Next Article in Journal
Decentralized Control of DC Microgrid Based on Droop and Voltage Controls with Electricity Price Consideration
Next Article in Special Issue
Production of Eco-Sustainable Materials: Compatibilizing Action in Poly (Lactic Acid)/High-Density Biopolyethylene Bioblends
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Regional Economic Resilience after the 2008 Global Economic Crisis: The Case of Korea
Previous Article in Special Issue
Durability of Sustainable Ceramics Produced by Alkaline Activation of Clay Brick Residue
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of Eco-Friendly Mortars Produced with Kaolin Processing Waste: Durability Behavior Viewpoint

by
Alisson Mendes Rodrigues
1,*,
Fabiana Pereira da Costa
2,
Suellen Lisboa Dias Beltrão
2,
Jucielle Veras Fernandes
2,
Romualdo Rodrigues Menezes
1 and
Gelmires de Araújo Neves
1
1
Laboratory of Materials Technology (LTM), Department of Materials Engineering, Federal University of Campina Grande, Bodocongó, Campina Grande 58429-900, Brazil
2
Graduate Program in Materials Science and Engineering (PPG-CEMat), Department of Materials Engineering, Federal University of Campina Grande, Bodocongó, Campina Grande 58429-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(20), 11395; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011395
Submission received: 9 August 2021 / Revised: 15 September 2021 / Accepted: 9 October 2021 / Published: 15 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Environmentally-Friendly and Sustainable Materials)

Abstract

:
This study presents the development of new eco-friendly mortar compositions containing kaolin residues (KR) and assesses their durability behavior. Firstly, the natural and calcinated kaolin residues (600 °C, 650 °C, 700 °C, 750 °C, and 800 °C) were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), differential thermal analysis (DTA), granulometric analysis, and surface area. The kaolin residue calcinated at 800 °C was chosen to be added to new compositions of mortar because it presented the best pozzolanic performance. The aging tests accomplished in internal (Ei) and external (Ee) environments were applied in mortars with a mass proportion of 1:2:6 (cement + KR: lime: sand), in which the KR, calcinated at 800 °C, replaced the cement in the mass fraction of 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30%. The Ei was performed for 30, 60, 90, 180, and 360 days, and the Ee for 90; 210; 360; and 512 days. After the aging tests were completed, the mortar compositions containing KR were evaluated to determine their mineralogical phases (XRD), compressive strength (CS), and thermal behavior (DTA and thermogravimetry). In summary, the KR addition to the mortar compositions decreases the mechanical resistance to compression; however, mortars with a substitution of 10% and 20% presented resistance values within the minimum limit of 2.4 MPa established by ASTM C 270.

1. Introduction

Sustainable construction materials are being increasingly studied to minimize the environmental impacts generated by the civil construction sector. Many studies have targeted alternative materials to replace the use of cement in concretes and mortars to improve their sustainability. This is because the Portland cement production process releases one of the highest CO2 emission rates in the world. It is estimated that about one ton of carbon dioxide is created for each ton of Portland cement produced [1,2,3].
Several studies have been carried out using alternative cementitious materials to replace Portland cement in concretes and mortars to mitigate their environmental impacts and reduce costs. Among the alternative materials are fly ash [4,5,6], blast furnace slag [7,8,9], eggshell powder [2,10], silica fume [11,12,13], limestone [14,15], calcium carbide residue [16], and calcined kaolin residue, which is undoubtedly one of the most well known alternative cementitious materials [17]. The kaolinite clay is the main constituent in the kaolin residues. When such residues are submitted to thermal treatment, under controlled conditions, kaolinite dehydroxylation is guaranteed, whereby it transforms itself into an amorphous structure called metakaolinite. Metakaolin can be used in civil construction and added to mortars to act as a material pozzolanic. The main property of a pozzolana is its ability to react and combine with calcium hydroxide, forming stable compounds with an agglomerating power, such as hydrated calcium silicates and aluminates [17,18,19].
The positive effects exerted by pozzolans on the mechanical properties and durability of mortars and concretes have been emphasized in several studies. Al-Akhras [20] investigated the sulfate resistance of concretes produced from the mixture of metakaolinite (MK) with Portland cement (PC), at the substitution levels of 5, 10, and 15 wt%, and concluded that such a substitution was beneficial for the resistance to the sulfate, which increases with the increase in MK content in the mixture. Guneyisi et al. [21] used MK to substitute Portland cement at levels of 10 and 20 wt% to improve the performance of the concrete. The authors evaluated the durability properties of samples produced from water absorption (WA), drying shrinkage (DS), and porosity (P) measures, and reported that the incorporation of MK reduced the drying shrinkage deformation and improved the pore structures of the samples. In addition, they observed a decreasing trend in WA with an increase in the MK content.
It is worth mentioning that durability evaluation is undoubtedly the most critical aspect of cementitious material development because, for it to be reliable, knowledge of its conditions of use and its useful life is essential [22,23,24]. Although the calcined kaolin residue has been extensively studied as a pozzolanic material, studies that addressed the long-term durability behavior of mortars containing kaolin residue are still scarce. Therefore, this work aims to use calcined kaolin residue as a partial substitute for cement in different percentages (0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30%) in the composition of mortar for coating, and to assess the overall impact on the long-term durability behavior. Mortar durability will be evaluated by natural aging tests in the internal (30, 60, 90, 180, and 360 days) and external (90, 210, 360, and 512 days) environments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials

The Portland cement type CPII-F 32 (PC) was used as a binder following the ASTM C150 standard (CIMPOR BRASIL) [25]. This cement was used because it does not have the addition of pozzolan. The other materials used were hydrated lime (HL) (Carbomil); sand (S), with a density of 2.6 g/cm3 and an average particle diameter of 4.8 mm; and kaolin residue (KR) supplied by Caulim Caiçara S/A (Brazil). The as-received kaolin residue was pulverized in a MultiNo® (270 M/S/M) compressed air mill for 30 min, and heat-treated for 2 h at different temperatures (600 °C, 650 °C, 700 °C, 750 °C, and 800 °C). The heat treatments were carried out in an electric oven (Flyever Equipment, FE 50 RP) at a heating rate of 5 °C/min−1.

2.2. Preparation and Curing of the Mortar Samples

Samples with a mass proportion of 1:2:6 (cement + KR: lime: sand) were prepared with and without the kaolin residue. In the samples with kaolin residue, the cement was replaced. The mass fractions of Portland cement substitutions by calcined kaolin residue were 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30%.
The raw materials were mixed in a mechanical planetary motion mixer for 5 min. After that, water was added to the mixture until the consistency index was 260 ± 10mm (ASTM C 1437) [26]. The test specimens were molded in a cylindrical mold with the dimensions of 50 mm × 100 mm (diameter × height). After 24 h, the samples were demolded and immersed in water with lime (2% concentration) for 30 days. This procedure was carried out to avoid carbonation. Table 1 provides details of the proportions used for the mortars and the nominal composition of replaced cement.

2.3. Mortar Durability Assessment

Aging tests in internal (Ei) (laboratory) and external (Ee) environments were carried out to evaluate the durability of the two mortar compositions studied. All experiments were carried out in triplicate. The aging test specimens in an internal environment were kept in a place protected from external climatic actions (a laboratory environment with temperatures between 21 °C and 30 °C, and an air humidity of ~78%) for 30, 60, 90, 180, and 360 days. The test specimens submitted to the aging test in an external environment were kept in a place that permitted their exposure to the environment’s natural climatic conditions. The samples from this test were kept in this environment for 90, 210, 360, and 512 days.

2.4. Characterizations

The chemical composition was defined using X-ray fluorescence (Shimadzu, EDX 720). The mineralogical phase characterization was performed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Shimadzu XRD6000 equipment with Cu Kα radiation (40kV/30mA), and a goniometer speed of 2 °C/min−1, step of 0.02°, and the JCPDS database. Thermogravimetric (TGA) and differential thermal (DTA) analyses were performed using a BP Engenharia equipment (model RB-300) with a nitrogen atmosphere and heating rate equal to 12.5 °C/min−1. All thermal analyses were performed in platinum crucibles and the temperature range was kept between 25–1000 °C. Before the mineralogical (XRD) and thermal (TGA and DTA) tests, the mortar samples were packed in polyethylene bags to prevent carbonation and the tests were carried out on the same day.
The particle size distribution of kaolin residue was determined by laser diffraction (Cilas, 1064 LD), and the specific area was evaluated using the BET methodology (ASAP 2420 V2.02). The pozzolanic activity (IPA) was measured from test specimens (50 mm x 100 mm) manufactured from two mortar compositions. The first composition, called reference mortar (mortar ref.), only contained Portland cement. In the second composition (mortar KR), 20% of the cement was replaced by calcined kaolin residue. In both compositions, the H2O/PC or H2O/(PC + KR) ratio was equal to 0.485, as specified in ASTM C311M [27]. Compressive strength (CS) measurements were performed using test specimens cured for 7, 14, and 28 days, and the IPA value was calculated with the aid of Equation (1):
I P A % = C S M K R C S M R e f × 100
where CSMRef (MPa) and CSMKR (MPa) correspond to the CS values measured using the mortar ref. and mortar KR samples, respectively.
After each exposure period (durability tests), compressive strength tests were carried out in accordance with ASTM C39/C39M [28]. All experiments were performed on a universal mechanical testing machine (SHIMADZU, AG-IS) with a loading speed of 0.25 ± 0.05 MPa/s. Mineralogical (XRD) and thermal (TGA and DTA) tests were also carried out to monitor the phase transformations.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Raw Materials Characterizations

The chemical compositions of Portland cement type CPII-F 32, hydrated lime, and kaolin residue are listed in Table 2. Figure 1a,b show XRD patterns of Portland cement type CPII-F 32 and of hydrated lime. The mineralogical phases: tricalcium silicate (C3S—3CaO·SiO2, JCPDS 49-0442); dicalcium silicate (C2S—2CaO·SiO2, JCPDS 33-0302); tricalcium aluminate (C3A—3CaO·Al2O3, JCPDS 38-1429); iron tetracalcium aluminate (C4AF—4CaO·Al2O3·Fe2O3, JCPDS 30-0226); calcium carbonate (CaCO3, JCPDS 05-0586); and calcium sulfate hemihydrate (CaSO4·1/2H2O, JCPDS 0041-0244), were detected in the Portland cement (Figure 1a). In the hydrated lime (Figure 1b) the phases of portlandite (Ca(OH)2, JCPDS 72-0156) and calcite (CaCO3, JCPDS 05-0586) were detected.
Figure 2a–f show the XRD patterns of natural and calcined kaolin residues at different temperatures (600 °C, 650 °C, 700 °C, 750 °C, and 800 °C). The mineralogical phases: quartz (SiO2, JCPDS 46-1045); mica (KMg3(Si3Al)O10(OH)2, JCPDS 83-1808); and kaolinite (Al2Si2O5(OH)4, JCPDS 14-0164) were detected in the natural kaolin residue. Except for kaolinite, all other mineralogical phases were also identified in the calcined kaolin residues. At temperatures above 500 °C, the kaolinite suffers dehydroxylation with the consequent breakdown of the structure, which then forms the metakaolinite (Al2Si2O5(OH)4 → Al2O3·2SiO2 + 2H2O). However, the characteristic amorphous band of metakaolin is not evident in Figure 2b–f, due to the relatively high intensity of the quartz peak (2θ = 26.64°).
The DTA curves measured from natural and calcined kaolin residues are shown in Figure 3. The natural kaolin residue has an endothermic peak at around 600 °C, which is characteristic of kaolinite dehydroxylation, giving rise to amorphous metakaolinite [29]. Such a kaolinite dehydroxylation peak (at 600 °C) was not observed in the DTA curves measured from the calcined kaolinite residues. An exothermic peak at 900 °C is related to mullite nucleation [30,31], which was identified in all DTA curves.
The granulometric and surface area analysis of Portland cement particles, hydrated lime, and natural and calcined kaolin residues are listed in Table 3. In general, the natural and calcined kaolin residues presented an average particle diameter between 12.1 µm and 19.0 µm. The specific surface area is a relevant factor in the pozzolanic reaction since it depends strongly on the structure of the surface and its specific area [32,33]. It is worth remembering that the larger the specific area, the greater the reactivity of the material. Furthermore, the material’s specific area tends to be larger if the particle size is smaller [34,35]. A greater fineness of the kaolin residue leads to an improvement in its pozzolanicity. Therefore, the calcined kaolin residue at the temperature of 800 °C was used to prepare the mortar compositions investigated in this study because it had the smallest average particle diameter (12.8 µm) and the largest specific area (25.95 m2/g). Huang et al. [29] evaluated the influence of the calcination temperature (500–1000 °C) on the pozzolanic activity in the kaolin residues from southwest China. They found that the best calcination temperature for converting the kaolin residue into metakaolin with a high pozzolanic index was 800 °C.
Figure 4 shows the compressive strength (CS) and the pozzolanic activity index (IPA) measured from mortars without and with kaolin residue calcined at 800 °C (mortar ref. and mortar KR 800 °C, respectively). As previously mentioned, in the sample used to assess the IPA value, 20% of the cement was replaced by calcined kaolin residue. All samples were cured for 7, 14, and 28 days. For samples cured for 7 days, it was observed that the addition of kaolin residue resulted in a decrease in compressive strength of 8.2% (IPA = 91.8%). Such behavior occurred because replacing part of the cement with pozzolan decreases its resistance, due to less cementing fraction. In addition, pozzolanic reactions are slow, so it is only with time that resistance increases. Such behavior is related to the formation of calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) resulting from the reaction between calcined kaolin residue and portlandite, i.e., a pozzolanic reaction. As expected, the CSH formation increases the mechanical strength. For cure times equal to 14 and 28 days, the mortar KR 800 °C sample showed slight CS values than the samples measured for the mortar ref. (IPA > 100%). From the perspective of mechanical strength, this result indicates that the kaolin residue, calcined at 800 °C, has the potential to replace cement in mortar. All IPA values were higher than the minimum limit of 75% recommended by ASTM C618 [36].

3.2. Mortar Properties after Aging in Internal and External Environments

Figure 5a–e shows XRD patterns of mortar KR 800 °C aged under internal environments (Ei) for 30, 180, and 360 days (Figure 5a–c) and external environments (Ee) for 360 and 512 days (Figure 5d–e). The portlandite (Ca(OH)2, JCPDS 72-0156); ettringite (3CaO·Al2O3·3CaSO4·32H2O, JCPDS 72-0646); calcite (CaCO3, JCPDS 05-0586); and quartz (SiO2, JCPDS 46-1045) were phases identified in the mortars exposed to the internal and external environment. However, the intensity of the portlandite phase peaks decreased with time. Such behavior is strongly related to the pozzolanic reactions and the carbonation process. This indicates that the pozzolanic reaction and the carbonation process, over time, have consumed the portlandite.
Figure 6a–d show the TGA and DTA curves of mortars aged in an internal environment for 30 days (Figure 6a,b) and 360 days (Figure 6c,d). In general, it is possible to see that all the curves have a similar thermic profile. In summary, all mortars show four stages of mass loss. The first stage is identified in the temperature range between 25–100 °C and is associated with the evaporation of free water, adsorbed water loss, and water coordinated to cations. The second stage occurs in the temperature range between 101–400 °C and corresponds to the dehydration of ettringite, hydrated calcium silicate (CSH), and the decomposition of hemi compounds and monocarbonates (AFm). The dehydration regions of CSH and ettringite are superimposed; however, it is possible to observe peaks at around 156 °C which correspond to the loss of water in the ettringite phase [37,38,39]. The decomposition of hemi and monocarbonate components is more evident at 360 days (Figure 6d), a process in which it is possible to observe the formation of an endothermic band at around 215 °C. The last 2 stages occur in the temperature range between 401–500 °C and 501–1000 °C, and are related to the decomposition of calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2 → CaO + H2O) and calcium carbonate (CaCO3 → CaO + CO2), respectively [40,41,42]. The mass loss in these regions can be used to determine the Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 content. It is worth mentioning that calcite (CaCO3), a carbonation product, tends to reduce the mortars’ strength.
An increase in loss was observed for all samples studied after 360 days of aging in the internal environment (Figure 6c,d). This result may be related to the exposure of the mortars to the ambient air, causing carbonation from the reaction with CO2. In fact, the intensity of the endothermic peaks related to calcite decomposition (CaCO3) increases with time (see Figure 6b,d). Moreover, the intensity of the endothermic peaks, from the dehydroxylation of portlandite (Ca(OH)2) decreased significantly with time. This indicates that portlandite was consumed by the carbonation reaction.
For M0 (mortar without KR) the mass loss in the fourth region (i.e, the zone related to calcite decomposition) was approximately 18.6% and 32.7%, at 30 days and 360 days, respectively. However, for the samples with KR (M5, M10, M15, M20, and M30) the losses in this region were smaller, in the range of 9.9–11.6% and 30.4–31.6%, at 30 and 360 days. This indicates that the formation of CSH was probably favored in the samples with calcined KR and, as a consequence, the carbonation effect was relatively moderate.
Figure 7a,b show the DTA curves of mortars aged naturally in an external environment for 90 days (Figure 7a) and 512 days (Figure 7b). For all compositions, endothermic peaks were observed at around 156 °C and 215 °C, which are related to ettringite and AFm (hemicarbonate and monocarbonate) phases, respectively [39,43]. It is known that calcined KR, in addition to silicon, has a high content of alumina in its composition (see Table 1). Thus, the presence of hemi and monocarbonate compounds are probably associated with the chemical reaction of calcite (CaCO3) from lime, and the extra alumina present in the system is likely due to the addition of kaolin residue. It is important to emphasize that the formation of hemi and monocarbonate compounds inhibits the formation of monosulfate, so the ettringite remains in the system for a longer period of time [44]. The ettringite, hemi, and monocarbonate phases occupy a greater volume of solid hydrates in the mortar pores compared to monosulfates, thus encouraging the filling up of voids and the attainment of mechanical strength [45].
Intense peaks at ~461–480 °C and ~750 °C were also observed, which are associated with portlandite and calcium carbonate. This indicates that all mortars present an excess of free lime. The increase in the curing time from 90 to 512 days caused the displacement and intensification of the peak relative to calcium carbonate. With the displacement, the CaCO3 peak occurred from ~752 °C to ~788 °C. Such behavior is related to the consumption of portlandite by the pozzolanic reaction and carbonation.
In carbonation, CO2 comes into contact with water and the carbonate elements (Ca(OH)2, C-S-H, C2S, and C3S) in the mortar pores. This process depends on relative humidity, temperature, and CO2 concentration. Furthermore, the inefficient compaction and high water–cement ratio generate high permeability in the material [46]. For mortars cured at 512 days (Figure 7b), it is possible to observe the appearance of exothermic bands between the temperatures of 215–450 °C. These bands refer to the crystallization of CSH.
Figure 8a–f show the CS values and percentages of increase/decrease in the samples submitted to natural aging in the internal (Figure 8a,c,e) and external environments (Figure 8b,d,f). In Figure 8a, it is possible to observe an increase in the compressive strength of samples cured up to 180 days. Such behavior is related to the cement hydration process and the pozzolanic reactions.
The main products formed during the cement hydration process are hydrated calcium silicate (primarily CSH) and portlandite Ca(OH)2. CSH is a non-crystalline product, called agglomerating gel, that provides resistance to mortar and concrete and contributes significantly to the durability of cementitious materials. Moreover, due to the pore refinement process, there is a decrease in the permeability of the system and, therefore, a hinderance to the contact of reactive substances with the cement. On the other hand, portlandite consists of low resistance crystals that are soluble in water and which do not contribute to the material’s resistance and durability [6,47,48].
In the pozzolanic reaction, the calcined kaolin residue (metakaolin) reacts with calcium hydroxide (portlandite) to form additional hydrated calcium silicate (secondary CSH), see Equation (2). Figure 9 shows the schematic representation of the microstructure of the material without pozzolan and with the incorporation of pozzolan. The CSH particles are smaller when compared to Ca(OH)2, and have the ability to occupy capillary voids. These particles also have a greater specific area, providing the cement paste with greater mechanical resistance [49].
3 Ca OH 2 + SiO 2 3 CaO · SiO 2 · 3 H 2 O
Regardless of the aging test type (internal and external environments), M10, M15, and M30 samples showed lower compressive strength values than the reference sample (M0). Moreover, at the end of the aging period in the internal environment (30 to 360 days), there was no resistance gain for M10, M15, and M30 samples. It is noteworthy that the M15 sample showed a 33% reduction in resistance to the initial cure time (30 days), see Figure 8e. These same mortars showed similar behavioral patterns when subjected to aging in an external environment (Figure 8d,f), which indicates that, although it has presented considerable initial gains, the replacement of cement with calcined kaolin residue, in the proportions of 10%, 15%, and 30%, did not lead to an improvement in its durability over time.
In general, there is a considerable decrease in the mechanical strength for all mortars with the evolution of the curing time ranging from 180 to 360 days (internal environment aging: Figure 8a) and from 360 to 512 days (external environment aging: Figure 8b). Such behavior can be associated with the carbonation process. Carbonation occurs due to carbon dioxide gas (CO2), present in the air, penetrating the mortars through the pores in the material. In the presence of water, CO2 dissolves and forms CO32− ions which react with Ca2+ ions to form calcite, as shown in Equation (3). Ca2+ ions originate mainly from portlandite.
Ca OH 2 + CO 2 H 2 O   CaCO 3 + H 2 O
In addition to the portlandite, other hydrated compounds (calcium aluminates and silicates) are also sensitive to CO2 attack. The reaction between CO2 and Ca(OH)2 is more favorable from a kinetics viewpoint. For example, the reaction between CO2 and Ca(OH)2 is three times faster than the reaction between CO2 and CSH, which is twenty times faster than the reaction between CO2 and C2S, and fifty times faster than the reaction between CO2 and C3S [17,50]. Figure 10 schematically shows the carbonation process that occurs when CO2 enters the mortar surface through the pores in the material.
The composition with 20% of residue (M20) presented the lowest percentage of resistance loss among all the compositions, and was the only case that, at the end of the whole process, presented resistance gain in both forms of aging (internal and external environments), see Figure 8e,f. At the end of the 360 days, in the internal environment aging test, the compressive strength of this composition surpassed the MPa of the other compositions (3.3 ± 0.25). This shows that, even with carbonation, the M20 sample degraded less. This behavior is probably associated with the greater packaging of particles, making CO2 access more difficult and reducing the carbonation effect. Figure 11 shows the water absorption results (WA) of the mortars after the aging test in the internal environment. It is possible to observe that, at the end of the 360 days, M20 presented the lowest value of WA (12.6 ± 0.3) % compared with the other compositions. In this way, it is reasonable to infer that the M20 sample presented minor porosity, at least between 90 and 360 days of acting under the internal environment. Such a conclusion strengthens the idea of CO2 access reducing the carbonation effect.
Therefore, the porosity present in the mortars and concretes is one factor that can affect durability and stability since it facilitates the aggressive agent diffusibility to the material, such as carbon dioxide, acidic solutions, and sulfides. Thus, it is essential to highlight the importance of studying the degradation behavior of mortars containing residues, since the result of their resistance, which is generally measured after curing in 28 days, does not always indicate the real behavior of this material over time. Furthermore, it is essential to consider the content of substitution for the use of residues in mortars. The M0, M10, and M20 samples presented resistance values within the minimum limit (2.4 MPa) established by ASTM C 270 [51] in both types of aging tests (internal and external environments).

4. Conclusions

Based on our results, it can be concluded that the partial replacement of Portland cement with kaolin residue in coating mortars is feasible. The addition of calcined kaolin residue in the mortars reduced the mechanical resistance to compression in practically all substitution levels. However, mortars with a 10% and 20% substitution presented resistance values within the minimum limit of 2.4 MPa established by ASTM C 270. The content of replacing cement with a kaolin residue influenced the durability behavior of the mortars. Incorporating the residue in the substitution proportions of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 30% did not improve their mechanical resistance or durability. The composition with 20% of kaolin residues presented, again, compressive strength at the end of the entire aging process to the initial evaluation stages. And at the end of 360 days of aging in an internal environment, the compressive strength of this composition surpassed the MPa of the other compositions (3.3 ± 0.25).

Author Contributions

Methodology, software, data curation, and formal analysis, F.P.d.C., S.L.D.B. and J.V.F.; conceptualization, supervision, funding acquisition, and project administration, G.d.A.N. and R.R.M.; formal analysis and writing—review and editing, A.M.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), grant number 88887.597478/2021-00, and by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), grant number 140211/2021-7.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Laboratório de Tecnologia do Materiais (LTM-UAEMa/UFCG) for the infrastructure to carry out tests.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Amaral, L.F.; Girondi Delaqua, G.C.; Nicolite, M.; Marvila, M.T.; de Azevedo, A.R.G.; Alexandre, J.; Fontes Vieira, C.M.; Monteiro, S.N. Eco-friendly mortars with addition of ornamental stone waste—A mathematical model approach for granulometric optimization. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 248, 119283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cree, D.; Pliya, P. Effect of elevated temperature on eggshell, eggshell powder and eggshell powder mortars for masonry applications. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 26, 100852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. McLellan, B.C.; Williams, R.P.; Lay, J.; Van Riessen, A.; Corder, G.D. Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 1080–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Chen, Z.; Poon, C.S. Comparative studies on the effects of sewage sludge ash and fly ash on cement hydration and properties of cement mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 154, 791–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bilir, T.; Gencel, O.; Topcu, I. Properties of mortars with fly ash as fine aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 93, 782–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hsu, S.; Chi, M.; Huang, R. Effect of fineness and replacement ratio of ground fly ash on properties of blended cement mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 176, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Onn, C.C.; Mo, K.H.; Radwan, M.K.; Liew, W.H.; Ng, C.G.; Yusoff, S. Strength, carbon footprint and cost considerations of mortar blends with high volume ground granulated blast furnace slag. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Seifi, S.; Sebaibi, N.; Levacher, D.; Boutouil, M. Mechanical performance of a dry mortar without cement, based on paper fly ash and blast furnace slag. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 22, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rakhimova, N.; Rakhimov, R.Z. Alkali-activated cements and mortars based on blast furnace slag and red clay brick waste. Mater. Des. 2015, 85, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pliya, P.; Cree, D. Limestone derived eggshell powder as a replacement in Portland cement mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 95, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ahmad, M.; Chen, B. Effect of silica fume and basalt fiber on the mechanical properties and microstructure of magnesium phosphate cement (MPC) mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 190, 466–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Benli, A. Mechanical and durability properties of self-compacting mortars containing binary and ternary mixes of fly ash and silica fume. Struct. Concr. 2019, 20, 1096–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gupta, S.; Kua, H.W. Combination of Biochar and Silica Fume as Partial Cement Replacement in Mortar: Performance Evaluation Under Normal and Elevated Temperature. Waste Biomass Valorization 2020, 11, 2807–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chouhan, H.S.; Kalla, P.; Nagar, R.; Gautam, P.K. Gainful utilization of dimensional limestone waste as fine aggregate in cement mortar mixes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 221, 363–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pozo-Antonio, J. Evolution of mechanical properties and drying shrinkage in lime-based and lime cement-based mortars with pure limestone aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 77, 472–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hanjitsuwan, S.; Phoo-ngernkham, T.; Li, L.Y.; Damrongwiriyanupap, N.; Chindaprasirt, P. Strength development and durability of alkali-activated fly ash mortar with calcium carbide residue as additive. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 162, 714–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Sabir, B.; Wild, S.; Bai, J. Metakaolin and calcined clays as pozzolans for concrete: A review. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2001, 23, 441–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koutník, P.; Soukup, A.; Bezucha, P.; Šafář, J.; Kohout, J. Low viscosity metakaolinite based geopolymer binders. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 230, 116978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Silva, A.S.; Gameiro, A.; Grilo, J.; Veiga, R.; Velosa, A. Long-term behavior of lime-metakaolin pastes at ambient temperature and humid curing condition. Appl. Clay Sci. 2014, 88–89, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Al-Akhras, N.M. Durability of metakaolin concrete to sulfate attack. Cem. Concr. Res. 2006, 36, 1727–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Güneyisi, E.; Gesoğlu, M.; Mermerdaş, K. Improving strength, drying shrinkage, and pore structure of concrete using metakaolin. Mater. Struct. 2008, 41, 937–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bassuoni, M.T.; Nehdi, M.L. Resistance of self-consolidating concrete to sulfuric acid attack with consecutive pH reduction. Cem. Concr. Res. 2007, 37, 1070–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Goyal, S.; Kumar, M.; Sidhu, D.S.; Bhattacharjee, B. Resistance of Mineral Admixture Concrete to Acid Attack. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 2009, 7, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Senhadji, Y.; Escadeillas, G.; Khelafi, H.; Mouli, M.; Benosman, A.S. Evaluation of natural pozzolan for use as supplementary cementitious material. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 2012, 16, 77–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. ASTM International. ASTM C150/C150M-20, Standard Specification for Portland Cement; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  26. ASTM International. ASTM C1437, Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  27. ASTM International. ASTM C311-18-Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Fly Ash or Natural Pozzolans for Use in Portland-Cement Concrete; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  28. ASTM International. ASTM C39/C39M-20-Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  29. Huang, Y.; Deng, J.; Wang, W.; Feng, Q.; Xu, Z. Preliminary investigation of pozzolanic properties of calcined waste kaolin. Medziagotyra 2018, 24, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Almeida, E.P.; Carreiro, M.E.A.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Ferreira, H.S.; Santana, L.N.L.; Menezes, R.R.; Neves, G.A. A new eco-friendly mass formulation based on industrial mining residues for the manufacture of ceramic tiles. Ceram. Int. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Da Silva, V.J.; da Silva, M.F.; Gonçalves, W.P.; de Menezes, R.R.; de Araújo Neves, G.; de Lucena Lira, H.; de Lima Santana, L.N. Porous mullite blocks with compositions containing kaolin and alumina waste. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 15471–15478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bui, D.D.; Hu, J.; Stroeven, P. Particle size effect on the strength of rice husk ash blended gap-graded Portland cement concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2005, 27, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kiattikomol, K.; Jaturapitakkul, C.; Songpiriyakij, S.; Chutubtim, S. A study of ground coarse fly ashes with different finenesses from various sources as pozzolanic materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2001, 23, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Da Costa, F.P.; da Silva Morais, C.R.; Rodrigues, A.M. Sustainable glass-ceramic foams manufactured from waste glass bottles and bentonite. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 17957–17961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Da Costa, F.P.; da Silva Morais, C.R.; Pinto, H.C.; Rodrigues, A.M. Microstructure and physico-mechanical properties of Al2O3-doped sustainable glass-ceramic foams. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 256, 123612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. ASTM International. ASTM C618-19-Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete 1; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sun, C.; Sun, M.; Tao, T.; Qu, F.; Wang, G.; Zhang, P.; Li, Y.; Duan, J. Chloride binding capacity and its effect on the microstructure of mortar made with marine sand. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Michel, M.; Georgin, J.F.; Ambroise, J. Improving the mechanical performance of high-grade slag cement by the addition of Portland cement and sulfoaluminate cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 37, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. De Weerdt, K.; Kjellsen, K.O.; Sellevold, E.; Justnes, H. Synergy between fly ash and limestone powder in ternary cements. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2011, 33, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Song, H.; Jeong, Y.; Bae, S.; Jun, Y.; Yoon, S.; Oh, J.E. A study of thermal decomposition of phases in cementitious systems using HT-XRD and TG. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 169, 648–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, C.; Yang, L.; Wang, F.; Hu, S. Enhace the durability of heat-cured mortars by internal curing and pozzolanic activity of lightweight fine aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 270, 121439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rupasinghe, M.; Nicolas, R.S.; Mendis, P.; Sofi, M.; Ngo, T. Investigation of strength and hydration characteristics in nano-silica incorporated cement paste. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2017, 80, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Krishnan, S.; Bishnoi, S. Understanding the hydration of dolomite in cementitious systems with reactive aluminosilicates such as calcined clay. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 108, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Antoni, M.; Rossen, J.; Martirena, F.; Scrivener, K. Cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and limestone. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012, 42, 1579–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zajac, M.; Rossberg, A.; Le Saout, G.; Lothenbach, B. Influence of limestone and anhydrite on the hydration of Portland cements. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2014, 46, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nasser, A.; Clément, A.; Laurens, S.; Castel, A. Influence of steel–concrete interface condition on galvanic corrosion currents in carbonated concrete. Corros. Sci. 2010, 52, 2878–2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Heukamp, F.H.; Ulm, F.-J.; Germaine, J.T. Poroplastic properties of calcium-leached cement-based materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2003, 33, 1155–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Singh, M.; Garg, M. Reactive pozzolana from Indian clays—their use in cement mortars. Cem. Concr. Res. 2006, 36, 1903–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Morandeau, A.; Thiery, M.; Dangla, P. Investigation of the carbonation mechanism of CH and CSH in terms of kinetics, microstructure changes and moisture properties. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014, 56, 153–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Aguirre-Guerrero, A.M.; Mejía-de-Gutiérrez, R.; Montês-Correia, M.J.R. Corrosion performance of blended concretes exposed to different aggressive environments. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 121, 704–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. ASTM International. ASTM C270-19-Standard Specification for Mortar for Unit Masonry; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The XRD patterns measured from Portland cement type CPII-F 32 (a) and hydrated lime (b).
Figure 1. The XRD patterns measured from Portland cement type CPII-F 32 (a) and hydrated lime (b).
Sustainability 13 11395 g001
Figure 2. The XRD patterns measured from natural kaolin (a) and calcined residues at 600 °C (b), 650 °C (c), 700 °C (d), 750 °C (e), and 800 °C (f). (M: Mica, Q: Quartz, and K: Kaolinite).
Figure 2. The XRD patterns measured from natural kaolin (a) and calcined residues at 600 °C (b), 650 °C (c), 700 °C (d), 750 °C (e), and 800 °C (f). (M: Mica, Q: Quartz, and K: Kaolinite).
Sustainability 13 11395 g002
Figure 3. The DTA curves of natural and calcined kaolin residues at 600 °C, 650 °C, 700 °C, 750 °C, and 800 °C.
Figure 3. The DTA curves of natural and calcined kaolin residues at 600 °C, 650 °C, 700 °C, 750 °C, and 800 °C.
Sustainability 13 11395 g003
Figure 4. The compressive strength and pozzolanic activity index values for mortar ref. and mortar KR 800 °C samples.
Figure 4. The compressive strength and pozzolanic activity index values for mortar ref. and mortar KR 800 °C samples.
Sustainability 13 11395 g004
Figure 5. The XRD patterns of aged mortars in the internal environment of the laboratory for 30 days (a); 180 days (b); and 360 days (c), and of the exposure to the external environment for 360 days (d) and 512 days (e). (P: Portlandite, E: Ettringite, Q: Quartz, and C: Calcite).
Figure 5. The XRD patterns of aged mortars in the internal environment of the laboratory for 30 days (a); 180 days (b); and 360 days (c), and of the exposure to the external environment for 360 days (d) and 512 days (e). (P: Portlandite, E: Ettringite, Q: Quartz, and C: Calcite).
Sustainability 13 11395 g005aSustainability 13 11395 g005b
Figure 6. The TGA and DTA curves of mortars subjected to curing periods in an internal environment for 30 days (a,b) and 360 days (c,d). All the samples were heated with a heating rate of 12.5 °C/min−1 and up to 1000 °C in a nitrogen gas atmosphere.
Figure 6. The TGA and DTA curves of mortars subjected to curing periods in an internal environment for 30 days (a,b) and 360 days (c,d). All the samples were heated with a heating rate of 12.5 °C/min−1 and up to 1000 °C in a nitrogen gas atmosphere.
Sustainability 13 11395 g006
Figure 7. The DTA curves of mortars subjected to curing periods in an external environment for 90 days (a) and 512 days (b). All the samples were heated with a heating rate of 12.5 °C/min−1 in a nitrogen gas atmosphere.
Figure 7. The DTA curves of mortars subjected to curing periods in an external environment for 90 days (a) and 512 days (b). All the samples were heated with a heating rate of 12.5 °C/min−1 in a nitrogen gas atmosphere.
Sustainability 13 11395 g007
Figure 8. The compressive strength and the percentage of increase/decrease in the aged mortars in the internal environment of the laboratory for 30, 60, 90, 180, and 360 days (a,c,e), and the exposure to the external environment for 90; 210; 360; and 512 days (b,d,f).
Figure 8. The compressive strength and the percentage of increase/decrease in the aged mortars in the internal environment of the laboratory for 30, 60, 90, 180, and 360 days (a,c,e), and the exposure to the external environment for 90; 210; 360; and 512 days (b,d,f).
Sustainability 13 11395 g008
Figure 9. The schematic representation of the microstructure of cementitious material with and without the addition of pozzolan.
Figure 9. The schematic representation of the microstructure of cementitious material with and without the addition of pozzolan.
Sustainability 13 11395 g009
Figure 10. The schematic representation of the carbonation process.
Figure 10. The schematic representation of the carbonation process.
Sustainability 13 11395 g010
Figure 11. The water absorption of the aged mortars in the internal environment of the laboratory for 30, 60, 90, 180, and 360 days.
Figure 11. The water absorption of the aged mortars in the internal environment of the laboratory for 30, 60, 90, 180, and 360 days.
Sustainability 13 11395 g011
Table 1. Nominal composition and percentages of cement replaced by calcined kaolin residue.
Table 1. Nominal composition and percentages of cement replaced by calcined kaolin residue.
DesignationPercentage of PC Replaced by KR (%)
PCKR
M0100-
M5955
M109010
M158515
M208020
M307030
Table 2. The chemical composition of Portland cement type CPII-F 32, hydrated lime, and kaolin residue.
Table 2. The chemical composition of Portland cement type CPII-F 32, hydrated lime, and kaolin residue.
Raw MaterialsOxides
SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3K2OMgOCaOSO3OthersLOI 1
PC19.610.31.1-11.538.08.31.59.7
HL1.60.60.10.31.672.3-0.423.1
KR58.836.00.21.62.2--0.40.8
1 LOI—Loss on ignition measured after drying at 110 °C and firing at 1000 °C.
Table 3. The particle diameters of the Portland cement (PC), hydrated lime (HL), and natural and calcined kaolin residues (KR) at 600 °C, 650 °C, 700 °C, 750 °C, and 800 °C.
Table 3. The particle diameters of the Portland cement (PC), hydrated lime (HL), and natural and calcined kaolin residues (KR) at 600 °C, 650 °C, 700 °C, 750 °C, and 800 °C.
Diameter and Specific AreaRaw Materials
PCHLKR NaturalKR 600 °CKR 650 °CKR 700 °CKR 750 °CKR 800 °C
D10 (µm)1.80.81.42.91.62.82.61.5
D50 (µm)13.85.79.314.310.114.113.89.4
D90 (µm)43.921.125.842.729.742.542.827.8
Dm (µm)19.19.012.119.013.618.818.712.8
Specific area (m2/g)--29.7324.9823.1825.1020.5225.95
D10 = Diameter at 10%; D50 = Diameter at 50%; D90 = Diameter at 90%; and Dm = Average diameter.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rodrigues, A.M.; Costa, F.P.d.; Beltrão, S.L.D.; Fernandes, J.V.; Menezes, R.R.; Neves, G.d.A. Development of Eco-Friendly Mortars Produced with Kaolin Processing Waste: Durability Behavior Viewpoint. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11395. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011395

AMA Style

Rodrigues AM, Costa FPd, Beltrão SLD, Fernandes JV, Menezes RR, Neves GdA. Development of Eco-Friendly Mortars Produced with Kaolin Processing Waste: Durability Behavior Viewpoint. Sustainability. 2021; 13(20):11395. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011395

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rodrigues, Alisson Mendes, Fabiana Pereira da Costa, Suellen Lisboa Dias Beltrão, Jucielle Veras Fernandes, Romualdo Rodrigues Menezes, and Gelmires de Araújo Neves. 2021. "Development of Eco-Friendly Mortars Produced with Kaolin Processing Waste: Durability Behavior Viewpoint" Sustainability 13, no. 20: 11395. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011395

APA Style

Rodrigues, A. M., Costa, F. P. d., Beltrão, S. L. D., Fernandes, J. V., Menezes, R. R., & Neves, G. d. A. (2021). Development of Eco-Friendly Mortars Produced with Kaolin Processing Waste: Durability Behavior Viewpoint. Sustainability, 13(20), 11395. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011395

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop