Sustainable Management of Online to Offline Delivery Apps for Consumers’ Reuse Intention: Focused on the Meituan Apps
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theory and hypothesis
2.1. Theoretical Characteristics of the O2O Food Delivery Industry
2.2. Hypotheses on the O2O Food Delivery Industry Service Quality
2.3. Customer Satisfaction as a Mediation Role on the Reuse Intention
3. Data Collection and Research Methodology
3.1. Sources of Data Collection and Its Descriptive Statistics
3.2. Research Measurement
4. Empirical Analysis
4.1. Reliability Test
4.2. Validity Test
4.3. Structural Model Result and Its Implication
5. Concluding Remarks and Policy Implications
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Strongly Disagree→ Strongly Agree | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
1. Questions about Convenience | |||||
Q1: It is easy and simple to use Meituan app. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q2: Meituan app works well and without errors. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q3: Payment is faster and simpler when purchasing products from the Meituan app. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q4: Meituan app is easy to access at any time, any place. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2. Questions about safety | |||||
Q1: Meituan app is more reliable than other competitors with regard to security. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q2: Meituan app is trustful in system stability and security. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q3: I don’t need to worry about personal information leakage when using Meituan app. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q4: The Meituan app ID and password of the customers are safely protected. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q5: Meituan app cares about security more than other competitors do. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
3. Questions about economy | |||||
Q1: Meituan app provides diverse discount benefits such as coupons or promotion. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q2: When purchasing using Meituan app, I can save more money as compared with other competitors. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q3: When purchasing using the Meituan app, I can save more money as compared with the offline market. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q4: Meituan app is cost-effective. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
4. Questions about accuracy | |||||
Q1: Meituan app delivers food on time and to the exact location. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q2: Services and food delivered from Meituan are consistent with my expectation. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q3: There is no mistake or flaw in the food delivered by Meituan. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
5. Questions about speed | |||||
Q1: Meituan app delivers food on time or earlier. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q2: The waiting time of Meituan app is fine and acceptable as compared with its competitors. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q3: Except meal time, the waiting time of Meituan app could be reduced. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q4: The delivery speed of the Meituan app is faster than that of its competitors. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
6. Questions about satisfaction | |||||
Q1: I am satisfied with the use method of Meituan app. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q2: Using Meituan app services is convenient and satisfactory compared with offline services. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q3: I like Meituan app more than other competitors. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q4: I am satisfied with the service provided by Meituan app. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
7. Questions about reuse intention | |||||
Q1: I will keep using Meituan app from now on. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q2: I will recommend Meituan app to other people. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q3: I am willing to use other services offered by Meituan app if any. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q4: I will use Meituan app for three months. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
References
- Li, J.; Cao, S. Research on E-commerce Online to Offline Behavior Mechanism in Agricultural Products. 2015. Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1041&context=whiceb2015 (accessed on 23 March 2021).
- Moon, Y. The study of service quality model in O2O (Online-to-Offline) context. Manag. Inf. Syst. Rev. 2016, 35, 213–230. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y. Customers’ Choice between Online or Offline Channel about Search Products, Experience Products and Credence Products. Int. Bus. Res. 2016, 9, 38–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, Y.; Wang, Q.; Roh, T. Do information and service quality affect perceived privacy protection, satisfaction, and loyalty? Evidence from a Chinese O2O-based mobile shopping application. Telemat. Inform. 2020, 56, 101483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, S.; Kim, S. Does mIM experience affect satisfaction with and loyalty toward O2O services? Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 82, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.K.; Chou, H.W.; Hung, S.C. Interrelationships between behaviour intention and its influential factors for consumers of motorcycle express cargo delivery service. Transp. A Transp. Sci. 2019, 15, 526–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, V.; Zheng, N.; Shi, Y. Customers’ intention towards O2O food delivery service under the different characteristic of customer group–a case study of Suzhou Industrial Park. Int. J. Econ. Bus. Res. 2020, 19, 391–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, M.; Zhu, J. Research of O2O website based consumer purchase decision-making model. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 2019, 36, 371–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V.A.; Berry, L.L. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Mark. 1985, 49, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, M.; Bonn, M.A.; Li, J.J. Differences in perceptions about food delivery apps between single-person and multi-person households. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 77, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeong, Y.; Song, Y. A Study on the Factors Affecting the Intention to Use O2O Services. J. Inf. Technol. Serv. 2016, 15, 125–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Z.; Lee, J. A Study on the Effects of O2O Characteristics on Attractiveness, Trust and Users Intention: Focused on Food Service Industry between Korea and China. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business and Economics (ICBE2015), Seoul, Korea, 8–11 July 2015; pp. 119–122. [Google Scholar]
- Heo, J.W.; Kim, C.B. A Study on Factors Related to the Intention of Reuse by O2O Service Users in Large Retail Stores. Korean Bus. Educ. Rev. 2018, 33, 405–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P. The Self-Regulation of Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior. Soc. Psychol. Q. 1992, 55, 178–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armstrong, G.; Adam, S.; Denize, S.; Kotler, P. Principles of Marketing; Pearson Australia: Melbourne, Australia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Engel, J.F.; Blackwell, R.D.; Miniard, P.W. Consumer Behavior; Dryden Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Oliver, R.L. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 17, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, Y.; Sun, L. Reuse intention of third-party online payments: A focus on the sustainable factors of Alipay. Sustainability 2016, 8, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Möhlmann, M. Collaborative consumption: Determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. J. Consum. Behav. 2015, 14, 193–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgeson, F.V.; Petrescu, C. Do They All Perform Alike? An Examination of Perceived Performance, Citizen Satisfaction and Trust with US Federal Agencies. Int. Rev. Admin. Sci. 2011, 77, 451–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liao, Z.; Cheung, M.T. Internet-based e-shopping and consumer attitudes: An empirical study. Inf. Manag. 2001, 38, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Choi, Y.; Yu, Y. The influence of perceived corporate sustainability practices on employees and organizational performance. Sustainability 2014, 6, 348–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Campbell, D.T.; Fiske, D.W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull. 1959, 56, 81–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baron, R.M.; Kenny, D.A. The mediator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51, 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Lynch, J.G., Jr.; Chen, Q. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis. J. Consum. Res. 2010, 37, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Characteristics | Items | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 238 | 47.61% |
Female | 262 | 52.39% | |
Age | Under the age of 20 | 24 | 4.91% |
20–30 | 238 | 47.61% | |
30–40 | 107 | 21.42% | |
40–50 | 78 | 15.56% | |
Over 50 | 53 | 10.5% | |
Average monthly income (RMB: Chinese currency) | Less than 2000 RMB | 64 | 13.1% |
2000–5000 RMB | 243 | 48.57% | |
5000–8000 RMB | 130 | 25.91% | |
8000–10,000 RMB | 33 | 6.55% | |
More than 10,000 RMB | 29 | 5.87% | |
Family members | Living alone | 98 | 19.65% |
1 person | 36 | 7.09% | |
2 persons | 106 | 21.28% | |
3 persons | 122 | 24.29% | |
4 persons and more | 138 | 27.69% | |
Monthly average usage | 1–5 times | 247 | 49.39% |
6–10 times | 110 | 21.96% | |
11–15 times | 82 | 16.51% | |
16–20 times | 34 | 6.82% | |
More than 20 times | 27 | 5.32% | |
Monthly purchase amount (RMB) | Less than 50 RMB | 82 | 16.37% |
50–100 RMB | 141 | 28.24% | |
100–300 RMB | 156 | 31.11% | |
300–500 RMB | 82 | 16.37% | |
More than 500 RMB | 39 | 7.91% |
Index | Recommendable | Direct Model | Indirect Nodel |
---|---|---|---|
X2/df | ≤3 | 1.541 | 1.607 |
RMSEA | ≤0.05~0.08 | 0.033 | 0.035 |
GFI | ≥0.9 | 0.942 | 0.928 |
CFI | ≥0.9 | 0.953 | 0.941 |
IFI | ≥0.9 | 0.954 | 0.941 |
AGFI | ≥0.9 | 0.927 | 0.913 |
Variables | Number of Items | Cronbach’s α (>0.6) | Corrected Item: Total | Construct |
---|---|---|---|---|
Correlation (>0.5) | Reliability (>0.8) | |||
Convenience | 4 | 0.721 | 0.651–0.721 | 0.815 |
Safety | 5 | 0.704 | 0.632–0.710 | 0.804 |
Economy | 4 | 0.684 | 0.598–0.686 | 0.805 |
Accuracy | 3 | 0.713 | 0.644–0.708 | 0.828 |
Speed | 4 | 0.707 | 0.648–0.699 | 0.811 |
Customer Satisfaction | 4 | 0.721 | 0.654–0.738 | 0.824 |
Reuse Intention | 4 | 0.753 | 0.698–0.738 | 0.863 |
Potential Variable | Items | SFL (Standardized Factor Loadings) | CR (Critical Ratio) | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|
Convenience (Conv.) | Conv4 | 0.603 | - | 0.595 |
Conv 3 | 0.603 | 7.420 | ||
Conv 2 | 0.685 | 8.027 | ||
Conv 1 | 0.682 | 8.004 | ||
Safety (Safety) | Safety5 | 0.607 | 9.162 | 0.612 |
Safety4 | 0.704 | - | ||
Safety3 | 0.651 | 9.788 | ||
Safety2 | 0.635 | 9.557 | ||
Safety1 | 0.656 | 9.850 | ||
Economic (Economy) | Economy4 | 0.732 | - | 0.690 |
Economy3 | 0.762 | 11.514 | ||
Economy2 | 0.774 | 11.655 | ||
Economy1 | 0.675 | 10.370 | ||
Accuracy (Accuracy) | Accuracy3 | 0.756 | 10.384 | 0.680 |
Accuracy2 | 0.688 | 9.703 | ||
Accuracy1 | 0.670 | - | ||
Speed (Speed) | Speed4 | 0.673 | - | 0.648 |
Speed3 | 0.671 | 9.486 | ||
Speed2 | 0.678 | 9.557 | ||
Speed1 | 0.655 | 9.298 | ||
Customer Satisfaction (Satisfaction) | Satisfaction4 | 0.699 | - | 0.669 |
Satisfaction3 | 0.690 | 9.160 | ||
Satisfaction2 | 0.657 | 8.862 | ||
Satisfaction1 | 0.732 | 9.509 | ||
Reuse Intention (Re_use) | Re_use4 | 0.719 | - | 0.685 |
Re_use3 | 0.677 | 10.555 | ||
Re_use2 | 0.727 | 12.474 | ||
Re_use1 | 0.724 | 12.445 |
Construct Items | Convenience | Safety | Economic | Accuracy | Speed | Customer Satisfaction | Reuse Intention |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Convenience | 0.771 | ||||||
Safety | 0.710 | 0.782 | |||||
Economic | 0.506 | 0.730 | 0.831 | ||||
Accuracy | 0.522 | 0.769 | 0.637 | 0.825 | |||
Speed | 0.476 | 0.641 | 0.649 | 0.726 | 0.805 | ||
Customer Satisfaction | 0.621 | 0.697 | 0.734 | 0.598 | 0.789 | 0.818 | |
Reuse Intention | 0.506 | 0.628 | 0.692 | 0.493 | 0.720 | 0.778 | 0.828 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Choi, Y.; Zhang, L.; Debbarma, J.; Lee, H. Sustainable Management of Online to Offline Delivery Apps for Consumers’ Reuse Intention: Focused on the Meituan Apps. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073593
Choi Y, Zhang L, Debbarma J, Lee H. Sustainable Management of Online to Offline Delivery Apps for Consumers’ Reuse Intention: Focused on the Meituan Apps. Sustainability. 2021; 13(7):3593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073593
Chicago/Turabian StyleChoi, Yongrok, Lige Zhang, Jahira Debbarma, and Hyoungsuk Lee. 2021. "Sustainable Management of Online to Offline Delivery Apps for Consumers’ Reuse Intention: Focused on the Meituan Apps" Sustainability 13, no. 7: 3593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073593
APA StyleChoi, Y., Zhang, L., Debbarma, J., & Lee, H. (2021). Sustainable Management of Online to Offline Delivery Apps for Consumers’ Reuse Intention: Focused on the Meituan Apps. Sustainability, 13(7), 3593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073593