Next Article in Journal
Impact of the Global Megatrends, COVID-19, and Digital Economy on Professional Career Management Transformation in Asian Countries
Previous Article in Journal
Techno-Economic Comprehensive Review of State-of-the-Art Geothermal and Solar Roadway Energy Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Climate Change and Silvopasture: The Potential of the Tree and Weather to Modify Soil Carbon Balance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Understory Clearing in Open Grazed Mediterranean Oak Forests: Assessing the Impact on Vegetation

1
Centro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
2
Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(17), 10979; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710979
Submission received: 30 June 2022 / Revised: 20 August 2022 / Accepted: 22 August 2022 / Published: 2 September 2022

Abstract

:
Over recent years, rural abandonment and climate change have challenged grazed wooded landscapes in Mediterranean mountain regions. Fire hazard management procedures such as grazing, prescribed burning, or mechanical clearing must be adjusted to the new socioeconomic and environmental situation and according to the context and circumstances of each territory. This study contributes to adjusting vegetation management techniques in response to low grazing pressure by evaluating the combined effect of mechanical clearing and grazing on the structural and floristic dynamics of understory vegetation in the open-grazed Mediterranean oak forests of northern Portugal. To this end, three treatments were established: mechanical clearing with grazing, mechanical clearing without grazing, and grazing without clearing (the control). The floristic inventories were carried out using the point quadrat method, and the structure was evaluated using line transects. Herbaceous biomass was determined by destructive methods. This study shows that mechanical vegetation clearing effectively reduces phytovolume and, thus, fire hazards. However, for its effects to endure, it must be combined with subsequent grazing, which does not always occur. No consistent pattern was found in the floristic dynamics of the shrub-grassland mosaic (species richness and diversity) related to shrub-clearing or grazing over the short term (24 months).

1. Introduction

Wood pastures can assume a wide diversity of functions and configurations, from scattered trees in a pasture to compact forests whose understory and natural regeneration are heavily grazed [1]. In this sense, any woody landscape where livestock grazing coexists with woody vegetation (trees and shrubs) could be referred to as wood pasture. Plieninger et al. [2] point out three main types across Europe: pastures with cultivated trees (mainly olive, chestnut, and almond groves), pastures with sparse trees (frequently riparian trees and hedges), and open woodlands where they occur mainly as holm oak and cork oak. Wood pasture has been one of Europe’s oldest land use types [3] since the Neolithic [4,5].
Wood pastures have recently received increasing scientific attention across Europe, where they occur over a large area. They also occupy large areas in the study region where the provisioning, regulating, and supporting of ecosystem services, as well as cultural services, are essential to the well-being of local communities [6]. They cover about 4.7% of European countries (EU 27), 10.8% of the Mediterranean biogeographical region, and 16.4% of Portugal, the European country among the 27 that has the most significant area covered by pasture [2].
Despite their socio-cultural and biodiversity value and economic relevance [7,8,9], wood pastures in Mediterranean regions have been threatened due to land-use change, including both intensification and abandonment of agriculture [10,11,12,13]. Land-use intensification is associated with simplifying a wood pasture into either pasture without trees or annual croplands, which has occurred over the last half-century as the result of the mechanization of agriculture [14,15]. Bergmeier and Roellig [16] point out that in addition to land-use intensification, some of the most critical threats to wood pastures are the decline of old trees, the lack of tree regeneration, and the encroachment of woody vegetation.
Regardless of their configuration, wood pastures result from long-term human use of natural forests and are heavily dependent on this type of management [17]. Therefore, today’s challenge for conserving woody grasslands is their anthropic nature and, thus, the need for specific day-to-day management [2]. Livestock grazing is the most influential and dominant management intervention which drives [2]. However, traditional pastoralism across Mediterranean Europe, mainly in the mountain and dry areas, is disappearing [18,19,20,21]. For example, cattle prevail over sheep in extensive pastoral systems in the Pyrenees, with herds on pasture for shorter periods, lower stocking densities, and less herding activity than before [22]. In other cases, extensive pastoralism has also been partially replaced by intensive production systems, with more extended stable periods and feeding with forage and concentrates [23]. In the dry regions of southern Portugal, it is common to replace sheep with cattle and replace native breeds with more productive non-native breeds and higher stocking densities [24,25]. Thus, the main challenge to preserving wood pastures is the low number of livestock and extensive systems currently observed in these regions [26,27].
Several techniques have been proposed to manage these human-disturbance-dependent ecosystems. The combination of prescribed burning and directed grazing has been suggested as a suitable method to restore ecosystems in areas with a history of fire and grazing [22,28]. Fire is considered a cost-effective management tool to prevent the successional change of grassland toward forest [29]. Nevertheless, this technique also has significant constraints relating to the appropriate conditions for application and the risk of fire escape [30,31]. Alternatively, some authors [32,33,34,35,36] have proposed mechanical clearing of shrub vegetation, alone or combined with guided grazing. However, mechanical treatments usually require relatively gentle terrain and are typically expensive [37,38]. In addition, extensive livestock farming has been used to prevent shrub encroachment by subsidizing grazing in specific locations, such as firebreaks and other strategic areas, to prevent and control the further spreading of fires [39]. However, several studies show that grazing alone, with current stocking densities in the Mediterranean mountains, is not enough to prevent shrub encroachment [40,41]. Bailey et al. [42] suggested target grazing as a vegetation management tool. These authors point out that targeted grazing differs from traditional grazing in that it aims to provide defoliation or trampling to achieve specific vegetation management objectives.
Different interventions for fire-prone areas in high conservation value sites, such as those in the Natura 2000 network, have been recommended to achieve the common targets of biodiversity conservation and fire prevention [43]. Against this backdrop, and within the scope of the European project Open2preserve (https://open2preserve.eu/en/), mechanical clearing and extensive livestock grazing were applied in this study to understand how this combined technique could help to manage these kinds of wood pastures, especially with fire-hazard reduction goals and the conservation of shrub-grassland mosaic biodiversity in mind. This research aims to evaluate the combined effect of mechanical cleaning and grazing on the structural and floristic dynamics of understory vegetation in an open Mediterranean forest in northern Portugal. In this way, herbaceous biomass, vegetal cover, phytovolume, and species richness and diversity of Shannon–Wiener (H’) were estimated over time.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study was undertaken in northeast Portugal (41°32′ N, 7°02′ W), on a site of community interest (SIC PT CON0043-Romeu), located at an altitude of about 500 m.a.s.l. and representative of open Mediterranean forests (Figure 1). It has a Mediterranean climate, with an average annual temperature of 14.3 °C and total annual precipitation of 508.6 mm (data for 1971–2000). The vegetation is dominated by an open mixed sclerophyllous forest of Quercus faginea, Q. rotundifolia, and Q. suber, with a moderately dense shrub layer comprised mainly of Cistus ladanifer, Cytisus multiflorus, and Lavandula stoechas. The soils are classified as Distric Leptosols derived from schists.
The experimental area covers 43,246 m2 whose understory shrubs were mechanically cleared in May 2019 (Clearing + Grazing), except for a 906 m2 control plot (No Clearing + Grazing); it also includes another cleared 400 m2 plot that was fenced to exclude grazing (Clearing + No grazing). The area was subjected to an intermittent grazing regime by a flock of 150 sheep from December 2019 to June 2021. In the first six months of monitoring, the flock was in the area for about 52 days and 88 h; in the second one, 97 days and 169 h; and in the third period (December 2020 to June 2021), 89 days and 132 h [44].

2.2. Field Sampling, Vegetation Surveys, and Data Collection

Vegetation surveys were conducted from 2019 to 2021, according to the approach followed.

2.2.1. Vegetation Structural Parameters

We used the line interception method [45] to evaluate the structural parameters of vegetation. We established four 20 m wide transects in each treatment and recorded the length occupied by each plant. In the case of herbaceous plants, no differentiation was made between them. The average height of each shrub was also recorded. Assessments were made during five periods (late spring 2019, 2020, and 2021 and winter 2019 and 2020). We estimated the plant cover by growth form (shrubs and herbaceous plants) and the phytovolume by shrub species from the data recorded above.
The herbaceous biomass was evaluated by cutting and weighing 0.25 m2 at the end of spring 2020 and 2021. Three replicates were used in the first sampling period and five in the second.

2.2.2. Floristic Inventories

We used the point-quadrat procedure [46] to record the presence of individual plants along the four 20 m transects in each treatment. We identified and recorded all the plant species that touched a narrow pin placed vertically at 20 cm intervals. The floristic survey was carried out in May 2021 for the three treatments and in May 2019 for the control (No Clearing + Grazing). From the data recorded, we determined the species richness (total number of species in the transects—100 points per transect) and estimated the diversity through the Shannon diversity index. The floristic evaluations were performed in May 2021 for the three treatments and also in May 2019 for the control.

2.2.3. Calculus

The understory phytovolume was calculated, by shrub species, by multiplying the average height of the shrub by its canopy cover for each plant (Equation (1)); the phytovolume in each transect was obtained by summing the volumes of each plant.
Phytovolume (m3 ha−1) = % cover Sppi in each interception × height
where the canopy cover (area below the plant that covers the soil surface) was calculated by Equation (2):
%   c o v e r ( S p p A ) = ( t o t a l   d i s t a n c e   S p p A t o t a l   d i s t a n c e   o f   l i n e ) × 100
The Shannon–Wiener diversity index was calculated as follows:
H = i = 1 S p i × log 2 p i
where S is the total number of species and pi is the relative abundance of species i in the transect (measured as the frequency of that species in the transect divided by the summation of all the species’ frequencies in that transect).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was made from an analysis of variance (two-way ANOVA—Type III SS), considering sampling date and treatments as sources of variation. The Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference Test was carried out for subsequent pairwise comparisons (p < 0.05) if the ANOVA was significant. Means and standard error by groups (treatment and sampling date) were calculated. The statistical software package SYSTAT 12.0.9 was used for all these analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Plant Species Composition and Diversity

Plant species richness was significantly lower in the grazed plot after clearing (CL + G, mean ± SD: 30B ± 1.96) than in the plot cleared but not grazed (CL + NG, mean ± SD: 40.5A ± 2.90) and grazed without being cleared (NCL + G, mean ± SD: 42.5A ± 2.10, Figure 2). Similarly, plant species diversity (Shannon index) was also significantly lower in CL + G (mean ± SD: 2.250B ± 0.166; Figure 2) than CL + NG (mean ± SD: 2.718A ± 0.033) and NCL + G (mean ± SD: 2.740A ± 0.068). In both cases, no significant differences were found between years for the untreated plot. The variation of plant species richness and diversity between treatments did not show a consistent pattern with any of the effects studied (shrub-clearing and grazing). In addition, both parameters did not differ significantly between years in the case of the plot NCL + G. The lists of species found in the floristic inventories are shown in the Table S1 (supplementary material).

3.2. Structure

In general, the mechanical cutting treatment altered the vegetation structural variables, though the effects were not too persistent over time, particularly in the ungrazed plot. Herbaceous and shrub cover, and phytovolume, varied significantly between treatments (p < 0.001) and time since clearing (p < 0.01). However, no differences were found in plant cover, neither between treatments nor time since clearing, with an average value of 95.16%.
Herbaceous cover, on average, ranged from 53.71% for NCL + G and 83.90% for CL + G (Figure 3), showing a pattern of decrease over time, very noticeably in the plot treated by clearing without grazing. As expected, the percentage of shrub plant cover showed an opposite pattern, ranging on average between 39.85% for NCL + G and 9.53% for CL + G (Figure 3), being much smaller in the cleaned plots. However, 24 months after the shrub-cleared treatment, the ungrazed plot (mean ± SD: 29.94 ± 5.21%) showed a value approximately twice as high as the grazed one (mean ± SD: 14.63 ± 2.85%). In addition, it can be observed that the shrub cover evolution in the untreated plot was slow.
The understory phytovolume was the structural variable most sensitive to clearing and grazing effects. The post hoc test revealed that the means of the three treatments were significantly different, ranging on average between 280.17C ± 51.06 m3 ha−1 (Cl + G) and 4534.31A ± 476.52 m3 ha−1 (NCl + G), being much lower in the mechanical cutting plots than uncut ones. All plots showed increased phytovolume over time but at different rates (Figure 4). However, the temporal dynamics on the untreated plot were not significant. The woody plant layer of the treated plots without grazing (CL + NG) overgrew during the study period, reaching after 24 months since clearing the value of 2210.75 ± 481.92 m3 ha−1, approximately four and a half times the values of the grazed one (Cl + G).

3.3. Herbaceous Biomass

Herbaceous biomass varied significantly between treatments and years after clearing (p < 0.01). One year post-clearing, significant differences were observed between cleaned (CL + G mean ± SD: 118.41B ± 22.60 g m−2 and CL + NG mean ± SD: 94.91B ± 11.62 g m−2) and uncleaned plots (NCL + G mean ± SD: 234.71A ± 24.12 g m−2).
The herbaceous biomass increased between the first and the second year post-treatment in the plots under mechanical clearing. However, it was significantly higher in the ungrazed plot (mean ± SD: 264.10A ± 10.40 g m−2) in comparison with the other one (mean ± SD: 193.34C ± 16.05 g m−2). After two years, the plot without mechanical treatment showed a lower biomass value than the ungrazed plot (NCL + G. mean ± SD: 229.07B ± 9.20 g m−2). The three plots showed that biomass values significantly differed two years after shrub clearing. This suggests that mechanical clearing alone after two years does not affect the available herbaceous biomass; surprisingly, the grazed ones, even without previous treatment, have little effect on the available herbaceous biomass. The last plot showed similar values between years (mean ± SD: 234.71 ± 24.12 g m−2 and 229.07 ± 9.20 g m−2 in 2020 and 2021, respectively; Figure 5).

4. Discussion

This research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of extensive grazing by sheep to control woody understory in open Mediterranean forests after mechanical clearing. In doing so, it sought to increase knowledge on better management and conservation of this landscape type, particularly concerning fire risk reduction. Twenty-four months after mechanical clearing, the results showed lower plant richness and diversity in the grazed plot than in the others that had either not been cleared or been grazed without being previously cleared. This differs from previously published research [47,48,49,50,51]. Furthermore, our results do not allow us to identify any direct relationship between floristic traits and grazing or clearing shrub vegetation.
Peréz-Ramos et al. [52] studied the effect of shrub clearing of cork oak forests on understory herbaceous plant diversity. They found that the different diversity components were modified by the effect of shrub clearing practices, probably due to the new abiotic conditions resulting from structural changes in the shrub layer. According to these authors, shrub clearing increases species richness (α-diversity) and decreases the spatial heterogeneity in the studied cork oak forest herbaceous composition (β-diversity). On the other hand, they found that the impact of shrub clearing on diversity components was site-specific and depended on the forest structure, having found a higher species richness in the Open woodland sites and only negligible effects in the Closed forest ones.
Several reasons could contribute to the fact that the grazed plot after clearing had fewer species than those not grazed or grazed but not previously cleared, as evidenced by authors who studied the effect of fuel reduction on vegetation recovery and diversity. Overall, they describe similar effects of prescribed burning, clearing, or mastication on the time of vegetation recovery and species richness [48]. A large number of studies [43,48,53,54,55,56] have reported an increase in species richness after fuel load treatments. This is the case of Peréz-Ramos et al. [52], who found a more pronounced effect two years later in an open cork oak forest, or Silva et al. [43], who also described this effect for at least four years after prescribed burning in shrublands in central Portugal. In contrast, Fuentes et al. [57] found a reduction in species richness and diversity only during a short period after prescribed burning.
In short, species richness is due to the balance between local extinction and colonization [58], and their relationship can be affected by site-specific abiotic conditions (moisture, shade [59]) or be modified by tree-shade, composition, and herbaceous vegetation (perennial versus annual plants), and this was not considered in this study.
The results indicated that after 24 months, the clearing treatment was effective, with a substantially lower level of phytovolume than in the non-intervention plot; this effect persisted in the grazed plots, which aligns with research based on fuel load management by mechanical clearing [32,60,61,62,63,64]. However, the phytovolume values achieved in the short term (24 months) show the failure of mechanical clearing if grazing is not kept up [49,65]. Biomass accumulation, a key determinant of fire hazards, was rapid following vegetation disturbance, reflecting in part the persistence of the resprouters root system and the rapid recruitment of seedlings from the seed bank [53,63].
The results also show that grazing alone, i.e., without any prior action such as mechanical clearing, does not limit phytovolume, which is in line with results found in other Mediterranean regions [40,62,65,66,67]. In fact, there is research that contrasts with our results, showing that livestock themselves can control shrub regrowth. However, certain specific conditions are referred to, such as high stocking densities [68] in small areas or ecosystems dominated by grass and perennial herb fuels [69], but not in extensive Mediterranean mountain areas with the current numbers of livestock [62].
The present study is consistent with previous research on herbaceous cover increasing immediately after mechanical clearing [48,56,70]. We state that mechanical clearing followed by grazing can reduce fire hazards in the short term, which has been demonstrated in similar ecosystems in northern [62] and southern Spain [33] and France [71]. The Andalusian network of grazed fuel breaks consists of mechanical clearing followed by grazing, which extends clearance intervals from 10 to 12 years [72]; this is “targeted grazing” based on biomass reduction targets [73]. In the long term, the effectiveness of this combined technique allows the fuel loading level to be kept low by biomass consumption at levels previously determined as a target. The evaluation of the effectiveness of the combined technique of mechanical cleaning with grazing over the medium term (4–6 years) is therefore of significant interest.
Future research should focus on the grazing pressure in the area so that after mechanical clearing, understory control by grazing becomes sustainable. Together with an economic evaluation of such operations, this information could provide land managers with decision-making tools on the most appropriate control of fuel biomass to achieve their goals. On the other hand, the fact that higher phytovolume situations coincide with those of higher species richness and diversity also needs to be clarified.

5. Conclusions

This study shows that mechanical cutting treatment effectively reduces phytovolume and, therefore, fire hazards, but its effect was not too persistent over time, especially when not combined with grazing. No consistency was found in the relationship of shrub mosaic vegetation dynamics (species richness and diversity) to clearing or grazing, at least in the short term (24 months). However, there seems to be a tendency for species richness and diversity to be higher in the plots with higher phytovolume in the short term, which is worth investigating. Mitigating the conflict between biodiversity conservation and fire prevention in open Mediterranean forests is central to the management of Natura 2000 sites, which requires trade-offs in deciding on appropriate fuel management measures. Further studies are also needed to define the frequency of mechanical clearing and the intensity of grazing, adjusted to vegetation development in each situation. Only in this way can the objectives of fire risk reduction be reconciled with habitat management objectives for nature conservation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su141710979/s1, Table S1: List of plant species present in the floristic inventories.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C.; methodology, M.C., J.C., and J.P.C.; formal analysis, M.C., J.C., and J.P.C.; investigation, M.C., J.C., and J.P.C.; resources, M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.C.; writing—review and editing, J.C.; supervision, M.C.; project administration, M.C.; funding acquisition, M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the EU SUDOE, grant number SOE2/P5E0804, project OPEN2PRESERVE. This article was also supported by the FCT/MCTES Project CIMO (UIDB/00690/2020).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hartel, T.; Plieninger, T.; Varga, A. Wood-pastures in Europe. In Europe’s Changing Woods and Forests: From Wildwood to Cultural Landscapes; Kirby, K.J., Walkins, C., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2005; pp. 61–76. [Google Scholar]
  2. Plieninger, T.; Hartel, T.; Martín-López, B.; Beaufoy, G.; Bergmeier, E.; Kirby, K.; Montero, M.J.; Moreno, G.; Oteros-Rozas, E.; Van Uytvanck, J. Wood-pastures of Europe: Geographic coverage, social-ecological values, conservation management, and policy implications. Biol. Conserv. 2015, 190, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Forejt, M.; Skalos, J.; Pereponova, A.; Plieninger, T.; Votja, J.; Šantrůčkovád, M. Changes and continuity of wood-pastures in the lowland landscape in Czechia. Appl. Geogr. 2017, 79, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gómez-Sal, A. The ecological rationale and nature conservation value of extensive livestock systems in the Iberian Peninsula. In Examples of European Agri-Environmental Schemes and Livestock Systems and Their Influence on Spanish Cultural Landscapes; Bunce, R.G.H., Pérez-Soba, M., Elbersen, B.S., Prados, M.J., Andersen, E., Bell, M., Smeets, P.J.A.M., Eds.; ALTERRA: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 103–123. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dietre, B.; Reitmaier, T.; Walser, C.; Warnk, T.; Unkel, I.; Hajdas, I.; Lambers, K.; Reidl, D.; Haas, J.N. Steady transformation of primeval forest into subalpine pasture during the Late Neolithic to Early Bronze Age (2300−1700 BC) in the Silvretta Alps, Switzerland. Holocene 2020, 30, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Garrido, P.; Elbakidze, M.; Angelstam, P.; Plieninger, T.; Pulido, F.; Moreno, G. Stakeholder perspectives of wood-pasture ecosystem services: A case study from Iberian dehesas. Land Use Policy 2017, 60, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bergmeier, E.; Petermann, J.; Schroder, E. Geobotanical survey of woodpasture habitats in Europe: Diversity, threats and conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19, 2995–3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Oksuz, D.P.; Aguiar, C.A.S.; Tápia, S.; Llop, E.; Lopes, P.; Serrano, A.R.M.; Leal, A.I.; Correia, O.; Matos, P.; Rainho, A.; et al. The contribution of small shrubby patches to the functional diversity of wood-pastures. Acta Oecol. 2020, 108, 103626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rolo, V.; Roces-Diaz, J.V.; Torralba, M.; Kay, S.; Fagerholm, N.; Aviron, S.; Burgess, P.; Crous-Duran, J.; Ferreiro-Dominguez, N.; Graves, A.; et al. Mixtures of forest and agroforestry alleviate trade-offs between ecosystem services in European rural landscapes. Ecosyst. Serv. 2021, 50, 101318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Varela, E.; Olaizola, A.M.; Blasco, I.; Capdevila, C.; Lecegui, A.; Casasús, I.; Bernués, A.; Martín-Collado, D. Unravelling opportunities, synergies, and barriers for enhancing silvopastoralism in the Mediterranean. Land Use Policy 2022, 118, 106140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Roellig, M.; Costa, A.; Garbarino, M.; Hanspach, J.; Hartel, T.; Jakobsson, S.; Lindborg, R.; Mayr, S.; Plieninger, T.; Sammul, M. Post hoc assessment of stand structure across European Wood-pastures: Implications for land use policy. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 71, 526–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Azeda, C.; Guiomar, N.; Godinho, S.; Medeiros, J.P.; Pinto-Correia, T. The ambiguous role of agri-environment-climate measures in the safeguarding of High Nature Value Farming Systems: The case of the Montado in Portugal. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2021, 319, 107562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Costa, A.; Madeira, M.; Santos, J.L.; Plieninger, T.; Seixas, J. Fragmentation patterns of evergreen oak woodlands in Southwestern Iberia: Identifying key spatial indicators. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 133, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sato, C.F.; Wood, J.T.; Stein, J.A.; Crane, M.; Okada, S.; Michael, D.R.; Kay, G.M.; Florance, D.; Seddon, J.; Gibbons, P.; et al. Natural tree regeneration in agricultural landscapes: The implications of intensification. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 230, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Auer, A.; Maceira, N.; Nahuelhual, L. Agriculturisation and trade-offs between commodity production and cultural ecosystem services: A case study in Balcarce County. J. Rural Stud. 2017, 53, 88–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bergmeier, E.; Roellig, M. Diversity, Threats and Conservation of European Wood-pastures. In European Wood-Pastures in Transition: A Social-Ecological Approach; Hartel, T., Plieninger, T., Eds.; Earthscan/Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2014; pp. 19–38. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hartel, T.; Dorresteijn, I.; Klein, C.; Mathe, O.; Moga, C.I.; Ollerer, K.; Roellig, M.; von Wehrden, H.; Fischer, J. Wood-pastures in a traditional rural region of Eastern Europe: Characteristics, management and status. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 166, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Insausti, K.; Beldarrain, L.R.; LAvín, M.P.; Aldai, N.; Mantecón, Á.R.; Sáez, J.L.; Canals, R.M. Horse meat production in northern Spain: Ecosystem services and sustainability in High Nature Value farmland. Anim. Front. 2021, 11, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lasanta, T.; Nadal-Romero, E.; Arnáez, J. Managing abandoned farmland to control the impact of re-vegetation on the environment. The state of the art in Europe. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 52, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moreno, G.; Franca, A.; Pinto-Correia, M.T.; Godinho, S. Multifunctionality and dynamics of silvopastoral systems. Opt. Méditerranéennes 2014, 109, 421–436. [Google Scholar]
  21. Durán, M.; Canals, R.M.; Sáez, J.L.; Ferrer, V.; Lera-López, F. Disruption of traditional land use regimes causes an economic loss of provisioning services in high-mountain grasslands. Ecosyst. Serv. 2020, 46, 101200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. San Emeterio, L.; Múgica, L.; Ugarte, M.D.; Goicoa, T.; Canals, R.M. Sustainability of traditional pastoral fires in highlands under global change: Effects on soil function and nutrient cycling. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 235, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guadilla-Sáez, S.; Pardo-de-Santayana, M.; Reyes-García, V. The role of traditional management practices in shaping a diverse habitat mosaic in a mountain region of Northern Spain. Land Use Policy 2019, 89, 104235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Godinho, S.; Guiomar, N.; Machado, R.; Santos, P.; Sá-Sousa, P.; Fernandes, J.P.; Neves, N.; Pinto-Correia, T. Assessment of environment, land management, and spatial variables on recent changes in montado land cover in southern Portugal. Agrofor. Syst. 2016, 90, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Pinto-Correia, T.; Azeda, C. Public policies creating tensions in Montado management models: Insights from farmers’ representations. Land Use Policy 2017, 64, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Castro, M.; Ameray, A.; Castro, J.P. A new approach to quantify grazing pressure under Mediterranean pastoral systems using GIS and remote sensing. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2020, 41, 5371–5387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Castillo-García, M.; Alados, C.L.; Ramos, J.; Moret, D.; Barrantes, O.; Pueyo, Y. Understanding herbivore-plant-soil feedbacks to improve grazing management on Mediterranean mountain grasslands. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2022, 327, 107833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fuhlendorf, S.D.; Engle, D.M.; Kerby, J.; Hamilton, R. Pyric herbivory: Rewilding landscapes through the recoupling of fire and grazing. Conserv. Biol. 2009, 23, 588–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Thapa, S.K.; de Jong, J.F.; Hof, A.R.; Subedi, N.; Joshi, L.R. Fire and forage quality: Postfire regrowth quality and pyric herbivory in subtropical grasslands of Nepal. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 12, e8794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fernández, C.; Vega, J.A.; Fonturbel, T. Shrub resprouting response after fuel reduction treatments: Comparison of prescribed burning, clearing and mastication. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 117, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bayne, K.C.; Clifford, V.R.; Baillie, B.R.; Pearce, H.G. Fire as a Land Management Tool: Rural Sector Perceptions of Burn-off Practice in New Zealand. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 72, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Baeza, M.J.; Raventós, J.; Escarré, A.; Vallejo, V.R. The effect of shrub clearing on the control of the fire-prone species Ulex parviflorus. For. Ecol. Manag. 2003, 186, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ruiz-Mirazo, J.; Robles, A.B.; González-Rebollar, J.L. Two-year evaluation of fuelbreaks grazed by livestock in the wildfire prevention program in Andalusia (Spain). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 141, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lasanta, T.; Cortijos-López, M.; Errea, M.P.; Khorchani, M.; Nadal-Romero, E. An environmental management experience to control wildfires in the mid-mountain Mediterranean area: Shrub clearing to generate mosaic landscapes. Land Use Policy 2022, 118, 106147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mena, Y.; Ruiz-Mirazo, J.; Ruiz, F.A.; Castel, J.M. Characterization and typification of small ruminant farms providing fuelbreak grazing services for wildfire prevention in Andalusia (Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 544, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Martins, A.; Novais, A.; Santos, J.L.; Canadas, M.J. Experts’ multiple criteria evaluations of fuel management options to reduce wildfire susceptibility. The role of closer knowledge of the local socioeconomic context. Land Use Policy 2021, 108, 105580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. DiTomaso, J.M. Invasive weeds in rangelands: Species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci. 2000, 48, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fonseca, T.J.F.; Manso, F.C.S.T.; Martins, C.M.S.; Castro, M.M.F. A gestão florestal sustentável na prevenção do risco de incêndio: Silvicultura e pastoreio na redução da biomassa combustível. In Empreendedorismo e Inovação na Engenharia Florestal 3; Felsemburgh, C.A., Ed.; Atena Editora: Ponta Grossa, Brazil, 2001; pp. 54–71. [Google Scholar]
  39. Varela, E.; Górriz-Mifsud, E.; Ruiz-Mirazo, J.; López-i-Gelats, F. Payment for targeted grazing: Integrating local shepherds into wildfire prevention. Forests 2018, 9, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bartolomé, J.; Franch, J.; Plaixats, J.; Seligman, N.G. Grazing alone is not enough to maintain landscape diversity in the Montseny Biosphere Reserve. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2000, 77, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Álvarez-Martínez, J.; Gómez-Villar, A.; Lasanta, T. The use of goats grazing to restore pastures invaded by shrubs and avoid desertification: A preliminary case study in the Spanish Cantabrian Mountains. Land Degrad. Dev. 2016, 27, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bailey, D.W.; Mosley, J.C.; Estell, R.E.; Cibils, A.F.; Horney, M.; Hendrickson, J.R.; Walker, J.W.; Launchbaugh, K.L.; Burritt, E.A. Synthesis Paper: Targeted Livestock Grazing: Prescription for Healthy Rangelands. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 72, 865–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Silva, V.; Catry, F.X.; Fernandes, P.M.; Rego, F.C.; Bugalho, M.N. Trade-offs between fire hazard reduction and conservation in a Natura 2000 shrub-grassland mosaic. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2020, 23, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Castro, M.; Castro, J.P.; Pádua, L.; Castro, J. Regional Vegetation Monitoring Report of the Pilot Experiments; Open2preserve Projet; IPB: Bragança, Portugal, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  45. Canfield, R. Application of Line Interception Method in Sampling Range Vegetation. J. For. 1941, 39, 388–394. [Google Scholar]
  46. Daget, P.; Poissonet, J. Une Méthode d’Analyse Phytologique des Prairies’. Ann. Agron. 1971, 22, 5–41. [Google Scholar]
  47. Fuhlendorf, S.D.; Engle, D.M. Application of the fire-grazing interaction to restore a shifting mosaic on tallgrass prairie. J. Appl. Ecol. 2004, 41, 604–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fernández, C.; Vega, J.; Fonturbel, T. Does shrub recovery differ after prescribed burning, clearing and mastication in a Spanish heathland? Plant Ecol. 2015, 216, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bashan, D.; Bar-Massada, A. Regeneration dynamics of woody vegetation in a Mediterranean landscape under different disturbance-based management treatments. J. Appl. Ecol. 2017, 20, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lanta, V.; Mudrák, O.; Liancourt, P.; Bartoš, M.; Chlumská, Z.; Dvorský, M.; Pusztaiová, Z.; Münzbergová, Z.; Sebek, P.; Čížek, L.; et al. Active management promotes plant diversity in lowland forests: A landscape-scale experiment with two types of clearings. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 448, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gao, J.; Carmel, Y. A global meta-analysis of grazing effects on plant richness. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 302, 107072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pérez-Ramos, M.; Zavala, M.A.; Marañón, T.; Díaz-Villa, M.D.; Valladares, F. Dynamics of understorey herbaceous plant diversity following shrub clearing of cork oak forests: A five-year study. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 255, 3242–3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Clemente, A.S.; Rego, F.C.; Correia, O.A. Demographic patterns and productivity of post-fire regeneration in Portuguese Mediterranean maquis. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 1996, 6, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Perchemlides, K.A.; Muir, P.S.; Hosten, P.E. Responses of chaparral and oak woodland plant communities to fuel-reduction thinning in Southwestern Oregon. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 61, 98–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Calvo, L.; Tárrega, R.; De Luis, E. The dynamics of Mediterranean shrubs species over 12 years following perturbations. Plant Ecol. 2002, 160, 25–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fernández, C.; Vega, J.A. Shrub recovery after fuel reduction treatments in a gorse shrubland in northern Spain. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 166, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Fuentes, L.; Duguy, B.; Nadal-Sala, D. Short-term effects of spring prescribed burning on the understory vegetation of a Pinus halepensis forest in Northeastern Spain. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 610–611, 720–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Mac Arthur, R.H.; Wilson, E.O. The Theory of Island Biogeography, 2nd ed.; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2001; p. 224. [Google Scholar]
  59. Capitanio, R.; Carcaillet, C. Post-fire Mediterranean vegetation dynamics and diversity: A discussion of succession models. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 255, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ximenes, F.; Stephens, M.; Brown, M.; Law, B.; Mylek, M.; Schirmer, J.; Sullivan, A.; McGuffog, T. Mechanical fuel load reduction in Australia: A potential tool for bushfire mitigation. Aust. For. 2017, 80, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bates, J.D.; Svejcar, T.; Miller, R.; Davies, K.W. Plant Community Dynamics 25 Years After Juniper Control. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2017, 70, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lasanta, T.; Khorchani, M.; Pérez-Cabello, F.; Errea, P.; Sáenz-Blanco, R.; Nadal-Romero, E. Clearing shrubland and extensive livestock farming: Active prevention to control wildfires in the Mediterranean mountains. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 227, 256–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Casals, P.; Rios, A.I. Burning intensity and low light availability reduce resprouting ability and vigor of Buxus sempervirens L. after clearing. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 627, 403–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fick, S.E.; Nauman, T.W.; Brungard, C.C.; Duniway, M.C. What determines the effectiveness of Pinyon-Juniper clearing treatments? Evidence from the remote sensing archive and counter-factual scenarios. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 505, 119879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Calleja, J.A.; Escolà, M.; Carvalho, J.; Forcadell, J.M.; Serrano, E.; Bartolomé, J. Cattle Grazing Fails to Control Shrub Encroachment in Mediterranean Landscapes. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 72, 803–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ameray, A.; Castro, J.P.; Castro, M. Potential greenhouse gas emissions mitigation through increased grazing pressure: A case study in North Portugal. Carbon Manag. 2022, 13, 142–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Etienne, M.; Mas, I.; Rigolot, E. Combining techniques of fuel reduction for fuel-break maintenance in the French Mediterranean region. Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Forest Fire Research, Coimbra, Portugal, 21–24 November 1994; Viegas, D.X., Ed.; Universidade de Coimbra: Coimbra, Portugal, 1994; II, pp. 713–721. [Google Scholar]
  68. Torrano, L.; Valderrábano, J. Grazing ability of European black pine understorey vegetation by goats. Small Rumin. Res. 2005, 58, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Davies, K.W.; Wollstein, K.; Dragt, B.; O’Connor, C. Grazing management to reduce wildfire risk in invasive annual grass prone sagebrush communities. Rangelands 2022, 44, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Öllerer, K.; Varga, A.; Kirby, K.; Demeter, L.; Biró, M.; Bölöni, J.; Molnár, Z. Beyond the obvious impact of domestic livestock grazing on temperate forest vegetation—A global review. Biol. Conserv. 2019, 237, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Etienne, M. Aménagement de la forêt méditerranéenne contre les incendies et biodiversité. Rev. For. Fr. 2001, 53, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Varela-Redondo, E.; Calatrava, J.; Ruiz-Mirazo, J.; Jiménez, R.; González Rebollar, J.L. El pastoreo en la prevención de incendios forestales: Análisis comparado de costes evitados frente a medios mecánicos de desbroce de la vegetación. Pequeños Rumiantes 2008, 9, 12–20. [Google Scholar]
  73. Ruiz-Mirazo, J.; Robles-Cruz, A.B.; Ramos-Font, M.E.; González-Rebollar, J.L. Las áreas pasto-cortafuegos como experiencia de selvicultura preventiva en los espacios forestales y agroforestales Mediterráneos: 1. Diseño. In Producciones Agroganaderas: Gestión Eficiente y Conservación del Medio Natural; Osoro, K., Argamentería, A., Larraceleta, A., Eds.; Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario: Asturias, Spain, 2005; Volume 1, pp. 337–343. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Aerial view of the experimental area and the Romeu site position in Portugal’s Natura 2000 network (Sources: European Environment Agency and Direção Geral do Território).
Figure 1. Aerial view of the experimental area and the Romeu site position in Portugal’s Natura 2000 network (Sources: European Environment Agency and Direção Geral do Território).
Sustainability 14 10979 g001
Figure 2. Species richness (left) and diversity (right) before clearing (May 2019) and after clearing (May 2021).
Figure 2. Species richness (left) and diversity (right) before clearing (May 2019) and after clearing (May 2021).
Sustainability 14 10979 g002
Figure 3. Development of herbaceous (above) and shrub (below) cover since the clearing in May 2019.
Figure 3. Development of herbaceous (above) and shrub (below) cover since the clearing in May 2019.
Sustainability 14 10979 g003
Figure 4. Development of the phytovolume since clearing in May 2019.
Figure 4. Development of the phytovolume since clearing in May 2019.
Sustainability 14 10979 g004
Figure 5. Evolution of herbaceous biomass over time in different treatments.
Figure 5. Evolution of herbaceous biomass over time in different treatments.
Sustainability 14 10979 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Castro, M.; Castro, J.P.; Castro, J. Understory Clearing in Open Grazed Mediterranean Oak Forests: Assessing the Impact on Vegetation. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10979. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710979

AMA Style

Castro M, Castro JP, Castro J. Understory Clearing in Open Grazed Mediterranean Oak Forests: Assessing the Impact on Vegetation. Sustainability. 2022; 14(17):10979. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710979

Chicago/Turabian Style

Castro, Marina, João Paulo Castro, and José Castro. 2022. "Understory Clearing in Open Grazed Mediterranean Oak Forests: Assessing the Impact on Vegetation" Sustainability 14, no. 17: 10979. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710979

APA Style

Castro, M., Castro, J. P., & Castro, J. (2022). Understory Clearing in Open Grazed Mediterranean Oak Forests: Assessing the Impact on Vegetation. Sustainability, 14(17), 10979. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710979

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop