Korean Maritime Cadets’ Onboard Training Environment Survey
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Korean Maritime Cadets
3.1.1. Descriptive Statistics
3.1.2. Onboard Training Environment
3.1.3. Cadet’s Views on the Onboard Training Environment
3.2. Shipping Companies
3.2.1. Descriptive Statistics
3.2.2. Company’s Views on Cadets and Onboard Training
4. Discussion
4.1. Living Environment
4.2. Personal Safety
4.3. Human Rights
4.4. Views on Cadets and Onboard Training
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- Evaluate whether the ship’s environment is suitable for training, and only allow cadets to train on the ship if the environment is suitable.
- (2)
- Constantly monitor whether the onboard training guidelines are actually well maintained in the field.
- (3)
- Strengthen the preventive education of the crew on ships where cadets are present regarding assault, verbal abuse, overuse of power, and sexual harassment.
- (4)
- Increase efforts continuously not only to physically improve the onboard training environment but to systematically manage cadets as students.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- UNCTAD. Review of Maritime Transport 2019. Available online: https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/books/9789210043021 (accessed on 3 November 2020). [CrossRef]
- Roberts, S.E.; Nielsen, D.; Kotłowski, A.; Jaremin, B. Fatal accidents and injuries among merchant seafarers worldwide. Occup. Med. (Chic. Ill.) 2014, 64, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Saunders, R. Assessment of professional development for teachers in the vocational education and training sector: An examination of the Concerns Based Adoption Model. Aust. J. Educ. 2012, 56, 182–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, B.-G.; Kim, H.-R.; Lim, M.-H. Method on the effective onboard training and guidance for apprentice engineer officers in the training ship—The case of Mokpo National Maritime University. J. Korean Soc. Mar. Environ. Saf. 2012, 18, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sin, H.S.; Im, M.H.; Lee, C.H. A basic study on the stress of on-board training for cadet in shipping company. J. Fishries Mar. Sci. Educ. 2018, 30, 2231–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doo, H.W.; Jeon, Y.W.; Lim, C.H.; Jin, H.H. Study on improvements in management regime and legal statute of cadet. Marit. Law Rev. 2018, 30, 229–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yıldız, S.; Ugurlu, Ö.; Yüksekyıldız, E. Occupational issues and expectations of Turkish deck cadets. Trans. Nav. Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. 2016, 10, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, S.-I.; Yoo, J.-H.; Choi, J.-H. Constitutional legitimacy of the maritime cadet training system. J. Korean Soc. Mar. Environ. Saf. 2016, 22, 430–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, M.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, P.; Wu, J.; Pike, K.; Broadhurst, E. Chinese women seafarers: A case study of the women cadets in Shanghai. Mar. Policy 2017, 83, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Status of National Port Volume Processing. Available online: http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1265 (accessed on 16 November 2019).
- Seafarer Employment Status. Available online: http://kosis.kr/search/search.do (accessed on 22 November 2019).
- McLaughlin, H. Seafarers in the spotlight. Marit. Policy Manag. 2015, 42, 95–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Explanatory Data. Available online: https://www.mof.go.kr/article/view.do?menuKey=972&boardKey=11&articleKey=30364 (accessed on 31 January 2021).
- Sevilla, G.S.; Arceno, R.A. Structured shipboard training program and performance of maritime cadets. Int. J. Engl. Lit. Soc. Sci. 2017, 2, 90–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sin, H.S.; Im, M.H. A basic study on the satisfaction of on-board training for cadets in shipping company. J. Fish. Mar. Sci. Educ. 2015, 27, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thomas, M.A. Sexual harassment in a residential occupation: The experiences of women seafarers. Health Educ. J. 2006, 65, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stannard, S.; Vaughan, C.; Swift, O.; Robinson, G.; Altaf, S.A.; McGarry, A. Women seafarers’ health and welfare survey. Int. Marit. Health 2015, 66, 123–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mellbye, A.; Carter, T. Seafarers’ depression and suicide. Int. Marit. Health 2017, 68, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sampson, H.; Ellis, N. Seafarer’s Mental Health and Wellbeing; IOSH: Wigston, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Sampson, H.; Tang, L. Strange things happen at sea: Training and new technology in a multi-billion global industry. J. Educ. Work. 2016, 29, 980–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Muola, J.M. A study of the relationship between academic achievement motivation and home environment among standard eight pupils. Educ. Res. Rev. 2010, 5, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhtar, M.J.; Utne, I.B. Human fatigue’s effect on the risk of maritime groundings—A Bayesian Network modeling approach. Saf. Sci. 2014, 62, 427–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jepsen, J.R.; Zhao, Z.; van Leeuwen, W.M.A. Seafarer fatigue: A review of risk factors, consequences for seafarers’ health and safety and options for mitigation. Int. Marit. Health 2015, 66, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wadsworth, E.J.K.; Allen, P.H.; McNamara, R.L.; Smith, A.P. Fatigue and health in a seafaring population. Occup. Med. (Chic. Ill.) 2008, 58, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lützhöft, M.; Grech, M.R.; Porathe, T. Information environment, fatigue, and culture in the maritime domain. Rev. Hum. Factors Ergon. 2011, 7, 280–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Operation Guidelines for Onboard Training. Available online: https://www.law.go.kr/admRulSc.do?menuId=5&subMenuId=41&tabMenuId=183&query=승선실습#AJAX (accessed on 30 January 2021).
Gender | n (%) | Department | n (%) | Period of First Apprenticeship | n (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male | 228 (80.3) | Navigation | 200 (70.4) | Less than 1 month | 22 (7.7) |
Female | 38 (13.4) | Engine | 84 (29.6) | More than 1 month and less than 3 months | 25 (8.8) |
Prefer not to say | 18 (6.3) | More than 3 months and less than 5 months | 59 (20.8) | ||
More than 5 months and less than 7 months | 165 (58.1) | ||||
More than 7 months and less than 9 months | 6 (2.1) | ||||
More than 9 months and less than 12 months | 7 (2.5) |
Vessel Type | n (%) | Gross Tonnage | n (%) | Crew’s Nationality | n (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bulk carrier | 39 (13.7) | Under 2999 | 4 (1.4) | All Korean seafarers | 83 (29.2) |
Chemical carrier | 28 (9.9) | 3000–9999 | 42 (14.8) | All foreign seafarers | 3 (1.1) |
LNG/LPG carrier | 63 (22.2) | 10,000–29,999 | 55 (19.4) | Mixed (Korean officers and foreign crew) | 173 (60.9) |
Car carrier | 40 (14.1) | 30,000–49,999 | 45 (15.8) | Mixed (multinational officers and multinational crew) | 24 (8.5) |
Container ship | 44 (15.5) | 50,000–99,999 | 74 (26.1) | Other(prefer not to say) | 1 (0.4) |
Passenger ship | 3 (1.1) | Over 100,000 | 64 (22.5) | ||
Training ship (university/institute) | 46 (16.2) | ||||
Other (oil tanker, prefer not to say) | 21 (7.4) |
Private Cabin (n = 272) | Shared Cabin (n = 12) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | Yes | No | |
Refrigerator | 210 (77.2%) | 62 (22.8%) | 3 (25.0%) | 9 (75.0) |
TV | 46 (16.9%) | 226 (83.1%) | 2 (16.7%) | 10 (83.3%) |
Internet | 186 (68.4%) | 86 (31.6%) | 5 (41.7%) | 7 (58.3% |
Shower | 254 (93.4%) | 18 (6.6%) | 4 (33.3%) | 8 (66.7%) |
Toilet | 256 (94.1%) | 16 (5.9%) | 4 (33.3%) | 8 (66.7%) |
Desk and chair | 268 (98.5%) | 4 (1.5%) | 8 (66.7%) | 4 (33.3%) |
Table and sofa | 240 (88.2%) | 32 (11.8%) | 5 (41.7%) | 7 (58.3%) |
Experience of Sexual Harassment | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | Total | ||
Gender (Percentage within each group) | Male | 21 (9.2) | 207 (90.8) | 228 |
Female | 11 (28.9) | 27 (71.1) | 38 | |
Prefer not to say | 6 (33.3) | 12 (66.7) | 18 | |
Total | 38 | 246 | 284 |
Frequency | n (%) | Place | n (%) | Perpetrator | n (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 time | 11 (28.9) | Bridge | 18 (47.4) | Captain/chief engineer | 14 (36.8) |
2–3 times | 10 (26.3) | Engine room | 7 (18.4) | First mate/engineer | 10 (26.3) |
4–9 times | 9 (23.7) | Dining area | 2 (5.3) | Second/third mate/engineer | 6 (15.8) |
10 times or more | 8 (21.1) | Individual cabin | 7 (18.4) | Crew | 3 (7.9) |
Other | 4 (10.5) | Other | 5 (13.2) |
Problems with Onboard Training | n (%) | Positive Aspects of Onboard Training | n (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Unreasonable working hours and conditions | 48 (16.9) | Practicing the knowledge learned at university | 117 (41.2) |
Being isolated from social and family life | 47 (16.5) | Experiencing the working culture on a ship | 94 (33.1) |
Unhelpful attitudes of superiors | 44 (15.5) | Visiting various countries | 19 (6.7) |
Unsystematic onboard training (poor education, insufficient training and experience) | 43 (15.1) | Cultivating sociality by working with various people | 18 (6.3) |
Homesickness | 25 (8.8) | Improving cultural understanding through work with foreign seafarers | 14 (4.9) |
Long training period | 22 (7.7) | Promoting pride in being seafarers | 11 (3.9) |
Being unauthorized for a given task | 18 (6.3) | Other | 11 (3.9) |
Dangerous and difficult tasks | 11 (3.9) | ||
Other | 26 (9.2) |
Welfare | n (%) | Rights | n (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Sufficient rest time | 133 (46.8) | Improving the legal system relating to cadets | 102 (35.9) |
Communication with the outside (Internet, SNS, etc.) | 39 (13.7) | Strengthening the supervision of the ship company at the government level | 52 (18.3) |
Systematic onboard training program | 38 (13.4) | Expansion of cadet rights protection education | 46 (16.2) |
Rational onboard training monetary allowance | 23 (8.1) | Reinforcement of corporate social responsibility and ethics management system | 30 (10.6) |
Better food | 19 (6.7) | Introduction of a mentoring system | 29 (10.2) |
Individual cabin | 11 (3.9) | Expending training on university/institute training ships | 19 (6.7) |
Recreational facilities (games, sports, etc.) | 4 (1.4) | Other | 6 (2.1) |
Other | 17 (6) |
Specification | n (%) | |
---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 40 (97.6) |
Female | - | |
Prefer not to say | 1 (2.4) | |
Age | 20~29 | 5 (12.2) |
30~39 | 16 (39.0) | |
40~49 | 18 (43.9) | |
50~59 | 2 (4.9) | |
Department | Navigation | 15 (36.6) |
Engine | 12 (29.3) | |
Human resources | 9 (22.0) | |
Marketing | 3 (7.3) | |
Other | 2 (4.9) | |
Work experience in the maritime industry | Less than 5 years | 3 (7.3) |
More than 5 years, less than 10 years | 10 (24.4) | |
More than 10 years, less than 15 years | 10 (24.4) | |
More than 15 years, less than 20 years | 15 (36.6) | |
More than 20 years | 3 (7.3) | |
Size of the company’s fleet | Less than 30 | 12 (29.3) |
30~49 | 10 (24.4) | |
50~69 | 8 (19.5) | |
70~99 | 8 (19.5) | |
More than 100 | 1 (2.4) | |
Do not know | 2 (4.9) |
Definition of Cadets | n (%) | Company’s Expectation of Cadets | n (%) |
---|---|---|---|
A candidate officer | 20 (48.8) | Eager to learn | 17 (41.5) |
A student | 17 (41.5) | Hardworking | 1 (2.4) |
A crew member | 1 (2.4) | Take responsibility for their job | 9 (22) |
A temporary worker | 1 (2.4) | Sufficient knowledge of their area | 8 (19.5) |
Other | 2 (4.9) | Ability to get along with others | 3 (7.3) |
Other | 3 (7.3) |
Difficulty of Cadet Management | n (%) | Important Factors for Effective Onboard Training | n (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Adjustment of the period of boarding | 2 (4.9) | Strengthening job-related education | 21 (51.2) |
Costs for onboard training | 4 (9.8) | Strengthening safety education | 7 (17.1) |
Safety issues | 22 (53.7) | Expanding training on university/institute training ships | 3 (7.3) |
Relationship problems between cadets and crew | 8 (19.5) | Expansion of onboard training period | 1 (2.4) |
Other | 5 (12.2) | Government level support for onboard training costs | 2 (4.9) |
Strengthening leadership/seamanship training | 4 (9.8) | ||
Helping to form good human relationships with crew | 3 (7.3) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lee, J.; Dhesi, S.; Phillips, I.; Jeong, M.; Lee, C. Korean Maritime Cadets’ Onboard Training Environment Survey. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4161. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084161
Lee J, Dhesi S, Phillips I, Jeong M, Lee C. Korean Maritime Cadets’ Onboard Training Environment Survey. Sustainability. 2021; 13(8):4161. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084161
Chicago/Turabian StyleLee, Jinwoo, Surindar Dhesi, Ian Phillips, Moonsoo Jeong, and Changhee Lee. 2021. "Korean Maritime Cadets’ Onboard Training Environment Survey" Sustainability 13, no. 8: 4161. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084161
APA StyleLee, J., Dhesi, S., Phillips, I., Jeong, M., & Lee, C. (2021). Korean Maritime Cadets’ Onboard Training Environment Survey. Sustainability, 13(8), 4161. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084161