Next Article in Journal
A Schematic Model for Implementing Industries High Risk Projects through the Agent of Human Capital
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation of Metropolitan Area Development Level Based on Quadratic Weighting: A Case Study of Four Metropolitan Areas in the Yangtze River Delta Region
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental Study on Microbial-Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation Repairing Fractured Rock under Different Temperatures

1
School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
2
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(18), 11770; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811770
Submission received: 16 August 2022 / Revised: 15 September 2022 / Accepted: 16 September 2022 / Published: 19 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Materials)

Abstract

:
Microbial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) technology mainly uses carbonates produced by the reaction of microbial activities to repair rocks and soils. Temperature influences microbial metabolism and the kinetics of chemical reactions. In this study, microbial repair experiments on fractured sandstone under different temperatures are carried out. The repair effects are tested with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), an X-ray automatic diffractometer (XRD), uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), and a scanning electron microscope (SEM) test. The influence of the temperature on the restorative effects of MICP was discussed. The results show that the repair effect of the Sporosarcina pasteurii is significantly better as the temperature increases. When the temperature reaches 33 °C, the porosity and permeability of fractured sandstone can be reduced by 55.174% and 98.761%, respectively. The average uniaxial compressive strength can be restored to 6.24 MPa. The repair effect gradually weakens with the increase in temperature. However, the Sporosarcina pasteurii can still maintain relatively good biological activity at temperatures from 33 °C to 39 °C. The main form of CaCO3 produced in the process of MICP is calcite. It can fill in the rock pores, and result in reducing the size and number of large pores and improving the impermeability and strength of fractured yellow sandstone.

1. Introduction

The durability problem of most rocks and building materials is the result of the combined effects of physical, chemical, biological, and other factors. Most problems are caused by external corrosive substances and water entering inside the material through pores and cracks on the surface of the material, resulting in the gradual degradation of the material from the inside to the outside. This often results in the entire structure being damaged before it reaches the expected service life. In addition, some underground engineering, such as underground reservoirs and oil depots, often has a higher requirement for the strength and impervious performance of rock mass. Concrete and chemical grouting materials are often used to improve strength and impervious performance. However, these materials have adverse effects on the environment because their production emits huge amounts of greenhouse gases, such as CO2 [1,2,3]. Therefore, it is very urgent to study a new eco-friendly method to repair and reinforce damaged rock and building materials.
Microbial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) remediation technology is a new remediation method, which mainly uses the products produced by microbial life activities to bind particles and fill material voids, thereby improving the strength and impermeability of materials. It is a biologically induced mineralization. This phenomenon was first discovered by Boquet et al. [3] in 1973, and this biologically induced mineralization exists widely in nature and often occurs in hot springs, oceans, and caves. The mineral crystals produced by biomineralization are diverse and involve diverse biological processes and the environment [4,5,6]. The mineral formed by biomineralization generally has excellent repair characteristics. Even if the microorganisms are dead, their products still play a role for a long time. Biomineralization is a common form of calcium carbonate deposition in nature. Shrestha et al. [7] and Zhou et al. [8] thought that the process of depositing calcium carbonate can be achieved through four different types of reactions in nature: sulfate reduction, photosynthesis, denitrification, and urea hydrolysis.
MICP technology was first applied to porous media materials to reduce their permeability and increase their strength and rigidity [9]. Subsequently, this technology was applied to repair cracks on the surface of stone materials and cement-based materials [10]. Dejong et al. [1] conducted a MICP sand consolidation experiment, and revealed the migration and crystallization modes of microorganisms on sand particles. Later, the scale of the experiment was expanded to provide a feasible application prospect of biogeochemical MICP technology [11]. Minto et al. [12] compared the changes in the hydraulic properties of rock mass after microbial filling of micro-fractures, and found that the hydraulic aperture of the rock mass was significantly reduced after repair. Cuthbert et al. [13] fixed the ureolytic bacterium in the fractured rock, cementing fluid comprising CaCl2 and urea. The results show that MICP grouting induced the conductivity and permeability reduction of fractured rock surrounding the injection within 3 m by 35% and 99%, respectively. Phillips et al. [14] conducted field trials showing that MICP reduced the seepage velocity of fractured rocks by 25% and the permeability of artificially fractured rock samples by 80%. This suggests that MICP can be used to seal subsurface fractures in a near-wellbore environment. Deng et al. [15] and Gao et al. [16] used MICP to repair fractured rocks, and studied the effect of different repair times. After 42 days of repairing, the porosity of fractured sandstone decreases by 36.41%, the impermeability increases by 94.62%, and the compressive strength increases by 30.52%. Due to the simplicity and good filling effect, MICP remediation technology will be used more and more widely for seepage prevention in fractured rock masses [17].
Currently, the research on MICP mainly focuses on the influence of repair time. As underground resource development and engineering construction go deep, the environmental conditions of some deep engineering are obviously different from the surface. The temperature in the deep increases obviously. The research about temperature mainly focuses on the microbial culture stage [18,19]. However, the influence of temperature on the restoration effect of MICP is not clear.
In view of this, the MICP repair experiment was carried out on prefabricated fractured yellow sandstone. Quantitative analysis of the physical and mechanical properties after the experiment reveal the effect of temperature on the MICP repair effect of the fractured rock mass. The experimental results can provide a theoretical basis for its application in practice.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacteria Selection and Rock Sample Preparation

The urea hydrolysis has attracted much attention due to its advantages of a simple system, mild reaction conditions, easy control, and excellent environmental compatibility. Because of its strong enzyme-producing ability, non-pathogenicity, and ability to survive in harsh environments (such as high temperature and high salt), Sporosarcina pasteurii stands out from microorganisms that can secrete urease [20].
Sporosarcina pasteurii used in this study was purchased from the China General Microorganism Culture Collection Center (CGMCC) under the number ATCC® 11859™. It is an alkaliphilic bacteria abundant in soil. CGMCC provides this strain in the form of freeze-dried powder, which requires Casein Soyabean Digest Agar medium for activation.
Commonly used MICP treatment methods include grouting, soaking, spraying, and pre-stirring. Clayey rocks are easily softened and disintegrated in contact with water, which affects the restoration effect and is not suitable for this study. The highly alkaline environment inside materials such as concrete can inhibit the activity of Sporosarcina pasteurii and reduce the repair effect. The rock samples used in the experiment are yellow sandstone, mainly composed of quartz and clay minerals. All rock samples were taken from intact and unweathered sandstone. According to the relevant standards [21], all rock samples were cut as standard cylinders with a diameter of (50 ± 1) mm and a height of (100 ± 1) mm. Afterwards, a water jet was used to produce an artificial crack with a length of 45 mm, a width of 5 mm, and an inclination angle of 45° in the middle of the cylindrical rock sample, as shown in Figure 1.
Generally, the production induced by microorganisms is used to cement the particles in the surrounding environment to form a cement with a certain strength and impermeability to achieve the expected repair effect. Therefore, more than 96% SiO2 and not more than 0.2% mud content (including soluble salts) were used for the filling aggregate. Before the start of the experiment, standard fine sand with a particle size of less than 0.3 mm was screened out.

2.2. Experimental Schemes

To reduce the error caused by the difference of rock samples, the wave velocity of the rock sample was tested with the HS-YS4A rock acoustic wave parameter tester. According to the test results of the rock samples, every three rock samples were taken as a group and numbered. A total of 5 experimental groups and 1 control group were set up. Group A was the control group and will not be repaired. Each experimental group corresponds to a repair temperature, and the repair temperature varies form 27 °C to 39 °C with an interval of 3 °C. The grouping of the rock samples and the results of the acoustic wave test are shown in Table 1.
Before the experiment, all rock samples need to be vacuum saturated (vacuum pressure of 0.1 MPa and pumping time of 6 h). Then the specimens are tested by the AniMR-150 nuclear magnetic resonance imaging analysis system (NMR) to obtain the initial porosity. The initial permeability was obtained using the Coates model of the NMR analysis system [22].
Rock samples and quartz sand were disinfected in the drying oven (temperature 105 °C, 48 h). The bacterial culture, liquid culture medium, and quartz sand were mixed evenly on the clean bench, and then filled into the prefabricated crack of the rocks. Each 50 g sand was mixed with 5 mL of bacterial culture and 5 mL culture medium. Rock samples were cultured in a constant temperature incubator, and then disinfected in a drying oven after repair (temperature 105 °C, 48 h). Every 3 days, 5 mL of urea and CaCl2 with a concentration of 1 mol/L mixed solution and 5 mL of bacterial culture were slowly injected into the fracture to allow adequate penetration. The repair time of the rock sample was 21 days.
All the rock samples were saturated with water for NMR testing. After the NMR test, the rock samples were air-dried under room conditions for 3 days, and then the uniaxial compression strength (UCS) test was performed by the SHT4206 servo universal testing machine. The rock samples in the control group (group A) were directly subjected to UCS test without any repair. According to the stress–strain curve, the UCS and elastic modulus of rock samples were obtained [23]. The porosity, permeability, UCS, and elastic modulus of all rock samples were recorded.
Finally, we used an ADVANCE D8 X-ray automatic diffractometer (XRD) to analyze the composition of cemented sand in prefabricated fractures of repaired rock samples. The material filling the artificial cracks was extracted and observed in a Nova NanoSEM 230 Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM).

3. Results and Analysis

3.1. Repairing Effect of MICP on the Surface

In order to observe the repair effect of MICP on the surface of fractured rock mass, the surface repair results from groups B to F were recorded. As shown in Figure 2, the prefabricated fissures of the rock sample are filled with a mixture of quartz sand. The quartz sand in the fractures is cemented together by the MICP products and sticks to the rock wall. After the repair, a large amount of visible white cement appeared in and around the fabricated crack.
It is obvious that the amount of white cement attached to the fabricated fractures of group D (33 °C) rock samples is the largest. When the ambient temperature is lower or higher than 33 °C, the amount of white cement around the fabricated fractures decreases to varying degrees. It indicates that the repair effect of Sporosarcina pasteurii is the best when the ambient temperature is 33 °C. The amounts of white cement around the prefabricated fractures of the rock samples in groups E (36 °C) and F (39 °C) are larger than that of groups B (27 °C) and C (30 °C). This shows that Sporosarcina pasteurii can maintain relatively good repair activity when the ambient temperature is above 33 °C.

3.2. Repairing Effect of MICP on Permeability and Porosity

The permeability and porosity are two important parameters to evaluate the seepage characteristics of rock materials. In this experiment, these two parameters of the repaired rock sample are evaluated using NMR with the Coates model [22].
Table 2 lists the permeability of the rock samples before and after repair. Before MICP repair treatment, the permeability of rock samples was in the range of 80–120 mD. After MICP repair treatment, the permeability of each group of rock samples decreased dramatically. When the ambient temperature exceeds 30 °C, the permeability of all repaired rock samples drops below 10 mD. The permeability of rock samples generally dropped by one or two ratings, and turned into a type of rock with poor permeability. It shows that the cementation of MICP products in the internal pore structure of the rock sample effectively improves the anti-permeability performance of the rock mass.
Figure 3 shows the average decline rate of permeability with different repair temperatures. When the ambient temperature is in the range of 27–33 °C, the average decline rate of permeability of the repaired rock sample increases with the increase in temperature, and the decline rate reaches the maximum value of 98.761% when the temperature increases to 33 °C. Then, as the temperature increased to 36 °C, the permeability of the repaired rock sample decreased by 94.274%. When the temperature is 39 °C, it dropped by 93.233%. It is still higher than 92.517% when the temperature is 30 °C. This indicated that the optimum temperature for MICP repair of rocks using Sporosarcina pasteurii is around 33 °C. When the temperature is above 33 °C, Sporosarcina pasteurii can reduce the permeability of rock material within a temperature range used in this study.
Table 3 and Figure 4 shows the average porosity and its decline rate with different repair temperatures. It can be seen that the overall average porosity of the repaired rock samples shows a minimum value of 7.404% at 33 °C, which is 55.174% lower than that before repairing.
Similar to the change trend of permeability, the porosity of all rock samples decreased after MICP repair. When the temperature was 36 °C and 39 °C, the porosity of the repaired rock samples decreased by 47.425% and 44.954%, respectively, which still are higher than the drop of 38.978% at 27 °C. This also indicated that Sporosarcina pasteurii could reduce the porosity in the temperature range used in this study.

3.3. Effect of MICP on UCS of Fractured Rock Samples

Table 4 and Figure 5 shows the UCS and elasticity modulus of rock samples repaired at different temperatures. For all temperatures, the UCS and elasticity modulus have been improved after the MICP restoration treatment. The change trend of the average UCS of the repaired rock sample is similar to that of the elasticity modulus. The UCS and elasticity modulus reach the maximum 6.24 MPa and 15.565 GPa at a temperature of 33 °C, respectively. When the temperature is above 33 °C, both UCS and elasticity modulus decrease with increasing temperature. Figure 6 also shows that the UCS and elasticity modulus of the rock samples of groups E (36 °C) and F (39 °C) are higher than that of group C (30 °C). This is in line with the trend of permeability differences observed in Table 2 and Figure 3.
Figure 6 shows the typical stress–strain curves of rock samples repaired at different temperatures. Compared with the unrepaired rock sample, the micro-crack compaction stage of the repaired rock sample has shifted to the left in varying degrees. This indicates that the MICP products cemented the quartz sand in the fracture, and the formed cement effectively filled the fracture, making the rock sample enter the elastic deformation stage earlier. In addition, MICP products fill the micro-cracks, improve the rock’s resistance to stress, and remedy internal defects.
The above results show that when the temperature is 33 °C, MICP has the best effect of repairing prefabricated fractured yellow sandstone. In practical applications, it is generally difficult to reach or maintain 33–39 °C for a long time, so some measures of heat preservation or temperature increase need to be taken. We can apply thermal insulation film before entering the night, but the film needs to be removed regularly to ensure sufficient oxygen supply. In addition, artificial measures such as furnace heating and electric heating wire heating can be used to increase the temperature, and pipelines can be used to ensure that the repaired area is heated evenly.

4. Discussion

According to the results, it can be found that temperature has an important influence on the restoration effect of MICP restoration of fractured rock. However, analyzing the effect of temperature on the remediation effect of MICP from changes in permeability, porosity, and UCS alone is not enough to fully understand the remediation process.

4.1. Influence of Temperature on Biological Activity

The Sporosarcina pasteurii used in this study uses urea as an energy source to produce highly active urease through the process of metabolism to catalyze the hydrolysis of urea [24], which hydrolyzes urea to NH4+ and CO32−. During this process, the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) secreted by bacteria will continuously adsorb Ca2+. Sporosarcina pasteurii increases the alkalinity of the surrounding environment through its own metabolic activities, and Ca2+ and CO32− will combine to form C a C O 3 crystals [25]. The entire reaction process is shown in Formula (1)
C O ( N H 2 ) 2 + 2 H 2 O + C a 2 + Urease C a C O 3 + 2 N H 4 +
Based on the experimental results, the temperature has an important influence on the biological activity of Sporosarcina pasteurii. When the ambient temperature is 33 °C, the biological activity of Sporosarcina pasteurii is the highest. During this temperature, the Sporosarcina pasteurii is easier to reproduce and carry out life activities. When the ambient temperature is higher than 33 °C, Sporosarcina pasteurii can still maintain relatively superior biological activity. The production induced by the Sporosarcina pasteurii is pretty less when the ambient temperature less than 30 °C, and the biological activity of Sporosarcina pasteurii is lower.
Previous studies have shown that the optimum temperature for catalytic activity of pure urease solution is 50 °C, and the temperature of the highest urease activity in soil is 60–70 °C [26,27]. In this study, fractured rock samples were repaired by using the bacterial culture rather than the pure solution of urease. This indicates that urea hydrolysis is only a part of the MICP process. The CaCO3 precipitation generated by bacterial mineralization is not directly generated by the decomposition of substrates by extracellular enzymes, but requires the participation of the living bacteria. When the ambient temperature exceeds the appropriate range, the bacterial activity is inhibited, which in turn leads to a decrease in the MICP repair efficiency.

4.2. Microscopic Analysis of MICP Products

Figure 7 shows the XRD pattern of the mixture in the prefabricated fractures of the repaired rock samples detected obvious SiO2 peaks and CaCO3 peaks. According to the XRD characterization of common rock minerals, it can be determined that the crystal phase of the generated CaCO3 is mainly calcite. The tested production is same as the predicted results in the Equation (1).
The mesoscopic structure of the cement was obtained by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as shown in Figure 8.
It can be seen from Figure 8 that the CaCO3 formed during the repair process has two distribution modes. One mode is the CaCO3 crystals formed on the surface of the sand increases the grain size. The other is the CaCO3 crystals deposited between sand grains, cementing them to each other and with the rock.

4.3. Influence of Temperature on the Composition and Morphology of Cement

As the CaCO3 produced by MICP is deposited in the internal pores of the sandstone, or the quartz sand within fabricated fractures is cemented by CaCO3, the pore structure inside the rock sample will be affected. With different repair temperatures, the distribution of the pore structure is different. Based on the NMR test result, the distribution of the pore structure can be calculated with the T2 spectral distribution curve.
Referring to the work of Deng et al. [28] and Lin et al. [29], pores with a transversal relaxation time of less than 10 ms are defined as micropores, those between 10 and 100 ms are defined as mesopores, and those over 100 ms are defined as macropores.
Figure 9 shows the comparison of the three types of pores between the unrepaired and repaired rock. After repair, the proportion of large pores in the rock sample decreases, while the proportion of small pores increases. The results indicate that as CaCO3 cements and deposits in the pores of the rock sample, the original space of the pores is blocked, and the pore size of the inner pores of the rock sample decreases. Some large pores are transformed into medium pores and small pores, the size and number of large pores are reduced, and the homogeneity of the rock sample increases.
The average proportion of micropores increased from 37.89% to 54.21%, and the average proportion of macropores decreased from 32.01% to 13.38% when the temperature is 33 °C. The rate of micropores proportion increased by 43.08%, and the rate of macropores proportion decreased by 58.2%, both of which were the maximum values of each group of rock samples.

5. Conclusions

MICP is a new type of eco-friendly repair and reinforcement technology to improve the strength and impervious performance for rock and building materials. In this study, the MICP restoration experiments using Sporosarcina pasteurii with different repair temperatures are conducted for fractured yellow sandstone. The influence of the temperature on the repair effect and repair mechanism are analyzed. The main conclusions are as follows.
  • The optimum temperature for Sporosarcina pasteurii to repair the fractured yellow sandstone is about 33 °C. The repair effect between 33 °C and 39 °C is better than between 27 °C and 30 °C.
  • The MICP can effectively improve impermeability and strength. At the optimum temperature, the permeability and porosity of repaired fractured yellow sandstone are reduced by 98.761% and 55.174%, respectively. The average uniaxial compressive strength is restored to 6.24 MPa.
  • The main form of CaCO3 crystals produced in the process of MICP is calcite. At 33 °C, the deposition of CaCO3 minerals is the highest. The CaCO3 crystals fill in the pore of rock, reducing the size and number of large pores and decreasing the permeability and strength of fractured yellow sandstone.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.D.; methodology, J.D.; validation, J.D., Y.Z. and Y.L.; formal analysis, J.D. and Y.Z.; data curation, Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.D.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z. and H.D.; visualization, J.D.; supervision, H.D.; project administration, H.D.; funding acquisition, Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 51874352).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. DeJong, J.T.; Mortensenb, B.M.; Martinez, B.C.; Nelson, D.C. Bio-mediated soil improvement. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Karol, R.H. Chemical Grouting and Soil Stabilization; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  3. Boquet, E.; Boronat, A.; Ramos-Cormenzana, A. Production of calcite (calcium carbonate) crystals by bacteria is a common phenomenon. Nature 1973, 45, 527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Seifan, M.; Samani, A.K.; Berenjian, A. A novel approach to accelerate bacterially induced calcium carbonate precipitation using oxygen releasing compounds (ORCs). Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2017, 12, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lowenstam, H.A.; Margulis, L. Evolutionary prerequisites for early phanerozoic calcareous skeletons. Biosystems 1980, 12, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lowenstam, H.A. Minerals formed by organisms. Science 1981, 211, 1126–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shrestha, P.; Gautam, R.; Ashwath, N. Effects of agronomic treatments on functional diversity of soil microbial community and microbial activity in a revegetated coal mine spoil. Geoderma 2019, 338, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, J.; Chen, D.; Huang, R.; Huang, G.; Yuan, Y.; Fan, H. Effects of bacterial-feeding nematodes on soil microbial activity and the microbial community in oil-contaminated soil. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 234, 424–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Van Passen, L.A.; Daza, C.M.; Staal, M.; Sorokin, D.Y.; van der Zon, W.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Potential soil reinforcement by biological denitrification. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qian, C.X.; Ren, L.F.; Luo, M. Development of Concrete Surface Defects and Cracks Repair Technology Based on Microbial-Induced Mineralization. J. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 43, 619–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dejong, J.T.; Soga, K.; Banwart, S.A.; Whalley, W.R.; Ginn, T.R.; Nelson, D.C.; Mortensen, B.M.; Martinez, B.C.; Barkouki, T. Soil engineering in vivo: Harnessing natural biogeochemical systems for sustainable, multi-functional engineering solutions. J. R. Soc. Interface 2011, 8, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Minto, J.; MacLachlan, E.; El Mountassir, G.; Lunn, R.J. Rock fracture grouting with microbially induced carbonate precipitation. Water Resour. Res. 2016, 52, 8827–8844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cuthbert, M.O.; Mcmillan, L.A.; Handley-Sidhu, S.; Riley, M.S.; Tobler, D.J.; Phoenix, V.R. A field and modeling study of fractured rock permeability reduction using microbially induced calcite precipitation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 13637–13643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Phillips, A.J.; Cunningham, A.B.; Gerlach, R.; Hiebert, R.; Hwang, C.; Lomans, B.P. Fracture Sealing with Microbially-induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation: A Field Study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 4111–4117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Deng, H.W.; Luo, Y.L.; Deng, J.R.; Wu, L.J.; Zhang, Y.N.; Peng, S.Q. Experimental study of improving impermeability and strength of fractured rock by microbial induced carbonate precipitation. Rock Soil Mech. 2019, 40, 3542–3548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gao, R.; Luo, Y.; Deng, H. Experimental study on repair of fractured rock mass by microbial induction technology. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2019, 6, 191318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, D.; Shao, A.L.; Jin, C.Y.; Yan, L. Healing technique for rock cracks based on Microbiologically Induced Calcium Carbonate mineralization. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2018, 30, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liang, C.; Shahin, M.A.; Mujah, D. Influence of Key Environmental Conditions on Microbially Induced Cementation for Soil Stabilization. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2017, 143, 04016083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, X.H.; Miao, L.C.; Tong, T.Z.; Wang, C.C. Study of the effect of temperature on microbially induced carbonate precipitation. Acta Geotech. 2018, 14, 627–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Omoregie, A.I.; Khoshdelnezamiha, G.; Senian, N.; Ong, D.E.L.; Nissom, P.M. Experimental optimisation of various cultural conditions on urease activity for isolated Sporosarcina pasteurii strains and evaluation of their biocement potentials. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 109, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. SL264-2001. Specifications for Rock Tests in Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Engineering. China Water & Power Press: Beijing, China, 2001.
  22. Coates, G.R.; Peveraro, R.C.A.; Hardwick, A.; Roberts, D. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging Log Characterized by Comparison with Petrophysical Properties and Laboratory Core Data. In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, USA, 6–9 October 1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, Y.H.; Yang, S.Q.; Ranjith, P.G.; Zhao, J. Strength failure behavior and crack evolution mechanism of granite containing pre-existing non-coplanar holes: Experimental study and particle flow modeling. Comput. Geotech. 2017, 88, 182–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, J.Y.; Snoeck, D.; Van Vlierberghe, S.; Verstraete, W.; Belie, N.D. Application of hydrogel encapsulated carbonate precipitating bacteria for approaching a realistic self-healing in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 68, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jonkers, H.M.; Thijssen, A.; Muyzer, G.; Copuroglu, O.; Schlangen, E. Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Moyo, C.C.; Kissel, D.E.; Cabrera, M.L. Temperature effects in soil urease activity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1989, 21, 935–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guan, S.Y. Soil Enzymes and Their Research Methods; China Agricultural Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  28. Deng, H.W.; Liu, C.J.; Ke, B.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.N. Experimental study on microscopic damage characteristics of granite under cyclic dynamic disturbances. Chin. J. Eng. 2017, 39, 1634–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lin, Y.; Zhou, K.P.; Gao, R.G.; Li, J.L.; Zhang, J. Influence of Chemical Corrosion on Pore Structure and Mechanical Properties of Sandstone. Geofluids 2019, 2019, 7320536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Prefabricated fractures in rock samples.
Figure 1. Prefabricated fractures in rock samples.
Sustainability 14 11770 g001
Figure 2. Surface of the repaired rock samples.
Figure 2. Surface of the repaired rock samples.
Sustainability 14 11770 g002
Figure 3. Permeability variation of rock samples at different temperatures.
Figure 3. Permeability variation of rock samples at different temperatures.
Sustainability 14 11770 g003
Figure 4. Porosity variation of rock samples at different temperatures.
Figure 4. Porosity variation of rock samples at different temperatures.
Sustainability 14 11770 g004
Figure 5. Average UCS and elasticity modulus of rock samples; (a) Average UCS; (b) Average elasticity modulus.
Figure 5. Average UCS and elasticity modulus of rock samples; (a) Average UCS; (b) Average elasticity modulus.
Sustainability 14 11770 g005
Figure 6. Stress-strain curves of rock samples repaired at different temperatures.
Figure 6. Stress-strain curves of rock samples repaired at different temperatures.
Sustainability 14 11770 g006
Figure 7. XRD test results of the repaired products of group D (33 °C).
Figure 7. XRD test results of the repaired products of group D (33 °C).
Sustainability 14 11770 g007
Figure 8. SEM microscopic images of CaCO3 among sand particles in samples incubated at different temperatures: (a) 27 °C; (b) 30 °C; (c) 33 °C; (d) 36 °C; (e) 39 °C.
Figure 8. SEM microscopic images of CaCO3 among sand particles in samples incubated at different temperatures: (a) 27 °C; (b) 30 °C; (c) 33 °C; (d) 36 °C; (e) 39 °C.
Sustainability 14 11770 g008
Figure 9. Average proportion of pores with different pore sizes before and after MICP treatment.
Figure 9. Average proportion of pores with different pore sizes before and after MICP treatment.
Sustainability 14 11770 g009
Table 1. Acoustic parameter of rock samples.
Table 1. Acoustic parameter of rock samples.
Group and NumberTemperature (°C)Height (mm)Wave Speed (×103 m/s)
A1-99.481.17
A299.561.13
A399.921.16
B127 °C99.101.15
B299.501.14
B399.241.16
C130 °C100.121.17
C299.261.16
C399.241.14
D133 °C99.441.15
D299.181.17
D399.141.14
E136 °C99.201.15
E299.201.14
E399.001.16
F139 °C99.221.15
F298.661.16
F399.941.14
Table 2. Permeability variation of rock samples.
Table 2. Permeability variation of rock samples.
NumberTemperature (°C)Pre-Repair
Permeability (mD)
Post-Repair
Permeability (mD)
Average Decline (%)
A1-111.579
A2102.797
A3115.589
B127 °C109.65514.13588.768
B2117.0089.968
B392.10711.317
C130 °C101.0537.2992.517
C281.0896.757
C390.8966.274
D133 °C116.8332.05198.761
D2113.0740.635
D3114.8341.609
E136 °C111.35.29894.274
E2101.6075.807
E392.5796.206
F139 °C94.8235.13693.233
F2109.5116.352
F395.228.649
Table 3. Porosity variation of rock samples.
Table 3. Porosity variation of rock samples.
NumberTemperature (°C)Pre-Repair
Porosity (%)
Post-Repair
Porosity (%)
Average Decline (%)
A1-16.482
A216.571
A317.129
B127 °C15.53810.63134.582
B216.13110.213
B315.78710.186
C130 °C15.6719.43338.978
C215.3209.956
C316.1189.330
D133 °C16.5707.51655.174
D216.5087.109
D316.4727.586
E136 °C16.5558.91847.425
E216.4018.695
E315.6577.960
F139 °C16.2089.08644.954
F216.8299.013
F316.4609.139
Table 4. UCS and Elasticity modulus of repaired rock samples.
Table 4. UCS and Elasticity modulus of repaired rock samples.
NumberTemperature (°C)UCS (MPa)Elasticity Modulus (GPa)
A1-3.186.907
A23.096.096
A33.416.267
B127 °C4.3546.922
B24.257.403
B34.5227.919
C130 °C4.8699.913
C25.09511.524
C34.78510.477
D133 °C6.22915.943
D26.37915.896
D36.11214.855
E136 °C5.76913.695
E25.78212.807
E36.01613.979
F139 °C5.69711.558
F25.62912.100
F35.55611.817
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Deng, J.; Deng, H.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Y. Experimental Study on Microbial-Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation Repairing Fractured Rock under Different Temperatures. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811770

AMA Style

Deng J, Deng H, Zhang Y, Luo Y. Experimental Study on Microbial-Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation Repairing Fractured Rock under Different Temperatures. Sustainability. 2022; 14(18):11770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811770

Chicago/Turabian Style

Deng, Junren, Hongwei Deng, Yanan Zhang, and Yilin Luo. 2022. "Experimental Study on Microbial-Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation Repairing Fractured Rock under Different Temperatures" Sustainability 14, no. 18: 11770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811770

APA Style

Deng, J., Deng, H., Zhang, Y., & Luo, Y. (2022). Experimental Study on Microbial-Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation Repairing Fractured Rock under Different Temperatures. Sustainability, 14(18), 11770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811770

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop