Impact of Industry 4.0 Platform on the Formation of Construction 4.0 Concept: A Literature Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
- (i)
- The topic search field included the title, abstract, and keywords of the articles;
- (ii)
- The search period is limited to 2014–2020;
- (iii)
- Research articles, journals, conference papers, and conference proceedings were included;
- (iv)
- The subject area was delimited to Engineering, Computer Science, Materials Science areas;
- (v)
- Selected articles must be in English only or written in two languages, one of which is English;
- (vi)
- Articles should all have open access.
3. Results
3.1. Bibliometric Analysis
3.2. Interrelation of Industry 4.0 and Construction 4.0 Technologies
4. Discussion
- Visual Studio—the development tool of the application software;
- SQL Azure—the database service deployed on the cloud platform;
- Autodesk Revit—the BIM tool;
- Revit Live—software for generating a VR scene through a 3D model;
- UAV with integrated functions of camera, laser scanning and orientation for real-time construction model acquisition;
- GPS helmets to capture workers’ locations in real time;
- RFID technology for tracking prefabricated components;
- Sensors for remote environmental monitoring (wind-force, wind-direction, humidity, dust, temperature and noise sensors).
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Allen, C.; Shakantu, W. The BIM Revolution: A Literature Review on Rethinking the Business of Construction. In WIT Transactions on Ecology and Environment, 204, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Urban Regeneration and Sustainability, Alicante, Spain, 12–14 July 2006; WIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bahrin, M.A.K.; Othman, M.F.; Azli, N.H.N.; Talib, M.F. Industry 4.0: A review on industrial automation and robotic. J. Teknol. (Sci. Eng.) 2016, 78, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nowotarski, P.; Paslawski, J. Industry 4.0 concept introduction into construction SMEs. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 245, 052043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zabidin, N.S.; Belayutham, S.; Ibrahim, K.I. A Bibliometric and scientometric mapping of Industry 4.0 in construction. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2020, 25, 287–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manufuture High-Level Group. Manufuture Vision 2030: Competitive, Sustainable and Resilient European Manufacturing. 2018. Available online: http://www.manufuture.org/wp-content/uploads/Manufuture-Vision-2030_DIGITAL.pdf (accessed on 2 March 2021).
- Forcael, E.; Ferrari, I.; Opazo-Vega, A.; Pulido-Arcas, J.A. Construction 4.0: A literature review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, Z.; Feng, L. Integration of Industry 4.0 related technologies in construction industry: A Framework of Cyber-Physical System. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 122908–122922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oesterreich, T.D.; Teuteberg, F. Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Comput. Ind. 2016, 83, 121–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alaloul, W.S.; Liew, M.S.; Zawawi, N.A.W.A.; Kennedy, I.B. Industrial Revolution 4.0 in the construction industry: Challenges and opportunities for stakeholders. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2020, 11, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamelink, C.J. New Information and Communication Technologies, Social Development and Cultural Change. Development 1997, 48, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, T.; Adafin, J.; Wilkinson, S. Review of digital technologies to improve productivity of New Zealand construction industry. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2019, 24, 569–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perrier, N.; Bled, A.; Bourgault, M.; Cousin, N.; Danjou, C.; Pellerin, R.; Roland, T. Construction 4.0: A survey of research trends. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2020, 25, 416–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glas, A.H.; Kleemann, F.C. The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Procurement and Supply Management: A Conceptual and Qualitative Analysis. Int. J. Bus. Manag. Invent. 2016, 5, 2319–8028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y. Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2017, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, Y.; Deschamps, F.; Loures, E.d.F.R.; Ramos, L.F.P. Past, present and future of Industry 4.0—A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 55, 3609–3629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Craveiro, F.; Duarte, J.P.; Bartolo, H.; Bartolo, P.J. Additive manufacturing as an enabling technology for digital construction: A perspective on Construction 4.0. Autom. Constr. 2019, 103, 251–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Sun, C. Emerging information technology acceptance model for the development of smart construction system. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2018, 24, 457–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.L.; Cheah, W.T.; Lau, S.H.; Lee, X.S.; Abdullahi, A.M.; Wong, S.Y. Evaluation of practicality of virtual design and construction (VDC) with 5D building information modelling (BIM) through a case study. In IOP Conf. Series: Mat. Science and Engin. 943, Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Materials Technology and Energy, Saidia, Morocco, 13–15 April 2020; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schönbeck, P.; Löfsjögård, M.; Ansell, A. Quantitative review of construction 4.0 Technology presence in construction project research. Buildings 2020, 10, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lasi, H.; Fettke, P.; Kemper, H.-G.; Feld, T.; Hoffmann, M. Industry 4.0. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2014, 6, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berger, R. Digitization in the Construction Industry: Building Europe’s Road to “Construction 4.0”; Roland Berger GMBH: Munich, Germany, 2016; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- VOSviewerTM—Visualizing Scientific Landscapes. Available online: https://www.vosviewer.com (accessed on 23 January 2021).
- Bai, C.; Dallasega, P.; Orzes, G.; Sarkis, J. Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 229, 107776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, D. The Internet of Things. How the Next Evolution of the Internet Is Changing Everything; White Paper, Cisco IBSG: San Jose, CA, USA, 2011; pp. 1–11. Available online: https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/about/ac79/docs/innov/IoT_IBSG_0411FINAL.pdf (accessed on 2 March 2021).
- Kagermann, H.; Wahlster, W.; Helbig, J. Umsetzungsempfehlungen für das Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0. In Abschlussbericht des Arbeitskreises Industrie 4.0; Acatech: Frankfurt, Germany, 2013; pp. 1–116. [Google Scholar]
- Zareiyan, B.; Khoshnevis, B. Effects of interlocking on interlayer adhesion and strength of structures in 3D printing of concrete. Autom. Constr. 2017, 83, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stannard, L. Construction Technology to Watch in 2020. Available online: https://www.bigrentz.com/blog/construction-technology (accessed on 23 January 2021).
- Dalenogarea, L.S.; Beniteza, G.B.; Ayalab, N.F.; Franka, A.G. The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, 204, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mell, P.; Grance, T. The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing. Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology; Special Publication 800-145; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2011; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Böke, J.; Knaack, U.; Hemmerling, M. State-of-the-art of intelligent building envelopes in the context of intelligent technical systems. Intell. Build. Int. 2018, 11, 27–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saldivar, A.A.F.; Li, Y.; Chen, W.; Zhan, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chen, L.Y. Industry 4.0 with cyber-physical integration: A design and manufacture perspective. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC), Glasgow, UK, 11–12 September 2015; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Babiceanu, R.F.; Seker, R. Big Data and virtualization for manufacturing cyber physical systems: A survey of the current status and future outlook. Comput. Ind. 2016, 81, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Negri, E.; Fumagalli, L.; Macchi, M. A review of the roles of Digital Twin in CPS-based production systems. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 11, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calvetti, D.; Mêda, P.; Gonçalves, M.C.; Sousa, H. Worker 4.0: The Future of Sensored Construction Sites. Buildings 2020, 10, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alaloul, W.S.; Liew, M.S.; Zawawi, N.A.W.A.; Mohammed, B.S. Industry Revolution IR 4.0: Future Opportunities and Challenges in Construction Industry. MATEC Web Conf. 2018, 203, 02010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hermann, M.; Pentek, T.; Otto, B. Design principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. In Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2016; IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2016; pp. 3928–3937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bock, T. The future of construction automation: Technological disruption and the upcoming ubiquity of robotics. Autom. Constr. 2015, 59, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, B.; Razkenari, M.; Li, J.; Costin, A.; Kibert, C.; Qian, S.; Investigating, U.S. Industry Practitioners’ Perspectives towards the Adoption of Emerging Technologies in Industrialized Construction. Buildings 2020, 10, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maali, O.; Lines, B.; Smithwick, J.; Hurtado, K.; Sullivan, K. Change management practices for adopting new technologies in the design and construction industry. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2020, 25, 325–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merschbrock, C.; Munkvold, B.E. Effective digital collaboration in the construction industry–A case study of BIM deployment in a hospital construction project. Comput. Ind. 2015, 73, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Funtík, T.; Mayer, P.; Gašparík, J. The automation of the process of updating the curing time activity in 4D schedule. In Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and International AEC/FM Hackathon: The Future of Building Things, Berlin, Germany, 20–25 July 2018; pp. 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mozūriūnaitė, S.; Sabaitytė, J. To What Extent We Do Understand Smart Cities and Characteristics Influencing City Smartness. J. Arch. Urban 2021, 45, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, Y.H.; Kwak, Y.H.; Suk, S.J. Contractor’s Transformation Strategies for Adopting Building Information Modeling. J. Manag. Eng. 2016, 32, 05015005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Yu, J. Comparative Study of BIM Acceptance between Korea and the United States. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2015, 142, 05015016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sherratt, F. Editorial: The ethical and social challenges of Construction 4.0. Manag. Procure. Law 2020, 173, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Keywords | Number of Publications | ||
---|---|---|---|
Step 1 a | Step 2 b | Step 3 c | |
“Industry 4.0”; | 16,013 | 862 | 155 |
“Construction 4.0”; | 2399 | 59 | 19 |
“Industry 4.0 AND construction industry”; | 761 | 105 | 34 |
“BIM AND Construction 4.0; | 109 | 14 | 6 |
Building information modeling AND Construction 4.0” | 104 | 25 | 9 |
Sum | 19,386 | 1065 | 223 |
Total | 195 |
Industry 4.0. | Digital Technology | Construction 4.0 |
---|---|---|
Individual networks and devices that are connected together with security, analytics and management to help enhance manufacturing and industrial processes [23,24]. | Internet of Things and Services | Combination of sensors, other communication devices, cloud applications, business intelligence technology, that enable creation of virtual networks to support a smart factory environment [8,25]. |
Creation of physical objects through the overlaying layers using a digital plan [6,26]. | Additive manufacturing (3D printing) | Creation of 3D printing houses to decrease manpower requirements, reduce waste of materials and costs, increase housing affordability [11,27]. |
Correlation of large amount of data for handling, analyzing and processing [6,23,28]. | Big data | Solutions for managing, collecting and processing of huge amounts of data from BIM models, embedded sensors, machines, computers or people and to make them accessible to all project participants [8]. |
The interactions between user and a virtual environment in real-time to enhance the real-world experience through computer-generated simulation [6,23]. | Augmented Reality (AR)/Virtual Reality (VR)/Mixed Reality (MR) | A combination of real and virtual images to provide real-time user experience. Can be used for on-site inspection and defect detection, simulation for staff training and design review [11,27]. |
Robotics system used to replicate human actions and replace workers in manufacturing [23]. | Autonomous vehicle/robotics | Vehicles that automate and simplify repetitive or complex tasks on construction site; used to reduce labor cost; enable remote operations, increase efficiency and safety [11]. For example, electric trucks, delivery vans, robot swarms, humanoid robot capable of performing basic physical tasks such as installing drywall or reinforcement on bridges [27]. |
A flying device with automatic piloting, commonly known as a drone [23]. | Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) | Construction drones can monitor worksites for equipment malfunctions and security breaches, perform topographical mapping and dangerous tasks, and make hard-to-reach measurements [27]. |
Building information modeling (BIM) | Software tool that allows creating an intelligent object-oriented 3D model and generates smart workflows around it. Used for visualization of real-world objects, coordination among project actors, production of construction documents, saves rework time, cost, and error throughout the entire project life cycle [6,11,27]. | |
Computing model for providing convenient network access to a shared platform of customizable computing resources that can be easily accessed [29]. | Cloud computing | Provides virtual, low-cost access to information over the Internet, which is useful for cross-company collaboration on construction site [8,11]. |
Satellites in Earth’s orbit transmit precise signals to GPS receivers for calculating and displaying accurate location, speed, and time information to the user [23]. | GPS | Tracking technology that can be used for material management, storing and recalling, provide information for logistics purposes or equipment tracking [11]. |
LiDAR) / 3D Scanner | Light and range sensors that scan the surrounding jobsite and create high-resolution 3D images in real time [27]. | |
Wireless devices used for wireless communication and technology integration [23]. | Mobile devices (smart phones, tablet, handheld devices) | Devices for communication and data transmission assist with internet-based transactions through email or social media to improve productivity and safety management [11]. |
Creation of intelligent machines and systems that work, learn and react like humans [6,23]. | Artificial Intelligence | Intelligent system that can evaluate millions of pieces of data and generate or optimize them for better scheduling and cost options [6,27]. |
Modular and prefabricated construction | Production of building components off-site at the factory-like environment and transportation to the construction site for further assembly [8,27]. | |
New Materials | The development of new high-tech building materials, such as self-healing concrete, translucent wood, algae-infused building panels [27], to improve production productivity and protect the environment [6]. | |
Specific type of database that maintains distributed data using new authentication technology and encryption and network-wide consensus mechanism [23]. | Blockchain | |
Preventative methods for protecting cyber information from being attacked, compromised or stolen [23]. | Cyber security | |
Automation systems with embedded sensor technologies that use wireless communication between an object (or tag) and reading device to automatically track and identify such objects [23]. | RFID | Reader generates an electromagnetic field and activates the tags and then exchanges information with it. Technology can be used for tracking prefabricated components or equipment [7]. |
Engineered systems that are built on the synergy of computing and physical components [30]. | Cyber–physical systems | A bi-directional coordination between physical construction and virtual models [8]. |
Design systems, where synthesized models simulate the properties of the implemented model [28,31,32]. | Simulations of virtualmodels | Virtual and computerized analogue of a physical system that can be used for simulations for a variety of purposes, using real-time synchronization of incoming read data [23,33]. |
Automation systems with embedded sensors for capturing and monitoring data through gathering physical stimuli [23,28,31]. | Sensors and actuators | Devices for the evaluation of construction workers health, body velocity, gravitational and orientation forces, to perform remote environmental monitoring and predict hazardous situations [7,34]. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kozlovska, M.; Klosova, D.; Strukova, Z. Impact of Industry 4.0 Platform on the Formation of Construction 4.0 Concept: A Literature Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2683. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052683
Kozlovska M, Klosova D, Strukova Z. Impact of Industry 4.0 Platform on the Formation of Construction 4.0 Concept: A Literature Review. Sustainability. 2021; 13(5):2683. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052683
Chicago/Turabian StyleKozlovska, Maria, Daria Klosova, and Zuzana Strukova. 2021. "Impact of Industry 4.0 Platform on the Formation of Construction 4.0 Concept: A Literature Review" Sustainability 13, no. 5: 2683. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052683
APA StyleKozlovska, M., Klosova, D., & Strukova, Z. (2021). Impact of Industry 4.0 Platform on the Formation of Construction 4.0 Concept: A Literature Review. Sustainability, 13(5), 2683. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052683