Correlation between Generation Z in Hungary and the Motivating Factors to Do Volunteer Work in a Value-Based Approach
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. The Motivational Background of Volunteering
- altruism: the rise in needs increase volunteering. This is related to social welfare. In a more challenged (poorer) society there might be a greater demand for volunteering.
- awareness of need: asking people directly can enhance the need for volunteering. When the members of society express their needs towards giving, it provides definitive evidence for its importance.
- costs and benefits: Smaller costs and mutual benefits strengthen volunteering. If the emergence of mutual benefits is confirmed, it solidifies the role of giving.
- reputation: the power of publicity expands the recognition of volunteering. Wider introduction of good examples and good practices is able to promote giving, thereby offering positive examples and affirmation for everybody.
- psichological costs and benefits: avoidance of certain psychological costs (guilt, anxiety), complience with personal standards and boosting a certain kind of self-image motivate volunteering.
- values: volunteering is determined by the values of the individuals. Mutuality, social responsibility or the principle of care appear among these prosocial values.
- efficacy: a more effective way of providing services to beneficiaries increases the need for volunteering [9].
2.2. Organizations That Support Volunteering
2.3. Appearance of Volunteering in the Life of the Enterprises, the Importance of CSR
3. Material and Method
4. Results
- −
- The first factor was “Adventurousness, hedonism”, with statements prioritizing risk-taking, which included statements prioritizing risk-taking, with the highest factor weight (0.83) being “enjoyment of risk-taking,” followed by trying adventures and exciting things (0.66). The importance of a stable and sound environment had a negative rating in this factor group—not surprisingly.
- −
- The dimension of “Will to act, desire for recognition” contained statements that emphasized recognition for good deeds and activities improving the world. With the highest factor weight (0.75), the attitude that did not want to blame anyone else for their own mistakes dominated the group.
- −
- The factor of “Empathy, social sensitivity” was constituted of values highlighting the intention of improving and helping others, unsurprisingly, with the highest factor weight (0.78), it is precisely the “offense due to disincentives to do” that has been included.
- −
- The factor of “Self-centeredness, low social sensitivity” could be characterized with values and attitudes that find helping others difficult to accept, and are therefore less open to it. The most striking element in this group (0.68) is the statement that the favor of others is particularly annoying to the individual.
- −
- The group of “Self-will, inflexibility” dominantly consisted of factors like for example “it is hard for me to accept other people’s opinion or will”, most strongly (0.63) the commitment to work and the difficulty of examining things from other aspects (0.62) influence the value system of the group of factors.
- −
- The first group is “The ones willing to act and desiring recognition”, who believe in their ability to make the world a better place and are looking for opportunities to do so, and in addition they are also longing for social recognition for their efforts.
- −
- The second group is “The socially sensitive”, people who are the most sensitive to social and environmental problems and when they are wrong, they are ready to admit it, which shows a personality that is able and willing to develop.
- −
- The third segment is “The inflexible with strong self-awareness” cluster, which consists of young people with self-will and inflexibility as their most typical features. They are the ones who rarely change their opinions, and they are easily offended if they don’t get their way.
- −
- The fourth group is “The adventurer hedonists”, who are less sensitive to social issues and other people’s problems, but on the other hand they love it when their lives are full of adventure and joy.
- −
- The fifth segment is for “The ones without preferences”, who did not rate any of the factor groups higher than the other segments. They are young people, whose value system is still evolving, and as a consequence they can sometimes be easily influenced.
5. Conclusions and Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mirsafian, H.; Mohamadinejad, A. Sport volunteerism: A study on volunteering motivations in university students. J. Hum. Sport Exerc. 2012, 7, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- International Labour Office. Manual on the Measurement of Volunteer Work; International Labour Office: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Owen, F.K.; Celik, N.D. Lifelong healthy lifestyle and wellness. Curr. Approaches Psychiatry 2018, 10, 440–453. [Google Scholar]
- Mundle, C.; Naylor, C.; Buck, D. Volunteering in Health and Care in England. A Summary of Key Literature. The KingsFund. 2012. Available online: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_related_document/volunteering-in-health-literature-review-kingsfund-mar13.pdf (accessed on 17 October 2021).
- Same, A.; McBride, H.; Liddelow, C.; Mullan, B.; Harris, C. Motivations for volunteering time with older adults: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morrow-Howell, N.; Hinterlong, J.; Rozario, P.; Tang, F. Effects of volunteering on the well-being of older adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. B 2003, 58, S137–S145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morrow-Howell, N. Volunteering in later life: Research frontiers. J. Gerontol. Ser. B 2010, 65, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stukas, A.A.; Snyder, M.; Clary, E.G. Understanding and encouraging volunteerism and community involvement. J. Soc. Psychol. 2016, 156, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekkers, R.; van Ingen, E.; de Wit, A.; van Groenou, M.B. Why do people volunteer? A review of the literature. In Proceedings of the 45th ARNOVA Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 17–19 November 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Silló, Á. The development of volunteering in post-communist societies: A review. Acta Univ. Sapientiae Soc. Anal. 2016, 6, 93–110. [Google Scholar]
- Betz, C.L. Generations X, Y, and Z. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2019, 44, A7–A8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Adamson, M.A.; Chen, H.; Kackley, R.; Micheal, A. For the love of the game: Game-versus lecture-based learning with generation Z patients. J. Psychosoc. Nurs. Ment. Heal. Serv. 2018, 56, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- ECO. Statistical tools for measuring volunteering. In Proceedings of the European Economic and Social Committee Public Hearing, Brussels, Belgium, 12 June 2013; Available online: https://www.b-b-e.de/fileadmin/Redaktion/05_Newsletter/02_Europa_Newsletter/2013/enl04_programme-hearing-12-june_en.pdf (accessed on 17 October 2021).
- Fry, R.; Parker, K. Early Benchmarks Show ‘Post-Millennials’ on Track to Be Most Diverse, Best-Educated Generation Yet: A Demographic Portrait of Today’s 6-to 21-Year-Olds; Pew Research Center: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Willems, R.; Drossaert, C.; Vuijk, P.; Bohlmeijer, E. Impact of crisis line volunteering on mental wellbeing and the associated factors: A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Juknevičius, S.; Savicka, A. From restitution to innovation: Volunteering in post-communist countries. In The Values of Volunteering: Cross-Cultural Perspectives; Dekker, P., Halman, L., Eds.; Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 127–142. [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, J. Volunteering. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2000, 2, 215–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paine, A.E.; Hill, M.; Rochester, C. Revisiting the Question: What Exactly is Volunteering? Working Paper Series: Paper One; Institute for Volunteering Research: Norwich, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Mihajlovic, M.; Komnenic, N.; Kastratovic, E.; Cilerdzic, V. Volunteers in sport organizations. Sport Manag. Int. J. 2010, 6, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anheier, H.K.; Lester, M.S. Volunteering in cross-national perspective. Initial comparison. Law Contem-Porary Probl. 2001, 62, 43–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Willigen, M. Differential benefits of volunteering across the life course. J. Gerontol. Ser. B 2000, 55, S308–S318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kuti, É. Reframing the NGO and civil society discourse: Perspectives from Eastern Europe. In Reconceptualising NGOs and their Roles in Development; Opoku-Mensah, P., Lewis, D., Tvedt, T., Eds.; Aalborg University: Aalborg, Denmark, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, J. Volunteerism research: A review essay. Non-Profit Volunt. Sect. Q. 2012, 41, 176–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.J.; Won, D. Understanding international volunteering: Who is most likely to participate? J. Nonprofit Public Sect. Mark. 2017, 30, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Solidarity Corps. The European Solidarity Corps Report 2018–2019. 2020. Available online: https://europa.eu/youth/sites/default/files/esc_ar_2018-2019_-_op_version.pdf (accessed on 12 October 2021).
- Woods, D.E. Volunteers in Community Development. Paris: Coordinating Committee for International Voluntary Service; UNESCO: Paris, France, 1971. [Google Scholar]
- Gillette, A. Aims and organization of voluntary service by youth. Community Dev. J. 1972, 7, 99–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furco, A. Service-Learning: A Balanced Approach to Experiential Education; Corporation for National Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Sherraden, M.S.; Lough, B.J.; McBride, A.M. Effects of international volunteering and service: Individual and institutional predictors. Volunt. Int. J. Volunt. Nonprofit Organ. 2008, 19, 395–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plewes, B.; Stuart, R. Opportunities and challenges for international volunteer co-operation. In IVCO Conference Report. Fitzroy, Australia; International Forum for Development Service: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Gáborné Szűcs, P. Distinctive competencies of a good leader—A good logistics manager. In LIM Conference 2020; Gubán, M., Ed.; Budapest Business School: Budapest, Hungary, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Meneghini, A.M. A meaningful break in a flat life: The motivations behind overseas volunteering. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 2016, 45, 1214–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wicker, P. Volunteerism and volunteer management in sport. Sport Manag. Rev. 2017, 20, 325–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, J.; Musick, M. Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1997, 62, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallup. The 2018 World’s Most Generous Countries Report, Understanding the Thoughts, Feelings and Behaviors of People Around the World. 2018. Available online: https://www.gallup.com/analytics/245165/worlds-most-generous-countries-2018.aspx (accessed on 12 October 2021).
- European Commission. Flash Eurobarometer 455. TNS Political and Capital. 2017. Available online: https://www.agenziagiovani.it/images/media/88554/Eurobarometro_Sintesi_Report_European_Youth_2017_en.pdf (accessed on 12 October 2021).
- Hajnalka, F.; Gabriella, K. 2011—European year of volunteering. Debreceni Szemle 2011, 4, 360–368. [Google Scholar]
- Rodell, J.B.; Booth, J.E.; Lynch, J.W.; Zipay, K.P. Corporate volunteering climate: Mobilizing employee passion for societal causes and inspiring future charitable action. Acad. Manag. J. 2017, 60, 1662–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Weissman, N.J. The importance of volunteering. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2014, 27, A13–A14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banta, K.; Boston, O. The Strategic Side Gig, HBR, May–June 2020. 2020. Available online: https://hbr.org/2020/05/the-strategic-side-gig (accessed on 14 January 2021).
- McFadden, A.; Smeaton, K. Amplifying student learning through volunteering. J. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pr. 2017, 14, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Studer, S. Volunteer management: Responding to the uniqueness of volunteers. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 2016, 45, 688–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A. Challenges and issues of generation Z. IOSR J. Bus. Manag. 2014, 16, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prensky, M. Digital natives, digital Immigrants. In On the Horizon; MCB University Press: Bingley, UK, 2001; Volume 9, pp. 1–6. Available online: https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf (accessed on 14 January 2021).
- Csehné, P.I.; Varga, E.; Szabó, K.; Szira, Z.; Hajós, L. The appearance of a new generation on the labour market, Annals of Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara. Int. J. Eng. 2017, 15, 123–130. [Google Scholar]
- Dimock, M. Defining Generations: Where Millennials End and Generation Z Begins, Pew Research Center 2019. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/ (accessed on 12 October 2021).
- Magasvári, A. Position-based human resources management system in Hungarian public service. Cust. Sci. J. 2017, 7, 63–70. [Google Scholar]
- Lazányi, K. An employer of my liking. In Michelberger Pál MEB 2014: Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking in the 21st Century; Óbudai Egyetem: Budapest, Hungary, 2014; pp. 211–220. [Google Scholar]
- Barba-Sánchez, V.; Atienza-Sahuquillo, C. Entrepreneurial intention among engineering students: The role of entrepreneurship education. Eur. Res. Manag. Bus. Econ. 2018, 24, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hagemeister, M.; Rodríguez-Castellanos, A. Knowledge acquisition, training, and the firm’s performance: A theoretical model of the role of knowledge integration and knowledge options. Eur. Res. Manag. Bus. Econ. 2019, 25, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malhotra, N.K.; Nunan, D.; Birks, D. Marketing Research: An Applied Approach, 5th ed.; Pearson: London, UK; Winchester Business School: Winchester, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Kahle, L.R.; Beatty, S.E.; Homer, P.E. Alternative measurement approaches to consumer values: The List of Values (LOV) and Values and Lifestyles (VALS). J. Consum. Res. 1986, 13, 405–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perczel, T. Life Strategy, Occupational Role, Value Orientation; Akadémia Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Garia-Fodor, M. The validity of value-based consumer behavioral models in the financial consciousness of the Z generation. Online J. Model. N. Eur. 2018, 27, 107–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Indicators | ||
---|---|---|
Period | Number of Nonprofit Organizations (Pc.) | Number of Volunteers (Pc.) |
2003 | 53.022 | 399.910 |
2004 | 55.197 | 448.004 |
2005 | 56.694 | 371.739 |
2006 | 58.242 | 437.893 |
2007 | 62.407 | 472.353 |
2008 | 64.925 | 402.537 |
2009 | 66.145 | 426.697 |
2010 | 64.987 | 418.407 |
2011 | 65.561 | 481.976 |
2012 | 65.255 | 503.713 |
2013 | 64.542 | 490.062 |
2014 | 63.894 | 489.897 |
2015 | 62.152 | 412.893 |
2016 | 61.616 | 418.655 |
2017 | 61.151 | 364.407 |
2018 | 61.491 | 399.328 |
2019 | 60.890 | 365.642 |
“Would You Like to be Part of a Volunteer Program where You Could Help Foundations OR Organizations by Sharing Your Expertise and Experience?” | Frequency (%) |
---|---|
(a) yes, I would be happy to participate in such a program | 28.9% |
(b) yes, I would be happy to attend, but only if I knew the organization who will be helped | 21.8% |
(c) yes, I would be happy to attend, but only if I am not alone participating (e.g., working in small groups or with the supervision of a more experienced professional) | 40.9% |
(d) under no circumstances I would participate in such a program | 8.4% |
Methods | Relative % |
---|---|
(a) personal recommendation from friends and acquaintances | 86.4% |
(b) shared posts/events/etc. from friends and acquaintances on social platforms (facebook, instagram, etc.) | 54.5% |
(c) from the organization’s own website | 27.3% |
(d) from the organization’s own social media site (facebook, instagram, etc.) | 38.2% |
(e) LinkedIn site | 15.5% |
(f) posters, public ads on streets | 16.4% |
(h) published on TV | 4.0% |
(i) published on radio | 5.5% |
Motivational Directions | Rating Average (Where 1 = Not Important at All, 7 = Most Important) |
---|---|
To develop my existing skills and knowledge | 5.79 |
To obtain new skills, knowledge and experiences | 5.76 |
The fate of humanity and our environment depends on our actions. | 5.71 |
These actions can also change the world. | 5.03 |
To try myself and to test my abilities | 5.22 |
To meet new people and to acquire new friends | 4.75 |
To feel better about myself | 3.65 |
To learn how people satisfy their needs | 3.55 |
To feel less alone | 3.43 |
Factors | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statements Related to Values | “Advent-Urousness, Hedonism” Factor | “Will to Act, Desire for Recognition” | “Empathy, Social Sensitivity” | “Self-Centered-Ness, Low Social Sensitivity” | “Self-Will, Inflexibility” |
I enjoy taking risks | 0.8346 | −0.169272 | 0.0273927 | −0.0501882 | 0.131448 |
I love adventures and trying new, exciting things | 0.660026 | 0.0959874 | −0.014761 | 0.0668645 | −0.076477 |
I like making decisions and acquiring wealth and social status | 0.605549 | −0.164056 | 0.0578431 | 0.1008488 | 0.331917 |
When I don’t know something, I’m not afraid to admit it | 0.544227 | 0.4229109 | −0.152735 | −0.2268132 | 0.021021 |
We have to take risks in order to achieve something in life | 0.44882 | 0.1780279 | 0.2008603 | 0.3761577 | −0.080054 |
I could never think of someone else being punished for my wrongdoings | −0.099375 | 0.7509963 | −0.138543 | 0.1463021 | −0.026105 |
I like protecting nature and supporting equality and social justice | 0.250792 | 0.6565009 | −0.008227 | −0.2103044 | −0.007895 |
I am always polite, even to those who I don’t sympathise with | −0.114288 | 0.5648716 | 0.2230724 | 0.0054619 | 0.035489 |
I like spending time on challenges that make the world a better place | 0.294914 | 0.4991698 | 0.117024 | −0.030607 | 0.103339 |
Sometimes I take offense when I don’t get my way | 0.040147 | −0.2059 | 0.7851717 | 0.1858399 | 0.043167 |
I smile when I see old couples holding each other’s hands | −0.0293 | 0.3518213 | 0.5774629 | −0.0681371 | −0.004052 |
I like living in a stable and sound environment and avoiding activities that can put my safety at risk | −0.019205 | −0.023039 | 0.5098532 | −0.2390666 | 0.426086 |
When I see people suffer, I wonder how they feel in that bad situation | 0.255179 | 0.3352441 | 0.4418067 | −0.0646246 | −0.250555 |
Sometimes I find people annoying who ask me for a favour | −0.129131 | 0.0473033 | −0.179317 | 0.6813488 | 0.353999 |
It is very difficult for me to visit a sick person | −0.025033 | −0.249437 | −0.015234 | 0.6727124 | 0.087577 |
Ideally I would live all my days as if they were my last | 0.382897 | 0.1252145 | 0.1669569 | 0.5295142 | −0.160603 |
My life is defined by work the most | 0.186159 | 0.0047514 | −0.025506 | 0.0170211 | 0.631369 |
Sometimes I have problems with seeing things from a different perspective | −0.371577 | −0.042301 | 0.1684979 | 0.0444436 | 0.629243 |
My life is mostly determined by what is happening in the world | 0.215754 | 0.0938915 | −0.045928 | 0.2405174 | 0.483809 |
Clusters | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factors | “The Ones Willing to Act and Desiring Recognition” N = 139 | “The Socially Sensitive” N = 159 | “The Inflexible with Strong Self-Awareness” N = 165 | “Adventurer Hedonists” N = 213 | “The Ones without Preferences” N = 164 |
“Adventurousness, hedonism” | −0.610016 | −0.471604 | 0.0938754 | 0.57513678 | 0.132828 |
“Will to act, desire for recognition” | 0.7905724 | 0.2105979 | −1.104374 | 0.545713 | −0.47189 |
“Empathy, social sensitivity” | −0.589847 | 0.7333361 | 0.4001184 | 0.43068533 | −1.17297 |
“Self-centeredness, low social sensitivity” | −0.687868 | −0.294443 | −0.310234 | 0.69089134 | 0.283285 |
“Self-will, inflexibility” | 0.562782 | −1.11791 | 0.7825956 | 0.30676765 | −0.57896 |
“Have You ever Participated in any Volunteer Activity, Program, or Project?” | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Clusters | %/ Adjusted Standardized Residual | I Have and I Would Love to Participate again in Volunteer Programs | I haven’t, but I Would Love to Participate in Volunteer Programs | I haven’t, and I don’t even Want to Participate in Volunteer Programs |
“The inflexible with strong self-awareness” | column % | 14.02 | 16.66 | 21.85 |
adjusted standardized residual | −1.59 | 0.07 | 1.93 | |
“The socially sensitive” | column % | 20.00 | 18.07 | 18.54 |
adjusted standardized residual | 2.645 | −0.53 | −0.13 | |
“The ones willing to act and desiring recognition” | column % | 21.49 | 20.33 | 13.90 |
adjusted standardized residual | 1.09 | 0.43 | −1.95 | |
“Adventurer hedonists” | column % | 28.95 | 26.27 | 15.23 |
adjusted standardized residual | 1.95 | 0.51 | −3.15 | |
“The ones without preferences” | column % | 15.52 | 18.64 | 30.46 |
adjusted standardized residual | −2.38 | −0.54 | 3.74 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Garai-Fodor, M.; Varga, J.; Csiszárik-Kocsir, Á. Correlation between Generation Z in Hungary and the Motivating Factors to Do Volunteer Work in a Value-Based Approach. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11519. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011519
Garai-Fodor M, Varga J, Csiszárik-Kocsir Á. Correlation between Generation Z in Hungary and the Motivating Factors to Do Volunteer Work in a Value-Based Approach. Sustainability. 2021; 13(20):11519. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011519
Chicago/Turabian StyleGarai-Fodor, Mónika, János Varga, and Ágnes Csiszárik-Kocsir. 2021. "Correlation between Generation Z in Hungary and the Motivating Factors to Do Volunteer Work in a Value-Based Approach" Sustainability 13, no. 20: 11519. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011519
APA StyleGarai-Fodor, M., Varga, J., & Csiszárik-Kocsir, Á. (2021). Correlation between Generation Z in Hungary and the Motivating Factors to Do Volunteer Work in a Value-Based Approach. Sustainability, 13(20), 11519. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011519