Development and Sustainability of Rural Economy of Pakistan through Local Community Support for CPEC
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. BRI and CPEC
2.2. Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Development
2.2.1. Economic Impact
2.2.2. Social Impact
2.2.3. Cultural Impact
2.2.4. Environmental Impact
2.2.5. Total Impact
2.2.6. Perceived Media Impact
2.2.7. Proposed Model of the Study
3. Methodology
3.1. Sampling and Data Collection
3.2. Sample Size Calculation
3.3. Measurements
3.4. Data Analysis
4. Results
5. Discussion and Implications
6. Conclusions
7. Limitations, and Future Research Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ahmad, R.; Mi, H.; Fernald, L.W. Revisiting the potential security threats linked with the China—Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). J. Int. Counc. Small Bus. 2020, 1, 64–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, L.; Mi, J.; Shah, M.; Syed, S.J.; Khan, S.; Bibi, K. The Potential Socio-Economic Impact of China Pakistan Economic Corridor. Asian Dev. Policy Rev. 2017, 5, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Haq, R.; Farooq, N. Impact of CPEC on social welfare in Pakistan: A district level analysis. In Proceedings of the 32nd Conference of the Pakistan Society of Development Economists, Islamabad, Pakistan, 13–15 December 2016; pp. 597–618. [Google Scholar]
- Sial, S. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: An assessment of potential threats and constraints. Confl. Peace Stud. 2014, 6, 24. [Google Scholar]
- Tharoor, I. What China’s and Pakistan’s Special Friendship Means. Wash. Post 2015, 21, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, S.K. Framework and Processes for Enhancing Sustainability Deliverables in Australian Road Infrastructure Projects; Queensland University of Technology: Brisbane, Australia, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Iqbal, K. Securing CPEC: Challenges, responses and outcomes. In Securing the Belt and Road Initiative; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 197–214. [Google Scholar]
- Gholizadeh, A.; Madani, S.; Saneinia, S. A geoeconomic and geopolitical review of Gwadar Port on belt and road initiative. Marit. Bus. Rev. 2020, 5, 335–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flint, C.; Zhu, C. The geopolitics of connectivity, cooperation, and hegemonic competition: The Belt and Road Initiative. Geoforum 2019, 99, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Callahan, W.A. China’s “Asia Dream” the belt road initiative and the new regional order. Asian J. Comp. Politics 2016, 1, 226–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clarke, M. The belt and road initiative: China’s new grand strategy? Asia Policy 2017, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fanell, J.E. China’s Global Naval Strategy and Expanding Force Structure. Nav. War Coll. Rev. 2019, 72, 10–55. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J. China’s new foreign policy under Xi Jinping: Towards ‘Peaceful Rise 2.0′? Glob. Chang. Peace Secur. 2015, 27, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shariatinia, M.; Azizi, H. Iran—China cooperation in the silk road economic belt: From strategic understanding to operational understanding. China World Econ. 2017, 25, 46–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qianqian, L.; Yijun, L. The China-Pakistan economic corridor: The Pakistani media attitudes perspective. Technol. Soc. 2020, 62, 101303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, I.; Farooq, S.; Gul, S. China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: News Discourse Analysis of Indian Print Media. J. Political Stud. 2016, 233–252. [Google Scholar]
- Asif, M.; Ling, Y.B. China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): International Media Reporting and Legal Validity of Gilgit-Baltistan. Asian Soc. Sci. 2019, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, I.U.; Hameed, Z.; Khan, S.U. Understanding online banking adoption in a developing country: UTAUT2 with cultural moderators. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. JGIM 2017, 25, 43–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ahmed, Z.S. Impact of the China—Pakistan Economic Corridor on nation-building in Pakistan. J. Contemp. China 2019, 28, 400–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, K.C. The making of one belt, one road and dilemmas in South Asia. China Rep. 2017, 53, 125–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chawla, P.; Iqbal, M. One belt one road summit 2017 and its implications for CPEC: An overview. South Asian Stud. 2020, 32, 277–284. [Google Scholar]
- Kanwal, S.; Pitafi, A.H.; Rasheed, M.I.; Pitafi, A.; Iqbal, J. Assessment of residents’ perceptions and support toward development projects: A study of the China—Pakistan Economic Corridor. Soc. Sci. J. 2020, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iqbal, S.; Chu, J.; Hali, S.M. Projecting impact of CPEC on Pakistan’s electric power crisis. Chin. J. Popul. Resour. Environ. 2019, 17, 310–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irshad, M.S. One belt and one road: Dose China-Pakistan economic corridor benefit for Pakistan’s economy? J. Econ. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 6, 200–207. [Google Scholar]
- Zingel, W.-P.; Guruswamy, M. China’s Pakistan option: Economic and social implications of an ‘all-weather relationship’. IIC Q. 2015, 42, 14–24. [Google Scholar]
- Wolf, S.O. The Merits of Regionalisation and Emerging Prospects in South Asia. Available online: doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02234-5_15 (accessed on 1 January 2021).
- Javaid, U.; Jahangir, A. Pakistan-China strategic relationship: A glorious journey of 55 years. J. Res. Soc. Pak. 2015, 52, 157–183. [Google Scholar]
- Homans, G.C. Social Behaviour as Exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 1958, 63. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1086/222355 (accessed on 1 January 2021).
- Ali, L.; Mi, J.; Shah, M.; Shah, S.J.; Khan, S.; Ullah, R.; Bibi, K. Local residents’ attitude towards road and transport infrastructure (a case of China Pakistan economic corridor). J. Chin. Econ. Foreign Trade Stud. 2018, 11, 104–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Asomani-Boateng, R.; Fricano, R.J.; Adarkwa, F. Assessing the socio-economic impacts of rural road improvements in Ghana: A case study of Transport Sector Program Support (II). Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2015, 3, 355–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, L.; Mi, J.; Shah, M.; Khan, A.; Imran, M. Transport culture akin to the China-Pakistan economic corridor. Hum. Syst. Manag. 2017, 36, 381–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gursoy, D.; Milito, M.C.; Nunkoo, R. Residents’ support for a mega-event: The case of the 2014 FIFA World Cup, Natal, Brazil. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2017, 6, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evenson, R.E.; Gollin, D. Assessing the impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science 2003, 300, 758–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Murgai, R.; Ali, M.; Byerlee, D. Productivity growth and sustainability in post—Green Revolution agriculture: The case of the Indian and Pakistan Punjabs. World Bank Res. Obs. 2001, 16, 199–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, I.; Hanjra, M.A. Irrigation and poverty alleviation: Review of the empirical evidence. Irrig. Drain. 2004, 53, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, I.; Mudasser, M.; Hanjra, M.A.; Amrasinghe, U.; Molden, D. Improving wheat productivity in Pakistan: Econometric analysis using panel data from Chaj in the upper Indus Basin. Water Int. 2004, 29, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, I.; Hanjra, M.A. Does irrigation water matter for rural poverty alleviation? Evidence from South and South-East Asia. Water Policy 2003, 5, 429–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, I.; Giordano, M.; Hanjra, M.A. Agricultural Water and Poverty Linkages: Case Studies on Large and Small Systems. Asian Development Bank 2003. Available online: https://ideas.repec.org/p/iwt/bosers/h032548.html (accessed on 1 January 2021).
- Saleth, R.M.; Samad, M.; Molden, D.; Hussain, I. Water, poverty and gender: An overview of issues and policies. Water Policy 2003, 5, 385–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleth, R.M.; Dinar, A. The Institutional Economics of Water: A Cross-Country Analysis of Institutions and Performance; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Saleth, R.M.; Namara, R.E.; Samad, M. Dynamics of irrigation-poverty linkages in rural India: Analytical framework and empirical analysis. Water Policy 2003, 5, 459–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleth, R.M. Introduction to special section on river basin management: Economics, management, and policy. Water Resour. Res. 2004, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nunkoo, R.; Gursoy, D. Residents’ support for tourism: An identity perspective. Ann. Tour. Res. 2012, 39, 243–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rafiq, M.; Weiwei, W. Managerial trust outlook in China and Pakistan. Hum. Syst. Manag. 2017, 36, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geurs, K.T.; Boon, W.; Van Wee, B. Social impacts of transport: Literature review and the state of the practice of transport appraisal in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Transp. Rev. 2009, 29, 69–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carrier, M.; Apparicio, P.; Séguin, A.-M. Road traffic noise in Montreal and environmental equity: What is the situation for the most vulnerable population groups? J. Transp. Geogr. 2016, 51, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durani, M.Q.; Khan, M.B. The Environmental Impact of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): A Case Study. Abasyn Univ. J. Soc. Sci. 2018, 11, 201–221. [Google Scholar]
- Wolf, S.O. China—Pakistan economic corridor (CPEC): Regional cooperation in the wider south Asian region. In China’s Global Rebalancing and the New Silk Road; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 85–100. [Google Scholar]
- Park, D.-B.; Nunkoo, R.; Yoon, Y.-S. Rural residents’ attitudes to tourism and the moderating effects of social capital. Tour. Geogr. 2015, 17, 112–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stylidis, D.; Biran, A.; Sit, J.; Szivas, E.M. Residents’ support for tourism development: The role of residents’ place image and perceived tourism impacts. Tour. Manag. 2014, 45, 260–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, B.G.; Taylor, M. Empowering engagement: Understanding social media user sense of influence. Int. J. Strateg. Commun. 2017, 11, 148–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.S. An investigation of urban residents’ loyalty to tourism. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2000, 24, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haider, S.I.; Waqar, A. Projection of CPEC in Print Media of Pakistan from 2014–2019. Glob. Strateg. Secur. Stud. Rev. 2020, 1, 47–64. [Google Scholar]
- Nazir, F.; Ali, A.; Farooq, M. Portrayal of CPEC in Leading Pakistani Urdu Newspapers. Global Social Sciences Review. 2020, 2, 157–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weeks, B.E.; Ardèvol-Abreu, A.; de Zúñiga, H. Online influence? Social media use, opinion leadership, and political persuasion. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 2017, 29, 214–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tausch, F.; Zumbuehl, M. Stability of risk attitudes and media coverage of economic news. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2018, 150, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McGehee, N.G.; Andereck, K.L. Factors predicting rural residents’ support of tourism. J. Travel Res. 2004, 43, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peters, M.; Chan, C.-S.; Legerer, A. Local perception of impact-attitudes-actions towards tourism development in the Urlaubsregion Murtal in Austria. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yoon, Y.; Gursoy, D.; Chen, J.S. Validating a tourism development theory with structural equation modeling. Tour. Manag. 2001, 22, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jurowski, C.A. The Interplay of Elements Affecting Host Community Resident Attitudes toward Tourism: A Path Analytic Approach; Virginia Tech: Blacksburg, VA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, L.K. Three questions on China’s “belt and road initiative”. China Econ. Rev. 2016, 40, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M. Pakistan’s quest for coal-based energy under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): Implications for the environment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 31935–31937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zhang, R.; Shi, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, S.; Ahmad, S.; Zhang, X.; Deng, Q. Social impact assessment of investment activities in the China—Pakistan economic corridor. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 2018, 36, 331–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Demographic Characteristics | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 146 | 56.37 |
Female | 113 | 43.63 |
Age | ||
≤25.00 | 26 | 10.04 |
26–35 | 78 | 30.11 |
36–45 | 97 | 37.45 |
≥45 | 58 | 22.39 |
Education | ||
Illiterate | 107 | 41.31 |
Primary | 84 | 32.43 |
Secondary and Higher Secondary | 45 | 17.37 |
Bachelors and Above | 23 | 8.88 |
Domicile | ||
Baluchistan | 74 | 28.57 |
Punjab | 86 | 33.20 |
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | 56 | 21.62 |
Sindh | 43 | 16.60 |
Construct | Items | Loading | Cronbach’s Alfa | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|
Economic Impact | EcoI1 | 0.6872 | 0.8232 | 0.5333 |
EcoI2 | 0.6990 | |||
EcoI3 | 0.7869 | |||
EcoI5 | 0.8107 | |||
EcoI6 | 0.7290 | |||
EcoI7 | 0.6566 | |||
Social Impact | SoI1 | 0.9040 | 0.7898 | 0.6937 |
SoI2 | 0.7664 | |||
SoI3 | 0.8225 | |||
Cultural Impact | CuI1 | 0.6278 | 0.5892 | 0.5512 |
CuI2 | 0.8061 | |||
CuI3 | 0.7808 | |||
Environmental Impact | EnvI1 | 0.6955 | 0.7769 | 0.6881 |
EnvI2 | 0.8661 | |||
EnvI3 | 0.9112 | |||
Total Impact | ToI1 | 0.9346 | 0.8368 | 0.8594 |
ToI2 | 0.9194 | |||
LCS1 | 0.7226 | |||
Perceived Media Impact | MeI1 | 0.7413 | 0.7227 | 0.6372 |
MeI2 | 0.8853 | |||
MeI3 | 0.7605 | |||
Local Community Support | LCS2 | 0.6990 | 0.7478 | 0.5585 |
LCS3 | 0.7757 | |||
LCS4 | 0.7854 |
Indicator | Eco | SoI | CuI | EnI | ToI | MeA | LCS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EcoI1 | 0.6872 | 0.0494 | 0.7445 | 0.3502 | 0.4398 | 0.3859 | 0.3941 |
EcoI2 | 0.6990 | 0.1101 | 0.6938 | 0.2935 | 0.4338 | 0.4359 | 0.3969 |
EcoI3 | 0.7869 | 0.0975 | 0.5299 | 0.4345 | 0.4381 | 0.4724 | 0.4129 |
EcoI5 | 0.8107 | 0.1343 | 0.5214 | 0.4820 | 0.5231 | 0.5208 | 0.3198 |
EcoI6 | 0.7290 | 0.0030 | 0.4754 | 0.4083 | 0.4058 | 0.4509 | 0.2569 |
EcoI7 | 0.6566 | 0.0928 | 0.3275 | 0.4675 | 0.4269 | 0.4102 | 0.2387 |
SoI2 | 0.1308 | 0.9040 | 0.1040 | 0.0507 | 0.1715 | 0.1400 | 0.0556 |
SoI3 | 0.0542 | 0.7664 | 0.0331 | 0.0251 | 0.0822 | 0.0687 | 0.0989 |
SoI4 | 0.0771 | 0.8225 | 0.0574 | 0.0495 | 0.1122 | 0.0236 | 0.0475 |
CuI1 | 0.3749 | 0.0403 | 0.6278 | 0.2731 | 0.3028 | 0.2924 | 0.3740 |
CuI2 | 0.6239 | 0.0722 | 0.8061 | 0.2521 | 0.4052 | 0.3579 | 0.3524 |
CuI3 | 0.6427 | 0.0768 | 0.7808 | 0.2187 | 0.3960 | 0.3970 | 0.3372 |
EnI1 | 0.3979 | 0.0980 | 0.2546 | 0.6955 | 0.4004 | 0.3364 | 0.2982 |
EnI2 | 0.4564 | −0.0168 | 0.2536 | 0.8661 | 0.6428 | 0.4472 | 0.2615 |
EnI3 | 0.5260 | 0.0673 | 0.3114 | 0.9112 | 0.7984 | 0.5138 | 0.2880 |
ToI1 | 0.5850 | 0.1545 | 0.4727 | 0.7788 | 0.9346 | 0.5989 | 0.3496 |
ToI2 | 0.5488 | 0.1361 | 0.4532 | 0.6522 | 0.9194 | 0.6403 | 0.3568 |
MeA1 | 0.5412 | 0.1209 | 0.4596 | 0.3987 | 0.5001 | 0.7413 | 0.2644 |
MeA2 | 0.5329 | 0.0500 | 0.4080 | 0.4874 | 0.6152 | 0.8853 | 0.3878 |
MeA3 | 0.3749 | 0.1024 | 0.2413 | 0.3705 | 0.4537 | 0.7605 | 0.2074 |
LCS1 | 0.3014 | 0.0409 | 0.2938 | 0.1905 | 0.2128 | 0.2096 | 0.7237 |
LCS2 | 0.3025 | 0.0664 | 0.2867 | 0.1675 | 0.1849 | 0.2118 | 0.7089 |
LCS3 | 0.3035 | 0.0433 | 0.3878 | 0.2726 | 0.2998 | 0.2776 | 0.7689 |
LCS4 | 0.4333 | 0.0687 | 0.4031 | 0.3095 | 0.3739 | 0.3725 | 0.7852 |
Construct | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Economic Impact | 0.740 | ||||||
Social Impact | 0.194 ** | 0.832 | |||||
Cultural Impact | 0.731 ** | 0.121 | 0.742 | ||||
Environmental Impact | 0.534 ** | 0.192 ** | 0.335 ** | 0.829 | |||
Total Impact | 0.607 ** | 0.278 ** | 0.492 ** | 0.734 ** | 0.927 | ||
Media Impact | 0.585 ** | 0.329 ** | 0.456 ** | 0.511 ** | 0.657 ** | 0.798 | |
Local Community Support | 0.448 ** | 0.125 * | 0.480 ** | 0.313 ** | 0.366 ** | 0.334 ** | 0.746 |
Model | B | Std. Error | T | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|
(Constant) | −0.878 | 0.254 | −3.452 | 0.001 |
Economic Impact | 0.201 | 0.084 | 2.380 | 0.018 |
Social Impact | 0.155 | 0.052 | 3.003 | 0.003 |
Cultural Impact | 0.228 | 0.072 | 3.146 | 0.002 |
Environmental Impact | 0.703 | 0.056 | 12.543 | 0.000 |
R-Square | 0.63 | |||
F-Value (p-Value) | 108.15 (0.000) |
Model | B | Std. Error | T | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|
(Constant) | 3.376 | 0.045 | 75.086 | 0.000 |
Total Impact | 0.136 | 0.054 | 2.501 | 0.013 |
Media Perceived Support | 0.100 | 0.052 | 1.909 | 0.057 |
Total Support × Media Perceived Support | 0.087 | 0.034 | 2.572 | 0.011 |
R-Square | 0.171 | |||
F-Value (p-Value) | 17.48 (0.000) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Khalil, I.U.; Hena, S.; Ghani, U.; Ullah, R.; Jan, I.; Rauf, A.; Rehman, A.; Abbas, A.; Jingdong, L. Development and Sustainability of Rural Economy of Pakistan through Local Community Support for CPEC. Sustainability 2021, 13, 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020686
Khalil IU, Hena S, Ghani U, Ullah R, Jan I, Rauf A, Rehman A, Abbas A, Jingdong L. Development and Sustainability of Rural Economy of Pakistan through Local Community Support for CPEC. Sustainability. 2021; 13(2):686. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020686
Chicago/Turabian StyleKhalil, Inam Ullah, Sehresh Hena, Usman Ghani, Raza Ullah, Inayatullah Jan, Abdul Rauf, Abdul Rehman, Azhar Abbas, and Luan Jingdong. 2021. "Development and Sustainability of Rural Economy of Pakistan through Local Community Support for CPEC" Sustainability 13, no. 2: 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020686
APA StyleKhalil, I. U., Hena, S., Ghani, U., Ullah, R., Jan, I., Rauf, A., Rehman, A., Abbas, A., & Jingdong, L. (2021). Development and Sustainability of Rural Economy of Pakistan through Local Community Support for CPEC. Sustainability, 13(2), 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020686