The Mediating Role of the Social Identity on Agritourism Business
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- ❖
- What is the effect of entrepreneurial social capital on the development of entrepreneurial functional competencies?
- ❖
- Is social capital an asset for better development of the functional competencies of an entrepreneur of rural lodgings?
- ❖
- Does social capital facilitate the development of an entrepreneurial social identity?
2. Literature Review
2.1. Social Capital
2.2. Social Identity
2.3. Functional Competencies
3. Research Model and Hypothesis Development
4. Methodology
4.1. Research Instrument
4.2. Sample and Data Collection
4.3. Analytical Methods
5. Results and Discussion
5.1. Demographics of Participants
5.2. Factor Analysis
5.3. Assessment of Model Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling
6. Conclusions
7. Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Variables | Items | |
---|---|---|
Social capital | For you, the number of social ties with business experience in agritourism is very important. | Nahapiet & Ghoshal (1998) |
For you, work experience in the tourism sector is very important. | ||
For you, being village leaders is very important. | ||
For you, willingness to exchange employment and investment information is very important. | ||
For you, willingness to exchange money and other assets is very important. | ||
For you, confidence in family and friends for strong support in a crisis is very important. | ||
For you, trustworthiness to family and friends is very important. | ||
For you, encouraging young people to become independent by operating a business is very important. | ||
For you, paying close attention to and admiring successful entrepreneurs is very important. | ||
For you, attitude towards employment in tourism/hospitality is very important. | ||
Social identity | For you, the opportunity to create economic value and to create personal wealth over time has been an important driving force. | Fauchart & Gruber (2011) and Sieger et al., (2016) |
For you, the focus on profitability is very important. | ||
For you, success is that your business shows better financial performance compared to competitors. | ||
For you, your main motivation is to show your personality traits as an entrepreneurship. | ||
For you, your main motivation is related to offering a good and novel product that you know people have use for. | ||
For you, to be true to the original idea and deliver products of high quality to your customer segments, is most important. | ||
For you, success is that your products work well for those that are supposed to use them. | ||
For you, the main motivation is that through your firm, you can pursue values that are important to you or a particular cause. | ||
For you, success is that the firm can contribute to changes that make society a better place. | ||
For you, it is important to you that you manage to show that there are other and better ways to do things in accordance with your values. | ||
For you, eco- entrepreneur responsibility has been an important driving force to create your agritourism business. | ||
Functional competencies | For you, a business in agritourism helps the ability to take responsibility for solving a problem. | Lichtenstein and Lyons (2001) |
For you, a business in agritourism helps the emotional ability to cope with a problem. | ||
For you, a business in agritourism helps the ability to think critically. | ||
For you, a business in agritourism helps the ability to cooperate with others, networking and utilising contacts. | ||
For you, a business in agritourism helps the ability to reflect and to be introspective. | ||
For you, a business in agritourism helps the ability to recognise market gap, exploit market opportunity. | ||
For you, a business in agritourism helps the ability to operate a business and strategic planning. | ||
For you, a business in agritourism helps the ability to set personal goals, reach them and set new ones. | ||
For you, a business in agritourism helps the ability to make a persuasive communication and negotiation skills. |
References
- Roman, M.; Grudzien, P. The Essence of Agritourism and Its Profitability during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic. Agriculture 2021, 11, 458. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, A.; Moore, A.; Edwards, M. Feeding island dreams: Exploring the relationship between food security and agritourism in the Caribbean. Isl. Stud. J. 2018, 13, 145–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, R.; Kaplanidou, K. Building social capital from sport event participation: An exploration of the social impacts of participatory sport events on the community. Sport Manag. Rev. 2017, 21, 491–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khazami, N.; Lakner, Z. Influence of Social Capital, Social Motivation and Functional Competencies of Entrepreneurs on Agritourism Business: Rural Lodges. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aubert, F.; Berriet-Solliec, M.; Lepicier, D.; Schaeffer, Y. Appui Méthodologique à L’évaluation du Développement des Zones Rurales Fascicule 1: Diagnostic des Espaces Ruraux; UMR Cesaer: Dijon, France, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Kokou Dokou, G. The Identity of Start-Up Founder and Hi-Tech Entrepreneur Coaching; ISTE Ltd. OpenScience: London, UK, 2016; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- Hogg, M.; Terry, D. Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2020, 25, 121–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fafchamps, M. Social Capital and Development; University of Oxford: Oxford, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Bien Àngon, J.; Andjongo, E. Social capital and survival of the microenterprise:analysis from the motivation of the young entrepreneur. Revue du Contrôle de la Comptabilité et de l’Audit 2019, 4, 60–83. [Google Scholar]
- Maaroufi, M.; Tirou, N.; Mokhtari, N. Impact of entrepreneurial social capital on performance and access toexternal resources: Written review. Int. J. Econ. Manag. Res. 2020, 1, 102–127. [Google Scholar]
- Fauchart, E.; Gruber, M. Darwinians, Communitarians, and Missionaries: The Role of Founder Identity in Entrepreneurship. Acad. Manag. J. 2011, 54, 935–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xing, X.; Wang, J.; Tou, L. The Relationship between Green Organization Identity and Corporate Environmental Performance: The Mediating Role of Sustainability Exploration and Exploitation Innovation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mills, C.; Pawson, K. Integrating Motivation, Risk-Taking and Self Identity: A Typology of ICT Enterprise Development Narratives. Int. Small Bus. J. 2012, 30, 584–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Gelderen, M.; Jansen, P. Autonomy as a Start-up Motive. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2006, 13, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Praag, C.M. Some Classic Views on Entrepreneurship. De Econ. 1999, 147, 311–335. [Google Scholar]
- Lewis, P. The Search for an Authentic Entrepreneurial Identity: Difference and Professionalism among Women Business Owners. Gend. Work Organ. 2013, 20, 252–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, S.; Tripsas, M. The Accidental Entrepreneur: The Emergent and Collective Process of User Entrepreneurship. Strateg. Entrep. J. 2007, 1, 123–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bacq, S.; Janssen, F. The Multiple Faces of Social Entrepreneurship: A Review of Definitional Issues Based on Geographical and Thematic Criteria. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2011, 23, 373–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, R.; Latham, J.; Betta, M. Narrative Construction of the Social Entrepreneurial Identity. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2008, 14, 330–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lorrain, J.; Dussault, L. Relation between psychological characteristics, administrative behavior and success of founders entrepreneurs at the start-up stage. In Frontiers of Entrepreneurial Research; Babson College: Wellesley, MA, USA, 1988; pp. 150–164. [Google Scholar]
- Gartner, W. Who is the entrepreneur? Is the wrong question? Am. J. Small Bus. 1988, 12, 11–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Milton, D. The complete entrepreneur. Entrep. Theory Pract. 1989, 13, 9–19. [Google Scholar]
- Vesper, K. New Venture Strategies; Prentice Hall: Englewoods Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Herron, L.; Robinson, R. A structural model of the effects of entrepreneurial characteristics on venture performance. J. Bus. Ventur. 1993, 8, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandler, G.; Jansen, E. The founder’s self-assessed competence and venture performance. J. Bus. Ventur. 1992, 7, 223–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kramer, M. Social identity and social capital: The collective self at work. Int. Public Manag. J. 2006, 9, 25–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashforth, B.; Harrison, S.; Corley, K.G. Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions. J. Manag. 2008, 34, 325–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brewer, M. In-group Bias in the Minimal Intergroup Situation: A Cognitive Motivational Analysis. Psychol. Bull. 1979, 86, 307–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deaux, K.; Reid, A.; Mizrahi, K.; Getting, D. Connecting the Person to the Social: The Functions of Social Identification. In The Psychology of the Social Self; Tyler, T.R., Kramer, R., John, O., Eds.; Erlbaum: New York, NY, USA, 1999; pp. 91–113. [Google Scholar]
- Turner, J.C. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory; Basil Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Michel, A.; Jehn, K. The Dark Side of Identification: Overcoming Identification-Induced Performance Impediments. Res. Manag. Groups Teams 2003, 5, 189–219. [Google Scholar]
- Elsbach, D. An Expanded Model of Organizational Identification. Res. Organ. Behav. 1999, 21, 163–200. [Google Scholar]
- Kreiner, G.; Ashforth, B. Evidence toward an Expanded Model of Organizational Identification. J. Organ. Behav. 2004, 25, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pelled, L.; Eisenhardt, K.; Xin, K. Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict, and Performance. Adm. Sci. Q. 1999, 44, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chédotel, F. Avoir le sentiment de “faire partie d’une équipe”: De l’identification à la coopération. Management 2004, 7, 161–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reynolds, K.; Turner, J.; Haslam, S. Social Identity and Self-Categorization Theories: Contribution to Understanding Identification, Salience and Diversity in Teams and Organizations. Res. Manag. Groups Teams 2003, 5, 279–304. [Google Scholar]
- Lovelace, K.; Shapiro, D.; Weingart, L. Maximizing Cross-Functional New Product Teams’ Innovativeness and Constraint Adherence: A Conflict Communication Perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 2001, 44, 779–793. [Google Scholar]
- Nahapiet, J.; Ghoshal, S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1998, 23, 242–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sieger, P.; Gruber, M.; Fauchart, E.; Zellweger, T. Measuring the social identity of entrepreneurs: Scale development and international validation. J. Bus. Ventur. 2016, 31, 542–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lichtenstein, G.; Lyons, T. The Entrepreneurial Development System: Transforming Business Talent and Community Economies. Econ. Dev. Q. 2001, 15, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Matthews, L.M.; Matthews, R.L.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. Int. J. Multivar. Data Anal. 2017, 1, 107–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Felder, R.M.; Spurlin, J. Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles: A Meta-analysis. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 2005, 21, 103–112. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D. Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatcher, L. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS(R) System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Davis, J. Social capital and social identity: Trust and conflict. In Social Capital and Economics; Routledge: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, B.; Guo, J.; Qingwen, B.; Liangxing, S. What determines academic entrepreneurship success? A social identity perspective. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2019, 15, 929–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tansley, C.; Newell, S. Project social capital, leadership and trust: A study of human resource information systems development. J. Manag. Psychol. 2007, 22, 350–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henley, A.; Contreras, F.; Espinosa, J.; Barbosa, D. Entrepreneurial intentions of Colombian business students: Planned behaviour, leadership skills and social capital. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2017, 23, 1017–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCallum, S.; O’Connell, D. Social capital and leadership development: Building stronger leadership through enhanced relational skills. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 2009, 30, 152–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brändle, L.; Berger, E.; Golla, S.; Kuckertz, A. I am what I am—How nascent entrepreneurs’ social identity affects their entrepreneurial self-efficacy. J. Bus. Ventur. Insights 2018, 9, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, K.; Zhao, Y.; Luk, L. A Validated and Reliable Instrument Investigating Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Competency in Generic Skills. J. Eng. Educ. 2017, 106, 299–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liñán, F. Skill and value perceptions: How do they affect entrepreneurial intentions? Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2008, 4, 257–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baron, R.; Kenny, D. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social and psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51, 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keuchenius, A.; Törnberg, P.; Uitermark, J. Adoption and adaptation: A computational case study of the spread of Gravette’s weak ties hypothesis. Soc. Netw. 2021, 66, 10–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Demographic Characteristics | Category | Percent |
---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 63 |
Female | 37 | |
Age | 18–34 | 14 |
35–49 | 55 | |
50–60 | 31 | |
Education | High school | 42 |
Bachelor’s degree | 53 | |
Postgraduate (+5 years) | 5 | |
Income/monthly/person (dt *) | 1200–4500 dt | 77 |
4600 dt< | 23 |
Constructs | Dimensions | Indicators | Loadings | Cronbach’s Alpha | Rho_A | Composite Reliability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Social capital | 0.955 | 0.954 | 0.957 | |||
Structural capital | SCS1 SCS2 SCS3 | 0.877 0.812 0.734 | 0.848 | 0.864 | 0.922 | |
Relational capital | SCR1 SCR2 SCR3 SCR4 | 0.597 0.859 0.892 0.821 | 0.858 | 0.884 | 0.905 | |
Cognitive capital | SCC1 SCC2 SCC3 | 0.809 0.935 0.844 | 0.914 | 0.911 | 0.937 | |
Social identity | 0.954 | 0.984 | 0.960 | |||
Darwinian identity | SID1 SID2 SID4 | 0.935 0.815 0.924 | 0.889 | 0.915 | 0.933 | |
Communitarian identity | SIC1 SIC2 SIC3 | 0.685 0.751 0.871 | 0.727 | 0.754 | 0.846 | |
Missionary identity | SIM1 SIM3 SIM4 | 0.875 0.847 0.939 | 0.949 | 0.951 | 0.967 | |
Functional competencies of entrepreneur | FC1 FC2 FC4 FC8 FC9 | 0.817 0.786 0.819 0.655 0.677 | 0.789 | 0.855 | 0.868 |
Variables | Mean | SD | Excess Kurtosis | Skewness |
---|---|---|---|---|
Social capital | 4.625 | 1.102 | 0.897 | −1.582 |
Social identity | 3.922 | 1.088 | 0.720 | −1.433 |
Functional competencies | 4.230 | 0.879 | 1.485 | −1.470 |
Functional Competencies | Social Capital | Social Identity | |
---|---|---|---|
Functional competencies | 0.741 | - | - |
Social capital | 0.552 | 0.833 | - |
Social identity | 0.605 | 0.540 | 0.872 |
Total Effect (SC-> FC) | Direct Effect (SC-> FC) | Indirect Effects of (SC-> FC) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coefficient | p-Value | Coefficient | p-Value | Coefficient | SD | t-Value | p-Value | BI (5%, 95%) | |
0.435 | 0.000 | 0.161 | 0.083 | H: SC->SI->FC | 0.268 | 0.052 | 5.135 | 0.000 | 0.190, 0.365 |
Direct Effect Sign | Indirect Effect Sign | Product Sign (Direct Effect X Indirect Effect) | Type of Mediation |
---|---|---|---|
+0.161 | +0.268 | +0.038 | Complementary |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Khazami, N.; Lakner, Z. The Mediating Role of the Social Identity on Agritourism Business. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011540
Khazami N, Lakner Z. The Mediating Role of the Social Identity on Agritourism Business. Sustainability. 2021; 13(20):11540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011540
Chicago/Turabian StyleKhazami, Nesrine, and Zoltan Lakner. 2021. "The Mediating Role of the Social Identity on Agritourism Business" Sustainability 13, no. 20: 11540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011540
APA StyleKhazami, N., & Lakner, Z. (2021). The Mediating Role of the Social Identity on Agritourism Business. Sustainability, 13(20), 11540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011540