Sustainable Learning Environment by Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Methods on the Improvement of Productive and Receptive Foreign Language Skills: A Comparative Study for Asian Universities
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Purpose and Research Questions
- -
- What are the useful features of mobile-assisted language learning methods in foreign language learning for productive (speaking and writing) and receptive (listening and reading) skills?
- -
- Do technology acceptance models (TAM) play a vitally essential role for prospective language learning teachers to adopt their educational purposes?
- -
- Why do students choose each type of application in their future and current targets?
- -
- What are the differences between the university students’ preferences and perceptions on the selection of mobile-assisted language learning methods?
- -
- How can the students improve their communicational skills by using MALL?
3. Methodology
- The impact of mobiles on language learning on English Foreign Language (EFL) university students [46].
- Foreign language vocabulary learning with mobile technologies [23].
- Learning ESL vocabulary with smartphones [47].
- Effects of English spelling learning experience through a mobile LINE APP for college students [48].
- Prospective English teachers’ ownership and usage of mobile devices as M-learning tools [49].
- A study of EFL college students’ acceptance of mobile learning [50].
- Utilization of WhatsApp on mobile learning for YDS foreign language exam held in Turkey [51].
- Use learning resources as a self-directed technique by Chinese postgraduate EFL learners [52].
Description of the Selected Papers
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Language Skills Interpretation
4.2. Technology Concepts
5. Conclusions
- -
- LINE and WhatsApp would be two useful applications for receptive and productive language skills, respectively.
- -
- The technology acceptance model (TAM) would be a prominent option for teachers to adapt their current and future educational programs instead of only in-person teaching to improve students’ learning quality.
- -
- MALL methods would be of interest, especially for academic educational purposes, to improve vocabulary learning.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
MALL | Mobile-Assisted Language Learning |
TAM | Technology Acceptance Model |
FLE | Foreign Language Education |
IELTS | International English Language Testing System |
TOEFL | Test of English as a Foreign Language |
IGCSE | International General Certificate of Secondary Education |
ICT | Information and Communications Technology |
PDA | Personal Digital Assistant |
EFL | English as a Foreign Language |
YDS | Language Proficiency Test administered in Turkey |
2D | 2 Dimensional |
ELT | English Language Teaching |
References
- Byram, M.; Holmes, P.; Savvides, N. Intercultural communicative competence in foreign language education: Questions of theory, practice and research. Lang. Learn. J. 2013, 41, 251–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barnard, R.; Richards, J.C.; Rodgers, T.S. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. TESOL Q. 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Granger, S. Learner Corpora in Foreign Language Education. Lang. Technol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liaw, M.L.; Johnson, R.J. E-mail writing as a cross-cultural learning experience. System 2001, 29, 235–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Hir, M.-P. Remapping the Foreign Language Curriculum: An Approach through Multiple Literacies (review). Composite 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davarpanah, A.; Shirmohammadi, R.; Mirshekari, B.; Aslani, A. Analysis of hydraulic fracturing techniques: Hybrid fuzzy approaches. Arab. J. Geosci. 2019, 12, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, M.N.A.; Ngadiran, N.M.; Samad, N.A.; Powzi, N.F.A. English language learning beyond the borders: Constructing e-collaborative learning between students of different regions. Univ. J. Educ. Res. 2020, 8, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaisuriya, A.; Shin, S.Y. Examining english test practicality among different stakeholders in Thailand. J. Asia TEFL 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeong, K.O. Developing efl learners’ communicative competence through multimedia-assisted language learning. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 2018, 96, 1367–1376. [Google Scholar]
- Valeeva, R.A.; Baykova, O.V.; Kusainov, A.K. Foreign language professional communicative competence as a component of the academic science teacher’s professional competence. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ. 2016, 11, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peets, K.F.; Yim, O.; Bialystok, E. Language proficiency, reading comprehension and home literacy in bilingual children: The impact of context. Int. J. Biling. Educ. Biling. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Presbitero, A. Foreign language skill, anxiety, cultural intelligence and individual task performance in global virtual teams: A cognitive perspective. J. Int. Manag. 2020, 26, 100729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loh, J.M.I.; Thorsteinsson, E.B.; Loi, N.M. Workplace incivility and work outcomes: Cross-cultural comparison between Australian and Singaporean employees. Asia Pac. J. Hum. Resour. 2019, 59, 305–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mogias, A.; Boubonari, T.; Realdon, G.; Previati, M.; Mokos, M.; Koulouri, P.; Cheimonopoulou, M.T. Evaluating ocean literacy of elementary school students: Preliminary results of a cross-cultural study in the Mediterranean Region. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brownell, C.J. Inventing expert in English language arts: A case study of critical literacies in a third grade classroom. J. Early Child. Lit. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Heydon, R.; Li, W.; Malins, P. Literacies and identities in transnational education: A case study of literacy curricula in a Canadian transnational education programme in China. Curric. J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Macías, D.F. Classroom management in Foreign Language education: An exploratory review. Profile Issues Teach. Prof. Dev. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mortazavi, M.; Hocanın, F.T.; Davarpanah, A. Application of quantitative computer-based analysis for student’s learning tendency on the efficient utilization of mobile phones during lecture hours. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Üstün Aksoy, Y.; Dimililer, Ç. Teacher opinions on usage of mobile learning in pre-school foreign language learning. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2017, 13, 5405–5412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dashtestani, R. Moving bravely towards mobile learning: Iranian students’ use of mobile devices for learning English as a foreign language. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavus, N.; Ibrahim, D. Learning English using children’s stories in mobile devices. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2017, 48, 625–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Silva, A.C.; Freire, F.M.P.; Mourão, V.H.M.; De Oliveira Da Cruz, M.D.; Da Rocha, H.V. Portability and usability of open educational resources on mobile devices: A study in the context of Brazilian educational portals and android-based devices. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Learning, Madrid, Spain, 28 February–2 March 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Agca, R.K.; Özdemir, S. Foreign Language Vocabulary Learning with Mobile Technologies. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 83, 781–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Prinsloo, D.J. Electronic Dictionaries viewed from South Africa. HERMES J. Lang. Commun. Bus. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huang, R.T.; Hsiao, C.H.; Tang, T.W.; Lien, T.C. Exploring the moderating role of perceived flexibility advantages in mobile learning continuance intention (MLCI). Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ally, M.; Prieto-Blázquez, J. What is the future of mobile learning in education? Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2014, 11, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barbour, M.K.; Grzebyk, T.Q.; Eye, J. Any time, any place, any pace-really? Examining mobile learning in a virtual school environment. Turk. Online J. Distance Educ. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Andujar, A.; Salaberri-Ramiro, M.S.; Martínez, M.S.C. Integrating Flipped Foreign Language Learning through Mobile Devices: Technology Acceptance and Flipped Learning Experience. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Abdullah Al-Garawi, A.Y. Investigating the Use of Instagram as a MALL Tool: The Case of Al-Imam University EFL Students. Arab World Engl. J. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gonulal, T. The use of instagram as a mobile-assisted language learning tool. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, S.M. A systematic review of context-aware technology use in foreign language learning. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarré, C.; Grosbois, M.; Brudermann, C. Fostering accuracy in L2 writing: Impact of different types of corrective feedback in an experimental blended learning EFL course. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kukulska-Hulme, A.; Shield, L. An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Al Azri, R.H.; Al-Rashdi, M.H. The Effect Of Using Authentic Materials In Teaching. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2014, 47, 2422–2843. [Google Scholar]
- Herrington, J.; Kervin, L. Authentic learning supported by technology: Ten suggestions and cases of integration in classrooms. EMI. Educ. Media Int. 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shadiev, R.; Hwang, W.Y.; Huang, Y.M.; Liu, T.Y. Cognitive Diffusion Model: Facilitating EFL Learning in an Authentic Environment. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 2017, 10, 168–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu-Al-Aish, A.; Love, S. Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning: An investigation in higher education. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kennedy, C.; Levy, M. L’italiano al telefonino: Using SMS to support beginners’ language learning. ReCALL 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, H.; Song, W.; Burston, J. Reexamining the effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phones. Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol. 2011, 10, 203–214. [Google Scholar]
- Seliaman, M.E.; Al-Turki, M. Mobile Learning Adoption in Saudi Arabia. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Başoǧlu, E.B.; Akdemir, Ö. A comparison of undergraduate students’ English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 2010, 9, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, C.K.; Hsu, C.K. A mobile-assisted synchronously collaborative translation-annotation system for english as a foreign language (EFL) reading comprehension. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sung, Y.T.; Chang, K.E.; Yang, J.M. How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis. Educ. Res. Rev. 2015, 16, 68–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Mouelhy, I.; Poon, I.H.C.; Hui, A.N.N.; Sue-Chan, C. Does a Creative Learning Medium Matter? Impact of Low Cost Android Tablets on Elementary Students’ English Comprehension, Perceived Performance and Memory Retention. Creat. Educ. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mills, M.; Van De Bunt, G.G.; De Bruijn, J. Comparative research: Persistent problems and promising solutions. Int. Sociol. 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Muhammed, A.A. The Impact of Mobiles on Language Learning on the Part of English Foreign Language (EFL) University Students. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 136, 104–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wu, Q. Learning ESL Vocabulary with Smartphones. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 143, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shih, R.-C.; Lee, C.; Cheng, T.-F. Effects of English Spelling Learning Experience through a Mobile LINE APP for College Students. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 174, 2634–2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oz, H. Prospective English Teachers’ Ownership and Usage of Mobile Devices as M-learning Tools. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chung, H.-H.; Chen, S.-C.; Kuo, M.-H. A Study of EFL College Students’ Acceptance of Mobile Learning. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saritepeci, M.; Duran, A.; Ermiş, U.F. A new trend in preparing for foreign language exam (YDS) in Turkey: Case of WhatsApp in mobile learning. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Pérez-Paredes, P. Chinese postgraduate EFL learners’ self-directed use of mobile English learning resources. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mishra, V.M. Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed.; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Steel, C. Fitting learning into life: Language students’ perspectives on benefits of using mobile apps. In Proceedings of the ASCILITE 2012—Annual conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Tertiary Education, Wellington, New Zealand, 23 February 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Kuo, Y.C.; Chu, H.C.; Huang, C.H. A learning style-based grouping collaborative learning approach to improve EFL students’ performance in english courses. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2015, 18, 284–298. [Google Scholar]
- Belenkova, N.; Kruse, I. Determining Descriptors of Professional Foreign Language Competence for Law-setting Specialists. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2017, 237, 1398–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, H. Linguistics in language teaching. In The Linguistic Structure of Modern English; John Benjamins Publishing: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; ISBN 978-9-02728-824-0. [Google Scholar]
Paper | Context | Participants | Article Scope | Purpose Tools | Research Type | Result (Keypoints) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Iraq | University EFL students (N = 20) | The influence of mobile technology on learning a foreign language | Smartphone applications | Qualitative (Focus group) |
|
2 | Turkey | Fresh and junior university students (N = 40) | The effect of the multimedia content integrated into language learning materials to improve vocabulary learning and students’ perception | 2D barcode technology | Mixed method |
|
3 | China | ESL sophomore college students (N = 50) | The effect of smartphones on learning English vocabulary | Smartphones and Microsoft Tag | Pre-test and post-test |
|
4 | Taiwan | college students (N = 29) | The influence of mobile learning using LINE APP on college students’ spelling | Smartphone APPs (LINE APP) | Pre-assessment, a Post-assessment, and a survey questionnaire |
|
5 | Turkey | University students and teachers (N = 144) | English language-teaching teachers and their enthusiasm and insights to administer smartphones in their teaching environment are an M-learning method. | M-learning | Quantitative (Questionnaire) |
|
6 | Taiwan | Junior university students (N = 84) | Behavioral intentions of students to accept technology devices as a convenient tool for educational purposes. | Mobile APPs | Quantitative (Questionnaire) |
|
7 | Turkey | University Student (N = 29) | Application of WhatsApp in educational contexts for foreign language exam (YDS) | Mobile Apps (WhatsApp) | Qualitative (Semi-structured interview) |
|
8 | China | Postgraduate EFL university students (N = 95) | Mobile English learning resources impact the self-efficacy of language learning | Mobile-Assisted Language learning | Mixed-Method (semi-structured interview and questionnaire) |
|
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mortazavi, M.; Nasution, M.K.M.; Abdolahzadeh, F.; Behroozi, M.; Davarpanah, A. Sustainable Learning Environment by Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Methods on the Improvement of Productive and Receptive Foreign Language Skills: A Comparative Study for Asian Universities. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6328. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116328
Mortazavi M, Nasution MKM, Abdolahzadeh F, Behroozi M, Davarpanah A. Sustainable Learning Environment by Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Methods on the Improvement of Productive and Receptive Foreign Language Skills: A Comparative Study for Asian Universities. Sustainability. 2021; 13(11):6328. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116328
Chicago/Turabian StyleMortazavi, Mohsen, Mahyuddin K. M. Nasution, Foad Abdolahzadeh, Mojtaba Behroozi, and Afshin Davarpanah. 2021. "Sustainable Learning Environment by Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Methods on the Improvement of Productive and Receptive Foreign Language Skills: A Comparative Study for Asian Universities" Sustainability 13, no. 11: 6328. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116328
APA StyleMortazavi, M., Nasution, M. K. M., Abdolahzadeh, F., Behroozi, M., & Davarpanah, A. (2021). Sustainable Learning Environment by Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Methods on the Improvement of Productive and Receptive Foreign Language Skills: A Comparative Study for Asian Universities. Sustainability, 13(11), 6328. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116328