How Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Can Uptake the Sustainable Development Goals through a Cluster Management Organization: A Case Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. The Role of Clusters in Promoting the SDGs:
2.2. Sustainable Management Tools Evaluation
- simplicity/user-friendliness;
- practicality/cost-effective;
- adaptability/flexibility;
- company tailored;
- locally focused;
- group and network-oriented.
2.3. Social Aspects of CMOs
3. Methodology
3.1. Basque Country Cluster Context: A CMO Case Study
3.2. A Framework Proposal
- how can my company be aligned with the SDGs?
- how can my company contribute to the fulfillment of the SDGs?
- how can my company deliver the most relevant goals identified?
- gain an overarching knowledge about the UN 2030 Agenda;
- assess their alignment with the SDGs and with respect to that of their peers; and prioritize initiatives to correctly deliver the SDGs.
- -
- The people (employees) category has been incorporated in the understanding that SMEs usually have a flatter organization structure and that the interpersonal relationships are considered critical [22,26], people (employees) being one of the most relevant stakeholders in SMEs, who ought to understand the concerns and interests of their employees in order to develop objectives and business strategies that they would support companies long term success.
- -
- The Production Process category has been created because the SMEs of the CMO studied are mostly manufacturing companies, and in a traditional industrial cluster, such as Habic, all issues related to productive processes become critical for SDG alignment [1], issues such as dealing with energy (SDG 7), raw materials (SDG 12), emissions (SDG 13), and biodiversity and ecosystems (SDG 15).
- -
- -
- The People (employees) category deals with SDGs 3, 5, 8, and 10;
- The Production Process category deals with SDGs 1, 12, 13, and 15;
- The Customers and Suppliers category deals with SDGs 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, and 16;
- and The Community (social) category deals with SDGs 4, 10, 11, and 16.
- SDGs 1 and 2 are included in SDG 10;
- SDGs 6 and 14 are included in SDG 12;
- and SDG 17 is included in all those SDGs in which alliances appear to contribute to the achievement of the UN 2030 Agenda.
3.3. Focus Group Analysis
- -
- applicability and usability of the online tool developed;
- -
- adequate length and time for completion of the questionnaire;
- -
- proofreading of the questionnaire for language clarity;
- -
- redundant or missing sustainability material issues in the questionnaire;
- -
- clarity and usability of the assessment reports issued.
4. Findings
Analysis of Results
- Simplicity/user-friendliness. Management tools must be simple and user-friendly [72], and they should include straightforward, simple, and clear guidelines for application and maintenance [45,73]. Lehi-ODS is constructed on a web-based platform, includes intuitive instructions for its application (a video-tutorial explains what the SDGs embrace, provides guidance step by step about the completion of Lehi-ODS and offers tips on how to make effective use of it, included as Supplementary Materials) [64], and contains only closed-ended questions to ease respondents’ interaction. Thus, during the tool construction two focus groups were organized with six participating SMEs with different business profiles and approaches to the SDGs to doublecheck simplicity and usability of the tool developed, adequate length, proofreading of the terminology employed, and overall presentation form of Lehi-ODS, to make it as accessible as possible for the SMEs.
- Practicality/cost-effective. The implementation of a management tool must fit within time, cost, and personnel constraints of SMEs [74]. Thus, sustainability management tools need more aggregate topics or indicators in response to a less complex structure of the SMEs [46]. In order to fit within the time constraint of the SMEs and their level of expertise on the SDGs, Lehi-ODS includes questionnaire: a short-version (less than 5 min for completion); and a long-version (approx. 25 min for completion). The short version aims to provide an introduction to the SDGs and give the company an overview of its alignment with them, while the long version offers the company deeper knowledge of their net contribution to the SDGs and that of their peers. Furthermore, as aforementioned, with the aim of making a hands-on and actionable management tool with a less complex structure for SME managers, Lehi-ODS has been structured in 4 different categories according to the key functional areas of the companies and which serve as a guide to walk them through the questionnaire. It is recommended that the tool be completed by a senior manager of the SME with a holistic view of the 4 key functional areas of the company. In terms of the investment for the SMEs, Lehi-ODS development has been financially supported by the Department of Economic Development of the Gipuzkoa Provincial Council of the Basque Country.
- Adaptability/flexibility. Tools must be adaptable, flexible, and take into consideration the informal business characteristics of SMEs, allowing for some tolerance of informal cultures and management structures [72,74,75]. Furthermore, management tools also must consider the human factor, both during the implementation and continued management [18,76]. Lehi-ODS is an online self-evaluation tool adapted to the furniture SMEs circumstances in almost every business context, allowing each SME to advance on SDG management process at its own speed. The tool allows the SME to save the different versions of the questionnaires undertaken and to track the progress over time of the company in relation to its contribution to the SDGs. Thus, upon completion of the questionnaire, an analytical part is included and an assessment report and a table are automatically generated. Companies’ SDG own alignment and with respect to that of their peers is categorized in descending levels in the assessment report, as follows:
- Strongly Aligned level indicates the good performance of the SME for SDG contribution;
- Aligned level indicates that the SME is on the right track for SDG contribution; and misaligned level indicates that the SME needs to take proactive action for SDG contribution.The objective of this measurement scale is to avoid a one-sided view of the SDGs by disclosing only the positive contributions, but to try to build a balanced picture of the company’s net contribution to the SDGs, which corresponds better with a holistic approach of sustainability management.
- Company-tailored. Sustainability management tools should address the circumstances of each individual enterprise [72,77]. In this case, Lehi-ODS is aimed at specific-industry SMEs and it has been conceptualized taking into account the overall challenges of the furniture industry as a whole, not the individual sustainability needs of each of the companies of the CMO value chain. We understand that sustainability management does not entail a one-size-fits-all approach, and an industry-oriented online tool already encompasses the specific needs and sustainability concerns of each individual enterprise. Lehi-ODS has been created with companies clustered in the same region and in the same industry, whereby key specific circumstances of the SMEs are met. For future development, however, an open-ended section could be incorporated in a subsequent version of Lehi-ODS, in which the companies could include their very specific circumstances in SDG-related issues.
- Locally focused. SMEs are heavily influenced by the local community and the social networks of their area of influence, hence SME-specific tools should consider the local circumstances, such as local ecosystems, local communities, and stakeholders [78,79]. Lehi-ODS is constructed aiming at furniture specific-industry SMEs ubicated in the geographically concentrated Basque region taking into account the local material issues and sustainability challenges affecting the SMEs. Furthermore, Lehi-ODS encourages SMEs to support local sustainable suppliers, take in employees from the region and collaborate with both the local community and with regional educational institutions. For example, one of the companies participating in the focus group has taken on a project to calculate the percentage of purchases sourced from local suppliers (SDG 10). As for the role of the stakeholders, their engagement is essential for companies to identify sustainability material issues, and to report in accordance to them. Companies which align reporting and communication with the SDGs speak in the same language as their stakeholders do [9,41], hence, industry-specific key stakeholders’ sustainability concerns have been incorporated into Lehi-ODS. One of the companies participating in the focus group has decided to develop a transparent communication plan for both internal and external stakeholders (SDG 16).
- Group and network-oriented. Management tools ought to encourage greater diffusion in SMEs by offering solutions to overcome the barriers they face when implementing sustainability management tools [4,39,78,79,80]. The cooperation of the participating SMEs in the process of constructing Lehi-ODS with the input of the SMEs to include their sustainability needs and concerns simplifies its implementation and usability, and the CMO becomes responsible for the commissioning and development of Lehi-ODS and its later dissemination among the participating SMEs. Thus, the assessment report provides the output by level of the industry as a whole, enabling the companies to benchmark their SDG contribution against that of their peers. Additionally, and aforementioned, the SMEs have participated in the selection of the SDGs to include in Lehi-ODS, which are most closely related to the characteristics and activities of the furniture industry and on which the industry could have a significant material impact. For instance, one of the companies participating in the focus group proposed to create a specific working group to reduce the consumption of sector-strategic raw materials and obtain them from sustainable and recycled sources (SDG 12).
5. Discussion and Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Szennay, A.; Szigeti, C.; Kovács, N.; Szabó, D.R. Through the blurry looking glass-SDGs in the GRI report. Resources 2019, 8, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nielsen, K.; Nielsen, M. Clusters in the Circular Economy: Building Partnerships for Sustainable Transitions of SMEs; Cluster Excellence Denmark. 2019. Available online: http://circularpp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Clusters-in-Circular-Economy.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2021).
- Ye, N.; Kueh, T.B.; Hou, L.; Liu, Y.; Yu, H. A bibliometric analysis of corporate social responsibility in sustainable development. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 272, 122679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations Global Compact. SDG Compass. 2015. Available online: http://SDGCompass.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/019104_SDG_Compass_Guide_2015.pdf (accessed on 6 December 2020).
- Rockström, J.; Sukhdev, P. A New Way of Viewing the Sustainable Development Goals. In How Food Connects All the SDGs; Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University: Stockholm, Sweden, 2016; Available online: https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/research-news/2016-06-14-how-food-connects-all-the-sdgs.html (accessed on 12 January 2021).
- United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld (accessed on 25 October 2020).
- Elkington, J. 25 Years Ago I Coined the Phrase “Triple Bottom Line”. Harvard Business Review. 2018. Available online: https://hbr.org/2018/06/25-years-ago-i-coined-the-phrase-triple-bottom-line-heres-why-im-giving-up-on-it (accessed on 20 January 2021).
- Frey, M.; Sabbatino, A. The role of the private sector in global sustainable development: The UN 2030 agenda. In Corporate Responsibility and Digital Communities; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2018; pp. 187–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kingo, L.; Mohin, T. Integrating the SDGs into Corporate Reporting: A Practical Guide. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and UN Global Compact. 2018. Available online: https://www.globalreporting.org/media/0sxj0ewa/gri_ungc_reporting-on-sdgs_practical_guide.pdf (accessed on 29 November 2020).
- Rubio-Mozos, E.; García-Muiña, F.E.; Fuentes-Moraleda, L. Rethinking 21st-century businesses: An approach to fourth sector SMEs in their transition to a sustainable model committed to SDGs. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Diez-Cañamero, B.; Bishara, T.; Otegi-Olaso, J.R.; Mínguez, R.; Fernández, J.M. Measurement of corporate social responsibility: A review of corporate sustainability indexes, rankings and ratings. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lu, J.; Lian, M.; Zhang, C.; Rong, D.; Guan, H.; Mazeikaite, K.; Streimikis, J. Assessment of corporate social responsibility by addressing sustainable development goals. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020, 28, 686–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verboven, H.; Vanherck, L. Sustainability management of SMEs and the UN sustainable development goals. Umwelt Wirtsch Forum 2016, 24, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, M.P.; Schaltegger, S. Two decades of sustainability management tools for SMEs: How far have we come? J. Small Bus. Manag. 2016, 54, 481–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations. Micro, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/observances/micro-small-medium-businesses-day (accessed on 12 January 2021).
- World Bank. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Finance. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/smefinance (accessed on 12 January 2021).
- Perényi, Á.; Losoncz, M. A systematic review of international entrepreneurship special issue articles. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, M.P. Sustainability management and small and medium-sized enterprises: Managers’ awareness and implementation of innovative tools. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2015, 22, 271–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bikefe, G.; Zubairu, U.; Araga, S.; Maitala, F.; Ediuku, E.; Anyebe, D. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) by small and medium enterprises (SMEs): A systematic review. Small Bus. Int. Rev. 2020, 4, 16–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Takalandze, L.; Mohammad, R.N. Implementing corporate social responsibility as a dynamic capability in recent modern agri-business SMES’ concerns. Fundam. Appl. Res. Pract. Lead. Sci. Sch. 2019, 31, 217–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Von Weltzien, H.H.; Shankar, D. How can SMEs in a cluster respond to global demands for corporate responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 101, 175–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Battaglia, M.; Bianchi, L.; Frey, M.; Iraldo, F. An innovative model to promote CSR among SMEs operating in industrial clusters: Evidence from an EU project. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2010, 17, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matten, D.; Moon, J. “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2008, 33, 404–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Patten, M.L.; Newhart, M. Understanding Research Methods: An Overview of the Essentials, 10th ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 174–176. [Google Scholar]
- Flyvbjerg, B. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual. Inq. 2006, 12, 219–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Russo, A.; Tencati, A. Formal vs. informal CSR strategies: An in-depth analysis of Italian micro, small, medium-sized, and large enterprises. Proc. Int. Assoc. Bus. Soc. 2007, 18, 245–250. [Google Scholar]
- Jenkins, H. A critique of conventional CSR theory: An SME perspective. J. Gen. Manag. 2004, 29, 37–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marshall, A. Principles of Economics, 8th ed.; Book IV; Macmillan Distribution: Basingstoke, UK, 1920; Chapter X; pp. 267–277. [Google Scholar]
- Porter, M. The Competitive Advantage of Nations; March–April 1990; Harvard Business Review: Brighton, MA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Porter, M. On Competition; Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, USA, 1998; p. 197. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Smart Guide to Cluster Policy. How to Support SME Policy from Structural Funds, Guidebook Series; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2016; pp. 9–14. [Google Scholar]
- Mudambi, R.; Mudambi, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Scalera, V. Global collaboration and the evolution of an industry cluster. In Proceedings of the 43rd AIB UK Conference, London, UK, 7–9 April 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Rosenthal, S.S.; Strange, W.C. Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2003, 85, 377–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cantwell, J. Clusters and Networks; The Economics of the Knowledge Driven Economy; University of Reading: Reading, UK, 1999; pp. 71–78. [Google Scholar]
- Daddi, T.; Iraldo, F. The effectiveness of cluster approach to improve environmental corporate performance in an industrial district of SMEs: A case study. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2016, 23, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Felzensztein, C.; Gimmon, E.; Deans, K. Coopetition in regional clusters: Keep calm and expect unexpected changes. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2018, 69, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laur, I.; Klofsten, M.; Bienkowska, D. Catching regional development dreams: A study of cluster initiatives as intermediaries. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2012, 20, 1909–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Secretariat for Cluster Analysis (ESCA). The Quality Label for Cluster Organisations. Available online: https://www.cluster-analysis.org/gold-label-new/processes-of-application-assessment-and-award/copy_of_IntroductiontoGOLDassessment.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2020).
- Jenkins, H. Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 2006, 67, 241–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verboven, H.; Vanherck, L. Sustainability as a management process for SMEs. Umwelt Wirtsch Forum 2015, 23, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perrini, F.; Tencati, A. Sustainability and stakeholder management: The need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2015, 15, 296–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations Global Compact. Business Reporting on the SDGs, Integrating the SDGs into Corporate Reporting: A Practical Guide; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 6–32. [Google Scholar]
- Pacto Mundial. Comunicado el PROGRESO 2019. Available online: https://www.pactomundial.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Comunicando-el-Progreso-2019___pdf (accessed on 13 December 2020).
- Pacto Mundial. Guía para las Pymes ante los ODS. Available online: https://www.pactomundial.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Gui%CC%81a-para-pymes-ante-los-ODS.pdf (accessed on 13 December 2020).
- Obra Social La Caixa. La Contribución de las Empresas Españolas a los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. Available online: https://obrasociallacaixa.org/documents/10280/825331/la_contribucion_de_las_empresas_espanolas_a_los_ods_segundo_informe_es.pdf/fc822707-259a-67e4-231a-76e3ffd6301b?t=1558968131327 (accessed on 12 February 2021).
- Borga, F.; Citterio, A.; Noci, G.; Pizzurno, E. Sustainability report in small enterprises: Case studies in Italian furniture companies. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moneva, J.M.; Hernández-Pajares, J. Corporate social responsibility performance and sustainability reporting in SMEs: An analysis of owner-managers’ perceptions. Inderscience 2018, 10, 405–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kucharska, W.; Kowalczyk, R. How to achieve sustainability? Employee’s point of view on company’s culture and CSR practice. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, 26, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, J.C.; Hakansson, H.; Johanson, J. Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. J. Mark. 1994, 58, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. Beyond GDP: Measuring Progress, True Wealth, and Well-Being. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/beyond_gdp/index_en.html (accessed on 20 January 2021).
- Wilson, J.R. Cluster policy resilience: New challenges for a mature policy. Int. J. Bus. Environ. 2019, 10, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindqvist, G.; Ketels, C.; Sölvell, Ö. The Cluster Initiative Greenbook 2.0; Ivory Tower Publishers: Stockholm, Sweden, 2013; pp. 39–40. [Google Scholar]
- Moodysson, J.; Trippl, M.; Zukauskaite, E. Policy learning and smat specialization: Balancing policy change and continuity for new regional industrial paths. Sci. Public Policy 2016, 44, 382–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, L.; Lämmer-Gamp, T.; Meier zu Köcker, G.; Christensen, T. Clusters are Individuals, New Findings from the Cluster Management and Cluster Programme Benchmarking; The Danish Ministry of Science Innovation and Higher Education: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2012; Volume 2, Available online: http://www.cluster-analysis.org/downloads/ClustersareIndividualsVolumeIIAnnex.pdf (accessed on 21 January 2021).
- Elola, A.; Valdaliso, J.M.; Franco, S.; López, S. Public policies and cluster life cycles: Insights from the Basque country experience. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2017, 25, 539–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aragon, C.; Aranguren, M.J.; Iturrioz, C.; Larrea, M.; Olarte, F.J. A New Step in Cluster Policy Evaluation in the Basque Country; Orkestra Working Paper Series in Territorial Competitiveness No. 2009-01; Orkestra: San Sebastián, Spain, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Ketels, C. European clusters. In Innovative City and Business Regions; Structural Change in Europe; Hagbarth Publications: Bollschwei, Germany, 2004; p. 3. [Google Scholar]
- Konstantynova, A. Basque country cluster policy: The road of 25 years. Reg. Stud. Reg. Sci. 2017, 4, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Freije, I. The role of cluster initiatives in strategic alliances: A view from the Basque country region. Harv. Deusto Bus. Res. 2015, 4, 2–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maza, X.; Aranguren, M.; Parrilli, M.; Wilson, J.; Vendrell-Herrero, F. Nested methodological approaches for cluster policy evaluation: An application to the Basque country. Reg. Stud. 2014, 48, 1547–1562. [Google Scholar]
- Infyde. Plan Estratégico Cluster Habic 2020–2023. pp. 10–65. Available online: https://habic.eus/sobre-habic.aspx (accessed on 6 February 2021).
- Sellitto, M.A.; Camfield, C.G.; Buzuku, S. Green innovation and competitive advantages in a furniture industrial cluster: A survey and structural model. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2020, 23, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habic. Internal Survey on CSR Awareness and SDG Alignment. Available online: https://habic.eus/compromisoods.aspx (accessed on 10 February 2021).
- Habic. Objetivos para Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS). Available online: https://habic.eus/compromisoods.aspx (accessed on 5 February 2021).
- López-Pérez, M.E.; Melero, I.; Sese, F.J. Management for sustainable development and its impact on firm value in the SME context: Does size matter? Bus. Strategy Environ. 2017, 26, 985–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- KPMG. The Time Has Come. The KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting. 2020. Available online: www.home.kpmg/sustainabilityreporting (accessed on 13 February 2021).
- Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Making the Case for SME Sustainability Reporting. Available online: https://www.globalreporting.org/information/news-and-press-center/Pages/Small-Business,-Big-Impact-Making-the-case-for-SME-Sustainability-Reporting.aspx (accessed on 14 February 2021).
- Global Reporting Initiative—United Nations Global Compact. Business Reporting on SDGs Analysis of Goals and Targets; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 12–13. [Google Scholar]
- KPMG. The Road Ahead. The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting; KPMG: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; Available online: https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2017/10/executive-summary-the-kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2021).
- Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). 101 Foundation, 102 General Disclosures, and 103 Management Approach. 2016. Available online: https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1037/gri-102-general-disclosures-2016.pdf (accessed on 22 February 2021).
- Rabiee, F. Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2004, 63, 655–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zorpas, A. Environmental management systems as sustainable tools in the way of life for SMEs and VSMEs. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 1544–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maijala, A.; Pohjola, T. Web-based environmental management systems for SMEs: Enhancing the diffusion of environmental management in the transportation sector. In Sustainability Accounting and Reporting; Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R., Eds.; Springer Publishing: London, UK, 2006; Chapter 29; pp. 655–677. [Google Scholar]
- Seidel, M.; Seidel, R.; Tedford, D.; Cross, R.; Wait, L.; Hämmerle, E. Overcoming barriers to implementing environmentally benign manufacturing practices: Strategic tools for SMEs. Environ. Qual. Manag. 2008, 18, 37–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerr, I.R. Leadership strategies for sustainable SME operation. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2006, 15, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liedtke, C.; Kaiser, K. Nachhaltiges wirtschaften in der praxis: Projekte und erfahrungen des wuppertal institut für klima, umwelt und energie. In Berufliche Bildung für nachhaltiges Wirtschaften; Tiemeyer, E., Wilbers, K., Eds.; Bertelsmannverlag: Bielefeld, Germany, 2006; pp. 186–204. [Google Scholar]
- Hillary, R. Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise. J. Clean. Prod. 2004, 12, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collins, E.; Lawrence, S.; Pavlovich, K.; Ryan, C. Business networks and the uptake of sustainability practices: The case of New Zealand. J. Clean. Prod. 2007, 15, 729–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tencati, A.; Perrini, F.; Pogutz, S. New tools to foster corporate socially responsible behavior. J. Bus. Ethics 2004, 53, 173–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murillo, D.; Lozano, C. Pushing forward SME CSR through a network: An account from the Catalan model. Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 2009, 18, 7–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jiménez, E.; de la Cuesta-González, M.; Boronat-Navarro, M. How Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Can Uptake the Sustainable Development Goals through a Cluster Management Organization: A Case Study. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5939. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115939
Jiménez E, de la Cuesta-González M, Boronat-Navarro M. How Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Can Uptake the Sustainable Development Goals through a Cluster Management Organization: A Case Study. Sustainability. 2021; 13(11):5939. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115939
Chicago/Turabian StyleJiménez, Eduardo, Marta de la Cuesta-González, and Montserrat Boronat-Navarro. 2021. "How Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Can Uptake the Sustainable Development Goals through a Cluster Management Organization: A Case Study" Sustainability 13, no. 11: 5939. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115939
APA StyleJiménez, E., de la Cuesta-González, M., & Boronat-Navarro, M. (2021). How Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Can Uptake the Sustainable Development Goals through a Cluster Management Organization: A Case Study. Sustainability, 13(11), 5939. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115939