Organizational Innovativeness in the Circular Economy: The Interplay of Innovation Networks, Frugal Innovation, and Organizational Readiness
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Innovation Network and Organizational Innovativeness
2.2. Frugal Innovation as Mediator
2.3. Organizational Readiness as Moderator
2.4. Theoretical Framework
3. Methodology
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Data Collection
3.3. Measurement Instrument
3.4. Innovation Network
3.5. Frugal Innovation
3.6. Organizational Readiness
3.7. Organizational Innovativeness
3.8. Control Variables
4. Analysis and Results
4.1. Reliability and Validity
4.2. Descriptive Statistics
4.3. Hypothesis Testing
5. Discussion
5.1. Theoretical Contribution
5.2. Practical Implications
5.3. Limitations and Future Research Directions
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Variable | Items | Construct |
Innovation network | IN1 IN2 IN3 IN4 IN5 | Our company is responsible for market changes. Our company can make novel products faster than competitors. Our company’s innovation network can frequently launch and introduce the latest products to emerging markets. Our company’s innovation network has the ability to fulfil the demands of the customer. Our company's innovation network can support and introduce innovative business opportunities. |
Frugal innovation | FI1 FI2 FI3 FI4 FI5 FI6 FI7 FI8 |
our company frequently Paying attention to functionality. Our company always seeks out new solutions Our company enhances the durability of existing products and services. Our company offers suitable products at a reasonable price. Our company finds out new ways for reduction of cost in manufacturing processes. Our company adopts the latest strategies for the innovative product and services prices. Our company seeks out efficient solutions to meet customers’ needs at a reasonable price. Our company increases and improves partnership with other firms. |
Organizational readiness | OR1 OR2 OR3 OR4 OR5 OR6 | Some members of the company resist every kind of change. Particular members appreciate changes as they improve and increase outcomes. Some firm members slowly adopt changes. Some firms can modify procedures and policies to fulfil new conditions. Necessary changes should be implemented by management through a clear plan. Most staff members are ready to use new ideas. |
Organizational innovativeness | OI1 OI2 OI3 OI4 | The level at which the firm is responsible for the change in the market. The ability of the firm to design innovative products and services. The level of knowledge activities which encourage innovation in firm products. The level of firm resources allocated for designing innovation strategies that are directed toward innovativeness. |
References
- Subramanian, A.; Nilakanta, S. Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega 1996, 24, 631–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrisson, D.; Laberge, M. Innovation, identities and resistance: The social construction of an innovation network. J. Manag. Stud. 2002, 39, 497–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhola, K.; Ryding, S.O.; Salmenperä, H.; Busch, N.J. Exploiting the potential of public procurement: Opportunities for circular economy. J. Ind. Ecol. 2019, 23, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Landsperger, J.; Spieth, P.; Heidenreich, S. How network managers contribute to innovation network performance. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2012, 16, 1240009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linden, G.; Kraemer, K.L.; Dedrick, J. Who captures value in a global innovation network? The case of Apple’s iPod. Commun. ACM 2009, 52, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suárez-Eiroa, B.; Fernández, E.; Méndez-Martínez, G.; Soto-Oñate, D. Operational principles of circular economy for sustainable development: Linking theory and practice. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 214, 952–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arfaoui, N.; Le Bas, C.; Vernier, M.F.; Vo, L.C. Circular Economy Practices and Innovative Behaviors. Lessons from Empirical Research in the Chemical Industry; Electronic Working Paper Series; ESDES-Research Center, Lyon Catholic University: Lyon, France, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Domenech, T.; Bahn-Walkowiak, B. Transition Towards a Resource Efficient Circular Economy in Europe: Policy Lessons from the EU and the Member States. Ecol. Econ. 2019, 155, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, H.K. An inventory of organizational innovativeness. Technovation 1998, 19, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, X.; Fang, L.; Zeng, S. Collaborative innovation network and knowledge transfer performance: A fsQCA approach. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 5210–5215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amidon, D.M. The Innovation SuperHighway; Routledge: London, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edquist, C. Systems of innovation perspectives and challenges. Afr. J. Sci. Technol. Innov. Dev. 2010, 2, 14–45. [Google Scholar]
- Levänen, J.; Hossain, M.; Wierenga, M. Frugal innovation in the midst of societal and operational pressures. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 347, 131308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiwari, R.; Herstatt, C. Frugal Innovation: A Global Networks’ Perspective. Die Unternehm. 2012, 66, 245–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bedi, H.S.; Vij, S. Antecedents and Consequences of Frugal Innovation—A Conceptual Model. In Indian Management: Proceeding of International Conference on Indian Management. Thapar University; Ghuman, K., Sharma, A., Garg, A., Eds.; Bloomsbury: New Delhi, India, 2016; pp. 253–269. [Google Scholar]
- Sommer, L.P.; Heidenreich, S.; Handrich, M. War for talents—How perceived organizational innovativeness affects employer attractiveness. R&D Manag. 2017, 47, 299–310. [Google Scholar]
- Klimas, P. Cooperation and Organizational Innovativeness within Innovation Networks. In Proceedings of the XXV ISPIM Conference—Innovation for Sustainable Economy & Society, Dublin, Ireland, 8–11 June 2014; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Soni, P.; Krishnan, R.T. Frugal innovation: Aligning theory, practice, and public policy. J. Indian Bus. Res. 2014, 6, 29–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albert, M. Sustainable frugal innovation-The connection between frugal innovation and sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 237, 117747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prabhu, J. Frugal innovation: Doing more with less for more. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2017, 375, 20160372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehman, W.E.; Greener, J.M.; Simpson, D.D. Assessing organizational readiness for change. J. Substain. Abus. Treat. 2002, 22, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Arnett, D.B.; Hou, L. Using external knowledge to improve organizational innovativeness: Understanding the knowledge leveraging process. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2016, 31, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leenders, R.T.A.; Kratzer, J.; Van Engelen, J.M. Innovation team networks: The centrality of innovativeness and efficiency. Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organ. 2007, 4, 459–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, S.C.; Chiang, C.Y.; Chu, C.Y.; Wang, Y.B. The study of social capital, organizational learning, innovativeness, intellectual capital, and performance. J. Hum. Resour. Adult Learn. 2006, 2, 64–71. [Google Scholar]
- Blichfeldt, H.; Knudsen, M.P. Measuring Manufacturing Innovativeness. In Proceedings of the 17th International Continuous Innovation Network Conference: Innovation and Tradition: Combining the Old and the New, Turin, Italy, 11–13 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Farnese, M.L.; Livi, S. How reflexivity enhances organizational innovativeness: The mediation role of team support for innovation and individual commitment. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 2016, 14, 525–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hite, J.M.; Williams, E.J.; Hilton, S.C.; Baugh, S.C. The Role of Administrator Characteristics on Perceptions of Innovativeness among Public School Administrators. Educ. Urban Soc. 2006, 38, 160–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheney, G.; Block, B.L.; Gordon, B.S. Perceptions of innovativeness and communication about innovations: A study of three types of service organizations. Commun. Q. 1986, 34, 213–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parida, V.; Pesämaa, O.; Wincent, J.; Westerberg, M. Network capability, innovativeness, and performance: A multidimensional extension for entrepreneurship. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2017, 29, 94–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nassani, A.A.; Sinisi, C.; Mihai, D.; Paunescu, L.; Yousaf, Z.; Haffar, M. Towards the Achievement of Frugal Innovation: Exploring Major Antecedents among SMEs. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suvinen, N. Individual actors building an innovation network. In The Social Dynamics of Innovation Networks; Routledge: London, UK, 2014; pp. 166–182. [Google Scholar]
- Mvulirwenande, S.; Wehn, U. Analysing frugal innovation incubation programmes: A case study from the water sector. Prometheus 2020, 36, 95–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piazza, M.; Mazzola, E.; Abbate, L.; Perrone, G. Network position and innovation capability in the regional innovation network. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2019, 27, 1857–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawson, B.; Samson, D. Developing innovation capability in organisations: A dynamic capabilities approach. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2001, 5, 377–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kollmann, T.; Kuckertz, A.; Breugst, N. Organizational readiness and the adoption of electronic business: The moderating role of national culture in 29 European countries. ACM SIGMIS Database DATABASE Adv. Inf. Syst. 2009, 40, 117–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nordin, N. The influence of leadership behavior and organizational commitment on organizational readiness for change in a higher learning institution. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 2012, 13, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hameed, N.S.S.; Salamzadeh, Y.; Rahim, N.F.A.; Salamzadeh, A. The impact of business process reengineering on organizational performance during the coronavirus pandemic: Moderating role of strategic thinking. Foresight 2021. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, B.; Sivakumar, K.; Evans, K.R.; Zou, S. Effect of customer participation on service outcomes: The moderating role of participation readiness. J. Serv. Res. 2015, 18, 160–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shafi, M.Q.; Raza, A.; Bajwa, A.H.; Gul, N. Impact of Paternalistic Leadership on Organizational Readiness for Change: Mediating Role of Employee Engagement and Moderating Role of Islamic Work Ethics. J. Islam. Bus. Manag. 2021, 11, 126–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsaad, A.K.; Mohamad, R.; Ismail, N.A. The moderating role of power exercise in B2B E-commerce adoption decision. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 130, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Trott, C.D.; Weinberg, A.E.; Sample McMeeking, L.B. Prefiguring sustainability through participatory action research experiences for undergraduates: Reflections and recommendations for student development. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dima, A.; Bugheanu, A.-M.; Dinulescu, R.; Potcovaru, A.-M.; Stefanescu, C.A.; Marin, I. Exploring the Research Regarding Frugal Innovation and Business Sustainability through Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, B.W. Original equipment manufacturers (OEM) manufacturing strategy for network innovation agility: The case of Taiwanese manufacturing networks. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2004, 42, 943–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossetto, D.E.; Borini, F.M. A proposed instrument for measuring frugal innovation: The first stage of development a new scale. In Academy of Management Proceedings; Academy of Management: Briarcliff Manor, NY, USA, 2017; Volume 2017, p. 16956. [Google Scholar]
- Haffar, M.; Ozcan, R.; Radulescu, M.; Isac, N.; Nassani, A.A. Hegemony of Network Capabilities, Frugal Innovation and Innovation Strategies: The Innovation Performance Perspective. Sustainability 2021, 14, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Claiborne, N.; Auerbach, C.; Lawrence, C.; Schudrich, W.Z. Organizational change: The role of climate and job satisfaction in child welfare workers’ perception of readiness for change. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2013, 35, 2013–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, S.H. Human capital, organizational learning, network resources and organizational innovativeness. Total. Qual. Manag. 2007, 18, 983–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pirtea, M.G.; Noja, G.G.; Cristea, M.; Panait, M. Interplay between environmental, social and governance coordinates and the financial performance of agricultural companies. Agric. Econ. 2021, 67, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panait, M.; Petrescu, M.G. Quality management and social responsibility in the context of sustainable development. Industrija 2015, 43, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Items | FL | Cronbach’s Alpha | CR | AVE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Innovation Network | 05 | 0.76–0.86 | 0.82 | 0.93 | 0.72 |
Frugal Innovation | 08 | 0.76–0.87 | 0.84 | 0.92 | 0.74 |
Organizational Readiness | 06 | 0.74–0.87 | 0.86 | 0.94 | 0.73 |
Organizational Innovativeness | 04 | 0.72–0.83 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.75 |
Variable | Mean | SD | Alpha | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Business Age | 3.05 | 1.05 | 0.86 | 1.00 | |||||||
2 | Business Size | 1.27 | 0.32 | 0.84 | 0.116 ** | 1.00 | ||||||
3 | Respondent Experience | 1.87 | 0.42 | 0.81 | 0.215 ** | 0.86 * | 1.00 | |||||
4 | Respondent Education | 1.62 | 0.46 | 0.87 | −0.03 | 0.07 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
5 | Innovation Network | 3.74 | 0.48 | 0.80 | −0.02 | −0.18 | 0.01 | −0.10 | 1.00 | |||
6 | Frugal Innovation | 3.43 | 0.36 | 0.84 | 0.04 | −0.05 | 0.093 * | −0.02 | 0.164 ** | 1.00 | ||
7 | Organizational Readiness | 3.62 | 0.85 | 0.85 | −0.09 | −0.15 | −0.04 | 0.085 * | 0.247 ** | 0.347 ** | 1.00 | |
8 | Organizational Innovativeness | 1.23 | 0.63 | 0.82 | 0.03 | −0.12 | −0.05 | −0.12 | 0.320 ** | 0.269 ** | 0.365 ** | 1.00 |
Model | Hypothesis Description | β | F | T | Sig | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model No. 1 | Innovation Network→ Organizational Innovativeness | 0.32 | 16.065 | 0.148 | 0.000 | Accepted |
Model Detail | Data | Boot | Bias | SE | Lower | Upper | Sig |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFI→OI | 0.164 | 0.14 | 0.002 | 0.42 | 0.1230 | 0.2860 | 0.0000 |
Organizational Innovativeness | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Detail | Beta | T Value | Beta | T Value | Beta | T Value |
Step 1 | ||||||
Business age | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 1.34 | 0.01 | 0.22 |
Business size | 0.05 | 0.24 | 0.14 | 0.87 | 0.12 | 0.77 |
Respondent education | 0.12 | 0.26 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 1.02 | 1.32 |
Respondent experience | 0.14 | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.92 | 0.04 | 0.13 |
Step 2 | ||||||
IN | 0.32 * | 7.94 | 0.37 * | 3.42 | ||
OR | 0.22 * | 5.46 | 0.32 * | 4.48 | ||
Step 3 | ||||||
IN * OR | 0.28 ** | 2.26 | ||||
F | 6.18 ** | 17.46 * | 18.43 * | |||
R2 | 0.04 | 0.25 | 0.26 | |||
R2 | 0.24 | 0.02 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yousaf, Z.; Mihai, D.; Tanveer, U.; Brutu, M.; Toma, S.; Zahid, S.M. Organizational Innovativeness in the Circular Economy: The Interplay of Innovation Networks, Frugal Innovation, and Organizational Readiness. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116501
Yousaf Z, Mihai D, Tanveer U, Brutu M, Toma S, Zahid SM. Organizational Innovativeness in the Circular Economy: The Interplay of Innovation Networks, Frugal Innovation, and Organizational Readiness. Sustainability. 2022; 14(11):6501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116501
Chicago/Turabian StyleYousaf, Zahid, Daniela Mihai, Umair Tanveer, Mădălina Brutu, Smaranda Toma, and Sheikh Muhammad Zahid. 2022. "Organizational Innovativeness in the Circular Economy: The Interplay of Innovation Networks, Frugal Innovation, and Organizational Readiness" Sustainability 14, no. 11: 6501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116501
APA StyleYousaf, Z., Mihai, D., Tanveer, U., Brutu, M., Toma, S., & Zahid, S. M. (2022). Organizational Innovativeness in the Circular Economy: The Interplay of Innovation Networks, Frugal Innovation, and Organizational Readiness. Sustainability, 14(11), 6501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116501