What Affects the Production Technology of Labor-Intensive Agricultural Industries in the Context of Labor Aging? An Empirical Study Based on the Garlic Production in Lanling
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. The Research on the Impact of Aging of Agricultural Labor Force
2.2. Quantitative Research on Agricultural Production Technical Efficiency
2.3. Production Technical Efficiency Research Tool
3. Theoretical Analysis
4. Methods and Data
4.1. Data Envelopment Analysis and Econometric Model
4.2. Data
5. Results and Discussion
- (1)
- The impact of "farmer’s age" on the efficiency of planting production technology.
- (2)
- The influence of family characteristic variables.
- 1)
- “Annual household income” has a significant positive impact on comprehensive technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, and scale efficiency. The reason for this may be that if the annual household income is high, more funds are invested in planting, and auxiliary agricultural machinery can be purchased to help farmers with planting production and improve planting efficiency.
- 2)
- "The number of laborers aged 60 and over in the household labor force" has a significant negative impact on pure technical efficiency and comprehensive technical efficiency. This shows that the positive effects of the aging labor force in terms of experience, skills, and agricultural production specificity cannot resist the negative effects of the decline in physical strength and lack of energy caused by the aging labor force. The labor force over 60 years old has a low understanding and acceptance of new technology and knowledge, and the learning ability is limited; the greater the labor force, the lower the technical efficiency. The aging labor force is weak in anti-risk ability, strong in conservative consciousness, relatively insufficient in energy, and unwilling to expand the scale of operations, thus unable to obtain scale returns, so it has a negative impact on scale efficiency.
- (3)
- The influence of garlic planting characteristic variables.
- 1)
- The "number of plots" has a significant negative impact on scale efficiency. This shows that the degree of arable land fragmentation has a certain negative impact on farmers’ arable land input behavior and then affects farmers’ output benefit expectations and is not conducive to the improvement of farmers’ agricultural production technical efficiency.
- 2)
- This is also the same as the research results of scholars Tian Hongyu et al. (2019) [9].
- 3)
- "Number of garlic varieties" has a positive effect on scale efficiency. Inconsistent with the previous assumptions, the more varieties of garlic planted, the larger the planting scale will be. According to the theory of economies of scale, the planting scale efficiency increases. Different kinds of garlic have different maturity periods. Planting a variety of garlic according to different maturity periods can increase the output value of garlic in the same planting time. Therefore, the more garlic varieties, the higher the scale efficiency.
- 4)
- The number of acres of garlic planted has a negative impact on the comprehensive technical efficiency and pure technical efficiency. Under the established technical efficiency, the higher the number of acres planted, the lower the technical efficiency. Because garlic planting is still artificially planted now, under the existing technology, the more acres of garlic planting area, the higher the labor input, the lower the technical efficiency.
- (4)
- Further analysis of the inflection point of each efficiency score.
6. Conclusions and Policy Implications
- (1)
- The high degree of aging of the agricultural labor force in Lanling County, Shandong, is mainly due to the rapid urbanization process and the rapid development of the economic level which leads to the transfer of young and middle-aged agricultural labor force to non-agricultural sectors. With the birth rate remaining unchanged, the problem of the aging of the agricultural labor force has become prominent.
- (2)
- According to the efficiency value analysis obtained by the DEA model, it is found that the older the garlic grower is, the lower the production technology efficiency value; the different education levels will affect the garlic production efficiency value; the greater the garlic technology training times per year, the higher the production technology efficiency, but training more than three times will be negatively correlated with the efficiency of production technology; the technical efficiency of garlic production was affected by different health degrees; the higher the health level, the higher the production efficiency of garlic planting; the more varieties of garlic planted, the greater the negative effect on the technical efficiency of garlic production was observed.
- (3)
- According to regression calculations, seven factors, such as education level, health level, number of planting plots, cadre or not, the number of garlic varieties, the amount of training, and the age of the respondents, have not shown a significant impact. The number of laborers over 60 in the household, the number of acres of garlic planting, and the annual income of the farmer households: These three factors have a significant impact. The number of years of education of farmers does not reflect its significant factor because the farmers’ garlic planting mainly relies on empirical planting, which is not highly correlated with the level of education, and it is difficult to affect the technical efficiency of garlic planting. The higher the number of acres of garlic planted, and insufficient labor input will reduce the efficiency of garlic planting. The more laborers in the family over the age of 60, the weaker the physical energy of laborers will be than that of young laborers. Therefore, the more efficient the technical efficiency of garlic planting for farmers is lower. The higher the annual family income of farmers, the higher the cost of garlic planting. They purchase agricultural machinery to assist garlic planting to promote the technical efficiency of garlic planting.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- The World Bank. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.65UP.TO.ZS?end=2019&locations=CN&start=1985&view=chart (accessed on 9 May 2021).
- National Bureau of Statistics of China. Available online: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2020/indexch.htm (accessed on 9 May 2021).
- Li, M.; Sicular, T. Aging of the labor force and technical efficiency in crop production. China Agric. Econ. Rev. 2013, 5, 342–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Li, Y. Analysis and reflect on the problem about ageing labor engaged in agricultural production: Based on the second national agricultural census statistics in China. Issues Agric. Econ. 2009, 6, 61–66. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, X.; Zhong, F. Impact of the aging of rural population on grain production: An analysis based on fixed observation point data in rural areas. Chin. Rural. Econ. 2012, 7, 29–39. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, X.; Zhong, F. The impact of population aging on crop production: Based on the analysis of wheat and cotton crops. Issues Agric. Econ. 2013, 2, 36–43. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, B.; Deng, H. An empirical analysis on the impact of the aging of agricultural labor force on farmland use efficiency: Based on the fixed observation point data in rural Zhejiang province. Chin. Rural. Econ. 2012, 4, 15–25. [Google Scholar]
- Thiede, B.C.; Brown, D.L.; Sanders, S.R.; Glasgow, N.; Kulcsar, L.J. A Demographic Deficit? Local Population Aging and Access to Services in Rural America, 1990–2010. Rural. Sociol. 2017, 82, 44–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Smailes, P.; Griffin, T.; Argent, N. Demographic Change, Differential Ageing, and Public Policy in Rural and Regional Australia: A Three-State Case Study. Geogr. Res. 2014, 52, 229–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toossi, M.A. Century of Change: A century of change: The U.S. labor force, 1950–2050. Mon. Labor Rev. 2002, 125, 15–28. [Google Scholar]
- Despotovic, A.; Joksimovic, M.; Jovanovic, M. Impact of demographic changes on agricultural development in Montenegro. Ekon. Poljopr. Econ. Agric. 2015, 62, 613–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lindh, T.; Malmberg, B. Age structure effects and growth in the OECD, 1950–1990. J. Popul. Econ. 1999, 12, 431–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, X.; Zuo, Z. Analysis on rural households’ selection of production technology and technical efficiency in the traditional agricultural areas. Agrotech. Econ. 2015, 1, 42–53. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, C.; Wang, J.; Chen, Q.; Zhu, M. Research on the Measurement of China’s Corn Production Technical Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors—Based on the Empirical Study of Provincial Panel Data from 1995 to 2015. World Agric. 2018, 8, 139–145. [Google Scholar]
- Saiyut, P.; Bunyasiri, I.; Sirisupluxana, P.; Mahathanaseth, I. The impact of age structure on technical efficiency in Thai agriculture. Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci. 2019, 40, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awudu, A.; Richard, E. Technical efficiency during economic reform in Nicaragua: Evidence from farm household survey data. Econ. Syst. 2001, 25, 113–125. [Google Scholar]
- Qiao, Z.; Huo, X.; Zhang, B. The impact of agricultural labor aging on productivity of labor-intensive agricultural products: An empirical analysis based on 745 apple farmer households of Shaanxi and Gansu province. Econ. Surv. 2018, 35, 73–79. [Google Scholar]
- Fried, H.O.; Tauer, L.W. The Aging, U.S. Farmer: Should We Worry. In Advances in Efficiency and Productivity; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 391–407. [Google Scholar]
- Bashir, M.K.; Ali, A. Estimation of economic and production efficiency of potato production in central Punjab, Pakistan. Custos E Agronegocio Line 2021, 17, 2–23. [Google Scholar]
- Hakim, R.; Haryanto, T. Technical efficiency among agricultural households and determinants of food security in East Java, Indonesia. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anser, M.K.; Ali, M.; Anwar, F.; Usman, M. Subjective age and job satisfaction: A moderated mediation model of job burnout and chronological age. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Monchuk, D.C.; Chen, Z.; Bonaparte, Y. Explaining production inefficiency in China’s agriculture using data envelopment analysis and semi-parametric bootstrapping. China Econ. Rev. 2010, 21, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, K.; Hasan, S.S.; Goswami, R. Techno-economic and environmental assessment of different rice-based cropping systems in an inceptisol of West Bengal, India. J. Clean Prod. 2018, 205, 350–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, X.; Liu, Q.; Peng, X. Spatial club convergence of regional energy efficiency in China. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 51, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aslam, M.S.; Xue, P.H.; Aslam, M.S.; Xue, P.H. Assessment of rice and wheat production efficiency based on data envelopment analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 38522–38534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, Z.L.; Li, X.D. Technical Efficiency of Chemical Fertilizer Use and Its Influencing Factors in China’s Rice Production. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sapkota, M.; Joshi, N.P. Factors Associated with the Technical Efficiency of Maize Seed Production in the Mid-Hills of Nepal: Empirical Analysis. Int. J. Agron. 2021, 2021, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mezgebo, G.K.; Mekonen, D.G.; Gebrezgiabher, K.T. Do smallholder farmers ensure resource use efficiency in developing countries? Technical efficiency of sesame production in Western Tigrai, Ethiopia. Heliyon 2021, 7, e07315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angon, E.; Bragulat, T. Key factors affecting the technical efficiency of bee farms in the province of La Pampa (Argentina): A two-stage DEA approach. Revista De La Facultad De Ciencias Agrararias 2021, 53, 150–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, J.; Zeng, Y.; Wu, B. Labor endowments and production and management decisions of rural households in poverty-stricken areas. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2013, 5, 135–142. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, J.; Rozelle, S. Technological change: Rediscovering the engine of productivity growth in China’s rural economy. J. Dev. Econ. 1996, 49, 337–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, W.; Wan, G. Technical efficiency and its determinants in China’s grain production. J. Prod. Anal. 2000, 13, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chavas, J.P.; Petrie, R.; Roth, M. Farm household production efficiency: Evidence from the Gambia. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2005, 87, 160–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mwalupaso, G.E.; Wang, S.; Rahman, S.; Alavo, E.J.P.; Tian, X. Agricultural information and technical efficiency in maize production in Zambia. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yan, J.; Chen, C.; Hu, B. Farm size and production efficiency in Chinese agriculture: Output and profit. China Agric. Econ. Rev. 2019, 11, 20–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z. Age difference in labor productivity and Lewis turning point. China Rural. Econ. 2011, 08, 12–21. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, H.; Feng, X. Land fragmentation and rice production technology efficiency. J. S. China Agric. Univ. 2019, 04, 68–79. [Google Scholar]
- Alvarez, A.; Arias, C. Technical efficiency and farm size: A conditional analysis. Agric. Econ. 2004, 30, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, F.; Zhang, C.; Luo, Y.; Qiu, H. Impact of farmers’ planting experience on technical efficiency: Micro evidence from maize-producing households in four provinces in China. J. Agrotech. Econ. 2015, 5, 12–21. [Google Scholar]
- Seymour, G. Women’s empowerment in agriculture: Implications for technical efficiency in rural Bangladesh. Agric. Econ. 2017, 48, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, H.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Q. Research on ageing of rural labour force and efficiency loss of rice production: Based on the perspectives of social service. Chin. Popul. Sci. 2014, 3, 53–65. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, D.; Wen, L. Does the aging and feminization of rural labor force reduce grain production efficiency? A comparative analysis between the North and South China based on the stochastic frontier method. Agrotech. Econ. 2016, 2, 32–44. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Z.; Maierdan, T.; Wang, Y. Impact of the aging of rural labor force on agricultural technical efficiency: The empirical study based on the CHARLS2011. Soft Sci. 2014, 28, 130–134. [Google Scholar]
Year | Garlic Planting Area (ha) | Garlic Production (hundred million kg) | Total Output Value of Garlic (hundred million yuan) | Cash Crops Planting Area (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 21,333.33 | 3.26 | 17.43 | 7.16 |
2019 | 22,000 | 3.25 | 17.66 | 7.17 |
2020 | 23,533.33 | 6.947 | 18.58 | 7.18 |
Variable Name | Meaning and Assignment | Mean | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|---|
Labor input index | |||
Land input | Actual garlic planting area of farmers | 4.37 | 2.85 |
Material capital investment | Garlic seed + Agricultural film + Fertilizer + Pesticide + Labor Irrigation (CNY 10,000) | 1.46 | 1.13 |
Labor input | labor input (everyone a day) | 18.54 | 8.76 |
Farmer output indicators | |||
Total output value of garlic and garlic sprouts | Garlic and garlic sprout income (CNY 1000) | 2.95 | 2.21 |
Basic characteristics of farmers | |||
Farmer’s age | Calculated by actual age | 52.861 | 10.899 |
Years of education of farmers | actual years of education | 8.930 | 2.828 |
Basic family characteristics | |||
Number of people over 60 in the family | actual number of people over 60 years old in the household | 0.817 | 1.072 |
Farmers’ health | Very good = 5 good = 4 normal = 3 bad = 2 worse = 1 | 3.750 | 0.849 |
Village cadre | 1 = yes, 0 = no | 0.217 | 0.412 |
Family income | actual annual income | 1.188 | 1.416 |
Planting characteristics | |||
Planting acres | actual number of acres of garlic planted | 4.373 | 2.855 |
Number of garlic varieties | actual number of garlic varieties grown | 1.206 | 0.491 |
Number of plots | actual number of planted plots | 3.049 | 2.469 |
other | |||
Amount of technical training | actual number of training sessions per year | 0.706 | 1.068 |
Item | (Model I) Explained Variable: TE | (Model II) Explained Variable: PTE | (Model III) Explained Variable: SE |
---|---|---|---|
Farmer’s age | (0.28) 0.0003 | (−0.07) −0.0001 | (0.37) 0.0004 |
Years of education of farmers | (−0.85) −0.0034 | (−1.56) −0.0082 | (0.38) 0.0015 |
Number of garlic varieties | (−1.18) −0.0282 | (−1.86) −0.0575 * | (0.13) 0.0029 |
Amount of technical training | (0.32) 0.0035 | (−0.88) −0.0122 | (0.77) 0.0078 |
Farmers’ health | (0.35) 0.0047 | (−1.11) −0.0193 | (1.20) 0.0152 |
Number of plots | (−1.16) −0.0065 | (1.26) 0.0094 | (−3.81) −0.0203 *** |
Number of people over 60 in the family | (−2.29) −0.0261 ** | (−2.60) −0.0384 ** | (−0.48) −0.0052 |
Planting acres | (−4.95) −0.0368 *** | (−7.13) −0.0691 *** | (0.53) 0.0039 |
Village cadre | (0.02) 0.0004 | (0.51) 0.0185 | (0.28) 0.0075 |
Family income | (7.45) 0.0678 *** | (4.61) 0.0550 *** | (7.26) 0.0659 ** |
Likelihood/Chi-square test statistic | 77.512883/59.47 | 13.470424/64.18 | 89.422101/119.35 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sui, F.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, S. What Affects the Production Technology of Labor-Intensive Agricultural Industries in the Context of Labor Aging? An Empirical Study Based on the Garlic Production in Lanling. Sustainability 2022, 14, 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010048
Sui F, Yang Y, Zhao S. What Affects the Production Technology of Labor-Intensive Agricultural Industries in the Context of Labor Aging? An Empirical Study Based on the Garlic Production in Lanling. Sustainability. 2022; 14(1):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010048
Chicago/Turabian StyleSui, Fujia, Yinsheng Yang, and Shizhen Zhao. 2022. "What Affects the Production Technology of Labor-Intensive Agricultural Industries in the Context of Labor Aging? An Empirical Study Based on the Garlic Production in Lanling" Sustainability 14, no. 1: 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010048
APA StyleSui, F., Yang, Y., & Zhao, S. (2022). What Affects the Production Technology of Labor-Intensive Agricultural Industries in the Context of Labor Aging? An Empirical Study Based on the Garlic Production in Lanling. Sustainability, 14(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010048