Effects of Conversation Politeness on Hiring Decision in Online Labor Markets: An Inverted U-Shaped Relationship Exploration
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theory and Hypothesis
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Research Context and Data Collection
3.2. Measures
3.3. Data Analysis and Results
4. Discussion
Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Context | Research Topic | Mechanism | Methodology | Journal | Source |
Online Labor Markets | Decipher how the interaction of geoeconomic factors (such as the country development level) and reputation determines suppliers’ survival. | Reputation systems | Archived data | Information Systems Research | [39] |
Online Labor Markets | Examine the effects of reputation in online labor markets. | Reputation systems | Archived data | Management Science | [6] |
M-Turk | Establish a conceptual model for the value of reputation systems and examine its predictions on Amazon Mechanical Turk. | Reputation systems | Field experiment | Management Science | [35] |
Online labor market | Design a informative rating systems in an online labor market. | Informative rating system | Field experiment | Manufacturing and Service Operations Management | [40] |
Zhubajie | A 3S (screening, signaling and slack) framework is proposed to explain how the trust building mechanism affects the participation and bidding behavior of freelancers. | Trust-Building mechanism | Secondary data | International Journal of Electronic Commerce | [24] |
Freelancer | Analyze the role of online dispute resolution when introduced in the presence of an online reputation system. | Dispute resolution services | Archived data | Production and Operations Management | [8] |
Zhubajie | Investigate the relationship between increased trust and disintermediation | Trust-building mechanism | Field experiment | Management Science | [23] |
Online Labor Markets | Examine the role of content-based messaging systems. | Live chat | Archived data | Information Systems Research | [5] |
Online Work | Presents a new augmented intelligence reputation framework. | Reputation systems | Archived data | Information Systems Research | [14] |
Online labor platforms | Examine the role of algorithmic management in organizing how such work is conducted. | Algorithmic matching, algorithmic control | Case study (Qualitative data) | MIS Quarterly | [38] |
References
- Ask, J.; Murgia, N.; Swerdlow, F.; Jacobs, I.; Kodali, S.; Colin, H.; Stewart, A. The State of Chat in Retail, 2021; Forrester Research: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Benson, A.; Sojourner, A.; Umyarov, A. Can Reputation Discipline the Gig Economy? Experimental Evidence from an Online Labor Market. Manag. Sci. 2019, 66, 1802–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brown, P.; Levinson, S.C.; Levinson, S.C. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, R.; Gilman, A. Politeness Theory and Shakespeare’s Four Major Tragedies. Lang. Soc. 1989, 18, 159–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burtch, G.; Hong, Y.; Kumar, S. When Does Dispute Resolution Substitute for a Reputation System? Empirical Evidence from a Service Procurement Platform. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2021, 30, 1565–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Baird, A.; Straub, D. A linguistic signaling model of social support exchange in online health communities. Decis. Support Syst. 2020, 130, 113233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coussement, K.; Van den Bossche, F.A.; De Bock, K.W. Data Accuracy’s Impact on Segmentation Performance: Benchmarking Rfm Analysis, Logistic Regression, and Decision Trees. J. Bus. Res. 2014, 67, 2751–2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, L.; Huang, L.; Hou, J.; Liu, Y. Continuous content contribution in virtual community: The role of status-standing on motivational mechanisms. Decis. Support Syst. 2020, 132, 113283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, L.; Zhang, J.; Huang, L.; Liu, Y. Social influence on endorsement in social Q&A community: Moderating effects of temporal and spatial factors. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 61, 102396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, W.; Zhang, J. The Comparative Performance of Online Referral Channels in E-Commerce. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2021, 38, 828–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, N.; Johari, R. Designing Informative Rating Systems: Evidence from an Online Labor Market. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2020, 23, 589–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gefen, D.; Wyss, S.; Lichtenstein, Y. Business Familiarity as Risk Mitigation in Software Development Out-sourcing Contracts. MIS Q. 2008, 32, 531–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, G.; Zhu, F. Trust and Disintermediation: Evidence from an Online Freelance Marketplace. Manag. Sci. 2021, 67, 794–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, Y.; Pavlou, P.A. On Buyer Selection of Service Providers in Online Outsourcing Platforms for IT Services. Inf. Syst. Res. 2017, 28, 547–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, Y.; Peng, J.; Burtch, G.; Huang, N. Just DM Me (Politely): Direct Messaging, Politeness, and Hiring Outcomes in Online Labor Markets. Inf. Syst. Res. 2021, 32, 786–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, Y.; Shao, B.B. On Factors that Moderate the Effect of Buyer-Supplier Experience on E-Procurement Platforms. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2021, 30, 1034–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, Z.; Zhu, H.; Dong, K. Buyer-Side Institution-Based Trust-Building Mechanisms: A 3S Framework with Evidence from Online Labor Markets. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2020, 24, 14–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Humphreys, A.; Wang, R.J.-H. Automated Text Analysis for Consumer Research. J. Consum. Res. 2017, 44, 1274–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanat, I.; Hong, Y.; Raghu, T.S. Surviving in Global Online Labor Markets for IT Services: A Geo-Economic Analysis. Inf. Syst. Res. 2018, 29, 893–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kokkodis, M. Dynamic, Multidimensional, and Skillset-Specific Reputation Systems for Online Work. Inf. Syst. Res. 2021, 32, 688–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kokkodis, M.; Ipeirotis, P.G. Reputation Transferability in Online Labor Markets. Manag. Sci. 2016, 62, 1687–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, S.-Y.; Rui, H.; Whinston, A.B. Is Best Answer Really the Best Answer? The Politeness Bias. MIS Q. 2019, 43, 579–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.-J.; Hosanagar, K.; Tan, Y. Do I Follow My Friends or the Crowd? Information Cascades in Online Movie Ratings. Manag. Sci. 2015, 61, 2241–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Leggett, K. Retailers without Chat: A Missed Opportunity. Retrieved 27 March 2018. Available online: https://go.forrester.com/blogs/retailers-without-chat-a-missed-opportunity/ (accessed on 1 May 2022).
- Lin, M.; Liu, Y.; Viswanathan, S. Effectiveness of Reputation in Contracting for Customized Production: Evidence from Online Labor Markets. Manag. Sci. 2018, 64, 345–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, Y. An Empirical Study of Free Product Sampling and Rating Bias. Inf. Syst. Res. 2019, 30, 260–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Si, G.; Gao, B. Which Voice Are You Satisfied With? Understanding the Physician–Patient Voice Interactions on Online Health Platforms. Decis. Support Syst. 2022, 157, 113754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.M.; Chen, J.-H. A multi-label classification based approach for sentiment classification. Expert Syst. Appl. 2015, 42, 1083–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, B.; Fan, W.; Zhou, M. Social Presence, Trust, and Social Commerce Purchase Intention: An Empirical Research. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 56, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lv, Z.; Jin, Y.; Huang, J. How do sellers use live chat to influence consumer purchase decision in China? Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2018, 28, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLean, G.; Osei-Frimpong, K. Examining Satisfaction with the Experience During a Live Chat Service En-counter-Implications for Website Providers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 76, 494–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Möhlmann, M.; Zalmanson, L.; Henfridsson, O.; Gregory, A.R.W. Algorithmic Management of Work on Online Labor Platforms: When Matching Meets Control. MIS Q. 2021, 45, 1999–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stephan, E.; Liberman, N.; Trope, Y. Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 98, 268–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, H.; Chen, J.; Fan, M. Effect of Live Chat on Traffic-to-Sales Conversion: Evidence from an Online Marketplace. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2021, 30, 1201–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, X.; Wang, Y.; Tan, Y. The Value of Live Chat on Online Purchase. In Proceedings of the Thirty Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, Dublin, Ireland, 12 December 2016; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, X.; Wang, Y.; Tan, Y. Impact of Live Chat on Purchase in Electronic Markets: The Moderating Role of Information Cues. Inf. Syst. Res. 2019, 30, 1248–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toma, C.L.; Hancock, J.T. What Lies Beneath: The Linguistic Traces of Deception in Online Dating Profiles. J. Commun. 2012, 62, 78–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y. The price of being polite: Politeness, social status, and their joint impacts on community Q&A efficiency. J. Comput. Soc. Sci. 2021, 4, 101–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, M. From Free to Paid: Customer Expertise and Customer Satisfaction on Knowledge Payment Platforms. Decis. Support Syst. 2019, 127, 113140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Yan, Q.; Zhang, L. A Text Analytics Framework for Understanding the Relationships among Host Self-Description, Trust Perception and Purchase Behavior on Airbnb. Decis. Support Syst. 2020, 133, 113288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | Abbreviation | Description |
---|---|---|
Dependent variable | ||
Hiring decision | HD | Hiring decision as 1 if the employer makes a deal with the vendor, and as 0 if otherwise. |
Focal variables | ||
Politeness density | PD | Politeness density is calculated by dividing the count of the politeness markers by the number of words or phrases. |
Control variable | ||
Authentication | AU | Dummy variable: 1 if the vendor is verified and 0 otherwise. |
Sales amount | SA | The amount of sales the vendor has prior to the focal transaction. |
Review rating | RR | The average numerical rating of reviews the vendor has received from the employers on completed works (5-point Likert scale). |
Tenure | Tenure | The number of years the vendor has been registered on the platform. |
Year | Year | The number of years the employer has been registered on the platform. |
Prior experience | PE | Dummy variable: 1 if the vendor and the employer have had transactions on this platform prior to the focal transaction and 0 otherwise. |
Amount of information | AOI | The total number of replies that a vendor offers the employer. |
Variable | Mean | Std. Dev. | Min | Max |
---|---|---|---|---|
HD | 0.139 | 0.346 | 0 | 1 |
PD | 0.052 | 0.064 | 0 | 1 |
AU | 0.121 | 0.326 | 0 | 1 |
SA | 1,360,478.3 | 3,485,227.3 | 0 | 20,411,970 |
RR | 4.826 | 0.797 | 0 | 5 |
Tenure | 3.154 | 4.764 | 0.071 | 49.033 |
Year | 1.877 | 2.023 | 0.003 | 12.06 |
PE | 0.022 | 0.146 | 0 | 1 |
AOI | 14.412 | 17.817 | 1 | 292 |
Variables | VIF | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) HD | 1.00 | |||||||||
(2) PD | 1.02 | 0.11 | 1.00 | |||||||
(3) AU | 1.11 | 0.05 | −0.07 | 1.00 | ||||||
(4) SA | 1.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 1.00 | |||||
(5) RR | 1.15 | 0.05 | 0.07 | −0.20 | 0.09 | 1.00 | ||||
(6) Tenure | 1.11 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 0.01 | −0.29 | 1.00 | |||
(7) Year | 1.02 | −0.01 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.11 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 1.00 | ||
(8) PE | 1.01 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.02 | −0.01 | 0.06 | 1.00 | |
(9) AOI | 1.03 | 0.29 | −0.03 | −0.07 | −0.06 | 0.10 | −0.04 | −0.04 | 0.08 | 1.00 |
Mean VIF | 1.07 |
Dependent Variable: Hiring Decision | |||
---|---|---|---|
M1 | M2 | M3 | |
PD | 6.952 *** | 8.269 *** | |
(0.589) | (0.848) | ||
PD squared | −9.036 * | ||
(4.577) | |||
AU | 0.299 ** | 0.426 *** | 0.436 *** |
(0.107) | (0.110) | (0.110) | |
AS | 0.0316 *** | 0.0282 *** | 0.0273 *** |
(0.00529) | (0.00536) | (0.00537) | |
RR | 1.159 *** | 1.095 *** | 1.082 *** |
(0.244) | (0.248) | (0.248) | |
Tenure | 0.889 *** | 0.862 *** | 0.854 *** |
(0.0687) | (0.0696) | (0.0698) | |
Year | −0.105 + | −0.131 * | −0.129 * |
(0.0609) | (0.0618) | (0.0618) | |
PE | 2.829 *** | 2.835 *** | 2.839 *** |
(0.182) | (0.188) | (0.189) | |
AOI | 1.090 *** | 1.159 *** | 1.146 *** |
(0.0470) | (0.0489) | (0.0494) | |
_cons | −6.288 *** | −6.454 *** | −6.380 *** |
(0.447) | (0.459) | (0.461) | |
Observations | 7952 | 7952 | 7952 |
Wald chi2 | 840.60 | 896.70 | 887.96 |
Log pseudolikelihood | −2666.6941 | −2606.544 | −2603.9493 |
AIC | 5349.388 | 5231.088 | 5227.899 |
BIC | 5405.238 | 5293.919 | 5297.71 |
Pseudo R2 | 0.1675 | 0.1863 | 0.1871 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Dong, L.; Ji, T.; Zhang, J. Effects of Conversation Politeness on Hiring Decision in Online Labor Markets: An Inverted U-Shaped Relationship Exploration. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15351. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215351
Dong L, Ji T, Zhang J. Effects of Conversation Politeness on Hiring Decision in Online Labor Markets: An Inverted U-Shaped Relationship Exploration. Sustainability. 2022; 14(22):15351. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215351
Chicago/Turabian StyleDong, Lingfeng, Ting Ji, and Jie Zhang. 2022. "Effects of Conversation Politeness on Hiring Decision in Online Labor Markets: An Inverted U-Shaped Relationship Exploration" Sustainability 14, no. 22: 15351. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215351
APA StyleDong, L., Ji, T., & Zhang, J. (2022). Effects of Conversation Politeness on Hiring Decision in Online Labor Markets: An Inverted U-Shaped Relationship Exploration. Sustainability, 14(22), 15351. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215351