Applications of Blockchain Technology in Sustainable Manufacturing and Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- What are the applications of blockchain technology in sustainable manufacturing?
- How can blockchain attributes enhance the sustainable performance of manufacturers?
2. Background of Blockchain Technology Concept
2.1. Overview of Blockchain Technology
2.2. Applications of Blockchain Technology
2.3. Benefits of Blockchain in the Manufacturing Sector
3. Manufacturing Process
4. Systematic Review Protocol
4.1. Database and Search Terms
4.2. Article Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
4.3. Search Results
5. Applications of Blockchain in Sustainable Manufacturing
5.1. Economic Performance
5.1.1. Reliability
5.1.2. Responsiveness
5.1.3. Flexibility
5.1.4. Financial Performance
5.1.5. Quality
5.2. Environmental Performance
5.2.1. Environmental Management
5.2.2. Use of Resources
5.2.3. Pollution
5.2.4. Dangerousness
5.2.5. Natural Environment
5.3. Social Performance
5.3.1. Work Conditions
5.3.2. Human Rights
5.3.3. Societal Commitment
5.3.4. Customer Issues
5.3.5. Business Practices
6. Conclusions and Future Research
- The identified contributions of blockchain to sustainability are interrelated. Future studies are needed to use mind mapping or interpretive structural modelling to map the interrelationships among sustainable applications of blockchain technology.
- The focus of most of the reviewed studies was not sustainability, and they mentioned the contributions of blockchain technology to sustainable manufacturing as a part of the article. It is essential to promote research on the implications of blockchain technology on sustainable performance.
- In comparison to economic and environmental dimensions of sustainability, the social dimension has appeared in less studies in the blockchain literature. Future studies are recommended to explore the contributions of blockchain technology to the social performance of manufacturing firms.
- There is a lack of empirical study on the real influence of blockchain technology adoption on the sustainable performance of firms. Future studies are required to test the association between blockchain adoption and sustainable performance empirically.
- The challenges and determinants of adopting blockchain technology for sustainability purposes have received less attention in the literature, and future studies are needed to address the gap.
- The applications of blockchain technology to sustainable performance may vary in different sectors. Future studies are recommended to investigate the potential contributions of blockchain technologies to the sustainable performance of firms in different sectors.
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Source | Year | Description |
---|---|---|
Kshetri et al. [14] | 2021 | The study described how blockchain could help various stakeholders address many challenges in promoting sustainable supply chains in developing countries. |
Park and Li [62] | 2021 | The study elaborated on the implications of blockchain technology in sustainable performance in the areas of environmental protection, social equity, and governance efficiency. |
Katsikouli et al. [66] | 2021 | The study discussed the use of blockchain technology and distributed ledgers to manage supply chains in the food sector. The role of blockchain technology in addressing the challenges of typical food management systems was elaborated. |
Upadhyay et al. [8] | 2021 | The study discussed the contributions of blockchain technology to the circular economy through the lens of sustainability and social responsibility. |
Saurabh and Dey [22] | 2021 | The benefits of blockchain technology in agri-food supply chains that promote the adoption of blockchain in this sector were discussed. |
Badhotiya et al. [26] | 2021 | The study investigated the benefits and challenges of integrating blockchain into pharmaceutical supply chains. |
Agrawal et al. [46] | 2021 | The study investigated a blockchain-based traceability framework for traceability in multi-tier textiles and discussed the opportunities blockchain technology creates for a sustainable supply chain. |
Ali et al. [27] | 2021 | The contributions of blockchain technology to halal sustainable production were discussed. |
Ebinger and Omondi [29] | 2020 | The article gave an overview of the current applications of digital technologies, including blockchain technology, artificial intelligence, and cloud computing, in sustainable supply chain management. |
Esmaeilian et al. [19] | 2020 | The study unfolded the capabilities that blockchain offers for increasing sustainability under four main areas: (1) design of incentive mechanisms and tokenisation to promote consumers’ green behaviour; (2) enhance visibility across the entire product lifecycle; (3) increase systems efficiency while decreasing development and operational costs; and (4) foster sustainability monitoring and reporting performance across supply chain networks. |
Leng et al. [15] | 2020 | The study investigated how blockchain can overcome potential barriers to achieving sustainability from two perspectives: the manufacturing system perspective and the product lifecycle management perspective. |
Manupati et al. [55] | 2020 | The study proposed a blockchain approach for monitoring supply chain performance and optimising both emission levels and operational costs in a synchronised fashion, producing a better outcome for the supply chains. |
Rejeb and Rejeb [64] | 2020 | The study discussed the economic, social, and environmental value of blockchain for all stakeholders involved in supply chains. |
Schulz et al. [65] | 2020 | The study provided an exploratory assessment of how blockchain technology may support, hinder and/or re-shape sustainability transformations in selected areas of sustainable development. |
Venkatesh et al. [18] | 2020 | The study developed a system architecture that integrates the use of blockchain, internet-of-things (IoT) and big data analytics to allow sellers to monitor their supply chain social sustainability efficiently and effectively. |
Vujičić et al. [59] | 2020 | The paper discussed the possible applications of blockchain technology for environmental sustainability in the shipping industry. |
Roeck et al. [52] | 2020 | The study elaborated on the implications of blockchain technology to the transaction costs of supply chains. |
Alles and Gray [58] | 2020 | The study modelled the business process within which blockchain applications operate in order to extract an endogenous demand for auditing in that environment. |
Saberi et al. [1] | 2019 | The paper critically examined blockchain technology and explained the potential application of blockchain to sustainable supply chain management. |
Ko et al. [13] | 2018 | The study explained how firms could employ distributed ledger technology by adopting blockchain technology to achieve real-time transparency and cost savings. The blockchain’s mechanism for enabling real-time transparency and cost savings in the manufacturing industry was elaborated. |
Fu et al. [17] | 2018 | The study proposed a blockchain supported environmentally sustainable solution for the fashion apparel manufacturing industry. |
References
- Saberi, S.; Kouhizadeh, M.; Sarkis, J.; Shen, L. Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 2117–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Braccini, A.; Margherita, E. Exploring Organizational Sustainability of Industry 4.0 under the Triple Bottom Line: The Case of a Manufacturing Company. Sustainability 2018, 11, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ghobakhloo, M. Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 252, 119869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vrchota, J.; Pech, M.; Rolínek, L.; Bednář, J. Sustainability Outcomes of Green Processes in Relation to Industry 4.0 in Manufacturing: Systematic Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaharudin, M.R.; Govindan, K.; Zailani, S.; Tan, K.C.; Iranmanesh, M. Product return management: Linking product returns, closed-loop supply chain activities and the effectiveness of the reverse supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 149, 1144–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, G.; Luthra, S.; Huisingh, D.; Mangla, S.K.; Narkhede, B.E.; Liu, Y. Development of a lean manufacturing framework to enhance its adoption within manufacturing companies in developing economies. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 245, 118726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, E.-J.; Kang, H.-G.; Bae, K. A Study on the Sustainable Development of NPOs with Blockchain Technology. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Upadhyay, A.; Mukhuty, S.; Kumar, V.; Kazancoglu, Y. Blockchain technology and the circular economy: Implications for sustainability and social responsibility. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 293, 126130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin: A Peer to Peer Electronic Cash System. 2008. Available online: https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/training/annual-national-training-seminar/2018/Emerging_Tech_Bitcoin_Crypto.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2021).
- Zheng, W.; Zheng, Z.; Dai, H.-N.; Chen, X.; Zheng, P. XBlock-EOS: Extracting and exploring blockchain data from EOSIO. Inf. Process. Manag. 2021, 58, 102477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Francisco, K.; Swanson, D. The Supply Chain Has No Clothes: Technology Adoption of Blockchain for Supply Chain Transparency. Logistics 2018, 2, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- KPMG LLP. Blockchain and the Future of Finance: A Potential New World for CFOs—and How to Prepare; KPMG: Amstelveen, The Netherlnads, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ko, T.; Lee, J.; Ryu, D. Blockchain Technology and Manufacturing Industry: Real-Time Transparency and Cost Savings. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kshetri, N. Blockchain and sustainable supply chain management in developing countries. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 60, 102376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leng, J.; Ruan, G.; Jiang, P.; Xu, K.; Liu, Q.; Zhou, X.; Liu, C. Blockchain-empowered sustainable manufacturing and product lifecycle management in industry 4.0: A survey. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 132, 110112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giungato, P.; Rana, R.; Tarabella, A.; Tricase, C. Current Trends in Sustainability of Bitcoins and Related Blockchain Technology. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fu, B.; Shu, Z.; Liu, X. Blockchain Enhanced Emission Trading Framework in Fashion Apparel Manufacturing Industry. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Venkatesh, V.G.; Kang, K.; Wang, B.; Zhong, R.Y.; Zhang, A. System architecture for blockchain based transparency of supply chain social sustainability. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2020, 63, 101896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esmaeilian, B.; Sarkis, J.; Lewis, K.; Behdad, S. Blockchain for the future of sustainable supply chain management in Industry 4.0. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 163, 105064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leng, J.; Ye, S.; Zhou, M.; Zhao, J.L.; Liu, Q.; Guo, W.; Cao, W.; Fu, L. Blockchain-Secured Smart Manufacturing in Industry 4.0: A Survey. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2021, 51, 237–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sundarakani, B.; Ajaykumar, A.; Gunasekaran, A. Big data driven supply chain design and applications for blockchain: An action research using case study approach. Omega 2021, 102452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saurabh, S.; Dey, K. Blockchain technology adoption, architecture, and sustainable agri-food supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 284, 124731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abeyratne, S.A.; Monfared, R.P. Blockchain Ready Manufacturing Supply Chain Using Distributed Ledger. Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol. 2016, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, M.; Zhang, J. Research on the application of block chain big data platform in the construction of new smart city for low carbon emission and green environment. Comput. Commun. 2020, 149, 332–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, N.; Al-Jaroodi, J. Applying Blockchain in Industry 4.0 Applications. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 9th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 7–9 January 2019; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 852–858. [Google Scholar]
- Badhotiya, G.K.; Sharma, V.P.; Prakash, S.; Kalluri, V.; Singh, R. Investigation and assessment of blockchain technology adoption in the pharmaceutical supply chain. Mater. Today Proc. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.H.; Chung, L.; Kumar, A.; Zailani, S.; Tan, K.H. A sustainable Blockchain framework for the halal food supply chain: Lessons from Malaysia. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 170, 120870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Bellavitis, C. Blockchain disruption and decentralized finance: The rise of decentralized business models. J. Bus. Ventur. Insights 2020, 13, e00151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ebinger, F.; Omondi, B. Leveraging Digital Approaches for Transparency in Sustainable Supply Chains: A Conceptual Paper. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skilton, P.F.; Robinson, J.L. Traceability and normal accident theory: How does supply network complexity influence the traceability of adverse events? J. Supply Chain Manag. 2009, 45, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dissanayake, C.K.; Cross, J.A. Systematic mechanism for identifying the relative impact of supply chain performance areas on the overall supply chain performance using SCOR model and SEM. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, 201, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayyildiz, E.; Taskin Gumus, A. Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy AHP method-based supply chain performance evaluation by a new extension of SCOR model: SCOR 4.0. Complex. Intell. Syst. 2021, 7, 559–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chehbi-Gamoura, S.; Derrouiche, R.; Damand, D.; Barth, M. Insights from big Data Analytics in supply chain management: An all-inclusive literature review using the SCOR model. Prod. Plan. Control. 2020, 31, 355–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sundarakani, B.; Abdul Razzak, H.; Manikandan, S. Creating a competitive advantage in the global flight catering supply chain: A case study using SCOR model. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2018, 21, 481–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Krishnan, R.; Yen, P.; Agarwal, R.; Arshinder, K.; Bajada, C. Collaborative innovation and sustainability in the food supply chain- evidence from farmer producer organisations. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 168, 105253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Georgise, F.B.; Wuest, T.; Thoben, K.-D. SCOR model application in developing countries: Challenges & requirements. Prod. Plan. Control. 2017, 28, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- PRISMA Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Available online: http://www.prisma-statement.org (accessed on 25 May 2021).
- Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 2003, 14, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwary, D.A. A corpus and a concordancer of academic journal articles. Data Br. 2018, 16, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chardine-Baumann, E.; Botta-Genoulaz, V. A framework for sustainable performance assessment of supply chain management practices. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2014, 76, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govindan, K.; Jha, P.C.; Garg, K. Product recovery optimization in closed-loop supply chain to improve sustainability in manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2016, 54, 1463–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pham, D.T.; Thomas, A.J. Fit manufacturing: A framework for sustainability. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2011, 23, 103–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, A.; Badurdeen, F. Sustainable Manufacturing Performance Evaluation: Integrating Product and Process Metrics for Systems Level Assessment. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 8, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Longo, F.; Nicoletti, L.; Padovano, A.; D’Atri, G.; Forte, M. Blockchain-enabled supply chain: An experimental study. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 136, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saad, M.H.; Nazzal, M.A.; Darras, B.M. A general framework for sustainability assessment of manufacturing processes. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 97, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agrawal, T.K.; Kumar, V.; Pal, R.; Wang, L.; Chen, Y. Blockchain-based framework for supply chain traceability: A case example of textile and clothing industry. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 154, 107130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hicks, B.J.; Matthews, J. The barriers to realising sustainable process improvement: A root cause analysis of paradigms for manufacturing systems improvement. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2010, 23, 585–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Garbie, I.H. An analytical technique to model and assess sustainable development index in manufacturing enterprises. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2014, 52, 4876–4915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, H.X.; Yeo, Z.; Ng, R.; Tjandra, T.B.; Song, B. A Sustainability Indicator Framework for Singapore Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Enterprises. Procedia CIRP 2015, 29, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, D.; Heyer, S.; Ibbotson, S.; Salonitis, K.; Steingrímsson, J.G.; Thiede, S. Direct digital manufacturing: Definition, evolution, and sustainability implications. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 107, 615–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamble, S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Dhone, N.C. Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing practices for sustainable organisational performance in Indian manufacturing companies. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 1319–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roeck, D.; Sternberg, H.; Hofmann, E. Distributed ledger technology in supply chains: A transaction cost perspective. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 2124–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eslami, Y.; Dassisti, M.; Lezoche, M.; Panetto, H. A survey on sustainability in manufacturing organisations: Dimensions and future insights. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 5194–5214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ikram, M.; Zhou, P.; Shah, S.A.A.; Liu, G.Q. Do environmental management systems help improve corporate sustainable development? Evidence from manufacturing companies in Pakistan. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 226, 628–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manupati, V.K.; Schoenherr, T.; Ramkumar, M.; Wagner, S.M.; Pabba, S.K.; Inder Raj Singh, R. A blockchain-based approach for a multi-echelon sustainable supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 2222–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, N.; Chaim, O.; Cazarini, E.; Gerolamo, M. Manufacturing in the fourth industrial revolution: A positive prospect in Sustainable Manufacturing. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 21, 671–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mani, M.; Madan, J.; Lee, J.H.; Lyons, K.W.; Gupta, S.K. Sustainability characterisation for manufacturing processes. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2014, 52, 5895–5912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alles, M.; Gray, G.L. “The first mile problem”: Deriving an endogenous demand for auditing in blockchain-based business processes. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 2020, 38, 100465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vujičić, S.; Hasanspahić, N.; Car, M.; Čampara, L. Distributed Ledger Technology as a Tool for Environmental Sustainability in the Shipping Industry. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumgartner, R.J.; Ebner, D. Corporate sustainability strategies: Sustainability profiles and maturity levels. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 18, 76–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varsei, M.; Soosay, C.; Fahimnia, B.; Sarkis, J. Framing sustainability performance of supply chains with multidimensional indicators. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2014, 19, 242–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, A.; Li, H. The Effect of Blockchain Technology on Supply Chain Sustainability Performances. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutherland, J.W.; Richter, J.S.; Hutchins, M.J.; Dornfeld, D.; Dzombak, R.; Mangold, J.; Robinson, S.; Hauschild, M.Z.; Bonou, A.; Schönsleben, P.; et al. The role of manufacturing in affecting the social dimension of sustainability. CIRP Ann. 2016, 65, 689–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rejeb, A.; Rejeb, K. Blockchain and supply chain sustainability. Logforum 2020, 16, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulz, K.A.; Gstrein, O.J.; Zwitter, A.J. Exploring the governance and implementation of sustainable development initiatives through blockchain technology. Futures 2020, 122, 102611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katsikouli, P.; Wilde, A.S.; Dragoni, N.; Høgh-Jensen, H. On the benefits and challenges of blockchains for managing food supply chains. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 2175–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fields | Subfields | Blockchain Contributions |
---|---|---|
Reliability |
|
|
Responsiveness |
|
|
Flexibility |
|
|
Financial Performance |
|
|
Quality |
|
|
Fields | Subfields | Blockchain Contributions |
---|---|---|
Environmental Management |
|
|
Use of Resources |
|
|
Pollution |
|
|
Dangerousness |
|
|
Natural Environment |
|
|
Fields | Subfields | Blockchain Contributions |
---|---|---|
Work Conditions |
|
|
Human Rights |
|
|
Societal Commitment |
|
|
Customer Issues |
|
|
Business Practices |
|
|
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Khanfar, A.A.A.; Iranmanesh, M.; Ghobakhloo, M.; Senali, M.G.; Fathi, M. Applications of Blockchain Technology in Sustainable Manufacturing and Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7870. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147870
Khanfar AAA, Iranmanesh M, Ghobakhloo M, Senali MG, Fathi M. Applications of Blockchain Technology in Sustainable Manufacturing and Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Review. Sustainability. 2021; 13(14):7870. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147870
Chicago/Turabian StyleKhanfar, Ahmad A. A., Mohammad Iranmanesh, Morteza Ghobakhloo, Madugoda Gunaratnege Senali, and Masood Fathi. 2021. "Applications of Blockchain Technology in Sustainable Manufacturing and Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Review" Sustainability 13, no. 14: 7870. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147870
APA StyleKhanfar, A. A. A., Iranmanesh, M., Ghobakhloo, M., Senali, M. G., & Fathi, M. (2021). Applications of Blockchain Technology in Sustainable Manufacturing and Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 13(14), 7870. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147870