Design and Experiment of Substrate Grass Seed Blanket Extrusion Device
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Structure Design of Extrusion Device for Grass Seed Blanket
2.1. Overall Structure
2.2. Working Principle and Analysis of Extrusion Process
- (1)
- Compaction and filling stage: the substrate and grass seeds are sent to the screw conveyor from the feeding port. The materials naturally fall and accumulate, and the gap between the materials is significant. Due to the continuous falling of the materials and the role of the screw thrust, the positions of the particles are constantly changing and rearranged, in which the water is continuously discharged, and the gap between the materials is reduced and gradually compacted.
- (2)
- Surface deformation and compaction stage: as the extrusion force of the screw on the material slowly increases, the friction gradually increases, the contact between the particles is compact, and the gap is slowly filled. When the material density reaches a certain level, the surface of the larger substrate particles is deformed and broken. At the same time, the intestinal secretions, intestinal mucosal exfoliations, and fiber structures in the material cow dung have good adhesion and entanglement, making the formation between the materials denser.
- (3)
- Plastic deformation stage: with the increasing extrusion force of the spiral on the material, the contact area between the particles is significantly increased. When the extrusion force is gradually increased, the particles undergo plastic deformation, and the particles are reordered. The particles are intertwined, staggered, and embedded, making the mutual combination more firm.
- (4)
- Molding stage: after the molded grass seed blanket is extruded from the discharge port, it will lose the outer shell limit, and some elastic deformation will be restored. At the same time, stress relaxation will occur. The final molded block will achieve permanent deformation and maintain the final density.
3. Stress Analysis and Parameter Design of Screw Conveying Extrusion Device
3.1. Stress Analysis
3.2. Design of Spiral Blade Dimension Parameters
- Y is an axial spiral process, mm;
- X is the turning length of the spiral shaft, mm;
- S0 is the final pitch, mm;
- N is several turns with variable pitch.
3.3. Working Parameter Design of the Helical Blade
4. EDEM Simulation Test Analysis
4.1. Purpose and Method of Simulation Test
4.2. Spiral Feed Extrusion Device and Simulation Model Construction of Substrate Particle Model
4.3. EDEM Simulation Test
4.3.1. Test Plan
4.3.2. Test Index
4.3.3. Results and Analysis
4.3.4. Interaction Analysis of Test Factors
4.3.5. Parameter Optimization
5. Verification Test
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions
- (1)
- According to the technical parameters of grass seed blanket, combined with mechanical analysis, the extrusion molding device of grass seed blanket is designed, which can realize the extrusion molding after mixing the substrate and grass seeds. The molding thickness is about 12 mm, which is convenient to transport and easy to cut. Grass seeds are evenly mixed in the substrate, and the germination effect is good.
- (2)
- Through theoretical analysis and design of the size and working parameters of the screw in the screw conveying and extruding device, it is determined that the main factors affecting the quality of the extruded substrate and the uniformity of grass seed mixing are screw pitch, screw length, screw diameter, and screw speed. The simulation model of extrusion molding device of substrate grass seed blanket was established in EDEM software. Taking the quality of extruded particles and grass seed mixing uniformity as test indexes and the screw pitch, screw length, screw diameter, and screw speed as test factors, the four-element quadratic orthogonal rotation combination simulation experiment was carried out. The optimal parameter combination was obtained: variable pitch screw with a screw pitch of 120~80 mm, screw length of 400 mm, screw diameter of 240 mm, and screw speed of 250 r·min−1. Under the optimal parameters, the extrusion time was 30 s, the mass of extruded pellets was obtained as 2620 g, and the grass seed mixing uniformity was 92.35%.
- (3)
- To ensure the accuracy of the simulation test results, the actual verification test was carried out. The errors between the measured values of extruded substrate quality and grass seed mixing uniformity and the simulation test results of 3.4% and 2.5% met the grass seed blanket extrusion molding requirements.
8. Patents
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Yang, F.; Ignatieva, M.; Larsson, A.; Xiu, N.; Zhang, S. Historical Development and Practices of Lawns in China. Environ. Hist. 2019, 25, 23–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, L.; Fellowes, M. The grass-free lawn: Management and species choice for optimum ground cover and plant diversity. Urban For. Urban Green. 2014, 13, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerin, V.; Lemaire, F.; Marfa, O.; Caceres, R.; Giuffrida, F. Growth of Vibumum tinus in peat-based media and peat-substitute growing media. Sci.-Hortic. 2001, 89, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bignami, C.; Melegari, F.; Zaccardelli, M.; Pane, C.; Ronga, D. Composted Solid Digestate and Vineyard Winter Prunings Partially Replace Peat in Growing Substrates for Micropropagated Highbush Blueberry in the Nursery. Agronomy 2022, 12, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, S.Q.; Zhou, J.B.; Chen, R.X.; Lin, B.; Wang, D.Y. Effects of sludge compost used as lawn medium on lawn growth and soil and water environment. Environ. Sci. 2013, 34, 3969–3974. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J. Effect of different solid medium on blueberry soilless culture. In Proceedings of the 2017 3rd International Forum on Energy, Environment Science and Materials (IFEESM 2017), Shenzhen, China, 25–26 November 2017; pp. 2014–2017. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, C.; Li, J.; Yuan, Q.; Liu, N.; Zhang, X.; Wang, P.; Gao, Y. Effects of different fermentation assisted enzyme treatments on the composition, microstructure and physicochemical properties of wheat straw used as a substitute for peat in nursery substrates. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 341, 125815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nafiye, A.; Mustafa, P. The effects of seedling types and growing media on some physical features in strawberry cultivation with soilless culture. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Derg. 2011, 17, 269–278. [Google Scholar]
- Martnezgutirrez, G.; Morales, I.; Aquinobolaos, T. Substrate volume and nursery times for earliness and yield of greenhouse tomato. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2016, 28, 897–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, D.; Wu, L.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, K.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, A.; Gong, Y.; Bai, X. A Straw Greening Brick and Its Preparation Method. Chinese Patent CN110192476A, 6 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.; Su, M.; Ye, J.; Yang, Z.; Cai, Z.; Yan, H.; Hong, J. All-straw-fiber composites: Benzylated straw as matrix and additional straw fiber reinforced composites. Polym. Compos. 2013, 35, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Teng, H.; Wang, X.; Xu, J.; Sheng, L. Physicochemical modification of corn straw biochar to improve performance and its application of constructed wetland substrate to treat city tail water. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 310, 114758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, P.; You, D. Turf Height Optimization of Artificial Turf Machine. Mech. Des. Manuf. 2014, 5, 18–21. [Google Scholar]
- A sharp weapon for ecological restoration and desertification control—KLD environmental protection grass blanket. Green. Living 2012, 53–56. Available online: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-LHYS201211024.htm (accessed on 12 July 2022).
- Nona, K.D.; Lenaerts, B.; Kayacan, E. Bulk compression characteristics of straw and hay. Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 118, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beaudry, K.; Macdougall, C. Structural performance of non-plastered modular straw bale wall panels under transverse and gravity loads. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 216, 424–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tumuluru, J.S.; Tabil, L.G.; Song, Y.; Iroba, K.L.; Meda, V. Impact of process conditions on the density and durability of wheat, oat, canola, and barley straw briquettes. Bioenergy Res. 2014, 8, 388–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, D.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, K.; Cheng, Q.; Bai, X.; Gong, Y. Experimental study on molding technology for making seedling block based on maize stovers. Trans. CSAE 2020, 36, 241–248. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Q.; Cai, H.; Yang, K.; Yi, W. Effect of biochar on mechanical and flame retardant properties of wood-plastic composites. Results Phys. 2017, 7, 2391–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, B.H.; Liu, L.; Liu, S.Y.; Zheng, K.X.; Hua, L.; Wang, S. Analysis and Research of Force and Motion of Screw-Type Extrusion Molding Biomass. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 614–615, 452–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moro, M.K.; Teixeira, R.S.S.; da Silva, A.S.; Fujimoto, M.D.; Melo, P.A.; Secchi, A.; Bon, E.P.D.S. Continuous pretreatment of sugarcane biomass using a twin-screw extruder. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 97, 509–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Widerøe, F.; Welo, T. An Investigation of the Material Flow in a Screw Extruder of Aluminium Using Contrast Material. Key Eng. Mater. 2012, 1665, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, D.; Xu, A.H.; Chen, X.; Hu, Y. Hydrostatic analysis and numerical simulation of biomass screw conveying process. Mech. Des. 2015, 32, 81–86. [Google Scholar]
- Jia, C.; Cheng, H. Research on Parametric Study Method of Screw Conveyor. Mach. Des. Manuf. 2015, 4, 206–208. [Google Scholar]
- Tu, D.Y.; Xu, A.H.; Wang, X.; Chen, X. Mechanical Model of Variable Diameter and Screw Pitch for Biomass Screw Feeder. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 614–615, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, X.; Zou, L.L.; Lu, B.; Zhang, S.L.; Su, X.R.; Xu, H. Research on the Connection Performance of Variable Pitch of Screw Threaded Casing Based on 3D Finite Element Simulation Model. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2012, 2023, 1105–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.; Ma, T.; Li, B. Design and test of 1JHL-2 type straw deep burying and returning machine. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2017, 33, 32–40. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Z.F.; Jiang, L.Q. Design of Combined Helical Blade Manufacturing Device. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 2526, 753–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mei, L.; Hu, J.Q.; Li, Y.Z.; Yang, G.B. Modeling and Simulation of Horizontal Single Head Screw Conveyor with Different Fill Levels and Rotational Speed Based on EDEM. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2013, 2746, 423–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, X.; Wei, Y.; Yan, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Cao, D.; Li, K.; He, Z.; Cui, Y. Simulation and Experiment of the Spiral Digging End-Effector for Hole Digging in Plug Tray Seedling Substrate. Agronomy 2022, 12, 779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.; Zhang, X.; Zeng, Q.; Gao, K.; Jiang, K.; Zhou, J. Application of a screw conveyor with axial tilt blades on a shearer drum and investigation of conveying performance based on DEM. Particuology 2022, 61, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, S.; Yang, Q.; Niu, K.; Zhao, B.; Zhou, L.; Yuan, Y. Discrete Element-based Optimization Parameters of an Experimental Corn Silage Crushing and Throwing Device. Trans. Asabe 2021, 64, 1019–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, D.; Liu, Y.; Wang, B.; Liu, Y. Design and Test of Corn Stalk Nutritional Lump Molding Machine. J. Shenyang Agric. Univ. 2018, 49, 348–354. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, H. Virtual Design of Rapid Sample Preparation Equipment for Textiles Based on SOLIDWORKS. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2013, 2555, 365–366. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, X.K.; An, S.; Wang, C.S.; Bian, H.G. Research on Optimization of the Process Parameters of Bio-Packaging Materials by Response Surface Method. Key Eng. Mater. 2012, 1622, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, C.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Xue, K.; Zhang, S.; Liao, J.; Tai, Q.; Zhu, D. Design and optimization and experimental verification of a segmented double-helix blade roller for straw returning cultivators. J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 2021, 44, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, Y.; Yu, W.; Hou, Y. Investigating the Functions of Particles in Packed Aggregate Blend using a Discrete Element Method. Substrates 2019, 12, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hemavathi, M.; Shekhar, S.; Varghese, E.; Jaggi, S.; Sinha, B.; Mandal, N.K. Theoretical developments in response surface designs: An informative review and further thoughts. Commun. Stat.-Theory Methods 2022, 51, 2009–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.L.; Duy, L.T. Using the Box–Behnken Response Surface Method to Study Parametric Influence to Improve the Efficiency of Helical Gears. Machines 2021, 9, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, G.; Sharma, S.; Singh, B. Response Surface Analysis for Preparation of Modified Flours using Twin Screw Extrusion Cooking. Int. J. Food Eng. 2014, 10, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wulantuya; Wang, C.; Zhao, F.; Wang, X. Experimental and optimization of screw conveyor parameters for rubbing and beraking corn straw. J. China Agric. Univ. 2019, 24, 115–122. [Google Scholar]
- He, X.; Lv, Y.; Qu, Z.; Wang, W.; Zhou, Z.; He, H. Parameters Optimization and Test of Caterpillar Self-Propelled Tiger Nut Harvester Hoisting Device. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Substrate Characteristic Analysis | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Index | Total porosity/% | Aeration porosity/% | Water-holding porosity/% | Bulk density/ g cm−3 | Electrical conductivity/µs·cm−1 | pH value |
Parameters | 65.73 | 20.21 | 58.32 | 0.43 | 820~1300 | 5.8 |
The Lumpiness of the Material | The Abrasive Cut of Material | Application | K Value |
---|---|---|---|
The powdery | There was no grinding cut Half a mill cut | Flour, Graphite Lime, Soda ash | 0.0415 |
The powdery | Grinding cut sex | Dry furnace powder, Cement, Gypsum powder | 0.0565 |
Granular | There was no grinding cut Half a mill cut | Grain, Sawdust, Coal slime, Granular salt | 0.0439 |
Granular, Small block < 60 mm | Grinding cut sex There was no grinding cut | Molding soil, Molding sand, Coal, Limestone | 0.0600 0.0537 |
Parameter | Numerical Value |
---|---|
Substrate particle—Substrate particle to particle recovery coefficient, e | 0.30 |
Substrate particles—Static friction coefficient between substrate particles, μs | 0.65 |
Substrate particle—Dynamic friction coefficient between substrate particles, μr | 0.43 |
Substrate particles—Intergranular recovery coefficient of grass seeds, e | 0.20 |
Substrate particles—Static friction coefficient between grass seeds, μs | 0.52 |
Substrate particles—Dynamic friction coefficient between grass seeds, μr | 0.05 |
Grass seed granule—Intergranular recovery coefficient of grass seeds, e | 0.25 |
Grass seed granule—Static friction coefficient between grass seeds, μs | 0.30 |
Grass seed granule—Dynamic friction coefficient between grass seeds, μr | 0.01 |
Substrate particles—Recovery coefficient between steels, e | 0.28 |
Substrate particles—Static friction coefficient of steel, μs | 0.30 |
Substrate particles—Dynamic friction coefficient of steel, μr | 0.20 |
Factor Levels | Factors | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Spiral Speed X1/r·min−1 | Spiral Pitch X2/mm | Spiral Diameter X3/mm | Spiral Length X4/mm | |
+2 | 100 | 70~130 mm Variable pitch screw | 180 | 300 |
1 | 150 | 80~120 mm Variable pitch screw | 210 | 350 |
0 | 200 | 120~80 mm Variable pitch screw | 240 | 400 |
−1 | 250 | 130~70 mm Variable pitch screw | 270 | 450 |
−2 | 300 | 140~60 mm Variable pitch screw | 300 | 500 |
Number | Spiral Speed X1 | Spiral Pitch X2 | Spiral Diameter X3 | Spiral Length X4 | Extruded Particle Mass Y1/g | Uniformity of Grass Seed Mixing Y2/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 2520 | 86.21 |
2 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 2548 | 94.96 |
3 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 2590 | 86.14 |
4 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 2645 | 91.05 |
5 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 2418 | 82.52 |
6 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 2709 | 84.28 |
7 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 2456 | 83.25 |
8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 2585 | 87.64 |
9 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 2326 | 83.11 |
10 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 2598 | 83.67 |
11 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 2442 | 81.21 |
12 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 2657 | 82.68 |
13 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 2312 | 83.86 |
14 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 2549 | 82.01 |
15 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2351 | 82.31 |
16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2578 | 85.63 |
17 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2289 | 81.02 |
18 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2751 | 85.81 |
19 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 2425 | 84.58 |
20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2435 | 85.55 |
21 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 2679 | 94.22 |
22 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2532 | 88.95 |
23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 2623 | 89.01 |
24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2414 | 82.65 |
25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2674 | 93.97 |
26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2685 | 93.22 |
27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2669 | 92.91 |
28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2690 | 92.86 |
29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2689 | 92.84 |
30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2629 | 90.45 |
Parameters | Extruded Particle Mass | Uniformity of Grass Seed Mixing | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
F Value | p-Value | F Value | p-Value | |
Model | 21.90 | <0.0001 | 28.27 | <0.0001 |
X1 | 149.19 | <0.0001 | 74.52 | <0.0001 |
X3 | 11.56 | 0.0040 | 55.42 | <0.0001 |
X4 | 30.55 | <0.0001 | 53.00 | <0.0001 |
X1 × 4 | 7.94 | <0.0001 | 7.25 | 0.0167 |
X2 × 3 | 5.13 | 0.0388 | 9.61 | 0.0073 |
X3 × 4 | - | - | 8.77 | 0.0013 |
X12 | 25.47 | <0.0001 | 80.75 | <0.0001 |
X22 | 64.18 | <0.0001 | 84.54 | <0.0001 |
X32 | 4.79 | 0.0415 | 14.71 | 0.0917 |
X42 | 25.97 | <0.0001 | 66.35 | <0.0001 |
Fitting | 3.98 | 0.702 | 2.65 | 0.1558 |
Parameters | Spiral Speed X1/r·min−1 | Spiral Pitch X2/mm | Spiral Diameter X3/mm | Spiral Length X4/mm | Extruded Particle Mass Y1/g | Uniformity of Grass Seed Mixing Y2/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Test value | 250 | 120~80 mm | 240 | 400 | 2620 | 92.35 |
Predicted value | 233 | 120~80 mm | 232 | 371 | 2721 | 94.96 |
Error | 0.0371 | 0.0274 |
Parameters | Test Serial Number | Average | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
Extrusion substrate mass/g | 2570 | 2550 | 2580 | 2520 | 2575 | 2559 |
Uniformity of grass seed mixing/% | 90.8 | 89.2 | 91.4 | 90.3 | 89.7 | 90.28 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, T.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Sun, J.; Liu, D. Design and Experiment of Substrate Grass Seed Blanket Extrusion Device. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11046. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711046
Liu T, Wang J, Li Y, Liu Z, Sun J, Liu D. Design and Experiment of Substrate Grass Seed Blanket Extrusion Device. Sustainability. 2022; 14(17):11046. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711046
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Tianqi, Jiaxin Wang, Yuge Li, Zihui Liu, Jiayi Sun, and Dejun Liu. 2022. "Design and Experiment of Substrate Grass Seed Blanket Extrusion Device" Sustainability 14, no. 17: 11046. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711046
APA StyleLiu, T., Wang, J., Li, Y., Liu, Z., Sun, J., & Liu, D. (2022). Design and Experiment of Substrate Grass Seed Blanket Extrusion Device. Sustainability, 14(17), 11046. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711046