Last-Mile in Belgium: Developing an External Cost Delivery Index. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2017, 24, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escuin, D.; Millan, C.; Larrode, E. Modelization of Time-Dependent Urban Freight Problems by Using a Multiple Number of Distribution Centers. Netw. Spat. Econ. 2012, 12, 321–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cepolina, E.M.; Farina, A. A New Urban Freight Distribution Scheme and an Optimization Methodology for Reducing Its Overall Cost. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2015, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hwang, T.; Ouyang, Y. Urban Freight Truck Routing under Stochastic Congestion and Emission Considerations. Sustainability 2015, 7, 6610–6625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lin, J.; Chen, Q.; Kawamura, K. Sustainability SI: Logistics Cost and Environmental Impact Analyses of Urban Delivery Consolidation Strategies. Netw. Spat. Econ. 2016, 16, 227–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veličković, M.; Stojanović, Đ.; Nikoličić, S.; Maslarić, M. Different Urban Consolidation Centre Secenarios: Impact on External Costs of Last-Mile Deliveries. Transport 2018, 33, 948–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, D.; Wang, X.; Li, S.; Ni, N.; Zhang, Z. Joint Optimization of Green Vehicle Scheduling and Routing Problem with Time-Varying Speeds. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0192000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Grosso, R.; Muñuzuri, J.; Escudero-Santana, A.; Barbadilla-Martín, E. Mathematical Formulation and Comparison of Solution Approaches for the Vehicle Routing Problem with Access Time Windows. Complexity 2018, 2018, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xiong, F.; Gong, P.S.S.; Peng, Z.Q.Q.; Fan, J.F.F. Optimization of Urban Traffic Distribution Path under Quick Response Demand. Open House Int. 2018, 43, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Xiao, L. The Application of New Logistics Model in the Integration of Urban and Rural Areas. J. Adv. Oxid. Technol. 2018, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leyerer, M.; Sonneberg, M.-O.; Heumann, M.; Breitner, M.H.H. Decision Support for Sustainable and Resilience-Oriented Urban Parcel Delivery. EURO J. Decis. Process. 2019, 7, 267–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Guo, Z. On the Necessity and Effects of Considering Correlated Stochastic Speeds in Shortest Path Problems Under Sustainable Environments. Sustainability 2019, 12, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Björklund, M.; Simm, N. Roles and Perspectives When Estimating Energy and Environmental Potentials of Urban Consolidation. Energies 2019, 12, 4811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Raeesi, R.; Zografos, K.G. The Multi-Objective Steiner Pollution-Routing Problem on Congested Urban Road Networks. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 2019, 122, 457–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guerlain, C.; Renault, S.; Ferrero, F. Understanding Construction Logistics in Urban Areas and Lowering Its Environmental Impact: A Focus on Construction Consolidation Centres. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tirkolaee, E.B.; Hadian, S.; Weber, G.-W.; Mahdavi, I. A Robust Green Traffic-based Routing Problem for Perishable Products Distribution. Comput. Intell. 2020, 36, 80–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezende Amaral, R.; Šemanjski, I.; Gautama, S.; Aghezzaf, E.H. Urban Mobility and City Logistics-Trends and Case Study. Promet-Traffic Transp. 2018, 30, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liao, W.; Wang, T. A Novel Collaborative Optimization Model for Job Shop Production-Delivery Considering Time Window and Carbon Emission. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chiara, G.D.; Cheah, L.; Azevedo, C.L.; Ben-Akiva, M.E. A Policy-Sensitive Model of Parking Choice for Commercial Vehicles in Urban Areas. Transp. Sci. 2020, 54, 606–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matusiewicz, M. Towards Sustainable Urban Logistics: Creating Sustainable Urban Freight Transport on the Example of a Limited Accessibility Zone in Gdansk. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Otter, C.; Watzl, C.; Schwarz, D.; Priess, P. Towards Sustainable Logistics: Study of Alternative Delivery Facets. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2017, 4, 460–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bjørgen, A.; Bjerkan, K.Y.; Hjelkrem, O.A. E-Groceries: Sustainable Last Mile Distribution in City Planning. Res. Transp. Econ. 2019, 100805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buldeo Rai, H.; Mommens, K.; Verlinde, S.; Macharis, C. How Does Consumers’ Omnichannel Shopping Behaviour Translate into Travel and Transport Impacts? Case-Study of a Footwear Retailer in Belgium. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vakulenko, Y.; Shams, P.; Hellström, D.; Hjort, K. Service Innovation in E-Commerce Last Mile Delivery: Mapping the e-Customer Journey. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 101, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ignat, B.; Chankov, S. Do E-Commerce Customers Change Their Preferred Last-Mile Delivery Based on Its Sustainability Impact? Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2020, 31, 521–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Marco, A.; Mangano, G.; Zenezini, G. Classification and Benchmark of City Logistics Measures: An Empirical Analysis. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2018, 21, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brotcorne, L.; Perboli, G.; Rosano, M.; Wei, Q. A Managerial Analysis of Urban Parcel Delivery: A Lean Business Approach. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gomez-Marin, C.G.; Serna-Uran, C.A.; Arango-Serna, M.D.; Comi, A. Microsimulation-Based Collaboration Model for Urban Freight Transport. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 182853–182867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katsela, K.; Browne, M. Importance of the Stakeholders’ Interaction: Comparative, Longitudinal Study of Two City Logistics Initiatives. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Russo, F.; Comi, A. City Characteristics and Urban Goods Movements: A Way to Environmental Transportation System in a Sustainable City. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 39, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- TDM Encyclopedia. Online TDM Encyclopedia-Sustainable Transportation and TDM. Available online: https://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm67.htm (accessed on 15 January 2021).
- Russo, F.; Comi, A. Measures for Sustainable Freight Transportation at Urban Scale: Expected Goals and Tested Results in Europe. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 2011, 137, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russo, F.; Comi, A. A Classification of City Logistics Measures and Connected Impacts. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2010, 2, 6355–6365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD. Oslo Manual; OECD: Paris, France, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buldeo Rai, H.; Verlinde, S.; Macharis, C. City Logistics in an Omnichannel Environment. The Case of Brussels. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2019, 7, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lemke, J.; Iwan, S.; Korczak, J. Usability of the Parcel Lockers from the Customer Perspective – The Research in Polish Cities. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 16, 272–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, H. Feasibility Study of China’s Foreign Trade Transformation and Upgrading Mode Based on Maximum Flow Algorithm. Cluster Comput. 2019, 22, 14445–14450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wygonik, E.; Goodchild, A. Evaluating CO2 Emissions, Cost, and Service Quality Trade-Offs in an Urban Delivery System Case Study. IATSS Res. 2011, 35, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oliveira, L.; Nascimento, C.; de Sousa, P.; Resende, P.; Silva, G. Transport Service Provider Perception of Barriers and Urban Freight Policies in Brazil. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Velickovic, M.; Stojanovic, D.; Basaric, V. The Assessment of Pollutants Emissions within Sustainable Urban Freight Transport Development: The Case of Novi Sad. Therm. Sci. 2014, 18, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carotenuto, P.; Gastaldi, M.; Giordani, S.; Rossi, R.; Rabachin, A.; Salvatore, A. Comparison of Various Urban Distribution Systems Supporting E-Commerce. Point-to-Point vs Collection-Point-Based Deliveries. Transp. Res. Procedia 2018, 30, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, C.; Albergaria De Mello Bandeira, R.; Vasconcelos Goes, G.; Schmitz Gonçalves, D.; D’Agosto, M. Sustainable Vehicles-Based Alternatives in Last Mile Distribution of Urban Freight Transport: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Viu-Roig, M.; Alvarez-Palau, E.J.E.J. The Impact of E-Commerce-Related Last-Mile Logistics on Cities: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardenas, I.D.D.; Beckers, J. A Location Analysis of Pick-up Points Networks in Antwerp, Belgium. Int. J. Transp. Econ. 2018, 45, 557–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaszubowski, D. A Method for the Evaluation of Urban Freight Transport Models as a Tool for Improving the Delivery of Sustainable Urban Transport Policy. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stojanović, D.; Velickovic, M. The Impact of Freight Transport on Greenhouse Gases Emissions in Serbian Cities-the Case of Novi Sad. Metal. Int. 2012, 17, 196–201. [Google Scholar]
- Gray, R. Can We Afford the Environment?: A Reply to Walley and Whitehead (1994). Harv. Bus. Rev. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLeod, F.N.; Cherrett, T.J.; Bektas, T.; Allen, J.; Martinez-Sykora, A.; Lamas-Fernandez, C.; Bates, O.; Cheliotis, K.; Friday, A.; Piecyk, M.; et al. Quantifying Environmental and Financial Benefits of Using Porters and Cycle Couriers for Last-Mile Parcel Delivery. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blu Couriers. Available online: https://blucouriers.co.nz/ (accessed on 6 April 2021).
- Brettmo, A.; Williamsson, J. The Role of ‘Influencers’ as Drivers of a More Sustainable Urban Freight Sector. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Galkin, A.; Obolentseva, L.; Balandina, I.; Kush, E.; Karpenko, V.; Bajdor, P. Last-Mile Delivery for Consumer Driven Logistics. Transp. Res. Procedia 2019, 39, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossolov, A.; Lobashov, O.; Kopytkov, D.; Botsman, A.; Lyfenko, S. A Two-Echelon Green Supply Chain for Urban Delivery. Sci. Tech. 2019, 18, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- UNFCCC. Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1. Available online: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf (accessed on 30 January 2021).
- Santoro, H.; The United States Will Rejoin the Paris Agreement. What’s Next? Available online: https://www.audubon.org/news/the-united-states-will-rejoin-paris-agreement-whats-next (accessed on 30 January 2021).
Database | Scopus, WOS |
---|---|
The final number of papers analyzed in the review | 126 |
Analyzed fields | Title, Abstract, Keywords |
Search phrase | (green AND (city OR urban) AND logistic) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (green AND “city freight”) OR (green AN “urban freight”) TITLE-ABS-KEY (green AND “last mile”) OR (green AND delivery) TITLE-ABS-KEY (“e-commerce”) |
Language | English |
Source Type | Peer-reviewed journals |
Time interval | 1994–2020 |
Authors | Title | Journal | Times Cited |
---|---|---|---|
Edwards J, McKinnon A, Cullinane S, 2010 | Comparative analysis of the carbon footprints of conventional and online retailing: A “last mile” perspective | International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management (2010) 40(1–2) 103–123 | 114 |
Morganti E, Dablanc L, Fortin F, 2014 | Final deliveries for online shopping: The deployment of pickup point networks in urban and suburban areas | Research in Transportation Business and Management (2014) 11 23–31 | 95 |
Browne M, Allen J, Nemoto T, Patier D, Visser J, 2012 | Reducing social and environmental impacts of urban freight transport: A review of some major cities | Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences (2012) 39 19–33 | 94 |
Schliwa G, Armitage R, Aziz S, Evans J, Rhoades J, 2015 | Sustainable city logistics—Making cargo cycles viable for urban freight transport | Research in Transportation Business and Management (2015) 15 50–57 | 62 |
Mangiaracina R, Marchet G, Perotti S, Tumino A, 2015 | A review of the environmental implications of B2C e-commerce: a logistics perspective | International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management (2015) 45(6) 565–591 | 61 |
Gevaers R, Van de Voorde E, Vanelslander T, 2014 | Cost Modelling and Simulation of Last-mile Characteristics in an Innovative B2C Supply Chain Environment with Implications on Urban Areas and Cities | Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences (2014) 125 398–411 | 59 |
Sarkis S, Meade LM, Talluri S, 2004 | E-logistics and the natural environment | Supply Chain Management (2004) 9 (4) 303–312 | 59 |
Ducret R., 2014 | Parcel deliveries and urban logistics: Changes and challenges in the courier express and parcel sector in Europe—The French case | Research in Transportation Business and Management (2014) 11 15–22 | 51 |
Buldeo Rai H, Verlinde S, Merckx J, Macharis C, 2017 | Crowd logistics: an opportunity for more sustainable urban freight transport? | European Transport Research Review (2017) 9(3) | 51 |
Topic | Description of Topics | Years | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004–2010 | 2011–2015 | 2016–2018 | 2019–2020 | ||
ICT and smart solutions | Designing and implementing information and communication technology. Intelligent, smart systems provide innovative applications and services to make transport and traffic safer, better coordinated, and more efficient. | [76] | [15,32] | [77,78,79,80] | |
Stakeholders collaboration | Discusses the LM delivery from the point of view of collaborative transport and stakeholders’ involvement, i.e., freight quality partnerships. The topic also includes supply chain management issues. In addition, organizational logistic functions are included. | [76] | [51,54,55,81,82] | [15,59,62,64,69,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93] | [74,94,95,96,97] |
Crowdshipping | Delivering goods with the use of the crowd by sharing services and assets and for appropriate compensation. | [52,84,98,99] | [72,100,101,102,103] | ||
Alternative places of delivery | All places where people can pick up their online ordered shopping, either staffed or unstaffed, open 24 h or only at certain times, including parcel lockers. | [53] | [38,70,83,93,104,105,106,107,108] | [61,101,109,110,111,112,113] | |
Green vehicles | The use of vehicles powered by less polluting fuels such as electricity, hydrogen, or gas. Bike deliveries and using trams or trains for delivering goods. The topic also includes the use of passenger transport to deliver parcels. | [68] | [51,55,114,115] | [32,49,69,107,108,116,117,118,119,120,121,122] | [60,65,100,110,113,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130] |
Last-mile delivery optimization | Optimization of vehicle routing paths or fleets to reduce costs, times, and emissions and infrastructural solutions such enabling consolidation as urban distribution centers (UDC), urban consolidation centers (UCC), transit points (TP), or micro-hubs. | [3,51,131,132,133,134,135] | [69,70,84,89,93,136,137,138,139,140,141] | [128,142,143,144,145,146,147] | |
Access restrictions | Includes all solutions to limit traffic in urban areas, such as off-peak delivery, time windows, road pricing, limited traffic zones. | [51,133] | [52,87,105,138,148] | [110,149,150,151] | |
Consumer behavior | The topic includes analyses of customers’ shopping behavior and shopping trips, attitudes, and the attempts to model such behavior to make it more sustainable. | [12,68] | [38,152] | [66,113,150,153,154,155,156] | |
Performance assessment | Description of tools used for assessing efficiency such as benchmarking, KPIs, or comparisons evaluating which solution best fulfils the specified objectives. | [15,70,157] | [109,112,125,128,142,153,158,159] |
Topic | Literature Studies | Empirical Studies | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quantitative Research | Qualitative Research | Both | ||
ICT and smart solutions | [15,76,78] | [32,77,78,79,80] | ||
Stakeholders collaboration | [15,54,55,76,91] | [59,62,85,86,87,88,89,90,92,93,94,95,96] | [51,54,55,69,74,82,83,84,97] | [64,81] |
Crowd logistics | [72,99,101,102,103] | [52,84,98,100] | ||
Alternative places of delivery | [38,61,93,101,105,106,109,110,111,112,113,114] | [53,83,104,107,108] | [70] | |
Green vehicles | [49,55,125,128] | [32,60,65,68,110,112,118,119,120,125,127,128,129,130] | [49,51,55,69,100,107,108,116,121,122,123,124] | [115,117,126] |
Last mile Delivery optimization | [18,128] | [3,71,89,93,128,131,132,135,136,138,139,140,141,142,143,145,146,147] | [51,69,84,133,144] | [70,134,137] |
Access restrictions | [87,105,110,138,150,151] | [51,52,133,148] | [149] | |
Consumer behavior | [12,38,66,68,113,150,152,153,156] | [155] | [154] | |
Performance assessment | [15,125,128] | [109,112,125,128,142,153,157,158,159] | [70] |
Type of Innovative Solutions | Environmental Sustainability Solution in Last-Mile Deliveries in Urban Areas | Reference | Environmental Sustainability Issues | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reduction of Pollution | Reduction of Noise | Habitat Loss | |||
Product solution | Electric vehicles | [65,125,127] | x | x | |
Cargo-bikes | [55,63,128] | x | x | ||
Parcel lockers/pickup points | [61,104,112,166,172], | x | |||
Process solution | Public transport | [115,124,152] | x | x | |
Crowdshipping | [52,72,98,101,103] | x | x | ||
Customer behavior | [155,166] | x | x | ||
Organizational solution | Time windows | [84,138,149] | x | x | |
Urban distribution and consolidation centers | [60,64,137] | x | x | ||
Night deliveries/off-hours deliveries | [86,117] | x | |||
Vehicle routing optimization | [131,139,147] | x | x | x |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mucowska, M. Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5894. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115894
Mucowska M. Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review. Sustainability. 2021; 13(11):5894. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115894
Chicago/Turabian StyleMucowska, Magdalena. 2021. "Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review" Sustainability 13, no. 11: 5894. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115894
APA StyleMucowska, M. (2021). Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review. Sustainability, 13(11), 5894. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115894