Does Knowledge Evolution Matter? Reflection on Alpine Tribes Industry, Development, and Transformation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Analyzing the Characteristics and Features of Tribes under KBD
2.1. The Characteristics of Tribal Industry and Knowledge Development
2.2. The Characteristics of KBD
2.3. The Relation between KBD and Tribal Industries
2.3.1. KBD for Tribes
2.3.2. Development of Tribal Industries based on Knowledge
- Developing cooperation: Enabling members to participate in the decision-making process proactively and ensuring fair treatment, thus building consciousness of ownership and responsibility.
- Developing subsidies and collaborations: Seeking to maximize the market profits and surplus, as well as improving welfare, protection, and subsidies.
- Technical training: Helping to train the tribes, communities, and organizations for entrepreneurship to achieve the target, product positioning, and developmental opportunities.
- Industrial transformation: Inheriting the tribal culture and helping the tribes to gel by integrating internal opinions and communications with the characteristics of tribal culture.
3. Site Selection and Current Status
3.1. Research Scope and Site
3.2. Reason for Site Selection
3.3. Current Status of the Industries
3.3.1. The Development of the Primary Industry: Agriculture
“Young aboriginals went out for studying and returned after graduation. Land levelling began in March every year. Planting began in April or May and harvesting was from July to October. Most of the young aboriginals went out to work in the daytime and came back at night.”—Indicated by interviewee A
3.3.2. Hot Spring Industry
“Connecting the attractions with hot spring. There were confrontations between the tribe and the hotel industry in the hot spring area. Hoped there would be collaborations.”—Interviewees A and C
3.3.3. Tourism Industry
“Integrating attractions with ecotourism. The tribe provides route guidances and tribal accommodations for experience.”—Interviewees A and B
3.4. Current Status of Public Facilities
3.4.1. Tongkong Church-Center of Tribal Belief and Spirit
3.4.2. Sport Court and Community Center
3.4.3. Exhibition Center
“The exhibition center for tribes was established by the Council of Agriculture, providing a space for selling tribal crops. However, the Han people took over the center after invading the area. Tribes wondered why the center became other’s as it was originally designed for the Bunun tribe.”—Interviewee A
3.5. The Structure of Social Organizations
3.5.1. The Social Class System
- (1)
- The Family
- (2)
- Presbyterian Polity
3.5.2. Tribal Organizations
4. Investigation of the Evolution and Difficulties of Industrial Development for Tungpu Daigaz
4.1. Agricultural Development: The Inconvenience in Transportation Obstructed Marketing Channels and Transformation of Produce Crops
“Considering the logistics, handicraft, and processing of agricultural products. Attracting tourists by advertising the attractions on social media.”—Interviewees C and D
“I think the startup that is most suitable for the 1st neighborhood of Tungpu is ecotourism and the processing of agricultural products.”—Interviewee B
4.2. Development of Local Tourism and the Hot Spring Industry: Featured Products and Added Value to Be Developed
“Developing tourism industry by volunteers, integrating tribal opinions, recruiting volunteers to create featured tribal activities.”—Interviewees B, C, and D
“Time conflict for tourism and going to the church. There are 10 guides now, but the ecotourism holds only once a year.”—Interviewee A
4.3. Traffic and Environment Not Favored for Developing Tourism Industry
“Inheritance of traditional culture is significant. It will be perfect if that comes along with making money.”—Interviewees C and D
“Agriculture dominates in the tribe. Some people would go for part-time or risky jobs, such as logistics in the mountain.”—Interviewee C
4.4. The Quality of Tribal Agriculture to Be Promoted to the Next Level
5. Conclusions: Investigation of Industrial Knowledge Construction for Tungpu Daigaz Using KBD
5.1. Making Policies for the Development of the Tribal Industry by Participating in the Planning
“The elders used to lead the industrial development for the tribe. Industrial transformation may occur but requires some time to integrate and break in the thoughts of the elders and young aboriginals.”—Interviewees A and C
5.1.1. The Hub for the Industries: Connecting Tungpu Hot Spring with the Tribal Resources
5.1.2. Enhancing Sustainable Development through Unique Tribal Knowledge, Mountain Guides, and the Hunting Culture of Tungpu Daigaz
5.2. New Hunting Knowledge—The Identity of Tribal Knowledge Industry and Talent Cultivation: Co-Management of Tribal Self-Media
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sia, E.-H.L. Crafting Aboriginal Nations in Taiwan: The Presbyterian Church and the Imagination of the Aboriginal National Subject. Asian Stud. Rev. 2018, 42, 356–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asheim, B.; Coenen, L.; Vang, J. Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: Sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 2007, 25, 655–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sia, E.-H.L. Crafting the Taiwanese Nation: Exclusivist and Inclusivist Theses of the Post-war Taiwanese Nationalism. Taiwan Self Vs. Other 2016, 47, 56–84. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, F.-L. Economic Situation and the Possibility of Constructing Local Culture Industries in Aboriginal Tribes: A Case Study of Taoyuan, Hsinchu and Miaoli Areas. J. State Soc. 2008, 4, 2–41. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, Y.Z. Learning, Culture and Knowledge of Aboriginal. J. Educ. Natl. Chang. Univ. Educ. 2006, 9, 171–188. [Google Scholar]
- Ranjitha, B. Creating Environmental Awareness For Tribal School Children. Environment 2014, 3, 174–176. [Google Scholar]
- Muhanna, E. Sustainable tourism development and environmental management for developing countries. Probl. Perspect. Manag. 2006, 4, 14–30. [Google Scholar]
- Herath, G. Research methodologies for planning ecotourism and nature conservation. Tour. Econ. 2002, 8, 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Melón, M.; Gómez-Navarro, T.; Acuña-Dutra, S. A combined ANP-delphi approach to evaluate sustainable tourism. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2012, 34, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, T.-S.; Pan, S.-C.; Lin, H.-P. Development, Innovation, and Circular Stimulation for a Knowledge-Based City: Key Thoughts. Energies 2021, 14, 7999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, T.-S.; Yu, C.-W.; Chia, P.-C. Knowledge exchange types and strategies on the innovation interactions between KIBS firms and their clients in Taiwan. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2018, 5, 1534527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, T.S.; Pan, S.C.; Chia, P.C. Shaping of the innovation milieu of taiwan’s machine tool industry from the perspective of innovation input and talent evolution. J. Archit. Plan. 2019, 20, 115–137. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, H.-P.; Hu, T.-S. Knowledge interaction and spatial dynamics in industrial districts. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carrillo, F.J. Capital cities: A taxonomy of capital accounts for knowledge cities. J. Knowl. Manag. 2004, 8, 28–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Laszlo, K.C.; Laszlo, A. Fostering a sustainable learning society through knowledge-based development. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2007, 24, 493–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watan, K.; Angel, C.; Gu, W.-H. The Development of Indigenous Industry in Taiwan. J. Taiwan Indig. Stud. Assoc. 2015, 5, 171–193. [Google Scholar]
- Crevoisier, O.; Jeannerat, H. Territorial knowledge dynamics: From the proximity paradigm to multi-location milieus. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2009, 17, 1223–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tapsell, P.; Woods, C. Social entrepreneurship and innovation: Self-organization in an indigenous context. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2010, 22, 535–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson, J.; Doherty, B. The diverse world of social enterprise: A collection of social enterprise stories. Int. J. Soc. Econ. 2006, 33, 361–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrucka, P.M.; Bickford, D.; Bassendowski, S.; Goodwill, W.; Wajunta, C.; Yuzicappi, B.; Yuzicappi, L.; Hackett, P.; Jeffery, B.; Rauliuk, M. Positive leadership, legacy, lifestyles, attitudes, and activities for Aboriginal youth: A wise practices approach for positive Aboriginal youth futures. Int. J. Indig. Health 2016, 11, 177–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chang, H.-M.; Hung, C.-H.; Chou, C.-L. A study of Alishan indigenous tribal tourism development in Taiwan. Asian J. Environ. Ecol. 2018, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burton-Jones, A. The knowledge supply model: A framework for developing education and training in the new economy. Educ. Train. 2001, 43, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cox, P.A. Will tribal knowledge survive the millennium? Science 2000, 287, 44–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hu, T.-S.; Lin, C.-Y.; Chang, S.-L. Technology-based regional development strategies and the emergence of technological communities: A case study of HSIP, Taiwan. Technovation 2005, 25, 367–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meher, R. Globalization, displacement and the livelihood issues of tribal and agriculture dependent poor people: The case of mineral-based industries in India. J. Dev. Soc. 2009, 25, 457–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsieh, H.-N.; Chen, C.-M.; Wang, J.-Y.; Hu, T.-S. Knowledge-intensive business services as knowledge intermediaries in industrial regions: A Comparison of the Hsinchu and Tainan metropolitan areas. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2015, 23, 2253–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.-M.; Lu, D.-J. The cultural and ecological impacts of aboriginal tourism: A case study on Taiwan’s Tao tribe. SpringerPlus 2014, 3, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Adom, K. Beyond the marginalization thesis: An examination of the motivations of informal entrepreneurs in sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from Ghana. Int. J. Entrep. Innov. 2014, 15, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meramveliotakis, G.; Manioudis, M. History, Knowledge, and Sustainable Economic Development: The Contribution of John Stuart Mill’s Grand Stage Theory. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Past | Now | Future | |
---|---|---|---|
Mode of Knowledge Transmission | Delivering in a single way | Deliver in a single way→Interactions | Interacting in a reversible way |
Knowledge Type | Verbal (Tacit) | Verbal (Tacit) Characterized (Explicit) | Verbal (Tacit) Characterized (Explicit) New Media |
Source of Knowledge | Opinion Leadership Presbyter Ruler (the Han/Government/Priest) Elder | Opinion Leadership Presbyter Ruler (the Han/Government/Priest) Elder Tribal Youth/Volunteer Feedback from Experience Self-Media Platform (Social Interactions) |
Unit | Function of Knowledge | Description | Time to Execute |
---|---|---|---|
Tribe | Knowledge Translation | Emphasizing the independent operation and enhancing tourism development and managers for operation management in terms of funds and human resources. Agricultural development under contract; assisting in processing of agricultural products, food sanitation, and brand establishment, etc. Integrating the tourism industry with marketing, operation, and management, creating a cultural immersion trip on the cultural uniqueness. | Promoting in the short term |
Media/Self-Media or we media | Knowledge Transmission | Improving industrial marketing, human resources, research and development, finance, and information management (smart applications). Multiple participation and integration through knowledge transmission and operation management. Establishing organizations; expanding sales channels, marketing brands, and e-commerce applications; planning industrial tours; and integrating food, hotel, travel, shopping, and transportation to strengthen the industrial competitiveness and the added value. | Promoting in the middle to long term |
Government | Innovation Knowledge Creation | Monitoring the subsidy applications for agriculture transformation to organic or eco-friendly farming and product verification. Training, education, and industry counsel on and continuous monitoring of the environmental and social issues generated from tribal development. | Continuous promotion |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pan, S.-C.; Hu, T.-S.; Chia, B.-Z.; Chang, S.-L.; Lin, H.-P. Does Knowledge Evolution Matter? Reflection on Alpine Tribes Industry, Development, and Transformation. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6851. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116851
Pan S-C, Hu T-S, Chia B-Z, Chang S-L, Lin H-P. Does Knowledge Evolution Matter? Reflection on Alpine Tribes Industry, Development, and Transformation. Sustainability. 2022; 14(11):6851. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116851
Chicago/Turabian StylePan, Ssu-Chi, Tai-Shan Hu, Ben-Zin Chia, Su-Li Chang, and Hai-Ping Lin. 2022. "Does Knowledge Evolution Matter? Reflection on Alpine Tribes Industry, Development, and Transformation" Sustainability 14, no. 11: 6851. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116851
APA StylePan, S. -C., Hu, T. -S., Chia, B. -Z., Chang, S. -L., & Lin, H. -P. (2022). Does Knowledge Evolution Matter? Reflection on Alpine Tribes Industry, Development, and Transformation. Sustainability, 14(11), 6851. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116851