Organization’s Sustainable Operational Complexity and Strategic Overview: TISM Approach and Asian Case Studies
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Regional Complexities: An Overview
1.2. Context of the Study
1.3. Rationale of Asian Regional Study
2. Literature Review
- (i)
- Imperatives of operational excellence;
- (ii)
- Organizational Strategic Inheritance;
- (iii)
- Resilience and regional development;
- (iv)
- Theoretical background: Institutionalist approach.
2.1. Imperatives of Operational Excellence
2.2. Strategic Organizational Inheritance
2.3. Resilience and Regional Development
2.4. Theoretical Background: Institutionalist Approach
3. The Methodology of the Study
3.1. Case Study Method
3.2. Total Interpretive Structural Modeling
3.3. Poisson Situation
3.4. Goodness of Fit Test
3.5. Data
4. Case Diagnostic Criteria and Background for Case Studies
4.1. Attributes of Sustainable Operational Decisions
4.2. Macro-Economic Criteria: Business Opportunities
4.3. Poisson Situation
4.4. Overall Customer Needs
4.5. Channel Enhancement
4.6. Functional Training
4.7. Technology Integration
4.8. Opportunity Loss
4.9. Urban Infrastructure
4.10. Purposeful Design
5. Application of TISM
6. Testing of the Framework Study
Asian Regional Study Result Analysis
7. Implications
- Social value expenditure positively signifies the operating activities of an organisation.
- Efficient machinery and plants in manufacturing activities had positively signified enterprise operation excellence.
- Be it profit, total turnover, or total sales, such returns are an outcome of enterprise operational excellence practices cultivated over time through experience and R&D practices. Hence, both workforce (SVE) and investing activities (plant and machinery) are visible as both sides of a single coin to achieve enterprise sustainable operational excellence.
7.1. Sustainability Implications from Asian Case Studies
- Environmentally friendly products and services (Operating activities) provide a competitive advantage.
- Incorporating sustainability in employee training (Social Value Expenditure) will increase the organisation internal knowledge.
- Customer connectivity (Social Value Expenditure) through network communications will improve the sustainable operation chances.
7.2. Managerial Implications
8. Discussion
9. Relationship with Conceptual Framework
10. Concluding Remarks
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Operating Activities | Investing Activities | Financing Activities | Social Value Expenditure | Firm_id | Year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
196.72 | 389.9 | 159.38 | 1767.23 | 1 | 2017 |
334.1 | 416.66 | 10.13 | 1600.37 | 1 | 2016 |
364.92 | 85.69 | 374.73 | 1712.83 | 1 | 2015 |
350.8 | 363.53 | 716.81 | 10,066.09 | 1 | 2014 |
321.6 | 141.19 | 576.11 | 8020.3 | 1 | 2013 |
39,699.92 | 24,848.18 | 7263.36 | 63,716.792 | 2 | 2017 |
33,563.93 | 22,761.3 | 5507.32 | 54,145.441 | 2 | 2016 |
30,978.16 | 27,485.36 | 2561.26 | 54,258.115 | 2 | 2015 |
39,131.35 | 37,489.25 | 3466 | 56,656.721 | 2 | 2014 |
31,813.96 | 26,241.72 | 1562.51 | 60,376.108 | 2 | 2013 |
12,139.45 | 12,522.62 | 2914.34 | 15,052.82 | 3 | 2017 |
8426.55 | 11,174.16 | 4823.21 | 15,724.2 | 3 | 2016 |
6297.07 | 9290.21 | 2235.19 | 15,064.98 | 3 | 2015 |
6618.64 | 9820.98 | 3608.05 | 12,966.63 | 3 | 2014 |
3553.25 | 8700.38 | 4141.65 | 10,366.84 | 3 | 2013 |
538.57 | 432.59 | 199.53 | 1052.14 | 4 | 2017 |
441.31 | 188.85 | 173.72 | 823.42 | 4 | 2016 |
339.47 | 133.93 | 186.28 | 664.58 | 4 | 2015 |
227.2 | 414.92 | 182.96 | 484.68 | 4 | 2014 |
247.96 | 269.09 | 5.14 | 390.18 | 4 | 2013 |
5205 | 1603 | 6716 | 9650.13 | 5 | 2017 |
6251 | 4499 | 3255 | 9913.4 | 5 | 2016 |
6652 | 1290 | 2544 | 10,991.19 | 5 | 2015 |
3705 | 2917 | 1154 | 10,563.27 | 5 | 2014 |
4291 | 8005 | 4273 | 8174.52 | 5 | 2013 |
13,941.96 | 3568.41 | 2451.01 | 14,760.85 | 6 | 2017 |
7122.94 | 4128.06 | 1570.38 | 14,074.12 | 6 | 2016 |
7136.97 | 324.76 | 2860.14 | 10,292.64 | 6 | 2015 |
6042.87 | 3793.02 | 1505.98 | 7836.09 | 6 | 2014 |
3264.06 | 1163.13 | 1031.29 | 6812.81 | 6 | 2013 |
386.372 | 936.594 | 917.723 | 2917.874 | 7 | 2017 |
1123.61 | 810.723 | 271.594 | 3052.674 | 7 | 2016 |
2232.126 | 1312.999 | 1593.744 | 2984.032 | 7 | 2015 |
1973.343 | 1228.279 | 1281.248 | 2848.142 | 7 | 2014 |
2161.055 | 1432.14 | 527.311 | 2776.031 | 7 | 2013 |
5368.16 | 1499.94 | 3094.82 | 15,954.8 | 8 | 2017 |
4547.57 | 7609.47 | 3233.24 | 13,857.67 | 8 | 2016 |
4315.24 | 4123.4 | 1910.74 | 15,372.92 | 8 | 2015 |
5307.9 | 2447.92 | 2735.05 | 14,653.34 | 8 | 2014 |
4614.47 | 2274.43 | 2019.63 | 14,230 | 8 | 2013 |
2890.92 | 3519.96 | 456 | 1782.22 | 9 | 2017 |
2065.3 | 2623.39 | 631.74 | 1374.87 | 9 | 2016 |
2027.02 | 2073.71 | 267.44 | 1277.85 | 9 | 2015 |
2240.26 | 1990.71 | 471.2 | 1627.54 | 9 | 2014 |
2206.51 | 1996.01 | 107.14 | 1654.64 | 9 | 2013 |
5722.9 | 3072.01 | 1904.68 | 17,553.41 | 10 | 2017 |
7383.13 | 6642.96 | 240.59 | 18,946.04 | 10 | 2016 |
2788.6 | 5001.13 | 2080.16 | 18,686.07 | 10 | 2015 |
3994.2 | 4466.49 | 299.68 | 20,217.44 | 10 | 2014 |
5304.09 | 5030.92 | 1640.25 | 18,207.64 | 10 | 2013 |
2532.9 | 2943.5 | 224.6 | 14,322.4 | 11 | 2017 |
3005.5 | 2699.7 | 1321.4 | 14,678.1 | 11 | 2016 |
2067.2 | 1605.2 | 137.1 | 15,192.3 | 11 | 2015 |
2098.1 | 1822.7 | 435.8 | 15,041.1 | 11 | 2014 |
1854.4 | 1146.2 | 338.6 | 14,909.4 | 11 | 2013 |
887.84 | 1387.01 | 502.26 | 3307.26 | 12 | 2017 |
459.8 | 588.4 | 1066.36 | 2568.65 | 12 | 2016 |
95.25 | 777.87 | 1123.64 | 111.83 | 12 | 2015 |
149.13 | 172.92 | 71.78 | 1200.98 | 12 | 2014 |
209.65 | 93.52 | 472.23 | 1075.44 | 12 | 2013 |
Administrative Expenses/Employee Benefit Expenses (X) | Other Expenses/Non-operating Expenses/Doubtful Receivables (Y) | Income Tax/Tax Expenses (Z) | Social Value Expenditure (Sum of XYZ) | Social Value Expenditure (In USD Millions) | Firm_id | Year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3558.52 | 8697.42 | 59.22 | 12,315.16 | 1767.23 | 1 | 2017 |
3026.75 | 8041.81 | 83.84 | 11,152.4 | 1600.37 | 1 | 2016 |
3091.46 | 8080.39 | 764.23 | 11,936.08 | 1712.83 | 1 | 2015 |
21,556.42 | 43,825.77 | 4764.79 | 70,146.98 | 10,066.09 | 1 | 2014 |
16,584.05 | 35,535.58 | 3770.99 | 55,890.62 | 8020.30 | 1 | 2013 |
50,075,918 | 1,255,130 | 12,385,744 | 63,716,792 | 63,716.792 | 2 | 2017 |
45,134,348 | 2,124,281 | 6,886,812 | 54,145,441 | 54,145.441 | 2 | 2016 |
44,866,898 | 3,291,288 | 6,099,929 | 54,258,115 | 54,258.115 | 2 | 2015 |
50,253,744 | 2,146,611 | 4,256,366 | 56,656,721 | 56,656.721 | 2 | 2014 |
51,370,553 | 1,529,468 | 7,476,087 | 60,376,108 | 60,376.108 | 2 | 2013 |
1,555,262 | 105,290 | - | 1,660,552 | 15,052.82 | 3 | 2017 |
1,599,243 | 135,372 | - | 1,734,615 | 15,724.20 | 3 | 2016 |
1,544,305 | 117,588 | - | 1,661,893 | 15,064.98 | 3 | 2015 |
1,348,092 | 82,322 | - | 1,430,414 | 12,966.63 | 3 | 2014 |
1,083,372 | 60,246 | - | 1,143,618 | 10,366.84 | 3 | 2013 |
20,481.90 | 47,986.24 | 4851.52 | 73,319.66 | 1052.14 | 4 | 2017 |
17,899.23 | 38,393.71 | 1088.37 | 57,381.31 | 823.42 | 4 | 2016 |
11,886.91 | 30,876.97 | 3548.59 | 46,312.47 | 664.58 | 4 | 2015 |
9289.40 | 24,480.46 | 5.61 | 33,775.47 | 484.68 | 4 | 2014 |
6971.33 | 19,015.34 | 1202.25 | 27,189.92 | 390.18 | 4 | 2013 |
932,607 | 10,581 | 121,366 | 1064,554 | 9650.13 | 5 | 2017 |
1,015,968 | 37,787 | 39,841 | 1093,596 | 9913.40 | 5 | 2016 |
998,751 | 45,411 | 168,331 | 1,212,493 | 10,991.19 | 5 | 2015 |
952,898 | 66,794 | 145,595 | 1,165,287 | 10,563.27 | 5 | 2014 |
889,955 | 5827 | 5990 | 901,772 | 8174.52 | 5 | 2013 |
92,681 | 573 | 8673 | 101,927 | 14,760.85 | 6 | 2017 |
86,442 | 3737 | 7006 | 97,185 | 14,074.12 | 6 | 2016 |
62,281 | 3715 | 5077 | 71,073 | 10,292.64 | 6 | 2015 |
47,468 | 1455 | 5187 | 54,110, | 7836.09 | 6 | 2014 |
38,943 | 3942 | 4159 | 47,044, | 6812.81 | 6 | 2013 |
699,678+1,814,478 | 112,842 | 290,876 | 2,917,874 | 2917.874 | 7 | 2017 |
680,675+1,806,434 | 359,271 | 206,294 | 3,052,674 | 3052.674 | 7 | 2016 |
696,461+1,677,771 | 315,756 | 294,044 | 2,984,032 | 2984.032 | 7 | 2015 |
673,816+1,668,882 | 191,770 | 313,674 | 2,848,142 | 2848.142 | 7 | 2014 |
681,313+1,619,993 | 90,032 | 384,693 | 2,776,031 | 2776.031 | 7 | 2013 |
1,661,212 | 98,024, | 818 | 1,760,054 | 15,954.80 | 8 | 2017 |
1,444,967 | 82,681, | 1061 | 1,528,709 | 1,3857.67 | 8 | 2016 |
1,579,174 | 116,105 | 584 | 1,695,863 | 15,372.92 | 8 | 2015 |
1,497,983 | 118,000 | 500 | 1,616,483 | 14,653.34 | 8 | 2014 |
1,461,144 | 108,088 | 550 | 1,569,782 | 14,230.00 | 8 | 2013 |
4324.60 | 5092.38 | 3002.64 | 12,419.62 | 1782.22 | 9 | 2017 |
3609.32 | 5787.39 | 184.24 | 9580.95 | 1374.87 | 9 | 2016 |
3669.78 | 4979.31 | 255.79 | 8904.88 | 1277.85 | 9 | 2015 |
3867.99 | 4543.85 | 2929.91 | 11,341.75 | 1627.54 | 9 | 2014 |
3360.12 | 4211.22 | 3959.24 | 11,530.58 | 1654.64 | 9 | 2013 |
1,792,278 | 19,014 | 125,112 | 1,936,404 | 17,553.41 | 10 | 2017 |
1,940,363 | 27,594 | 122,075 | 2,090,032 | 18,946.04 | 10 | 2016 |
1,887,901 | 26,913 | 146,540 | 2,061,354 | 18,686.07 | 10 | 2015 |
2,000,028 | 26,107 | 204,152 | 2,230,287 | 20,217.44 | 10 | 2014 |
1,875,052 | 26,707 | 106,816 | 2,008,575 | 18,207.64 | 10 | 2013 |
14,245.7 | - | 76.7 | 14,322.4 | 14,322.4 | 11 | 2017 |
14,557.5 | - | 120.6 | 14,678.1 | 14,678.1 | 11 | 2016 |
15,156.1 | - | 36.2 | 15,192.3 | 15,192.3 | 11 | 2015 |
14,984.6 | - | 56.5 | 15,041.1 | 15,041.1 | 11 | 2014 |
14,869.0 | - | 40.4 | 14,909.4 | 14,909.4 | 11 | 2013 |
7045.50 | 13,853.07 | 2148.55 | 23,047.12 | 3307.26 | 12 | 2017 |
6146.68 | 9204.84 | 2548.48 | 17,900 | 2568.65 | 12 | 2016 |
1997.11 | 4150.84 | 1645.04 | 7792.99 | 111.83 | 12 | 2015 |
1932.03 | 4662.37 | 1774.78 | 8369.18 | 1200.98 | 12 | 2014 |
2085.66 | 3860.93 | 1547.80 | 7494.39 | 1075.44 | 12 | 2013 |
Data Source
References
- Dittmer, L. Globalization and the Asian financial crisis. Asian Perspect. 1999, 23, 45–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.Y. Do Asian values exist? Empirical tests of the four dimensions of Asian values. J. East Asian Stud. 2010, 10, 315–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kausikan, B. Asia’s different standard. Foreign Policy 1993, 92, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmitt, B. The “new wave” in studying Asian markets and consumers. Mark. Lett. 2015, 26, 261–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cheow, E.T. Strategic relevance of Asian economic integration. Econ. Polit. Wkly. 2005, 40, 3960–3967. [Google Scholar]
- Rana, A. Challenges to strategic stability in south Asia. Strateg. Stud. 2018, 38, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- He, K.A. Strategic Functional Theory of Institutions and Rethinking Asian Regionalism: When Do Institutions Matter? Asian Surv. 2014, 54, 1184–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Johnston, T. The Strategic Risks of East Asia’s Slowing Economies. Australian Strategic Policy Institute. August 2017. Available online: https://ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/resources/docs/ASPI-SI120%20The%20strategic%20risks%20of%20East%20Asias%20slowing%20economies.pdf (accessed on 24 August 2019).
- Biao, X.; Wong, T. SARS: Public Health and Social Science Perspectives. Econ. Polit. Wkly. 2003, 38, 2480–2483. [Google Scholar]
- Lam, W.K.; Zhong, N.S.; Tan, W.C. Overview on SARS in Asia and the World. Respirology 2003, 8, S2–S5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hanna, D.; Huang, Y. The Impact of SARS on Asian Economies. Asian Econ. Pap. 2004, 3, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan-Yeung, M.; Seto, W.H.; Sung, J.J.Y. Severe acute respiratory syndrome: Patients were epidemiologically linked. BMJ 2003, 326, 1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Frankenberg, E.; Sikoki, B.; Sumantri, C.; Suriastini, W.; Thomas, D. Education, Vulnerability, And Resilience After a Natural Disaster. Ecol. Soc. J. Integr. Sci. Resil. Sustain. 2013, 18, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gaillard, J.-C.; Clavé, E.; Vibert, O.; Azhari, D.; Denain, J.-C.; Efendi, Y.; Grancher, D.; Liamzon, C.C.; Sari, D.R.; Setiawan, R. Ethnic groups’ response to the 26 December 2004 earthquake and tsunami in Aceh, Indonesia. Nat. Hazards 2008, 47, 17–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kellenberg, D.; Mobarak, A.M. The Economics of Natural Disasters. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 2011, 3, 297–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Low, W.-Y.; Binns, C. Disasters and Public Health Concerns. Asia Pac. J. Public Health 2011, 23, 277–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- United Nations ESCAP. Available online: https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/d8files/knowledge-products/APTIT%20FDI.pdf (accessed on 19 August 2021).
- OECD. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/development/asia-challenges.htm (accessed on 19 August 2021).
- ABD. Available online: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/674421/asian-economic-integration-report-2021.pdf (accessed on 19 August 2021).
- Claessens, S.; Djankov, S.; Xu, L.C. Corporate Performance in the East Asian Financial Crisis. World Bank Res. Obs. 2000, 15, 23–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Silva, C.A.; Ordeñana, X.; Vera-Gilces, P.; Jiménez, A. Global Imbalances: The Role of Institutions, Financial Development and FDI in the Context of Financial Crises. Sustainability 2021, 13, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wisner, J.D.; Fawcett, S.E. Linking Firm Strategy to Operating Decisions Through Performance Measurement. Prod. Inventory Manag. J. 1991, 32, 5. [Google Scholar]
- Sørensen, J.B. The Strength of Corporate Culture and the Reliability of Firm Performance. Adm. Sci. Q. 2002, 47, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Knack, S.; Keefer, P. Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation. Q. J. Econ. 1997, 112, 1251–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larsen, M.M.; Manning, S.; Pedersen, T. The ambivalent effect of complexity on firm performance: A study of the global service provider industry. Long Range Plan. 2019, 52, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Momaya, K.S.; Bhat, S.; Lalwani, L. Institutional Growth and Industrial Competitiveness: Exploring the Role of Strategic Flexibility Taking the Case of Select Institutes in India. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 2017, 18, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharya, S.; Momaya, K.S.; Iyer, K.C. Strategic Change for Growth: A Case of Construction Company in India. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 2012, 13, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dosi, G.; Faillo, M.; Marengo, L. Organizational Capabilities, Patterns of Knowledge Accumulation and Governance Structures in Business Firms: An Introduction. Organ. Stud. 2008, 29, 1165–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Calori, R. Essai: Philosophizing on Strategic Management Models. Organ. Stud. 1998, 19, 281–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van de Ven, A.H.; Rogers, R.W.; Bechara, J.P.; Sun, K. Organizational diversity, integration and performance. J. Organ. Behav. 2008, 29, 335–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yström, A.; Agogué, M.; Rampa, R. Preparing an Organization for Sustainability Transitions—The Making of Boundary Spanners through Design Training. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mueller, G.C.; Mone, M.A.; Barker, V.L. Formal Strategic Analyses and Organizational Performance: Decomposing the Rational Model. Organ. Stud. 2007, 28, 853–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y.; Tan, J.J.; Shenkar, O. Strategic Responses to Competitive Pressure: The Case of Township and Village Enterprises in China. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 1998, 15, 33–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colpan, A.M. Are strategy-performance relationships contingent on macroeconomic environments? Evidence from Japan’s textile industry. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 2007, 25, 635–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Damanpour, F.; Devece, C.; Chen, C.C.; Pothukuchi, V. Organizational culture and partner interaction in the management of international joint ventures in India. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 2010, 29, 453–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Abdallah, C.; Langley, A. The Double Edge of Ambiguity in Strategic Planning. J. Manag. Stud. 2013, 51, 235–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lasserre, P. Corporate strategic management and the overseas Chinese groups. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 1988, 5, 115–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, R.; Sunley, P. On the notion of regional economic resilience: Conceptualization and explanation. J. Econ. Geogr. 2014, 15, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lele, S. Resilience, sustainability environmentalism. Environ. Dev. Econ. 1998, 3, 221–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.; Pervez, A.; Modibbo, U.; Chauhan, J.; Ali, I. Flexible Fuzzy Goal Programming Approach in Optimal Mix of Power Generation for Socio-Economic Sustainability: A Case Study. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, R. Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. J. Econ. Geogr. 2012, 12, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, L.; Constas, M.A.; Matthews, N.; Verkaart, S. Advancing resilience measurement. Nat. Sustain. 2021, 4, 288–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Adamo, I.; Lupi, G. Sustainability and resilience after COVID-19: A circular premium in the fashion industry. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myrdal, G. What is development? J. Econ. Issues 1974, 8, 729–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preston, P.W. Development Theory: An Introduction; Blackwell Publishers Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 1999; pp. 169–173. [Google Scholar]
- Gordon, R.A. Rigor and relevance in a changing institutional setting. Am. Econ. Rev. 1976, 66, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Sushil. SAP-LAP Framework. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 2001, 2, 51–55. [Google Scholar]
- Streeten, P. Unbalanced growth. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 1959, 11, 167–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerring, J.; Ziblatt, D.; Van Gorp, J.; Arevalo, J. An institutional theory of direct and indirect rule. World Polit. 2011, 63, 377–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McClintock, C.C.; Brannon, D.; Maynard-Moody, S. Applying the logic of sample surveys to qualitative case studies: The case cluster method. Adm. Sci. Q. 1979, 24, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lowi, T.J. American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory. World Polit. 1964, 16, 677–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowley, J. Using case studies in research. Manag. Res. News 2002, 25, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Welch, C.; Piekkari, R.; Plakoyiannaki, E.; Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2010, 42, 740–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazdin, A.E. Drawing valid inferences from case studies. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1981, 49, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patton, E.; Appelbaum, S.H. The case for case studies in management research. Manag. Res. News 2003, 26, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Siggelkow, N. Persuasion with case studies. Acad. Manag. J. 2007, 50, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kitchenham, B.; Pickard, L.; Pfleeger, S. Case studies for method and tool evaluation. IEEE Softw. 1995, 12, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stewart, J. Multiple-case study methods in governance-related research. Public Manag. Rev. 2012, 14, 67–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kompier, M.A.; Cooper, C.L.; Geurts, S.A. A multiple case study approach to work stress prevention in Europe. Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol. 2000, 9, 371–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandara, W.; Gable, G.G.; Rosemann, M. Factors and measures of business process modelling: Model building through a multiple case study. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2005, 14, 347–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Walsham, G. Doing interpretive research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2006, 15, 320–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sushil. Interpretive matrix: A tool to aid interpretation of management and social research. Global J. Editor. Flex. Syst. 2005, 6, 27–30. [Google Scholar]
- Sushil. Modified ISM/TISM process with simultaneous transitivity checks for reduced direct pair comparisons. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 2017, 18, 331–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sushil. How to check correctness of total interpretive structural models? Ann. Oper. Res. 2018, 270, 473–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhir, S.; Dhir, S. Modeling of strategic thinking enablers: A modified total interpretive structural modeling (TISM) and MICMAC approach. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 2020, 11, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.; Dhir, S. Modified total interpretive structural modelling of innovation implementation antecedents. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agrawal, A. Modified Total Interpretive Structural Model of Corporate Financial Flexibility. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 2020, 21, 369–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajan, R.; Rana, N.P.; Parameswar, N.; Dhir, S.; Sushil; Dwivedi, Y.K. Developing a modified total interpretive structural model (M-TISM) for organizational strategic cybersecurity management. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 170, 120872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Consul, P.C.; Jain, G.C. A generalization of the Poisson distribution. Technometrics 1973, 15, 791–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thorndike, F. Applications of Poisson’s probability summation. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1926, 5, 604–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsiao, C. Panel data analysis—advantages and challenges. Test 2007, 16, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Plümper, T.; Troeger, V.E.; Manow, P. Panel data analysis in comparative politics: Linking method to theory. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 2005, 44, 327–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woodside, A.G.; Wilson, E.J. Case study research methods for theory building. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2003, 18, 493–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amaratunga, D.; Baldry, D. Case study methodology as a means of theory building: Performance measurement in facilities management organisations. Work. Study 2001, 50, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stiles, W.B. Theory-building case studies of counselling and psychotherapy. Couns. Psychother. Res. 2007, 7, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denoon, D.B.H.; Colbert, E. Challenges for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Pac. Aff. 1998, 71, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hill, H. ASEAN economic development: An analytical survey—The state of the field. J. Asian Stud. 1994, 53, 832–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raipuria, K. ASEAN and SAARC: Select Futuristic Scenarios. Econ. Polit. Wkly. 2002, 37, 3581–3582. [Google Scholar]
- Bandara, J.S.; Yu, W. How Desirable is the South Asian Free Trade Area? A Quantitative Economic Assessment. World Econ. 2003, 26, 1293–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Park, J.H. The East Asian Model of Economic Development and Developing Countries. J. Dev. Soc. 2002, 18, 330–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moghadam, M.R.; Samavati, H.; Dilts, D.A. An Examination of Capital Flight from East Asian Emerging Economies: Paradise Lost. J. Asia-Pac. Bus. 2003, 5, 33–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.-I.; Lau, L.J. The Sources of Economic Growth of the East Asian Newly Industrialized Countries. J. Jpn. Int. Econ. 1994, 8, 235–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canon Annual Report. 2018. Available online: https://global.canon/en/ir/annual/2018/canon-annual-report-2018.pdf (accessed on 11 May 2019).
- Nissan Annual Report. Nissan Motor Corporation Annual Report. 2018. Available online: https://www.nissan-global.com/EN/IR/LIBRARY/AR/2018/ (accessed on 11 May 2019).
- Singapore Airlines Annual Report. Annual Report and Sustainability Report. 2018. Available online: https://www.singaporeair.com/en_UK/us/about-us/information-forinvestors/annual-report/ (accessed on 11 May 2019).
- Moore, J. Channel Strategy. 2021. Available online: https://searchitchannel.techtarget.com/definition/channel-strategy (accessed on 19 August 2021).
- Bappy, M.M.; Ali, S.M.; Kabir, G.; Paul, S.K. Supply chain sustainability assessment with Dempster-Shafer evidence theory: Implications in cleaner production. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 237, 117771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dulia, E.F.; Ali, S.M.; Garshasbi, M.; Kabir, G. Admitting risks towards circular economy practices and strategies: An empirical test from supply chain perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 317, 128420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rabbi, M.; Ali, S.M.; Kabir, G.; Mahtab, Z.; Paul, S.K. Green Supply Chain Performance Prediction Using a Bayesian Belief Network. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Economic Times. Tata Motors Aims to Provide Skill Training to 40k in 3 Years. 2017. Available online: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/tata-motors-aims-to-provide-skill-training-to-40k-in-3-years/articleshow/58912005.cms (accessed on 28 May 2019).
- Huawei Annual Report. 2018. Available online: https://www.huawei.com/en/press-events/annual-report (accessed on 11 May 2019).
- Lutters, E.; Van Houten, F.J.; Bernard, A.; Mermoz, E.; Schutte, C.S. Tools and techniques for product design. CIRP Ann. 2014, 63, 607–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grosfeld-Nir, A.; Ronen, B.; Kozlovsky, N. The Pareto managerial principle: When does it apply? Int. J. Prod. Res. 2007, 45, 2317–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radson, D.; Boyd, A.H. The pareto principle and rate analysis. Qual. Eng. 1997, 10, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, Y.; Kim, K. How Samsung Became a Design Powerhouse. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2015, 93, 73–78. [Google Scholar]
- Lincoln, J.R.; Ahmadjian, C.L.; Mason, E. Organizational Learning and Purchase-Supply Relations in Japan: Hitachi, Matsushita, and Toyota Compared. Calif. Manag. Rev. 1998, 40, 241–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nonala, I.; Kenney, M. Towards a new theory of innovation management: A case study comparing Canon, Inc. and Apple Computer, Inc. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 1991, 8, 67–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dean, J.W., Jr.; Sharfman, M.P. Does Decision Process Matter? A Study of Strategic Decision-Making Effectiveness. Acad. Manag. J. 1996, 39, 368–392. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, H.; Park, S. Relationship between Corporate Sustainability Management and Sustainable Tax Strategies. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, T.K.; Teng, B.-S. Cognitive Biases and Strategic Decision Processes: An Integrative Perspective. J. Manag. Stud. 1999, 36, 757–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Adamo, I.; Gastaldi, M.; Morone, P. The post COVID-19 green recovery in practice: Assessing the profitability of a policy proposal on residential photovoltaic plants. Energy Policy 2020, 147, 111910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cucchiella, F.; D’Adamo, I.; Gastaldi, M. Financial analysis for investment and policy decisions in the renewable energy sector. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2015, 17, 887–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Adamo, I.; Rosa, P. How Do You See Infrastructure? Green Energy to Provide Economic Growth after COVID. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Margherita, E.G.; Braccini, A.M. Industry 4.0 Technologies in flexible manufacturing for sustainable organizational value: Reflections from a multiple case study of italian manufacturers. Inf. Syst. Front. 2020, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Case Organizations (Country) | Industry | Sustainability Values |
---|---|---|
1. Tata Motors (India) | Automotive | Holistic approach and strategic initiative towards sustainability practices |
2. Samsung (South Korea) | Conglomerate | Operating in an ethical manner; certified products with environmental labels |
3. Nissan (Japan) | Automotive | Listening to society and solid understanding towards stakeholders |
4. Indigo (India) | Airlines | Low cost and customer satisfaction and employment opportunities in small cities are the fundamentals for business |
5. Mitsubishi (Japan) | Automotive | Create sustainable corporate value and contributing towards economic development as responsible corporate citizen |
6. Huawei (China) | Telecommunications | creating more social values through ICT (information communication technology) by providing scientific solutions |
7. Wilmar (Singapore) | Food Processing | Strengthen labour practices and sustainability certification |
8. Canon (Japan) | Electronics | A growth strategy based on social and industrial shift; creating new values and solving social issues |
9. NTPC (India) | Electric Utility | Sound corporate practices based on openness, soundness and fairness |
10. Hitachi (Japan) | Conglomerate | Integrating sustainability into their management and business practices |
11. Singapore Airlines (Singapore) | Airline | From farm to plane; supporting local communities and sustainable operation with limited resources |
12. L&T (India) | Conglomerate | Creating value in a socially responsible manner through newer technologies focused on customer requirements |
1-New Synergies for Growth | 2-Business Tie-ups | 3-Price Sensitive Consumers | 4-Technology Integration | 5-Purposeful Design |
(i) Certified products | (i) Growth strategy; Industrial shift | (i) Low cost | (i) Social values through ICT | (i) Certified products |
(ii) Sustainable operations | (ii) Corporate value and economic development | (ii) Fairness in approach | (ii) Social responsibility through newer Technologies | (ii) New products and listening to society |
6-Customer Connectivity | 7-Channel Enhancement | 8-Functional Training | 9-Opportunity Loss | 10-Urban Infrastructure |
(i) Low cost | (i) Strategic initiatives | (i) Labour practices | (i) Openness | (i) Supporting local communities |
(ii) Customer connectivity | (ii) Growth strategy | (ii) Integrating sustainability | (ii) Sound corporate practices | (ii) Creating value |
(iii) Attending customer needs | (iii) Socially responsible manner |
S. No | Firms | Business Strategy and Operating Efficiencies | Opportunities | Planning and Decision | Technology Initiatives | Sustainability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tata Motors | New product development | New geographical markets | To meet customer needs, premium markets. Strong engineering capabilities. | Hybrid and connected vehicles. | Sustainable supply chains. |
2 | Samsung | New dimensions in designs. High quality products | Business platform in the global market particularly in Europe, Pacific Island and Africa. | Job training and improving healthcare. | Cross-discipline thinking and collective knowledge. | Better global society. |
3 | Nissan | Profitable growth. Clear changes in management strategies and directions. | Steady growth (Seven new models per year.) | Revival plan and enhancing the brand | Autonomous drive technologies. | Zero emissions. |
4 | Indigo | Moving forward. Selective new routes and destinations. | Strong economic growth along with continued population growth. | Continue to maintain low-cost measures. (CASK) High frequency flights. | Fleet uniformity. Structural cost advantage by overall maintenance and operations. | Women empowerment and child education. |
5 | Mitsubishi Motors | Demand recovers enhancing business platform. | Emerging countries market. | Responding to global structural changes by bolstering strength. | Automated manual transmissions and flexible fuel vehicles. | Integrity and fairness, responsibility towards society. |
6 | Huawei | Sensible artificial intelligence. Responding to changing needs of people. | A total of 20% people will own more than 10 smart devices; 86% of companies will be using AI. (Artificial Intelligence) | Cutting edge connectivity technologies that work in any scenario. | Integrating new technologies. | Inclusive and sustainable economic growth. |
7 | Wilmar | Food and Non-food applications. | Emerging market demand particularly from Indonesia and India. | Reducing energy consumption. | Food technology, oleo chemical research. | No deforestation, no peat and no exploitation policy. |
8 | Canon | Wide ranging products. Pursuing new possibilities. | Packaging printing and industrial printing. | New synergies for growth. Total solutions. | Discovering new technologies for future. | Environmentally friendly throughout the product lifecycle. |
9 | NTPC | Flexibility in generation of renewable power providing cheaper power. | Increasing self –reliance and diversifying business. | Customer focus. Cleaner power. | Safety in all operations. Reduction in emissions. | Responsible waste dumbing. |
10 | Hitachi | Product range diversification channel expansion. | Energy efficient products customer awareness. | Export led growth particularly to UAE, Middle East, Nepal. | Blockchain and other emerging technologies. | Sustainable society |
11 | Singapore Airlines | Pilot training and joint ventures. | New fleet modernization network growth and expansion. | Bilateral partnership (Vistara, Nokscoot) | Fuel efficiency and Joint ventures | Inclusive sustainable economic growth. |
12 | L&T | International business traction Global growth revival. | Increasing formalization structural reforms. | Enhance return on equity (RoE) | Generating power | Creating sustainable eco-system. |
Element No. | Identified Factors | Contextual Relationship | Interpretation |
---|---|---|---|
O1 | New synergies for growth | A→B means A will help achieve B | |
O2 | Business tie-ups | In what way A will help to achieve B | |
O3 | Price sensitive consumers | ||
O4 | Technology integration | ||
O5 | Purposeful design | ||
O6 | Customer connectivity | ||
O7 | Channel enhancement | ||
O8 | Functional training | ||
O9 | Opportunity loss | ||
O10 | Urban Infrastructure |
O1 | O2 | O3 | O4 | O5 | O6 | O7 | O8 | O9 | O10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1* | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
O2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
O3 | 1* | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1* | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
O4 | 1 | 1* | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1* | 0 | 1 | 0 |
O5 | 1* | 1* | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1* | 1* |
O6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
O7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
O8 | 1* | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1* | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
O9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
O10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
E. No. | Reachability | Antecedent | Intersection | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|
O1 | 1,2,6,7,10 | 1,2,3,4,5,8 | 1,2 | |
O2 | 1,2,6,7,10 | 1,2,4,9 | 1,2 | |
O3 | 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 | 3,5 | 3,5 | |
O4 | 1,2,4,6,7,9 | 3,4,5,9 | 4,9 | |
O5 | 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 | 3,5 | 3,5 | |
O6 | 6,7 | 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 | 6,7 | I |
O7 | 6,7 | 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 | 6,7 | I |
O8 | 1,4,6,7,8,9 | 3,5,8 | 8 | |
O9 | 2,4,6,7,9 | 3,4,9 | 4,9 | |
O10 | 7,10 | 1,2,10 | 10 | |
O1 | 1,2,10 | 1,2,3,4,5,8 | 1,2 | |
O2 | 1,2,10 | 1,2,4,9 | 1,2 | |
O3 | 1,3,4,5,8,9 | 3,5 | 3,5 | |
O4 | 1,2,4,9 | 3,4,5,9 | 4,9 | |
O5 | 1,2,3,4,5,8,9,10 | 3,4,5,9 | 4,9 | |
O8 | 1,4,8,9 | 3,5,8 | 8 | |
O9 | 2,4,9 | 3,4,8,9 | 4,9 | |
O10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | II |
O1 | 1,2 | 1,2,3,4,5,8 | 1,2 | III |
O2 | 1,2 | 1,2,4,9 | 1,2 | III |
O3 | 1,3,4,5,8,9 | 3,5 | 3,5 | |
O4 | 1,2,4,9 | 3,4,5,9 | 4,9 | |
O5 | 1,2,3,4,5,8,9 | 3,5 | 3,5 | |
O8 | 1,4,8,9 | 3,5,8 | 8 | |
O9 | 2,4,9 | 3,4,8,9 | 4,9 | |
O3 | 3,4,5,8,9 | 3,5 | 3,5 | |
O4 | 4,9 | 3,4,5,9 | 4,9 | IV |
O5 | 3,4,5,8,9 | 3,5 | 3,5 | |
O8 | 4,8,9 | 3,5,8 | 8 | |
O9 | 4,9 | 3,4,8,9 | 4,9 | IV |
O3 | 3,5,8 | 3,5 | 3,5 | |
O5 | 3,5,8 | 3,5 | 3,5 | |
O8 | 8 | 3,5,8 | 8 | V |
O3 | 3,5 | 3,5 | 3,5 | VI |
O5 | 3,5 | 3,5 | 3,5 | VI |
S. No | Element No. | Paired Comparison of Reachability Links | Case Organizations |
---|---|---|---|
1 | O1-O2 | Under the philosophy of Kyosei (Excellent global corporation plan) company emphasis on financial health and business reforms. | Canon |
2 | O1-O7 | Expanding business operation through diversification; -The sales and profit grew steadily each year. | Canon |
3 | O1-O10 | Canon institute for global studies draws strategic policies for 3 major areas such as macroeconomic, energy and foreign affairs. | Canon |
4 | O2-O1 | Mitsubishi work with business partners in Japan and overseas that have technology advancement, global capability in terms of IT services, including consulting and system development. | Mitsubishi |
5 | O2-O6 | Value based on consumer needs by providing safe and stable supply of living essentials. | Mitsubishi |
6 | O2-O7 | Focus on Asia and continued to sell new vehicles. | Mitsubishi |
7 | O2-O10 | Business in public with focus on infrastructure transactions. | Mitsubishi |
8 | O3-O4 | Price sensitive consumers will enhance technology integration | Indigo |
9 | O3-O5 | Accommodating and tracking of customers are important in purposeful design | Indigo |
10 | O3-O7 | Low-cost strategy will enhance channel enhancement by connecting more domestic routes. | Indigo |
11 | O3-O8 | Consumers needs are managed and promptly answered through functional training of staffs and front office team. | Indigo |
12 | O3-O9 | Unattended consumers’ needs will lead to opportunity loss | Indigo |
13 | O4-O1 | New technologies including cloud computing, big data, will enhance business opportunities. | Huawei |
14 | O4-O5 | Huawei is working towards developing top smart brand preferred and trusted by consumers. | Huawei |
15 | O4-O6 | Technology integration will enhance customer connectivity | Huawei |
16 | O4-O9 | In technology integration; cost loss, new knowledge will further delay the immediate progress. | Huawei |
17 | O5-O3 | Purposeful design will enhance price sensitive consumers | Samsung |
18 | O5-O4 | New product with integrated features in appliances is a part of technology integration activity. | Samsung |
19 | O5-O6 | Attractive features and combat products will enhance customer base. | Samsung |
20 | O5-O7 | Beautiful designs and purposeful features will cater more demands in markets that will lead to channel enhancement. | Samsung |
21 | O5-O8 | The market knowledge, design trends and technological advancements are learned through functional trainings. | Samsung |
22 | O6-O7 | Successful customer connectivity will enhance channel enhancement | Singapore Airlines |
23 | O7-O6 | Opening outlets and expanding domestic markets will familiarize the products to the customers | Hitachi |
24 | O8-O4 | Functional training will enhance technology integration | Tata Motors |
25 | O8-O7 | Training and knowledge will help | Tata Motors |
26 | O8-O9 | Functional training will enhance opportunity loss | Tata Motors |
27 | O9-O2 | Identifying right alliances will yield positive outcome. | NTPC |
28 | O9-O4 | Novel technology and clear technology will have a significant impact over opportunity loss | NTPC |
29 | O9-O6 | Wide customer base will be affected by opportunity loss | NTPC |
30 | O9-O7 | More business opportunities and market share will be affected by opportunity loss. | NTPC |
31 | O10-O7 | Proper network connectivity, transportations, road connectivity will improve channel enhancement. | L&T |
S. No | Element No. | Paired Comparison of Transitive Links | Case Organizations |
---|---|---|---|
1 | O1-O6 | New and sophisticated products will enhance customer connectivity | Canon |
2 | O3-O1 | The need for flight carriage in emerging economies will provide new synergies for growth | Indigo |
3 | O3-O6 | Price sensitive consumers enhance customer connectivity | Indigo |
4 | O4-O2 | Utilizing technology in network connectivity and safety will enhance business tie-ups | Huawei |
5 | O4-O7 | Technology upgradation will make product and service more feasible to market reach | Huawei |
6 | O5-O1 | Purposeful features, new designs will favour business growth | Samsung |
7 | O8-O1 | Knowledge on technology and technology utilization will enhance customer connectivity | Tata motors |
8 | O8-O6 | Soft skills, technical skills on front office will enhance customer connectivity. | Tata motors |
Number of obs = 60 | ||||||
F (3, 56) = 282.05 | ||||||
Prob > F = 0.0000 | ||||||
R- squared = 0.9379 | ||||||
Adj R—squared = 0.9346 | ||||||
Root MSE = 2391.5 | ||||||
Source | SS | df | MS | |||
Model | 4.8392 × 109 | 3 | 1.6131 × 109 | |||
Residual | 320,270,129 | 56 | 5,719,109.45 | |||
Total | 5.1595 × 109 | 59 | 87,449,072.6 | |||
Operating Activities | Coef. | Std. Err. | t | P > |t| | [95% conf. Interval] | |
Investing Activities | 0.5525548 | 0.0978834 | 5.65 | 0.000 | 0.3564708 | 0.7486387 |
Financing activities | 0.4058251 | 0.2249273 | 1.80 | 0.077 | −0.0447585 | 0.8564086 |
Social value expenditure | 0.3060674 | 0.0496878 | 6.16 | 0.000 | 0.2065308 | 0.4056039 |
_cons | −1273.329 | 463.3307 | −2.75 | 0.008 | −2201.492 | −345.1664 |
Random-effects GLS regression | Number of observations = 60 | |||||
Group Variable: Firm_id | Number of groups = 12 | |||||
R-sq: | Observation per group: | |||||
within = 0.4472 | min = 5 | |||||
between = 0.9535 | avg = 5.0 | |||||
overall = 0.9345 | max = 5 | |||||
Wald chi2 (4) = 248.97 | ||||||
corr (u_i, xb) = 0 (assumed) | prob > chi2 = 0.0000 | |||||
Operating Activities | Coef. | Std. Err. | z | P > |z| | [95% conf. Interval] | |
Investing Activities | 0.3898477 | 0.0888032 | 4.39 | 0.000 | 0.2157965 | 0.5638988 |
Financing activities | 0.5678415 | 0.2003188 | 2.83 | 0.005 | 0.1752239 | 0.960459 |
Social value expenditure | 0.3787422 | 0.0542567 | 6.98 | 0.000 | 0.2724011 | 0.4850833 |
_cons | −1655.192 | 797.5347 | −2.08 | 0.038 | −3218.331 | −92.05232 |
sigma_u | 2005.1502 | |||||
sigma_e | 1536.4836 | |||||
rho | 0.63005321 | (Fraction of variance due to u_i) |
Var | sd = sqrt (Var) | |
---|---|---|
operati~ s | 8.74 × 107 | 9351.421 |
e | 2360782 | 1536.484 |
u | 4020628 | 2005.15 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sushil; Anbarasan, P. Organization’s Sustainable Operational Complexity and Strategic Overview: TISM Approach and Asian Case Studies. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9790. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179790
Sushil, Anbarasan P. Organization’s Sustainable Operational Complexity and Strategic Overview: TISM Approach and Asian Case Studies. Sustainability. 2021; 13(17):9790. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179790
Chicago/Turabian StyleSushil, and Periyasami Anbarasan. 2021. "Organization’s Sustainable Operational Complexity and Strategic Overview: TISM Approach and Asian Case Studies" Sustainability 13, no. 17: 9790. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179790
APA StyleSushil, & Anbarasan, P. (2021). Organization’s Sustainable Operational Complexity and Strategic Overview: TISM Approach and Asian Case Studies. Sustainability, 13(17), 9790. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179790