1. Introduction
Sustainable development is a goal that is general and attractive to everyone. Different actors have the opportunity to respond to the requirements of sustainability in their own way. It is important to involve as many of them as possible. Certain measures and participants of these activities are more specifically described in the literature and have been conducting their activities for years, e.g., in the business sector. However, the methods and activities of individual and group members of the community appear to be less developed.
A society, at all levels of its organization, i.e., families, local communities, organizations, municipalities, regions, countries, or continents, must be socially responsible. Skillful management, considered as a science and art, is the basic condition for the survival of a civilization [
1].
Activities that are to serve such ambitious goals as sustainable development or social inclusion, etc., require the participation and cooperation of broadly understood social entities, i.e., scientists, citizens, and third-sector organizations. Thanks to this cooperation, it is possible to achieve a high degree of innovation which conditions the adaptation of developed solutions to the needs of the society. Additionally, development processes also gain greater favor from the social groups if they are designed with their acceptance and commitment [
2]. It is necessary to involve the society in the design and decision-making processes in order to obtain longstanding effects of such development.
The concept of civil society organizations is not unambiguous, and there are many definitions of this phenomenon: e.g., “volunteering”, “charities”, “third sector”, “self-help and consumer groups”, etc. According to Hutter and O’Mahony [
3] there are two features that define civil society organizations. Fundamentally, they are independent of the state and are determined to make a financial profit. Civil society is definitely a sphere of influence beyond the state and business and represents groups deprived of their rights or with difficult access to those.
Social responsibility is based on the ability to consciously and voluntarily decide about one’s own actions in relation to others. Each generation must take responsibility for its actions and their impact on sustainable development. The analysis and presentation of good practices of this aspect is essential for sustainable development, for example, in the field of the institutional policy of universities [
4].
Many literature items indicate that pro-social behavior is influenced by a number of factors, such as social norms or economic conditions. Pro-social organizations are the basis of economic order. They shape the behavior of key economic entities: private persons, enterprises, and government organizations. Organizations operating in the field of the social economy ensure the coordination of economic activity of agents and harmonization of their interests, contribute to social development and economic efficiency, and ensure the well-being of people and society [
5].
Two polar opposites can be distinguished among social-economy entities. The first concerns organizations that promote civic engagement and defend their rights, and they can be called the ‘advocacy’ organizations. They are political in nature; they mobilize the society and carry out lobbying activities. On the other extreme, there are social organizations that are oriented to reducing poverty, protecting the environment, and helping the excluded. They work on development programs and operate through education, training, material support, and other welfare issues [
6]. Organized socially engaged activities take formalized and informal forms. They can also be considered as the implementation of civil responsibility. Forms of manifesting civil responsibility include the desire to personally participate in social changes for the benefit of one’s nation and local community, emotional empathy for those who need social protection and support, and readiness to assume additional obligations towards society and specific individuals [
7].
Social responsibility (SR) may take less formal forms, as an individual’s willingness to take actions that benefit society. Other authors understand SR [
8] to be a broader responsibility of the individual and a desire to contribute to collective efforts to strengthen the resilience of the community of which they are part [
9]. Navarro (2006) stated that social responsibility must be practiced and defines it as a moral behavior. According to this author, socially responsible behaviors are those behaviors that can occur in different areas that have at their core an intention oriented to the good of all and that are practiced with a certain frequency [
10].
Social participation in sustainable development can take various forms, ranging from individual and spontaneous actions, e.g., vaccination against COVID-19 [
11] to organized, systematic actions, e.g., within formal social organizations. The literature often describes consumer social responsibility in the context of corporate social responsibility [
12]. Both responsibilities are considered interdependent [
10,
13,
14,
15]. Consumer social responsibility is seen as an opportunity to support sustainable development [
10,
13,
14,
16,
17]. Although many items of the literature include research on consumer social responsibility, research is also needed that includes SR multifacetedly, which includes human behavior as a whole, beyond consumption [
18]. Research and social responsibility are indicated in the group of young people entering adult life, because it is they who will directly influence sustainable development in the near future [
19,
20].
Among the factors characterizing socially responsible behavior, there is an individual’s desire to interact with other, like-minded people (neighbors, colleagues, friends, colleagues). The closer relationships are formed with a community, the more important the social norms of that community become and the greater the possible effect-of-social behavior [
21]. Another feature of socially responsible behavior is impersonal social trust. The interaction of business entities should follow universal principles that do not depend on the individual characteristics of the person and participants in the relationship. Impersonal trust widens the boundaries of social networks and contributes to increasing social capital. The relationships that form between strangers are especially important in this context. These are the so-called weak bonds. They become a “bridge” that ensures stable cooperation of various social groups, contributing to the expansion of the sphere of pro-social behavior [
5].
Ramos et al. (2016) indicate several dimensions of social responsibility: social commitment determines personal fulfillment, is based on recognition and respect for the dignity of every person, activates the need to be open to others and focus on the common good, and contributes to sustainable development in the immediate vicinity through the actions taken [
22].
Some authors indicate that social commitment has a multi-stage form and can be developed in the education process by providing information on norms and principles influencing the sharing of new values and increasing civic participation. Another element in shaping social responsibility is experience. In the environment of young people, experiences indicated as forming SR include, e.g., participation in projects for non-governmental organizations, work in the school or student council, one-year volunteer internship in a foreign non-profit organization, etc. [
4,
23,
24,
25,
26].
In this study, we are dealing with a voluntary form of pro-social activity, which is a personal experience that something specific can be done to contribute to the improvement of society. As part of completing the student internship, the group independently identified and undertook to implement the goal of raising awareness in the area of cancer prevention in a peer group. The team has carried out several activities to achieve the goal: research, information quiz, and presentation of the results at an international conference.
The paper presents one of the ways a socially engaged group participates in pro-development management. As part of practical classes at their university, a team of young people (who are also representatives of the target group) carried out a pro-social project. It consisted of several elements and its effects were multifaceted. The scope of the project was limited to the local environment, but it could easily be implemented on a larger, even international, scale. Thanks to the product differentiation, the method based on the diagnosis, and the knowledge of the group of beneficiaries, the applied solution may bring significant social benefits.
The first chapter presents the methodological assumptions of own research conducted by the team as part of the preparation of a socially responsible product. The entire process is staged—from the formation of the team, through the subsequent phases of work, to the results obtained. The next part simultaneously introduces the research problem and the social problem, the solution to which was undertaken by the team in the form of manufactured products. The subsequent part describes the results, starting with the characteristics of the research and the target group. The paper ends with a discussion and summary.
3. Cancer Prevention as a Social Problem
Cancer is the second only to heart disease as the most common cause of death in both men and women in many countries around the world [
36,
37].
Cancer treatment research is a multidisciplinary area of investigation that explores how social factors, funding systems, organizational structures and processes, health technologies, and the behavior of healthcare providers and patients influence access to cancer care, its quality and cost of cancer care, and ultimately, the health and well-being of patients and survivors. It appears that a key challenge for the next decade is to bring together a variety of stakeholders, including patients, healthcare professionals, payers, healthcare organizations, and cancer non-profits, to accelerate behavioral healthcare innovation in cancer care and cancer control [
38].
Cancer prevention, also known as oncological prevention, includes activities undertaken by patients who are potentially at risk, thanks to which it is possible to detect a given cancer disease and related changes and symptoms early. For example, among cancers of the female reproductive system, ovarian cancer became the second most common and is the fifth ranked cause of cancer-related mortalities in women in Europe and the United States [
39]. Although our understanding of ovarian cancer has vastly improved, the etiology of the disease remains unknown. Moreover, even though surgical procedures have made great progress and new protocols of chemotherapy were introduced, the 5-year survival rate does not exceed 45%. The main reason for that is that most women with ovarian cancer present with the late stage of the disease, despite introducing new markers for the detection of ovarian cancer [
40,
41].
The authors of another publication describe prevention as maintaining and strengthening human health and ensuring natural environment systems [
42]. Studies conducted in the USA and Europe indicate that the use of EBP, including broadly understood prevention, in the preventive actions and reduction of cancer risk can potentially lessen the overall cancer burden by 42–60% [
43].
Preventative measures, depending on their nature, can also be divided into the following types:
- -
early prevention;
- -
primary prevention;
- -
indirect prevention;
- -
secondary prevention [
42].
Depending on the specificity, early prevention was mentioned as the first one. It consists in promoting an appropriate lifestyle and encouraging people to reject a lifestyle that may adversely affect their condition.
Primary prevention was mentioned as the second one. In this case, measures are undertaken to reduce cancer mortality. It is then determined which factors affect the emergence of a given disease [
44]. In order for the primary prevention to bring the best results, it is necessary to learn about the risk factors and the carcinogens that occur.
The last of the above is the indirect prevention. This type particularly focuses on the activities undertaken to shorten the duration of the patient’s existing neoplastic disease.
The last of these is the secondary prevention. It is worth paying attention to how the mentioned secondary (early) detection is carried out. These activities include, but are not limited to:
- -
all activities contributing to a pro-health behavior;
- -
routine examinations carried out by specialized doctors [
44].
It should be emphasized that secondary prevention takes place when a given patient has not yet experienced cancer symptoms. This is carried out in order to recognize a possible disease at an early stage, which gives a much better chance of a successful treatment.
Therefore, preventive measures include, inter alia, examinations that may enable the implementation of appropriate treatment in the early stages of cancer development. It should be noted that cancers are genetic diseases. The development of the disease is influenced by the following factors:
The chemical factors include all kinds of compounds, which can be divided into initiating and promoting ones. The physical factors include ionizing radiation, ultraviolet radiation, and radon. The viral agents include human papillomavirus (HPV), Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), and even hepatitis type B and C.
It is worth noting that all kinds of neoplastic diseases, immediately after cardiovascular diseases, contribute to a considerable number of deaths each year [
46]. Moreover, the aforementioned cancer prevention and examinations related to it are appropriate for each type of cancer. Although it may not differ much in each type of cancer, general preventive recommendations have also been developed. An example of such recommendations is the recommendations created by the European Code Against Cancer, presented in
Table 3.
Neoplasms, for which cancer (oncology) prevention is used, can be divided into the following types:
- -
gastrointestinal cancer;
- -
breast cancer;
- -
soft tissue sarcomas;
- -
bone tumors;
- -
skin cancer;
- -
lung cancer;
- -
cancers of the genitourinary system;
- -
cancers of the reproductive organs;
- -
cancer in pregnant women;
- -
tumors of the endocrine glands;
- -
tumor metastases to the bone;
In addition, on the basis of the available literature, the above-mentioned types of cancer are presented with some factors determining why Polish people do not use preventive services [
42]. They have been collected and presented in
Table 4.
In terms of preventing behavior for cancer, it has been made clear that many people do not engage in these risk-reducing behaviors. Factors such as beliefs and limited health awareness and sociodemographic traits can challenge preventive behaviors [
47]. Among the factors influencing the prevention of cancer are, for example, eating habits: eating fruits and vegetables, avoiding red meat; physical activity; smoking; length of exposure to the sun; and sexual activity. The literature indicates that these behaviors are influenced by different conditions during life and that they can be modified [
47,
48].
4. The Approach to Cancer Prevention among Young Poles
4.1. Methodological Assumptions of Data Analysis on Cancer Prevention
The main objective of this part of the empirical research was to find out the level of implementation of preventive examinations and selected conditions influencing this level among young people.
For this purpose, research hypotheses were formulated that the following factors are related to the level of cancer prevention in young people:
HA1, HA2, HA3, HA4, HA5: Demographic Factors (X1–X5).
HB: The level of preventive knowledge (Y1).
HC10, HC11, HC12, HC13 HC16: Pro-health attitude (early prevention) (Y10, Y11, Y12, Y13, Y16).
In the database of the Statistica v. 13 program, dependent (Yn) and independent (Xn) data were collected, which were then subjected to statistical analysis and supplemented with a substantive interpretation (
Table 4).
After the initial substantive division of the variables and establishing their potential diagnostic role for the main objective, research hypotheses were established, and then the significance of the independent variables for the selected dependent variables was tested. Subsequently, the information capacity and the impact on the level of preventive examinations of dependent variables were analyzed, supplementing the profile of conditions for cancer prevention in the research group (
Figure 3).
4.2. Characteristics of the Studied Population
A group of young people up to 30 years of age was the subject of the study. During the analysis, an attempt was made to determine whether young people undergo preventive examinations, why they undergo or forego such procedures, how they take care of their health, and which factors, in their opinion, increase the risk of cancer. An online survey was used to collect the data with the use of a measuring instrument in the form of a questionnaire which consisted of 20 questions subsequently divided into closed questions and a certificate. The study used a non-random sampling of a quota nature. The study was conducted from August 2020 to February 2021. The research group consisted of 326 people and was created as a result of using social networks for sending and sharing messages with a link to the questionnaire.
Individuals under 30 years of age were included in the study. Among them, 247 (75.8%) were people in the 18–24 age group, and the rest of the respondents (79 people) were 25–30 years old (24.2%). Most of the respondents were women—206 people (63.2%), while there were 120 men (36.8%). The respondents also answered the question about their current status, where they could select up to two options. University students constituted the largest group—186 people (57.1%), and there were 70 secondary school students (21.5%). There were 128 working people (39.3%) and solely 5 were unemployed (1.5%). 163 individuals (50%) lived in the city with the population over 50,000. The next group were people living in the countryside—89 (27.3%), the least numerous group constituted those living in a city with a population of up to 50,000—74 (22.7%). In the case of education, the largest number of respondents answered that their education is at the secondary level. This group consisted of 198 people (60.7%). The next group of 66 (20.2%), included the respondents with higher education, and finally, the smallest one included individuals with primary education: 62 respondents (19%).
4.3. Knowledge and Attitude to Cancer Prevention among Young Poles
Young people were asked to indicate whether they undergo preventive examinations. The difference between the groups was not substantial. Most indicated that they undergo such procedures: 194 (59.5%). However, 132 people (40.5%) did not undergo such examinations. The answers were checked with a breakdown into selected demographic characteristics (
Table 5).
As indicated by the chi-square statistic result, women definitely more often undergo preventive examinations than men. The same test confirmed that in the examined group, the remaining demographic variables did not have any impact on the respondents’ inclination to undergo preventive examinations (
Table 5).
The above results provide grounds for the verification of the HA hypothesis: among the examined demographic characteristics, only gender determines the level of anti-cancer prevention in the studied population.
People who answered YES to the previous question were asked to indicate the reasons why they undergo preventive examinations. There was a choice of several themes. The responses are presented in
Table 6.
The most frequently chosen motive was that preventive examinations can prevent disease, indicated by 142 people (44.8%). Among the responses, others also appeared:
- -
I was sick myself;
- -
because I am at risk of developing the disease;
- -
I have a slight hypochondria;
- -
my job requires it.
People who indicated that they did not submit to preventive examinations were asked to indicate the reasons. There was a choice of several reasons. The answers are presented in
Table 7.
The respondents were asked to indicate the meaning of the word ‘prevention’. Only 34 people (10.4%) chose to maintain the correct patterns of a healthy lifestyle. Prevention of the consequences of the disease through its early detection and treatment was selected by 87 people (26.7%). Disease prevention by controlling risk factors was indicated by 53 people (16.3%). Most people believe that all the answers are correct—152 (46.6%). The data are presented in
Scheme 1.
The chi-squared test, performed to establish the relationship between the variables Y1 and Y2, indicated that the differences were insignificant. Therefore, the HB hypothesis was not confirmed, which suggests that the level of knowledge about cancer prevention does not contribute to the increase in cancer prevention activities.
The respondents were to assess their health with the use of the following scale: very good, fairly good, average, rather bad, and very bad. It was also possible to choose the answer: “I have no opinion”. The answers are presented in
Scheme 2.
Young people taking part in the study were asked to indicate which of the given symptoms may be of a neoplastic disease. The respondents most often chose the answers: weight loss—216 people (66.3%); skin lesions—214 people (65.6%); and enlarged, painful lymph nodes—208 people (63.8%). The remaining answers are as follows:
- -
weakness—172 people (52.8%);
- -
headache—171 people (52.5%);
- -
hematuria—161 persons (49.4%);
- -
disorders in urination and stool—160 people (49.1%).
As a result of ordering the dependent variables, four variables (Y1, Y10, Y11, Y12) were selected and their predictive value was assessed in relation to the level of preventive examinations (Y2). This means that they potentially constitute factors that determine undergoing preventive examinations in the study group (
Figure 4).
As a result of ordering by the method of classification trees, variable Y10 turned out to be the diagnostic variable.
After the chi-square test was performed, the negative correlation between smoking and the performance of preventive examinations was confirmed. The HC hypothesis was confirmed (Chi2 (1, N = 346) = 20.1995, p = 0.00001).
In order to multi-dimensionally characterize the significance of factors influencing preventive examinations, the variable analysis was repeated using the classification tree method, including the variable Y10 in the group of independent variables.
The results indicate that young non-smoking women are the group that most frequently undergoes preventive examinations (
Figure 5).
5. Discussion the Results of Research on the Prevention of Cancer Diseases
Despite tremendous advances in medicine over the past few decades and a much better understanding of the symptoms and causes of various cancers, incidence rates continue to rise around the world [
49]. To reduce cancer incidence, it is necessary to focus on promoting prevention strategies through a population-based approach to reducing exposure to modifiable risk factors, in addition to using newer drug interventions (chemoprevention) for prevention in high-risk populations.
The results of the research indicate that among the potentially modifiable prophylactic factors that play a key role in the incidence of numerous neoplastic diseases are, e.g., a healthy diet and increased physical activity, as well as abandoning tobacco smoking or excessive alcohol consumption [
50]. A study by Weitzer et al. showed that for both pre- and postmenopausal women, exercise can reduce the risk of breast cancer by almost 20% [
51]. High or low levels of physical activity during leisure time were associated with a lower risk of 13 cancers, which in the case of, for example, melanoma and prostate cancer, was associated with an increase in the incidence. The smoking status has modified the association with lung cancer, but not with other cancers associated with smoking [
52]. The results of the research by Khan and others indicate that the fastest-growing preventive measures include doctor’s advice on quitting smoking, testing and vaccination for HPV in relation to, e.g., screening for colorectal cancer, or performing mammography [
53]. The results of the study also suggest that people with low levels of health awareness are more likely to have pessimistic beliefs about the effectiveness of taking preventive measures than people with higher health awareness. The lack of conviction to take action to prevent cancer was associated with lower consumption of fruits and vegetables and fewer days of physical activity. Health literacy was not an important predictor of preventive behavior [
47].
Thanks to the cooperation of the team that was involved in work for the benefit of the local community, but also the wider society, empirical research was carried out in the field of cancer prevention among young Polish people. Its conclusions may have practical implications. An important factor influencing the success of the project was the affiliation of people participating in the activity in the target group. It concerned such aspects as the efficiency of the project implementation and its substantive quality. The results of the team’s work are not only the results of the research but also the effect of disseminating the problem of preventive examinations in the target group through a designed and conducted questionnaire. The obtained results of research on the approach to cancer prevention in young people show that gender and a pro-health attitude may contribute to greater involvement in cancer prevention. In order to examine other implications of these results, the research area should be broadened and deepened, for example, in order to obtain an answer to the question: “What should be done to increase the interest in preventive examinations in young Polish males?”.
6. Conclusions of the Case Study and Practical Implications
Social responsibility can be considered from many perspectives depending on the subject and scope of responsibility (
Figure 1). There is social responsibility at the level of governmental and local authorities as well as international institutions and other institutions, for example, universities. Business also contributes to SD-CSR. Social activity can be divided into activities of individuals, for example, voluntary work; activities of non-governmental organizations [
54,
55,
56]; and as in the case of the presented research, the activity of informal groups. Some of this type of activity has the characteristics of organized activities. The surveyed group met by chance and for a purpose not related to social suitability, that is, unlike, for example, an association that intentionally acts for a selected social problem. What is common for the organization and the informal group is the teamwork and some aspect of moderation that has occurred. On the other hand, the group independently selected the topic and the way of its implementation; the moderator’s support consisted in keeping the organizational framework, establishing the rules, and settling accounts for achieving the goal. In connection with the obtained results, it can be noted that social responsibility can be realized on an occasion and in a natural way and can at the same time be effective. Findings [
57] indicate that leaving the option to choose the form of pro-social activity, which is related to the personal moral and social attitudes of students, increases the attractiveness of pro-social experiences and to a greater extent affects their effectiveness and the development of the students [
57]. Although the scope of the presented action and its impact on society in the selected problem of cancer prevention in young people is limited, this action has the potential of snowballing. The conducted study made it possible to establish several conditions for the effectiveness of such an action: it was necessary to moderate in a group and apply appropriate methods of working in a team; in order to increase the effectiveness, it was necessary to ensure that the action proposal was as feasible as possible, addressed to a group of beneficiaries that could be easily recognized by the team; the conditions that favored the effectiveness of this activity was the choice of a social problem, the target group of which members were also the authors of the solution. This made it possible to recognize the needs of the beneficiaries well and reach a wider audience.
Implementing SR allows students to combine theory with practice, develop critical thinking, improve problem-solving skills, explore community resources, and develop professional and civic skills [
58]. Gaining experience in social service education contributes to the development of leadership and interpersonal skills and the growth of social activism in the future working life [
59,
60].
Summing up, the most important practical implication of the mentioned findings is the observation that the voluntary involvement of an informal group in the dissemination of the problem of cancer prevention in young people, with the use of appropriate teamwork methods, can be an effective tool for the implementation of individual social responsibility, and thus an element building sustainable development. This implication is valuable for those who, for example, are responsible for the education of youths. They need to be encouraged by smart moderators to express their social responsibility. The detailed implications are indicated below:
Socially responsible activity does not need organizational formalization; practically everyone can act for sustainable development, individually or in groups.
The effectiveness of informal groups is strengthened by proper moderation, including the use of team management methods and the freedom to choose the social goal so that it suits the group as much as possible and at the same time enables a good recognition of the social need.
Activities in the informal group for sustainable development benefit the participants: they enable and strengthen their comprehensive development, especially in the field of soft and social skills. This fact also has a motivating potential for participants in such groups. Achieving self-determined goals for social good releases positive energy in people and strengthens their sense of value and agency. Participants of such activities build their future professional and social potential on this experience.