Next Article in Journal
Participatory Guarantee System and Social Capital for Sustainable Development in Brazil: The Case Study of OPAC Orgânicos Sul de Minas
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Urban Scale Energy Modelling and Multi-Objective Optimization Techniques for Building Energy Renovation at District Scale
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 13
Issue 20
10.3390/su132011539
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhancing Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation and Soybean Growth through Co-Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and Pseudomonas Isolates

by
Ting-Chen Tu
1,
Shih-Han Lin
1 and
Fo-Ting Shen
1,2,*
1
Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
2
Innovation and Development Center of Sustainable Agriculture (IDCSA), National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(20), 11539; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011539
Submission received: 26 August 2021 / Revised: 17 October 2021 / Accepted: 18 October 2021 / Published: 19 October 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The present study was undertaken to explore acidotolerant rhizobial and non-rhizobial bacteria associated with root nodules of soybean (Glycine max L.). Genotypic and phenotypic characterization regarding nitrogen fixation, nodulation and other potentially plant growth-promotion traits were performed in several isolates. Influences of bacterial inoculation on symbiotic nitrogen fixation and soybean growth were evaluated through flask and pot experiments in a greenhouse. The highest nitrogen-fixing activity was recorded in isolate Bra6, which was closely related to Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens based on 16S rDNA, nifH, and nodD gene sequences. All the non-rhizobial Pseudomonas isolates possessed multiple plant growth-promoting traits, with various hydrolytic patterns toward plant constituents. In sterile water agar-containing flasks, Bra6 + Pse2 treatment significantly (p < 0.05) increased the number of nodules, fresh weight, and dry weight of both root and shoot. This also led to the increment of most of the nutrients in the soybean plant compared with the uninoculated control or sole inoculation of Bra6. In non-sterile strongly acidic soil-containing pots, co-inoculation with Bra6 and various Pseudomonas isolates showed distinctively positive effects on symbiotic nitrogen fixation and soybean growth. The highest symbiotic nitrogen-fixing activity; root and shoot biomass; as well as N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Mn, Cu, and Zn contents of soybean plant were observed in Bra6 + Pse2 treatment. Synergistic symbiosis occurred through co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and Pseudomonas isolates, which further enhanced nutrients’ acquisition and growth of soybean in the strongly acidic soils.

1. Introduction

Studies on plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have attracted much attention in the last decade. Application of PGPR with promising traits was considered as an environmentally friendly approach to sustain plant growth, which also reduced the requirement of chemical fertilization [1]. Among the beneficial bacteria, rhizobia that are able to form a symbiotic relationship with their host legumes are well studied [2,3]. To establish proper nodule formation, bacterial infection and nodule organogenesis need to be coordinated in plant tissue through signaling cascades [4]. It is a considerable challenge to understand the mechanisms by which legumes recognize and discriminate rhizobia from pathogens, as well as between distinct rhizobia species and strains that differ in their symbiotic performance [5]. Besides, a variety of PGPR have been demonstrated to enhance the legume–rhizobia symbiosis through improving the nodulation and nitrogen fixation [6].
Soybean (Glycine max L.) is an agronomically and economically relevant leguminous plant cultivated worldwide. It also showed potential to increase soil fertility when used as green manure or cover crop [7,8,9]. Studies on bacterial community inside soybean nodules may help to explore effective participants involving in symbiotic nitrogen fixation and plant growth. It was reported that rhizobial subcommunities comprised mainly Ensifer and Bradyrhizobium, while the non-rhizobial groups were dominated by Proteobacteria and Firmicutes after screening nodule endophytes from fifty soybean fields [10]. Through the microbiome’s analyses of nodules from nine soybean cultivars, Sharaf et al. [11] indicated that rhizobia were mainly composed of the family Bradyrhizobiaceae. Besides, the non-rhizobia such as Pseudomonadaceae and Enterobacteriaceae also dominated in soybean nodules. Within Bradyrhizobiaceae, three genera, namely, Bradyrhizobium, Nitrobacter, and Tardiphaga, were consistently detected in almost 193 root nodules of nine soybean plants [12]. The OTU analysis further demonstrated that Bradyrhizobium dominated during the entire stage of soybean growth, while the ratio of non-rhizobial bacteria showed an increasing trend as the soybean growth progressed [13]. From a meta-analysis of studies (from 1987 to 2018) conducted on soybean, Zeffa et al. [14] summarized that co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and PGPR resulted in a significant increase in nodule number (11.40%), nodule biomass (6.47%), root biomass (12.84%), and shoot biomass (6.53%). Among these PGPR, members belonging to genera Azospirillum, Bacillus, and Pseudomonas were more effective than Serratia in the improvement of nodule formation and soybean growth.
In our previous study, soybean intercropping was demonstrated to ameliorate tea-cultivated environments through changing bacterial communities as well as edaphic properties [9]. However, the roots of soybeans failed to form nodules during the experimental period, which was probably because of the strongly acidic nature of the tea plantation soils. As different species and strains differ in their symbiotic performance, it is crucial to explore effective rhizobia and non-rhizobia participating in the nodulation and growth promotion of soybean, especially in strongly acidic soils. In the present study, attempts were made to trap acidotolerant nodule-associated bacteria from soybean grown in a slightly acidic tea plantation. Effective rhizobial isolates were screened by nodulation test, while potentially plant growth-promoting and plant constituent-hydrolyzing traits were determined in non-rhizobial isolates. Effects of co-inoculation with beneficial rhizobial and non-rhizobial isolates on symbiotic nitrogen fixation and soybean growth were evaluated in sterile water agar (flask experiment) and non-sterile strongly acidic soils (pot experiment). This was used to test the hypothesis that acidotolerant nodule-inhabitants participated in the establishment of effective association with soybean, which further enhanced symbiotic nitrogen fixation and plant growth in the strongly acidic soils.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation and Identification of Bacteria from Root Nodules

The green manure soybean (Glycine max L.) cultivar Tainan no. 7 was cultivated in a slightly acidic (pH 6.5) tea plantation for two months. Root nodules were collected and surface sterilized with 2% of sodium hypochlorite for 1 min followed by 70% of ethanol for 5 min. Another rinse with sterile water was repeated five times and the final rinse water was used to assess the sterilization process. Nodules were crushed and effluents were collected, serially diluted, and plated on acidic (pH 5) yeast extract mannitol agar (YEMA) [15]. Colonies that appeared within seven days of cultivation were picked and transferred several times to assure purity.
Genomic DNA was isolated from the three-day fresh cultures using the UltraClean Microbial Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. 16S rDNA was amplified by PCR with bacterial universal primers, purified, and sequenced as described in [16], and bacterial identification was then performed by comparing the 16S rDNA sequences of isolates and their most closely related type strains using the EzBioCloud 16S-based ID function [17]. The 16S rDNA sequences obtained in this study were deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under Accession Numbers MZ798477–MZ798484.

2.2. Characterization of nifH and nodD Genes in Rhizobial Isolates

The nifH gene, which encodes the dinitrogenase reductase, was amplified by PCR with primer pair nifHF and nifHI [18]. The amplification cycles included an initial denaturation for 3 min at 94 °C followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 57 °C, and 2 min at 72 °C, with a final extension of 3 min at 72 °C. The nodD gene, which encodes the transcriptional regulator LysR family, was amplified by PCR with primer pair nodD7f and aboxp2 [19]. The amplification cycles included an initial denaturation for 30 s at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles of 30 s at 96 °C, 1 min at 53 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C, with a final extension of 5 min at 72 °C. Both the nifH and nodD amplicons were purified using DNA Clean & Concentrator Kit (ZYMO RESEARCH CORP., USA). Cycle sequencing and determination of the nucleotide sequence of the amplicons were performed at Genomics BioSci&Tech Ltd., Taiwan. The NCBI GenBank database was used to identify the closely related sequences with the amplicons using the BLASTn program. Concatenated sequences from 16S rDNA, nifH, and nodD genes were aligned using ClustalX program version 2 [20] and distances and clustering with the neighbor-joining method were performed using the software package MEGA version 11 [21]. The nifH and nodD gene sequences obtained in this study were deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under Accession Numbers MZ803186–MZ803191.

2.3. Nodulation Test of Rhizobial Isolates

Isolates that were classified as rhizobia were tested for their abilities to induce nodulation of soybean in a growth chamber (8 h day/16 h night cycles) at 25 °C for 45 days. Isolates were grown on YEM for three days, and cells were then harvested by centrifugation, washed twice, and resuspended in YEM to obtain bacterial suspension. Seeds were surface sterilized with 30% of hydrogen peroxide for 5 min, 70% of alcohol for 5 min, and rinsed five times with sterile water. After soaking in the bacterial suspension for 3 h, three seeds were placed on the filter paper. Filter papers were then rolled up and placed in the beaker containing 500 mL of sterile water. After one week of cultivation, seedlings were thinned down to one on each filter paper. Every two weeks, 10 mL of nutrient solution [15] was supplemented. After 25 days of cultivation, 5 mL of the bacterial suspension was re-inoculated in bacterial inoculation treatments. Regarding the uninoculated treatment, which represented the control, only 5 mL of YEM was supplemented. Six replications were conducted for each treatment. After 45 days of cultivation, the number of nodules and the growth of soybean including root length, shoot length, and number of leaves were determined. Symbiotic nitrogen-fixing activities of nodules were assessed as described in [22] using an acetylene reduction assay [23].

2.4. Determination of Plant Growth-Promoting and Plant Constituent-Hydrolyzing Traits of Isolate Bra6 and Non-Rhizobial Isolates

The three-day fresh colonies grown on YEMA were subjected to plant growth-promoting and plant constituent-hydrolyzing characterization. The free-living nitrogen-fixing activities of the isolates were assessed as described in [16] using an acetylene reduction assay [23]. To test for isolates with phosphate-solubilizing activities, colonies were picked and inoculated on/in tricalcium phosphate-containing medium, which was modified from Pikovskaya medium [24] and contained (L−1 distilled water: glucose 10 g, (NH4)2SO4 0.5 g, Ca3(PO4)2 5 g, KCl 0.2 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O, 0.1 g, MnSO4 · 5H2O 0.001 g, FeSO4 · 7H2O 0.001 g, yeast extract 0.5 g, the pH was adjusted to 7.0 before autoclaving, and 2.5% of bacteriological agar powder was added when solid plates were prepared). To test for isolates with IAA-producing activities, colonies were picked and inoculated in YEM (pH 5 and 7) supplemented with 500 µg tryptophan mL−1. The phosphate-solubilizing and IAA-producing activities of the five-day cultures were determined by the colorimetric method as described in [25]. Production of siderophore was evaluated on CAS agar plate as described in [26].
The decomposition of plant constituents was assessed by culturing the substrates tested into nutrient agar (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) and inoculating the medium with isolates. The cellulolytic, pectinolytic, and amylolytic activities of isolates were evaluated by growing them on media supplemented with 0.5% of carboxymethylcellulose, pectin, and soluble starch, respectively. As for proteolytic activity determination, 1.5% of skimmed milk-containing nutrient agar was prepared. Bacterial cultures were cultivated at 30 °C for five days. The appearance of a clear zone was measured after the addition of specific reagents as described in [25].

2.5. Co-Inoculation Test in Sterile Water Agar through Flask Experiment

A preliminary co-cultural analysis was conducted to assess the compatibility of Bradyrhizobium isolate Bra6 and various Pseudomonas isolates. The three-day fresh cultures of each tested isolate were spread on the YEMA, and three paper discs filled with another tested cultures were placed on the same YEMA. After seven days of cultivation, the growths of both tested isolates were evaluated.
In the co-inoculation test, soybean was grown in sterile water agar-containing flasks for 60 days in greenhouse. The treatments included an uninoculated YEM control, sole inoculation of isolate Bra6, co-inoculation with Bra6, and various Pseudomonas isolates (Bra6 + Pse2, Bra6 + Pse3, Bra6 + Pse5, Bra6 + Pse6, Bra6 + Pse7). Seeds were surface sterilized with 2% of sodium hypochlorite for 5 min followed by 70% of ethanol for 5 min. Another rinse with sterile water was repeated five times and the final rinse water was used to assess the sterilization process. After soaking in the three-day cultures for 30 min, one seed was placed in the flask containing 200 mL of 0.7% water agar. After two weeks of cultivation, 2 mL of nutrient solution was supplemented. After three weeks of cultivation, 2 mL of the bacterial suspension was re-inoculated in bacterial inoculation treatments. As for the uninoculated treatment, only 2 mL of YEM was supplemented. Four replications were conducted for each treatment.
After 60 days of cultivation the number of nodules, fresh weight and dry weight (drying at 70 °C until a constant weight was obtained) of roots and shoots were determined. Plant N was measured by the Kjeldahl digestion method [27], as described in [28]. The P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, B, Na, and Al contents of the dried and powdered plant materials were digested in a mixture (5:1) of nitric acid and perchloric acid at 120–180 °C [29] before measurements by ICP-OES ULTIMA 2C with a sequential JY 138 ULTRACE spectrometer (HORIBA Jobin Yvon Inc., Edison, NJ, USA).

2.6. Co-Inoculation Test in Non-Sterile Strongly Acidic Soils through Pot Experiment

In another co-inoculation test, soybean was grown in strongly acidic soil-containing pots for 65 days in greenhouse. The properties of the soils were analyzed according to the procedures described in [9], and the results were as follows: pH, 4.06; EC, 0.098 dS m−1; total N, 0.11%; available P, 175.11 mg kg−1; available K, 176.33 mg kg−1; available Ca, 441.37 mg kg−1; available Mg, 44.22 mg kg−1; available Fe, 554.35 mg kg−1; available Mn, 16.82 mg kg−1; available Cu, 1.6 mg kg−1; available Zn, 2.07 mg kg−1; and available B, 0.5 mg kg−1. The treatments included an uninoculated YEM control, sole inoculation of isolate Bra6, co-inoculation with Bra6, and various Pseudomonas isolates (Bra6 + Pse2, Bra6 + Pse3, Bra6 + Pse5, Bra6 + Pse6, Bra6 + Pse7).
Seeds were surface sterilized and soaked in the three-day cultures as described previously. Five seeds were sown at a depth of 2 cm in the plastic pot (diameter, 10 cm; depth, 8.5 cm) containing 500 g of acidic soils. The pots were sprinkled with water. After one week of cultivation, seedlings were thinned down to three in each pot. Every week, 10 mL of nutrient solution was supplemented. After two weeks of cultivation, 2 mL of the bacterial cultures was re-inoculated in bacterial inoculation treatments. Regarding the uninoculated treatment representing the control, only 2 mL of YEM was supplemented. Three replications were conducted for each treatment. After 65 days of cultivation, the number and fresh weight of nodules, as well as fresh weight and dry weight of roots and shoots, were determined. Symbiotic nitrogen-fixing activity of nodules and nutrients of the above ground part were measured as described previously.
The results obtained for symbiotic nitrogen-fixing activity and plant growth were presented as mean values. One-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) and Duncan’s test (p < 0.05) were used to evaluate the significant differences between treatments using XLSTAT statistical software (New York, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Screening and Identification of Root Nodules-Associated Isolates

In this study, three rhizobial and five non-rhizobial isolates were obtained from acidic YEMA (Table 1 and Table 2). 16S rDNA sequence analysis assigned them to the genus Bradyrhizobium and Pseudomonas, respectively. Isolate Bra4 shared 16S rDNA similarity of 100% with Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA 76T, Bradyrhizobium pachyrhizi PAC 48T, Bradyrhizobium tropiciagri SEMIA 6148T, Bradyrhizobium brasilense UFLA 03-321T, and Bradyrhizobium ripae WR4T. Isolate Bra6 was closely related to Bradyrhizobium nanningense CCBAU 53390T (100%), Bradyrhizobium centrosematis A9T (100%), Bradyrhizobium guangxiense CCBAU 53363T (100%), and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110T (99.6%). Isolate Bra7 shared 16S rDNA similarity of 100% with Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110T and Bradyrhizobium niftali CNPSo 3448T. Isolate Pse2, Pse3, and Pse5 were most closely related to Pseudomonas punonensis CECT 8089T (99.6%), Pseudomonas mucoides P154aT (99.1%), and Pseudomonas atacamensis M7D1T (99.9%), respectively. Isolate Pse6 and Pse7, which showed the same sequence of 16S rDNA, shared the highest similarity of 100% with Pseudomonas glycinae MS586T.

3.2. Characterization of nifH and nodD Genes in Rhizobial Isolates

The nifH and nodD genes, which are associated with nitrogen fixation and nodulation, were successfully amplified and sequenced from three rhizobial isolates. Isolate Bra4 shared the highest sequence similarity of nifH (99.6%) and nodD (99.7%) with Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA 76T (Table 1). The sequence similarity of nifH and nodD between isolate Bra4 and other three closely related Bradyrhizobium species ranged from 89.9 to 95.4% and 86.9 to 94.5%, respectively. Both isolates Bra6 and Bra7 shared the highest sequence similarity of nifH (100%) and nodD (99.7%) with Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110T. Concatenated sequences from 16S rDNA, nifH, and nodD genes supported the assignment of isolate Bra4 to Bradyrhizobium elkanii, while isolate Bra6 and Bra7 were affiliated with Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (Figure 1).

3.3. Screening of Effective Rhizobial Isolates Inducing Root Nodulation

Three Bradyrhizobium isolates were separately served as inoculants to screen the effective partners forming symbiotic nitrogen fixation with soybean. After 45 days of cultivation, the formation of root nodules was found in all the treatments (Table 3). Compared with the uninoculated control, inoculation of isolate Bra4 or Bra7 showed a significantly (p < 0.05) higher number of nodules. There was no significant difference in root length, shoot length, and number of leaves between bacterial inoculation treatments. Isolate Bra6, which showed the highest symbiotic nitrogen-fixing activity, was selected and used in the following co-cultural analysis and co-inoculation experiments.

3.4. Plant Growth-Promoting and Plant Constituent-Hydrolyzing Traits of Isolate Bra6 and Non-Rhizobial Isolates

The in vitro tests were performed to evaluate plant growth-promoting potential of isolate Bra6 and five Pseudomonas isolates. All these isolates showed free-living nitrogen-fixing activities, which ranged from 0.027 to 0.337 nmol ethylene tube−1 h−1 (Table 4). On tricalcium phosphate agar plates, the clear zones around colonies of all Pseudomonas isolates were observed (Figure S1), and their phosphate-solubilizing activities ranged from 303.52 to 1391.43 µg mL−1. The production of siderophore was also observed in all Pseudomonas isolates (Figure S2). In tryptophan-containing YEM, all of them showed IAA producing activities at both pH 5 and pH 7 conditions. The higher amounts of IAA production (between 32.91 and 80.24 µg mL−1) were recorded at pH 7 in all these isolates.
Considering the plant constituent-hydrolyzing traits, all these isolates failed to produce a clear zone on carboxymethylcellulose-containing medium (Figure S3). Three isolates, namely, Pse5, Pse6, and Pse7, were positive in pectin degradation (Figure S4). Only isolate Bra6 and Pse2 showed amylolytic capabilities on soluble starch-containing medium (Figure S5). All these isolates except for Bra6 and Pse2 showed proteolytic capability, as revealed by the apparent clear zone around colonies on skimmed milk-containing medium (Figure S6).

3.5. Influence of Co-Inoculation on Nodulation and Soybean Growth in Sterile Water Agar Evaluated through Flask Experiment

The compatibility of Bradyrhizobium isolate Bra6 and various Pseudomonas isolates was evaluated through co-cultural analysis on the YEMA. Within seven days of cultivation, there was no apparent growth inhibition between isolate Bra6 and the tested Pseudomonas isolates (Figure 2). Therefore, all of them were further used in the following co-inoculation experiment.
In sterile water agar-containing flasks, there was no nodule formation during two months of soybean cultivation in the uninoculated control (Figure 3a). In contrast, sole inoculation of Bra6 or co-inoculation with Bra6 and various Pseudomonas isolates showed different influences on nodule development. The higher number of nodules was observed in both Bra6 + Pse2 and Bra6 + Pse6 treatments, while it was the lowest in Bra6 + Pse7 treatment. Compared with the uninoculated control, the fresh weight of root and shoot significantly (p < 0.05) increased by 22% and 32%, respectively, in Bra6 + Pse2 treatment (Figure 3b). This treatment also showed increments of 34% and 29% in the dry weight of root and shoot, respectively (Figure 3c). Besides, there were 25% and 24% increases in the dry weight of shoot in Bra6 + Pse3 and Bra6 + Pse6 treatments, respectively, compared with the uninoculated control.
Bra6 + Pse2 and Bra6 + Pse3 treatments significantly (p < 0.05) increased P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Mn, Zn, and B contents of soybean plant compared with the uninoculated control (Table 5). The highest Fe and Al contents were also recorded in Bra6 + Pse2 treatment. Bra6 + Pse5 treatment significantly increased the K, Ca, Mg, Mn, Zn, and B contents. Besides, higher K, Ca, Mg, S, and B contents were also recorded in Bra6 + Pse6 treatment compared with the uninoculated control. Among all these treatments, inoculation with Bra6 and Pse7 led to the lowest nutrient contents of soybean plant, no matter which element was used for comparison.

3.6. Influence of Co-Inoculation on Nodulation, Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation, and Soybean Growth in Non-Sterile Strongly Acidic Soils Evaluated through Pot Experiment

In non-sterile strongly acidic soil-containing pots, the number and fresh weight of nodules were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in bacterial inoculation treatments than in the uninoculated control after two months of cultivation (Figure 4a,b). There was no significant difference in nodule formation between sole inoculation of Bra6 or co-inoculation with Bra6 and various Pseudomonas isolates. Compared with the uninoculated control, co-inoculation with Bra6 and various Pseudomonas strains also increased symbiotic nitrogen-fixing activity to a significant level (Figure 4c). The highest nitrogen-fixing activity was recorded in Bra6 + Pse2 treatment. In consideration of soybean growth, sole inoculation of Bra6 increased the fresh weight of root and shoot by 13% and 8%, respectively (Figure 4d). Significant increments of 33%–53% in root fresh weight were observed in all the co-inoculation treatments, and there were 12% and 12% increases in shoot fresh weight in Bra6 + Pse2 and Bra6 + Pse3 treatments, respectively, compared with the uninoculated control. The highest dry weight of root and shoot was recorded in Bra6 + Pse2 treatment, with 26% and 13% increments compared with the uninoculated control (Figure 4e).
Compared with the uninoculated control, sole inoculation of Bra6 significantly (p < 0.05) increased the N, K, Ca, Mn, Cu, and B contents of soybean plant (Table 6). Co-inoculation with Bra6 and Pse2 showed a profound increment in most of the nutrients, with significantly higher N, K, Ca, Mg, S, Mn, Zn, and Na contents compared with Bra6-inoculated treatment. Other co-inoculation treatments also contributed to the accumulation of N, K, Ca, and Mn to a significant level compared with the uninoculated control.

4. Discussion

The genus Sinorhizobium has been found to be a dominant group in nodules of soybean grown in alkaline (pH 7.6–8.0) soils, whereas Bradyrhizobium was widely distributed and dominated in neutral to slightly acidic (pH 6.9–7.7) soils [30]. Comparative genomic analysis further revealed that genus-specific genes, known to be involved in alkaline–saline adaptations, likely contributed to the observed biogeographic patterns of these two genera in soybean [31]. Zhang et al. [10] also proposed that the grouping of Ensifer- (the heterotypic synonym of Sinorhizobium) and Bradyrhizobium-dominated clusters from soybean nodules was significantly related to soil pH. Recently, Bacillus cereus group was shown to promote and suppress the growth of Sinorhizobium and Bradyrhizobium, respectively, which affected rhizobial colonization and soybean nodulation under saline–alkali (pH 8) conditions [32]. Bakari et al. [33] demonstrated that soybean inoculation with Bradyrhizobium strains effectively increased nodulation and nitrogen fixation in moderately acidic (pH 5.6–5.9) soils. Furthermore, co-application of lime and rhizobial inoculation showed potential to increase nodulation and nitrogen fixation in strongly acidic (pH 4.3–4.8) soils. In this study, the acidotolerant isolate Bra6, which shared high similarity with Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110T in 16S rDNA (99.6%), nifH (100%), and nodD (99.7%), was recognized as the potential inoculant to induce nodulation of soybean in the strongly acidic (pH 4.06) soils. Previously, several strains belonging to Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens have also been found to nodulate and fix nitrogen when in symbiosis with soybean [34]. Besides, the genetic diversity and distribution of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens were explored in the rhizosphere of soybean grown in red soil [35].
Despite the fact that Bradyrhizobium spp. dominated in soybean nodules, many endophytic bacteria within nodules also showed influences on the soybean–microbe symbiosis and plant growth. Pseudomonas has been found as the dominant non-rhizobial group associated with soybean nodules [36]. The synergism between nodule endophyte Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bradyrhizobium sp. LSBR-3 was studied, which showed the improvement in plant growth and nutrient acquisition in soybean after dual inoculation [37]. Co-inoculation with Bacillus thuringiensis and Bradyrhizobium japonicum was demonstrated to enhance soybean nodulation and growth [38,39]. The number and weight of nodules increased, and root weight increased more often than shoot weight under greenhouse and field conditions. Compared with the uninoculated control, we also demonstrated a significant (p < 0.05) increment in the biomass of nodules and fresh weight of roots after co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and Pseudomonas isolates in strongly acidic soils. Pseudomonas isolates with potentially plant growth-promoting traits showed different influences on rhizobia-mediated symbiotic nitrogen fixation and soybean growth. Most of the Pseudomonas species closely related to our isolates have not been reported as soybean-associated bacteria, except that Pseudomonas glycinae MS586T was isolated from the soybean rhizosphere [40]. In this study, the non-rhizobial isolates Pse2, which shared the highest sequence similarity of 16S rDNA with Pseudomonas punonensis CECT 8089T, was demonstrated as the superior partner, showing a synergistic interaction with the rhizobial isolate Bra6.
Zeffa et al. [14] demonstrated that the effects of co-inoculation on plant growth varied according to the PGPR genus used as co-inoculant, as well as with the experimental conditions. Co-inoculation of soybean plants with seed-borne Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bradyrhizobium japonicum significantly improved nodulation, which could be due in part to the production of phytohormones [41]. High levels of IAA produced by nodule endophyte Bacillus megaterium or rhizobacterial Bacillus velezensis were also considered to aid the development of mature nodules, which thereby improved the nodular nitrogen fixation [42,43]. Defez et al. [44] further demonstrated that IAA-overproducing Ensifer meliloti inside nodules increased the activity of nitrogen-fixing apparatus and photosynthetic function. Besides, Pseudomonas fluorescens has been found to enhance the nitrogen fixation of soybean through promoting the growth and colonization of Bradyrhizobium japonicum [45]. Soybean symbiotic performance was improved by co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Azospirillum brasilense through quorum-sensing communication [46]. In this study, all the Pseudomonas isolates showed potential to produce IAA, which might influence the symbiotic outcome by altering phytohormonal homeostasis of soybean [47]. The possibility that metabolites such as siderophores might enhance nodule formation has also been proposed previously [48].
The entrance and survival of the endophytes in roots are generally in relation to their capabilities to hydrolyze plant constituents [49,50]. However, the constitutive release of plant cell wall-degrading enzymes such as pectinase by endophytic bacteria may confer plant pathogenicity [51]. Huang et al. [25] also proposed that endophytes with pectinase activity may be one of the factors contributing to the negative effects on plant growth. In this study, the pectinase activity was recorded in isolates Pse5, Pse6, and Pse7. Besides, the starch, which serves as the storage form of carbohydrates in soybean plant, was only utilized by isolate Bra6 and Pse2. It is assumed that both isolates proliferate using starch instead of pectin as its carbon source, which might be more compatible to the host plant. Moreover, the proteolytic activity was found in all four Pseudomonas isolates, except for Pse2. The ability of endophytes to hydrolyze protein might also have an influence on the rhizobium-mediated symbiotic nitrogen fixation, which needs to be clarified in the future.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the effective rhizobial isolates with nodule-inducing capability and non-rhizobial isolates possessing potential plant growth-promoting traits were obtained. Co-inoculation with acidotolerant Bradyrhizobium isolate Bra6 and various Pseudomonas isolates were demonstrated to enhance nodulation, symbiotic nitrogen fixation, nutrients’ acquisition, and biomass of soybeans in strongly acidic soils. This provided insight into the benefits after conducting soybean intercropping as well as bacterial inoculation in the strongly acidic tea-cultivated environments. Furthermore, efforts should be made to elucidate the mechanisms involved in the synergistic association between these isolates, which help to develop effective bioinoculants used to promote soybean growth.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su132011539/s1, Figure S1: Colony morphology of the five-day bacterial cultures with/without phosphate solubilizing capability on tricalcium phosphate-containing medium. Three replications of each isolate were performed on the same plate. Figure S2: Colony morphology of the five-day bacterial cultures with/without siderophore producing capability on CAS medium. Three replications of each isolate were performed on the same plate. Figure S3: Colony morphology of the five-day bacterial cultures without cellulolytic capability on carboxymethylcellulose-containing medium. Three replications of each isolate were performed on the same plate. Figure S4: Colony morphology of the five-day bacterial cultures with/without pectinolytic capability on pectin-containing medium. Three replications of each isolate were performed on the same plate. Figure S5: Colony morphology of the five-day bacterial cultures with/without amylolytic capability on soluble starch-containing medium. Three replications of each isolate were performed on the same plate. Figure S6: Colony morphology of the five-day bacterial cultures with/without proteolytic capability on skimmed milk-containing medium. Three replications of each isolate were performed on the same plate.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.-T.S., T.-C.T. and S.-H.L.; methodology, F.-T.S., T.-C.T. and S.-H.L.; software, F.-T.S.; validation, F.-T.S.; formal analysis, T.-C.T. and S.-H.L.; investigation, F.-T.S., T.-C.T. and S.-H.L.; resources, F.-T.S.; data curation, F.-T.S.; writing—original draft preparation, F.-T.S.; writing—review and editing, F.-T.S.; supervision, F.-T.S.; project administration, F.-T.S.; funding acquisition, F.-T.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology and in part by the Ministry of Education, Taiwan, R.O.C. under the Higher Education Sprout Project.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The 16S rDNA, nifH, and nodD gene sequences obtained in this study were deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under Accession Numbers MZ798477–MZ798484 and MZ803186–MZ803191.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Y.W. Lin and M.H. Hung for the technical assistance in plant and soil property analyses, and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Swarnalakshmi, K.; Yadav, V.; Tyagi, D.; Dhar, D.W.; Kannepalli, A.; Kumar, S. Significance of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in grain legumes: Growth promotion and crop production. Plants 2020, 9, 1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Spaink, H.P.; Kondorosi, A.; Hooykaas, P.J.J. The Rhizobiaceae; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, W.F.; Wang, E.T.; Ji, Z.J.; Zhang, J.J. Recent development and new insight of diversification and symbiosis specificity of legume rhizobia: Mechanism and application. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 131, 553–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Suzaki, T.; Kawaguchi, M. Root nodulation: A developmental program involving cell fate conversion triggered by symbiotic bacterial infection. Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. 2014, 21, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Clúa, J.; Roda, C.; Zanetti, M.E.; Blanco, F.A. Compatibility between legumes and rhizobia for the establishment of a successful nitrogen-fixing symbiosis. Genes 2018, 9, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Alemneh, A.A.; Zhou, Y.; Ryder, M.H.; Denton, M.D. Mechanisms in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria that enhance legume-rhizobial symbioses. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 129, 1133–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shin, C.-S.; Sharif, M.; Lee, H.-Y. Evaluating the effect of bacterial inoculation and fertilization on the soil nutrient status of coal mine soil by growing soybean (Glycine max) and shrub lespedeza (Lespedeza bicolor). Sustainability 2018, 10, 4793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Jiang, Y.-H.; Arafat, Y.; Letuma, P.; Ali, L.; Tayyab, M.; Waqas, M.; Li, Y.-C.; Lin, W.-W.; Lin, S.; Lin, W.-X. Restoration of long-term monoculture degraded tea orchard by green and goat manures application system. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Shen, F.T.; Lin, S.H. Priming effects of cover cropping on bacterial community in a tea plantation. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, B.; Du, N.; Li, Y.; Shi, P.; Wei, G. Distinct biogeographic patterns of rhizobia and non-rhizobial endophytes associated with soybean nodules across China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 643, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sharaf, H.; Rodrigues, R.R.; Moon, J.; Zhang, B.; Mills, K.; Williams, M.A. Unprecedented bacterial community richness in soybean nodules vary with cultivar and water status. Microbiome 2019, 7, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mayhood, P.; Mirza, B.S. Soybean root nodule and rhizosphere microbiome: Distribution of rhizobial and nonrhizobial endophytes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e02884-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sohn, S.-I.; Ahn, J.-H.; Pandian, S.; Oh, Y.-J.; Shin, E.-K.; Kang, H.-J.; Cho, W.-S.; Cho, Y.-S.; Shin, K.-S. Dynamics of bacterial community structure in the rhizosphere and root nodule of soybean: Impacts of growth stages and varieties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zeffa, D.M.; Fantin, L.H.; Koltun, A.; de Oliveira, A.L.M.; Nunes, M.P.B.A.; Canteri, M.G.; Gonçalves, L.S.A. Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium in soybean crop: A meta-analysis of studies from 1987 to 2018. PeerJ 2020, 8, e7905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Vincent, J.M. A Manual for the Practical Study of the Root-Nodule Bacteria; Blackwell Scientific: Oxford, UK, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang, Y.S.; Shen, F.T. Bioprospecting of facultatively oligotrophic bacteria from non-rhizospheric soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2016, 108, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yoon, S.H.; Ha, S.M.; Kwon, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Chun, J. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA and whole genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1613–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nzoué, A.; Miché, L.; Klonowska, A.; Laguerre, G.; de Lajudie, P.; Moulin, L. Multilocus sequence analysis of bradyrhizobia isolated from Aeschynomene species in Senegal. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 32, 400–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sterner, J.P.; Parker, M.A. Diversity and relationships of bradyrhizobia from Amphicarpaea bracteata based on partial nod and ribosomal sequences. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1999, 2, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Larkin, M.A.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.P.; Chenna, R.; McGettigan, P.A.; McWilliam, H.; Valentin, F.; Wallace, I.M.; Wilm, A.; Lopez, R.; et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2947–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hung, M.H.; Arun, A.B.; Shen, F.T.; Rekha, P.D.; Young, C.C. Indigenous rhizobia associated with native shrubby legumes in Taiwan. Pedobiologia 2005, 49, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hardy, R.W.F.; Burns, R.C.; Holsten, R.D. Application of the acetylene reduction assay for measurement of nitrogen fixation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1973, 5, 47–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pikovskaya, R.I. Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with the vital activity of some microbial species. Mikrobiologiya 1948, 17, 362–370. [Google Scholar]
  25. Huang, C.M.; Chen, W.C.; Lin, S.H.; Wang, Y.N.; Shen, F.T. Exploration of root-associated bacteria from the medicinal plant Platycodon grandiflorum. Microbes Environ. 2019, 34, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schwyn, B.; Neilands, J.B. Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 160, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kjeldahl, J. A new method for the determination of nitrogen in organic matter. Z. Anal. Chem. 1883, 22, 366–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Bremner, J.M. Nitrogen total. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3 Chemical Methods; Sparks, D.L., Page, A.L., Helmke, P.A., Loeppert, R.H., Soltanpour, P.N., Tabatabai, M.A., Johnston, C.T., Sumner, M.E., Eds.; Soil Science Society of America Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 1996; pp. 1085–1121. [Google Scholar]
  29. Miller, R.O. Nitric-perchloric acid wet digestion in an open vessel. In Handbook of Reference Methods for Plant Analysis; Kalra, Y.P., Ed.; CRC Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1998; pp. 57–61. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang, Y.M.; Li, Y.; Chen, W.F.; Wang, E.T.; Tian, C.F.; Li, Q.Q.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Sui, X.H.; Chen, W.X. Biodiversity and biogeography of rhizobia associated with soybean plants grown in the North China Plain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 6331–6342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tian, C.F.; Zhou, Y.J.; Zhang, Y.M.; Li, Q.Q.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Li, D.F.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Gilbert, L.B.; Li, Y.R.; et al. Comparative genomics of rhizobia nodulating soybean suggests extensive recruitment of lineage-specific genes in adaptations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 8629–8634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Han, Q.; Ma, Q.; Chen, Y.; Tian, B.; Xu, L.; Bai, Y.; Chen, W.; Li, X. Variation in rhizosphere microbial communities and its association with the symbiotic efficiency of rhizobia in soybean. ISME J. 2020, 14, 1915–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Bakari, R.; Mungai, N.; Thuita, M.; Masso, C. Impact of soil acidity and lime on soybean (Glycine max) nodulation and nitrogen fixation in Kenyan soils. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant. Sci. 2020, 70, 667–678. [Google Scholar]
  34. Delamuta, J.R.M.; Ribeiro, R.A.; Ormeño-Orillo, E.; Melo, I.S.; Martínez-Romero, E.; Hungria, M. Polyphasic evidence supporting the reclassification of Bradyrhizobium japonicum group Ia strains as Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 3342–3351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, L.; Chen, X.; Hu, S.; Zhan, Q.; Peng, W. Genetic diversity and distribution of rhizobia associated with soybean in red soil in Hunan Province. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 1971–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tokgöz, S.; Lakshman, D.K.; Ghozlan, M.H.; Pinar, H.; Roberts, D.P.; Mitra, A. Soybean nodule-associated non-rhizobial bacteria inhibit plant pathogens and induce growth promotion in tomato. Plants 2020, 9, 1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kumawat, K.C.; Sharma, P.; Sirari, A.; Singh, I.; Gill, B.S.; Singh, U.; Saharan, K. Synergism of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (LSE-2) nodule endophyte with Bradyrhizobium sp. (LSBR-3) for improving plant growth, nutrient acquisition and soil health in soybean. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bai, Y.; Zhou, X.; Smith, D.L. Enhanced soybean plant growth resulting from coinoculation of Bacillus strains with Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Crop. Sci. 2003, 43, 1774–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mishra, P.K.; Mishra, S.; Selvakumar, G.; Kundu, S.; Gupta, H.S. Enhanced soybean (Glycine max L.) plant growth and nodulation by Bradyrhizobium japonicum-SB1 in presence of Bacillus thuringiensis-KR1. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant. Sci. 2009, 59, 189–196. [Google Scholar]
  40. Jia, J.; Wang, X.; Deng, P.; Ma, L.; Baird, S.M.; Li, X.; Lu, S.E. Pseudomonas glycinae sp. nov. isolated from the soybean rhizosphere. Microbiologyopen 2020, 9, e1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Masciarelli, O.; Llanes, A.; Luna, V. A new PGPR co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum enhances soybean nodulation. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Subramanian, P.; Kim, K.; Krishnamoorthy, R.; Sundaram, S.; Sa, T. Endophytic bacteria improve nodule function and plant nitrogen in soybean on co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium japonicum MN110. Plant. Growth Regul. 2015, 76, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sibponkrung, S.; Kondo, T.; Tanaka, K.; Tittabutr, P.; Boonkerd, N.; Yoshida, K.-I.; Teaumroong, N. Co-inoculation of Bacillus velezensis strain S141 and Bradyrhizobium strains promotes nodule growth and nitrogen fixation. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Defez, R.; Andreozzi, A.; Romano, S.; Pocsfalvi, G.; Fiume, I.; Esposito, R.; Angelini, C.; Bianco, C. Bacterial IAA-delivery into Medicago root nodules triggers a balanced stimulation of C and N metabolism leading to a biomass increase. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Chebotar, V.K.; Asis, C.A.; Akao, S. Production of growth-promoting substances and high colonization ability of rhizobacteria enhance the nitrogen fixation of soybean when inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2001, 34, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. dos Santos Lima Fagotti, D.; Abrantes, J.L.F.; Cerezini, P.; Fukami, J.; Nogueira, M.A.; del Cerro, P.; Valderrama-Fernández, R.; Ollero, F.J.; Megías, M.; Hungria, M. Quorum sensing communication: Bradyrhizobium-Azospirillum interaction via N-acyl-homoserine lactones in the promotion of soybean symbiosis. J. Basic Microbiol. 2019, 59, 38–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Torres, D.; Benavidez, I.; Donadio, F.; Mongiardini, E.; Rosas, S.; Spaepen, S.; Vanderleyden, J.; Pěnčík, A.; Novák, O.; Strnad, M.; et al. New insights into auxin metabolism in Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Res. Microbiol. 2018, 169, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lucas-García, J.A.; Probanza, A.; Ramos, B.; Colón-Flores, J.J.; Gutiérrez-Mañero, F.J. Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) on the biological nitrogen fixation, nodulation and growth of Lupinus albus I. cv. Multolupa. Eng. Life Sci. 2004, 4, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hallmann, J.; Quadt-Hallmann, A.; Mahaffee, W.F.; Kloepper, J.W. Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops. Can. J. Microbiol. 1997, 43, 895–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rana, K.L.; Kour, D.; Kaur, T.; Devi, R.; Yadav, A.N.; Yadav, N.; Dhaliwal, H.S.; Saxena, A.K. Endophytic microbes: Biodiversity, plant growth-promoting mechanisms and potential applications for agricultural sustainability. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2020, 113, 1075–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Collmer, A.; Keen, N.T. The role of pectic enzymes in plant pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1986, 24, 383–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sustainability 13 11539 g001 550
Figure 1. Neighbor-joining tree with bootstrapping 1000 replicates showing the phylogenetic relationship of three rhizobial isolates and their most closely-related species based on the concatenated sequences from 16S rDNA, nifH, and nodD genes.
Figure 1. Neighbor-joining tree with bootstrapping 1000 replicates showing the phylogenetic relationship of three rhizobial isolates and their most closely-related species based on the concatenated sequences from 16S rDNA, nifH, and nodD genes.
Sustainability 13 11539 g001
Sustainability 13 11539 g002 550
Figure 2. Co-cultural analysis of Bradyrhizobium isolate Bra6 and various Pseudomonas isolates. Each tested isolate was spread on the YEMA (labeled as plate in the parentheses), and three paper discs filled with another tested cultures (labeled as spot in the parentheses) were placed on the same YEMA.
Figure 2. Co-cultural analysis of Bradyrhizobium isolate Bra6 and various Pseudomonas isolates. Each tested isolate was spread on the YEMA (labeled as plate in the parentheses), and three paper discs filled with another tested cultures (labeled as spot in the parentheses) were placed on the same YEMA.
Sustainability 13 11539 g002
Sustainability 13 11539 g003a 550Sustainability 13 11539 g003b 550
Figure 3. Effects of bacterial inoculation on the (a) number of nodules, (b) fresh weight of root and shoot, and (c) dry weight of root and shoot in sterile water agar evaluated through flask experiment. Control, uninoculated treatment. Error bar, mean (n = 4) ± standard deviation. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) in one-way ANOVA.
Figure 3. Effects of bacterial inoculation on the (a) number of nodules, (b) fresh weight of root and shoot, and (c) dry weight of root and shoot in sterile water agar evaluated through flask experiment. Control, uninoculated treatment. Error bar, mean (n = 4) ± standard deviation. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) in one-way ANOVA.
Sustainability 13 11539 g003aSustainability 13 11539 g003b
Sustainability 13 11539 g004a 550Sustainability 13 11539 g004b 550
Figure 4. Effects of bacterial inoculation on the (a) number of nodules, (b) fresh weight of nodules, (c) symbiotic nitrogen-fixing activity, (d) fresh weight of root and shoot, and (e) dry weight of root and shoot in strongly acidic soils evaluated through pot experiment. Control, uninoculated treatment. Error bar, mean (n = 3) ± standard deviation. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) in one-way ANOVA.
Figure 4. Effects of bacterial inoculation on the (a) number of nodules, (b) fresh weight of nodules, (c) symbiotic nitrogen-fixing activity, (d) fresh weight of root and shoot, and (e) dry weight of root and shoot in strongly acidic soils evaluated through pot experiment. Control, uninoculated treatment. Error bar, mean (n = 3) ± standard deviation. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) in one-way ANOVA.
Sustainability 13 11539 g004aSustainability 13 11539 g004b
Table
Table 1. Blast result of 16S rDNA, nifH, and nodD gene sequence obtained from rhizobial isolates.
Table 1. Blast result of 16S rDNA, nifH, and nodD gene sequence obtained from rhizobial isolates.
IsolateHit Taxon NameSimilarity
16S rDNAnifHnodD
Bra4Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA 76T1399/1399 (100%)734/737 (99.6%)328/329 (99.7%)
Bradyrhizobium pachyrhizi PAC 48T1399/1399 (100%)703/737 (95.4%)311/329 (94.5%)
Bradyrhizobium tropiciagri SEMIA 6148T1399/1399 (100%)662/734 (90.2%)284/327 (86.9%)
Bradyrhizobium brasilense UFLA 03-321T1399/1399 (100%)660/734 (89.9%)NA
Bradyrhizobium ripae WR4T1399/1399 (100%)NA †NA
Bra6Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110T1394/1399 (99.6%)737/737 (100%)327/328 (99.7%)
Bradyrhizobium nanningense CCBAU 53390T1399/1399 (100%)687/737 (93.2%)310/328 (94.5%)
Bradyrhizobium centrosematis A9T1399/1399 (100%)628/719 (87.3%)NA
Bradyrhizobium guangxiense CCBAU 53363T1262/1262 (100%)626/737 (84.9%)NA
Bra7Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110T1384/1384 (100%)737/737 (100%)327/328 (99.7%)
Bradyrhizobium niftali CNPSo 3448T1384/1384 (100%)669/737 (90.8%)303/328 (92.4%)
† NA: Sequence not available in NCBI GenBank database.
Table
Table 2. Blast result of 16S rDNA sequence obtained from non-rhizobial isolates.
Table 2. Blast result of 16S rDNA sequence obtained from non-rhizobial isolates.
IsolateHit Taxon NameSimilarity
Pse2Pseudomonas punonensis CECT 8089T1430/1436 (99.6%)
Pseudomonas straminea JCM 2783T1428/1435 (99.5%)
Pseudomonas argentinensis CH01T1428/1435 (99.5%)
Pse3Pseudomonas mucoides P154aT1221/1232 (99.1%)
Pseudomonas bijieensis L22-9T1420/1435 (99.0%)
Pseudomonas gessardii DSM 17152T1422/1439 (98.8%)
Pseudomonas mediterranea CFBP 5447T1422/1439 (98.8%)
Pse5Pseudomonas atacamensis M7D1T1448/1450 (99.9%)
Pseudomonas koreensis Ps 9-14T1447/1450 (99.8%)
Pse6Pseudomonas glycinae MS586T1450/1450 (100%)
Pseudomonas kribbensis 46-2T1448/1450 (99.9%)
Pse7Pseudomonas glycinae MS586T1450/1450 (100%)
Pseudomonas kribbensis 46-2T1448/1450 (99.9%)
Table
Table 3. Nodulation test of three rhizobial isolates.
Table 3. Nodulation test of three rhizobial isolates.
TreatmentRoot Length (cm)Shoot Length (cm)Number of LeavesNumber of NodulesNitrogen-Fixing Activity (nmol Ethylene h−1 Nodule−1)
Control †12.25 ± 3.66 a ‡14.00 ± 3.34 a17 ± 3 a1 ± 1 c0.10
Bra413.25 ± 1.60 a12.77 ± 2.98 a11 ± 1 b5 ± 2 a15.47
Bra612.25 ± 2.50 a13.00 ± 4.10 a13 ± 2 b3 ± 2 bc29.38
Bra713.83 ± 1.81 a13.33 ± 1.03 a11 ± 1 b4 ± 1 ab8.47
† Control: uninoculated treatment. ‡ Data represented as mean (n = 6) ± standard deviation. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) in one-way ANOVA.
Table
Table 4. Plant growth-promoting traits of the tested isolates.
Table 4. Plant growth-promoting traits of the tested isolates.
IsolateNitrogen-Fixing Activity (nmol Ethylene Tube−1 h−1)Phosphate-Solubilizing Activity (µg mL−1)Production of Siderophore (Halo Diameter/Colony Diameter)Production of IAA in Tryptophan-Containing YEM (µg mL−1)
pH 5pH 7
Bra60.337ND †NDNDND
Pse20.091311.331.113.3032.91
Pse30.040303.521.263.2235.11
Pse50.0811391.431.248.7073.76
Pse60.0531212.861.268.6178.29
Pse70.0271230.711.2911.2280.24
† ND: not detectable.
Table
Table 5. Effects of bacterial inoculation on the nutrient contents of soybean plant grown in sterile water agar-containing flasks.
Table 5. Effects of bacterial inoculation on the nutrient contents of soybean plant grown in sterile water agar-containing flasks.
TreatmentNPKCaMgSFeMnCuZnBNaAl
mg plant−1
Control †4.8 ± 0.7 a ‡0.9 ± 0.1 b1.9 ± 0.3 c0.5 ± 0.1 c0.5 ± 0.1 b0.5 ± 0.1 c0.027 ± 0.004 bc0.003 ± 0.000 c0.002 ± 0.000 bc0.006 ± 0.001 b0.008 ± 0.001 c0.4 ± 0.1 a0.014 ± 0.002 b
Bra64.8 ± 0.1 a0.9 ± 0.0 b2.3 ± 0.0 b0.6 ± 0.0 bc0.6 ± 0.0 b0.6 ± 0.0 b0.029 ± 0.001 ab0.004 ± 0.000 bc0.002 ± 0.000 c0.006 ± 0.000 b0.008 ± 0.000 bc0.3 ± 0.0 b0.016 ± 0.000 a
Bra6 + Pse24.5 ± 0.1 ab1.2 ± 0.0 a2.4 ± 0.1 ab0.7 ± 0.0 a0.7 ± 0.0 a0.7 ± 0.0 a0.031 ± 0.001 a0.004 ± 0.000 ab0.002 ± 0.000 ab0.007 ± 0.000 a0.011 ± 0.000 a0.4 ± 0.0 a0.017 ± 0.001 a
Bra6 + Pse34.8 ± 0.2 a1.2 ± 0.1 a2.7 ± 0.1 a0.7 ± 0.0 a0.7 ± 0.0 a0.6 ± 0.0 ab0.024 ± 0.001 c0.004 ± 0.000 ab0.002 ± 0.000 a0.007 ± 0.000 a0.011 ± 0.001 a0.4 ± 0.0 a0.013 ± 0.001 b
Bra6 + Pse54.8 ± 0.7 a1.0 ± 0.2 b2.5 ± 0.4 ab0.7 ± 0.1 a0.7 ± 0.1 a0.6 ± 0.1 bc0.019 ± 0.003 d0.004 ± 0.001 a0.001 ± 0.000 c0.008 ± 0.001 a0.009 ± 0.001 b0.3 ± 0.0 b0.011 ± 0.002 c
Bra6 + Pse64.0 ± 0.4 bc1.0 ± 0.1 ab2.4 ± 0.2 ab0.7 ± 0.1 ab0.7 ± 0.1 a0.6 ± 0.1 b0.017 ± 0.002 d0.003 ± 0.000 c0.002 ± 0.000 c0.006 ± 0.001 b0.009 ± 0.001 b0.4 ± 0.0 a0.010 ± 0.001 c
Bra6 + Pse73.6 ± 0.4 c0.6 ± 0.6 c1.4 ± 0.1 d0.4 ± 0.0 d0.4 ± 0.0 c0.3 ± 0.0 d0.012 ± 0.001 e0.002 ± 0.000 d0.001 ± 0.000 d0.003 ± 0.000 c0.005 ± 0.001 d0.2 ± 0.0 c0.008 ± 0.001 d
† Control: uninoculated treatment. ‡ Data represented as mean (n = 4) ± standard deviation. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) in one-way ANOVA.
Table
Table 6. Effects of bacterial inoculation on the nutrient contents of soybean plant grown in strongly acidic soils-containing pots.
Table 6. Effects of bacterial inoculation on the nutrient contents of soybean plant grown in strongly acidic soils-containing pots.
TreatmentNPKCaMgSFeMnCuZnBNaAl
mg plant−1
Control †8.3 ± 1.3 c ‡2.0 ± 0.1 ab9.6 ± 0.3 e6.0 ± 0.2 c2.7 ± 0.1 c2.7 ± 0.1 ab0.161 ± 0.004 a0.426 ± 0.011 d0.011 ± 0.000 bc0.055 ± 0.001 bc0.032 ± 0.001 de0.2 ± 0.0 d0.194 ± 0.005 a
Bra619.0 ± 0.3 b2.1 ± 0.1 a12.4 ± 0.4 bc7.3 ± 0.2 b3.0 ± 0.1 bc2.6 ± 0.1 b0.159 ± 0.005 a0.559 ± 0.017 b0.012 ± 0.000 a0.059 ± 0.002 b0.041 ± 0.001 a0.2 ± 0.0 cd0.158 ± 0.005 bc
Bra6 + Pse224.1 ± 0.8 a2.1 ± 0.1 a13.9 ± 0.3 a8.1 ± 0.2 a3.3 ± 0.1 a2.8 ± 0.7 a0.137 ± 0.003 b0.605 ± 0.015 a0.012 ± 0.000 a0.067 ± 0.002 a0.036 ± 0.001 bc0.2 ± 0.0 b0.169 ± 0.004 b
Bra6 + Pse318.9 ± 3.8 b2.0 ± 0.2 ab12.8 ± 1.0 b7.1 ± 0.6 b3.1 ± 0.2 ab2.6 ± 0.2 ab0.099 ± 0.008 e0.498 ± 0.039 c0.012 ± 0.001 ab0.058 ± 0.004 b0.034 ± 0.003 bcd0.2 ± 0.0 bc0.123 ± 0.009 f
Bra6 + Pse520.5 ± 1.2 ab1.7 ± 0.1 c10.8 ± 0.5 d6.9 ± 0.3 b2.9 ± 0.1 bc2.1 ± 0.1 c0.111 ± 0.005 d0.514 ± 0.025 bc0.009 ± 0.000 d0.055 ± 0.003 bc0.033 ± 0.002 cd0.2 ± 0.0 cd0.139 ± 0.007 de
Bra6 + Pse620.7 ± 2.7 ab1.8 ± 0.1 c11.5 ± 0.8 cd7.0 ± 0.5 b2.9 ± 0.2 bc2.3 ± 0.2 c0.111 ± 0.008 d0.508 ± 0.036 c0.012 ± 0.001 a0.052 ± 0.004 c0.029 ± 0.002 e0.3 ± 0.0 a0.131 ± 0.009 ef
Bra6 + Pse719.6 ± 2.2 b1.9 ± 0.0 bc11.5 ± 0.3 cd6.8 ± 0.2 b2.9 ± 0.1 bc2.3 ± 0.1 c0.122 ± 0.003 c0.538 ± 0.013 bc0.010 ± 0.000 c0.058 ± 0.001 b0.037 ± 0.001 b0.2 ± 0.0 d0.150 ± 0.004 cd
† Control: uninoculated treatment. ‡ Data represented as mean (n = 3) ± standard deviation. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) in one-way ANOVA.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tu, T.-C.; Lin, S.-H.; Shen, F.-T. Enhancing Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation and Soybean Growth through Co-Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and Pseudomonas Isolates. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11539. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011539

AMA Style

Tu T-C, Lin S-H, Shen F-T. Enhancing Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation and Soybean Growth through Co-Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and Pseudomonas Isolates. Sustainability. 2021; 13(20):11539. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011539

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tu, Ting-Chen, Shih-Han Lin, and Fo-Ting Shen. 2021. "Enhancing Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation and Soybean Growth through Co-Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and Pseudomonas Isolates" Sustainability 13, no. 20: 11539. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011539

APA Style

Tu, T. -C., Lin, S. -H., & Shen, F. -T. (2021). Enhancing Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation and Soybean Growth through Co-Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and Pseudomonas Isolates. Sustainability, 13(20), 11539. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011539

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop