Carbon Stock Estimation of Selected Subtropical Broad-Leaved Evergreen Scrub Forest
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Sample Plots and Sampling Intensity
2.3. Size and Shape of Sample Plots
2.4. Trees Identification
2.5. Basic Wood Density (BWD)
2.6. Measurements in the Sample Plot
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Stem Density and Abundance of Trees
3.2. Mean Height and Mean Diameter at Breast Height (DBH)
3.3. Biomass and Carbon Stocks
3.4. Pool-Wise Carbon Stock
3.5. Statistical Analysis
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Spangler, L.; Vierling, L.A. Quantifying Forest Aboveground Carbon Pools And Fluxes Using Multi-Temporal Lidar. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), 2011. Available online: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdoepub/355/ (accessed on 14 June 2020).
- Sahle, M. Estimating and Mapping of Carbon Stocks Based on Remote Sensing, GIS and Ground Survey in the MenageshaSuba State Forest, Ethiopia. Ph.D. Thesis, School of Graduate Studies of Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. Global Forest Resource Assessment 2015, How are the World’s Forests Changing, 2nd ed.; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. The State of the World’s Forests. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. 2020. Available online: https://www.fao.org/state-of-forests/en/ (accessed on 12 April 2022).
- Feng, Y. Forest carbon sequestration models under specific forest management strategies. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Green Environmental Materials and Food Engineering (GEMFE 2022), Changsha, China, 16–17 January 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, S.; Khan, S.M.; Siddiq, Z.; Ahmad, Z.; Ahmad, K.S.; Abdullah, A.; Hashem, A.; AI-Arjani, A.B.; Abd Allah, E.F. Carbon sequestration potential of reserve forests present in the protected Margalla Hills National Park. J. King Saud. Univ. Sci. 2022, 34, 101978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jha, S. State of the World’s Forests 2022: 10% of Total Forest Area on Earth Lost in 30 Years. 2022. Available online: https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/forests/state-of-the-world-s-forests-2022-10-of-total-forest-area-on-earth-lost-in-30-years-82658 (accessed on 12 April 2022).
- Kauffman, J.B.; Heider, C.; Norfolk, J.; Payton, F. Carbon stocks of intact mangroves and carbon emissions arising from their conversion in the Dominican Republic. Ecol. Appl. 2014, 24, 518–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Köhl, M.; Baldauf, T.; Plugge, D.; Krug, J. Reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD): A climate change mitigation strategy on a critical track. Carbon Balance Manag. 2009, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Assefa, G.; Mengistu, T.; Getu, Z.; Zewdie, S. Training Manual On: Forest Carbon Pools and Carbon Stock Assessment in the Context of SFM and REDD+; Hawassa University, Wondo Genet College of Forestry and Natural Resources: Hawassa, Ethiopia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Hassan, M.; Hussain, M.; Ali, A.; Rehman, F.; Tabassum, A.; Amin, M.; Usman, N.; Bashir, S.; Raza, G.; Yousaf, A.; et al. Economic valuation of selected ecosystem services in Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT), Pakistan. Braz. J. Biol. 2022, 84, e260614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Feng, L.; Li, F.; Yu, L. Characteristics and Drivers of Soil Organic Carbon Saturation Deficit in Karst Forests of China. Diversity 2022, 14, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pakistan’s Readiness Preparation Proposal. In Proceedings of the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) Sixteenth Participants Committee Meeting, Geneva, Switzerland, 12–15 December 2014; pp. 1–3.
- Minstry of Climate Change. Pakistan’s First Biennial Update Report (BUR-1) to The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2022. Available online: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Pakistan%E2%80%99s%20First%20Biennial%20Update%20Report%20%28BUR-1%29%20-%202022.pdf (accessed on 12 April 2022).
- Pothong, T.; Elliott, S.; Chairuangsri, S.; Chanthorn, W.; Shannon, D.P.; Wangpakapattanawong, P. New allometric equations for quantifying tree biomass and carbon sequestration in seasonally dry secondary forest in northern Thailand. New For. 2022, 53, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diao, J.; Liu, J.; Zhu, Z.; Wei, X.; Li, M. Active forest management accelerates carbon storage in plantation forests in Lishui, southern China. For. Ecosyst. 2022, 9, 100004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandbrook, C.; Nelson, F.; Adams, W.M.; Agrawal, A. Carbon, forests and the REDD paradox. Oryx 2010, 44, 330–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Su, J.; Liu, W.; Lang, X.; Huang, X.; Jia, C.; Zhang, Z.; Tong, Q. Changes in Biomass Carbon Stocks following the conversion from a Secondary Coniferous Forest to a Pine Plantation. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zomer, R.J.; Trabucco, A.; Bossio, D.A.; Verchot, L.V. Climate change mitigation: A spatial analysis of global land suitability for clean development mechanism afforestation and reforestation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 126, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- REDD+ Readiness (R-Package) PAKISTAN. Ministry of Climate Change and REDD+ Pakistan. 2020. Available online: https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/system/files/documents/pc30_2b._pakistan-r-package_0.pdf (accessed on 14 April 2022).
- Bhatti, S.I. An Over View of Forests in Pakistan. World Environmental Day 16 June 2011. Available online: https://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiqlpua6f_5AhXzt1YBHVM0AZgQFnoECA4QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fpecongress.org.pk%2Fimages%2Fupload%2Fbooks%2F(9)%2520An%2520Overview%2520of%2520Forests%2520in%2520Pakistan%2520By%2520Engr.%2520Saeed%2520Iqbal%2520.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2bRtKL2nh6IeW8R_id0phY (accessed on 14 June 2021).
- Satti, S. A Hand Book of Kotli Sattian; Nanopathy: Bankura, West Bengal, India, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Chisholm, D.; James, S.; Sekar, K.; Kumar, K.K.; Murthy, R.S.; Saeed, K.; Mubbashar, M. Integration of mental health care into primary care. Br. J. Psychiatry 2000, 176, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Available online: https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/system/files/documents/Pakistan%27s%20Revised%20R-PP%20-%20September%2010%202014.pdf (accessed on 29 January 2021).
- Pakistan Page-Lehtrar Bala. 2017. Available online: http://www.fallingrain.com/world/PK/04/Lehtrar_Bala.html (accessed on 14 June 2021).
- Available online: http://www.tageo.com/index-e-pk-v-04-d-m3841856.htm (accessed on 14 June 2020).
- Maplandia-LehtrarBala. 2017. Available online: http://www.maplandia.com/pakistan/f-c-t/islamabad/lehtrar-bala/ (accessed on 14 June 2021).
- Sheikh, M.A.; Kumar, M.; Bussmann, R.W. Altitudinal variation in soil organic carbon stock in Coniferous Subtropical and Broadleaf Temperate Forests in Garhwal Himalaya. Carbon Balance Manag. 2009, 4, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- WorldWide Index-Lehtrar Bala. 2017. Available online: https://www.worldweatheronline.com/lehtrar-bala-weather/punjab/pk.aspx (accessed on 14 May 2018).
- Lackmann, S. Good Practice in designing a forest inventory. In Regional Workshop: Capacity Development for Sustainable National Greenhouse Gas Inventories–AFOLU Sector (CD-REDD II) Programme. 2011. Available online: http://www.rainforestcoalition.org/TinyMceFiles/CD (accessed on 14 June 2021).
- Philip, M.S. Measuring Tree and Forests, 2nd ed.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Haripriya, G.S. Estimates of biomass in Indian forests. Biomass Bioenergy 2000, 19, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, G.R.; Pearce, S.H.; Graham, J.D.; Beets, P. Carbon in Plantation Understorey Shrubs; Scion Contract Report 43877; Ministry for the Environment: Wellington, New Zealand, 2009.
- Thenkabail, P.S.; Stucky, N.; Griscom, B.W.; Ashton, M.S.; Diels, J.; Van Der Meer, B.; Enclona, E. Biomass estimations and carbon stock calculations in the oil palm plantations of African derived savannas using IKONOS data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2004, 25, 5447–5472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IPCC. Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Rajput, B.S.; Bhardwaj, D.R.; Pala, N.A. Carbon dioxide mitigation potential and carbon density of different land use systems along an altitudinal gradient in north-western Himalayas. Agrofor. Syst. 2015, 89, 525–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sims, Z.R.; Nielsen, G.A. Organic carbon in Montana soils as related to clay content and climate. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1986, 50, 1269–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tate, K.R. Assessment, based on a climosequence of soils in tussock grasslands, of soil carbon storage and release in response to global warming. J. Soil Sci. 1992, 43, 697–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, C.M.; Gairola, S.; Baduni, N.P.; Ghildiyal, S.K.; Suyal, S. Variation in carbon stocks on different slope aspects in seven major forest types of temperate region of Garhwal Himalaya, India. J. Biosci. 2011, 36, 701–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nizami, S.M. The inventory of the carbon stocks in subtropical forests of Pakistan for reporting under Kyoto Protocol. J. For. Res. 2012, 23, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plot Nos. | Latitude (X) | Longitude (Y) | Aspect (Degrees) | Slope (Degrees) | Elevation (Meters above Sea Level) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 33°40′00″ | 73°21′00″ | NW/312.28 | 1.7 | 687 |
2 | 33°43′52″ | 73°24′00″ | NW/309.36 | 1.9 | 690 |
3 | 33°56′59.87″ | 73°36′00″ | NE/47.28 | 2.6 | 691.76 |
4 | 33°59′00″ | 73°43′00″ | NE/46.32 | 0.97 | 695 |
5 | 33°41′55.8″ | 73°22.8′00″ | N/1.28 | 2.36 | 695.8 |
6 | 33°54′00″ | 73°35.8′00″ | NW/326.25 | 3.45 | 697 |
S.No | Name of Species | BWD (kg/m3) |
---|---|---|
01 | Acacia modesta (phulai) | 0.96 |
02 | Olea ferruginaea/Olea Cuspidata (kahu) | 1.125 |
03 | Dalbergia sissoo (sheesham) | 0.93 |
04 | Prinsepia utilis (bekhal) | 0.40 |
Methods and Calculations for Measuring the AGB as Well as Average Carbon Stock | ||
---|---|---|
AGB—Trees Biomass calculation of trees involved the measurement of tree height, diameter at breast height (DBH) and tree volume (V). | Height: | In order to reach the height measurements of the trees present in each plot the instrument called Abney’s level was used. |
DBH: | In order to carry out the carbon stock measurements of the trees, the diameter at breast height (DBH) was measured using a diameter tape. | |
Volume: | The volume of trees was measured using the following formula: V(m3) = (∏/4 × d2) × h × f Here: h = height of tree, d2 = square of the DBH, and f = form factor (Phillips, 1994) [31]. | |
Shrubs | The biomass and carbon stock estimates of the shrubs were carried out by undergoing destructive sampling, i.e., all the shrubs present in the plot of 5.64 m were cut. These shrubs were sent to the laboratory for dry weight measurements after passing them through oven-drying. The dry weight was considered as the biomass of these shrubs in grams (g) (Oliver et al., 2009) [33]. | |
Litter | This was done by collecting all the twigs, fallen leaves, etc., found in the smaller plot of 1 m2. These collected samples were put in bags and sent for dry weight measurements. | |
Total AGB/ total tree biomass: | The stem biomass was obtained after multiplying the stem volume with specific wood density of particular tree species: Stem biomass = SV × WD While the total crown biomass or total tree biomass was obtained by multiplying the resultant estimate with BEF. The following formula was used: Total tree biomass = SV × WD × BEF where SV= stem volume (m3) and WD= basic wood density (kg/m3). WD values were taken from the available literature (Haripriya, 2000 [32]). | |
Total Carbon Stock | It is generally considered that about half of the dry biomass consists of carbon. As per the Kyoto Protocol of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, it is important to take into account the biomass sinks (Thenkabail et al., 2004 [34]). These sinks determine the hotspots for carbon dioxide storage which can help in conducting CO2 emissions from forests inventory. Moreover, the threat of forest fires can also be monitored. Thus, the dry biomass can be converted to carbon stock by multiplying it with the carbon content conversion factor having a default value of 0.47. In the current study, the carbon stock was calculated by assuming that the carbon content is 47 % of total biomass, as described by IPCC (IPCC, 2003 [35]). Total carbon stocks (tons/ha) = biomass (tons/ha) × 0.47 Belowground biomass was estimated by multiplying the aboveground biomass with the carbon content conversion factor having a default value of 0.26. Thus, it supports the study of Thenkabail et al., 2004 [34] and Aseefa et al., 2013 [9]. |
Plot Number | Number of Trees |
---|---|
1 | 54 |
2 | 49 |
3 | 57 |
4 | 48 |
5 | 51 |
6 | 53 |
Plot Nos. | Mean Heights (m) | Mean DBHs (cm) |
---|---|---|
1 | 21.7 | 25.4 |
2 | 18.7 | 26.3 |
3 | 18.315 | 10.0 |
4 | 16.3 | 12.3 |
5 | 15.8 | 13.1 |
6 | 9.93588 | 15.1 |
Mean | 16.79 | 17.03 |
Slope | Elevation | AGB | Litter | Shrubs | Total AGB | Total BGB | Total Biomass | Total AGC | Total BGC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Elevation | 0.39 | |||||||||
AGB | 0.16 | 0.24 | ||||||||
Litter | 0.44 | 0.41 | −0.40 | |||||||
Shrubs | −0.15 | −0.71 | −0.34 | −0.55 | ||||||
Total AGB | 0.05 | −0.72 | 0.27 | −0.52 | 0.68 | |||||
Total BGB | −0.28 | 0.25 | −0.43 | 0.51 | −0.21 | −0.36 | ||||
Total biomass | 0.78 | 0.61 | 0.38 | 0.00 | −0.07 | −0.04 | −0.33 | |||
Total AGC | 0.67 | 0.56 | 0.44 | −0.18 | −0.01 | −0.01 | −0.42 | 0.98 | ||
Total BGC | 0.39 | −0.08 | −0.33 | 0.78 | −0.13 | 0.11 | 0.49 | −0.17 | −0.34 | |
Total MCS | −0.03 | −0.79 | −0.08 | −0.62 | 0.86 | 0.74 | −0.64 | −0.05 | 0.04 | −0.24 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sajjad, A.; Begum, S.; Adnan, M.; Chaudhry, G.-e.-S.; Ibrahim, M.; Jamil Noor, M.; Jabeen, A.; Khalid, S.; Iram, S.; Yik Sung, Y.; et al. Carbon Stock Estimation of Selected Subtropical Broad-Leaved Evergreen Scrub Forest. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11219. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811219
Sajjad A, Begum S, Adnan M, Chaudhry G-e-S, Ibrahim M, Jamil Noor M, Jabeen A, Khalid S, Iram S, Yik Sung Y, et al. Carbon Stock Estimation of Selected Subtropical Broad-Leaved Evergreen Scrub Forest. Sustainability. 2022; 14(18):11219. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811219
Chicago/Turabian StyleSajjad, Aisha, Shaheen Begum, Muhammad Adnan, Gul-e-Saba Chaudhry, Muhammad Ibrahim, Mehwish Jamil Noor, Asma Jabeen, Sofia Khalid, Shazia Iram, Yeong Yik Sung, and et al. 2022. "Carbon Stock Estimation of Selected Subtropical Broad-Leaved Evergreen Scrub Forest" Sustainability 14, no. 18: 11219. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811219
APA StyleSajjad, A., Begum, S., Adnan, M., Chaudhry, G. -e. -S., Ibrahim, M., Jamil Noor, M., Jabeen, A., Khalid, S., Iram, S., Yik Sung, Y., & Muhammad, T. S. T. (2022). Carbon Stock Estimation of Selected Subtropical Broad-Leaved Evergreen Scrub Forest. Sustainability, 14(18), 11219. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811219