Support for the Development of Technological Innovations at an R&D Organisation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Methodology
- Literature in the area of research methods used within foresight, technology assessment and organisational capabilities assessment,
- Literature concerning the possibilities of integrating the concepts of foresight, technology assessment and organisational capabilities assessment,
- Practical examples of combining the concepts in question, and
- The author’s own experiences resulting from participation in the processes run in a collective way within projects applying the methods of foresight, technology assessment and organisational capabilities assessment indicating the weaknesses of an individual use of the concepts in question, and the need and advantages of their integration and application at all stages of the innovation process.
- Defining the objectives,
- Adopting the assumptions,
- Developing detailed modules referring to the particular stages of innovation processes: generation, realisation, and implementation, while taking into account the use of the triad of concepts: foresight, technology assessment and organisational capabilities assessment, and
- Implementing the approach in an R&D organisation.
- The proposed approach is meant for supporting strategic and operational decision-making processes in an R&D organisation referring to the generation, realisation and implementation of technological innovations,
- Three modules are distinguished, namely referring to the stages: generation, realisation and implementation of technological innovations,
- Within the detailed modules, the triad of the concepts: foresight, technology assessment and organisational capabilities assessment, is used in an integrated manner,
- Foresight is used for generating technological innovations; technology assessment comprises an analysis of innovations under development; and organisational capabilities assessment refers to the assessment of (1) operational capabilities used for the ongoing execution of tasks in the course of developing and implementing innovations and of (2) strategic capabilities aimed at building a stable position of an R&D organisation in the future,
- The modules are interrelated and the results of using the module at one stage constitute the necessary input for the application of the module at the next stage, namely, generating innovations as the basis for conducting the process of their development, and the end of the process of their realisation—the basis for starting activities aimed at their implementation,
- Interconnection of modules also takes place in the opposite direction to the course of the innovation process. This is the case with the innovation generation module—it is powered by both the results of the application of the innovation realisation module and the results of the use of the innovation implementation module, which provide input data to be used in the innovation generation process,
- On the operational layer, a project generator and algorithms relating to organisational capabilities assessment, identification of technological innovations, assessment of the implementation maturity level of technological solutions, and assessment of their commercial and innovation potential are used, and
- The proposed approach may be supplemented with additional elements (methods, procedures), if they are considered important in the process of its verification or practical application.
4. Results
- Select technological innovations characterised by high innovation level and market demand, consistent with the research priorities of a particular R&D organisation and for which there already is or where it is possible to acquire the operational organisational capabilities necessary for their implementation,
- Create an operational plan for the development of selected technological innovations,
- Provide the monitoring process in the course of technological innovations development,
- Prepare recommendations concerning the implementation of developed technological innovations,
- Indicate areas that require strengthening of operational organisational capabilities (financial, physical and material, human, information and management) to make possible the development of selected technological innovations, in the situations when the existing operational organisational capabilities are insufficient, and
- Identify areas that require strengthening of the strategic organisational capabilities to make it possible to improve the competitive position of an R&D organisation in the future.
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Adamiecki, K. O Nauce Organizacji; PWE: Warszawa, Poland, 1970. [Google Scholar]
- Ansoff, H.I. Strategic Management; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Drucker, P.F. Skuteczne Zarządzanie; PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Fayol, H. Administracja Przemysłowa I Ogólna Oraz nauka O Administracji W Zastosowaniu Do Państwa; WINOiK, Księgarnia Wł. Wilak: Poznań, Poland, 1947. [Google Scholar]
- Obłój, K. Zarządzanie. Ujęcie Praktyczne; PWE: Warszawa, Poland, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, F.W. The Principles of Scientific Management; Harper & Brothers: New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Webber, R.A. Zasady Zarządzania Organizacjami; PWE: Warszawa, Poland, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Ansoff, I. Strategies for Diversification. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1957, 35, 113–124. [Google Scholar]
- Drucker, P. Managing for Results; Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA, 1964. [Google Scholar]
- Peters, T.; Waterman, R.H. In Search of Excellence; Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
- Drucker, P.F. Innovation and Enterpreneurship; Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Hermann, P. Evolution of strategic management: The need for new dominant designs. Int. J. Manag. 2005, 7, 111–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keupp, M.M.; Palmié, M.; Gassmann, O. The strategic management of innovation: A systematic review and paths for future research. Int. J. Manag. 2012, 14, 367–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tohidi, H.; Jabbari, M.M. Innovation as a Success Key for Organizations. Procedia Tech. 2012, 1, 560–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Criscuolo, P.; Narula, R. Using multi-hub structures for international R&D: Organisational inertia and the challenges of implementation. Manag. Int. Rev. 2007, 47, 639–660. [Google Scholar]
- Nerkar, A.; Paruchuri, S. Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Manag. Sci. 2005, 51, 771–785. [Google Scholar]
- Mazurkiewicz, A.; Poteralska, B. Identifying and Overcoming Technology Transfer Barriers at R&D Organisations. In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Reading, UK, 19–20 September 2019; Liargovas, P., Kakouris, A., Eds.; Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited: Reading, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Mazurkiewicz, A.; Giesko, T.; Poteralska, B.; Hua Tan, K. Crossing the Chasm: Overcoming Technology Transfer Barriers Resulting from changing technical requirements in the process of innovation development in R&D Organisations. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şimşit, Z.T.; Vayvay, O.; Öztürk, Ö. An Outline of Innovation Management Process: Building a Framework for Managers to Implement Innovation. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 150, 690–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Irvine, J.; Martin, B.R. Foresight in Science, Picking the Winners; Dover: London, UK, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Cuhls, K. From Forecasting to Foresight Processes—New Participative Foresight Activities in Germany. J. Forecast. 2003, 22, 93–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, T.; Daim, T. A taxonomic review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2008, 75, 1396–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowosielski, S. Potencjał produkcyjny przedsiębiorstwa, istota, struktura i planowanie. Przeds. Zarz. 2012, 13, 81–93. [Google Scholar]
- Cuhls, K.E. Horizon Scanning in Foresight—Why Horizon Scanning is only a part of the game. Futures Foresight Sci. 2020, 2, e23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grunwald, A. Technology Assessment: Concepts and Methods. In Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bjørn, L. The concept of technology assessment—An entire process to sustainable development. Sust. Dev. 1997, 5, 111–117. [Google Scholar]
- Stojković, D.S.; Kovač, M.; Mitic, V. The Model of Organisational Capabilities Development. New Bus. Models 2014, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
- Poteralska, B. Application of foresight methods for the determination of priority research directions of the future. Malay Nation Foresight Mag. 2012, 1, 6–12. [Google Scholar]
- Poteralska, B. Technology Assessment Systems. Probl. Eksploat. 2013, 4, 93–102. [Google Scholar]
- Poteralska, B.; Mazurkiewicz, A. Complex Technology Assessment System of Innovative Products. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Reading, UK, 28–29 April 2016; Grant, K.A., Wise, S., Eds.; Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited: Reading, UK, 2016; pp. 221–230. [Google Scholar]
- Coates, J.F. Foresight in federal government policymaking. Futures Res. Q. 1985, 1, 29–53. [Google Scholar]
- Martin, B.R. Foresight in science and technology. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 1995, 7, 139–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grupp, H.; Linstone, H.A. National Technology Foresight Activities Around the Globe. Resurrection and New Paradigms. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1999, 60, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tubke, A.; Ducatel, K.; Gavigan, J.P.; Moncada-Paternò-Castello, P. Strategic Policy Intelligence: Current Trends, the State of Play and Perspectives; IPTS: Sewilla, Spain, 2001; 118p. [Google Scholar]
- Kuhlmann, S. Foresight and Technology Assessment as Complementing Evaluation Tools. In RTD Evaluation Toolbox—Assessing the Socio-Economic Impact of RTD-Policies—Strata Project HPV 1 CT 1999-00005; Fahrenkrog, G., Polt, W., Rojo, J., Tübke, A., Zinöcker, K.J., Eds.; European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS): Seville, Spain, 2002; pp. 171–176. [Google Scholar]
- Hines, A. A practitioner’s view of the future of futures studies. Futures 2002, 34, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barré, R. Foresights and their themes: Analysis, Typology and Perspectives. In The Role of Foresight in the Selection of Research Policy Priorities; European Commission: Seville, Spain, 2002; pp. 88–109. [Google Scholar]
- Georghiou, L. Evaluating Foresight and Lessons for Its Future Impact. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technology Foresight, Tokyo, Japan, 27–28 February 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Cuhls, K. Development and Perspectives of Foresight in Germany. Technikfolgenabschätzung 2003, 2, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harper, J.C. Malta Council for Science and Technology. In Technology Foresight Manual—Organisation and Methods; United Nations Industrial Development Organisation: Vienna, Austria, 2005; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- van der Duin, P. Qualitative Futures Research for Innovation; Eburon Academic Publishers: Delft, The Netherlands, 2006; 284p. [Google Scholar]
- Giaoutzi, M.; Sapio, B. In Search of Foresight Methodologies: Riddle or Necessity. In Recent Developments in Foresight Technology. Complex Networks and Dynamic Systems; Giaoutzi, M., Sapio, B., Eds.; Springer Science + Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Sacio-Szymańska, A.; Mazurkiewicz, A.; Poteralska, B. Corporate foresight at the strategic research institutes. Bus. Theory Pract. 2015, 16, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miles, I.; Saritas, O.; Sokolov, A. Foresight for Science, Technology and Innovation; Springer International Publishing: Basel, Switzerland, 2016; 270p. [Google Scholar]
- Dadkhah, S.; Bayat, R.; Fazli, S.; Tork, E.K.; Ebrahimi, A. Corporate foresight: Developing a process model. Eur. J. Futures Res. 2018, 8, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, A.; Barnard, B. Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Strategic Foresight: How Entrepreneurs Engage the Future as Opportunity. Expert J. Bus. Manag. 2019, 7, 11–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gordon, A.V.; Ramic, M.; Rohrbeck, R.; Spaniol, M.J. 50 Years of corporate and organizational foresight: Looking back and going forward. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 154, 119966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gariboldi, M.I.; Lin, V.; Bland, J.; Auplish, M.; Cawthorne, A. Foresight in the time of COVID-19. Lancet Reg. Health-Western Pacific 2021, 6, 100049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinson, D.K.R.; Schoen, A.; Larédo, P.; Molas Gallart, J.; Warnke, P.; Kuhlmann, S.; Ordóñez-Matamoros, G. Policy lensing of future-oriented strategic intelligence: An experiment connecting foresight with decision making contexts. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 169, 120803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brandscomb, L.M. Empowering Technology. Implementing a U.S. Strategy; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; London, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Mankins, J.C. Technology Readiness Levels: A white Paper, Advanced Concepts Office, Office of Space Access and Technology; NASA: Washington, DC, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Van Den Ende, J.; Mulder, K.; Knot, M.; Moors, E.; Vergragt, P. Traditional and Modern Technology Assessment: Toward a Toolkit. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1998, 58, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berloznik, R.; Van Langenhove, L. Integration of Technology Assessment in R&D Management Practices. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1998, 58, 23–33. [Google Scholar]
- Rezagholi, M.; Frey, M. Managing Engineering and Product Technology: A Method for Technology Assessment. In Product Focused Software Process Improvement, Proceedings of the Second International Conference; Bomarius, F., Oivo, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2000; pp. 180–192. [Google Scholar]
- Hsu, Y.-G.; Tzeng, G.-H.; Shyu, J.Z. Fuzzy multiple criteria selection of government-sponsored frontier technology R&D projects. R D Manag. 2003, 33, 539–551. [Google Scholar]
- Bhatnagar, D.; Jancy, A. Technology assessment methodology. The experience of India’s TIFAC. Technol. Monit. 2003, 22–27. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Technology-assessment-methodology-The-experience-of-Bhatnagar-Jancy/753f33502d3a88335c9b2ccfdfffbbba45d131f5 (accessed on 10 September 2021).
- Fleischer, T.; Decker, M.; Fiedeler, U. Assessing emerging technologies—Methodological challenges and the case of nanotechnologies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2005, 72, 1112–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assefa, G.; Eriksson, O.; Frostell, B. Technology assessment of thermal treatment technologies using ORWARE. Energy Convers. Manag. 2005, 46, 797–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Davila, T.; Epstein, M.J.; Shelton, R. Making Innovation Work. How to Manage It, Measure It and Profit from It; Wharton School Publishing: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, K.; Park, K.; See, S. A matrix approach for telecommunications technology selection. Comput. Ind. Eng. 1997, 33, 833–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lucheng, H.; Yafei, L.; Feifei, W. A Conceptual Framework of Identifying the Commercialization Potential of Emerging Technology Based on Subjective Judgment and Objective Fact. In Proceedings of the PICMET ‘07-2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology, Portland, OR, USA, 5–9 August 2007; pp. 1743–1747. [Google Scholar]
- Hongjun, W.; Xiaofei, Z.; Rui, L.; Guiwu, W. An Approach to Potential Evaluation of Emerging Technology Commercialization with Uncertain Linguistic Information. J. Converg. Inf. Tech. 2007, 7, 77–85. [Google Scholar]
- Rui, L.; Xiaofei, Z.; Hongjun, W.; Guiwu, W. Model for Potential Evaluation of Emerging Technology Commercialization with Hesitant Fuzzy Information. J. Converg. Inf. Tech. 2007, 4, 304–311. [Google Scholar]
- Kulkarni, V.; Ramachandra, T.V. Environmental Management, 2nd ed.; TERI Press: New Delhi, India, 2009; 394p. [Google Scholar]
- Disruptive Technology Assessment Game ‘DTAG’ Handbook V0.1. Available online: https://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjBrKrP-4_0AhValWoFHdfiAtsQFnoECAYQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.innovationhub-act.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fdocs%2FDTAG%2520handbook.pdf&usg=AOvVaw37KEuyMFatWkAn7I0MErCR (accessed on 10 September 2021).
- Mazurkiewicz, A.; Belina, B.; Poteralska, B.; Giesko, T.; Karsznia. Universal methodology for the innovative technologies assessment. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Reading, UK, 17–18 September 2015; Dameri, R.P., Beltrametti, L., Eds.; Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited: Reading, UK, 2015; pp. 458–467. [Google Scholar]
- Barney, J.B. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. J. Manag. 1991, 17, 99–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romanowska, M. Strategie Rozwoju i Konkurencji; Centrum Informacji Menedżera: Warszawa, Poland, 1998; pp. 42–43. [Google Scholar]
- Barney, J.B.; Mackey, T.B. Testing Resource-Based Theory. In Research Methodology in Strategy and Management; Ketchen, D.J., Bergh, D.D., Eds.; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2005; Volume 2, pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Lichtarski, J. Podstawy Nauki O Przedsiębiorstwie; Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu: Wrocław, Poland, 2007; 162p. [Google Scholar]
- Seppänen, M.; Mäkinen, S. Towards a classification of resources for the business model concept. Int. J. Manag. Concepts Philos. 2007, 2, 389–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seppänen, M. Empirical classification of resources in a business model concept. Intang. Capital 2009, 5, 102–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gierszewska, G.; Romanowska, M. Analiza Strategiczna Przedsiębiorstwa; Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne: Warszawa, Poland, 2009; 243p. [Google Scholar]
- Penc-Pietrzak, I. Planowanie Strategiczne W Nowoczesnej Firmie; Wolters Kluwer Polska: Warszawa, Poland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Kałkowska, J.; Pawłowski, E.; Trzcielińska, J.; Trzcieliński, S.; Włodarkiewicz-Klimek, H. Zarządzanie Strategiczne. Metody Analizy Strategicznej Z Przykładami; Politechnika Poznańska: Poznań, Polska, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Godziszewski, B.; Haffer, M.; Stankiewicz, M.J.; Sudoł, S. Przedsiębiorstwo. Teoria I Praktyka Zarządzania; PWE: Warszawa, Poland, 2011; p. 188. [Google Scholar]
- Jokiel, G. Identyfikacja i wykorzystanie potencjału organizacyjnego w zarządzaniu projektami. Przeds. Zarz. 2012, 17, 39–49. [Google Scholar]
- Masłyk-Musiał, E.; Rakowska, A.; Krajewska-Bińczyk, E. Zarządzanie Dla Inżynierów; Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne: Warszawa, Poland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Zakrzewska-Bielawska, A. Zarządzanie strategiczne w przedsiębiorstwach wysokich technologii. In Zarządzanie Projektami W Przedsiębiorstwie Informatycznym. Metodologia I Strategia Zarządzania; Werewka, J., Ed.; Wydawnictwo AGH: Kraków, Poland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Stabryła, A. Agregatowa analiza diagnostyczna w badaniu systemów organizacyjnych. In Praktyka Projektowania Systemów Organizacyjnych Przedsiębiorstwa; Stabryła, A., Ed.; Mfiles.pl, Seria Wydawnicza: Encyklopedia Zarządzania: Kraków, Poland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Sobieraj, J. Przegląd Wiedzy W Zakresie Rozwoju Strategii, Zarządzania Strategicznego I Analizy Strategicznej; Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Technologii Eksploatacji—PIB: Radom, Poland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Grupp, H. Technologie am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts; Physica-Verlag HD: Heidelberg, Germany, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Porter, A.L. Technology assessment. Impact Assess 1995, 13, 135–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loveridge, D. Foresight, Technology Assessment and Evaluation—Synergy or Disjunction? Ideas in Progress. Paper Number 5. ASTPP Meeting. In Proceedings of the CEC ASTPP Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996; Available online: https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/uk-ac-man-scw:2b2293 (accessed on 10 September 2021).
- Rip, A. Challenges for Technology Foresight/Assessment and Governance. Final Report of the STRATA Consolidating Workshop. European Commission. Directorate-General for Research. Unit RTD-K.2– “Science and Technology foresight; links with the IPTS”. 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Kameoka, A.; Yokoo, Y.; Kuwahara, T. A challenge of integrating technology foresight and assessment in industrial strategy development and policymaking. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2004, 71, 579–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, T.; von der Gracht, H.A.; Hartmann, E. Technology foresight for sustainable road freight transportation: Insights from a global real-time Delphi study. Futures Foresight Sci. 2021, e2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sripaipan, C. Foresight in a Non-Profit Organisation: A Case of the Technology Promotion Association (Thailand-Japan), Second International Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis: Impact of FTA Approaches on Policy and Decision-Making. 2006. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Foresight-in-a-Non-profit-Organisation%3A-A-Case-of-Sripaipan-Advisor/e06a25bbce08c76b7fb026759e904eae6e088c31 (accessed on 31 December 2006).
- Popper, R. How are Foresight Methods Selected? Foresight 2008, 10, 62–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szewczyk, R.; Piwiński, J.; Missala, T.; Kacprzyk, J.; Tomasik, J.; Woźniak, A.; Salach, J.; Iwasińska-Kowalska, O.; Winiarski, W.; Kłoda, R.; et al. Foresight Priorytetowych, Innowacyjnych Technologii Na Rzecz Automatyki, Robotyki I Techniki Pomiarowej. Metodologia, Analizy I Diagnoza Stanu Obecnego; Państwowy Instytut Automatyki i Pomiarów: Warszawa, Poland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Fleisher, C.S.; Bensoussan, B.E. Business and Competitive Analysis: Effective Application of New and Classic Methods; FT Press: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2015; p. 590. [Google Scholar]
- Nazarko, J.; Ejdys, J.; Halicka, K.; Magruk, A.; Nazarko, Ł.; Skorek, A. Application of Enhanced SWOT Analysis in the Future-oriented Public Management of Technology. Procedia Eng. 2017, 182, 482–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daim, T.; Gerdsri, N.; Basoglu, N. Technology Assessment. Forecasting Future Adoption of Emerging Technologies; Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH & Co. KG: Berlin, Germany, 2011; 242p. [Google Scholar]
- Lucheng, H.; Xin, L.; Wenguang, L. Research on emerging technology selection and assessment by technology foresight and fuzzy consistent matrix. Foresight 2010, 12, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazarko, J. Podlaska Strategia Rozwoju Nanotechnologii do 2020 roku. Przełomowa Wizja Regionu, Politechnika Białostocka, Białystok, Poland. 2013. Available online: http://www.nazarko.pl/public/data/resource/upload/00003/2426/file/podlaska_strategia_rozowju_nanotechnologii_do_2020_roku.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2021).
- Ziółkowski, B. Technology Assessment in Foresight for Podkarpacie Province towards Regional Innovation Policy. Probl. Ekspl. 2014, 4, 95–107. [Google Scholar]
- Martin, B.; Irvine, J. Research Foresight: Priority-Setting in Science; Pinter Publishers: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Krawczyk, E.; Slaughter, R.A. New generations of futures methods. Futures 2010, 42, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibson, E.; Daim, T.; Garces, E.; Dabic, M. Technology Foresight: A Bibliometric Analysis to Identify Leading and Emerging Methods. Foresight STI Gov. 2018, 12, 6–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rohrbeck, R. Exploring value creation from corporate-foresight activities. Futures 2012, 44, 440–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Könnölä, T.; Ahlqvist, T.; Eerola, A.; Kivisaari, S.; Koivisto, R. Management of foresight portfolio: Analysis of modular foresight projects at contract research organisation. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2009, 21, 381–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, M. Shaping Tomorrow’s Practical Foresight Guide. 2013. Available online: https://shapingtomorrow.com/files/media-centre/pf-ch01.pdf (accessed on 25 October 2021).
- Warnke, P.; Cuhls, K.; Schmoch, U.; Daniel, L.; Andreescu, L.; Dragomir, B.; Gheorghiu, R.; Baboschi, C.; Curaj, A.; Parkkinen, M.; et al. 100 Radical Innovation Breakthroughs for the future. The Radical Innovation Breakthrough Inquirer, European Commission; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019; 333p. [Google Scholar]
- Grin, J.; Grunwald, A. Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in 21st Century Society: Towards a Repertoire for Technology Assessment; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Azzone, G.; Manzinib, R. Quick and dirty technology assessment: The case of an Italian Research Centre. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2008, 75, 1324–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grunwald, A. Technology Assessment in Practice and Theory; Routledge: England, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Poteralska, B. Metodyka Wspomagania Rozwoju Innowacji Technologicznych W Jednostce Badawczej; Biblioteka Problemów Budowy i Eksploatacji Maszyn, KBM PAN, Wydawnictwo Naukowe ITeE-PIB: Radom, Poland, 2018; 241p. [Google Scholar]
- Bütschi, D. Strengthening Technology Assessment for Policy-Making, Report of the Second Parliamentary TA Debate on 7–8 April 2014, Lisbon; TA-SWISS, Centre for Technology Assessment: Bern, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Keenan, M.; Marvin, S.; Winters, C. Mobilising the Regional Foresight Potential for an Enlarged European Union, STRATA-ETAN Expert Group Action; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- McDowall, W.; Eames, M. Forecasts, Scenarios, Visions, Backcasts and Roadmaps to the Hydrogen Economy: A Review of the Hydrogen Futures Literature. Energy Policy 2006, 34, 1236–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Georghiou, L.; Harper, J.C.; Keenan, M.; Miles, I.; Popper, R. The Handbook of Technology Foresight: Concepts and Practice; PRIME Series on Research and Innovation Policy; Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.: Cheltenham, UK, 2008; 456p. [Google Scholar]
- Salo, A.; Cuhls, K. Technology foresight—Past and future. J. Forecast. 2003, 22, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuhlmann, S. Distributed Techno-Economic Intelligence for Policymaking. In RTD Evaluation Toolbox—Assessing the Socio-Economic Impact of RTD-Policies, Strata Project HPV 1 CT 1999-00005; Fahrenkrog, G., Polt, W., Rojo, J., Tübke, A., Zinöcker, K., Eds.; European Commssion, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS): Seville, Spain, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Breiner, S.; Cuhls, K.; Grupp, H. Technology foresight using a Delphi approach: A Japanese-German co-operation. R D Manag. 1994, 24, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazurkiewicz, A.; Poteralska, B. Technology transfer barriers and challenges faced by R&D organisations. Procedia Eng. 2017, 182, 457–465. [Google Scholar]
- Kuhlmann, S.; Boekholt, P.; Georghiou, L.; Guy, K.; Héraud, J.-A.; Laredo, P.; Lemola, T.; Loveridge, D.; Luukkonen, T.; Polt, W.; et al. Improving Distributed Intelligence in Complex Innovation Systems. Final Report of the Advanced Science and Technology Policy Planning Network (ASTPP); ASTPP Thematic Network: Karlsruhe, Germany, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Poteralska, B.; Łabędzka, J. Technological foresight-based methodology for research directions identification. Ekon. Org. Przeds. 2015, 10, 3–16. [Google Scholar]
- Rothwell, R. Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. Int. Mark. Rev. 1994, 11, 7–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coleman, F.; Benekohal, R.F.; Shim, E. Technology Transfer Activities and Models—Survey Findings from Technology Transfer Agencies. Final Report, Department of Civil Engineering; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Champaign, IL, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Rothwell, R. Industrial innovation: Success, strategy, trends. In The Handbook of Industrial Innovation; Dodgson, M., Rothwell, R., Eds.; Edward Elgar: Aldershot, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Trott, P. Innovation Management and New Product Development, 3rd ed.; Pearson Education Limited: Harlow, England, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Chesbrough, H.; Vanhaverbeke, W.; West, J. Open Innovation: Researching A New Paradigm; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2008; p. 400. [Google Scholar]
- Bailey, R.E. The Development of a Practical Planning Framework for International Technology Transfer. Proc. Technol. Transf. Soc. Int. Symp. 1990, 7–19. [Google Scholar]
- Weisgerber, R.; Armstrong, T. Facilitating the Transfer of Rehabilitation Technology. A Guide for VA Investigators, the Transfer Officer and the Center Director; American Institutes for Research: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Reddy, A. A Macro Perspective on Technology Transfer; Quorum Books: Westport, CT, USA; London, UK, 1996; p. 139. [Google Scholar]
- Technology Demonstrations and Application Centres in the EU. Empirical Survey and Policy Implications; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium; Luxemburg, 1995.
Individual Use of Concepts Supporting Innovation Processes | |||
---|---|---|---|
Foresight | Technology Assessment (2nd Stream) | Organisational Capabilities Assessment | |
Irvine and Martin 1984 [20] Coates 1985 [31] Martin 1995 [32] Grupp and Linstone 1999 [33] Tubke et al. 2001 [34] Kuhlman 2002 [35] Hines 2002 [36] Barré 2002 [37] Georghiou 2003 [38] Cuhls 2003 [39] Harper 2005 [40] van der Duin 2006 [41] Giaoutzi and Sapio 2013 [42] Sacio et al. 2015 [43] Miles et al. 2016 [44] Dadkhah et al. 2018 [45] Brown and Barnard 2019 [46] Gordon et al. 2020 [47] Gariboldi et al. 2021 [48] Robinson et al. 2021 [49] | Brandscomb 1993 [50] Mankins 1995 [51] van den Ende et al. 1998 [52] Berloznik and van Langenhove 1998 [53] Rezagholi, Frey 2000 [54] Hsu et al. 2003 [55] Bhatnagar, Jancy 2003 [56] Fleischer et al. 2005 [57] Assefa et al. 2005 [58] Davila et al. 2006 [59] Kim et al. 2007 [60] Lucheng et al. 2007 [61] Hongjun et at 2007 [62] Rui et al. 2007 [63] Tran and Daim 2008 [22] Kulkarni, Ramachandra 2009 [64] DTAG 2010 [65] Mazurkiewicz et al. 2015 [66] | Barney 1991 [67] Romanowska 1998 [68] Barney, Mackey 2005 [69] Lichtarski 2007 [70] Seppänen, Mäkinen 2007 [71] Seppänen 2009 [72] Gierszewska, Romanowska 2009 [73] Penc-Pietrzak 2010 [74] Kałkowska et al. 2010 [75] Godziszewski et al. 2011 [76] Jokiel 2012 [77] Masłyk-Musiał et al. 2012 [78] Zakrzewska-Bielawska 2012 [79] Stabryła 2015 [80] Sobieraj 2017 [81] | |
Integrated Use of Concepts Supporting Innovation Processes | |||
Foresight and Technology assessment | Foresight and Organisational Capabilities Assessment | Technology assessment and Organisational capabilities assessment | Foresight, Technology assessment and Organisational capabilities assessment |
Grupp 1993 [82] Porter 1995 [83] Loveridge 1996 [84] Kuhlmann 2002 [35] Rip 2002 [85] Kameoka et al. 2004 [86] Meyer et al. 2021 [87] | Sripaipan 2006 [88] Popper 2008 [89] Szewczyk et al. 2008 [90] Fleisher, Bensoussan 2015 [91] Nazarko et al. 2017 [92] | Daim et al. 2011 [93] | Lucheng et at. 2010 [94] Nazarko 2013 [95] Ziółkowski 2014 [96] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Poteralska, B. Support for the Development of Technological Innovations at an R&D Organisation. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12469. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212469
Poteralska B. Support for the Development of Technological Innovations at an R&D Organisation. Sustainability. 2021; 13(22):12469. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212469
Chicago/Turabian StylePoteralska, Beata. 2021. "Support for the Development of Technological Innovations at an R&D Organisation" Sustainability 13, no. 22: 12469. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212469
APA StylePoteralska, B. (2021). Support for the Development of Technological Innovations at an R&D Organisation. Sustainability, 13(22), 12469. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212469