A Study on Conformity Appeal Attributes and Social Contagion of Beauty-Focused One-Person Media in Sustainable E-Commerce
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background and Hypotheses
2.1. One-Person Media
2.2. Conformity Appeal Attributes of Beauty-Focused One-Person Media
2.3. Relationship between Conformity Appeal Attributes and Social Conformity of Beauty-Focused One-Person Media
2.4. Relationship between Social Conformity, Collaborative Innovation Networks, and Information Diffusion of Beauty-Focused One-Person Media
3. Research Method and Procedure
3.1. Research Model and Hypotheses
3.2. Measurement Tools
3.3. Data Collection and Analysis
4. Research Findings and Discussions
4.1. Demographic Characteristics of the Research Sample
4.2. Reliability and Validity Tests
4.3. Confirmatory Factor Analysis
4.4. Research Hypothesis Testing
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Goldenberg, J.; Han, S.; Lehmann, D.R.; Lee, J.; Ohk, K.Y. Local Neighborhoods as Early Predictors of Innovation Adoption; 2010 MSI Working Paper Series; Columbia Business School: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heal, G.; Kunreuther, H. Social reinforcement: Cascades, entrapment, and tipping. Am. Econ. J. 2010, 2, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hung, A.A.; Plott, C.R. Information cascades: Replication and an extension to majority rule and conformity rewarding institutions. Am. Econ. Rev. 2001, 91, 1508–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cha, M.; Mislove, A.; Adams, B.; Gummadi, K. Characterizing Social Cascades in Flickr. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Online Social Networks, WOSN’09, Seattle, WA, USA, 17–22 August 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Sastry, N.; Yoneki, E.; Crowcroft, J. Buzztraq: Predicting Geographical Access Patterns of Social Cascades Using Social Networks. In Proceedings of the Second ACM EuroSys Workshop on Social Network Systems, Nuremberg, Germany, 1–3 April 2009; pp. 39–45. [Google Scholar]
- Culotta, A. Maximizing Cascades in Social Networks: An Overview; Technical Report; University of Massachusetts: Amherst, MA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, Z.K.; Ahn, H.Y. Open collaboration business strategy. Entrue J. Inform. Tech. 2013, 12, 33–43. [Google Scholar]
- Lakhani, K.R.; Lifshitz-Assaf, H.; Tushman, M.L. Open Innovation and Organizational Boundaries: The Impact of Task Decomposition and Knowledge Distribution on the Locus of Innovations; HBS Working Paper, 12-057. SSRN Electron. J. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wellman, B.; Frank, K. Network capital in a multi-level world: Getting support in personal communities. In Social Capital: Theory and Research; Lin, N., Cook, K., Burt, R., Eds.; Aldine De Gruyter: Hawthorne, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Koh, M.J.; Youn, S.M. Investigation on the business model of multi-channel network of online platform. Intern. Telecomm. Pol. Rev. 2016, 23, 59–94. [Google Scholar]
- Yoon, H.G.; Song, H.J.; Park, S.B.; Park, S.Y. A Translation-based Knowledge Graph Embedding Preserving Logical Property of Relations. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, San Diego, CA, USA, 12–17 June 2016; pp. 907–916. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, W.R. A study on global unifying trend in broadcasting platform and MCN—Focused on exploration of breakthrough and support in overseas Korean broadcasting company. J. Basic Des. Art 2016, 17, 423–435. [Google Scholar]
- Korea Creative Content Agency. Possibility Through Changes in Fashion Distribution Platforms; KOCCA Focus: 17-07; Korea Creative Content Agency: Seoul, Korea, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, K.Y. A study on the development direction of the beauty creator in the one-man-media. Treat. Plast. Med. 2017, 20, 29–35. [Google Scholar]
- Sung, H.M.; Chung, J.S. Wang Hong and K-beauty industry in the era of personal media. Rev. Ind. Manag. 2017, 30, 61–80. [Google Scholar]
- Park, S.Y.; Kim, J.M. Effects of male consumers’ lifestyle on the use of fashion/beauty one-person media. J. Basic Des. Art 2017, 18, 235–244. [Google Scholar]
- Seok, B.R.; Kim, H.B. Effects of motivation to use YouTube beauty channels as one-person media on channel evaluation, product attitude, and purchasing intention. Korean J. Advert. Public Relat. 2019, 21, 168–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kauffman, R.J.; Li, X. Payoff Externalities, Informational Cascades and Managerial incentives: A Theoretical Framework for IT Adoption Herding. In Proceedings of the 2003 INFORMS Conference on Information Systems and Technology (CIST), Atlanta, GA, USA, 18–19 October 2003; Bharadwaj, A., Narasimhan, S., Santhanam, R., Eds.; [Google Scholar]
- Huang, J.H.; Chen, Y.F. Herding in online product choice. Psych. Mark. 2006, 23, 413–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barringer, M.; Milkovich, G. A theoretical exploration of the adoption and design of flexible benefit plans: A case of human resource innovation. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1998, 23, 305–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanneman, R.A.; Riddle, M. Introduction to Social Network Methods; University of California: Riverside, CA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.; Ham, C.; Kim, M. Why people pass along online video advertising: From the perspectives of the interpersonal communication motives scale and the theory of reasoned action. Int. J. Advert. 2013, 13, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bampo, M.; Ewing, M.T.; Mather, D.R.; Stewart, D. The effects of the social structure of digital networks on viral marketing performance. Inform. Syst. Res. 2008, 19, 273–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.S.; Kim, J.H. Determinants of career outcomes from the perspective of social embeddedness: Structural relationship with network resources and LMX, and gender differences. Korean Pub. Admin. Rev. 2020, 54, 67–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jun, D.K.; Rhee, E.Y. Transactions: The influence of reference group on the adolescents' behavior of fashion brand conformity. J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text. 2006, 30, 1434–1444. [Google Scholar]
- Park, C.W.; Lee, S.B.; Kim, S.J. I use SNS, because you use SNS. The effect of social conformity on social network service stickiness. J. Inform. Technol. Serv. 2013, 12, 25–40. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, M.J.; Yoon, Y.M. Effect of multiple media use and social conformity on perceived credibility and sharing intention of online rumor. J. Public Relat. 2015, 19, 96–119. [Google Scholar]
- Pihlstrom, M.; Brush, G.J. Comparing the perceived value of information and entertainment mobile services. Psychol. Mark. 2008, 25, 732–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawler, E.J. An affect theory of social exchange. Am. J. Soc. 2001, 107, 321–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- David, B.; Turner, J.C. Majority and minority influence: A single process self-categorization analysis. In Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation; De Dreu, C.K.W., De Vries, N.K., Eds.; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2001; pp. 91–121. [Google Scholar]
- Crandall, C.S.; Eshleman, A.; O’Brien, L.T. Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. J. Pers. Soc. Psych. 2002, 82, 359–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wood, W. Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2000, 51, 539–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jeong, I.K.; Kim, Y.S. Impact of ‘Datgeul’ of online media on public opinion: An examination of perception of public opinion and third person effect. Korean J. Comm. Stud. 2006, 50, 302–327. [Google Scholar]
- Sunstein, C.R. On Rumors: How Falsehoods Spread, Why We Believe Then, What Can Be Done; Farrar, Straus and Giroux: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Pisano, G.P.; Vergati, R. What kind of collaboration is right for you? Harv. Bus. Rev. 2008, 86, 78–86. [Google Scholar]
- Holstein, W.J. Hotbeds of Innovation; Strategy+Business, Booz & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Moon, Y. Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. J. Consum. Res. 2000, 26, 323–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, C.W.; Lessing, V.P. Students and housewives: Differences in susceptibility to reference group influences. J. Consum. Res. 1977, 4, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gronroos, C. Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Mark. Theory 2011, 11, 279–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, S.H.; Lee, D.H. Disclosure-liking effect by consumer’s self-disclosure toward the web site. Korea Mark. Rev. 2005, 20, 91–113. [Google Scholar]
- Gloor, P.A. Swarm Creativity: Competitive Advantage through Collaborative Innovation Networks; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 1–212. [Google Scholar]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common methods biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacKenzie, S.B.; Podsakoff, P.M. Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. J. Retail. 2012, 88, 542–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, W.W.; Kim, M.S.; Jeong, S.M.; Huh, K.M. Causes and remedies of common method bias. Korean J. Manag. 2007, 15, 89–133. [Google Scholar]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; Organ, D.W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Manag. 1986, 12, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, T.M.; Miller, C.E. Communication networks in task-performing groups: Effects of task complexity, time pressure, and interpersonal dominance. Small Group Res. 2000, 31, 131–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.B.; Yang, J.S. A study on the relationship between group cohesiveness and organizational effectiveness. J. Human Res. Manag. Res. 2005, 12, 5–31. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, K.M.; Chung, Y.K. The role of social exchange relations and collective cohesion in the organizational civic behavior of local servants. Korean Pub. Adm. Quart. 2001, 13, 129–148. [Google Scholar]
- Leadbeater, C. We-Think: Mass Innovation, Not Mass Production, 2nd ed.; Profile Books: London, UK, 2009; pp. 1–304. [Google Scholar]
- Rhee, B.J. A study on the supply chain partnership for SCM—Focusing on apparel companies and outsourcing supplier. Res. J. Costume Cult. 2008, 16, 181–203. [Google Scholar]
- Ahn, J.S.; Lee, W.J. Effect of social conformity and individuals’ information processing tendencies on trust in rumor messages. J. Comm. Sci. 2011, 11, 296–320. [Google Scholar]
- You, C.K. A study on the utilization value of collective intelligence for creative design. Treat. Plast. Med. 2016, 19, 243–248. [Google Scholar]
- Li, D.; Brown, G.J.; Wetherbe, J.C. Why do internet users stick with a specific web site? A relationship perspective. Intern. J. Electr. Comm. 2006, 10, 105–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, M.; Jennings, N.R.; Leung, H. On agent-mediated electronic commerce. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Engin. 2003, 15, 985–1003. [Google Scholar]
- Yoon, W.A.; Kim, K.O. A scale development in the propensity of collectivism–individualism among Korean consumers. J. Consum. Stud. 2000, 11, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
Category | Person (%) | Category | Person (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Female | 604 (87.3) | Occupation | Office worker | 241 (34.7) |
Male | 90 (12.97) | Student | 227 (32.7) | ||
Age | 20s | 424 (61.1) | Homemaker | 103 (14.9) | |
30s | 221 (31.8) | Other | 84 (12.1) | ||
40s and older | 49 (7.1) | Unemployed | 39 (5.6) | ||
Education | University student/graduate | 461 (66.4) | Average Monthly Income | 3 million ≤ KRW < 5 million | 267 (38.5) |
High school graduate | 119 (17.1) | 1 million ≤ KRW < 3 million | 257 (37.0) | ||
Junior college student/graduate | 60 (8.6) | 5 million ≤ KRW < 7 million | 121 (17.4) | ||
Graduate student or higher | 54 (7.8) | KRW ≥ 7 million | 49 (7.1) | ||
Marital Status | Single | 511 (73.6) | Place of Residence | Seoul | 219 (31.6) |
Married | 183 (26.4) | Gyeonggi | 187 (26.9) | ||
Other | 288 (41.5) |
Variable | Item | Eigenvalue | Component | Variance | Cronbach’s α |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Information cascade | ‣ Reputation of shared information (objectivity and reliability) | 2.210 | 0.846 | 18.417 | 0.786 |
‣ Clustering of shared information | 0.838 | ||||
‣ Expressivity of shared information (level of understanding) | 0.828 | ||||
Utility value efficiency | ‣ Value completeness of information utilization | 2.152 | 0.842 | 17.936 | 0.735 |
‣ Situational timeliness of information utilization | 0.825 | ||||
‣ Accuracy of information utilization | 0.758 | ||||
Reference group influence | ‣ Utilitarian reference group influence | 1.880 | 0.810 | 15.666 | 0.777 |
‣ Value-expressive reference group influence | 0.805 | ||||
‣ Informational reference group influence | 0.725 | ||||
Subnetwork structure | ‣ Subnetwork activity (interaction) | 1.840 | 0.821 | 15.331 | 0.794 |
‣ Subnetwork connectivity (consciousness of kind) | 0.812 | ||||
‣ Subnetwork preference similarity | 0.754 |
Variable | Item | Eigenvalue | Component | Variance | Cronbach’s α |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Social imitation conformity | ‣ Personal need for use of surroundings | 2.752 | 0.877 | 30.576 | 0.799 |
‣ Personal utility for social information participation | 0.875 | ||||
‣ Personal use due to social issues | 0.780 | ||||
Social connection conformity | ‣ Sharing with participants as a routine | 1.841 | 0.832 | 20.451 | 0.760 |
‣ Actively exposing personal thoughts (experiences) | 0.823 | ||||
‣ Actively meeting participant needs | 0.813 | ||||
Social comparative conformity | ‣ Can express personal identity | 1.797 | 0.852 | 19.966 | 0.759 |
‣ A tool for expressing personal values | 0.828 | ||||
‣ Ease of expressing individuality | 0.782 |
Variable | Item | Eigenvalue | Component | Variance | Cronbach’s α |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cocreation | ‣ Synergy of interaction (collaboration) | 2.661 | 0.860 | 44.358 | 0.725 |
‣ Responsibility toward group contribution | 0.818 | ||||
‣ Openness in presenting personal opinions | 0.726 | ||||
Information | ‣ Intention to share the obtained beauty information | 1.522 | 0.870 | 25.374 | 0.821 |
diffusion | ‣ Willingness to recommend the obtained beauty information | 0.861 | |||
behavior | ‣ Word-of-mouth intention for the obtained beauty information | 0.843 |
Measurement Item | Unstandardized Coefficient | Standardized Coefficient | SE | CR | Construct Reliability | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conformity appeal attributes of beauty-focused one-person media | ||||||
Information cascade | ||||||
1 | 1.000 | 0.859 | - | - | 0.800 | 0.705 |
2 | 0.966 | 0.876 | 0.022 | 15.869 | ||
3 | 0.938 | 0.958 | 0.019 | 13.868 | ||
Utility value efficiency | ||||||
1 | 1.000 | 0.881 | - | - | 0.741 | 0.651 |
2 | 0.942 | 0.983 | 0.049 | 22.798 | ||
3 | 0.894 | 0.916 | 0.035 | 16.269 | ||
Reference group influence | ||||||
1 | 1.000 | 0.873 | - | - | 0.789 | 0.667 |
2 | 0.988 | 0.923 | 0.035 | 20.163 | ||
3 | 0.894 | 0.956 | 0.028 | 16.294 | ||
Subnetwork structure | ||||||
1 | 1.000 | 0.921 | - | - | 0.814 | 0.669 |
2 | 0.991 | 0.969 | 0.032 | 19.415 | ||
3 | 0.859 | 0.840 | 0.024 | 14.778 | ||
Social conformity | ||||||
Social imitation conformity | ||||||
1 | 1.000 | 0.894 | - | - | 0.811 | 0.681 |
2 | 0.969 | 0.985 | 0.020 | 16.599 | ||
3 | 0.817 | 0.792 | 0.013 | 10.941 | ||
Social connection conformity | ||||||
1 | 1.000 | 0.905 | - | - | 0.786 | 0.696 |
2 | 0.987 | 0.856 | 0.024 | 17.452 | ||
3 | 0.951 | 0.953 | 0.021 | 14.788 | ||
Social comparative conformity | ||||||
1 | 1.000 | 0.921 | - | - | 0.747 | 0.681 |
2 | 0.958 | 0.856 | 0.028 | 19.460 | ||
3 | 0.942 | 0.941 | 0.019 | 13.214 | ||
Cocreation | ||||||
1 | 1.000 | 0.992 | - | - | 0.735 | 0.642 |
2 | 0.924 | 0.902 | 0.028 | 21.083 | ||
3 | 0.800 | 0.840 | 0.018 | 13.765 | ||
Information diffusion behavior | ||||||
1 | 1.000 | 0.909 | - | - | 0.832 | 0.717 |
2 | 0.971 | 0.862 | 0.024 | 14.404 | ||
3 | 0.969 | 0.894 | 0.018 | 11.938 |
Concept | Goodness of Fit Index | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X2 | df | p-Value | GFI | AGFI | RMR | NFI | CFI | RMSEA | |
Study Model | 183.403 | 2 | 0.000 | 0.948 | 0.919 | 0.046 | 0.939 | 0.954 | 0.062 |
Type | Pathway | Estimate | SE | CR | p-Value | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1-1-1 | Information cascade | → | Social imitation conformity | 0.286 | 0.025 | 11.598 | 0.000 *** | Accepted |
H1-1-2 | Utility value efficiency | → | Social imitation conformity | 0.122 | 0.024 | 5.588 | 0.000 *** | Accepted |
H1-1-3 | Reference group influence | → | Social imitation conformity | 0.085 | 0.022 | 3.836 | 0.000 *** | Accepted |
H1-1-4 | Subnetwork structure | → | Social imitation conformity | 0.135 | 0.022 | 6.106 | 0.000 *** | Accepted |
H1-2-1 | Information cascade | → | Social connection conformity | 0.005 | 0.031 | 0.170 | 0.865 | Rejected |
H1-2-2 | Utility value efficiency | → | Social connection conformity | 0.003 | 0.028 | 0.114 | 0.909 | Rejected |
H1-2-3 | Reference group influence | → | Social connection conformity | 0.036 | 0.026 | 1.377 | 0.169 | Rejected |
H1-2-4 | Subnetwork structure | → | Social connection conformity | 0.085 | 0.026 | 3.265 | 0.011 * | Accepted |
H1-3-1 | Information cascade | → | Social comparative conformity | 0.054 | 0.032 | 1.768 | 0.098 | Rejected |
H1-3-2 | Utility value efficiency | → | Social comparative conformity | 0.004 | 0.029 | 0.151 | 0.880 | Rejected |
H1-3-3 | Reference group influence | → | Social comparative conformity | 0.101 | 0.027 | 3.732 | 0.000 *** | Accepted |
H1-3-4 | Subnetwork structure | → | Social comparative conformity | 0.060 | 0.027 | 2.210 | 0.027 * | Accepted |
H2-1 | Social imitation conformity | → | Cocreation | 0.133 | 0.047 | 2.863 | 0.004 ** | Accepted |
H2-2 | Social connection conformity | → | Cocreation | 0.205 | 0.045 | 4.584 | 0.000 *** | Accepted |
H2-3 | Social comparative conformity | → | Cocreation | 0.393 | 0.041 | 9.665 | 0.000 *** | Accepted |
H3 | Cocreation | → | Information diffusion behavior | 0.693 | 0.027 | 25.313 | 0.000 *** | Accepted |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kang, S.; Na, Y. A Study on Conformity Appeal Attributes and Social Contagion of Beauty-Focused One-Person Media in Sustainable E-Commerce. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6226. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106226
Kang S, Na Y. A Study on Conformity Appeal Attributes and Social Contagion of Beauty-Focused One-Person Media in Sustainable E-Commerce. Sustainability. 2022; 14(10):6226. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106226
Chicago/Turabian StyleKang, Sungmin, and Younkue Na. 2022. "A Study on Conformity Appeal Attributes and Social Contagion of Beauty-Focused One-Person Media in Sustainable E-Commerce" Sustainability 14, no. 10: 6226. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106226
APA StyleKang, S., & Na, Y. (2022). A Study on Conformity Appeal Attributes and Social Contagion of Beauty-Focused One-Person Media in Sustainable E-Commerce. Sustainability, 14(10), 6226. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106226