Next Article in Journal
Italy Is Fragile: Soil Consumption and Climate Change Combined Effects on Territorial Heritage Maintenance
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessment of the Heavy Metals Pollution and Ecological Risk in Sediments of Mediterranean Sea Drain Estuaries in Egypt and Phytoremediation Potential of Two Emergent Plants
Previous Article in Journal
A COVID-19 Pandemic Sustainable Educational Innovation Management Proposal Framework
Previous Article in Special Issue
Environmental and Stress Analysis of Wild Plant Habitat in River Nile Region of Dakahlia Governorate on Basis of Geospatial Techniques
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimizing the Biosorption Behavior of Ludwigia stolonifera in the Removal of Lead and Chromium Metal Ions from Synthetic Wastewater

1
Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
2
Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
3
Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Biotechnology, College of Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
5
City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications (SRTA-City), New Borg El-Arab City P.O. Box 21934, Egypt
6
National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF), Baltium 33735, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(11), 6390; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116390
Submission received: 14 April 2021 / Revised: 2 May 2021 / Accepted: 21 May 2021 / Published: 4 June 2021

Abstract

:
In this study, a natural low-coast, efficient, and eco- bio-sorbent plant material (Ludwigia stolonifera), with both parts of the root and shoot, were studied for the removal of the cationic metal ions, lead Pb2+ and chromium Cr6+, via batch mode experiments to evaluate their maximum adsorption capacity, and held a comparison between the used bio-sorbent roots and shoots, based on the highest bio-sorption potential. Optimization of the bio-sorption parameters, such as contact time, pH, bio-sorbent (root and shoot) dosage, and initial ion concentration was conducted. The results indicated that 1.6 g of the used bio-sorbent shoot material removed 81.4% of Pb2+, and 77% of Cr6+ metal ions from liquid media under the conditions of 100 ppm of initial metal ions concentration at room temperature for 60 min of contact time with the static condition. Different isotherms and kinetic models were fit to the experimental data to understand the nature of the bio-sorption process. The experimental data were best fit by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model with a high correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.999), which reveals the chemisorption nature of the bio-sorption process. The chemical and structural analysis of the used bio-sorbent, before and after Cr6+ and Pb2+ bio-sorption, were performed using different techniques of characterization, such as Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The used bio-sorbent proved to be a low-cost, efficient, and eco-friendly material to remove heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions.

1. Introduction

Freshwater is essential to all living organisms’ survival as it is the main source of health, food, and energy. The whole world is facing a water crisis nowadays, due to the rapid growth of population and the consumption of large quantities of water by many industries, household, and agriculture activities. The effluent wastewater from some industries such as paper and pulp production, ceramics, smelting, and battery production is considered to be the main source of toxic heavy metals to the environment [1,2] This issue is of increasing concern, due to the adverse health effects of these effluents contaminated with various types of heavy metals types, such as; Cr6+, Pb2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, Ni2+, As3+ and Hg2+ which are not biodegradable and cause severe health risks such as skin damage, liver, and lung cancer [3,4].
Of these heavy metals Chromium is of significant interest, due to it being considered the 16th most toxic element causing severe adverse health effects, according to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). It has two oxidation states in nature: trivalent Cr3+ and hexavalent Cr6+. Cr6+ is 500 times more toxic than Cr3+, Cr6+ moves faster in ground and surface waters in a wide range of pH and causes adverse health effects such as asthma, eye irritation, and liver damage. It is involved in various industries such as mining, textile, and anti-corrosion materials [5,6].
Besides Cr6+, one of the most toxic heavy metal ions is lead (Pb2+, The reported levels of lead in waterways across Egypt are between 20–30 µg/L [7,8], which is up to double or triple the amount considered safe to drink, set by US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 15 µg/L. These high levels of Pb2+ lead to retardation in children and reduced breast milk in young mothers in addition to anemia, kidney damage, and mental retardation [9,10,11]. Any exposure to Pb causes a wide range of physiological, biochemical, and behavioral effects. Most serious effects occur in the central and peripheral nervous systems, the cardiovascular system, the hematopoietic system, and in some organs such as the liver and kidneys [12].
This makes us choose the removal of Cr6+ and Pb2+ metal ions from aqueous solutions to protect human beings and the environment [13]. Different chemical and physical methods are used to remove heavy metals, including advanced oxidation, membrane separation, and solvent extraction, but these techniques are expensive and produce unwanted by-products. Therefore, we must search for alternative methods, especially bio-based technologies such as bioremediation and phytoremediation, as they are safer, cheaper, environmentally friendly, and without adverse effects.
Bio-sorption has been shown to be an effective method for the removal of various toxic metal ions, due to the bio-sorption systems ease of use and simple, inexpensive design [14,15,16]. The bio-sorption process includes a reversible adsorption reaction between adsorbent and adsorbate, which allows for the constant reuse of the bio-sorption material in a sustainable fashion. The bio-material also boasts efficient removal of Cr6+ and Pb2+ metal ions due to many bio-sorption sites that contain functional groups such as OH and C=O which have a high binding affinity to the metal ions [16,17,18,19]. In Egypt, Ludwigia stolonifera (family Onagraceae) is one of the most common invasive macrophyte plant of high growth and spread rates in waterways [20], causing the blocking of waterways.
However, these perennial weeds have white spongy floats, and can float on water, or crawl on the surface of wetlands, and have an incredible ability to collect and adsorb metal ions in waterways [21]. The used bio-sorbent (L. stolonifera) possess many functional groups as carbonyl, amino, hydroxyl, and phenolic groups, which are very important to the bio-sorption process of Cr6+ and Pb2+ metal ions, as they can form chelates and complexes with them [4,22].
In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of L. stolonifera with both parts of the root and shoot as an eco-bio-sorbent material for the removal of Cr6+ and Pb2+ metal ions from aqueous solutions. The powdery mass of roots and shoots of the used bio-sorbent were characterized before and after the bio-sorption process using SEM and FTIR techniques. Different bio-sorption parameters were optimized for the maximum bio-sorption capacity of Cr6+ and Pb2+ metal ions onto the used bio-sorbent material. The bio-sorption equilibrium and kinetics were also employed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Preparation of the Used Bio-Sorbent (L. stolonifera)

During the spring of 2020, composite samples of a common perennial floating macrophyte plant (Ludwigia stolonifera) were prepared. This plant was selected according to the field observations, where they are naturally growing in all sampled sites. The plant was collected from River Nile Damietta branch, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt (31°90′53.46″ N 31°29′50.97″ E) in plastic bags. The plant samples were washed by tap water and distilled water to remove dust and then separated into shoots and roots. The samples were dried completely at 65 °C in an oven and ground into a powder with an electric grinder. Nomenclature and identification of the plant species were carried out according to Tackholm [23] and Boulos [24].

2.2. Preparation of Pb (II) and Cr (VI) Metal Ions Standard Solutions

Stock solutions of Pb2+ and Cr6+ metal ions were prepared by dissolving a known weight of K2Cr2O7, and Pb (C2H3O2). 3H2O in Double-Distilled Water (DDW), standards of 1000 mg/L. A series of working solutions were prepared with different concentrations varying between 100 and 1000 ppm. Solution pH 2–10 was adjusted by using diluted solutions of 0.1 N HCl and 0.1 N NaOH. All chemicals are pure and analytical reagent grade acquired from Sigma Aldrich, Cairo, Egypt.

2.3. The Used Bio-Sorbent (L. stolonifera) Characterization

The surface morphology and topography of the used bio-sorbent (L. stolonifera) root and shoot before and after their bio-sorption of Pb 2+ and Cr 6+ metal ions were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JSM-6510, JEOL/EO, Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerated voltage of 30 kV. Additionally, their chemical structure and functional group were analyzed using Fourier transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic analysis. Pellets were formed through mixing samples with KBr, and then they were compressed into disks to be able to enter the FTIR instrument. The spectra were recorded in the wavenumber range from 400–4000 cm−1 and 32 scans per sample with a resolution of 8.000 from 400.1737 to 3999.8091. FTIR spectra were estimated with an FTIR spectrometer (FTIR-8400 S, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

2.4. Batch Bio-Sorption Studies

Bio-sorption of Pb2+ and Cr6+ metal ions onto the used bio-sorbents were performed through batch-mode experiments at room temperature. 50 mL of the prepared working metal solutions (100 ppm) was added to a defined weight of roots and shoots of the used bio-sorbent (L. stolonifera) in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, then they were shaken on a mechanical shaker at 200 rpm for a specified bio-sorption contact time of 60–180 min, then, the adsorbate- adsorbent solutions were centrifuged (at 15.000 rpm for 15 min followed by filtration. The filtrates were collected, and their Pb2+ and Cr6+ metal ion concentration differences were measured using atomic absorption spectroscopy (Buck Scientific Accusys 211 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer, East Norwalk, CT, USA) with air-acetylene flame at the wavelength of 357.87 and 283.31. The conducted batch experiments include: contact time (10–300 min), pH (2–10), bio sorbent (root and shoot) dosage (0.2–1.6 g), and initial metal ion concentration (50–700 ppm) were studied and optimized to find out the maximum bio sorption capacity of the selected metal ions onto the used bio-sorbent (L. stolonifera) root and shoot. The heavy metal removal percentage and bio-sorption capacity (represent the amount of metal ion uptake) were calculated using Equations (1) and (2).
R e m o v a l   e f f i c i e n c y   ( % ) = ( C i   C e ) C i   × 100
q e =   ( C i C e ) m   × V
where Ci and Ce are the initial and final (equilibrium) metal ions concentration (ppm); m is the mass of the used bio-sorbent (L. stolonifera) (g), and V is the volume of used metal ion solution. All tests were performed in triplicate. The equilibrium studies of Pb2+ and Cr6+ metal ions bio-sorption onto the used bio-sorbent (L. stolonifera) root and shoot were conducted, and the obtained data were fit to three isotherms models. However, the kinetic studies were carried as a function of contact time.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Bio-Sorbent Characterization

3.1.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

We observed the surface morphology, topography, and dimensions of the used bio-sorbent (root and shoot), before and after their bio-sorption of Cr6+ and Pb2+ metal ions, using SEM instrument. As can be seen in Figure 1, the used bio-sorbent root (A) and shoot (D) cells, before the bio-sorption process, almost have the same outfit and morphological structure, as the cellular structure of both cells might be the same or relatively similar from the morphological point of view. The root and shoot of the used bio-sorbent have smooth surfaces with a lack of pores. Moreover, from the figure (B,C) which represent the bio-sorption process of Cr6+ and Pb2+, respectively, onto the used bio-sorbent root and (E,F), which point out the used bio-sorbent shoot after the bio-sorption process of Cr6+ and Pb 2+, respectively, that the surface topography of the used bio-sorbent (L. stolonifera) was different from the native cells through increasing the surface roughness. The bio-sorbed Cr6+ and Pb2+ ions were clearly aggregated on the used bio-sorbent surface, which approve the bio-sorption process.

3.1.2. FTIR Analysis

The used bio-sorbent, L. stolonifera (root and shoot), adsorption capacity relay on porosity and chemical reactivity of their surface functional groups [25]. The chemical structure of the used bio-sorbent material (root and shoot), before and after the bio-sorption of Pb2+ and Cr6+ metal ions, were analyzed using the FTIR technique to figure out the difference in the spectra due to the reaction of the used bio-sorbent functional groups with the chosen metal ions and to understand their possible bio-sorptive interactions.
The spectra of root and shoot of the used bio-sorbent in this study are quite similar which shows that they have similar functional groups on their surfaces. It was pretty clear from Figure 2 that there were clear shifts in the wavenumber, between the used bio-sorbent (root and shoot) sample, before and after the bio-sorption of Cr6+ and Pb2+ metal ions, which approved the binding process of the metals onto the used bio-sorbent surfaces [25]. As in the Figure, there was a clear shift from wavenumber at 1043 cm−1 in the root sample to 1057 cm−1 in Cr bio-sorbed root, which attributed to lignin’s -OCH3 group stretching vibration appearing in cellulose [26].
From 1368 cm−1 in the root sample, to 1376 cm−1 in Cr the bio-sorbed root, and 1442 cm−1 in (root sample) to 1403 in Cr bio-sorbed root, shifting in the wavenumber might be due to the adsorption of Cr ions onto C-O and C-O-H respectively.
There were some peaks in the root sample that disappeared after the binding mechanism with Cr metal ions such as at 3805 and 3906 cm−1 due to the adsorption of Cr onto the (N-H) group of the used bio-sorbent. While, for root samples bio-sorbed with Pb2+ metal ions, there was also shifting from wavenumber of 1056 cm−1 in the root sample to 1043 cm−1 in Pb bio-sorbed root, 1654 cm−1 in root sample to 1634 cm−1 in (Pb bio-sorbed root), and 3425 cm−1 to 3448 cm−1, this might be because of Pb binding with C-O, C=O, and O-H groups of the root adsorbent material. Moreover, some peaks were absent from the root sample, including 1232, 1325, and 1722 cm−1 due to the adsorption mechanism of Pb onto C-C, C-N, and C=O groups of the adsorbent. The presence of peak at 1378 cm−1 attributed to C-H vibrations in cellulose and at 2925 cm−1 attributed to C-H bond of CH3 and CH2 in hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin [27]. Additionally, the presence of (-COOH), and (-OH) functional groups, at the used bio-sorbents surfaces, can provide metal ions complexation sites. Moreover, the functional groups of nitrogen and oxygen atoms form a coordinate bond with metal cations, and that’s the reason behind the high affinity to bio-sorb Pb2+ metal ions more than Cr6+ [28].
As for the shoot IR spectra, there was shifting from wavenumber 1440, in the shoot sample, to 1423 cm−1 in the Cr bio-sorbed shoot, due to the adsorption of Cr on C-O-H of the shoot surface. As for the adsorption of Pb ions on the shoot surface, there was a clear shift from 1379 cm−1 to 1440 cm−1, and from 3426 cm−1 to 3448 cm−1 because of the binding of Pb metal ions with C-O-H and O-H groups of the adsorbent surface. In all samples, there is a broad absorption peak at 3448 cm−1, which indicates the presence of intermolecular, free O-H groups and bands of carboxylic acids [19].
There is no remarkable shifting of this peak because we didn’t make any chemical treatment to the used bio-sorbent. The presence of an intensive peak at 1645 cm−1 might be attributed to the absorption of water molecules linked with cellulose fibers [29]. The peak at 1524 cm−1 in root and shoot samples is due to stretching vibrations of C=C in the aromatic ring of lignin.

3.2. Batch-mode Experiments

3.2.1. Effect of Bio-Sorption Contact Time

The contact time between the bio-sorbent and bio-sorbate is a critical parameter affecting the bio-sorption process kinetics [30]. The equilibrium time for the bio-sorption of Pb2+, and Cr6+ metal ions onto the used bio-sorbent root and shoot was obtained through studying their time-dependent behavior in a time range of 10–300 min with keeping other parameters constant as in Figure 3a, which prevail that the bio-sorption rate was fast in the first period of contacting between the bio-sorbent and bio-sorbate, then it slowed down till near stability. Equilibria of Pb2+ metal ions onto the used bio-sorbent root and shoot were 120, and 60 min, respectively, while they were 120 and 180 for Cr6+ ions bio-sorbed onto root and shoot.

3.2.2. Effect of Solution pH

Solution pH plays a vital role in changing the availability of metal ions in this solution besides, the functional groups and chemical status of the bio-sorbent, which are responsible for the bio-sorption process [31]. Variation of solution pH was studied in the range of 2.0 up to 10.0 for Pb2+ and Cr6+ metal ions bio-sorption onto the used bio-sorbent. The removal efficiencies and bio-sorption capacity increase with increasing the pH in the acidic medium until it reached neutral and without a significant increase in the bio-sorption capacity, in the case of Pb2+ ions, while they both decreased in neutral and basic solutions in case of Cr6+ metal ions, as in Figure 3b, which illustrates that the percentage of removal increased from 21.4 up to 38.19%, from 18.93 to 28.71% for the bio-sorption of Cr6+ onto the used bio-sorbent shoot and root, respectively, when the solution pH increased from 2 up to 7, and from 20.5 up to 35.35%, 30.98 to 41.77% for the bio-sorption of Pb2+ ions onto the used bio-sorbent shoot and root, respectively when the solution pH increase from 2 up to 7, while they decreased with the increase in pH in case of Cr6+.
The bio-sorption capacity increase with increasing solution pH, as the increase in pH value, increases the negative charge on the used bio-sorbent surface which leads to a decrease in the competition between protons and metal ions. Moreover, at higher pH values (4–7), the used bio-sorbent surface possesses a negative charge which attracts the positively charged Pb2+ ions by electrostatic attraction. Furthermore, the maximum bio-sorption capacity of Cr6+ was in acidic medium and decreased in the neutral and basic medium due to the presence of excessive -OH groups in the alkaline medium hindered Cr6+ bio-sorption [15,32].
According to the figure, the % of removal of Pb2+ and Cr6+ metal ions, by using the bio-sorbent material shoot, was higher than roots due to the affinity of the shoot cells to certain heavy metal ions.

3.2.3. Effect of Initial Metal Ion Concentration

Figure 3c,d illustrates the effect of metal ions concentration variation on the bio-sorption process. The increase in Pb2+ and Cr6+ metal ions concentrations lead to a decrease in their removal efficiencies and increment in the bio-sorption capacities. As the percent of removal of Pb2+ decreased from 89.32 to 41.84%, and from 81.840 to 34.46% when the initial concentration of Pb2+ increased from 50 up to 700 ppm, while, the bio-sorption capacities increased from 3.722 to 24.407 mg/g, and from 3.410 to 20.103 mg/g when the Pb2+ concentrations raised from 50 to 700 ppm.
The same trend was also observed with the removal percentage efficiencies and bio-sorption capacities of Cr6+ metal ions, onto the used bio-sorbent root and shoot, as the removal percentage decreased from 82.70 to 24.16% and from 91.820 to 13.069% and from 91.820 to 13.069% and from 91.820 to 13.069% (for root and shoot respectively) with the increment of Cr6+ initial concentration from 50 up to 700 ppm, while the bio-sorption capacities were increased from 10.338 to 70 and from 11.478 up to 45 mg/g. This behavior might be attributed to that, above a certain metal ion concentration, all available active sites became saturated, which leads to a decrease in the removal efficiency, and the number of Pb2+, and Cr6+ metal ions in the liquid phase is larger than the active bio-sorption sites numbers located on the used bio-sorbents surfaces, moreover, the higher absorption rate causes increment in the bio-sorption capacities of the both used metal ions [33,34]. Samra [35], reported similar results, as the bio-sorption capacities of the used bio-sorbent increased with increasing metal ions concentrations because of the increasing metals diffusions rate in the boundary layer.

3.2.4. Effect of Bio-Sorbent Dosage

The effect of biomass amount on the bio-sorption of Cr6+ and Pb2+ metal ions was studied by varying the dosage of the used bio-sorbent root and shoot, from 0.2 up to 1.6 g, as illustrated in Figure 3e,f. The removal efficiencies of the selected metal ions increase with the increase in the used bio-sorbent material dosage, while their bio-sorption capacities decrease with the increment doses, as percent of removal increased from 29.062 up to 67.644%, and from 38.622 to 77.645% for the bio-sorption of Cr6+ onto the used bio-sorbent root and shoot, respectively.
The biomass dosage increased from 0.2 to 1.6 g, from 32.767 to 71.342%, from 42.32 up to 81.343% for the bio-sorption of Pb2+ ions onto the used bio-sorbent root and shoot respectively with the same dosage used with Cr6+ ions. This is can be due to the availability of more active sites on the used bio-sorbent surface, which are responsible for the bio-sorption process, which increases the adhesion forces between metal ions and the bio-sorbent material. However, the bio-sorption capacity decreases with the increase in the used bio-sorbent dose [36].

3.2.5. Equilibrium Modeling

Models of bio-sorption isotherms give up information about bio-sorbates distributions between the solid and liquid phases at the equilibrium state. We fit the obtained experimental equilibrium data of Pb2+, and Cr6+ metal ions onto the used bio-sorbent root and shoot to Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherm models [37] to find out the best-fit model, which described the bio-sorption process well. The used bio-sorption isotherms model linear forms are showed in Table 1, their bio-sorption parameters, and their constants, are illustrated in Table 2 and Figure 4.
The Langmuir model assumes monolayer coverage with a homogeneous surface bio-sorption without transmigration of the bio-sorbate molecules to the inner layers of the used bio-sorbent, and subsequently uniform, energies of bio-sorption on its surfaces. The Freundlich model means a heterogeneous and multi-layer of the bio-sorption process [38].
High R2 (0.975 and 0.944 for the bio-sorption of Cr6+ onto the used bio-sorbent root and shoot, respectively, and it was equal to 0.988 and 0.992 for the bio-sorption of Pb2+ onto the used material root and shoot, respectively) values illustrate a good curve fitting to the Langmuir model. Almost in all the fit bio-sorption isotherms models, the bio-sorption capacities of Cr6+ were lower than Pb2+, which might be because of the heavy metals’ complexation abilities, related to their functional groups, and solution pH. Nickel and copper can form such complexes, meanwhile, cadmium and lead possess higher bio-sorption capacities via ion exchange [39]. The obtained qm (mg g−1), which represent the maximum monolayer coverage capacities and calculated from the slope of (Figure 4a), were 43.478 and 25.641 mg/g for the bio-sorption of Cr6+ onto the used bio-sorbent root and shoot, respectively, while they were 80.796 and 65.519 for Pb2+ bio-sorption onto the used root and shoot bio-sorbent material. Furthermore, Kl represent the bio-sorption energy (L/mg), and their values were obtained from the intercept of (Figure 4a), as they were (0.056 and 0.045 for bio-sorption of Cr6+ and 0.018, and 0.017 (L/mg) for Pb2+ bio-sorption onto the used bio-sorbent root and shoot, respectively, which means that the used bio-sorbent material possesses high bio-sorption ability with low bio-sorption energy.
The Temkin isotherm deals with the indirect effects between bio-sorbent and bio-sorbate interactions on the bio-sorption process. The bio-sorption heat of all layer molecules decreases linearly with coverage due to bio-sorbent, and bio-sorbate reactions [40].
Finally, higher R2 values for Langmuir than Freundlich for the bio-sorption of Cr6+ onto the used bio-sorbent material root and shoot, suggesting a monolayer coverage of the bio-sorption process. While, their values were smaller for Langmuir than Freundlich, for the bio-sorption of Pb2+ onto the used bio-sorbent material root and shoot, suggesting that the chemisorption is not the only the bio-sorption mechanism in this process, both chemisorption and physisorption must be taken into consideration under studied conditions [41]. A comparison of the calculated maximum monolayer adsorption capacity for different adsorbent materials and the used material illustrated in Table 3.

3.2.6. Bio-Sorption Kinetic Models

It very important for the bio-sorption process to study the kinetic models, as it points out the uptake rate of the used bio-sorbent material. The bio-sorption kinetics of Pb2+ and Cr6+ metal ions onto the used bio-sorbent root and shoot were evaluated using four kinetic models (pseudo-first-order [42], pseudo-second-order, Elovich, and intra-particle Diffusion). The non-linearized equations of these models are tabulated in Table 4, and their bio-sorption Parameters were illustrated in Figure 5 and Table 5.
Table 3. Comparison of calculated maximum monolayer adsorption capacity for different adsorbent materials.
Table 3. Comparison of calculated maximum monolayer adsorption capacity for different adsorbent materials.
Metal IonAdsorbent MaterialAdsorption Capacity (mg/g)Reference
Pb2+Current study80.796
bael tree (BT) leaf powder4.065[43]
Polyethyleneimine and carbon disulfide co-modified alkaline lignin79.9 [44]
Moringa Oleifera15.38[45]
Cr6+Current study43.478
Soy Sauce Residue Biochar cr25.80[46]
Low-Cost Adsorbent Prepared from Neem Leaves10[47]
Durian Peel10.67[48]
For the first-kinetic model, the qe calculated values differed from their experimental ones, which means that this model was not good enough to describe this bio-sorption process. The pseudo-second order kinetic model R2 values obtained from the linear relationship between t/qt versus t were 0.999, 0.991, and 0.998 for the bio-sorption of Pb2+ and Cr6+ metal ions onto the used bio-sorbent material root and shoot, respectively, meaning that this model describes the bio-sorption process well and, subsequently, the chemisorption rate-limiting step is dominant in this process with sharing electrons between bio-sorbent and bio-sorbate [40,49].
The calculated qe (16.944 and 16.313 mg/g for the bio-sorption of Cr6+ onto the used bio-sorbent root and shoot, while they were 16.807 and 15.625 mg/g for Pb2+ bio-sorption onto the used material) values were compared with their experimental values (14.784 and 14.523 for Cr6+ sorption onto bio-sorbent root and shoot and 15.838 and 16.625 mg/g for Pb2+ sorption onto bio-sorbent root and shoot) and we found that they were so close, which shows that the gained data fit the second-order rate model.
K represents the reaction rate equilibrium constant (g/mg min) of the second-order and it can be calculated from (Figure 5b) intercept. The obtained K values were 0.038 and 0.044 for the bio-sorption of Cr6+ root and shoot, while they were 0.081 and 0.247 for Pb2+ bio-sorption onto the used bio-material root and shoot.
The obtained K values of the second-order kinetic model indicate a fast bio-sorption rate of Cr6+, and Pb2+ metal ions onto the used bio-sorbent (L. stolonifera) root and shoot.
Moreover, according to the above-mentioned results, which cleared the chemisorption attitude of the bio-sorption process, the simple Elovich model is used, which describes the chemisorption kinetics [50]. According to Table 4, it was pretty clear that the experimental data fit well with the Elovich equation with high R2 values, which confirms the above-mentioned conclusion about the chemisorption nature of the bio-sorption process utilizing the used bio-sorbent material.
Finally, we fit the obtained data with the intra-particle diffusion model. There is a multi-stage process that controls the bio-sorption of metal ions from liquid to solid phase: in the first step, metal ions transport from the liquid to the solid phase surface (bulk diffusion), followed by diffusion of the metal ions through the boundary layer of the used bio-sorbate surface (film diffusion), and finally, their transmigration from the solid bio-sorbate surface to its inner layers (intra-particle diffusion). From the intra-particle diffusion equation, the intercept represents the boundary layer thickness, so, the increment of the intercept value leads to increasing the boundary layer effect. If the linear relationship between qt against t 1/2, results in a line that passes through the origin, in this case, the intra-particle diffusion is the controlling step [51]. In this study, no line passed through the origin for both metal ions’ bio-sorption, so this shifting of lines might be due to the mass transfer rates in the first and last diffusion stages not being stable [52].

4. Conclusions

Phytoremediation technologies are considered an effective, eco-friendly, and cheap way to clean up water contaminated with hazardous pollutants, such as the heavy metals (Cr6+, and Pb2+). Many factors affect the bio-sorption of metal ions onto the bio-sorbent L. stolonifera, such as metal ion content, medium pH-value, biomass dosage, and contact time between the bio-sorbent and bio-sorbate and were evaluated through a series of bench-scale experiments which revealed that the maximum removal uptake percentage of Pb2+ (81.34%) was achieved with the used bio-sorbent shoot, while it was 77.64% for Cr6+ onto the used bio-sorbent shoot, with a maximum bio-sorption capacity of 80.79 mg/g at room temperature, according to the Langmuir isotherm. The Langmuir isotherm model was the best fit model among the three tested models, which suggested monolayer coverage of the bio-sorption of Cr6+ and Pb2+ metal ions onto the used bio-sorbent with a maximum bio-sorption capacity of 43.5 and 80.79 mg/g, respectively, at room temperature. The kinetics of the Cr6+ and P2+ bio-sorption rate were best explained by the pseudo-second-order kinetic equation and the simple Elovich and intraparticle diffusion models as the bio-sorption kinetics can be explained by many independent processes. According to the gained data, the % of removal of Pb2+ and Cr6+ metal ions by using the bio-sorbent material shoot was higher than roots, due to the affinity of the shoot cells to certain heavy metal ions, moreover, its affinity to adsorb Pb2+ is higher than Cr6+ due to the same reason.

Author Contributions

Y.A.E.-A., H.F. and A.E. suggested the work protocol, performed the laboratory experiments, interpreted the results and prepared the manuscript; M.A.E.-E., A.N. and H.D. revised the manuscript and helped in funding acquisition, resources and data analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The current work was funded by Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP—2020/141), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Taif University for funding this work through Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/141), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Logam, P.; Kumbahan, A. Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewater Using Date Palm as a Biosorbent. Comp. Rev. 2018, 47, 35–49. [Google Scholar]
  2. El Awady, F.R.; Abbas, M.A.; Abdelghany, A.M.; El-Amir, Y.A. Silver Modified Hydrophytes for Heavy Metal Removal from Different Water Resources. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2021, 11, 14555–14563. [Google Scholar]
  3. Elmorsi, R.R.; El-Wakeel, S.T.; El-Dein, W.A.S.; Lotfy, H.R.; Rashwan, W.E.; Nagah, M.; Shaaban, S.A.; Ahmed, S.A.S.; El-Sherif, I.Y.; Abou-El-Sherbini, K.S. Adsorption of Methylene Blue and Pb2+ by using acid-activated Posidonia oceanica waste. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Baby, R.; Saifullah, B.; Hussein, M.Z. Palm Kernel Shell as an effective adsorbent for the treatment of heavy metal contaminated water. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kulkarni, P.S.; Watwe, V.S.; Hipparge, A.J.; Sayyad, S.I.; Sonawane, R.A.; Kulkarni, S.D. Valorization of Uncharred Dry Leaves of Ficus benjamina towards Cr (VI) removal from Water: Efficacy Influencing Factors and mechanism. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Liu, H.; Zhang, F.; Peng, Z. Adsorption mechanism of Cr(VI) onto GO/PAMAMs composites. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Mohamed, M.; Osman, M.; Potter, T.; Levin, R. Lead and cadmium in Nile River water and finished drinking water in Greater Cairo, Egypt. Environ. Int. 1998, 24, 767–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mandour, R.A.; Ghanem, A.-A.; El-Azab, S.M. Correlation between lead levels in drinking water and mothers’ breast milk: Dakahlia, Egypt. Environ. Geochem. Heal. 2012, 35, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Banks, E.C.; Ferretti, L.E.; Shucard, D.W. Effects of low level lead exposure on cognitive function in children: A review of behavioral, neuropsychological and biological evidence. NeuroToxicology 1997, 18, 237–281. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Vaziri, N.D.; Gonick, H.C. Cardiovascular effects of lead exposure. Indian J. Med. Res. 2008, 128, 426–435. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Wan, I.A.; Ara, A.; Usman, J.A. Lead Toxicity: A Review. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2015, 8, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Charkiewicz, A.E.; Backstrand, J.R. Lead Toxicity and Pollution in Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Thamer, B.M.; Aldalbahi, A.; Moydeen, A.M.; Al-Enizi, A.M.; El-Hamshary, H.; El-Newehy, M.H. Fabrication of functionalized electrospun carbon nanofibers for enhancing lead-ion adsorption from aqueous solutions. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Burakov, A.E.; Galunin, E.V.; Burakova, I.V.; Kucherova, A.E.; Agarwal, S.; Tkachev, A.G.; Gupta, V.K. Adsorption of Heavy Metals on Conventional and Nanostructured Materials for Wastewater Treatment Purposes: A Review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 148, 702–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Usman, K.; Al-Ghouti, M.A.; Abu-Dieyeh, M.H. The assessment of cadmium, chromium, copper, and nickel tolerance and bioaccumulation by shrub plant Tetraena qataranse. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Santhosh, C.; Nivetha, R.; Kollu, P.; Srivastava, V.; Sillanpää, M.; Grace, A.N.; Bhatnagar, A. Removal of cationic and anionic heavy metals from water by 1D and 2D-carbon structures decorated with magnetic nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gholamreza, M.; Behnam, B. Biosorption of Chromium (VI) from Industrial Wastewater onto Pistachio Hull Waste Biomass. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 162, 893–900. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fiol, N.; Escudero, C.; Villaescusa, I. Chromium sorption and Cr(VI) reduction to Cr(III) by grape stalks and yohimbe bark. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 5030–5036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nnaji, C.C.; Ebeagwu, C.J.; Ugwu, E.I. Physicochemical Conditions for Adsorption of Lead from Water by Rice Husk Ash. BioResources 2016, 12, 799–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zahran, M.A.; Wills, A.J. The Vegetation of Egypt; Chapman Hall: London, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  21. Pradhan, N.K.; Ghosal, S.C.I.; Jussiaea Repens, L. Is a Nontoxic Antigonadal Herb- a Dose Dependent Study on Male Rates. Int. J. Pharm. Bio Sci. 2013, 4, 131–143. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang, M.; Yin, Q.; Ji, X.; Wang, F.; Gao, X.; Zhao, M. High and fast adsorption of Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions from aqueous solutions by a waste biomass based hydrogel. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tackholm, V. Students’ Flora of Egypt, 2nd ed.; Cairo University Press: Cairo, Egypt, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  24. Boulos, L. Flora of Egypt; Al Hadara Publishing: Cairo, Egypt, 2000; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kumar, P.S.; Ramalingam, S.; Senthamarai, C.; Niranjanaa, M.; Vijayalakshmi, P.; Sivanesan, S. Adsorption of dye from aqueous solution by cashew nut shell: Studies on equilibrium isotherm, kinetics and thermodynamics of interactions. Desalination 2010, 261, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Torab-Mostaedi, M. Biosorption of Lanthanum and Cerium from Aqueous Solutions Using Tangerine (Citrus Reticulata) Peel: Equilibrium, Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies. Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q/CICEQ 2013, 19, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mariño, M.; Da Silva, L.L.; Durán, N.; Tasic, L. Enhanced Materials from Nature: Nanocellulose from Citrus Waste. Molecules 2015, 20, 5908–5923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Saxena, A.; Bhardwaj, M.; Allen, T.; Kumar, S.; Sahney, R. Adsorption of heavy metals from wastewater using agricultural–industrial wastes as biosorbents. Water Sci. 2017, 31, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Sain, M.; Panthapulakkal, S. Bioprocess preparation of wheat straw fibers and their characterization. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2006, 23, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Manzoor, K.; Ahmad, M.; Ahmad, S.I. Removal of Pb(ii) and Cd(ii) from Wastewater Using Arginine Cross-Linked Chitosan–carboxymethyl Cellulose Beads as Green Adsorbent. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 7890–7902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Abdić, Š.; Memić, M.; Šabanović, E.; Sulejmanović, J.; Begić, S. Adsorptive removal of eight heavy metals from aqueous solution by unmodified and modified agricultural waste: Tangerine peel. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 15, 2511–2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Al-Ghouti, M.A.; Da’Ana, D.; Abu-Dieyeh, M.; Khraisheh, M. Adsorptive removal of mercury from water by adsorbents derived from date pits. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 15327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Morosanu, I.; Teodosiu, C.; Paduraru, C.; Ibanescu, D.; Tofan, L. Biosorption of lead ions from aqueous effluents by rapeseed biomass. New Biotechnol. 2017, 39, 110–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Semerjian, L. Removal of heavy metals (Cu, Pb) from aqueous solutions using pine (Pinus halepensis) sawdust: Equilibrium, kinetic, and thermodynamic studies. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2018, 12, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Samra, S. Biosorption of Pb2+ from Natural Water Using Date Pits: A Green Chemistry Approach. Mod. Chem. Appl. 2014, 2, 1000131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Ahmad, A.; Rafatullah, M.; Sulaiman, O.; Ibrahim, M.; Hashim, R. Scavenging behaviour of meranti sawdust in the removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chaudhry, S.A.; Zaidi, Z.; Siddiqui, S.I. Isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamics of arsenic adsorption onto Iron-Zirconium Binary Oxide-Coated Sand (IZBOCS): Modelling and process optimization. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 229, 230–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gupta, V.K.; Ali, I.; Saleh, T.; Nayak, A.; Agarwal, S. Chemical treatment technologies for waste-water recycling—an overview. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 6380–6388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chao, H.-P.; Chang, C.-C. Adsorption of copper(II), cadmium(II), nickel(II) and lead(II) from aqueous solution using biosorbents. Adsorption 2012, 18, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cheng, Q.; Fang, Z.; Yi, X.; An, X.; Tang, B.; Xu, Y. “Ex Situ” Concept for toughening the RTmable BMI matrix composites, part I: Improving the interlaminar fracture toughness. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Attari, M.; Bukhari, S.S.; Kazemian, H.; Rohani, S. A low-cost adsorbent from coal fly ash for mercury removal from industrial wastewater. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Langergren, S.; Svenska, B.K. Zur Theorie Der Sogenannten Adsorption Geloester Stoffe. Veternskapsakad Handl. 1898, 24, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  43. Senthil Kumar, P.; Gayathri, R. Adsorption of Pb2+ Ions from Aqueous Solutions onto Bael Tree Leaf Powder: Isotherms, Kinetics and Thermodynamics Study. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2009, 4, 381–399. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang, Q.; Zheng, C.; Shen, Z.; Lu, Q.; He, C.; Zhang, T.C.; Liu, J. Polyethyleneimine and carbon disulfide co-modified alkaline lignin for removal of Pb2 + ions from water. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 359, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Adhiambo, O.R.; Lusweti, K.J.; Morang’A, G.Z. Biosorption of Pb2+ and Cr2+ Using Moringa Oleifera and Their Adsorption Isotherms. Sci. J. Anal. Chem. 2015, 3, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Xu, X.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, S.; Cheng, Z.; Yang, Z.; Xian, J.; Yang, Y. Adsorption of Cr6+ and Pb2+ on Soy Sauce Residue Biochar from Aqueous Solution. BioResources 2019, 14, 4653–4669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Babu, B.V. Adsorption of Cr (VI) by a Low-Cost Adsorbent Prepared from Neem Leaves. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 2006, 1, 175–180. [Google Scholar]
  48. Saueprasearsit, P. Adsorption of Chromium (Cr+6) Using Durian Peel. 2011 Int. Conf. Biotechnol. Environ. Manag. IPCBEE 2011, 18, 33–38. [Google Scholar]
  49. EL-kady, M.F.; EL-aassar, M.R.; Ibrahim, M.S.; El batrawy, O.A.; Hassan, H.S.; Fakhry, H. Equilibrium and Kinetic Behaviors of Cationic Dye Decolorization Using Poly (AN-co-Py)/ZrO2 Novel Nanopolymeric Composites. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2018, 37, 740–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ozacar, M.; Şengil, I. A kinetic study of metal complex dye sorption onto pine sawdust. Process. Biochem. 2005, 40, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Crini, G.; Peindy, H.N.; Gimbert, F.; Capucine, R. Removal of C. I. Basic Green 4 (Malachite Green) from Aqueous Solutions by Adsorption Using Cyclodextrin-Based Adsorbent: Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 53, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Poots, V.J.P.; McKay, G.; Healy, J.J. Removal of Basic Dye from Effluent Using Wood as an Adsorbent. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1978, 50, 926–939. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. SEM images of the used bio-sorbent L. stolonifera root (A) and shoot (D), before the bio-sorption process, (B,C) represent root and shoot cells after bio-sorption of Cr6+ and (E,F) of root and shoot cells after bio-sorption of Pb2+.
Figure 1. SEM images of the used bio-sorbent L. stolonifera root (A) and shoot (D), before the bio-sorption process, (B,C) represent root and shoot cells after bio-sorption of Cr6+ and (E,F) of root and shoot cells after bio-sorption of Pb2+.
Sustainability 13 06390 g001
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of the used bio-sorbent L. stolonifera (root and shoot) before and after bio-sorption of Cr6+ and Pb2+ metal ions.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of the used bio-sorbent L. stolonifera (root and shoot) before and after bio-sorption of Cr6+ and Pb2+ metal ions.
Sustainability 13 06390 g002
Figure 3. Effect of Contact Time (a), pH (b), Pb2+ and Cr6+ metal ions concentration (c,d), and biomass dosage root and shoot (e,f) respectively.
Figure 3. Effect of Contact Time (a), pH (b), Pb2+ and Cr6+ metal ions concentration (c,d), and biomass dosage root and shoot (e,f) respectively.
Sustainability 13 06390 g003
Figure 4. Adsorption isotherm models of Pb2+ and Cr6+ metal ions onto of the used bio-sorbent (L. stolonifera) (a) Langmuir, (b) Freundlich, and (c) Temkin.
Figure 4. Adsorption isotherm models of Pb2+ and Cr6+ metal ions onto of the used bio-sorbent (L. stolonifera) (a) Langmuir, (b) Freundlich, and (c) Temkin.
Sustainability 13 06390 g004
Figure 5. First-order plots (a), Second-order plots (b), Elovich plots (c), and Intra-particle diffusion plots (d) for bio-sorption of Cr6+, and Pb2+ onto the used bio-sorbent (L. stolonifera) roots and shoots.
Figure 5. First-order plots (a), Second-order plots (b), Elovich plots (c), and Intra-particle diffusion plots (d) for bio-sorption of Cr6+, and Pb2+ onto the used bio-sorbent (L. stolonifera) roots and shoots.
Sustainability 13 06390 g005
Table 1. Adsorption equilibrium models applied in the present study.
Table 1. Adsorption equilibrium models applied in the present study.
Bio-Sorption ModelsEquationParameters
LangmuirCe/qe = 1/qmK + Ce/qm
C e q e = 1 q m K l + C e q m
qe is the bio-sorbate amount in the bio-sorbent at equilibrium (mg/g), qm is the maximum monolayer coverage capacities (mg/g), Kl is the Langmuir constant (L/mg), and Ce is the equilibrium concentration (mg/L).
Freundlichln qe = ln KF + 1/nf ln ce
l n q e = l n K F + 1 n f l n C e
qe is the of bio-sorbed ions amount at equilibrium (mg/g); Ce is the bio-sorbate equilibrium ions concentration (mg/L); KF and nf are Freundlich constants related to the bio-sorption capacity and bio-sorption intensity, respectively
Temkinq e = B ln KT + B ln CeKT is the Temkin constant refer to equilibrium maximum binding energy and B is the Temkin constant related to bio-sorption heat.
Table 2. Parameters of bio-sorption isotherm models.
Table 2. Parameters of bio-sorption isotherm models.
Isotherm ParametersCr6+Pb2+
RootShootRootShoot
Langmuir
qm (mg g−1) calculated43.47825.64180.79665.519
KL (L mg−1)0.0560.0450.0180.017
R20.9750.9440.9880.992
Freundlich
KF (mg1−1/n L1/n g−1)6.61911.6586.0564.926
nf3.0745.9132.3522.369
R20.8520.9790.9900.952
Temkin
BT (L mg−1)8.2103.48314.59012.507
KT (KJ mol−1)0.56623.1690.2980.239
R20.8310.5310.9760.989
Table 4. Bio-sorption kinetic models equations.
Table 4. Bio-sorption kinetic models equations.
Bio-Sorption Kinetic ModelsEquationParameters
Pseudo-First-OrderLn (qe-qt) =ln qe- K1tqt is the bio-sorbed metal ions amount at time t, qe, is the bio-sorbed metal ions amount at equilibrium (mg/g). k1 (min−1) is the first-order reaction rate constant
Pseudo-Second-Ordert/qt = (1/K2qe2)qt is the bio-sorbed metal ions amount at time t qe, the bio-sorbed metal ions amount at equilibrium (mg/g), k2 is the second-order reaction rate equilibrium constant (g/mg min).
Elovichqt = ὰ +ß ln t is the initial sorption rate (mg/g min) and ß is the extent of surface coverage and activation energy for chemisorption (g/mg)
Intra-particle Diffusionqt = kidt1/2+ Ikid is the intra-particle diffusion rate constant, and I give prediction about the boundary layer thickness
Table 5. Parameters obtained from different kinetic models for bio-sorption of Cr6+, and Pb2+ onto the used bio-sorbent (L. stolonifera) roots and shoots.
Table 5. Parameters obtained from different kinetic models for bio-sorption of Cr6+, and Pb2+ onto the used bio-sorbent (L. stolonifera) roots and shoots.
Kinetic Model Cr6+Pb2+
RootShootRootShoot
Pseudo-First-Orderqe (mg/g) Calculated12.5417.4783.7122.335
qe (mg/g) Experimental14.74814.52315.83816.625
k1 (min−1)0.0130.0090.0060.005
R20.9380.8300.6930.193
Pseudo-Second-Orderqe (mg/g) Calculated16.94416.31316.80715.625
qe (mg/g) Experimental14.74814.52315.83816.625
k2 (g/mg min)0.0380.0440.0810.247
R20.9900.9990.9910.998
Elovichß (g/mg)3.3473.2661.9801.248
(mg/g min)3.8993.2025.6559.360
R20.9770.9710.9280.657
Intra-particle Diffusionkid,0.7790.7260.4400.249
I2.7073.5749.79412.227
R20.9710.9380.8250.477
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

El-Amier, Y.A.; Elsayed, A.; El-Esawi, M.A.; Noureldeen, A.; Darwish, H.; Fakhry, H. Optimizing the Biosorption Behavior of Ludwigia stolonifera in the Removal of Lead and Chromium Metal Ions from Synthetic Wastewater. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6390. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116390

AMA Style

El-Amier YA, Elsayed A, El-Esawi MA, Noureldeen A, Darwish H, Fakhry H. Optimizing the Biosorption Behavior of Ludwigia stolonifera in the Removal of Lead and Chromium Metal Ions from Synthetic Wastewater. Sustainability. 2021; 13(11):6390. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116390

Chicago/Turabian Style

El-Amier, Yasser A., Ashraf Elsayed, Mohamed A. El-Esawi, Ahmed Noureldeen, Hadeer Darwish, and Hala Fakhry. 2021. "Optimizing the Biosorption Behavior of Ludwigia stolonifera in the Removal of Lead and Chromium Metal Ions from Synthetic Wastewater" Sustainability 13, no. 11: 6390. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116390

APA Style

El-Amier, Y. A., Elsayed, A., El-Esawi, M. A., Noureldeen, A., Darwish, H., & Fakhry, H. (2021). Optimizing the Biosorption Behavior of Ludwigia stolonifera in the Removal of Lead and Chromium Metal Ions from Synthetic Wastewater. Sustainability, 13(11), 6390. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116390

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop