Next Article in Journal
Perception of Self-Efficacy and Health-Related Behavior in Context of Taekwon-Do Sport Camps
Previous Article in Journal
Food Loss–Food Waste–Food Security: A New Research Agenda
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Analysis of Infusions with the Addition P. padus Bark: Assessment of the Antioxidant Potential and Their Inhibitory Effect on Enzymes Associated with Oxidative Stress
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/su13094644
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thiamine in Lipid Systems vs. the Antioxidant Activity of Epigallocatechin Gallate and Caffeine

by
Justyna Piechocka
and
Krystyna Szymandera-Buszka
*
Department of Gastronomy Science and Functional Foods, Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 31, 61-624 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(9), 4644; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094644
Submission received: 23 March 2021 / Revised: 19 April 2021 / Accepted: 19 April 2021 / Published: 22 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Food as a Way to Provide Beneficial Nutrients)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aim of this study was to determine correlations between the concentration of thiamine hydrochloride or thiamine pyrophosphate and the antioxidant activity of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and caffeine, as well as thiamine stability. The study was conducted in model systems. Oxidation degree indices of soybean oil (peroxide value and anisidine value LAN) and concentrations of total thiamine were determined. To compare the dynamics of the changes in thiamine content during storage, half-life T1/2 was determined. There was a strong correlation between the stability of thiamine and the stability of the oil. Thiamine was particularly sensitive to secondary oxidation products. Higher losses of thiamine introduced in the form of thiamine pyrophosphate were found (4–6%). The addition of tea components increased fat stability and thus reduced thiamine losses. The dynamics of thiamine loss were found to be lower with EGCG than caffeine. The antioxidant activity of these components was significantly reduced when the content of thiamine (1.0–20.0 mg/100 g) was higher than the natural level in foods. In order to maintain thiamine stability and the high activity of the active tea ingredients, it is necessary to consider their simultaneous addition to the systems in concentrations that limit their interactions.

1. Introduction

Thiamine (vitamin B1) is a water soluble vitamin, occurring both in free form and in bound form as phosphate esters: thiamine monophosphate (TMP), thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP), and thiamine triphosphate (TDP) [1,2]. After absorption, it undergoes phosphorylation to TPP and participates in cellular enzymatic processes associated with carbohydrate, lipid, and branched amino acid metabolisms. Thiamine, in addition to its crucial role in energy metabolism, is also known for its catalytic activity in hexose-monophosphate pathways [3]. Studies further confirm the influence of thiamine on the immune system [3,4]. Thiamine depletion decreases naive B cells without affecting IgA+ plasma cells via the impairing of tricarboxylic acid cycle activity and finally impairs the initiation of antigen-specific antibody responses [5,6].
Studies show that thiamine therapy should be a crucial part of treatment plans and health policies to prevent the development or progression of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease [7,8].
Thiamine is widely distributed in plant and animal products. This vitamin is found in high concentrations in yeast, cereal products (especially whole wheat), legume seeds (especially fermented), and meat (especially pork). Small amounts of thiamine can also be synthesized by intestinal microorganisms [9]. Unfortunately, thiamine is one of the most labile vitamins [4,10,11,12,13,14]. Analyses of cooked meals has shown a 50% loss of thiamine on average. This instability of thiamine was confirmed by previous studies related to both high temperature processing and storage [15,16]. Therefore, globally, many populations may be exposed to clinical or subclinical deficiencies of this vitamin. Clinical symptoms develop within the following three weeks of a deficient thiamine intake [17,18].
Frequent deficiencies of this vitamin can be caused by its inadequate dietary intake. This may result from the intake of small portions of food, as well as the consumption of highly processed products [4,12,19]. For a group of consumers who exclude or avoid certain categories of food, supplementation may be an alternative source of many nutrients.
Very high doses of thiamine, i.e., up to 3 g/day, are used in the treatment of numerous diseases [20,21,22]. Food fortification may constitute an attractive source of many nutrients, including thiamine. However, it may also be possible that the introduction of increased levels of thiamine could have detrimental consequences to the stability of other components [23,24].
Other studies also indicate that functional foods with tea extracts are taken into consideration as elements that may potentially aid the treatment of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease [25,26,27]. Moreover, EGCG therapy may be helpful in treating the parenchymal and vascular symptoms of amyloidosis [28]. Antioxidants are interesting compounds for scientists because of their anti-ageing and anti-inflammatory properties [22,29]. Researchers also indicate the importance of antioxidants for the physiological functions of the liver, the kidneys, the digestive system, and the prevention of cardiovascular diseases and cancer [7,25,26,27].
Results of earlier studies indicate that phenolic compounds from natural antioxidants, especially rosemary and tea, show strong antioxidant activities both in lipid systems and food [30,31,32,33,34,35]. It was found that mixing oils, e.g., soybean oil, with different concentrations of green tea extract led to an increase in its stability against oxidation [36,37].
Tea leaves at various degree of fermentation (oxidation) have been proved to have health-promoting properties, as they significantly reduce the risk of various diseases, including cardiovascular diseases [37,38]. Tea extracts have significant anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, anticarcinogenic, antihypertensive, neuroprotective, cholesterol-lowering, and thermogenic properties [39]. Some studies suggest that tea and its bioactive polyphenolic components have numerous health-beneficial effects, including the prevention of various diseases such as diabetes, arthritis, stroke, and obesity [40,41,42].
Our preliminary studies [43,44] have shown that the addition of tea extracts has increased the oxidative stability of fat and thus has reduced the loss of thiamine. This analysis has shown the greatest protective effect of white and green tea extracts, which has strongly correlated with the highest antioxidant efficiency. Moreover, the earlier data suggest that the presence of thiamine may influence the antioxidant activity of tea extracts with varying degrees of fermentation [5,6]. However, there is no data in scientific publications that would prove which types of bioactive components of tea are more active towards thiamine. The high antioxidant efficiency of EGCG was found, but there is no data on the stability of thiamine in the presence of this component. Moreover, there is no data on the activity of thiamine toward these active tea components.
Therefore, the assumed null hypothesis (H0) was that the concentration of thiamine and antioxidant activity of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and caffeine are related to each other, at p > 0.05. In case the null hypothesis was rejected, an alternative hypothesis (H1) was assumed, according to which there are no correlations between the aforementioned variables.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation

Thiamine hydrochloride and thiamine pyrophosphate (Merck) were assumed as thiamine models. The study was conducted in model systems, where soybean oil (Flota Logistic Sp. z o.o. Tychy, Poland) systems with active tea components (PhytoLab GmbH & Co. KG; Vestenbergsgreuth, Germany) and thiamine hydrochloride or thiamine pyrophosphate were adopted in weight. Active tea components—(-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) (99.54%) and caffeine (99.94%)—were added at the following amounts: 0.04, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, and 6.0 mg/100 g of oil. Thiamine at different concentrations was added to soybean oil with EGCG or caffeine. Thiamine was added at the following amounts: 0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 (0.01–0.8 mg/100 g—the natural thiamine level in food products) as well as 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 9.0, 13.5, 16.0, 18.0, and 20.0 mg/100 g (1.0–20.0 mg/100 g—enriched products).
The samples were stored at 30 ± 1 °C, without access to light. In order to obtain a uniform weight, 20 g samples with a 1.3–1.5 cm thick layer were mixed continuously. They were stored, and the degree of soybean oil oxidation was measured on Days 0, 5, 7, 11, 15, 17, 21, 25, 28, and 31.

2.2. Methods

On the established days, soybean oil oxidation degree indices were determined: peroxide value and anisidine value LAN.

2.2.1. Peroxide Value

Peroxide value [45,46] was based on the quantitative determination of the iodine that was released from potassium iodide under the influence of active oxygen from peroxides in fat. The peroxide value was expressed in milliequivalents (meq) of active oxygen per kilogram of oil.

2.2.2. Anisidine Value

The determination of the anisidine value (mEq/kg) [47] was based on the spectrophotometric determination of the yellow complex concentration formed as a result of the reaction of secondary fat oxidation products with the p-anisidine solution. The absorbance was measured at 350 nm, both before and after reaction.
Based on the indicators of lipid oxidation, the protection factor (Wo) was calculated. This was the ratio between the time necessary for a particular sample to reach the peroxide value 50 (meq02/kg) and the corresponding time for the control sample. Wo > 1 indicates the antioxidant properties of the additive, whereas Wo > 1 indicates the pro-oxidative properties of the additive [48].
In order to compare the influence of elevated amounts of thiamine on the antioxidative properties of EGCG and caffeine, the differences between the protection coefficient of the component and that of a sample without thiamine, as well as that of a sample with thiamine added at an amount of 2.0 mg/100 g of oil, were calculated. A greater difference indicated the higher ‘vulnerability’ of the extract to the high doses of thiamine hydrochloride.

2.2.3. Thiamine Stability

On the set days of storage, the samples with oil, thiamine, and active tea components (EGCG or caffeine) were determined using the thiochromium method [49,50], which included an analysis of quantitative changes in the free (thiamine hydrochloride) and bound (thiamine pyrophosphate) forms.
A Jenway model 6200 fluorometer (Jenway, Stone, UK) (an input filter with a maximum of 365 nm and an output filter with a maximum of 435 nm) was used for the measurement of thiochromium fluorescence. All determinations were made in duplicate.

2.2.4. Statistical Analysis

The obtained results were subject to statistical analysis using STATISTICATM PL 13 (StatSoft) software. In order to determine the strength of the correlation between the variables, Pearson’s linear correlation coefficients (r) were calculated (r) [51]. The data analyzed were from two independent samples, and seven measurements for each sample were taken; n = 14. The comparison of the dynamics of changes in thiamine content during the storage was conducted by linear regression analysis of the values obtained experimentally. Half-life T1/2 was determined, i.e., the time within which the initial thiamine content decreased by half [9]. The accuracy of the models was estimated using the coefficient of determination (R2) and the root mean square error (RMSE). The significance level for all analyses was set at 5%.

3. Results

3.1. Antioxidative Effect of EGCG and Caffeine in the Presence of Thiamine Hydrochloride and Thiamine Pyrophosphate

The analysis showed that the higher the concentration of EGCG and caffeine was, the higher the antioxidant activity. The lowest oil oxidation indices (Tables S1–S12) were found at concentrations of 4.0 and 6.0 mg/100 g of EGCG and caffeine. Moreover, for these concentrations, indexes of the protection factor Wo (Figure 1) were the highest. It was found that the samples with EGCG exhibited a higher antioxidant activity, whereas a lower activity was observed in the samples with caffeine. There was also a significant correlation between the amount of thiamine hydrochloride or thiamine pyrophosphate in the system and the oxidative stability of soybean oil in the presence of the tea components under analysis, especially EGCG (Table 1 and Tables S1–S12, Figure 1). However, the size and the direction of these relationships depended on the concentration level of both the hydrochloride thiamine and pyrophosphate thiamine. The lipid oxidation indicators did not increase in the systems whose thiamine content corresponded to a low level in food products (0.01–0.1 mg/100 g). Meanwhile, in the samples containing thiamine hydrochloride or thiamine pyrophosphate at amounts from 0.1 to 1.0 mg/100 g, the oil oxidation indices even decreased. The protection factors (Wo) for these samples were the highest.
In the samples containing thiamine at concentration ranges of enriched products (above 1.0–20.0 mg/100 g), there was a statistically significant positive correlation between the indicators of primary (peroxide value) and secondary (anisidine value) oxidation products of soybean oil systems with the addition of EGCG or caffeine. A high correlation coefficient indicates a stronger correlation between the increased content of thiamine hydrochloride and thiamine pyrophosphate (over 1.0 mg/100 g) in the system and the reduced antioxidant activity of both EGCG and caffeine (Table 1). The addition of thiamine, at amounts above 1.0 and 20.0 mg/100 g, diminished the protection factor Wo (Figure 1, Tables S1–S12), defined as the time necessary for a particular sample to reach the peroxide value 50 (meq02/kg). For example, the analysis, for samples with thiamine concentrations of 0.1 mg/100 g, showed a protection factor on the highest level, while solutions containing the most thiamine (20 mg/100 g) showed a decrease in the protection factor on the lowest level (16–34%). A table containing all the remaining thiamine concentration data is included in the Supplementary Material Tables S1–S12. There was a decrease in the protection factor (Wo) observed for both EGCG and caffeine at these concentrations. The highest decrease in the protection factor was noted at a thiamine concentration of 20 mg/100 g and an EGCG or caffeine concentration of 4 mg/100 g. However, a significant decrease in the protection factor was noted at a thiamine concentration above 6 mg/100 g. It was found that the antioxidant activity of both EGCG and caffeine was also more vulnerable to thiamine pyrophosphate than thiamine hydrochloride. For example, the analysis, for samples with EGCG at 4 mg/100 g and a thiamine concentration of 20 mg/100 g, showed a decrease in the protection factor on the level of 46% in the presence of thiamine hydrochloride, and on the level of 49% in the presence of thiamine pyrophosphate.
A lower correlation was found for samples with the addition of both EGCG and caffeine, especially at higher concentrations. The analysis showed that the higher the concentration of EGCG and caffeine was (above 5.0 mg/100 g), the lower the decrease was in the protection factor of both EGCG and caffeine in the presence of a high concentration of thiamine.

3.2. Thiamine Stability

The total thiamine content in the samples was also measured. A considerable loss of thiamine was observed after 31 days of storage (Table 2 and Table 3; Figure 2). It was found that the thiamine losses, among 31 days storage, followed a simple linear regression model (R2 = 0.99–0.96) (Table 2 and Table 3). There was a considerable loss of thiamine—from 10 to more than 21% for thiamine hydrochloride, and from 12 to more than 28% for thiamine pyrophosphate (Figure 2). It was found that the stability of thiamine depended on the forms of thiamine. A lower stability of thiamine was confirmed in the samples with thiamine pyrophosphate, regardless of the changing storage conditions. The analysis of all predictors’ influence on thiamine changes (Table 2 and Table 3) revealed that the type of active component and the initial thiamine and active component content significantly affected the loss of thiamine.
The analysis of the dynamics of changes in values of thiamine hydrochloride and thiamine pyrophosphate content (Table 2 and Table 3) showed the highest dynamics of thiamine loss with oil and without additions of active components (EGCG or caffeine). The highest losses of thiamine, both thiamine hydrochloride and thiamine pyrophosphate, with higher thiamine concentrations—exceeding 8 mg/100 g—were found.
The analysis of thiamine stability in model oil systems containing tea ingredients showed the protective effect of both EGCG and caffeine. However, the protective effect of EGCG toward thiamine was found to be higher than in the case of caffeine. It was found that the half-life T1/2 of thiamine values showed lower dynamics of thiamine loss with EGCG than caffeine. The thiamine half-lives T(1/2) in the presence of caffeine were up to 20% times shorter than they were in the presence of EGCG.
The losses of thiamine with EGCG were situated in the range of 10–20% and with caffeine of 12–23%.
There was a strong negative correlation between the stability of thiamine and the instability of oil (Table 4). The analysis showed that the higher the value of fat oxidation was, the higher the losses of thiamine were. Thiamine was particularly sensitive to secondary oxidation products (Table 4).
The addition of EGCG or caffeine increased fat stability and thus reduced thiamine losses. However, this depended on the type of the tea component and its concentration. It was found that the greatest protective effect was achieved with EGCG.
The best results for thiamine hydrochloride stability (between 80% and 90%) in the presence of EGCG were observed in the concentration regions of 0.04–3 mg thiamine/100 g and 3.0–4.0 mg EGCG/100g. Moreover, the half-life T1/2 of thiamine values showed lower dynamics of thiamine loss for these concentrations of EGCG. The thiamine content in these systems containing thiamine hydrochloride and EGCG below 4 mg/100 g was strongly correlated with the highest antioxidant activity of EGCG. However, this correlation was already lower in systems with EGCG concentration exceeding 4 mg/100 g. In these samples, the oxidative activity of EGCG was the highest, but the losses of thiamine were also higher.
The statistical analysis (T1/2) of thiamine hydrochloride in the presence of caffeine showed also a lower thiamine loss than that of the samples without the addition of active components. A protective effect of caffeine toward thiamine was also found, although this effect was lower than that of EGCG. However, the size and the direction of these relationships depended also on the concentration level of caffeine. The thiamine content in the systems containing thiamine hydrochloride and caffeine was less correlated with the antioxidant activity of caffeine than EGCG was (Table 4). Only at low concentrations of caffeine (to 2.0 mg/100 g) was a stronger correlation with thiamine stability and with antioxidant activity found. The lowest correlation for thiamine hydrochloride stability and antioxidant activity of caffeine was observed at concentrations exceeding 4 mg/100 g. In these samples, the losses of thiamine were high, despite the antioxidative activity of caffeine.

4. Discussion

The results of our study are consistent with the findings of earlier research on the antioxidant activity of tea components [35,44,52,53]. The antioxidant activity of green, oolong, and white tea has been shown [44,54,55,56]. It has also been found that caffeine is an antioxidant capable of preventing lipid peroxidation [57,58]. Other research has confirmed the relationship between the oxidative stability of sunflower oil and the caffeine content and antioxidant activities [59]. Previous studies have also shown that the peroxide anion binding efficiency of tea extracts decreased in the following order: oolong tea > green tea > black tea [60,61,62,63]. Our present studies confirmed higher antioxidant activities for EGCG than caffeine. Previous research has also revealed that the antioxidant activity of black tea is slower than that of all the others, and the high antioxidant activity of green teas has been correlated with a high EGCG concentration [64]. It has been confirmed that epigallocatechin gallate is the dominant antioxidant compound in the tea extracts [65,66,67,68].
Our research confirmed a reduction in the antioxidant activity of EGCG and caffeine in the samples containing thiamine at high concentrations (above 8.0 mg/100 g). Moreover, earlier studies have shown the highest correlation coefficient between the high concentration of thiamine and the decrease of the antioxidant activity of green and white tea extract [43,44,48,69]. This may be due to the fact that that the antioxidant efficacy of catechins, including EGCG, depends not only on the chemical structure but also on the environmental conditions [70]. Studies show that catechins achieve the highest stability at a pH ranging between 4 and 6 [34]. Reactions such as oxidation and/or polymerization, even for a pH above 6.0, have been observed in other research [71].
Previous research has confirmed that green tea polyphenols accelerate pro-oxidant reactions depending on experimental conditions. The differences between those studies may be associated with the pH of the solutions and the concentrations of thiamine. Other studies found that the pH ranged from 5.36 to 6.96 due to the range of thiamine concentrations studied: 1 and 27 mg/mL, respectively [70,71]. Results of the theoretical studies of bond dissociation energy (BDE) have also shown the possible formation of a complex of thiamine and epigallocatechin gallate. The enthalpy of formation of this complex is 5.8 and 5.4 kcal/mol. The enthalpy of the BDE complex increases and hydrogen-bonded thiamine with EGCG reduces the antioxidant activity of EGCG. The bond dissociation energy increases and OH groups of the complex are less available and less effective as hydrogen donors [43,44,72].
When analyzing the stability of thiamine, in the course of 31 days of storage, it was found that thiamine in the form of pyrophosphate exhibits a lower stability. This is confirmed by previous studies related to both high-temperature processing and storage [9,11]. This could be explained by the fact that a smaller amount of activation energy is required to break down the thiazole ring of thiamine [7,15,73,74].
Our studies found that the thiamine losses followed a simple linear regression model. This was confirmed by the coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.99–0.96) and the root means square error (RMSE). The degradation patterns were consistent with those reported in previous studies [73,75]. The previous research confirmed that the degradation of thiamine followed a simple linear regression model and ended when the samples had approximately 40% thiamine.
The highest losses of thiamine were found with thiamine concentrations above 16 mg/100 g. Previous studies confirmed a higher pH range in a pediatric formulation containing high amounts of thiamine [70,71]. Thiamine is stable under acidic conditions but is labile in alkaline conditions with the opening of the thiazole ring and yields the thiol form. At low pH, thiamine is present with a positive charge on both the pyrimidine N1 nitrogen (pKa1 ≈ 4.8) and thiazole N3 nitrogen. At a pH above 6.0, thiamine is a cation with a positive charge on the thiazole N3 nitrogen. With a further increase in pH, its behavior is complex, passing through an uncharged pseudobase intermediate to yield its negatively charged thiol form (pKa2 ≈ 9.2) [7,73].
Our research showed a correlation between the stability of thiamine and the instability of oil. Previous research has also confirmed the relationship between fat oxidation and thiamine losses [44]. Our studies also confirmed a higher instability of thiamine in the presence of oxidation products, especially secondary products [43]. The earlier research results have also shown the high instability of thiamine in the presence of fat and that the addition of high-oxidized fat accelerated the total thiamine losses, when compared to low-oxidized fat, both after thermal processing and the storage of meat, e.g., chicken meat [50]. The earlier research results have shown that the oxidation transformation of thiamine proceeds via two independent pathways: with (2H+ + 2e−) splitting from the NH2 group of the pyrimidine ring with the formation of tricyclic thiamine, which is then converted into thiochrome, and with the opening of the thiazole ring and the loss of HS [74,76,77].
Our results showed that the addition of tea components, especially EGCG, increased the oxidative stability of fat and thus reduced the loss of thiamine. Earlier studies also indicate the existence of certain correlations between the activity of antioxidants and the content of thiamine [43,44].
Research results have shown a strong positive correlation between the instability of fat and a lower stability of thiamine [40,78]. It was found that the losses of thiamine hydrochloride during storage are correlated with the production of fat oxidation products, in particular with the content of the secondary products of that process. This correlation may be connected with thiamine sensitivity to redox factors that open its thiazole ring [79,80].
A higher loss of thiamine was observed in the samples with caffeine. These samples were characterized by the lowest correlation between the antioxidant activity of caffeine and thiamine stability. At low concentrations of tea components (0.08 and 0.8 mg/100 g), caffeine is in a stronger correlation with thiamine than EGCG. These results indicate that caffeine may have formed complexes with the thiamine forms. Earlier theoretical studies showed the possible formation of hydrogen-bonded complexes of thiamine with myricetin [79,81]. There were higher losses of thiamine in the samples containing EGCG at amounts exceeding 5 mg/100 g. Moreover, EGCG may have formed complexes with thiamine. Preliminary research has confirmed the possible formation of a complex of epigallocatechin gallate and thiamine [72]. It was found that the amounts of losses depended on the forms of thiamine. Moreover, earlier studies showed higher losses of thiamine introduced in the form of thiamine pyrophosphate [9].

5. Conclusions

It was found that the concentration of thiamine and antioxidant activity of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and caffeine are related to each other. The results of our study are consistent with the findings of earlier research on the antioxidant activity of EGCG and caffeine. It has been confirmed that the antioxidant activity of EGCG is higher than that of caffeine. The addition of tea components, especially EGCG, increased the oxidative stability of fat and thus reduced the loss of thiamine. However, our research also confirmed that this antioxidant activity of EGCG and caffeine in the presence of soybean oil was significantly reduced when the content of thiamine was higher than the natural level in foods, above 8.0 mg/100 g.
Therefore, in order to maintain thiamine stability and the high activity of the active tea ingredients and thiamine stability, it is necessary to consider their simultaneous addition to the systems in concentrations that limit their interactions. Accordingly, these encouraging insights may be interesting for nutritionists as well as food producers offering products for consumers who are at high risk of thiamine deficiency, such as people with Alzheimer’s disease as well as vegans and vegetarians. However, further research is necessary to discover ways to block the interaction of thiamine with test compounds.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su13094644/s1. Table S1: Peroxide value to samples with thiamine hydrochloride and EGCG. Table S2: Peroxide value to samples with thiamine pyrophosphate and EGCG. Table S3: Peroxide value to samples with thiamine hydrochloride and caffeine. Table S4: Peroxide value to samples with thiamine pyrophosphate and caffeine. Table S5: Anisidine value LAN to samples with thiamine hydrochloride and EGCG. Table S6: Anisidine value LAN to samples with thiamine pyrophosphate and EGCG. Table S7: Anisidine value LAN to samples with thiamine hydrochloride and caffeine. Table S8: Anisidine value LAN to samples with thiamine pyrophosphate and caffeine. Table S9: The protection factor (Wo) to samples with thiamine hydrochloride and EGCG. Table S10: The protection factor (Wo) to samples with thiamine pyrophosphate and EGCG. Table S11: The protection factor (Wo) to samples with thiamine hydrochloride and caffeine. Table S12: The protection factor (Wo) to samples with thiamine pyrophosphate and caffeine.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: J.P. and K.S.-B.; formal analysis: J.P. and K.S.-B.; methodology: J.P. and K.S.-B.; validation: J.P. and K.S.-B.; visualization: J.P. and K.S.-B.; writing—original draft: J.P. and K.S.-B.; writing—review & editing: J.P. and K.S.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The publication was co-financed by statutory funds of the Department of Gastronomy Science and Functional Foods of Poznan University of Life Sciences [grant no. 506.751.03.00].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Depeint, F.; Bruce, W.R.; Shangari, N.; Mehta, R.; O’Brien, P.J. Mitochondrial Function and Toxicity: Role of the B Vitamin Family on Mitochondrial Energy Metabolism. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2006, 163, 94–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sriram, K.; Manzanares, W.; Joseph, K. Thiamine in Nutrition Therapy. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2012, 27, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kanner, J. Oxidative Processes in Meat and Meat Products: Quality Implications. Meat Sci. 1994, 36, 169–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pacei, F.; Tesone, A.; Laudi, N.; Laudi, E.; Cretti, A.; Pnini, S.; Varesco, F.; Colombo, C. The Relevance of Thiamine Evaluation in a Practical Setting. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kunisawa, J.; Sugiura, Y.; Wake, T.; Nagatake, T.; Suzuki, H.; Nagasawa, R.; Shikata, S.; Honda, K.; Hashimoto, E.; Suzuki, Y.; et al. Mode of Bioenergetic Metabolism during B Cell Differentiation in the Intestine Determines the Distinct Requirement for Vitamin B1. Cell Rep. 2015, 13, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Dehghani-Samani, A.; Kamali, M.; Hoseinzadeh-Chahkandak, F. The Role of Vitamins on the Prevention and/or Treatment of COVID-19 Infection; A Systematic Review. Mod. Care J. 2020, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Edwards, K.A.; Tu-Maung, N.; Cheng, K.; Wang, B.; Baeumner, A.J.; Kraft, C.E. Thiamine Assays—Advances, Challenges, and Caveats. ChemistryOpen 2017, 6, 178–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tylicki, A.; Siemieniuk, M. Thiamine and Its Derivatives in the Regulation of Cell Metabolism. Adv. Hyg. Exp. Med. 2011, 65, 447–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Szymandera-Buszka, K.; Piechocka, J.; Zaremba, A.; Przeor, M.; Jędrusek-Golińska, A. Pumpkin, Cauliflower and Broccoli as New Carriers of Thiamine Compounds for Food Fortification. Foods 2021, 10, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lombardi-Boccia, G.; Lanzi, S.; Aguzzi, A. Aspects of Meat Quality: Trace Elements and B Vitamins in Raw and Cooked Meats. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2005, 18, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Szymandera-Buszka, K.; Hęś, M.; Waszkowiak, K.; Jędrusek-Golińska, A. Thiamine Losses during Storage of Pasteurised and Sterilized Model Systems of Minced Chicken Meat with Addition of Fresh and Oxidized Fat, and Antioxidants. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2014, 13, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Whitfield, K.C.; Smith, G.; Chamnan, C.; Karakochuk, C.D.; Sophonneary, P.; Kuong, K.; Dijkhuizen, M.A.; Hong, R.; Berger, J.; Green, T.J.; et al. High Prevalence of Thiamine (Vitamin B1) Deficiency in Early Childhood among a Nationally Representative Sample of Cambodian Women of Childbearing Age and Their Children. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Waszkowiak, K.; Szymandera_Buszka, K.; Janitz, W.; Gorecka, D. Comparative Evaluation of Nutritive and Sensory Value of Selected Raw Materials and Dishes after Thermal Processing in a Convection Oven and with Conventional Methods. Electron. J. Pol. Agric. Univ. 1999, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kumar, S.; Aalbersberg, B. Nutrient Retention in Foods after Earth-oven Cooking Compared to Other Forms of Domestic Cooking: 2. Vitamins. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2006, 19, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kadakal, Ç.; Duman, T.; Ekinci, R. Thermal Degradation Kinetics of Ascorbic Acid, Thiamine and Riboflavin in Rosehip (Rosa canina L) Nectar. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 38, 667–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Szymandera-Buszka, K.; Waszkowiak, K. Qualitative and Quantitative Changes of Thiamine in Turkey Meatballs in the Presence of Potassium Iodide. Technol. Aliment. 2003, 2, 95–101. [Google Scholar]
  17. DiNicolantonio, J.J.; Lavie, C.J.; Niazi, A.K.; O’Keefe, J.H.; Hu, T. Effects of Thiamine on Cardiac Function in Patients with Systolic Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trials. Ochsner J. 2013, 13, 495–499. [Google Scholar]
  18. DiNicolantonio, J.J.; Liu, J.; O’Keefe, J.H. Thiamine and Cardiovascular Disease: A Literature Review. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2018, 61, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Whitfield, K.C.; Bourassa, M.W.; Adamolekun, B.; Bergeron, G.; Bettendorff, L.; Brown, K.H.; Cox, L.; Fattal-Valevski, A.; Fischer, P.R.; Frank, E.L.; et al. Thiamine Deficiency Disorders: Diagnosis, Prevalence, and a Roadmap for Global Control Programs. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2018, 1430, 3–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Gibson, G.E.; Hirsch, J.A.; Fonzetti, P.; Jordan, B.D.; Cirio, R.T.; Elder, J. Vitamin B1 (Thiamine) and Dementia. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2016, 1367, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Giacalone, M.; Martinelli, R.; Abramo, A.; Rubino, A.; Pavoni, V.; Iacconi, P.; Giunta, F.; Forfori, F. Rapid Reversal of Severe Lactic Acidosis after Thiamine Administration in Critically Ill Adults: A Report of 3 Cases. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2015, 30, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Portari, G.V.; Marchini, J.S.; Vannucchi, H.; Jordao, A.A. Antioxidant Effect of Thiamine on Acutely Alcoholized Rats and Lack of Efficacy Using Thiamine or Glucose to Reduce Blood Alcohol Content. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2008, 103, 482–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Campos-Bowers, M.H.; Wittenmyer, B.F. Biofortification in China: Policy and Practice. Health Res. Policy Syst. 2007, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Ribeiro, D.O.; Pinto, D.C.; Lima, L.M.T.R.; Volpato, N.M.; Cabral, L.M.; De Sousa, V.P. Chemical Stability Study of Vitamins Thiamine, Riboflavin, Pyridoxine and Ascorbic Acid in Parenteral Nutrition for Neonatal Use. Nutr. J. 2011, 10, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Wilson, D.W.; Nash, P.; Singh, H.; Griffiths, K.; Singh, R.; De Meester, F.; Horiuchi, R.; Takahashi, T. The Role of Food Antioxidants, Benefits of Functional Foods, and Influence of Feeding Habits on the Health of the Older Person: An Overview. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Otaegui-Arrazola, A.; Amiano, P.; Elbusto, A.; Urdaneta, E.; Martínez-Lage, P. Diet, Cognition, and Alzheimer’s Disease: Food for Thought. Eur. J. Nutr. 2014, 53, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Veurink, G.; Perry, G.; Singh, S.K. Role of Antioxidants and a Nutrient Rich Diet in Alzheimer’s Disease: AD and Nutraceuticals. Open Biol. 2020, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yoshioka, A.; Sato, I.; Onishi, H.; Ishida, M. Subclinical Thiamine Deficiency Identified by Pretreatment Evaluation in an Esophageal Cancer Patient. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 3–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kobus-Cisowska, J.; Szulc, P.; Szczepaniak, O.; Dziedziński, M.; Szymanowska, D.; Szymandera-Buszka, K.; Goryńska-Goldmann, E.; Gazdecki, M.; Telichowska, A.; Ligaj, M. Variability of Hordeum vulgare L. Cultivars in Yield, Antioxidant Potential, and Cholinesterase Inhibitory Activity. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Nour, V.; Trandafir, I.; Cosmulescu, S. Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant Activity and Nutritional Quality of Different Culinary Aromatic Herbs. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. 2017, 45, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Yashin, A.; Yashin, Y.; Xia, X.; Nemzer, B. Antioxidant Activity of Spices and Their Impact on Human Health: A Review. Antioxidants. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Nakatani, N. Phenolic Antioxidants from Herbs and Spices. BioFactors 2000, 13, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hęś, M.; Gramza-Michałowska, A. Effect of Plant Extracts on Lipid Oxidation and Changes in Nutritive Value of Protein in Frozen-stored Meat Products. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2017, 41, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Forester, S.C.; Lambert, J.D. Antioxidant Effects of Green Tea. Mol. Nutr. Food Res 2013, 55, 844–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Ramsaha, S.; Aumjaud, B.E. Polyphenolic Rich Traditional Plants and Teas Improve Lipid Stability in Food Test Systems. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 773–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Makita, Y.; Ishida, T.; Kobayashi, N.; Fujio, M.; Fujimoto, K.; Moritomo, R.; Fujita, J.; Fujiwara, S. Evaluation of the Bitterness-Masking Effect of Powdered Roasted Soybeans. Foods 2016, 5, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Prabsangob, N.; Benjakul, S. Effect of Tea Catechin Derivatives on Stability of Soybean Oil/Tea Seed Oil Blend and Oxidative Stability of Fried Fish Crackers during Storage. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 28, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Naveed, M.; BiBi, J.; Kamboh, A.A.; Suheryani, I.; Kakar, I.; Fazlani, S.A.; FangFang, X.; Kalhoro, S.A.; Yunjuan, L.; Kakar, M.U.; et al. Pharmacological Values and Therapeutic Properties of Black Tea (Camellia sinensis): A Comprehensive Overview. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 100, 521–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Miyata, Y.; ScienMatsuoces, T.; Araki, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Sagara, Y.; Ohba, K.; Sakai, H. Anticancer Effects of Green Tea and the Underlying Molecular Mechanisms in Bladder Cancer. Medicines 2018, 5, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Tang, G.Y.; Meng, X.; Gan, R.Y.; Zhao, C.N.; Liu, Q.; Feng, Y.B.; Li, S.; Wei, X.L.; Atanasov, A.G.; Corke, H.; et al. Health Functions and Related Molecular Mechanisms of Tea Components: An Update Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Del Rio, D.; Rodriguez-Mateos, A.; Spencer, J.P.E.; Tognolini, M.; Borges, G.; Crozier, A. Dietary (Poly)phenolics in Human Health: Structures, Bioavailability, and Evidence of Protective Effects Against Chronic Diseases. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 18, 1818–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Pokorný, J.; Korczak, J. Preparation of Natural Antioxidants. Antioxidants Food 2001, 311–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Szymandera-Buszka, K. Study on Stability of Thiamine in the Presence of Selected Fat Products and Antioxidants; Poznań University of Life Sciences Publishing: Poznań, Poland, 2014; Volume 471. [Google Scholar]
  44. Piechocka, J.; Szymandera-Buszka, K.; Kobus-Cisowska, J.; Gramza-Michałowska, A.; Jędrusek-Golińska, A. The Effect of Thiamine Concentration on the Antioxidative Activity Indices in Tea Extracts. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Vegetable and Animal Oils and Fats. Determination of Peroxide Value; PN-EN ISO 3960; International Organization for Standardization ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  46. Animal and Vegetable Fats and Oils–Determination of Peroxide Value–Iodometric (Visual) Endpoint Determination; ISO 3960:2017; International Organization for Standardization ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
  47. Animal and Vegetable Fats and Oils–Determination of Anisidine Value; ISO 6885:2016; International Organization for Standardization ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
  48. Kondratowicz-Pietruszka, E. Analysis of Oxidative Changes Occurring in Olive Oil during Storage. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2007, 57, 297–302. [Google Scholar]
  49. Waszkowiak, K.; Szymandera-Buszka, K. Effect of Collagen Preparations Used as Carriers of Potassium Iodide on Retention of Iodine and Thiamine during Cooking and Storage of Pork Meatballs. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2007, 87, 1473–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Szymandera-Buszka, K.; Waszkowiak, K. Effect of Selected Fat Products on Stability of Thiamine Hydrochloride. Food. Sci. Technol. Qual. 2014, 21, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mukaka, M.M. Statistics Corner: A Guide to Appropriate Use of Correlation Coefficient in Medical Research. Malawi Med. J. 2012, 24, 69–71. [Google Scholar]
  52. Yang, H.; Xue, X.; Li, H.; Apandi, S.N.; Tay-Chan, S.C.; Ong, S.P.; Tian, E.F. The Relative Antioxidant Activity and Steric Structure of Green Tea Catechins–A Kinetic Approach. Food Chem. 2018, 257, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. El-Anany, A. Antioxidative Effect of Tea Extracts on Oxidation of Soybean Oil during Deep-fat Frying Process. Adv. Food Sci. 2013, 35, 181–189. [Google Scholar]
  54. Lin, J.K.; Lin, C.L.; Liang, Y.C.; Lin-Shiau, S.Y.; Juan, I.M. Survey of Catechins, Gallic Acid, and Methylxanthines in Green, Oolong, Pu-erh, and Black Teas. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 3635–3642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lin, Y.S.; Tsai, Y.J.; Tsay, J.S.; Lin, J.K. Factors Affecting the Levels of Tea Polyphenols and Caffeine in Tea Leaves. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 1864–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Horie, M.; Nara, K.; Sugino, S.; Umeno, A.; Yoshida, Y. Comparison of Antioxidant Activities among Four Kinds of Japanese Traditional Fermented Tea. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 5, 639–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Devasagayam, D.P.A.; Kamat, J.P.; Mohan, H.; Kesavan, P.C. Caffeine as an Antioxidant: Inhibition of Lipid Peroxidation Induced by Reactive Oxygen Species. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1996, 1282, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Vieira, A.J.S.C.; Gaspar, E.M.; Santos, P.M.P. Mechanisms of Potential Antioxidant Activity of Caffeine. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2020, 174, 108968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tewabe Gebeyehu, B. Determination of Caffeine Content and Antioxidant Activity of Coffee. Am. J. Appl. Chem. 2015, 3, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Gadow, A.; Joubert, E.; Hansmann, C.F. Comparison of the Antioxidant Activity of Rooibos Tea (Aspalathus linearis) with Green, Oolong, and Black Tea. Food Chem. 1997, 60, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gramza-Michałowska, A.; Kobus-Cisowska, J.; Kmiecik, D.; Korczak, J.; Helak, B.; Dziedzic, K.; Górecka, D. Antioxidative Potential, Nutritional Value and Sensory Profiles of Confectionery Fortified with Green and Yellow Tea Leaves (Camellia sinensis). Food Chem. 2016, 211, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tenore, G.; Daglia, M.; Ciampaglia, R.; Novellino, E. Exploring the Nutraceutical Potential of Polyphenols from Black, Green and White Tea Infusions–An Overview. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2015, 16, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Yen, G.C.; Chen, H.Y. Antioxidant Activity of Various Tea Extracts in Relation to Their Antimutagenicity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1995, 43, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Carloni, P.; Tiano, L.; Padella, L.; Bacchetti, T.; Customu, C.; Kay, A.; Damiani, E. Antioxidant Activity of White, Green and Black Tea Obtained from the Same Tea Cultivar. Food Res. Int. 2013, 53, 900–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chu, C.; Deng, J.; Man, Y.; Qu, Y. Green Tea Extracts Epigallocatechin-3-gallate for Different Treatments. Biomed Res. Int. 2017, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Fernando, C.D.; Soysa, P. Extraction Kinetics of Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activity during Black Tea (Camellia sinensis L.) Brewing. Nutr. J. 2015, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Unachukwu, U.J.; Ahmed, S.; Kavalier, A.; Lyles, J.T.; Kennelly, E.J. White and Green Teas (Camellia sinensis var. sinensis): Variation in Phenolic, Methylxanthine, and Antioxidant Profiles. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Nikoo, M.; Regenstein, J.M.; Ahmadi Gavlighi, H. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) and Its Potential to Preserve the Quality and Safety of Foods. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 732–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Protegente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.C.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant Activity an Improved ABTS Radical Cation Decolorization Assay. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Musial, C.; Kuban-Jankowska, A.; Gorska-Ponikowska, M. Beneficial Properties of Green Tea Catechins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Komatsu, Y.; Suematsu, S.; Hisanobu, Y.; Saigo, H.; Matsuda, R.; Hara, K. Effects of pH and Temperature on Reaction Kinetics of Catechins in Green Tea Infusion. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1993, 57, 907–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Szymusiak, H. Studies on the Effectiveness of Selected Antioxidants Found in Food Products; Publisher of the University of Economics: Poznań, Poland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  73. Voelker, A.L.; Miller, J.; Running, C.A.; Taylor, L.S.; Mauer, L.J. Chemical Stability and Reaction Kinetics of Two Thiamine Salts (Thiamine Mononitrate and Thiamine Chloride Hydrochloride) in Solution. In Food Research International; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 112, ISBN 7654949111. [Google Scholar]
  74. Dwivedi, B.K.; Arnold, R.G. Chemistry of Thiamine Degradation: 4-methyl-S(β-hydroksyethyl)thiazole from Thermally Degradation Thiamine. J. Food Sci. 1972, 37, 689–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bui, L.T.T.; Small, D.M. The Stability of Pyridoxine Hydrochloride Used as a Fortificant in Asian Wheat Flour Noodles. Food Chem. 2012, 130, 841–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Dwivedi, B.K.; Arnold, R.G. Hydrogen Sulfi de from Heat Degradation of Thiamine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1971, 19, 923–926. [Google Scholar]
  77. Lukienko, P.I.; Melnichenko, N.G.; Zverinskii, I.V.; Zabrodskaya, S. V Antioxidant Properties of Thiamine. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2000, 130, 874–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jin-Wei, L.; Shao-Dong, D.; Xiao-Lin, D. Comparison of Antioxidant Capacities of Extracts from Five Cultivars of Chinese Jujube. Process Biochem. 2005, 40, 3607–3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gliszczynska-Swiglo, A. Antioxidant Activity of Water Soluble Vitamins in the TEAC (Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity) and the FRAP (Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power) Assays. Food Chem. 2006, 96, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tang, S.Z.; Kerry, J.P.; Sheehan, D.; Buckley, D.J. Antioxidative Mechanisms of Tea Catechins in Chicken Meat Systems. Food Chem. 2002, 76, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gliszczynska-Swiglo, A.; Szymusiak, H. Interaction of Food Flavonoids with Vitamins. Myricetin and Vitamin B1 as Model Compounds. Publ. Kyiv Natl. Univ. Trade Econ. Kiev Ukr. 2006, 2, 774–778. [Google Scholar]
Sustainability 13 04644 g001a 550Sustainability 13 04644 g001b 550
Figure 1. The protection factor (Wo) of EGCG (a) and caffeine (b) in the presence of thiamine hydrochloride (1) and thiamine pyrophosphate (2).
Figure 1. The protection factor (Wo) of EGCG (a) and caffeine (b) in the presence of thiamine hydrochloride (1) and thiamine pyrophosphate (2).
Sustainability 13 04644 g001aSustainability 13 04644 g001b
Sustainability 13 04644 g002a 550Sustainability 13 04644 g002b 550
Figure 2. Contents of thiamine pyrophosphate (TP) and thiamine hydrochloride (TCh) in soybean oil among storage at 30°C in the presence of EGCG (1) and caffeine (2) at concentrations of 0.5 mg/100 g (b), 1.0 mg/100 g (c), and 6.0 mg/100 g (d) and without the addition of caffeine and EGCG (a).
Figure 2. Contents of thiamine pyrophosphate (TP) and thiamine hydrochloride (TCh) in soybean oil among storage at 30°C in the presence of EGCG (1) and caffeine (2) at concentrations of 0.5 mg/100 g (b), 1.0 mg/100 g (c), and 6.0 mg/100 g (d) and without the addition of caffeine and EGCG (a).
Sustainability 13 04644 g002aSustainability 13 04644 g002b
Table
Table 1. Correlation coefficients between the Protection Factor (Wo) of EGCG and caffeine, and the content of thiamine hydrochloride and thiamine pyrophosphate.
Table 1. Correlation coefficients between the Protection Factor (Wo) of EGCG and caffeine, and the content of thiamine hydrochloride and thiamine pyrophosphate.
Concentration [mg/100 g]
EGCG/		Correlation Coefficient of Wo and Content of Thiamine Hydrochloride
EGCG/CaffeineThiamine HydrochlorideThiamine HydrochlorideThiamine Pyrophosphate
EGCGCaffeineEGCGCaffeine
0.5 mg0–0.06 0.178 NS0.185 NS0.111 NS0.121 NS
0.08–1.0 0.793 ***0.889 ****0.721 ***0.865 ***
1.0–20 −0.984 ****−0.974 ****−0.955 ****−0.974 ****
1.0 mg0–0.06 −0.162 NS0.178 NS−0.155 NS0.098 NS
0.08–1.0 0.771 ***0.540 **0.724 ***0.540 **
1.0–20 −0.901 ****−0.887 ***−0.905 ****−0.965 ****
2.0 mg0–0.06 −0.155 NS0.171 NS−0.121 NS0.112 NS
0.08–1.0 0.775 ***0.560 **0.722 ***0.560 **
1.0–20 −0.943 ****−0.849 ***−0.901 ****−0.849 ***
3.0 mg0–0.06 0.126 NS−0.013 NS0.115 NS−0.018 NS
0.08–1.0 0.677 **−0.517 ***0.621 ***−0.514 ***
1.0–20 −0.917 ****−0.718 ***−0.900 ****−0.721 ***
4.0 mg0–0.06 −0.170 NS−0.013 NS−0.056 NS−0.021 NS
0.08–1.0 0.647 **−0.106 NS0.633 **−0.111 NS
1.0–20 −0.851 ***−0.612 **−0.832 ***−0.550 **
5.0 mg0–0.06 −0.200 *−0.032 NS−0.130 NS−0.032 NS
0.08–1.0 −0.319 *0.141 NS−0.220 *0.141 NS
1.0–20 −0.726 ***−0.443 **−0.426 **−0.463 **
6.0 mg0–0.06 0.121 NS0.108 NS0.061 NS0.055 NS
0.08–1.0 0.348 *−0.111 NS0.167 NS−0.111 NS
1.0–20 −0.638 **−0.349 *−0.408 **−0.249 *
Without additions0–0.06 0.158 * 0.063 NS
0.08–1.0 0.724 *** 0.695 **
1.0–20 −0.881 *** −0.851 ***
**** linear relationship very strong; *** linear relationship significant; ** linear relationship moderate; * linear dependence weak; NS no linear relationship at: p ≤ 0.05; n = 14.
Table
Table 2. Dynamic of changes in thiamine hydrochloride content (mg kg−1) over 31 days in the presence of tea components. (EGCG and caffeine) and soybean oil shown as values of the half time of thiamine losses (T1/2) and coefficients in regression equations.
Table 2. Dynamic of changes in thiamine hydrochloride content (mg kg−1) over 31 days in the presence of tea components. (EGCG and caffeine) and soybean oil shown as values of the half time of thiamine losses (T1/2) and coefficients in regression equations.
Concentration
[mg/100 g]		Dynamic of Change in Thiamine Content Over 31 Days
EGCGCaffeine
EGCG/CaffeineThiamineT1/2
[Days]		R2RMSEY = ax + b−1T1/2
[days]		R2RMSEY = ax + b−1
Coeff. a 24 h−1bCoeff. a 24 h−1b
0.50.0179.650.990.00005−(4.1 ± 0.01) × 10−51.01 ± 0.00171.180.990.00007−(8.2 ± 0.00) × 10−51.01 ± 0.000
0.0679.820.970.00026−(2.4 ± 0.04) × 10−41.06 ± 0.00070.750.990.06255−(3.7 ± 0.02) × 10−41.06 ± 0.000
0.180.920.970.02738−(1.3 ± 0.03) × 10−41.12 ± 0.00169.530.980.00081−(6.2 ± 0.02) × 10−41.11 ± 0.000
0.280.140.970.00088−(8.1 ± 0.00) × 10−41.22 ± 0.00271.740.980.00140−(1.1 ± 0.02) × 10−31.23 ± 0.000
1.082.860.970.07186−(3.6 ± 0.01) × 10−32.84 ± 0.00175.230.980.10058−(5.0 ± 0.02) × 10−32.75 ± 0.000
8.077.830.970.02467−(3.5 ± 0.05) × 10−22.99 ± 0.00367.480.980.06913−(5.3 ± 0.01) × 10−23.12 ± 0.003
16.074.880.960.20155−(8.4 ± 0.04) × 10−21.14 ± 0.00763.340.980.14957−(1.2 ± 0.03) × 10−19.95 ± 0.006
20.067.780.990.15864−(1.3 ± 0.01) × 10−14.77 ± 0.00863.810.990.15143−(1.4 ± 0.01) × 10−14.47 ± 0.008
1.000.0183.520.990.00006−(4.9 ± 0.00) × 10−51.01 ± 0.00070.170.990.00008−(7.8 ± 0.00) × 10−51.01 ± 0.000
0.0680.380.970.00035−(2.3 ± 0.07) × 10−41.06 ± 0.00072.420.980.00046−(3.4 ± 0.01) × 10−41.06 ± 0.000
0.180.890.970.00032−(4.2 ± 0.01) × 10−41.10 ± 0.00070.560.990.00383−(5.8 ± 0.06) × 10−41.10 ± 0.000
0.282.370.970.00055−(7.5 ± 0.05) × 10−41.25 ± 0.00171.900.980.00149−(1.2 ± 0.02) × 10−31.25 ± 0.000
1.082.980.970.08374−(4.2 ± 0.07) × 10−32.82 ± 0.00075.030.980.10009−(5.0 ± 0.03) × 10−32.74 ± 0.000
8.078.850.970.02443−(3.5 ± 0.00) × 10−22.98 ± 0.00370.640.980.06017−(4.8 ± 0.04) × 10−23.30 ± 0.003
16.069.750.960.17299−(9.1 ± 0.07) × 10−28.98 ± 0.00663.680.970.18432−(1.1 ± 0.03) × 10−17.48 ± 0.006
20.074.890.990.15937−(1.3 ± 0.07) × 10−15.94 ± 0.00863.160.960.29129−(1.4 ± 0.04) × 10−14.23 ± 0.008
3.000.0183.520.980.00003−(4.3 ± 0.00) × 10−51.01 ± 0.00169.780.970.00011−(6.5 ± 0.00) × 10−51.01 ± 0.000
0.0680.380.990.00046−(2.4 ± 0.01) × 10−41.06 ± 0.00069.860.980.00056−(3.7 ± 0.02) × 10−41.06 ± 0.000
0.180.890.980.08285−(3.8 ± 0.05) × 10−41.10 ± 0.00069.800.980.00085−(6.6 ± 0.04) × 10−41.12 ± 0.000
0.282.370.980.00074−(7.8 ± 0.07) × 10−41.25 ± 0.00170.590.970.00234−(1.3 ± 0.04) × 10−41.25 ± 0.000
1.082.980.990.06827−(3.5 ± 0.06) × 10−32.82 ± 0.00072.510.970.11669−(5.9 ± 0.03) × 10−32.99 ± 0.000
8.078.850.960.03103−(3.3 ± 0.02) × 10−22.98 ± 0.00372.350.970.07762−(4.3 ± 0.03) × 10−22.81 ± 0.003
16.069.750.960.18356−(9.6 ± 0.01) × 10−28.98 ± 0.00670.400.990.08552−(9.5 ± 0.03) × 10−28.87 ± 0.006
20.074.890.980.16432−(1.0 ± 0.04) × 10−15.94 ± 0.00863.930.980.19509−(1.4 ± 0.01) × 10−14.79 ± 0.008
5.000.0172.490.980.00011−(8.2 ± 0.02) × 10−51.02 ± 0.00071.550.990.00013−(1.2 ± 0.00) × 10−41.02 ± 0.000
0.0672.790.990.00040−(3.3 ± 0.03) × 10−41.06 ± 0.00071.870.980.00064−(3.8 ± 0.02) × 10−41.06 ± 0.000
0.172.870.980.00076(5.9 ± 0.01) × 10−41.12 ± 0.00071.830.980.00105−(8.0 ± 0.02) × 10−41.13 ± 0.000
0.273.600.980.00149−(1.1 ± 0.00) × 10−41.25 ± 0.00173.580.990.00202−(1.4 ± 0.02) × 10−31.24 ± 0.000
1.074.940.990.10646−(5.4 ± 0.04) × 10−32.99 ± 0.00072.180.980.13223−(6.7 ± 0.02) × 10−33.00 ± 0.000
8.075.960.960.07356−(3.8 ± 0.09) × 10−22.86 ± 0.00369.130.980.04546−(5.5 ± 0.01) × 10−23.01 ± 0.003
16.069.700.980.56298−(3.6 ± 0.05) × 10−23.17 ± 0.00768.150.980.16410−(1.1 ± 0.03) × 10−18.67 ± 0.006
20.069.590.980.15284−(1.2 ± 0.01) × 10−14.48 ± 0.00864.050.980.19239−(1.5 ± 0.01) × 10−14.55 ± 0.008
6.000.0171.490.970.00015−(9.5 ± 0.05) × 10−51.02 ± 0.00163.520.990.00013−(1.2 ± 0.03) × 10−41.02 ± 0.000
0.0672.000.990.00030−(3.3 ± 0.03) × 10−41.06 ± 0.00168.940.970.00064−(3.8 ± 0.01) × 10−41.06 ± 0.000
0.172.620.980.00082(6.4 ± 0.05) × 10−41.13 ± 0.00166.420.980.00105−(8.0 ± 0.01) × 10−41.13 ± 0.000
0.272.010.980.00155−(1.2 ± 0.03) × 10−41.25 ± 0.00167.440.980.00202−(1.4 ± 0.01) × 10−31.24 ± 0.000
1.073.750.990.10723−(5.4 ± 0.04) × 10−32.83 ± 0.00169.370.980.13223−(6.7 ± 0.05) × 10−33.00 ± 0.000
8.078.630.990.03904−(3.4 ± 0.03) × 10−22.97 ± 0.00365.570.990.04546−(5.5 ± 0.01) × 10−23.01 ± 0.003
16.073.210.980.12157−(8.4 ± 0.05) × 10−27.91 ± 0.00662.940.980.16410−(1.2 ± 0.06) × 10−18.67 ± 0.006
20.070.830.970.18008−(1.1 ± 0.04) × 10−14.43 ± 0.00861.170.980.19239−(1.5 ± 0.04) × 10−14.55 ± 0.008
Without additions0.0168.160.970.00011−(6.0 ± 0.00) × 10−51.01 ± 0.000
0.0668.530.970.00063−(3.4 ± 0.01) × 10−41.06 ± 0.000
0.169.660.970.00092(5.2 ± 0.03) × 10−41.09 ± 0.001
0.270.620.970.00201−(8.1 ± 0.03) × 10−41.22 ± 0.000
1.067.780.970.11460−(1.1 ± 0.02) × 10−32.77 ± 0.000
8.065.000.970.08939−(6.3 ± 0.03) × 10−22.70 ± 0.003
16.061.820.960.23382−(1.1 ± 0.03) × 10−25.45 ± 0.006
20.057.640.990.19417−(1.6 ± 0.02) × 10−13.40 ± 0.008
Simple linear regression equation y = ax + b (the linear least-squares method; y—dependent variable; x—independent variable; a—independent variable coeff./slope of the line; b—intercept). Coeff. a/24 h—change of coeff. a in 24 h storage time. R2—coeff. of determination (the square of correlation coefficient r). The coeff. A/24 h shows the dynamics of changes in thiamine content. Half time T½ (in days) is the time in which the initial thiamine content decreases by half.
Table
Table 3. Dynamic of changes in thiamine pyrophosphate content (mg kg−1) over 31 days in the presence of tea components. (EGCG and caffeine) and soybean oil shown as values of the half time of thiamine losses (T1/2) and coefficients in regression equations.
Table 3. Dynamic of changes in thiamine pyrophosphate content (mg kg−1) over 31 days in the presence of tea components. (EGCG and caffeine) and soybean oil shown as values of the half time of thiamine losses (T1/2) and coefficients in regression equations.
Concentration
[mg/100g]		Dynamic of Change in Thiamine Content Over 31 Days
EGCGCaffeine
EGCG/CaffeineThiamineT1/2
[Days]		R2RMSEY = ax + b−1T1/2
[Days]		R2RMSEY = ax + b−1
Coeff. A 24 h−1bCoeff. a 24 h−1b
0.50.0178.910.990.00004−(4.1 ± 0.04) × 10−51.01 ± 0.00071.430.990.00006−(8.0 ± 0.03) × 10−51.01 ± 0.000
0.0678.830.970.00014−(2.4 ± 0.03) × 10−41.06 ± 0.00070.320.980.06249−(3.7 ± 0.00) × 10−41.06 ± 0.000
0.180.270.970.00003−(4.6 ± 0.02) × 10−51.01 ± 0.00068.280.990.00055−(6.5 ± 0.05) × 10−41.11 ± 0.000
0.279.620.970.00055−(7.8 ± 0.07) × 10−41.22 ± 0.00069.660.990.00095−(1.3 ± 0.05) × 10−31.23 ± 0.000
1.082.140.970.07093−(3.6 ± 0.01) × 10−32.81 ± 0.00073.850.980.10240−(5.2 ± 0.04) × 10−32.74 ± 0.000
8.076.390.970.03813−(3.7 ± 0.01) × 10−22.90 ± 0.00366.390.990.04389−(5.5 ± 0.04) × 10−23.16 ± 0.003
16.075.460.960.05601−(7.7 ± 0.08) × 10−28.46 ± 0.00661.760.990.09857−(1.2 ± 0.03) × 10−19.27 ± 0.006
20.065.380.990.15683−(1.4 ± 0.00) × 10−15.42 ± 0.00859.361.000.10918−(1.6 ± 0.01) × 10−14.70 ± 0.008
1.000.0179.940.990.00006−(5.1 ± 0.01) × 10−51.01 ± 0.00069.340.990.00007−(8.2 ± 0.05) × 10−51.01 ± 0.000
0.0680.180.970.00035−(2.3 ± 0.01) × 10−41.06 ± 0.00072.110.980.00047−(3.5 ± 0.03) × 10−41.06 ± 0.000
0.179.850.970.00043−(4.3 ± 0.04) × 10−41.12 ± 0.00069.760.990.00281−(6.0 ± 0.02) × 10−41.10 ± 0.000
0.280.140.970.00104−(7.1 ± 0.01) × 10−41.22 ± 0.00070.470.990.00140−(1.3 ± 0.01) × 10−31.25 ± 0.000
1.078.570.970.08723−(4.5 ± 0.02) × 10−32.82 ± 0.00073.730.990.10627−(5.3 ± 0.02) × 10−32.75 ± 0.000
8.076.430.970.03620−(3.7 ± 0.00) × 10−22.90 ± 0.00370.340.980.05975−(4.8 ± 0.01) × 10−23.20 ± 0.003
16.073.210.960.12450−(8.6 ± 0.04) × 10−29.07 ± 0.00660.980.990.14877−(1.2 ± 0.02) × 10−18.23 ± 0.006
20.065.850.990.17048−(1.3 ± 0.04) × 10−14.45 ± 0.00859.900.980.19947−(1.6 ± 0.00) × 10−14.94 ± 0.008
3.000.0181.080.980.00002−(4.6 ± 0.05) × 10−51.01 ± 0.00066.960.990.00008−(7.2 ± 0.05) × 10−51.01 ± 0.000
0.0677.230.970.00017−(2.8 ± 0.01) × 10−41.06 ± 0.00067.090.990.00041−(4.1 ± 0.01) × 10−41.06 ± 0.000
0.178.000.970.00043−(4.3 ± 0.00) × 10−41.10 ± 0.00067.521.000.00044−(7.2 ± 0.04) × 10−41.12 ± 0.000
0.279.710.970.00070−(8.8 ± 0.04) × 10−41.25 ± 0.00067.900.990.00154−(1.4 ± 0.00) × 10−31.25 ± 0.000
1.079.800.970.08040−(4.1 ± 0.04) × 10−32.81 ± 0.00069.480.990.13142−(6.7 ± 0.05) × 10−32.99 ± 0.000
8.074.900.970.06003−(3.9 ± 0.01) × 10−22.91 ± 0.00369.690.990.05405−(4.8 ± 0.01) × 10−22.90 ± 0.003
16.072.400.960.13497−(8.6 ± 0.04) × 10−28.47 ± 0.00668.191.000.06643−(1.0 ± 0.01) × 10−18.57 ± 0.006
20.072.220.990.15062−(1.1 ± 0.04) × 10−14.13 ± 0.00861.380.990.11964−(1.5 ± 0.02) × 10−14.99 ± 0.008
5.000.0169.980.990.00008−(8.9 ± 0.00) × 10−51.02 ± 0.00070.170.990.00011−(1.0 ± 0.00) × 10−41.02 ± 0.000
0.0670.350.970.00031−(3.6 ± 0.03) × 10−41.06 ± 0.00070.180.990.00044−(3.7 ± 0.00) × 10−41.06 ± 0.000
0.170.380.970.00057−(6.4 ± 0.04) × 10−41.12 ± 0.00069.710.990.00068−(7.3 ± 0.04) × 10−41.13 ± 0.000
0.271.170.970.00114−(1.2 ± 0.03) × 10−31.25 ± 0.00071.300.990.00127−(1.2 ± 0.03) × 10−31.25 ± 0.000
1.072.590.970.11652−(5.9 ± 0.02) × 10−32.99 ± 0.00069.151.000.13277−(6.7 ± 0.03) × 10−33.00 ± 0.000
8.072.980.970.04316−(4.3 ± 0.01) × 10−22.89 ± 0.00366.621.000.03185−(5.4 ± 0.02) × 10−23.10 ± 0.003
16.067.190.960.12365−(1.1 ± 0.04) × 10−18.65 ± 0.00665.181.000.07008−(1.1 ± 0.06) × 10−18.76 ± 0.006
20.066.680.990.10806−(1.3 ± 0.02) × 10−14.44 ± 0.00860.981.000.08624−(1.6 ± 0.05) × 10−15.00 ± 0.008
6.000.0168.600.990.00012−(1.0 ± 0.02) × 10−41.02 ± 0.00061.690.990.00011−(1.3 ± 0.00) × 10−41.02 ± 0.000
0.0669.520.970.00030−(3.6 ± 0.00) × 10−41.06 ± 0.00067.690.970.00064−(3.9 ± 0.04) × 10−41.06 ± 0.000
0.170.160.970.00072−(7.0 ± 0.01) × 10−41.13 ± 0.00064.271.000.00050−(8.7 ± 0.04) × 10−41.13 ± 0.000
0.269.660.970.00111−(1.3 ± 0.03) × 10−31.25 ± 0.00065.310.990.00125−(1.5 ± 0.03) × 10−31.25 ± 0.000
1.071.610.970.11489−(5.8 ± 0.02) × 10−32.82 ± 0.00067.380.990.14344−(7.2 ± 0.03) × 10−33.01 ± 0.000
8.076.490.970.04143−(3.7 ± 0.02) × 10−22.91 ± 0.00363.961.000.03639−(5.8 ± 0.00) × 10−23.08 ± 0.003
16.070.980.960.14023−(9.0 ± 0.01) × 10−27.68 ± 0.00660.690.990.10329−(1.2 ± 0.00) × 10−19.54 ± 0.006
20.067.680.990.14243−(1.3 ± 0.02) × 10−14.52 ± 0.00858.861.000.11489−(1.7 ± 0.04) × 10−15.13 ± 0.008
Without additions0.0163.890.970.00028−(6.5 ± 0.01) × 10−51.01 ± 0.000
0.0663.980.960.00077−(3.7 ± 0.04) × 10−41.06 ± 0.000
0.165.750.980.00082−(6.4 ± 0.03) × 10−41.09 ± 0.000
0.266.770.970.00190−(1.3 ± 0.04) × 10−31.22 ± 0.000
1.063.560.960.13237−(6.5 ± 0.04) × 10−32.79 ± 0.000
8.060.880.960.11588−(6.3 ± 0.02) × 10−22.83 ± 0.003
16.052.140.960.28795−(1.3 ± 0.02) × 10−16.53 ± 0.006
20.053.760.970.27690−(1.8 ± 0.04) × 10−13.57 ± 0.008
Abbreviation as in Table 1.
Table
Table 4. Correlation coefficients between thiamine hydrochloride or thiamine pyrophosphate stability and peroxide value. The Anisidine Value and Protection Factor of AGCG and caffeine.
Table 4. Correlation coefficients between thiamine hydrochloride or thiamine pyrophosphate stability and peroxide value. The Anisidine Value and Protection Factor of AGCG and caffeine.
Concentration of EGCG or Caffeine [mg/100 g]EGCG or CaffeineCorrelation Coefficients between Thiamine Hydrochloride Stability and Value of Antioxidant Activity
Peroxide ValueAnisidine ValueProtection Factor
Thiamine Hydrochloride
Without Additions−0.930 ****−0.970 ****0.929 ****
0.5 mgEGCG−0.901 ****−0.947 ****0.945 ****
caffeine−0.922 ****−0.939 ****0.886 ***
1.0 mgEGCG−0.908 ****−0.949 ****0.931 ****
caffeine−0.884 ***−0.886 ***0.904 ****
2.0 mgEGCG−0.949 ****−0.984 ****0.989 ****
caffeine−0.761 ***−0.750 ***0.778 ***
3.0 mgEGCG−0.947 ****−0.950 ****0.978 ****
caffeine−0.431 **−0.397 *0.574 **
4.0 mgEGCG−0.908 ****−0.927 ****0.930 ****
caffeine−0.278 *−0.245 *0.355 *
5.0 mgEGCG−0.880 ***−0.890 ***0,892 ***
caffeine−0.261 *−0.231 *0.360 **
6.0 mgEGCG−0.780 ***−0.801 ***0,804 ***
caffeine−0.440 **−0.423 **0.274 *
Thiamine Pyrophosphate
Without Additions−0.940 ****−0.992 ****0.991 ****
0.5 mgEGCG−0.981 ****−0.947 ****1.000 ****
caffeine−0.922 ****−0.939 ****0.936 ****
1.0 mgEGCG−0.998 ****−0.990 ****1.000 ****
caffeine−0.884 ***−0.886 ***0.904 ****
2.0 mgEGCG−0.999 ****−0.984 ****0.999 ****
caffeine−0.761 ***−0.750 ***0.778 ***
3.0 mgEGCG−0.998 ****−0.990 ****0.998 ****
caffeine−0.431 **−0.397 *0.574 **
4.0 mgEGCG−0.998 ****−0.987 ****0.998 ****
caffeine−0.278 *−0.245 *0.355 *
5.0 mgEGCG−0.858 ***−0.860 ***0.861 ***
caffeine−0.261 *−0.231 *0.360 **
6.0 mgEGCG−0.812 ****−0.803 ***0.808 ****
caffeine−0.400 **−0.403 **0.278 *
**** linear relationship very strong; *** linear relationship significant; ** linear relationship moderate; * linear dependence weak; NS no linear relationship at: p ≤ 0.05; n = 14.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Piechocka, J.; Szymandera-Buszka, K. Thiamine in Lipid Systems vs. the Antioxidant Activity of Epigallocatechin Gallate and Caffeine. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094644

AMA Style

Piechocka J, Szymandera-Buszka K. Thiamine in Lipid Systems vs. the Antioxidant Activity of Epigallocatechin Gallate and Caffeine. Sustainability. 2021; 13(9):4644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094644

Chicago/Turabian Style

Piechocka, Justyna, and Krystyna Szymandera-Buszka. 2021. "Thiamine in Lipid Systems vs. the Antioxidant Activity of Epigallocatechin Gallate and Caffeine" Sustainability 13, no. 9: 4644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094644

APA Style

Piechocka, J., & Szymandera-Buszka, K. (2021). Thiamine in Lipid Systems vs. the Antioxidant Activity of Epigallocatechin Gallate and Caffeine. Sustainability, 13(9), 4644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094644

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop